Golden State Warriors vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats
The golden state warriors vs charlotte hornets match player stats from the March 4, 2025 NBA regular season tell the story of a game where Golden State combined balanced scoring, disciplined ball movement, and strong defensive execution to secure a convincing 119 to 101 victory over Charlotte at Spectrum Center. While the Warriors controlled the game with contributions from several players, the Hornets relied heavily on outstanding individual performances from Miles Bridges and LaMelo Ball. Looking beyond the final score reveals how efficiency, teamwork, and smart decision making shaped the outcome. This detailed breakdown examines every important statistic, highlights standout performances, and explains what those numbers mean in the broader context of the season.
Match Overview
| Match Details | Information |
| Competition | NBA Regular Season |
| Date | March 4, 2025 |
| Venue | Spectrum Center |
| City | Charlotte, North Carolina |
| Attendance | 19,223 |
| Final Score | Golden State Warriors 119, Charlotte Hornets 101 |
| Winning Team | Golden State Warriors |
| Season Series | Warriors won 2 to 0 |
| Previous Meeting | Warriors 128, Hornets 92 on February 26, 2025 |
Golden State entered the contest with a 33 and 28 record while Charlotte arrived at 14 and 46. Although the Warriors were playing away from home, they displayed confidence from the opening tip and never allowed the Hornets to establish consistent momentum.
Golden State Warriors vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats Breakdown
The golden state warriors vs charlotte hornets match player stats reveal a clear difference in execution rather than talent alone. Golden State moved the basketball exceptionally well, protected possessions, and converted key opportunities from beyond the arc.
Team Statistics Comparison
| Team Statistics | Warriors | Hornets |
| Points | 119 | 101 |
| Field Goals | 40 of 95 (42%) | 34 of 86 (40%) |
| Three Pointers | 18 of 50 (36%) | 11 of 40 (28%) |
| Free Throws | 21 of 24 (88%) | 22 of 33 (67%) |
| Rebounds | 54 | 47 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 12 | 8 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 42 | 39 |
| Assists | 33 | 20 |
| Turnovers | 8 | 17 |
| Steals | 10 | 3 |
| Blocks | 4 | 6 |
| Personal Fouls | 23 | 19 |
Several numbers immediately stand out.
Golden State finished with thirteen more assists than Charlotte, reflecting excellent offensive chemistry. Even more impressive was the turnover margin. The Warriors committed only eight turnovers while forcing seventeen from the Hornets. That difference created numerous extra scoring opportunities and prevented Charlotte from building sustained offensive runs.
Quarter by Quarter Analysis
First Quarter
The Warriors opened aggressively, taking a 28 to 21 advantage. Their offense featured quick ball movement and patient shot selection, while Charlotte struggled to generate consistent scoring outside of its primary creators.
Second Quarter
Golden State maintained control by winning the period 30 to 28. Charlotte improved offensively, but the Warriors continued finding open shooters and attacking defensive mismatches.
Third Quarter
Both teams scored 28 points, making this the most evenly contested quarter. Charlotte attempted to reduce the deficit through Miles Bridges’ aggressive scoring, but Golden State answered nearly every run.
Fourth Quarter
The Warriors closed the game with authority, outscoring Charlotte 33 to 24. Their experience became evident during the final minutes as they executed efficiently on both ends of the floor and eliminated any possibility of a comeback.
Warriors Player Performance Analysis
Golden State did not rely on one superstar performance. Instead, several players contributed in meaningful ways.
Buddy Hield Leads the Scoring
Buddy Hield finished as Golden State’s leading scorer with 22 points.
His performance showcased why elite perimeter shooting remains so valuable. Hield consistently stretched Charlotte’s defense, creating additional driving lanes for teammates while converting important perimeter shots that helped maintain the Warriors’ lead.
Key Contributions
- Team high 22 points
- Efficient perimeter shooting
- Excellent floor spacing
- Strong off ball movement
Stephen Curry Controls the Game
Stephen Curry recorded
- 21 points
- 10 assists
Although Curry did not lead the team in scoring, his overall influence was unmistakable.
His court vision consistently created open looks for teammates, while his shooting gravity forced Charlotte’s defenders to remain focused on him even without the ball. Those subtle contributions often fail to appear in traditional statistics but significantly improve an offense.
