LA Clippers vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats
The LA Clippers vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats from the November 9, 2025 meeting tell a more interesting story than the 114-103 final score alone. Phoenix won at Intuit Dome, but the Clippers actually finished with the better overall field-goal percentage. The difference came from several smaller statistical battles that added up over four quarters, especially three-point shooting, free-throw efficiency, rebounding, assists, and the impact of Phoenix’s key players.
The Suns entered the game at 4-5 and improved to 5-5 with the victory, while the Clippers fell to 3-6. Phoenix built a 10-point halftime advantage, 60-46, after outscoring Los Angeles 35-29 in the first quarter and 25-17 in the second. The Clippers responded strongly in the third quarter, winning it 34-25, but Phoenix closed the game with a 29-23 fourth quarter.
For anyone studying the LA Clippers vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats, the most important lesson is that shooting percentage alone did not decide this game. Phoenix converted 16 of 38 three-point attempts, while Los Angeles made only 10 of 33. The Suns also made 18 of 21 free throws compared with 11 of 18 for the Clippers. Those extra points helped offset Los Angeles shooting 53% from the field compared with Phoenix’s 48%.
LA Clippers vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The game was played on November 9, 2025, at Intuit Dome in Inglewood, California, in front of 18,961 spectators.
Phoenix finished with 114 points, while Los Angeles scored 103. The scoreboard suggests a relatively comfortable Suns victory, but the game had several momentum changes.
Final Score
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Phoenix Suns | 35 | 25 | 25 | 29 | 114 |
| LA Clippers | 29 | 17 | 34 | 23 | 103 |
Phoenix’s 11-point victory was built primarily in the first half.
The Suns scored 60 points through two quarters. The Clippers had only 46. That 14-point halftime deficit created a difficult situation for Los Angeles even though the Clippers later produced their best offensive quarter of the game.
The third quarter demonstrated why the final score does not tell the entire story. Los Angeles scored 34 points in the period, nine more than Phoenix. The Clippers cut into the deficit, but Phoenix still entered the fourth quarter with an eight-point lead.
That final margin proved important. Phoenix did not need to dominate the fourth quarter. It simply needed to prevent Los Angeles from completing the comeback.
Team Shooting Comparison
The shooting numbers provide one of the most useful insights from this matchup.
| Statistic | Phoenix Suns | LA Clippers |
| Field Goals | 40-83 | 41-77 |
| Field Goal % | 48% | 53% |
| Three-Pointers | 16-38 | 10-33 |
| Three-Point % | 42% | 30% |
| Free Throws | 18-21 | 11-18 |
| Free Throw % | 86% | 61% |
At first glance, Los Angeles appears to have been the more efficient shooting team because it made 53% of its field-goal attempts.
That is an important number, but it needs context.
Phoenix attempted six more three-pointers and made six more three-pointers. The Suns also made seven more free throws. Those differences compensated for the Clippers’ superior overall field-goal percentage.
This is a classic example of why box-score analysis should not rely on one shooting statistic.
Phoenix’s Three-Point Advantage
Phoenix converted 16 of 38 three-point attempts, good for 42%.
Los Angeles made 10 of 33, or 30%.
That produced a six-made-three advantage for Phoenix.
Each made three-pointer is worth three points, so those six additional makes represented 18 points from beyond the arc. That was a major part of Phoenix’s offensive advantage.
The Suns did not simply shoot more threes. They shot them efficiently enough to make the extra volume meaningful.
Free Throws Added Another Advantage
Phoenix also made 18 of 21 free throws.
The Clippers made 11 of 18.
That gave Phoenix seven additional made free throws.
The Suns therefore won two important scoring categories:
- Three-point production
- Free-throw production
Los Angeles had the better two-point field-goal efficiency overall, but Phoenix’s perimeter and free-throw advantages proved more valuable on the scoreboard.
Rebounding Was a Major Difference
Phoenix finished with 42 rebounds.
