Portland Trail Blazers vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats

The portland trail blazers vs utah jazz match player stats from February 13, 2026, tell a much richer story than the final score alone. Portland defeated Utah 135-119 at Delta Center in Salt Lake City, but the box score shows that this was not simply a case of one team shooting well and the other struggling. Portland combined efficient shooting, strong rebounding, balanced playmaking, and a dominant performance from Jrue Holiday and Donovan Clingan to pull away after halftime.

Portland entered the game at 26-29 overall and improved to 27-29 with the victory, while Utah fell to 18-38. The Trail Blazers also improved their season-series position to 3-0 after this meeting, having already defeated the Jazz 136-134 on October 30 and 137-117 on January 6. The most important difference in this contest came after halftime. Utah actually led 63-61 at the break, but Portland exploded for 40 points in the third quarter and turned the game into a 16-point victory.

This breakdown examines the individual performances, team statistics, shooting efficiency, rebounding battle, playmaking, bench production, and the key reasons Portland controlled the second half.

Portland Trail Blazers vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats at a Glance

Category	Portland Trail Blazers	Utah Jazz
Final Score	135	119
Field Goals	46-90	42-87
Field Goal %	51%	48%
3-Pointers	18-46	14-38
3-Point %	39%	37%
Free Throws	25-33	21-29
Free Throw %	76%	72%
Rebounds	52	38
Assists	26	28
Turnovers	19	19
Steals	7	15
Blocks	7	3
Third-Quarter Points	40	23
Fourth-Quarter Points	34	33

The basic numbers immediately identify the major areas that shaped the result. Portland had a 14-rebound advantage, made four more three-pointers, shot better from the field, and produced seven blocks compared with Utah’s three.

Utah did have advantages in assists and steals, but those strengths were not enough to offset Portland’s shooting and rebounding edge.

Portland Trail Blazers vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats: Portland’s Top Performers

Jrue Holiday Leads Portland With 31 Points

Jrue Holiday was the leading scorer for Portland, finishing with 31 points, 9 rebounds, and 7 assists.

His performance was important because Portland did not rely exclusively on one type of scoring. Holiday provided scoring while also contributing heavily as a rebounder and facilitator.

A 31-point performance becomes even more valuable when it comes alongside seven assists and nine rebounds. It means Holiday was involved in several different areas of the offense rather than simply hunting shots.

His seven assists were tied for the Portland team lead, with Donovan Clingan also recording seven.

Holiday’s combination of scoring and playmaking was particularly useful once Portland began creating separation in the third quarter. The Trail Blazers scored 40 points during that period, and Holiday’s all-around contribution helped maintain offensive pressure.

Donovan Clingan Produces a Monster All-Around Performance

Donovan Clingan delivered arguably the most complete individual stat line of the game.

He recorded:

• 23 points
• 18 rebounds
• 7 assists

The 18 rebounds were the game high.

That rebounding advantage was one of Portland’s biggest strengths. The Trail Blazers finished with 52 total rebounds compared with only 38 for Utah.

Clingan’s seven assists also stand out. A big man producing that level of rebounding while contributing seven assists gives an offense additional ways to create opportunities.

His 23 points made him Portland’s second-leading scorer, but his overall impact went far beyond the scoring column.

Jerami Grant Adds 18 Points

Jerami Grant finished with 18 points, 3 rebounds, and 0 assists.

Grant’s scoring gave Portland another reliable contributor alongside Holiday and Clingan. His 18 points meant Utah had to account for multiple scoring threats instead of concentrating defensive attention on one player.

Toumani Camara Provides Two-Way Production

Toumani Camara posted:

• 14 points
• 8 rebounds
• 3 assists

His eight rebounds were particularly valuable in a game where Portland controlled the glass.

Camara’s production helped Portland build the type of frontcourt advantage that eventually separated the teams.

Sidy Cissoko’s Starting Contribution

Sidy Cissoko finished with 8 points, 4 rebounds, and 1 assist.

His scoring total was lower than Portland’s main offensive contributors, but the overall starting lineup gave the Trail Blazers a strong foundation. Portland’s eventual 135-point total shows that production was spread throughout the roster.