Curry’s double double reflected his willingness to facilitate rather than dominate every possession as a scorer.
Brandin Podziemski Continues to Impress
Brandin Podziemski contributed 19 points and provided consistent energy throughout the contest.
His ability to make smart decisions, attack closeouts, and defend multiple positions has become increasingly valuable within Golden State’s system.
Draymond Green Delivers Another Complete Performance
Draymond Green produced one of the most balanced stat lines of the evening.
His numbers included
- 16 points
- 12 rebounds
Green anchored the defense while controlling the glass. His communication, screening, rebounding, and leadership helped organize nearly every defensive possession.
Although defensive impact cannot always be measured through box score statistics, Green’s influence remained obvious throughout all four quarters.
Jimmy Butler III Adds Balanced Production
Jimmy Butler III finished with 13 points while contributing on both ends of the floor.
Rather than forcing difficult shots, Butler played within the offense, defended aggressively, and supported Golden State’s balanced attack.
His experience proved especially valuable during crucial stretches when Charlotte attempted to reduce the deficit.
Warriors Bench Impact
One reason Golden State maintained control throughout the game was its productive bench.
Available contributors included
- Kevon Looney
- Buddy Hield
- Gary Payton II
- Trayce Jackson Davis
- Kevin Knox II
- Gui Santos
- Pat Spencer
- Quinten Post
The second unit sustained defensive intensity and ensured that the team’s offensive rhythm remained consistent whenever the starters rested.
Unlike many teams that experience scoring droughts during substitutions, Golden State maintained offensive balance throughout the contest.
Charlotte Hornets Player Performance Analysis
Although Charlotte suffered another defeat, several players delivered impressive individual performances. The biggest challenge for the Hornets was the lack of consistent production beyond their primary stars. While two players carried much of the offensive load, the supporting cast struggled to match Golden State’s depth and efficiency.
Miles Bridges Produced an Outstanding Scoring Night
Miles Bridges was the Hornets’ best performer, finishing with 35 points, the highest total by either team.
His scoring came from a variety of situations, including transition opportunities, drives to the basket, and perimeter shooting. Bridges consistently attacked the Warriors’ defense and kept Charlotte competitive during several stretches of the game.
Key highlights of his performance include:
- Game high 35 points
- Aggressive offensive approach
- Efficient scoring throughout all four quarters
- Strong leadership despite the loss
Even with Bridges playing at an elite level offensively, Charlotte needed more consistent contributions from the rest of the roster to challenge an experienced Warriors team.
LaMelo Ball Controlled the Offense
LaMelo Ball once again demonstrated why he remains the engine of Charlotte’s offense.
His final numbers included:
- 25 points
- 7 assists
Ball created scoring opportunities both for himself and his teammates. His passing vision generated several quality looks, but Golden State’s defensive pressure limited Charlotte’s overall ball movement.
The Warriors frequently trapped Ball near the perimeter and forced the basketball out of his hands, reducing the effectiveness of Charlotte’s offensive system.
Mark Williams Controlled the Glass
Mark Williams provided an important interior presence with 13 rebounds, leading the Hornets on the boards.
His rebounding prevented Golden State from collecting even more second chance opportunities. Williams also protected the rim effectively, although the Warriors’ spacing often pulled Charlotte’s big men away from the basket.
Supporting Cast Performance
Charlotte’s remaining starters included:
- Josh Green
- Nick Smith Jr.
The bench featured:
- Moussa Diabate
- Tidjane Salaun
- Jusuf Nurkic
- Malachi Flynn
- Seth Curry
- DaQuan Jeffries
- Damion Baugh
- Wendell Moore Jr.
While there were positive individual moments, the supporting players were unable to consistently relieve the scoring pressure on Bridges and Ball. Against an experienced team like Golden State, balanced production is essential, and Charlotte simply did not receive enough contributions across the rotation.
Statistical Comparison of the Star Players
The biggest names from both teams produced quality performances, but their impact came in different ways.
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Buddy Hield | 22 | ||
| Stephen Curry | 21 | 10 | |
| Brandin Podziemski | 19 | ||
| Draymond Green | 16 | 12 | |
| Jimmy Butler III | 13 | ||
| Miles Bridges | 35 | ||
| LaMelo Ball | 25 | 7 | |
| Mark Williams | 13 |
One interesting takeaway is that Charlotte had the game’s leading scorer, yet Golden State won comfortably. This illustrates an important basketball principle: team efficiency often outweighs individual scoring excellence.
