Milwaukee Bucks vs Pacers Match Player Stats

The milwaukee bucks vs pacers match player stats from the March 16, 2026 game provide a detailed picture of how Milwaukee defeated Indiana 134-123 at Fiserv Forum. The Bucks overcame a three-point halftime deficit by producing a powerful second half, with Giannis Antetokounmpo leading the way with 31 points, 14 rebounds, and 8 assists. Bobby Portis added 29 points and 10 rebounds, while Ryan Rollins contributed 20 points, 7 assists, and 3 steals. For Indiana, Aaron Nesmith was the leading scorer with 32 points, while T.J. McConnell recorded 11 assists and Jarace Walker finished with 8 rebounds.

The final score does not fully explain how the game developed. Indiana actually led 65-62 at halftime after scoring 34 points in the first quarter and 31 in the second. Milwaukee then changed the momentum by scoring 40 points in the third quarter and another 32 in the fourth. The Bucks finished the game shooting 54% from the field and 52% from three-point range, while also committing only 9 turnovers compared with Indiana’s 18.

This combination of efficient shooting, better ball security, offensive rebounding, and second-half execution ultimately separated the teams.

Milwaukee Bucks vs Pacers Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The game was played at Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with an attendance of 15,898.

Milwaukee entered the matchup with a 28-39 record and a 16-18 home record. Indiana came into the game at 15-53 overall and 5-29 on the road.

The Bucks completed a 4-0 season-series sweep over the Pacers according to the supplied game data.

Final Score

Team	1st Quarter	2nd Quarter	3rd Quarter	4th Quarter	Final
Indiana Pacers	34	31	31	27	123
Milwaukee Bucks	26	36	40	32	134

The first half was closely contested. Indiana established an eight-point lead after the opening quarter, but Milwaukee responded in the second period and reduced the deficit to three points.

The third quarter became the decisive stretch.

Milwaukee scored 40 points while holding Indiana to 31. The Bucks then maintained their advantage in the fourth quarter, outscoring the Pacers 32-27.

That 72-point second half was the foundation of the victory.

Team Statistical Comparison

The team statistics reveal several reasons Milwaukee was able to win despite Indiana’s strong shooting.

Category	Indiana Pacers	Milwaukee Bucks
Points	123	134
Field Goals	42-81	49-90
Field Goal Percentage	52%	54%
Three-Pointers	21-42	23-44
Three-Point Percentage	50%	52%
Free Throws	18-23	13-19
Free Throw Percentage	78%	68%
Rebounds	40	40
Offensive Rebounds	10	13
Defensive Rebounds	30	27
Assists	34	31
Turnovers	18	9
Steals	5	10
Blocks	6	2
Personal Fouls	15	17

One of the most important numbers is the turnover difference.

Indiana gave the ball away 18 times, while Milwaukee committed only 9 turnovers. That gave the Bucks nine additional possessions and created more opportunities to capitalize on their efficient offense.

The Bucks also recorded 10 steals compared with 5 for Indiana.

At the same time, both teams finished with exactly 40 total rebounds, showing that the overall rebounding battle was balanced.

However, Milwaukee collected 13 offensive rebounds compared with Indiana’s 10. Those additional second-chance opportunities helped the Bucks generate more scoring possessions.

Giannis Antetokounmpo Leads Milwaukee

Giannis Antetokounmpo was Milwaukee’s leading scorer and most complete performer.

His final line was:

Statistic	Giannis Antetokounmpo
Minutes	23
Points	31
Field Goals	11-22
Three-Pointers	0-0
Free Throws	9-13
Rebounds	14
Assists	8
Turnovers	1
Steals	0
Blocks	0
Offensive Rebounds	6
Defensive Rebounds	8
Plus/Minus	+17

The most striking part of his performance was how much he contributed outside scoring.

Giannis collected 14 rebounds and produced 8 assists while turning the ball over only once.

His six offensive rebounds were particularly valuable because they created additional opportunities for Milwaukee.