Los Angeles had 27.
That is a 15-rebound advantage for the Suns.
A 15-rebound difference is significant because rebounds can influence both possession and second-chance opportunities. Even without assigning every rebound to a specific scoring sequence, the overall gap shows that Phoenix controlled a major physical aspect of the game.
The Clippers could shoot efficiently and still lose if they failed to secure enough possessions.
Devin Booker Led Phoenix Across the Box Score
Devin Booker was one of the most complete statistical contributors for Phoenix.
He finished with:
- 21 points
- 10 rebounds
- 9 assists
The scoring figure made him Phoenix’s leading scorer, while the 10 rebounds made him the team’s leading rebounder. His nine assists also led the Suns.
The combination is particularly notable because Booker was one assist away from a triple-double.
His contribution was therefore not limited to scoring. He affected the game as a scorer, rebounder, and facilitator.
For readers studying individual player performance, this is one of the most important points in the LA Clippers vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats. A player’s impact cannot always be represented by points alone.
Mark Williams Provided an Important Interior Contribution
Mark Williams scored 19 points and collected six rebounds.
His +18 plus/minus was the best figure for Phoenix.
That number is especially interesting because it suggests that Phoenix performed extremely well during his minutes on the court.
Plus/minus should not be treated as a perfect measure of individual performance. It is influenced by teammates, opponents, lineups, and game situations. However, when combined with Williams’ 19 points and six rebounds, the +18 figure becomes useful supporting evidence.
Williams was not Phoenix’s top scorer, but his statistical profile shows why he was important.
Dillon Brooks Added 16 Points
Dillon Brooks scored 16 points for Phoenix.
His scoring helped provide another reliable option behind Booker and Williams.
Phoenix’s offensive success was not dependent on one player producing an overwhelming scoring total. Instead, the Suns received meaningful contributions from several players.
That balance is reflected in the final score.
Royce O’Neale’s All-Around Bench Production
Royce O’Neale was Phoenix’s leading bench contributor according to the supplied game data.
He recorded:
- 12 points
- 7 rebounds
- 5 assists
This is an excellent example of a box-score contribution that can be overlooked when readers focus only on the leading scorer.
O’Neale contributed in three major statistical categories. His seven rebounds also helped Phoenix maintain its overall advantage on the glass.
His five assists indicate that his value was not restricted to spot-up scoring or secondary offense.
Clippers Player Statistics
Los Angeles had several strong individual performances despite losing the game.
Ivica Zubac was particularly effective inside, while James Harden controlled much of the team’s playmaking.
Ivica Zubac: 21 Points and 15 Rebounds
Ivica Zubac led the Clippers in scoring with 21 points.
He also collected 15 rebounds.
The 15-rebound performance stands out because Los Angeles finished 15 rebounds behind Phoenix as a team. Zubac therefore accounted for a substantial portion of the Clippers’ work on the glass.
His performance also shows why team rebounding can be more complicated than simply identifying the leading rebounder.
A player can dominate individually while the team still loses the overall rebounding battle.
James Harden Led the Clippers in Assists
James Harden finished with 13 assists, the most by any player listed in the supplied data.
That number highlights his role as a primary creator.
While Zubac provided interior production, Harden supplied the passing and playmaking that helped Los Angeles generate offense.
The Clippers finished with 26 assists as a team compared with 30 for Phoenix. That four-assist difference was not enormous, but it favored the Suns.
John Collins Scored 19
John Collins contributed 19 points.
That placed him just two points behind Zubac for the Clippers’ scoring lead.
His scoring was important because Los Angeles needed multiple players to contribute after falling behind in the first half.
Bradley Beal Added 12 Points
Bradley Beal scored 12 points for the Clippers.
His +4 plus/minus was the best listed plus/minus figure for Los Angeles.
Again, plus/minus requires context, but it provides an interesting contrast with Phoenix’s Mark Williams, who recorded +18.
