Golden State Warriors vs Milwaukee Bucks Match Player Stats
The golden state warriors vs milwaukee bucks match player stats from the NBA regular season meeting on 31 October 2025 provide an excellent picture of how efficiency, shot selection, defensive execution, and bench production shaped the outcome. Milwaukee protected its home court at Fiserv Forum with a 120 to 110 victory over Golden State in front of 17,341 fans. While Stephen Curry delivered another strong scoring performance, the Bucks received balanced contributions across the roster, highlighted by Ryan Rollins’ career-defining offensive display.
For basketball fans, player statistics tell a much deeper story than the final score alone. Shooting percentages, rebounds, assists, turnovers, defensive plays, and bench impact explain why one team controlled key moments while the other struggled to maintain momentum. This complete breakdown examines every important statistic from the matchup, identifies the performances that influenced the result, and explains what the numbers reveal about both teams.
Match Overview
| Match Detail | Information |
| Competition | NBA Regular Season |
| Match | Golden State Warriors vs Milwaukee Bucks |
| Date | 31 October 2025 |
| Venue | Fiserv Forum, Milwaukee, Wisconsin |
| Final Score | Milwaukee Bucks 120, Golden State Warriors 110 |
| Winning Team | Milwaukee Bucks |
| Attendance | 17,341 |
| Officials | James Williams, Ray Acosta, Robert Hussey |
Before tipoff, Milwaukee entered the game with a 4 and 1 record while remaining undefeated at home. Golden State arrived with a 4 and 2 record but had experienced mixed results away from home. Those trends continued as Milwaukee executed better during crucial possessions, particularly in the fourth quarter.
Golden State Warriors vs Milwaukee Bucks Match Player Stats Overview
The golden state warriors vs milwaukee bucks match player stats highlight two contrasting offensive approaches. Golden State relied heavily on its experienced stars, while Milwaukee spread scoring responsibilities throughout both its starting lineup and bench rotation.
Warriors Top Performers
| Player | Points |
| Stephen Curry | 27 |
| Jonathan Kuminga | 24 |
| Jimmy Butler III | 23 |
| Brandin Podziemski | 9 |
| Buddy Hield | 8 |
| Will Richard | 7 |
Stephen Curry once again led the Warriors with 27 points. His perimeter shooting and off ball movement kept Golden State competitive throughout much of the contest. Jonathan Kuminga continued his impressive development by adding 24 points through aggressive drives and efficient finishing around the basket.
Jimmy Butler III contributed 23 points while also handling defensive assignments against Milwaukee’s versatile wings. Together, Curry, Kuminga, and Butler accounted for the majority of Golden State’s offensive production.
The Warriors also received useful contributions from their bench. Brandin Podziemski scored 9 points, Buddy Hield added 8, and rookie Will Richard chipped in with 7 points.
Bucks Top Performers
| Player | Points |
| Ryan Rollins | 32 |
| Myles Turner | 17 |
| Cole Anthony | 16 |
| Gary Trent Jr. | 13 |
| Bobby Portis | 12 |
| Taurean Prince | 10 |
Ryan Rollins produced the standout performance of the evening with an outstanding 32-point effort. He consistently attacked the defense, converted perimeter opportunities, and maintained offensive efficiency throughout all four quarters.
Myles Turner added 17 points while protecting the paint, and Cole Anthony supplied an important 16 points from the bench. Gary Trent Jr., Bobby Portis, and Taurean Prince ensured Milwaukee maintained offensive balance whenever Golden State attempted to reduce the deficit.
Starting Lineups
Golden State Warriors Starters
- Stephen Curry
- Jimmy Butler III
- Jonathan Kuminga
- Draymond Green
- Quinten Post
Milwaukee Bucks Starters
- Ryan Rollins
- AJ Green
- Gary Trent Jr.
- Kyle Kuzma
- Myles Turner
Both starting groups featured a blend of veteran leadership and younger contributors. Golden State relied on Curry’s experience and Butler’s two way impact, while Milwaukee benefited from Rollins’ breakout scoring performance alongside Turner’s interior presence.
