New York Jets vs Buffalo Bills Match Player Stats

The new york jets vs buffalo bills match player stats from January 5, 2026 tell a clear story of a one-sided AFC East contest. The Buffalo Bills defeated the New York Jets 35-8, finishing the regular season with a 12-5 record while the Jets ended at 3-14. The final score alone shows the gap between the teams, but the individual numbers explain how Buffalo controlled the game from start to finish.

Mitchell Trubisky was the central figure in Buffalo’s offensive performance. He completed 22 of 29 passes for 259 yards and four touchdowns without throwing an interception. His 142.1 passer rating and 90.7 QBR reflected an efficient performance that consistently converted Buffalo’s offensive opportunities into points.

New York had a much more difficult afternoon. Brady Cook completed 11 of 22 passes for only 60 yards, although he did throw one touchdown without an interception. He was also sacked once, and the Jets finished with only 69 rushing yards. Buffalo, by comparison, produced 211 rushing yards on 43 attempts.

Those numbers make the 35-8 result easier to understand. Buffalo did not rely on one isolated advantage. The Bills won through efficient passing, a strong rushing attack, sustained offensive production and a defense that kept New York from building momentum.

Table of Contents

New York Jets vs Buffalo Bills Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The January 5, 2026 meeting ended with Buffalo winning 35-8.

Category	New York Jets	Buffalo Bills
Final Score	8	35
Record	3-14	12-5
Home/Away Record	1-7 Away	7-2 Home
Passing Yards	60	259
Rushing Yards	69	211
Passing TDs	1	4
Interceptions	0	0
Sacks	1	0
Rushing Attempts	23	43
Rushing Average	3.0	4.9
Receiving Yards	60	259
Receiving TDs	1	4
Fumbles	0	0

The quarter-by-quarter scoring also shows how quickly the game moved away from New York.

Quarter	Jets	Bills
First	0	7
Second	0	14
Third	0	8
Fourth	8	6
Total	8	35

Buffalo scored in every quarter, while the Jets did not get on the scoreboard until the fourth.

That distinction matters. A late touchdown can make a final score look slightly closer than the overall contest actually was. Here, New York’s eight points came after Buffalo had already built a 29-point advantage.

Mitchell Trubisky Leads Buffalo’s Passing Attack

Mitchell Trubisky delivered the most productive passing performance in the game.

His final line was:

22 completions
29 attempts
259 passing yards
8.9 yards per attempt
4 touchdowns
0 interceptions
90.7 QBR
142.1 passer rating
0 sacks

The efficiency is particularly important.

Trubisky completed 22 of 29 attempts, which works out to approximately 75.9 percent completions. He also averaged 8.9 yards per attempt. That combination suggests Buffalo was not simply throwing short, low-risk passes to inflate completion numbers.

The four touchdown passes were the biggest difference between the quarterbacks.

Buffalo turned 22 completions into four passing touchdowns. New York managed one touchdown on 11 completions.

That is a major efficiency gap.

Trubisky also avoided the two mistakes that can quickly change the direction of an NFL game. He threw no interceptions and was not sacked. The Bills therefore finished their passing statistics without a turnover or sack charged to the quarterback.

Why Trubisky’s 142.1 Rating Stands Out

A passer rating of 142.1 is an extremely efficient statistical performance.

The number becomes even more meaningful when viewed beside the Jets’ 71.4 rating. The difference between the two quarterbacks was 70.7 passer-rating points.

This was not a case where one quarterback had slightly better numbers. Buffalo’s passing game produced substantially more yardage, more touchdowns, a better completion rate and a significantly higher rating.

For readers studying individual player performance, the most useful lesson is to look beyond passing yards alone. Trubisky’s 259 yards were important, but the four touchdowns and absence of turnovers explain much more about Buffalo’s scoring output.

Brady Cook’s Numbers Show the Jets’ Offensive Problems

Brady Cook finished with:

11 completions
22 attempts
60 passing yards
2.7 yards per attempt
1 touchdown
0 interceptions
1 sack
24.6 QBR
71.4 passer rating

There is one positive element that should not be ignored: Cook did not throw an interception.

However, avoiding turnovers was not enough to keep the Jets competitive because the offense struggled to generate yardage.