The Rebounding Battle Explains Part of the Result
One of the clearest differences in the LA Clippers vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats is the rebounding gap.
Phoenix had 42 rebounds.
Los Angeles had 27.
That 15-rebound difference is larger than the assist difference and much larger than the turnover difference.
Phoenix also had 30 assists to Los Angeles’ 26.
The Suns turned the ball over 12 times, while the Clippers committed 11 turnovers.
That means turnovers were not the primary reason Phoenix won.
This distinction matters.
If turnovers had been dramatically different, they would deserve a larger share of the explanation. Instead, the major statistical separation came from rebounding, three-point shooting, and free-throw conversion.
Phoenix Won Despite the Clippers’ Better Field-Goal Percentage
This is probably the most interesting statistical feature of the game.
Los Angeles:
- Shot 53% from the field
- Made 41 field goals
- Had 27 rebounds
- Made 10 three-pointers
- Made 11 free throws
Phoenix:
- Shot 48% from the field
- Made 40 field goals
- Had 42 rebounds
- Made 16 three-pointers
- Made 18 free throws
The Clippers made one more field goal than Phoenix.
Yet Phoenix scored 11 more points.
Why?
The answer is shot value.
Phoenix generated significantly more points from three-point range and the free-throw line. The Suns were also substantially better from three and from the line.
This is why analysts should avoid describing a game as simply “the team that shot better won.”
The Clippers had the higher overall field-goal percentage.
The Suns won anyway.
The Three-Point Battle Was Decisive
Phoenix’s 16 made three-pointers compared with 10 for Los Angeles.
That six-three advantage is one of the strongest statistical explanations for the final result.
Phoenix attempted 38 threes, while the Clippers attempted 33.
The Suns therefore had both greater volume and better accuracy.
| Three-Point Category | Phoenix | LA Clippers |
| Attempts | 38 | 33 |
| Makes | 16 | 10 |
| Percentage | 42% | 30% |
This is a particularly useful lesson for readers who want to understand modern NBA game analysis.
A team can shoot a higher percentage overall while still losing the efficiency battle if the opponent generates more high-value shots and converts them.
Free-Throw Efficiency Also Favored Phoenix
The free-throw difference was another important factor.
Phoenix converted 18 of 21 attempts.
That is approximately 86%.
Los Angeles converted 11 of 18.
That is approximately 61%.
Phoenix therefore had both more attempts and a much higher conversion rate.
The seven additional made free throws created another scoring advantage that Los Angeles could not fully offset with its better field-goal percentage.
Quarter-by-Quarter Momentum
Looking at the game quarter by quarter provides a clearer picture of how Phoenix protected its lead.
First Quarter
Phoenix scored 35 points.
Los Angeles scored 29.
The Suns gained a six-point advantage immediately.
A strong opening quarter can have an outsized impact because it forces the trailing team to spend the rest of the game chasing the score.
Second Quarter
Phoenix again won the quarter, 25-17.
This was the most important scoring period from a game-flow perspective.
The Suns extended their lead by another eight points and went into halftime ahead 60-46.
That 14-point halftime advantage became the foundation of the victory.
Third Quarter
The Clippers finally responded.
Los Angeles scored 34 points while Phoenix scored 25.
The Clippers won the quarter by nine.
That reduced the deficit to eight entering the final period.
This was the point at which a comeback became realistic.
Fourth Quarter
Phoenix responded by scoring 29 points.
Los Angeles scored 23.
The Suns won the final quarter by six and closed out the 114-103 victory.
The fourth-quarter response was important because Phoenix did not allow the Clippers’ third-quarter surge to turn into a complete comeback.
What the Team Statistics Reveal
The overall box score can be summarized through several major categories.
| Category | Advantage |
| Final Score | Phoenix |
| Field Goal Percentage | Clippers |
| Made Field Goals | Clippers |
| Three-Point Makes | Phoenix |
| Three-Point Percentage | Phoenix |
| Free Throws Made | Phoenix |
| Free Throw Percentage | Phoenix |
| Rebounds | Phoenix |
| Assists | Phoenix |
| Turnovers | Clippers |
| Steals | Phoenix |
| Blocks | Clippers |
Phoenix recorded nine steals compared with five for Los Angeles.
