Lakers vs Pacers Match Player Stats

The lakers vs pacers match player stats from March 7, 2026, tell a clear story about how the Los Angeles Lakers controlled the game against the Indiana Pacers. Los Angeles earned a 128-117 victory at crypto.com Arena, improving to 38-25 while Indiana fell to 15-48. Luka Doncic was the dominant individual performer, finishing with 44 points, 9 rebounds, and 5 assists while shooting 14 of 25 from the field and 7 of 14 from three-point range. His performance was supported by Austin Reaves, Rui Hachimura, Marcus Smart, Jaxson Hayes, and an unusually productive Lakers bench.

The final score alone does not fully explain why the Lakers won. Indiana actually scored 37 points in the fourth quarter, its best offensive quarter of the night, but Los Angeles had already established enough separation through efficient shooting and superior three-point production. The Lakers finished the game shooting 53% from the field and 46% from three, compared with 47% and 23% for the Pacers.

This makes the March 7 matchup particularly useful for anyone looking beyond the box score. The individual numbers show not only who scored, but also which players influenced efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, defensive activity, and overall game control.

Lakers vs Pacers Match Player Stats

The most important individual numbers from the game are summarized below.

Player	Team	MIN	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	FT	+/-
Luka Doncic	Lakers	32	44	9	5	14-25	7-14	9-10	+20
Austin Reaves	Lakers	29	19	2	5	6-14	1-4	6-7	-12
Rui Hachimura	Lakers	23	13	3	1	5-8	2-3	1-1	+6
Marcus Smart	Lakers	29	11	3	3	4-6	3-4	0-0	+8
Jaxson Hayes	Lakers	25	9	4	2	3-6	0-0	3-3	+2
Pascal Siakam	Pacers	29	26	5	3	10-20	0-3	6-9	-8
Andrew Nembhard	Pacers	31	17	2	8	7-14	1-6	2-2	-14
Jay Huff	Pacers	33	16	6	2	6-13	2-6	2-2	+2
Jarace Walker	Pacers	27	10	9	5	4-9	1-3	1-2	+9
Aaron Nesmith	Pacers	23	7	3	1	3-10	1-6	0-0	-4

The numbers immediately highlight one major difference between the teams. Indiana had several productive players, but Los Angeles received an exceptional scoring performance from Doncic and greater overall shooting efficiency from its lineup.

Luka Doncic Dominates the Game

The biggest individual story in the lakers vs pacers match player stats was Luka Doncic’s 44-point performance.

Doncic played 32 minutes and converted 14 of his 25 field-goal attempts. He also knocked down 7 of 14 three-point attempts and made 9 of 10 free throws. That combination gave him scoring efficiency from multiple areas rather than relying on one type of shot.

His complete statistical line was:

• 44 points
• 9 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 3 steals
• 2 blocks
• 14-of-25 field goals
• 7-of-14 three-pointers
• 9-of-10 free throws
• 3 turnovers
• +20 plus/minus

The 44 points represented more than one-third of the Lakers’ total scoring. Los Angeles scored 128 points, meaning Doncic accounted for approximately 34.4% of the team’s offensive output.

His three-point shooting was especially important. The Lakers made 17 threes as a team, while Doncic alone accounted for seven of them.

That allowed Los Angeles to stretch the Pacers’ defense. When a player is shooting 50% from three on 14 attempts, defenders cannot simply concede perimeter space and concentrate on stopping drives.

Doncic’s nine rebounds also mattered because his contribution was not limited to scoring. He helped Los Angeles finish with a 43-40 rebounding advantage.

Why Doncic’s Efficiency Stood Out

A 44-point game can sometimes be misleading if it requires a very high number of attempts. That was not the case here.

Doncic attempted 25 field goals and 10 free throws. He made 14 field goals and nine free throws, while also hitting seven three-pointers.

His effective field-goal percentage was approximately 70%.

That is an outstanding figure for a high-volume scoring performance.

His shooting line also demonstrates versatility. He was successful inside the three-point line, efficient from outside, and highly effective at the free-throw line.

The +20 plus/minus provides another indication of his impact. Although plus/minus should never be interpreted in isolation, a +20 in a 128-117 victory supports the broader picture created by his scoring and playmaking numbers.

Pascal Siakam Leads Indiana

Pascal Siakam was the Pacers’ leading scorer with 26 points.

