Washington Commanders vs Dallas Cowboys Match Player Stats
The washington commanders vs dallas cowboys match player stats from the December 25, 2025 Christmas Day meeting tell a much more detailed story than the 30-23 final score alone. Dallas won because Dak Prescott produced 307 passing yards and two touchdowns, Malik Davis stepped into a major rushing role with 103 yards, and the Cowboys converted six fourth downs without failing on any of them. Washington stayed competitive through Jacory Croskey-Merritt’s explosive 105 rushing yards and two touchdowns, but Josh Johnson’s offense could not generate a passing touchdown. The official NFL recap also confirms Dallas scored touchdowns on its first three possessions and ultimately finished 6-for-6 on fourth down.
The game was a useful example of why individual statistics need context. Dallas finished with 211 rushing yards and 307 passing yards, while Washington produced 138 rushing yards and 198 passing yards. Yet Washington actually generated several disruptive defensive numbers, including six sacks and 11 quarterback hits. The difference was that Dallas consistently converted important situations, protected its lead when it mattered, and found explosive plays at key moments.
This breakdown examines the major offensive, defensive, special teams, and situational numbers from the matchup. It also explains what those statistics reveal about how the game was actually won.
washington commanders vs dallas cowboys match player stats: Game Overview
The Cowboys entered the Christmas Day matchup with a 7-8-1 record, while Washington entered at 4-12. Dallas ultimately secured a 30-23 victory, improving its record to 7-8-1 immediately after the game while Washington remained 4-12 at that point in the season. The final score was not decided by one isolated statistic. Instead, Dallas combined efficient passing, a strong rushing workload, explosive receiving plays, and outstanding fourth-down execution.
The scoring progression also shows how the game developed.
| Quarter | Dallas Cowboys | Washington Commanders |
| First | 7 | 3 |
| Second | 17 | 7 |
| Third | 3 | 10 |
| Fourth | 3 | 3 |
| Final | 30 | 23 |
Dallas established control early. The Cowboys scored 7 points in the first quarter and then added 17 in the second, giving them a 24-10 halftime advantage based on the supplied game data. Washington responded with a strong third quarter, scoring 10 points while limiting Dallas to three.
That comeback attempt made the fourth quarter important. Dallas added another field goal, Washington answered with a field goal, and the Cowboys held on for the seven-point victory.
The official NFL game center records the same 30-23 result and confirms the scoring sequence.
How Dallas Won the Game
The most important lesson from this matchup is that Dallas was not simply better because it accumulated more yards. Washington’s defense actually created significant pressure.
The Cowboys won because they consistently converted high-value opportunities.
Six fourth-down conversions changed the game
Dallas went 6-for-6 on fourth down.
That is one of the clearest indicators of situational execution in the entire game. A team can accumulate yards between the 20-yard lines, but fourth-down conversions directly extend drives and prevent the opponent from getting possession.
The NFL noted that Dallas’s six fourth-down conversions were tied for the most in a game since 1991 and were the most in that span by a team that converted every fourth-down attempt.
This is particularly important because Washington generated six sacks and 11 quarterback hits. The Commanders were therefore capable of disrupting Dallas’s passing game, but the Cowboys repeatedly answered when the down and distance became critical.
Dallas attacked early
The Cowboys scored touchdowns on their first three possessions, according to the NFL’s game recap. That early success created a difficult situation for Washington because the Commanders were forced to play from behind against a Dallas offense capable of using both Prescott’s arm and its rushing attack.
Early scoring also changes play-calling.
A team protecting a lead can become more comfortable running the ball, shortening the game, and accepting field goals. That is largely what happened as the contest moved into its later stages.
Dak Prescott’s Passing Performance
Dak Prescott was the statistical leader of the Dallas passing attack.
His final numbers were:
| Statistic | Dak Prescott |
| Completions | 19 |
| Attempts | 37 |
| Completion Percentage | 51.4% |
| Passing Yards | 307 |
| Passing TDs | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 6 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 38 |
| Passer Rating | 97.5 |
Prescott’s 307 passing yards were especially significant because Washington’s defense generated six sacks. The pressure did not prevent Dallas from producing explosive passing plays.
His two touchdown passes were also valuable because Dallas did not need to rely exclusively on field goals to finish drives.