The Clippers had five blocks compared with two for Phoenix.
So even the defensive statistics were mixed.
Los Angeles had the advantage in blocks and turnovers, while Phoenix had the advantage in steals and rebounds.
This reinforces the idea that the Suns did not win because of one universal statistical advantage. They won because several important categories collectively tilted in their favor.
Why the Clippers Lost Despite Shooting 53%
The obvious question is why a team shooting 53% from the field would lose by 11 points.
The answer is that field-goal percentage treats every made field goal similarly, while the scoreboard does not.
A made two-pointer contributes two points.
A made three-pointer contributes three.
Phoenix’s 16 made threes compared with Los Angeles’ 10 gave the Suns a substantial perimeter scoring advantage.
Free throws added another layer.
The Clippers also had a significant rebounding disadvantage.
Therefore, Los Angeles’ excellent shooting from the field was not enough to overcome Phoenix’s superior three-point production, free-throw scoring, and rebounding.
Why Devin Booker’s 21-10-9 Matters
Booker’s 21 points were not an explosive scoring performance by traditional NBA standards, but his overall line was highly valuable.
Twenty-one points, 10 rebounds, and nine assists show a player contributing across multiple dimensions.
The nine assists are especially important because Phoenix finished with 30 assists as a team.
Booker’s role therefore extended beyond scoring.
His rebounding contribution also helped address the team’s need to control possessions.
The most useful interpretation is not simply that Booker scored 21 points. It is that he nearly produced a triple-double while leading Phoenix in three major box-score categories.
Zubac’s 21-15 Performance Deserves Attention
The Clippers’ best individual statistical performance came from Ivica Zubac in terms of combining scoring and rebounding.
He recorded 21 points and 15 rebounds.
That double-double demonstrates strong interior production.
However, his individual rebounding total could not prevent Los Angeles from finishing 15 rebounds behind Phoenix as a team.
This is a valuable reminder that individual dominance does not automatically translate into team dominance.
Phoenix’s Bench Had Useful Production
Royce O’Neale’s 12 points, seven rebounds, and five assists provided a balanced contribution outside the primary scoring options.
Bench production often becomes important in games where the leading players are closely matched.
Phoenix received meaningful production from multiple players rather than relying exclusively on Booker.
That balance helped the Suns maintain their advantage.
What the Plus/Minus Numbers Tell Us
Mark Williams recorded Phoenix’s best listed plus/minus at +18.
Bradley Beal had the best listed figure for Los Angeles at +4.
The difference is substantial, but plus/minus should be interpreted carefully.
It measures the team’s scoring margin while a player is on the court. It does not isolate the player’s individual actions.
For that reason, plus/minus works best when combined with traditional box-score statistics.
Williams’ +18 becomes more informative when considered alongside his 19 points and six rebounds.
Beal’s +4 should similarly be considered alongside his 12 points.
Season Series Context
The supplied information lists four meetings between the teams:
- October 25: Clippers 129, Suns 102
- November 7: Suns 115, Clippers 102
- November 9: Suns 114, Clippers 103
- February 2: Clippers 117, Suns 93
After the November 9 game, Phoenix led the season series 2-1.
However, the supplied list also includes the February 2 result, which means the four listed meetings finished 2-2 overall.
This distinction is important when discussing season-series records.
The November 9 game itself should be described as Phoenix’s second consecutive victory over Los Angeles in the listed November meetings, while the complete four-game list shows the teams splitting the series 2-2.
A Better Way to Read NBA Player Stats
Readers often search for player stats because they want more than a final score.
A useful approach is to examine the game in layers.
Start With the Score
The final score establishes the basic outcome.
Phoenix won 114-103.