He played 29 minutes and shot 10 of 20 from the field. He also made 6 of 9 free throws while finishing with five rebounds, three assists, and two steals.

His final line included:

• 26 points
• 5 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 2 steals
• 10-of-20 field goals
• 0-of-3 three-pointers
• 6-of-9 free throws
• 2 turnovers
• -8 plus/minus

Siakam was efficient from the field, shooting 50%, but his lack of three-point production created a contrast with Doncic’s perimeter impact.

Indiana needed multiple sources of efficient scoring because Los Angeles was producing points at a very high rate from outside.

Siakam did his part as the Pacers’ primary scorer, but Indiana’s overall shooting profile made it difficult to keep pace.

Andrew Nembhard Provides Playmaking

Andrew Nembhard had one of the more interesting statistical performances for Indiana.

He finished with 17 points and eight assists while committing only one turnover.

His shooting line was 7 of 14 from the field, 1 of 6 from three, and 2 of 2 from the free-throw line.

The eight assists were particularly valuable because Nembhard was responsible for creating opportunities for teammates while still contributing as a scorer.

His statistical profile included:

• 17 points
• 8 assists
• 2 rebounds
• 1 steal
• 7-of-14 shooting
• 1-of-6 from three
• 2-of-2 free throws
• 1 turnover
• -14 plus/minus

The eight assists were a team high for Indiana among the listed key performers.

However, his -14 plus/minus shows the difference between individual production and overall lineup results. Nembhard could generate offense without necessarily winning his minutes against the Lakers.

That is an important lesson when analyzing basketball statistics. A player can post strong traditional numbers while his team still loses the broader possession battle.

Jay Huff Gives Indiana Interior and Perimeter Value

Jay Huff played 33 minutes, the most among the highlighted Pacers players.

He scored 16 points while shooting 6 of 13 from the field. He also made two three-pointers on six attempts, grabbed six rebounds, recorded two assists, one steal, and two blocks.

His +2 plus/minus was one of the better figures among Indiana’s major contributors.

Huff’s ability to provide spacing from the perimeter while also contributing as a rebounder and shot blocker gave Indiana some useful balance.

His six rebounds were important because the Pacers were only three rebounds behind the Lakers overall.

Still, his 2-of-6 shooting from three shows another problem for Indiana. The Pacers did not get enough perimeter efficiency from their frontcourt options to punish the Lakers consistently.

Jarace Walker’s All-Around Contribution

Jarace Walker did not lead Indiana in scoring, but his statistical profile was one of the more balanced performances in the game.

He recorded:

• 10 points
• 9 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 1 steal
• 4-of-9 field goals
• 1-of-3 three-pointers
• 1-of-2 free throws
• +9 plus/minus

The nine rebounds were especially valuable.

Walker was one rebound away from a double-double and also produced five assists. His +9 was the best plus/minus among the highlighted Indiana starters or key rotation players.

This is a good example of why player analysis should not focus exclusively on scoring. Walker’s contribution came through several statistical categories.

Austin Reaves Adds 19 Points

Austin Reaves scored 19 points in 29 minutes.

He shot 6 of 14 from the field and 1 of 4 from three, while making 6 of 7 free throws.

He also recorded five assists.

His full line was:

• 19 points
• 2 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 6-of-14 field goals
• 1-of-4 three-pointers
• 6-of-7 free throws
• 3 turnovers
• 6 personal fouls
• -12 plus/minus

Reaves was an important secondary scoring option behind Doncic.

His free-throw shooting also helped the Lakers maintain their overall 91% team success from the foul line.

However, his -12 plus/minus demonstrates why the team’s overall victory should not automatically be attributed equally to every player who scored efficiently.

Rui Hachimura Provides Efficient Scoring

Rui Hachimura scored 13 points in 23 minutes.

His 5-of-8 shooting from the field was highly efficient, and he made 2 of 3 attempts from three-point range.

He also made his only free-throw attempt.

His statistical line was:

• 13 points
• 3 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 5-of-8 field goals
• 2-of-3 three-pointers
• 1-of-1 free throws
• +6 plus/minus

Hachimura’s efficiency was valuable because he did not need a large number of possessions to contribute.

His two made three-pointers also strengthened the Lakers’ perimeter attack.