His plus/minus of +17 was also the best among the Bucks starters.

Giannis’ Scoring Efficiency

Giannis made 11 of 22 field-goal attempts, giving him a 50% field-goal rate.

He also converted 9 of 13 free throws.

His scoring came without relying on three-point shooting. He attempted no three-pointers, meaning Milwaukee received his offensive production primarily through inside scoring, transition opportunities, and free throws.

This created a different type of offensive pressure compared with Indiana’s perimeter-heavy scoring.

Giannis’ All-Around Impact

A 31-point performance is impressive on its own, but the combination of 31 points, 14 rebounds, and 8 assists made this a complete performance.

He directly contributed as a scorer, rebounder, and playmaker.

His 1 turnover also stands out because he carried a significant portion of Milwaukee’s offensive responsibility.

The supplied game data also shows that Giannis left the game after an awkward landing late in the third quarter. He had already produced his major statistical contribution by that point, and Milwaukee’s supporting cast was able to maintain the advantage.

Bobby Portis Delivers 29 Points

Bobby Portis was Milwaukee’s second-highest scorer with 29 points.

His performance included:

• 29 points
• 11-of-21 field goals
• 6-of-11 three-pointers
• 1-of-2 free throws
• 10 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 2 steals
• 4 offensive rebounds
• 1 turnover

Portis was particularly effective from long range.

He made six three-pointers, giving Milwaukee a major secondary scoring source.

His 10 rebounds also meant he produced a double-double.

The combination of shooting and rebounding made Portis one of the most important supporting players in the game.

Ryan Rollins Controls the Backcourt

Ryan Rollins delivered another major performance for Milwaukee.

He finished with 20 points, 7 assists, and 3 steals.

Statistic	Ryan Rollins
Minutes	37
Points	20
Field Goals	8-12
Three-Pointers	3-5
Free Throws	1-2
Rebounds	2
Assists	7
Turnovers	3
Steals	3
Plus/Minus	+14

Rollins shot 8-of-12 from the field, which represents 66.7% shooting.

His 3-of-5 performance from three-point range also gave Milwaukee reliable perimeter scoring.

The 7 assists were nearly as important as his points because they helped maintain offensive movement.

His 3 steals added another dimension to his performance.

Kyle Kuzma Provides Playmaking

Kyle Kuzma scored only 8 points, but his contribution was much broader than his scoring total.

He recorded:

• 8 points
• 3 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 2 steals
• 1 block
• 1 turnover

His 8 assists tied Giannis for the team lead.

This is an important reminder when evaluating player statistics. Scoring is only one part of offensive value.

Kuzma helped Milwaukee generate opportunities for teammates, and his 2 steals also contributed to the team’s defensive pressure.

Myles Turner Adds Two-Way Production

Myles Turner scored 13 points in 30 minutes.

He shot 4-of-7 from the field and 3-of-6 from three-point range.

He also recorded:

• 4 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 1 turnover
• 1 steal
• 1 block
• +6 plus/minus

His ability to contribute from outside while also providing rim protection gave Milwaukee useful balance.

AJ Green Shoots Efficiently

AJ Green scored 12 points while making 4 of 7 field goals.

Most importantly, he made 4 of 7 three-point attempts.

His three-point accuracy allowed Milwaukee to stretch the floor and create additional space for players attacking the basket.

He finished with a +8 plus/minus.

Taurean Prince Makes a Strong Bench Contribution

Taurean Prince scored 13 points in 22 minutes.

He made 5 of 7 field goals and 3 of 5 three-pointers.

He also contributed 2 rebounds, 2 assists, and 1 steal.

His +13 plus/minus was one of Milwaukee’s strongest marks.

Prince was another example of the Bucks receiving efficient production beyond their primary star.

Aaron Nesmith Leads Indiana With 32 Points

Aaron Nesmith was Indiana’s leading scorer and finished with the highest individual scoring total in the game.