Cook’s 60 passing yards on 22 attempts produced an average of only 2.7 yards per attempt. That is the clearest statistical signal of New York’s passing difficulties.

His completion percentage was exactly 50 percent. Even when completions were made, they did not generate enough offense to consistently move the chains or create scoring opportunities.

The Jets’ single passing touchdown also came against a much larger overall offensive deficit.

The Biggest Difference Between the Quarterbacks

The quarterback comparison can be summarized simply:

Passing Metric	Brady Cook	Mitchell Trubisky
Completions	11	22
Attempts	22	29
Completion Rate	50.0%	75.9%
Yards	60	259
Yards/Attempt	2.7	8.9
Touchdowns	1	4
Interceptions	0	0
Sacks	1	0
Passer Rating	71.4	142.1
QBR	24.6	90.7

The contrast is striking.

Trubisky attempted only seven more passes than Cook but produced 199 additional passing yards and three more touchdown passes.

That is the type of efficiency difference that can decide an NFL game long before the final whistle.

Buffalo’s Running Game Created a Second Advantage

Buffalo did not need to win solely through the air.

The Bills ran the ball 43 times for 211 yards, averaging 4.9 yards per carry. Their longest run was 23 yards, and the team scored one rushing touchdown.

New York had 23 rushing attempts for 69 yards, an average of 3.0 yards per carry. The Jets’ longest run was only seven yards, and they did not record a rushing touchdown.

Rushing Category	Jets	Bills
Attempts	23	43
Yards	69	211
Average	3.0	4.9
Touchdowns	0	1
Longest Run	7	23

Buffalo therefore produced 142 more rushing yards than New York.

That is more than twice the Jets’ entire rushing total.

The Bills also ran the ball 20 more times. This indicates a meaningful difference in offensive balance and game control. When one team can run effectively while also passing efficiently, the opposing defense has fewer easy answers.

Why 211 Rushing Yards Matter

Rushing production has value beyond the raw yardage.

A successful running game can:

Keep an offense on schedule
Reduce pressure on the quarterback
Create favorable down-and-distance situations
Help sustain drives
Force defensive adjustments
Protect a lead in the second half

Buffalo’s 43 rushing attempts fit particularly well with the game’s scoring pattern. The Bills established a lead early, continued producing offensively and maintained their advantage throughout the contest.

The Jets never found a comparable foundation on the ground.

Receiving Production Mirrors the Passing Numbers

The receiving statistics closely match the quarterback statistics supplied for the game.

New York finished with:

11 receptions
60 receiving yards
5.5 yards per reception
1 receiving touchdown
13-yard longest reception
22 targets

Buffalo finished with:

22 receptions
259 receiving yards
11.8 yards per reception
4 receiving touchdowns
37-yard longest reception
28 targets

The difference in average yards per reception is especially useful.

Buffalo averaged 11.8 yards per reception, compared with 5.5 for New York.

That is more than a simple volume difference. Buffalo’s completed passes were substantially more productive on a per-reception basis.

The longest reception also favored Buffalo by a wide margin. The Bills recorded a 37-yard reception, while the Jets’ longest was 13 yards.

Buffalo Generated More Explosive Receiving Plays

Explosive plays can quickly alter an NFL scoreboard.

Buffalo’s 37-yard longest reception demonstrates its ability to create larger chunks of offense through the passing game. New York’s longest reception of 13 yards indicates a much more limited passing attack.

The Bills also received 28 targets compared with 22 for the Jets.

Despite only six additional targets, Buffalo produced 12 more receptions and 199 more receiving yards.

That is another way of seeing the same story: Buffalo’s passing offense was both more efficient and more productive.

The 35-8 Score Was Built Across Multiple Phases

One of the most important takeaways from the new york jets vs buffalo bills match player stats is that Buffalo did not win because of one isolated statistical category.

The Bills had advantages in:

Passing efficiency
Passing touchdowns
Rushing volume
Rushing yardage
Yards per rushing attempt
Receiving efficiency
Explosive receiving production
Quarter-by-quarter scoring

New York’s statistical positives were limited.

The Jets did avoid interceptions and fumbles, and they produced a fourth-quarter touchdown. Isaiah Williams also provided useful kick-return production.

But those positives did not compensate for the lack of offensive yardage.