Team Statistics Comparison
The overall numbers clearly explain why Milwaukee secured the victory.
| Team Statistics | Warriors | Bucks |
| Field Goals | 36 of 85 | 46 of 96 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 42% | 48% |
| Three Pointers | 13 of 38 | 19 of 46 |
| Three Point Percentage | 34% | 41% |
| Free Throws | 25 of 26 | 9 of 13 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 96% | 69% |
| Total Rebounds | 44 | 34 |
| Assists | 23 | 25 |
| Turnovers | 19 | 12 |
| Steals | 8 | 7 |
| Blocks | 6 | 2 |
| Personal Fouls | 17 | 22 |
Several statistical trends stand out immediately.
Milwaukee shot nearly 50 percent from the field while also making 19 three pointers. That combination created enough offensive efficiency to overcome Golden State’s advantages in rebounding and free throw accuracy.
Golden State converted an outstanding 96 percent of its free throws, missing only one attempt all night. However, the Warriors committed 19 turnovers, giving Milwaukee valuable extra possessions.
Those additional opportunities proved decisive because the Bucks converted efficiently from both inside the paint and beyond the three point line.
Quarter by Quarter Breakdown
First Quarter
Milwaukee 34, Golden State 25
Milwaukee established control immediately with efficient ball movement and confident perimeter shooting. Ryan Rollins attacked aggressively, while the Bucks forced several early Warriors turnovers.
Golden State struggled to find offensive rhythm during the opening minutes despite Curry creating quality looks.
Second Quarter
Golden State 33, Milwaukee 26
The Warriors responded impressively in the second period. Curry increased his scoring pace, Kuminga attacked the basket with confidence, and Butler provided steady offensive production.
Golden State reduced the halftime deficit by improving defensive intensity and limiting Milwaukee’s transition opportunities.
Third Quarter
Milwaukee 27, Golden State 26
The third quarter remained closely contested with both teams exchanging scoring runs. Neither side created significant separation, although Milwaukee maintained a narrow advantage through consistent outside shooting.
Turner’s interior defense also prevented several easy scoring chances for Golden State.
Fourth Quarter
Milwaukee 33, Golden State 26
The final period ultimately determined the outcome.
Milwaukee executed its offense with greater consistency during crunch time, while Golden State’s turnovers disrupted several important possessions. Ryan Rollins continued scoring efficiently, and the Bucks’ supporting cast delivered timely baskets whenever the Warriors attempted a comeback.
Golden State’s stars continued competing until the final minutes, but Milwaukee maintained composure and closed out the contest comfortably.
Stephen Curry’s Offensive Performance
Stephen Curry finished with 27 points, once again proving why he remains one of the NBA’s most dangerous offensive players.
Throughout the game he created scoring opportunities through movement without the basketball, deep perimeter shooting, and quick decision making in pick and roll situations.
Despite Curry’s production, Milwaukee consistently defended Golden State’s supporting shooters effectively, making it difficult for the Warriors to sustain long scoring runs.
His individual performance was impressive, but basketball remains a team game, and the Bucks succeeded by receiving meaningful contributions across multiple positions.
Jonathan Kuminga Continues to Grow
Jonathan Kuminga’s 24 point performance represented another encouraging step in his development.
Rather than settling for difficult jump shots, Kuminga attacked the rim aggressively and finished through contact. His athleticism also helped Golden State compete on the boards and generate transition opportunities.
As the season progresses, performances like this suggest Kuminga is becoming an increasingly reliable secondary scorer alongside Curry and Butler.
Ryan Rollins Delivers the Best Performance of the Night
Among all the golden state warriors vs milwaukee bucks match player stats, Ryan Rollins produced the most memorable individual performance. His game high 32 points came through confident shot selection, efficient finishing, and smart decision making.