The official NFL statistics confirm that Prescott completed 19 of 37 passes for 307 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions while taking six sacks for 38 yards.
The pressure tells another story
A 19-for-37 passing line is not particularly efficient in terms of completion percentage. Prescott completed approximately 51.4% of his attempts.
However, looking only at completion percentage would miss the larger picture.
Dallas still generated 307 passing yards, which means its successful completions produced substantial yardage. The Cowboys also avoided interceptions.
That combination matters. A quarterback can have a lower completion rate and still create a winning passing performance if the offense generates explosive gains and avoids turnover mistakes.
Prescott also made an important late-game throw to George Pickens. The NFL reported that Prescott connected with Pickens for 21 yards on Dallas’s final possession before the Cowboys eventually closed out the game.
Josh Johnson’s Performance for Washington
Josh Johnson started at quarterback for Washington and finished with:
| Statistic | Josh Johnson |
| Completions | 15 |
| Attempts | 23 |
| Completion Percentage | 65.2% |
| Passing Yards | 198 |
| Passing TDs | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 8 |
| Passer Rating | 92.3 |
Johnson’s 65.2% completion rate was better than Prescott’s 51.4%, but completion percentage alone does not explain the outcome.
Johnson avoided turnovers and was relatively efficient with his attempts. The problem was the lack of touchdown production through the air.
The Commanders needed more scoring from the passing game because Dallas had already built a substantial lead.
The NFL noted that Johnson was making his first start since 2021 and completed 15 of 23 passes for 198 yards without a touchdown or interception.
Why the passing comparison is interesting
At first glance, Washington’s quarterback statistics look competitive.
Johnson:
- Completed a higher percentage of passes
- Took only one sack
- Threw no interceptions
Prescott:
- Completed a lower percentage
- Took six sacks
- Threw two touchdowns
Yet Prescott’s offense produced 30 points.
This is a useful reminder that quarterback evaluation should include scoring efficiency, explosive plays, situational conversions, and offensive context rather than focusing on completion percentage alone.
Malik Davis Became a Major Factor
One of the most important developments in the game was Malik Davis’s rushing performance.
Davis carried the ball 20 times for 103 yards.
| Statistic | Malik Davis |
| Carries | 20 |
| Rushing Yards | 103 |
| Average | 5.2 yards |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long Run | 21 yards |
His 5.2 yards per carry gave Dallas a reliable rushing option, especially after Javonte Williams left the game with a shoulder injury.
The NFL reported that Williams had 54 rushing yards and a touchdown before leaving in the first half. Davis then established career highs in both carries and rushing yards, finishing with 103 yards on 20 attempts.
That development was important because Dallas did not need Prescott to carry every possession through the air.
Once Davis became productive, Dallas could continue moving the chains with the running game.
Why Davis’s workload mattered
Twenty carries is more than simply a box-score number.
A sustained rushing workload can:
- Reduce pressure on the quarterback.
- Keep the defense honest.
- Control clock possession.
- Create manageable down-and-distance situations.
- Help protect a lead.
- Reduce the number of pure passing situations.
Davis averaged 5.2 yards per carry, meaning Dallas did not have to force the run simply to consume clock. The rushing attack was actually productive.
Jacory Croskey-Merritt Was Washington’s Offensive Spark
Washington’s best rushing performance came from Jacory Croskey-Merritt.
He recorded:
| Statistic | Jacory Croskey-Merritt |
| Carries | 11 |
| Rushing Yards | 105 |
| Average | 9.5 yards |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Long Run | 72 yards |
His 9.5 yards per carry was outstanding.
Even more important was the 72-yard touchdown run in the third quarter.
That play helped Washington turn a game that had been heavily controlled by Dallas into a competitive fourth-quarter contest.
The NFL reported that the 72-yard touchdown accounted for most of Croskey-Merritt’s 105 rushing yards and that he reached a top speed of 21.62 miles per hour on the play.
Explosive plays kept Washington alive
Washington’s overall rushing line was only 138 yards on 16 attempts, but that statistic becomes much more meaningful when paired with the 72-yard touchdown.
Without that explosive play, the average would look dramatically different.
This is one of the most important lessons from the game. A small number of explosive plays can heavily influence a team’s average statistics.