Isaiah Williams Provides a Bright Spot for New York

Isaiah Williams was one of the more productive special teams contributors for the Jets.

He recorded:

5 kick returns
142 return yards
28.4 yards per return
49-yard longest return
0 touchdowns

His 142 return yards were more than double the Jets’ 60 passing yards.

That does not mean kick returns were the primary source of the Jets’ offense, but it does show that Williams created field-position value.

His 49-yard longest return was also the most explosive return play listed in the Jets’ statistics.

For a team that struggled to move the ball offensively, strong return production can create valuable opportunities. The problem for New York was that the offense could not consistently turn those opportunities into points.

Buffalo’s Return Game Was Limited but Clean

Ray Davis recorded Buffalo’s only listed kick return:

1 return
22 yards
22.0-yard average
22-yard longest return
0 touchdowns

Keon Coleman also recorded one punt return for two yards.

Neither return category produced a touchdown, but Buffalo did not need a major special teams scoring play to win.

The Bills’ offense generated enough production through passing and rushing to control the game.

That is an important distinction when evaluating special teams statistics. A team does not need spectacular return numbers when its offense is already producing efficiently.

Punting and Field Position

Austin McNamara handled New York’s punting duties.

His final statistics were:

5 punts
211 total yards
42.2-yard average
50-yard longest punt
0 touchbacks
2 punts inside the 20

The two punts inside the 20 show some ability to influence field position, although the overall game situation meant New York was frequently operating from a disadvantage.

Buffalo had no listed punting statistics in the supplied data.

This is another subtle indication of the game script. When a team consistently sustains drives and converts offensive opportunities, it has fewer reasons to rely on its punter.

Kicking Statistics

Matt Prater handled Buffalo’s kicking responsibilities.

He made all three extra-point attempts and finished with three points.

His field-goal line was 0 of 0, meaning Buffalo did not attempt a field goal in the supplied statistics.

The three successful extra points correspond with three of Buffalo’s four listed touchdowns being followed by successful extra points. The fourth touchdown account is reflected within the game’s scoring data, while the supplied kicking statistics show three successful extra points.

New York had no listed kicking statistics.

Turnovers Were Surprisingly Absent

The turnover column is one of the quieter but important parts of the game.

Neither team recorded a fumble.

Neither team recorded an interception.

That means Buffalo’s 35 points were not created by a conventional turnover advantage.

This matters because turnovers often explain blowout scores. Here, the Bills produced their advantage through sustained offensive efficiency instead.

Buffalo’s offense generated 259 passing yards and 211 rushing yards without giving the ball away through an interception or fumble.

The Jets also protected the football, but they could not translate that protection into enough yardage or points.

No Turnovers Does Not Always Mean a Close Game

This game is a good example of why turnover statistics should be interpreted in context.

A team can protect the football and still lose decisively if it cannot generate enough first downs, yardage or scoring opportunities.

New York had zero interceptions and zero fumbles, yet lost by 27 points.

Buffalo also had zero turnovers, but unlike New York, it combined ball security with high offensive efficiency.

That combination is much more valuable than ball security by itself.

Quarter-by-Quarter Analysis

The scoring sequence provides a useful way to understand the game.

First Quarter: Buffalo Establishes Control

Buffalo scored seven points in the opening quarter while New York remained scoreless.

A 7-0 first-quarter deficit is not normally decisive in an NFL game, but it becomes significant when the trailing team cannot respond offensively.

The Jets’ eventual passing and rushing numbers suggest that early offensive limitations continued rather than disappearing.

Second Quarter: The Gap Expands

The Bills added 14 points in the second quarter.

The Jets again scored zero.

At halftime, Buffalo had built a 21-0 lead.

That was the critical point of the game.

New York entered the second half needing multiple scoring drives just to become competitive. Buffalo, meanwhile, could operate with the advantage of an already established lead.

Third Quarter: Buffalo Reaches 29

The Bills added eight more points in the third quarter.

The Jets again failed to score.

The result was a 29-0 Buffalo advantage heading into the final quarter.

At that point, the outcome was effectively settled.

Fourth Quarter: New York Finally Scores

The Jets scored eight points in the fourth quarter.

Buffalo added six.

The Jets’ late scoring prevented a shutout, but it did not materially change the result.