Rather than forcing difficult attempts, Rollins consistently attacked when opportunities appeared. He mixed drives to the basket with timely perimeter shooting, making it difficult for Golden State’s defenders to predict his next move.
Several aspects made his performance especially valuable.
- Consistent scoring throughout all four quarters.
- Strong confidence in transition offense.
- Efficient three point shooting that stretched the Warriors’ defense.
- Calm decision making during the closing minutes.
When Golden State reduced the lead in the second quarter, Rollins answered with important baskets that prevented Milwaukee from losing momentum. His ability to score in different situations allowed the Bucks to maintain control whenever the game became competitive.
For Milwaukee, this performance demonstrated the value of having multiple reliable scorers instead of depending on a single offensive option.
Jimmy Butler III Provided Veteran Leadership
Jimmy Butler III finished with 23 points, giving Golden State another dependable offensive contributor.
His impact extended beyond scoring. Butler handled difficult defensive assignments, created opportunities for teammates, and consistently attacked the basket to earn free throw opportunities.
Throughout the second and third quarters, Butler’s aggressive style helped Golden State remain within striking distance. His physical play forced Milwaukee to defend without relaxing, creating more space for Curry and Kuminga.
Although the Warriors ultimately lost, Butler’s balanced performance reflected the leadership expected from an experienced veteran.
Myles Turner Controlled the Interior
While Ryan Rollins attracted attention with his scoring, Myles Turner quietly influenced the game in several important ways.
Turner scored 17 points, but his defensive presence proved equally valuable.
His contributions included:
- Protecting the paint.
- Contesting shots near the rim.
- Providing reliable screening.
- Creating spacing for perimeter shooters.
- Limiting easy second chance opportunities.
Golden State finished with more rebounds, but Turner consistently forced difficult finishes whenever Warriors players attacked the basket.
His ability to contribute on both ends made Milwaukee a more balanced team throughout the contest.
Bench Production Made the Difference
One overlooked area in many NBA games is bench scoring. In this matchup, Milwaukee’s reserves provided more consistent offensive production during critical stretches.
Golden State Bench
| Player | Points |
| Brandin Podziemski | 9 |
| Buddy Hield | 8 |
| Will Richard | 7 |
The Warriors received useful minutes from their reserves, but the overall impact remained limited compared to Milwaukee’s second unit.
Milwaukee Bench
| Player | Points |
| Cole Anthony | 16 |
| Bobby Portis | 12 |
| Taurean Prince | 10 |
Cole Anthony immediately changed the pace whenever he entered the game. His 16 points provided valuable scoring without disrupting Milwaukee’s offensive rhythm.
Bobby Portis added physical rebounding and interior scoring, while Taurean Prince supplied timely shooting.
This balanced bench production allowed Milwaukee’s starters to rest without losing control of the game.
Team Shooting Comparison
Shooting efficiency separated these teams more than any other statistic.
Golden State
- Field Goals: 36 of 85
- Field Goal Percentage: 42 percent
- Three Pointers: 13 of 38
- Three Point Percentage: 34 percent
Milwaukee
- Field Goals: 46 of 96
- Field Goal Percentage: 48 percent
- Three Pointers: 19 of 46
- Three Point Percentage: 41 percent
Although both teams attempted a similar offensive style, Milwaukee converted a significantly higher percentage of shots.
Making six additional three pointers created an 18 point advantage from beyond the arc alone. That difference became extremely difficult for Golden State to overcome.
Free Throw Efficiency
One category clearly favored the Warriors.
Golden State converted 25 of 26 free throws, an outstanding 96 percent success rate.
Milwaukee finished 9 of 13, equal to 69 percent.
Normally, such a large advantage at the free throw line could decide a game.
However, Milwaukee compensated with superior shooting from the field and far fewer turnovers.
This demonstrates an important basketball principle.
Free throws matter, but overall offensive efficiency usually has a greater influence across an entire game.
Turnovers Changed the Outcome
Perhaps the most important statistical difference came in ball security.