Croskey-Merritt averaged 9.5 yards per carry because he combined productive rushing with one enormous gain.
Team Rushing Comparison
The team rushing statistics show a clear Dallas advantage in volume.
| Team | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Dallas Cowboys | 44 | 211 | 4.8 | 1 | 21 |
| Washington Commanders | 16 | 138 | 8.6 | 2 | 72 |
Dallas ran the ball 28 more times than Washington.
That difference is enormous.
Washington actually averaged more yards per carry, 8.6 compared with Dallas’s 4.8. But Dallas accumulated 73 more rushing yards because it maintained a much larger rushing workload.
This is a perfect example of why volume and efficiency should be analyzed together.
Washington’s rushing attack was explosive.
Dallas’s rushing attack was sustained.
Those are different strengths.
Dallas Receiving Production
Dallas produced 307 passing yards on 19 completions. One of the biggest individual highlights came from KaVontae Turpin.
Turpin recorded:
| Statistic | KaVontae Turpin |
| Receptions | 1 |
| Receiving Yards | 86 |
| Average | 86.0 yards |
| Long | 86 yards |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
His 86-yard touchdown reception was one of the defining plays of the game.
One reception produced 86 yards and a touchdown, showing exactly how explosive Dallas could be.
The NFL specifically identified Prescott’s touchdown connection with Turpin as an 86-yard scoring play during the second quarter.
Why Turpin’s one reception mattered so much
A one-catch performance normally does not look impressive.
But this is where raw reception totals can be misleading.
Turpin’s single reception generated:
- 86 receiving yards
- One touchdown
- A major field-position swing
- A significant contribution to Dallas’s early lead
The correct way to evaluate his performance is therefore not to say that he had only one catch. The better interpretation is that he provided one of the game’s most important explosive plays.
Washington Receiving Production
Deebo Samuel Sr. was Washington’s leading receiver based on the supplied statistics.
His receiving line was:
| Statistic | Deebo Samuel Sr. |
| Receptions | 2 |
| Receiving Yards | 68 |
| Average | 34.0 yards |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long | 41 yards |
Samuel also contributed as a runner.
The NFL reported that he produced a 41-yard catch and a 29-yard run, giving Washington another source of explosive offense.
His involvement shows Washington’s effort to create offense in different ways.
When a team is playing with a backup or emergency quarterback situation, manufactured touches can become more valuable. Short throws, designed runs, and opportunities in space can reduce the burden on the quarterback.
Samuel’s contribution fit that approach.
The Passing and Receiving Numbers Need Context
The supplied data lists the Dallas team receiving line as 19 receptions for 307 yards and two touchdowns, with 36 targets.
These numbers correspond to the Dallas passing production rather than representing a single receiver’s statistics. The same distinction applies to Washington’s team passing line of 15 completions for 198 yards.
For accuracy, it is useful to separate team passing totals from individual receiving totals.
That prevents a common mistake in sports articles where a team’s passing yardage is accidentally presented as one receiver’s production.
Defensive Statistics
The defensive numbers provide one of the most interesting contrasts in this matchup.
| Statistic | Dallas | Washington |
| Total Tackles | 52 | 95 |
| Solo Tackles | 23 | 45 |
| Sacks | 2 | 6 |
| Tackles for Loss | 6 | 4 |
| Passes Defended | 3 | 8 |
| QB Hits | 6 | 11 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
Washington produced significantly more tackles, sacks, passes defended, and quarterback hits.
Yet Dallas won.
That tells us something important about defensive statistics.
Pressure does not automatically equal victory
Washington’s six sacks were three times Dallas’s two.
The Commanders also generated 11 quarterback hits compared with six by Dallas.
Those are strong pressure numbers.
But pressure only becomes truly valuable when it results in lost possessions, stalled drives, turnovers, or points prevented.
Washington recorded no interceptions and no fumbles.
Dallas also had no interceptions or fumbles.
The turnover battle was therefore completely even.
Jer’Zhan Newton’s performance stood out
The NFL highlighted Jer’Zhan Newton’s performance as a major positive for Washington, reporting that he recorded 3.0 sacks and eight quarterback pressures.
That is an especially notable defensive performance in a losing effort.
Newton’s pressure repeatedly disrupted Prescott, but Dallas compensated by converting critical fourth downs and producing explosive plays.