Marcus Smart’s Shooting Efficiency

Marcus Smart scored 11 points and shot 4 of 6 from the field.

More importantly, he made 3 of 4 three-point attempts.

That gave him a 75% success rate from three for the game.

His overall line included three rebounds, three assists, two turnovers, and a +8 plus/minus.

Smart’s shooting was particularly useful because the Lakers had multiple players capable of punishing Indiana from outside.

When Doncic, Smart, and Hachimura are all converting perimeter attempts efficiently, defensive coverage becomes much more difficult.

Jaxson Hayes Contributes Inside

Jaxson Hayes scored nine points in 25 minutes.

He shot 3 of 6 from the field and made all three of his free throws.

He also recorded four rebounds, two assists, and one steal.

While his scoring total was modest, Hayes provided useful interior production and rebounding support.

His +2 plus/minus was also positive.

Lakers Bench Makes a Major Difference

One of the most important details in the box score is the production from the Lakers’ second unit.

Luke Kennard scored 15 points on 6-of-9 shooting and made 3 of 5 attempts from three. He also grabbed seven rebounds and finished with a remarkable +26 plus/minus.

That was the highest plus/minus among the highlighted Lakers players.

Kennard’s performance is particularly important because he gave Los Angeles efficient scoring without requiring the same volume of possessions as Doncic.

Jarred Vanderbilt contributed differently. He scored only two points, but he grabbed eight rebounds and recorded three assists while finishing +12.

This is precisely why bench analysis should not be limited to points.

A player can have a low scoring total and still influence the game through rebounding, passing, defense, and possession control.

Jake LaRavia added eight points and two rebounds.

Together, the Lakers’ bench helped prevent the offense from becoming completely dependent on Doncic.

Pacers Bench Contributions

Indiana also received useful production from its bench.

T.J. McConnell recorded 10 points, four assists, and two steals.

Micah Potter produced eight points, six rebounds, and three assists.

Ben Sheppard contributed five points, four assists, and three steals.

These numbers show that the Pacers were not completely lacking secondary production.

The bigger issue was efficiency and consistency across the entire team.

Indiana finished with 98 field-goal attempts compared with 85 for Los Angeles. Yet the Lakers still scored 128 points while Indiana scored 117.

That tells us something important.

The Pacers had more attempts, but the Lakers made much more of the opportunities they received.

Lakers Win the Three-Point Battle

The biggest statistical difference between the teams was three-point shooting.

Los Angeles:

• 17-of-37 from three
• 46% three-point shooting

Indiana:

• 8-of-35 from three
• 23% three-point shooting

The Lakers therefore made nine more three-pointers.

Those nine additional made threes represent 27 additional points.

That is an enormous advantage in a game decided by 11 points.

Indiana’s 35 attempts show that the Pacers were willing to shoot from outside. The problem was conversion.

A 23% team shooting percentage from three makes it difficult to match an opponent shooting 46%.

This was arguably the single most important statistical reason for the Lakers’ victory.

Free Throws Also Favor Los Angeles

The Lakers were excellent at the free-throw line.

They made 21 of 23 attempts, or 91%.

Indiana made 17 of 24, or 71%.

The Lakers therefore made four more free throws despite attempting one fewer.

The difference was not as large as the three-point gap, but it still contributed to the final margin.

Free throws also matter because they represent scoring opportunities without requiring a field-goal attempt.

Los Angeles converted those opportunities at an extremely high rate.

Rebounding Battle Was Close

The rebounding numbers were:

• Lakers: 43
• Pacers: 40

Los Angeles won the rebounding battle by only three.

That means rebounding was not the primary reason for the result.

Indiana remained competitive on the glass, with Jarace Walker collecting nine rebounds and Jay Huff adding six.

The Lakers received major help from Vanderbilt’s eight rebounds and Doncic’s nine.

The close rebounding margin makes the shooting difference even more significant. Los Angeles did not win because it dominated the glass. It won because it converted its possessions more efficiently.

Assists and Ball Movement

Indiana finished with 33 assists, compared with 25 for Los Angeles.

At first glance, that may seem surprising because the Lakers won comfortably.

But assists do not automatically translate into victory.

Indiana’s 33 assists indicate that the Pacers generated a substantial amount of assisted offense.