Warriors Turnovers
19
Bucks Turnovers
12
Those seven extra turnovers gave Milwaukee additional possessions while preventing Golden State from attempting more shots.
Many of those giveaways occurred during important stretches when the Warriors had opportunities to reduce the deficit.
Protecting the basketball remains one of the simplest ways to improve winning chances, and Milwaukee executed far better in this area.
Rebounding Battle
Golden State actually won the rebounding contest.
| Team | Rebounds |
| Warriors | 44 |
| Bucks | 34 |
Normally, winning the rebounding battle creates additional offensive opportunities.
However, Golden State could not fully capitalize because turnovers and lower shooting efficiency offset that advantage.
Milwaukee demonstrated that quality possessions can sometimes matter more than simply collecting more rebounds.
Ball Movement Comparison
Passing remained fairly balanced throughout the game.
| Team | Assists |
| Warriors | 23 |
| Bucks | 25 |
Milwaukee’s slightly higher assist total reflected excellent teamwork.
Instead of relying on isolation basketball, the Bucks consistently moved the ball until open shooters appeared.
This unselfish approach created cleaner scoring opportunities and contributed to their impressive shooting percentages.
Defensive Performance
Golden State produced:
- 8 steals
- 6 blocks
Milwaukee recorded:
- 7 steals
- 2 blocks
At first glance, Golden State appears stronger defensively.
However, defensive success involves much more than steals and blocks.
Milwaukee consistently forced difficult shots, limited transition baskets, and protected its lead by avoiding unnecessary mistakes.
Their team defense proved more effective over the entire forty eight minutes.
Coaching Decisions
Golden State listed the following players as unavailable through coach’s decision.
- Trayce Jackson Davis
- Pat Spencer
Milwaukee’s inactive players included:
- Thanasis Antetokounmpo
- Pete Nance
- Jericho Sims
- Andre Jackson Jr.
- Mark Sears
Despite multiple unavailable players, Milwaukee maintained excellent rotation balance.
The coaching staff managed player minutes effectively while receiving meaningful production from nearly every contributor.
Tactical Analysis
Several tactical adjustments stood out during the game.
Milwaukee consistently spaced the floor, allowing Rollins and Turner additional room to operate.
Golden State attempted to pressure ball handlers aggressively, but this occasionally opened passing lanes that Milwaukee exploited.
The Bucks also succeeded by attacking quickly before Golden State’s half court defense became organized.
Meanwhile, the Warriors depended heavily on Curry’s shot creation.
Although this strategy produced stretches of success, Milwaukee eventually adjusted by contesting shooters more aggressively during the fourth quarter.
Three Numbers That Explain the Result
Three statistics summarize why Milwaukee earned the victory.
Nineteen
Golden State committed nineteen turnovers, giving away valuable possessions.
Forty One Percent
Milwaukee shot forty one percent from three point range compared with thirty four percent for Golden State.
Thirty Two
Ryan Rollins scored thirty two points, the highest individual total of the game.
Together, these numbers explain why Milwaukee controlled the decisive moments despite Golden State’s excellent free throw shooting and rebounding advantage.
What This Result Means for Both Teams
This game offered valuable insights into where both teams stood early in the 2025 regular season.
For Milwaukee, the victory reinforced the importance of balanced scoring. Instead of depending on one superstar, the Bucks received meaningful production from both starters and reserves. Ryan Rollins led the offense, Myles Turner controlled key moments inside, and the bench maintained the team’s momentum whenever substitutions were made. This type of depth often becomes an important advantage during a long NBA season.
Golden State also found positives despite the defeat. Stephen Curry continued performing at an elite level, Jonathan Kuminga showed further growth as an offensive weapon, and Jimmy Butler III delivered another dependable all around performance. However, reducing turnovers and improving shooting efficiency remain important areas for improvement.
The game demonstrated that basketball success depends on execution across every possession. Winning the rebounding battle and shooting exceptionally well from the free throw line could not overcome inefficient shooting and frequent turnovers.