Turnovers Were Not the Difference
Neither team recorded an interception.
Neither team lost a fumble.
That means the turnover differential was:
Dallas: 0
Washington: 0
This is significant because many close NFL games are decided by turnovers.
That was not the case here.
Instead, the deciding factors were execution on fourth down, explosive plays, touchdown production, and Dallas’s ability to maintain offensive balance.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams also contributed meaningful points.
Brandon Aubrey
Dallas kicker Brandon Aubrey finished:
| Statistic | Brandon Aubrey |
| Field Goals | 3/4 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 75% |
| Long Field Goal | 52 yards |
| Extra Points | 3/3 |
| Total Points | 12 |
Aubrey scored 12 points.
That made him responsible for a substantial part of Dallas’s 30-point total.
Jake Moody
Washington kicker Jake Moody was perfect on field goals:
| Statistic | Jake Moody |
| Field Goals | 3/3 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 100% |
| Long Field Goal | 51 yards |
| Extra Points | 2/2 |
| Total Points | 11 |
Moody’s 51-yard field goal in the fourth quarter cut Dallas’s lead to 30-23. The NFL’s official highlight confirms the 51-yard kick narrowed the margin late in the fourth quarter.
That kick ensured the game remained a one-score contest.
Kick Return Statistics
KaVontae Turpin also contributed in the return game.
Dallas
Turpin recorded:
- 5 kick returns
- 115 return yards
- 23.0-yard average
- 26-yard long return
Washington
Chase Edmonds recorded:
- 4 kick returns
- 90 yards
- 22.5-yard average
- 27-yard long return
Chris Moore added:
- 1 return
- 33 yards
The return numbers were relatively competitive, so special teams field-position production was not overwhelmingly one-sided.
Punting Comparison
Dallas punter Bryan Anger had:
- 1 punt
- 53 yards
- 53.0-yard average
- 53-yard long
Washington punter Tress Way recorded:
- 3 punts
- 130 yards
- 43.3-yard average
- 53-yard long
- 3 punts inside the 20-yard line
Washington’s three punts inside the 20 showed strong directional and field-position work, but Dallas’s offensive success meant it did not need to punt frequently.
That is an important distinction.
A punter’s statistics can sometimes look excellent simply because the offense repeatedly failed to finish drives. Dallas’s one-punt total instead reflects how often the Cowboys kept possessions alive.
First-Half Control Was Crucial
Dallas’s 24-10 halftime advantage was the foundation of the victory.
The Cowboys did not need to dominate every quarter.
They needed to build a lead large enough to withstand Washington’s response.
The second half demonstrated why that strategy mattered.
Washington outscored Dallas 10-3 in the third quarter, cutting into the deficit. The Commanders then added another three points in the fourth.
But Dallas continued to score when necessary.
That is often what separates a comfortable lead from a collapse.
Third Quarter Belonged to Washington
Washington’s 10-point third quarter was its best sustained scoring period.
Croskey-Merritt’s 72-yard touchdown run was the defining moment.
The play demonstrated Washington’s ability to turn a single successful run into a major change in game state.
Dallas had entered halftime with a substantial advantage. Suddenly, Washington had momentum.
However, the Cowboys answered with enough offensive execution to prevent the comeback from becoming complete.
Fourth-Down Execution Was the Hidden Story
The final score is 30-23.
The headline players are Prescott, Davis, Croskey-Merritt, Turpin, and Newton.
But the most unusual statistic may be Dallas going 6-for-6 on fourth down.
That number deserves special attention because fourth-down attempts are high-leverage plays.
A successful conversion extends a drive.
A failed conversion usually gives the opponent possession.
Dallas repeatedly chose to stay aggressive and was rewarded.
The NFL reported that Dallas eventually went 6-for-6 on fourth down, including a later conversion involving Jalen Tolbert and a final quarterback sneak by Prescott to move the chains.
That is a strong example of situational football influencing the outcome more than traditional box-score totals.
What the Player Stats Say About Dallas
Several conclusions emerge from Dallas’s statistical profile.
The Cowboys had balance
Dallas recorded 211 rushing yards and 307 passing yards.
That means the offense produced 518 yards of combined rushing and passing production from the supplied team totals.
The Cowboys were not forced into a one-dimensional offensive approach.