Utah Jazz Match Player Stats: Top Performers

Brice Sensabaugh Leads Utah With 28 Points

Brice Sensabaugh was Utah’s leading scorer with 28 points, 4 rebounds, and 0 assists.

His 28 points were enough to keep Utah competitive offensively, especially during the first half.

However, scoring output from one primary scorer was not enough to overcome Portland’s balanced production. Portland had two players reach at least 23 points, while several other players contributed meaningful scoring.

Sensabaugh’s performance remains one of the clearest positives for Utah from the individual box score.

Kyle Filipowski Posts 15 Points and 9 Rebounds

Kyle Filipowski finished with 15 points, 9 rebounds, and 3 assists.

His nine rebounds were a team high for Utah.

Filipowski therefore played an important role on the glass, but Utah as a team still lost the rebounding battle 52-38.

That 14-rebound difference shows that individual effort was not enough to solve Portland’s collective advantage.

Isaiah Collier Leads Utah in Assists

Isaiah Collier recorded 15 points, 2 rebounds, and 9 assists.

His nine assists were the most by any Utah player.

Collier’s playmaking helped Utah finish with 28 team assists, two more than Portland. This is an important reminder that the Jazz did not lose because they were unable to create offense.

The bigger issue was efficiency and possession control in other areas.

Ace Bailey Adds 15 Points

Ace Bailey finished with 15 points, 8 rebounds, and 3 assists.

His eight rebounds were second among Utah’s starters behind Filipowski’s nine.

Bailey’s contribution helped Utah remain competitive on the boards individually, but Portland’s overall rebounding depth eventually became decisive.

Cody Williams Scores 9 Points

Cody Williams recorded 9 points, 2 rebounds, and 3 assists.

His scoring was more modest than Utah’s leading offensive contributors, but he also contributed as a passer.

Portland’s Bench Makes a Noticeable Contribution

One of the less obvious strengths in the portland trail blazers vs utah jazz match player stats was Portland’s bench scoring.

Shaedon Sharpe led Portland’s reserves with 15 points.

Caleb Love and Vit Krejci each added 11 points.

That gave Portland three important scoring options beyond the primary starters.

Bench production matters in a high-scoring game because starters cannot realistically maintain maximum offensive responsibility for all 48 minutes. Portland’s reserves helped keep pressure on Utah when substitutions were necessary.

Portland Bench Leaders

Player	Points
Shaedon Sharpe	15
Caleb Love	11
Vit Krejci	11

The scoring distribution also explains why Portland reached 135 points without needing one player to score an extraordinary number of points.

Utah’s Bench Production

Utah also received useful contributions from its reserves.

Svi Mykhailiuk scored 14 points, making him Utah’s top bench scorer.

Blake Hinson added 11 points, while John Konchar contributed 6 points.

Utah Bench Leaders

Player	Points
Svi Mykhailiuk	14
Blake Hinson	11
John Konchar	6

Utah’s bench was capable of producing points, but Portland’s overall offensive efficiency and rebounding advantage proved more influential.

The First Half Was Surprisingly Competitive

The final score can make the game appear one-sided from start to finish, but the quarter-by-quarter numbers tell a different story.

First Quarter

Portland scored 28 points.

Utah scored 31.

The Jazz therefore held a three-point advantage after the opening period.

Second Quarter

Portland scored 33 points.

Utah scored 32.

Portland reduced the deficit by one point, but Utah still entered halftime ahead.

Halftime Score

Utah 63, Portland 61

This is one of the most important details for understanding the game.

Portland did not dominate from the opening tip. Utah was actually in front at halftime.

The game changed dramatically after the break.

The Third Quarter Changed Everything

Portland scored 40 points in the third quarter, while Utah managed only 23.

That created a 17-point swing during one quarter.

Portland went from trailing by two points at halftime to leading by 15 points entering the fourth quarter.

This was the decisive stretch of the contest.

A 40-point quarter requires more than one player having a hot shooting spell. It generally reflects sustained offensive execution, successful shot creation, transition opportunities, and enough defensive stops to create extra possessions or prevent the opponent from matching the scoring pace.