Why Golden State Won the Game
Looking deeper into the numbers, several factors explain the Warriors’ victory.
Superior Ball Movement
Golden State recorded 33 assists, compared to Charlotte’s 20.
This difference reflects an offense built around quick decisions, player movement, and unselfish passing. Rather than relying on isolation plays, the Warriors consistently created open shots through teamwork.
Protecting the Basketball
Turnovers played a decisive role.
- Warriors turnovers: 8
- Hornets turnovers: 17
Nine extra possessions may not seem significant at first glance, but over the course of an NBA game they can easily account for double digit scoring differences.
Golden State consistently capitalized on Charlotte’s mistakes while minimizing its own.
Better Three Point Shooting
Modern NBA games are often decided from beyond the arc.
Golden State made:
- 18 three pointers
Charlotte made:
- 11 three pointers
That seven shot difference from long range represented a major scoring advantage.
Free Throw Efficiency
The Warriors converted 88 percent of their free throws.
Charlotte managed only 67 percent.
Missed free throws prevented the Hornets from closing the gap during several important stretches.
Rebounding Advantage
Golden State also controlled the boards.
- Warriors rebounds: 54
- Hornets rebounds: 47
Winning the rebounding battle limited Charlotte’s second chance opportunities while creating additional possessions for the visitors.
Tactical Breakdown
Warriors Offensive Strategy
Golden State emphasized:
- Ball movement
- Floor spacing
- Transition offense
- Perimeter shooting
- Smart shot selection
Rather than depending on one player, nearly every possession involved multiple passes before an open look was created.
This offensive style remains one of the defining characteristics of the Warriors during the Stephen Curry era.
Warriors Defensive Strategy
Defensively, Golden State focused on disrupting Charlotte’s playmakers.
Key defensive objectives included:
- Limiting easy transition baskets
- Forcing turnovers
- Contesting perimeter shots
- Protecting the defensive glass
Although Bridges and Ball scored effectively, the Warriors successfully prevented Charlotte’s supporting players from making a major impact.
Hornets Offensive Approach
Charlotte relied heavily on individual shot creation.
Bridges attacked aggressively from the wing while Ball orchestrated the offense. However, the team’s overall passing numbers suggest that offensive possessions frequently ended with difficult individual attempts rather than high quality team execution.
Against disciplined defensive teams, this approach becomes increasingly difficult to sustain.
What This Game Means for Golden State
This victory improved the Warriors’ record to 33 and 28 while strengthening their momentum during an important stage of the regular season.
Several encouraging signs emerged:
- Balanced scoring throughout the lineup
- Strong chemistry between starters
- Efficient offensive execution
- Excellent decision making
- Consistent defensive communication
Perhaps most importantly, Golden State demonstrated that it could win without relying exclusively on Stephen Curry’s scoring.
Having multiple players capable of contributing offensively makes the Warriors a much more difficult team to defend as the postseason approaches.
In addition, players such as Brandin Podziemski and Buddy Hield continued to provide valuable secondary scoring, reducing pressure on the team’s veteran stars.
What This Game Means for Charlotte
Although the Hornets fell to 14 and 46 after this loss, the game still provided several positives that the coaching staff can build upon.
The biggest encouragement was the offensive production from Miles Bridges and LaMelo Ball. Together, they scored 60 of Charlotte’s 101 points, showing they can compete against experienced opponents when given opportunities.
At the same time, the statistics exposed several areas requiring improvement before Charlotte can consistently challenge playoff-caliber teams.
Turnovers Remain a Major Issue
Charlotte committed 17 turnovers, more than double Golden State’s total.
Every unnecessary turnover disrupted offensive rhythm while creating transition opportunities for the Warriors. Against disciplined teams, protecting the basketball becomes even more important because every possession has added value.
Improving decision making under defensive pressure should remain one of the team’s highest priorities.
Three Point Efficiency Must Improve
The Hornets attempted 40 shots from beyond the arc but converted only 11.
A 28 percent success rate makes it difficult to keep pace with teams that shoot efficiently from long distance. Several attempts were well contested, while others simply failed to fall despite good offensive execution.