Dallas created explosive passing plays
Turpin’s 86-yard touchdown was the obvious example.
Prescott’s 307 passing yards also indicate that Dallas continued to generate meaningful gains despite Washington’s pressure.
Dallas protected the football
The Cowboys had no interceptions and no fumbles.
That allowed the offense to maintain possession opportunities.
Dallas converted when the stakes were highest
Six fourth-down conversions on six attempts were arguably the most important situational statistic in the game.
What the Player Stats Say About Washington
Washington’s numbers tell a different but equally interesting story.
The Commanders had explosive rushing ability
Croskey-Merritt’s 105 yards on 11 carries were excellent.
His 72-yard touchdown demonstrated game-breaking speed.
The defense created pressure
Six sacks and 11 quarterback hits show that Washington’s defense was capable of disrupting Dallas’s passing game.
The offense lacked passing touchdowns
Johnson threw for 198 yards but no touchdowns.
That limitation made it difficult for Washington to fully capitalize on its defensive pressure.
The team stayed competitive
Despite falling behind early, Washington scored 10 points in the third quarter and three in the fourth.
The final seven-point margin shows that the Commanders did not simply disappear after Dallas’s fast start.
Key Statistical Matchups
The most revealing comparisons can be summarized like this:
| Category | Dallas | Washington | Edge |
| Final Score | 30 | 23 | Dallas |
| Passing Yards | 307 | 198 | Dallas |
| Rushing Yards | 211 | 138 | Dallas |
| Rushing Attempts | 44 | 16 | Dallas |
| Sacks | 2 | 6 | Washington |
| QB Hits | 6 | 11 | Washington |
| Turnovers | 0 | 0 | Even |
| Fourth Downs | 6/6 | Not specified | Dallas |
| Field Goals | 3/4 | 3/3 | Washington efficiency |
| Passing TDs | 2 | 0 | Dallas |
| Rushing TDs | 1 | 2 | Washington |
This table captures why the game was more competitive than the final score might suggest.
Washington won several defensive categories.
Dallas won the categories most closely connected to offensive production and game control.
The Most Important Individual Performances
If the goal is to identify the players who most influenced the result, the list starts with five names.
Dak Prescott
Prescott produced 307 yards and two passing touchdowns without throwing an interception.
His performance was not flawless because Washington’s defense sacked him six times.
But he made enough high-value throws to keep Dallas ahead.
Malik Davis
Davis responded to an unexpected change in the backfield with 103 yards on 20 carries.
His ability to maintain the rushing attack prevented Dallas from becoming too dependent on Prescott.
KaVontae Turpin
One reception.
Eighty-six yards.
One touchdown.
That is an unusually efficient impact profile.
Jacory Croskey-Merritt
Croskey-Merritt produced 105 yards on 11 carries and scored two touchdowns.
His 72-yard touchdown was one of Washington’s biggest offensive plays of the afternoon.
Jer’Zhan Newton
Newton recorded 3.0 sacks and eight quarterback pressures, according to the NFL recap.
His performance demonstrates that a defender can have a major individual impact even when the team ultimately loses.
Why the Box Score Can Be Misleading
A simple box-score reading might suggest Washington played better defensively because the Commanders recorded six sacks.
It might also suggest Washington had the more efficient rushing attack because its 8.6 yards per carry exceeded Dallas’s 4.8.
Both statements are true.
But neither explains the result.
Dallas had 44 rushing attempts compared with Washington’s 16. That volume helped the Cowboys accumulate more rushing yards and sustain their offensive balance.
Likewise, Prescott’s completion percentage was only 51.4%, but his 307 yards and two touchdowns were enough to support a 30-point offensive performance.
The broader lesson is that individual statistics must be interpreted according to game situation.
A Better Way to Read These Player Stats
For readers researching this matchup, there are five numbers worth prioritizing.
1. 307 passing yards
This shows the ceiling of Dallas’s passing attack despite Washington’s pressure.
2. 211 rushing yards
This demonstrates Dallas’s offensive balance and ability to control the game on the ground.
3. Six fourth-down conversions
This explains how Dallas repeatedly extended possessions.
4. 105 rushing yards from Croskey-Merritt
This identifies Washington’s most productive runner and one of its biggest offensive bright spots.