Utah’s third-quarter total of 23 points was respectable in isolation, but it was nowhere near enough to keep pace with Portland’s offensive explosion.

Fourth Quarter: Portland Maintains Control

Portland scored another 34 points in the fourth quarter.

Utah responded with 33.

The Jazz therefore slightly outscored Portland in the final period, but by that point the damage had already been done.

Portland’s third-quarter explosion had created too large a cushion.

The final quarter demonstrates an important aspect of game management: once a team builds a major advantage, it does not necessarily need to continue increasing the margin dramatically. It simply needs to prevent the opponent from generating a major comeback.

Portland did exactly that.

Shooting Efficiency Explains Part of Portland’s Advantage

Portland shot 46-of-90 from the field, or approximately 51%.

Utah shot 42-of-87, or approximately 48%.

The three-percentage-point difference may not look enormous, but across a high-volume offensive game, it can produce a meaningful scoring advantage.

Portland also attempted three more field goals than Utah.

That combination of slightly better efficiency and slightly more attempts contributed to the 16-point final margin.

Three-Point Shooting

Portland made 18 of 46 three-point attempts, good for 39%.

Utah made 14 of 38, or 37%.

Portland therefore made four more three-pointers.

Those additional made threes represent 12 extra points from beyond the arc.

In a game decided by 16 points, that is a meaningful part of the scoring gap.

Free Throws

Portland converted 25 of 33 free throws, or 76%.

Utah made 21 of 29, or 72%.

Portland therefore made four more free throws and shot slightly better from the line.

The difference was not huge, but it added another layer to Portland’s offensive advantage.

Rebounding Was One of the Biggest Differences

Portland finished with 52 rebounds.

Utah finished with 38.

That is a 14-rebound advantage for Portland.

This is arguably one of the clearest statistical explanations for the result.

Rebounding can influence a game in several ways:

1. It ends defensive possessions.
2. It creates additional offensive opportunities.
3. It allows a team to control the pace after missed shots.
4. It reduces second-chance opportunities for the opponent.

Donovan Clingan’s 18 rebounds were central to this advantage.

Clingan alone collected nine more rebounds than Utah’s leading rebounder, Kyle Filipowski.

The difference between those two individual performances reflects the broader team trend.

Utah Actually Won the Assist Battle

One of the more interesting elements of the portland trail blazers vs utah jazz match player stats is that Utah finished with more assists.

Utah recorded 28 assists.

Portland recorded 26.

That means the Jazz were not simply playing isolation basketball throughout the game.

Isaiah Collier’s nine assists were especially important.

However, assists do not automatically translate into victory. A team can create more assisted baskets while still losing because of shooting efficiency, rebounding, turnovers, or defensive execution.

That appears to be what happened here.

Turnovers Were Identical

Both teams committed 19 turnovers.

This is another useful comparison because it eliminates one potential explanation for the result.

Portland did not win because Utah was dramatically more careless with the ball.

Both teams had the same number of turnovers.

That shifts greater attention toward shooting, rebounding, and the third-quarter scoring differential.

Utah Had More Steals

Utah recorded 15 steals, compared with Portland’s 7.

That is a substantial defensive advantage in the steals column.

Yet Utah still lost by 16 points.

This illustrates why individual statistical categories must be viewed in context.

Steals can create valuable possessions, but if a team does not consistently convert those advantages into efficient offense, the impact can be reduced.

Utah’s 15 steals were impressive, but Portland’s shooting and rebounding advantages were more influential across the full game.

Portland Had More Blocks

Portland recorded 7 blocks, while Utah had 3.

That six-block difference points toward stronger rim protection from the Trail Blazers.

Combined with the 52-38 rebounding advantage, the blocks suggest Portland was able to exert significant physical control around the basket.

The defensive numbers also help explain how Portland could overcome Utah’s advantage in steals.

A Closer Look at the Team Statistical Profile

The overall statistical comparison provides a useful snapshot.

Statistic	Portland	Utah	Advantage
Points	135	119	Portland
FG%	51%	48%	Portland
3PT%	39%	37%	Portland
FT%	76%	72%	Portland
Rebounds	52	38	Portland
Assists	26	28	Utah
Turnovers	19	19	Even
Steals	7	15	Utah
Blocks	7	3	Portland

The pattern is revealing.