Nembhard alone had eight assists, while Walker had five and McConnell had four.

Los Angeles had fewer assists, but its individual shot creation was highly effective.

Doncic’s 44-point performance is a major reason for that difference. A high-level isolation or self-created scoring possession may not produce an assist even when it produces an efficient basket.

This is an important distinction when reading a box score.

More assists can indicate better ball movement, but they do not necessarily indicate better offensive efficiency.

Turnovers Give Indiana a Positive

Indiana committed only seven turnovers.

Los Angeles committed 12.

That is a five-turnover advantage for the Pacers.

Normally, that would be a significant positive.

The Pacers also recorded 10 steals compared with five for the Lakers.

Yet Indiana still lost by 11.

This reinforces how powerful the Lakers’ shooting advantage was.

Los Angeles was able to overcome more turnovers because it generated much greater scoring efficiency.

The Quarter-by-Quarter Story

The game developed in a clear pattern.

First Quarter

Lakers 35, Pacers 27

Los Angeles immediately established an eight-point advantage.

That fast start helped create the foundation for the eventual victory.

Second Quarter

Lakers 29, Pacers 24

The Lakers extended their advantage by another five points.

At halftime, Los Angeles had created a 13-point lead.

Third Quarter

Lakers 35, Pacers 29

The Lakers continued to control the game.

The five-point third-quarter advantage increased the margin to 19 points entering the fourth.

Fourth Quarter

Pacers 37, Lakers 29

Indiana finally produced its strongest offensive quarter.

The Pacers scored 37 points while limiting Los Angeles to 29.

However, the fourth-quarter comeback was not enough because the Lakers had built such a large cushion earlier.

This is an important part of the game story.

The final 11-point margin does not fully describe how much control Los Angeles had for much of the night.

Why Indiana’s Fourth-Quarter Surge Was Not Enough

The Pacers’ 37-point fourth quarter demonstrates that their offense remained capable of producing at a high level.

But a comeback requires more than simply scoring.

Indiana needed to combine its scoring with stops.

Instead, the Lakers still scored 29 points in the final quarter.

That prevented Indiana from cutting the deficit quickly enough.

The Lakers entered the fourth quarter with a 19-point advantage. Even though Indiana won the quarter by eight, that left the Pacers nine points short of forcing a much closer finish.

What the Team Shooting Numbers Reveal

The team shooting comparison is one of the clearest ways to understand the game.

Category	Lakers	Pacers
Field Goals	45-85	46-98
Field-Goal %	53%	47%
Three-Pointers	17-37	8-35
Three-Point %	46%	23%
Free Throws	21-23	17-24
Free-Throw %	91%	71%
Rebounds	43	40
Assists	25	33
Turnovers	12	7
Steals	5	10
Blocks	2	4

The Pacers actually made one more field goal than the Lakers.

That is a fascinating detail.

Indiana made 46 field goals compared with 45 for Los Angeles.

Yet the Lakers won by 11.

The explanation is the three-point line.

Los Angeles made nine more three-pointers, creating a 27-point advantage from those made shots alone.

That outweighed Indiana’s advantage in field-goal attempts and made field goals.

Shooting Efficiency Was the Deciding Factor

Los Angeles attempted 85 field goals and made 45.

Indiana attempted 98 and made 46.

The Pacers needed 13 additional attempts to make only one additional field goal.

That illustrates the difference in efficiency.

Los Angeles converted 53% of its field-goal attempts.

Indiana converted 47%.

The difference might appear modest when written as a percentage, but it becomes significant across an entire game.

The three-point disparity then magnified that advantage.

The Meaning of the Plus/Minus Numbers

Plus/minus statistics should be used carefully, but several numbers stand out.

For Los Angeles:

• Luka Doncic: +20
• Luke Kennard: +26
• Jarred Vanderbilt: +12
• Marcus Smart: +8
• Rui Hachimura: +6

For Indiana:

• Jarace Walker: +9
• Jay Huff: +2
• T.J. McConnell: positive contribution reflected through his broader bench output
• Pascal Siakam: -8
• Andrew Nembhard: -14

Kennard’s +26 is particularly notable.

He did not score anywhere close to Doncic’s 44 points, but his minutes were extremely successful from a team perspective.

This demonstrates why evaluating player performance requires more than looking at the scoring column.