His numbers were:

Statistic	Aaron Nesmith
Minutes	29
Points	32
Field Goals	10-14
Three-Pointers	7-10
Free Throws	5-5
Rebounds	2
Assists	1
Turnovers	3
Steals	0
Blocks	1
Plus/Minus	-7

Nesmith shot 10-of-14 from the field, which equals 71.4%.

His three-point shooting was even more impressive. He made 7 of 10 attempts from outside.

He also made all five of his free throws.

This was an excellent individual scoring performance.

The challenge for Indiana was that Nesmith did not receive enough consistent production around him during Milwaukee’s second-half surge.

T.J. McConnell Leads the Pacers in Assists

T.J. McConnell finished with 11 assists, the highest assist total of the game.

His complete line included:

• 9 points
• 3-of-10 field goals
• 3-of-3 free throws
• 2 rebounds
• 11 assists
• 2 turnovers
• 1 steal
• -8 plus/minus

McConnell’s 11 assists demonstrate how effectively he helped create opportunities for teammates.

Indiana finished with 34 team assists, three more than Milwaukee.

However, the Pacers’ passing advantage was not enough to overcome their turnover disadvantage.

Jarace Walker Delivers a Versatile Performance

Jarace Walker recorded one of Indiana’s most balanced statistical performances.

He finished with:

• 14 points
• 8 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 6-of-12 field goals
• 2-of-6 three-pointers
• 0-of-2 free throws
• 3 offensive rebounds
• 1 block
• 0 turnovers

The zero turnovers are especially notable.

Walker handled significant offensive responsibilities without giving away a possession.

His 8 rebounds led Indiana, while his 6 assists ranked second on the team.

However, his plus/minus was -17, the lowest among the Pacers’ starters.

That contrast demonstrates why plus/minus should be viewed alongside the rest of the box score rather than used by itself.

Ivica Zubac Contributes Inside

Ivica Zubac scored 10 points in 24 minutes.

He made 4 of 10 field-goal attempts and both of his free throws.

He also recorded:

• 7 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 1 turnover
• 3 offensive rebounds
• +1 plus/minus

His three offensive rebounds helped Indiana create additional possessions.

Jay Huff Provides Bench Scoring

Jay Huff scored 16 points in 20 minutes.

He shot 5-of-8 from the field and 3-of-6 from three-point range.

He also made all three of his free throws.

His 2 blocks were another useful contribution.

Huff was one of Indiana’s most efficient offensive players, although his plus/minus was -15.

Again, that number should not be interpreted as a complete individual evaluation. Plus/minus reflects the team’s scoring margin while the player is on the court.

Obi Toppin Adds Three-Point Production

Obi Toppin scored 11 points in 16 minutes.

He made 3 of 7 field goals and 3 of 7 three-point attempts.

He also recorded:

• 4 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 2-of-3 free throws
• +2 plus/minus

His three made three-pointers helped Indiana maintain its strong overall perimeter shooting.

Kobe Brown Provides an Efficient All-Around Line

Kobe Brown scored 9 points but contributed in several other areas.

He finished with:

• 9 points
• 3-of-4 field goals
• 2-of-3 three-pointers
• 6 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 2 turnovers
• 3 offensive rebounds

His 5 assists and 6 rebounds demonstrate his versatility.

He also shot 75% from the field.