Portland won the categories most closely connected to scoring efficiency and physical possession control.

Utah won assists and steals.

Turnovers were even.

That combination produced a Portland victory despite several defensive playmaking advantages for Utah.

What the Box Score Says About Portland’s Offense

Portland’s offensive profile was balanced.

Holiday led with 31 points.

Clingan followed with 23.

Grant added 18.

Camara scored 14.

Sharpe scored 15 from the bench.

Love and Krejci each contributed 11.

This spread of scoring makes defensive planning difficult.

If one player carries an offense, the opponent can sometimes focus its defensive strategy around limiting that player. Portland had several players capable of contributing significant scoring.

Clingan was especially important because his 23 points came with 18 rebounds and seven assists.

That makes his performance one of the most complete individual stat lines in the game.

What the Box Score Says About Utah’s Offense

Utah’s offensive production was more concentrated.

Sensabaugh led with 28 points.

Filipowski, Collier, and Bailey each scored 15.

Mykhailiuk added 14 from the bench.

The Jazz still reached 119 points, which shows that the offense was productive overall.

The problem was that Portland was even more efficient.

A 119-point performance normally gives a team a strong chance to win a high-scoring game, but Portland’s 135-point output created a 16-point gap.

Why Portland Won the Game

Several factors stand above the rest.

1. Portland’s Third Quarter Was Dominant

The 40-23 third quarter was the defining stretch.

Portland effectively transformed a two-point halftime deficit into a commanding lead in one period.

2. Portland Controlled the Glass

The 52-38 rebounding advantage was enormous.

Clingan’s 18 rebounds were a major component of that difference.

3. Portland Shot More Efficiently

A 51% field-goal percentage compared with Utah’s 48% gave Portland an important efficiency edge.

4. Portland Made More Three-Pointers

Eighteen made threes compared with Utah’s 14 produced a meaningful scoring difference.

5. Portland Had Multiple High-Level Contributors

Holiday’s 31 points and Clingan’s 23 points gave Portland two major scoring performances, while Grant, Camara, Sharpe, Love, and Krejci also provided meaningful production.

Why Utah Lost Despite Some Strong Numbers

The Jazz’s box score includes several positive categories.

They had:

• More assists
• More steals
• The same number of turnovers
• A 28-point performance from Sensabaugh
• Nine assists from Collier

But the weaknesses were more damaging.

Utah was outrebounded by 14.

It shot worse from the field.

It made fewer three-pointers.

It scored 23 points during the decisive third quarter.

The combination made a comeback difficult.

Portland’s Season Series Advantage

After this February 13 game, Portland had won all three meetings against Utah during the season to that point.

The three results were:

Date	Result
October 30, 2025	Portland 136, Utah 134
January 6, 2026	Portland 137, Utah 117
February 13, 2026	Portland 135, Utah 119

The first meeting was especially close, with Portland winning by only two points.

The next two meetings were more comfortable victories.

The provided season-series data also lists a fourth meeting on March 14, with Utah losing 114-124 to Portland. Therefore, the February 13 game should be described as Portland’s third consecutive win in the season series at that point, rather than the final season-series result.

After the March 14 meeting, Portland had completed a 4-0 sweep of the listed season series.

Portland’s Record After the Game

Portland entered the February 13 contest with a 26-29 record and improved to 27-29 after the victory.

The Trail Blazers were also listed at 11-16 on the road.

Utah fell to 18-38, with an 11-18 home record.

The venue was Delta Center in Salt Lake City, where the announced attendance was 18,186.

The game was listed with a 7:00 AM game time in the supplied data.

The Most Important Individual Stat Lines

For readers who want the fastest possible summary of the portland trail blazers vs utah jazz match player stats, these are the individual numbers that deserve the most attention.