Move to Shooting
Next, compare:
- Field-goal percentage
- Three-point percentage
- Three-point attempts
- Free-throw percentage
This reveals how the points were generated.
Examine Possession-Related Categories
Rebounds, turnovers, assists, steals, and blocks provide additional context.
In this game, the 15-rebound difference stands out immediately.
Then Study Individual Players
Only after understanding the team statistics should you evaluate individual performances.
That approach makes Booker, Zubac, Harden, Williams, Collins, Beal, Brooks, and O’Neale’s numbers easier to understand.
Most Important Player Performances
Based on the supplied data, the standout statistical performances were:
Phoenix Suns
Devin Booker: 21 points, 10 rebounds, 9 assists
Mark Williams: 19 points, 6 rebounds, +18
Dillon Brooks: 16 points
Royce O’Neale: 12 points, 7 rebounds, 5 assists
LA Clippers
Ivica Zubac: 21 points, 15 rebounds
James Harden: 13 assists
John Collins: 19 points
Bradley Beal: 12 points, +4
These performances demonstrate that the game featured several players contributing in different ways.
The Most Important Numbers From the Game
If a reader has only one minute to understand the matchup, these numbers provide the clearest picture:
114-103: Phoenix’s final score
42-27: Phoenix’s rebounding advantage
16-10: Phoenix’s advantage in made three-pointers
18-11: Phoenix’s advantage in made free throws
53%-48%: Los Angeles’ advantage in overall field-goal percentage
30-26: Phoenix’s advantage in assists
12-11: Phoenix’s turnovers compared with Los Angeles
21-10-9: Booker’s points, rebounds, and assists
21-15: Zubac’s points and rebounds
These figures explain why the final score looked different from what the basic shooting percentage suggested.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points for the Phoenix Suns?
Devin Booker led Phoenix with 21 points. He also had 10 rebounds and nine assists.
Who led the Clippers in scoring?
Ivica Zubac led the Clippers with 21 points. He also grabbed 15 rebounds.
Who had the most assists in the game?
James Harden led the Clippers with 13 assists. Devin Booker led Phoenix with nine assists.
Which team shot better from the field?
The Clippers shot better overall, making 41 of 77 attempts for 53%. Phoenix made 40 of 83 for 48%.
Why did Phoenix win despite shooting a lower field-goal percentage?
Phoenix made 16 three-pointers compared with 10 for Los Angeles, converted 18 free throws compared with 11, and outrebounded the Clippers 42-27.
What was the final score?
The Phoenix Suns defeated the LA Clippers 114-103 on November 9, 2025, at Intuit Dome.
Conclusion
The November 9 matchup provides a strong example of why NBA game analysis requires more than looking at the final score or field-goal percentage.
The Clippers shot 53% from the field, compared with 48% for Phoenix, and made one more field goal overall. Yet the Suns won by 11 points because they created a much stronger statistical profile in several high-impact areas.
Phoenix made 16 three-pointers to Los Angeles’ 10. The Suns also made 18 free throws compared with 11 for the Clippers. Most importantly, Phoenix controlled the rebounding battle 42-27.
Devin Booker was Phoenix’s most complete statistical contributor with 21 points, 10 rebounds, and nine assists. Mark Williams added 19 points and six rebounds while posting the team’s best listed plus/minus at +18. Royce O’Neale also provided valuable all-around bench production.
For Los Angeles, Ivica Zubac produced 21 points and 15 rebounds, while James Harden finished with 13 assists. John Collins added 19 points, giving the Clippers several productive individual performances despite the defeat.
The biggest takeaway from the LA Clippers vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats is that efficient shooting from the field does not automatically determine the winner. Shot value, rebounding, free throws, and overall possession quality can have a greater effect on the final result.
In this matchup, Phoenix’s superior three-point shooting, free-throw production, rebounding, and first-half execution ultimately outweighed Los Angeles’ excellent overall field-goal percentage.