Comparing the Leading Scorers

The two leading scorers had very different statistical profiles.

Luka Doncic

44 points
14-of-25 FG
7-of-14 3PT
9-of-10 FT
9 rebounds
5 assists
3 steals
2 blocks
+20

Pascal Siakam

26 points
10-of-20 FG
0-of-3 3PT
6-of-9 FT
5 rebounds
3 assists
2 steals
-8

Siakam’s 26 points were respectable and efficient.

But Doncic’s combination of scoring volume, three-point shooting, rebounding, and playmaking created a substantially larger offensive impact.

Doncic also produced 18 more points than Siakam.

The Importance of Luka’s Three-Point Shooting

Doncic made seven three-pointers.

The Pacers made eight as an entire team.

That means Doncic almost matched Indiana’s entire team output from beyond the arc.

This is one of the most striking details in the game.

His 7-of-14 shooting from three gave the Lakers a reliable high-value scoring source throughout the contest.

For a defense, that creates a difficult choice.

Defenders must respect his perimeter shot, but giving him additional space can also open opportunities for drives and passing.

How the Lakers Supported Their Star

A common problem in games featuring a dominant scorer is overreliance on one player.

That was not the case here.

Los Angeles received:

• 44 points from Doncic
• 19 from Reaves
• 15 from Kennard
• 13 from Hachimura
• 11 from Smart
• 9 from Hayes
• 8 from LaRavia

That distribution gave the Lakers multiple scoring outlets.

Even though Doncic was clearly the offensive centerpiece, the supporting cast made the Pacers pay when defensive attention shifted toward him.

Indiana’s Offensive Distribution

Indiana also had several contributors:

• 26 points from Siakam
• 17 from Nembhard
• 16 from Huff
• 10 from Walker
• 10 from McConnell
• 8 from Potter
• 7 from Nesmith
• 5 from Sheppard

The Pacers had a broader distribution than a one-star offense.

Their problem was not simply a lack of scoring options.

It was the efficiency of those options compared with what Los Angeles produced.

What the Match Says About Team Style

The statistical profile suggests two different offensive approaches.

Los Angeles relied heavily on efficient shot-making, particularly from three-point range, while Indiana generated more field-goal attempts and more assists.

The Pacers attempted 98 field goals.

The Lakers attempted only 85.

Yet Los Angeles still scored 128 points.

That is an excellent example of why shot quality and efficiency can matter more than raw volume.

A Closer Look at Possession Efficiency

Indiana’s low turnover total is one of the reasons the result is interesting.

The Pacers committed only seven turnovers.

Los Angeles committed 12.

Indiana also had more assists and more steals.

If someone looked only at turnovers, assists, and steals, they could reasonably expect Indiana to have competed much more closely.

But basketball is ultimately determined by points.

The Lakers generated enough efficient scoring to overcome those disadvantages.

Their 46% three-point shooting was the key factor.

Why the Lakers Won Despite Fewer Assists

The Lakers had 25 assists compared with 33 for Indiana.

That does not mean Los Angeles played poor offensive basketball.

Doncic’s ability to create his own shot reduced the need for every basket to come from an assist.

The Lakers also made 45 field goals on only 85 attempts.

Indiana made 46 on 98 attempts.

So although Indiana recorded more assists, Los Angeles was considerably more efficient with its shooting opportunities.

Why the Pacers Lost Despite 98 Field-Goal Attempts

Ninety-eight field-goal attempts is a large number.

The Pacers made 46 of them, meaning they shot 47%.

The problem was that their three-point shooting was poor.

Only eight of their 35 three-point attempts went in.

That 23% conversion rate significantly reduced the value of those attempts.

Meanwhile, the Lakers converted nearly half of their three-point attempts.

The difference between 23% and 46% from three was too large for Indiana to overcome.

Lakers vs Pacers Match Player Stats: Most Important Takeaways

The complete lakers vs pacers match player stats point toward several major conclusions.

First, Luka Doncic was the clear individual star.

Second, the Lakers’ supporting cast provided enough scoring to prevent Indiana from focusing exclusively on him.

Third, Los Angeles dominated the three-point battle.

Fourth, Indiana actually won several traditional statistical categories, including assists, steals, and turnovers.

Fifth, the Lakers’ shooting efficiency outweighed those disadvantages.