Portland

Jrue Holiday: 31 points, 9 rebounds, 7 assists

Donovan Clingan: 23 points, 18 rebounds, 7 assists

Jerami Grant: 18 points, 3 rebounds, 0 assists

Toumani Camara: 14 points, 8 rebounds, 3 assists

Sidy Cissoko: 8 points, 4 rebounds, 1 assist

Shaedon Sharpe: 15 points

Caleb Love: 11 points

Vit Krejci: 11 points

Utah

Brice Sensabaugh: 28 points, 4 rebounds, 0 assists

Kyle Filipowski: 15 points, 9 rebounds, 3 assists

Isaiah Collier: 15 points, 2 rebounds, 9 assists

Ace Bailey: 15 points, 8 rebounds, 3 assists

Cody Williams: 9 points, 2 rebounds, 3 assists

Svi Mykhailiuk: 14 points

Blake Hinson: 11 points

John Konchar: 6 points

Who Was the Best Player in the Game?

Jrue Holiday has the strongest case based on scoring output, finishing with 31 points, nine rebounds, and seven assists.

However, Donovan Clingan’s performance deserves equal attention because of its statistical breadth.

Clingan recorded 23 points and 18 rebounds while also producing seven assists.

If the question is simply who scored the most, Holiday is the answer.

If the question is which player produced the most unusual all-around statistical contribution, Clingan has an extremely strong case.

What Makes Clingan’s Performance Stand Out?

A 23-point, 18-rebound, seven-assist performance is unusual because it combines scoring, interior rebounding, and playmaking at a very high level.

The 18 rebounds were also directly connected to one of Portland’s biggest team advantages.

That makes Clingan’s individual numbers particularly relevant to the overall result rather than being impressive only in isolation.

What Makes Holiday’s Performance Stand Out?

Holiday’s 31 points were the highest individual scoring total in the game.

But he did not stop there.

Nine rebounds and seven assists show that his influence extended into both possession control and playmaking.

His seven assists tied Clingan for the team lead.

That combination gave Portland a veteran-style all-around performance at a critical point in the season.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Portland Trail Blazers and Utah Jazz?

Portland defeated Utah 135-119 on February 13, 2026, at Delta Center in Salt Lake City.

Who was the leading scorer in the game?

Jrue Holiday led all players with 31 points for Portland. Utah’s leading scorer was Brice Sensabaugh with 28 points.

Who had the most rebounds?

Donovan Clingan led everyone with 18 rebounds. Utah’s leading rebounder was Kyle Filipowski with nine.

Who had the most assists?

Isaiah Collier led Utah with 9 assists. Portland’s Jrue Holiday and Donovan Clingan each recorded 7 assists.

Which team shot better?

Portland shot 51% from the field, compared with Utah’s 48%. Portland also shot slightly better from three-point range, 39% to 37%.

How did Portland build its lead?

The decisive moment came in the third quarter. Portland scored 40 points, while Utah scored 23. Portland entered halftime down 63-61 but led by 15 points after the third quarter.

Conclusion

The February 13, 2026 meeting between Portland and Utah was decided by much more than the 135-119 final score. The portland trail blazers vs utah jazz match player stats show a game in which Portland combined strong individual performances with clear team-level advantages.

Jrue Holiday’s 31 points, nine rebounds, and seven assists gave Portland its leading offensive performance. Donovan Clingan was equally important in a different way, producing 23 points, 18 rebounds, and seven assists. His rebounding impact helped Portland win the overall battle on the glass by 14 rebounds.

Utah had several strong individual contributions. Brice Sensabaugh scored 28 points, while Isaiah Collier produced nine assists. The Jazz also finished with more assists and steals than Portland. However, those advantages could not compensate for Portland’s better shooting, superior rebounding, seven blocks, and major third-quarter scoring burst.

The key lesson from the box score is that the game was competitive for two quarters. Utah led 63-61 at halftime. Portland then scored 40 points in the third quarter while limiting Utah to 23, turning a close contest into a comfortable victory.

The result also strengthened Portland’s season-series dominance. After this February meeting, Portland had won all three games against Utah to that point, before the supplied March 14 result completed a 4-0 season sweep.

For anyone studying this matchup through player statistics rather than simply looking at the final score, the clearest conclusions are straightforward: Holiday supplied the scoring leadership, Clingan controlled the glass and added playmaking, Portland shot more efficiently, and the third quarter ultimately determined the outcome.