The final 35-8 score therefore reflects both Buffalo’s sustained dominance and New York’s inability to generate offense until the game was already out of reach.

What the Numbers Say About Offensive Efficiency

The most revealing comparison is total offensive yardage.

Buffalo recorded:

259 passing yards
211 rushing yards
470 combined passing and rushing yards

New York recorded:

60 passing yards
69 rushing yards
129 combined passing and rushing yards

That means Buffalo produced 341 more yards of passing and rushing offense.

Buffalo’s total was more than three times New York’s total.

This is perhaps the clearest statistical explanation for the 27-point margin.

The Bills did not simply edge the Jets in one area. They overwhelmed them in overall offensive production.

A Closer Look at Efficiency

Raw yardage is useful, but efficiency often reveals more.

Buffalo averaged:

8.9 yards per pass attempt
4.9 yards per rush
11.8 yards per reception

New York averaged:

2.7 yards per pass attempt
3.0 yards per rush
5.5 yards per reception

Every major offensive efficiency figure supplied in the data favors Buffalo.

That consistency is significant.

If Buffalo had gained 470 yards because of one unusually long play, the interpretation would be different. Instead, the Bills showed advantages across passing, rushing and receiving efficiency.

Why the Passing Gap Was So Important

The difference between 259 and 60 passing yards is enormous.

Buffalo gained 199 more passing yards while attempting only seven more passes.

That means the difference was primarily about effectiveness rather than volume.

Trubisky averaged 8.9 yards per attempt.

Cook averaged 2.7.

The 6.2-yard difference per attempt is substantial.

Across 20 to 30 attempts, a gap of that size can translate into a huge difference in total offensive production.

The four-to-one difference in passing touchdowns further magnified the effect.

Why the Rushing Gap Also Mattered

Buffalo’s 211 rushing yards ensured that the Bills were not dependent on passing success.

The 43 rushing attempts also gave Buffalo a reliable way to maintain offensive balance.

New York’s 69 rushing yards were not enough to provide the same support.

The Jets averaged only 3.0 yards per carry and had a longest run of seven yards. That makes it difficult to consistently create favorable down-and-distance situations.

Buffalo’s 4.9-yard average and 23-yard longest run show a much stronger ability to generate meaningful gains.

Player Stats Should Be Read in Game Context

A common mistake when examining box scores is to evaluate individual statistics without considering the game situation.

For example, Brady Cook’s zero interceptions might initially look positive.

It is positive from a ball-security perspective.

But when combined with 60 passing yards, 2.7 yards per attempt and a 71.4 passer rating, it becomes clear that avoiding turnovers did not solve the Jets’ larger offensive problem.

The same principle applies to Isaiah Williams’ 142 return yards.

Those were useful numbers, but return yardage does not have the same value as sustained offensive production.

On the Buffalo side, Trubisky’s 259 passing yards become more impressive because they came with four touchdowns and no interceptions.

The context makes the numbers meaningful.

New York Jets vs Buffalo Bills Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways

The new york jets vs buffalo bills match player stats point to several major conclusions.

1. Buffalo’s quarterback was dramatically more efficient

Trubisky completed 75.9 percent of his passes, averaged 8.9 yards per attempt and threw four touchdowns.

Cook completed 50 percent, averaged 2.7 yards per attempt and threw one touchdown.

2. Buffalo dominated on the ground

The Bills gained 211 rushing yards compared with 69 for the Jets.

They also averaged 4.9 yards per carry compared with 3.0.

3. Buffalo created much more receiving value

The Bills averaged 11.8 yards per reception.

The Jets averaged 5.5.

Buffalo also produced a 37-yard reception compared with New York’s 13-yard longest catch.

4. New York did have a special teams bright spot

Isaiah Williams recorded 142 kick-return yards, including a 49-yard return.

5. Turnovers did not explain the final score

Neither team had an interception or fumble.

Buffalo won because it generated far more offense rather than because it repeatedly received short fields from turnovers.

6. The game was effectively decided before halftime

Buffalo led 21-0 at halftime and 29-0 after three quarters.

New York’s eight points came in the fourth quarter.

A Practical Way to Analyze Similar NFL Box Scores

If you are using player statistics to understand another NFL game, a useful process is to work through five questions.