Finding more consistent perimeter shooting will make Charlotte’s offense significantly more balanced in future games.
Greater Bench Production Is Needed
Golden State received meaningful contributions throughout its rotation, while Charlotte depended heavily on its starting lineup.
Developing bench players and increasing scoring consistency outside the starting five will become increasingly important as the team continues its rebuilding process.
Complete Team Comparison
The following comparison summarizes how each team performed across the game’s major statistical categories.
| Category | Golden State Warriors | Charlotte Hornets | Advantage |
| Points | 119 | 101 | Warriors |
| Field Goal Percentage | 42% | 40% | Warriors |
| Three Point Percentage | 36% | 28% | Warriors |
| Free Throw Percentage | 88% | 67% | Warriors |
| Total Rebounds | 54 | 47 | Warriors |
| Assists | 33 | 20 | Warriors |
| Turnovers | 8 | 17 | Warriors |
| Steals | 10 | 3 | Warriors |
| Offensive Rebounds | 12 | 8 | Warriors |
Nearly every major category favored Golden State.
This explains why the final margin reached 18 points despite Charlotte receiving exceptional individual scoring performances from Bridges and Ball.
Key Takeaways from the Match
Several lessons emerge after reviewing the complete statistical picture.
1. Team Basketball Defeated Individual Brilliance
Miles Bridges finished with the highest scoring total of the game, but basketball is ultimately decided by collective execution.
Golden State demonstrated outstanding teamwork through passing, spacing, defensive communication, and balanced scoring.
2. Ball Movement Continues to Define Golden State
Recording 33 assists reflects an offense that consistently creates quality scoring opportunities.
Rather than forcing contested shots, the Warriors trusted their offensive system, resulting in efficient possessions throughout the night.
3. Defense Created Offense
The Warriors forced 17 turnovers, many of which immediately turned into transition opportunities.
Generating easy points without needing to attack a set defense remains one of the most effective ways to win NBA games.
4. Experience Made the Difference
Veteran leadership from Stephen Curry, Draymond Green, Jimmy Butler III, and Buddy Hield helped Golden State remain composed whenever Charlotte attempted to build momentum.
The Warriors rarely rushed possessions or allowed mistakes to snowball into larger problems.
5. Charlotte’s Young Core Still Shows Promise
Despite another loss, performances from Bridges, Ball, and Williams highlighted the potential foundation of Charlotte’s future.
If the supporting cast develops and overall efficiency improves, the Hornets could become a far more competitive team over the coming seasons.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Golden State Warriors vs Charlotte Hornets game on March 4, 2025?
The Golden State Warriors defeated the Charlotte Hornets 119 to 101 at Spectrum Center in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Who scored the most points in the game?
Miles Bridges led all scorers with 35 points for the Charlotte Hornets.
Who was the Warriors’ leading scorer?
Buddy Hield led Golden State with 22 points, while Stephen Curry added 21 points and 10 assists.
How many assists did Stephen Curry record?
Stephen Curry finished the game with 10 assists, recording a double double while helping orchestrate the Warriors’ offense.
Which team won the season series?
Golden State swept the season series 2 to 0, including victories by scores of 128 to 92 and 119 to 101.
What statistic had the biggest impact on the result?
The turnover difference played a major role. Golden State committed only 8 turnovers while forcing Charlotte into 17, creating extra possessions and easier scoring opportunities.
Conclusion
The golden state warriors vs charlotte hornets match player stats provide much more than a record of individual performances. They illustrate how disciplined execution, balanced scoring, and efficient teamwork can overcome even outstanding individual efforts from the opposing side. Golden State controlled the contest through excellent ball movement, careful possession management, accurate free throw shooting, and a clear advantage in rebounding and assists.
Charlotte showed encouraging signs through the performances of Miles Bridges, LaMelo Ball, and Mark Williams, but the overall numbers highlight the importance of improving shooting efficiency, reducing turnovers, and developing greater offensive support throughout the roster. For Golden State, this victory reinforced the value of its experienced core and demonstrated the effectiveness of an offense built on sharing the basketball rather than relying on one dominant scorer.
As a complete statistical case study, this matchup serves as an excellent example of how modern NBA games are often decided by efficiency, teamwork, and execution across all four quarters rather than by scoring alone.