Season Series Update
Following this contest, Milwaukee took a 1 to 0 lead in the season series.
The next scheduled meeting between these teams took place on 8 January, where Milwaukee again defeated Golden State by a final score of 120 to 113.
Although each game has its own circumstances, Milwaukee showed it could consistently execute against the Warriors through efficient offense, disciplined ball movement, and timely scoring throughout the rotation.
Key Takeaways from the Match
Several important lessons emerge from this matchup.
Balanced Offense Wins Games
Milwaukee placed six players in double figures, making it difficult for Golden State to focus its defensive attention on one scorer.
Turnovers Can Decide Close Games
The Warriors committed 19 turnovers, while the Bucks finished with only 12. Those extra possessions played a significant role in the final result.
Three Point Efficiency Matters
Milwaukee connected on 19 three pointers at 41 percent, while Golden State finished 13 of 38 from beyond the arc.
Modern NBA games are frequently influenced by perimeter shooting, and this matchup was another example.
Bench Production Is Valuable
Cole Anthony, Bobby Portis, and Taurean Prince combined to provide consistent scoring that helped Milwaukee maintain control whenever the starters rested.
Star Performances Need Team Support
Stephen Curry’s 27 points were impressive, but basketball remains a team sport. Milwaukee’s balanced contributions ultimately outweighed Golden State’s individual scoring efforts.
Expert Analysis
Looking beyond the box score, this matchup highlighted the importance of offensive efficiency over raw scoring totals.
Golden State attempted to stay competitive through rebounding, free throw accuracy, and strong individual performances from its leading scorers. Those strengths kept the game within reach for long stretches.
Milwaukee, however, demonstrated greater consistency across nearly every offensive possession. Better shooting percentages, fewer turnovers, and balanced scoring allowed the Bucks to control the pace without relying on one player to carry the offense.
From an analytical perspective, this was a textbook example of how efficiency often outweighs volume. The Bucks attempted more shots because they protected the basketball, and they converted those opportunities at a higher rate.
For coaches and analysts, this game also reinforced another important principle. Sustainable winning usually comes from disciplined team basketball rather than isolated individual brilliance.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Golden State Warriors vs Milwaukee Bucks game on 31 October 2025?
The Milwaukee Bucks defeated the Golden State Warriors by a final score of 120 to 110 at Fiserv Forum.
Who scored the most points in the game?
Ryan Rollins led all players with 32 points, making him the game’s leading scorer.
Who was the Warriors’ leading scorer?
Stephen Curry finished with 27 points, followed by Jonathan Kuminga with 24 and Jimmy Butler III with 23.
Why did Milwaukee win the game?
Milwaukee won because of better field goal efficiency, stronger three point shooting, balanced scoring, and committing only 12 turnovers compared to Golden State’s 19.
Which team shot better from three point range?
Milwaukee shot 41 percent from three point range, while Golden State finished at 34 percent.
What was the biggest statistical difference in the game?
The most significant differences were Milwaukee’s superior shooting efficiency and the Warriors committing seven more turnovers.
Conclusion
The golden state warriors vs milwaukee bucks match player stats reveal far more than the final score. Milwaukee’s 120 to 110 victory resulted from efficient shooting, disciplined ball movement, balanced scoring, and careful possession management throughout the game.
Ryan Rollins delivered the standout individual performance with 32 points, while Myles Turner, Cole Anthony, Bobby Portis, and Gary Trent Jr. provided valuable support that kept Milwaukee’s offense productive from start to finish. On the other side, Stephen Curry, Jonathan Kuminga, and Jimmy Butler III combined for an impressive scoring effort, but Golden State‘s turnovers and lower shooting efficiency prevented a successful comeback.
Looking beyond the scoreboard, this matchup serves as an excellent example of how modern NBA games are often decided by efficiency rather than individual star power alone. Every possession, every pass, and every shot selection contributed to the outcome, making this contest an insightful case study for fans, analysts, and anyone interested in understanding basketball at a deeper level.