5. Six sacks by Washington
This explains why the game was competitive and highlights the Commanders’ defensive success even in defeat.
Together, these five statistics provide a much more complete picture than simply looking at the 30-23 final score.
Real Football Takeaway From the Matchup
From a game-analysis perspective, the most interesting aspect was the contrast between efficiency and disruption.
Washington disrupted Dallas.
Dallas still executed.
The Commanders generated six sacks, 11 quarterback hits, and eight passes defended. Yet Dallas threw two touchdowns, avoided turnovers, rushed for 211 yards, and converted every fourth-down opportunity.
That combination is difficult to overcome.
Washington’s offensive comeback was powered by explosive rushing. But explosive plays alone could not erase the early deficit.
The game therefore became a study in complementary football.
Dallas created an early lead.
Washington produced pressure and explosive runs.
Dallas responded with situational execution.
Washington remained within one score.
Dallas ultimately closed the game.
Where Washington Could Have Improved
The statistics point toward several areas.
More consistent passing production
Johnson’s 198 yards were respectable, but the absence of passing touchdowns limited Washington’s scoring ceiling.
Better response to Dallas’s fourth-down decisions
Dallas’s perfect fourth-down record shows that Washington repeatedly failed to end possessions when it had the opportunity.
Avoiding early deficits
The first half put Washington in a difficult position.
The Commanders showed they could compete after halftime, but recovering from a large deficit requires nearly flawless football.
Where Dallas Could Have Improved
The Cowboys also had clear weaknesses.
Pass protection
Six sacks for 38 yards lost is a substantial amount of negative yardage.
Washington’s defensive front repeatedly created pressure.
Passing efficiency
Prescott’s 19 completions on 37 attempts produced a completion rate just above 51%.
A more efficient passing game would have made Dallas’s victory more comfortable.
Red-zone finishing
Dallas converted field-goal opportunities through Aubrey, but leaving points available in the red zone can become dangerous against a team capable of explosive plays.
Official Source for the Match
For readers who want to verify the final score, game sequence, and official statistics, the NFL official game center provides the authoritative game record for Dallas at Washington in Week 17.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Washington Commanders and Dallas Cowboys?
The Dallas Cowboys defeated the Washington Commanders 30-23 on December 25, 2025.
Who was the leading passer in the game?
Dak Prescott led all passers with 307 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions on 19 completions in 37 attempts.
Who led the game in rushing?
Jacory Croskey-Merritt led Washington with 105 rushing yards on 11 carries and two touchdowns. Dallas’s Malik Davis rushed for 103 yards on 20 carries.
Who had the biggest receiving play?
KaVontae Turpin recorded an 86-yard touchdown reception, which was the longest receiving play listed in the supplied statistics.
How many sacks did Washington record?
Washington recorded six sacks, compared with two sacks by Dallas.
Did either team record a turnover?
No. Neither Dallas nor Washington recorded an interception or lost a fumble in the supplied game statistics.
Conclusion
The washington commanders vs dallas cowboys match player stats show a game that was decided by more than the final 30-23 score.
Dak Prescott delivered 307 passing yards and two touchdowns while avoiding interceptions. Malik Davis provided 103 rushing yards after taking on a larger role in the backfield. KaVontae Turpin supplied an explosive 86-yard touchdown reception.
Washington had its own major contributors. Jacory Croskey-Merritt rushed for 105 yards and two touchdowns, including a 72-yard scoring run. Deebo Samuel Sr. added explosive receiving and rushing contributions, while Jer’Zhan Newton produced 3.0 sacks and eight quarterback pressures.
The statistical contrast is what makes this matchup especially useful to study. Washington generated more defensive pressure, but Dallas converted six of six fourth-down opportunities. Washington averaged more yards per rushing attempt, but Dallas ran the ball 44 times compared with Washington’s 16 attempts. Both teams protected the football, so turnovers did not decide the outcome.
Ultimately, Dallas won through early scoring, offensive balance, explosive passing, and exceptional fourth-down execution. Washington demonstrated enough defensive strength and rushing explosiveness to make the game competitive, but its inability to produce a passing touchdown made the comeback more difficult.
The biggest lesson from these numbers is simple: individual statistics explain what players did, but situational statistics often explain why a team won.