Complete Indiana Pacers Player Stats

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	TO	STL	BLK	+/-
Aaron Nesmith	29	32	10-14	7-10	5-5	2	1	3	0	1	-7
Jay Huff	20	16	5-8	3-6	3-3	1	0	1	0	2	-15
Jarace Walker	30	14	6-12	2-6	0-2	8	6	0	0	1	-17
Obi Toppin	16	11	3-7	3-7	2-3	4	3	2	0	0	+2
Ivica Zubac	24	10	4-10	0-0	2-2	7	2	1	0	0	+1
T.J. McConnell	28	9	3-10	0-1	3-3	2	11	2	1	0	-8
Kobe Brown	25	9	3-4	2-3	1-2	6	5	2	0	0	-11
Taelon Peter	13	9	3-4	1-2	2-3	0	0	1	0	0	-2
Quenton Jackson	15	5	2-5	1-3	0-0	3	2	3	0	0	+1
Jalen Slawson	27	3	1-4	1-3	0-0	4	0	2	2	2	-4
Micah Potter	5	3	1-1	1-1	0-0	1	1	0	1	0	+3
Kam Jones	10	2	1-2	0-0	0-0	2	3	1	1	0	+2

Complete Milwaukee Bucks Player Stats

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	TO	STL	BLK	+/-
Giannis Antetokounmpo	23	31	11-22	0-0	9-13	14	8	1	0	0	+17
Bobby Portis	27	29	11-21	6-11	1-2	10	3	1	2	0	-4
Ryan Rollins	37	20	8-12	3-5	1-2	2	7	3	3	0	+14
Taurean Prince	22	13	5-7	3-5	0-0	2	2	1	1	0	+13
Myles Turner	30	13	4-7	3-6	2-2	4	0	1	1	1	+6
AJ Green	24	12	4-7	4-7	0-0	2	1	1	0	0	+8
Kyle Kuzma	36	8	3-7	2-6	0-0	3	8	1	2	1	-1
Gary Harris	22	6	2-4	2-4	0-0	0	1	0	1	0	-2
Jericho Sims	14	2	1-3	0-0	0-0	3	1	0	0	0	+1
Thanasis Antetokounmpo	1	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	+1
Pete Nance	3	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	+1
Andre Jackson Jr.	1	0	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0	+1

Gary Trent Jr. and Cam Thomas were listed as DNP due to the coach’s decision.

The Turnover Battle Decided the Game

The most important statistical difference was Milwaukee’s ball security.

Indiana committed 18 turnovers.

Milwaukee committed only 9.

That is a nine-turnover advantage for the Bucks.

The difference becomes even more meaningful when considering that both teams were shooting efficiently.

Indiana made 52% of its field-goal attempts.

Milwaukee made 54%.

When shooting efficiency is close, wasted possessions become more costly.

Milwaukee gave itself more chances to use its efficient offense.

Indiana, despite shooting extremely well, repeatedly lost possessions before getting a shot.

This is one of the clearest explanations for the final result.

Offensive Rebounding Gave Milwaukee Extra Chances

The total rebounding numbers were identical at 40 each.

However, the distribution was different.

Milwaukee recorded 13 offensive rebounds.

Indiana recorded 10.

The Bucks therefore gained three additional offensive possessions through offensive rebounding.

Giannis accounted for 6 offensive rebounds.

Bobby Portis added 4.

Together, those two players generated 10 of Milwaukee’s 13 offensive rebounds.

That is a significant contribution because second-chance possessions can punish defenses even after they initially defend a shot successfully.

Both Teams Shot Extremely Well From Three

The three-point numbers were impressive on both sides.

Indiana:

• 21-of-42
• 50%

Milwaukee:

• 23-of-44
• 52%

Milwaukee made only two more three-pointers, but those two additional makes were worth six points.

The more important story was that neither team could rely on poor opponent shooting to create an advantage.

The Bucks needed to win in other areas.

They did so through turnover control, steals, offensive rebounds, transition scoring, and a dominant second half.

Indiana Won the Assist Battle

Indiana finished with 34 assists.

Milwaukee finished with 31.

This is an important part of the statistical story because the losing team actually recorded more assists.

T.J. McConnell led the game with 11.

Jarace Walker added 6.

Kobe Brown added 5.

The Pacers clearly moved the ball effectively.

However, assists do not automatically translate into victory.

Indiana’s 18 turnovers reduced the value of its otherwise strong ball movement.

Milwaukee Created More Defensive Pressure

The Bucks finished with 10 steals.