Sixth, the game was effectively shaped during the first three quarters, when Los Angeles built a 19-point advantage.

Seventh, Indiana’s fourth-quarter performance showed offensive resilience, but the deficit was too large to erase.

What Fans Should Look at Beyond the Final Score

If you are analyzing a game like this, the best approach is to avoid relying on one statistic.

Instead, consider five major areas:

1. Scoring volume: Who produced the points?
2. Shooting efficiency: How many attempts were needed?
3. Three-point production: Which team created more high-value shots?
4. Possession control: How did turnovers and rebounds affect opportunities?
5. Lineup impact: Which players helped their team during their minutes?

Using those categories gives a much more complete picture.

For this matchup, Doncic’s 44 points immediately stand out, but his 14-of-25 shooting and 7-of-14 three-point performance explain why the scoring was so valuable.

Kennard’s +26 shows the importance of bench efficiency.

Vanderbilt’s eight rebounds and three assists show why low scoring does not equal low impact.

Walker provides a similar example for Indiana with nine rebounds, five assists, and a +9 plus/minus despite scoring only 10 points.

Season Series Context

The matchup data provided shows the Lakers leading the season series 1-0 after the March 7 meeting.

The listed follow-up game was March 26, 2026, when the Pacers defeated the Lakers 130-137 according to the supplied data.

That later result is important when looking at the broader matchup because a single game does not necessarily define the relationship between two teams.

The March 7 contest should therefore be viewed as one specific snapshot of the teams rather than a complete statement about their overall strengths.

A Statistical Lesson From This Game

Perhaps the most useful lesson from this matchup is that basketball statistics must be interpreted together.

Indiana had:

• More field-goal attempts
• More made field goals
• More assists
• Fewer turnovers
• More steals
• More blocks

Yet the Pacers lost by 11.

Los Angeles had:

• Better field-goal percentage
• Far better three-point percentage
• More made three-pointers
• Better free-throw percentage
• More rebounds

The Lakers’ efficiency overcame Indiana’s possession advantages.

That is the central statistical story of the game.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points in the Lakers vs Pacers game?

Luka Doncic led all scorers with 44 points for the Lakers. He shot 14 of 25 from the field, 7 of 14 from three-point range, and 9 of 10 from the free-throw line.

What was the final score between the Lakers and Pacers?

The Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Indiana Pacers 128-117 on March 7, 2026, at crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles.

How many three-pointers did the Lakers make?

The Lakers made 17 of 37 three-point attempts, shooting 46% from beyond the arc.

How many three-pointers did the Pacers make?

The Pacers made 8 of 35 three-point attempts, shooting 23%.

Who led the Pacers in scoring?

Pascal Siakam led Indiana with 26 points. He shot 10 of 20 from the field and also recorded five rebounds, three assists, and two steals.

Which Lakers player had the best plus/minus?

Among the highlighted Lakers players, Luke Kennard recorded the best plus/minus at +26. Luka Doncic followed with +20.

Conclusion

The March 7, 2026 matchup between the Los Angeles Lakers and Indiana Pacers was a strong example of efficiency overcoming volume.

The Pacers produced more field-goal attempts, more assists, fewer turnovers, more steals, and more blocks. They also had 46 made field goals compared with 45 for Los Angeles.

But the Lakers converted their opportunities much more efficiently.

The decisive difference came from outside the arc. Los Angeles made 17 of 37 three-point attempts, while Indiana made only 8 of 35. That 27-point difference from made three-pointers created a significant scoring advantage that Indiana could not overcome.

Luka Doncic was the clear standout with 44 points, nine rebounds, five assists, three steals, and two blocks. His 7-of-14 three-point shooting made his performance especially difficult for Indiana to contain.

The supporting cast also mattered. Austin Reaves scored 19, Luke Kennard added 15, Rui Hachimura scored 13, and Marcus Smart contributed 11. Jarred Vanderbilt showed the value of non-scoring contributions with eight rebounds and three assists.

For Indiana, Pascal Siakam’s 26 points led the way, while Andrew Nembhard added 17 points and eight assists. Jay Huff and Jarace Walker also made meaningful contributions.

Ultimately, the lakers vs pacers match player stats show that the Lakers did not win because they dominated every statistical category. They won because their most valuable category, shooting efficiency, was dramatically better when it mattered most.