Start With the Quarterbacks

Look at completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdowns, interceptions and sacks.

Do not rely on passing yards alone.

Check the Running Game

Compare attempts, yards, average and longest run.

A team that controls the ground game can influence both possession and defensive matchups.

Examine Receiving Efficiency

Look at receptions, targets, yards per reception and explosive plays.

This can reveal whether a passing attack is creating meaningful gains or simply accumulating short completions.

Review Turnovers

Interceptions and fumbles can dramatically change a game.

But as this Jets-Bills matchup demonstrates, a team can win decisively without forcing a turnover.

Finally, Read the Scoring by Quarter

The quarter-by-quarter breakdown explains game flow.

A 35-8 final score is much different if one team scores 21 points in the fourth quarter than if it builds a 29-0 lead through three quarters.

Here, the latter happened.

What Fans Should Take From the Final Statistics

The biggest lesson from this matchup is that a final score becomes far more informative when supported by the underlying numbers.

Buffalo’s 35 points were supported by 470 passing and rushing yards.

The Bills produced four passing touchdowns and one rushing touchdown.

They averaged 8.9 yards per pass attempt and 4.9 yards per rush.

They also avoided turnovers.

New York produced only 129 combined passing and rushing yards.

The Jets averaged 2.7 yards per pass attempt and 3.0 yards per rush.

Their offense did not commit a turnover, but it also could not create enough yardage to stay in the game.

That is why the most useful reading of this box score is not simply “Buffalo won 35-8.” The deeper explanation is that Buffalo consistently generated positive offensive plays while New York struggled to create sustained production.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Jets vs Bills game on January 5, 2026?

The Buffalo Bills defeated the New York Jets 35-8 on January 5, 2026.

What were Mitchell Trubisky’s stats against the Jets?

Mitchell Trubisky completed 22 of 29 passes for 259 yards, four touchdowns and zero interceptions. He recorded an 8.9 yards-per-attempt average, a 90.7 QBR and a 142.1 passer rating.

What were Brady Cook’s stats against the Bills?

Brady Cook completed 11 of 22 passes for 60 yards, one touchdown and zero interceptions. He averaged 2.7 yards per attempt and recorded a 71.4 passer rating and 24.6 QBR.

How many rushing yards did the Bills have?

Buffalo had 211 rushing yards on 43 attempts, averaging 4.9 yards per carry. The Bills’ longest rushing play was 23 yards, and they scored one rushing touchdown.

How many rushing yards did the Jets have?

New York had 69 rushing yards on 23 attempts, averaging 3.0 yards per carry. The Jets’ longest rushing play was seven yards, and they did not score a rushing touchdown.

Did either team throw an interception?

No. Neither the Jets nor the Bills recorded an interception in the supplied game statistics. Neither team recorded a fumble either.

Conclusion

The new york jets vs buffalo bills match player stats provide a detailed explanation for Buffalo’s 35-8 victory.

Mitchell Trubisky led an efficient passing attack, throwing for 259 yards and four touchdowns without an interception. Buffalo also added 211 rushing yards, giving the Bills 470 combined passing and rushing yards.

The Jets produced only 129 combined passing and rushing yards. Brady Cook avoided interceptions but finished with 60 passing yards, while New York’s rushing attack managed 69 yards.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring makes the result even clearer. Buffalo led 7-0 after one quarter, 21-0 at halftime and 29-0 after three quarters. New York scored all eight of its points in the fourth quarter.

Isaiah Williams’ 142 kick-return yards were a notable individual contribution for New York, while Matt Prater converted all three of Buffalo’s extra-point attempts.

Ultimately, the statistical story is one of efficiency, balance and sustained production. Buffalo was better through the air, better on the ground and more effective at turning offensive possessions into touchdowns. The absence of turnovers on either side makes that conclusion even stronger because the Bills’ advantage came primarily from execution rather than defensive giveaways.

For anyone reviewing this matchup, the most important figures are not just the final score or one player’s headline number. The combination of 259 passing yards, 211 rushing yards, four passing touchdowns, a 142.1 passer rating and zero turnovers explains why Buffalo controlled the game so thoroughly.

The new york jets vs buffalo bills match player stats therefore offer a useful example of how individual player production, team efficiency and game flow work together to explain an NFL result.