The Pacers recorded 5.

That two-to-one difference indicates that Milwaukee was more effective at turning defensive activity into possession changes.

The Bucks also had more fast-break scoring according to the supplied game data.

This became particularly important during the second half, when Milwaukee began playing with greater pace and pressure.

The Third Quarter Was the Turning Point

At halftime, Indiana led 65-62.

The game was still very much within reach for either team.

Then Milwaukee scored 40 points in the third quarter.

That was the biggest scoring quarter by either team.

Indiana still scored 31, but the nine-point difference shifted the game toward Milwaukee.

The Bucks entered the fourth quarter with a six-point advantage according to the supplied game data.

They then scored 32 points in the final period while Indiana scored 27.

Instead of allowing Indiana to regain control, Milwaukee continued to build its advantage.

Why Indiana’s Strong Shooting Was Not Enough

Indiana’s shooting numbers look strong at first glance.

The Pacers shot:

• 52% from the field
• 50% from three
• 78% from the free-throw line

Those numbers would normally give a team a strong chance to win.

But the Pacers lost the possession battle.

They committed nine more turnovers than Milwaukee and collected three fewer offensive rebounds.

Milwaukee also recorded five more steals.

This meant that Indiana’s shooting efficiency was applied to fewer usable possessions.

That is an important lesson when analyzing game statistics. Efficiency matters, but possession volume matters too.

Why Milwaukee’s Supporting Cast Mattered

Giannis produced 31 points, but Milwaukee did not depend entirely on him.

Bobby Portis scored 29.

Ryan Rollins scored 20.

Taurean Prince and Myles Turner each scored 13.

AJ Green scored 12.

That gave Milwaukee six players in double figures.

Indiana also had multiple contributors, but Nesmith’s 32 points represented a larger share of the Pacers’ offensive production.

Milwaukee’s balanced scoring made it harder for Indiana to concentrate its defensive attention on one player.

The Importance of Bobby Portis’ Performance

Portis deserves special attention because his production helped stabilize Milwaukee’s offense.

His 29 points were only two fewer than Giannis’ total.

He also grabbed 10 rebounds.

Most importantly, he made six three-pointers.

This meant Indiana could not simply focus on defending Giannis inside.

If defenders collapsed toward the paint, Portis could punish them from outside.

If they stayed home on shooters, Giannis could attack inside.

That type of offensive balance is difficult for a defense to manage.

The Importance of Ryan Rollins’ Performance

Rollins also played an important role in keeping Milwaukee’s offense organized.

He scored 20 points on 8-of-12 shooting.

He added 7 assists and 3 steals.

His +14 plus/minus indicates that Milwaukee generally performed well during his minutes.

His performance was particularly useful because it reduced the pressure on Giannis to create every offensive possession.

What Indiana Did Well

The Pacers should not be viewed as having played poorly in every area.

Several parts of their performance were strong.

• They shot 52% from the field.
• They made half of their three-point attempts.
• They recorded 34 assists.

Aaron Nesmith scored 32 points on outstanding efficiency.

T.J. McConnell created 11 assists.

Jarace Walker recorded 14 points, 8 rebounds, and 6 assists without committing a turnover.

Jay Huff scored 16 points in only 20 minutes.

Those are meaningful positives.

The main issue was that Indiana could not maintain control of the game when Milwaukee increased pressure in the second half.

What Milwaukee Did Best

Milwaukee’s biggest strengths were consistency and possession management.

The Bucks:

• Shot 54% from the field
• Made 23 three-pointers
• Committed only 9 turnovers
• Collected 13 offensive rebounds
• Recorded 10 steals
• Scored 134 points
• Produced 72 points in the second half
• Received major contributions from several players

The combination made the Bucks difficult to stop.

Even when Giannis was no longer available late in the game, Milwaukee had enough offensive production to maintain its lead.

Key Player Matchup: Giannis vs Nesmith

One of the most interesting individual comparisons was between Giannis Antetokounmpo and Aaron Nesmith.

Nesmith scored 32 points.

Giannis scored 31.

Nesmith was more efficient as a perimeter scorer, making 7 of 10 three-point attempts.

Giannis had the broader statistical contribution with 14 rebounds and 8 assists.

This shows the difference between a scoring performance and an all-around performance.

Nesmith gave Indiana elite shooting.

Giannis gave Milwaukee scoring, rebounding, playmaking, and interior pressure.

Key Player Matchup: Portis vs Indiana’s Frontcourt

Bobby Portis’ 29 points and 10 rebounds were another major factor.

He shot 11-of-21 overall and 6-of-11 from three.

Indiana had several players capable of contributing around the basket, but Portis’ combination of size and perimeter shooting created a difficult defensive problem.

His four offensive rebounds also created additional pressure.

Key Player Matchup: Rollins vs McConnell

Ryan Rollins and T.J. McConnell provided different types of backcourt production.

McConnell led the game with 11 assists.

Rollins scored 20 points, recorded 7 assists, and added 3 steals.

McConnell was the more traditional facilitator.

Rollins provided a stronger combination of scoring and defensive disruption.

Both performances were valuable, but Rollins’ production fit particularly well with Milwaukee’s overall balance.

Understanding Plus/Minus in This Game

Plus/minus is often misunderstood.

It represents the team’s scoring margin while a particular player is on the court.

It does not directly measure an individual’s complete performance.

For example, Bobby Portis scored 29 points and grabbed 10 rebounds but finished with a -4 plus/minus.

That does not mean he was a poor performer.

Similarly, Jarace Walker recorded 14 points, 8 rebounds, and 6 assists but finished -17.

The statistic should therefore be considered together with minutes, role, lineups, scoring efficiency, turnovers, and other box-score categories.

Most Important Numbers From the Game

Several numbers summarize the matchup particularly well.

134

Milwaukee’s final point total.

123

Indiana’s final point total.

31

Giannis’ points.

32

Nesmith’s points.

29

Portis’ points.

20

Rollins’ points.

14

Giannis’ rebounds.

11

McConnell’s assists.

18

Indiana’s turnovers.

9

Milwaukee’s turnovers.

40

Milwaukee’s third-quarter scoring total.

72

Milwaukee’s second-half points.

These figures collectively explain the game far better than the final score alone.

Lessons From the Player Statistics

The game provides several useful lessons for anyone studying basketball statistics.

First, efficient shooting cannot compensate indefinitely for poor possession control.

Second, offensive rebounding creates valuable second chances.

Third, a team’s depth matters when its primary star is unavailable.

Fourth, assists should be considered alongside turnovers.

Fifth, plus/minus needs context.

Sixth, individual scoring does not necessarily determine the winner.

Indiana had the game’s highest scorer in Nesmith.

Milwaukee still won by 11 points.

The difference was the broader team performance.

Milwaukee Bucks vs Pacers Match Player Stats: Overall Assessment

The milwaukee bucks vs pacers match player stats show a game in which both teams had impressive offensive stretches, but Milwaukee eventually gained control through better possession management and second-half execution.

Giannis Antetokounmpo was Milwaukee’s most complete player.

Bobby Portis was the team’s most important secondary scorer.

Ryan Rollins provided efficient backcourt production.

Kyle Kuzma contributed as a passer.

Myles Turner, AJ Green, and Taurean Prince provided efficient perimeter shooting.

For Indiana, Aaron Nesmith delivered the best scoring performance.

T.J. McConnell was the primary playmaker.

Jarace Walker provided versatility.

Jay Huff and Obi Toppin gave the bench useful scoring.

The difference was not a lack of individual production from Indiana.

It was the ability to turn that production into sustained team control.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points in the Bucks vs Pacers game?

Aaron Nesmith was the game’s leading scorer with 32 points for Indiana. Giannis Antetokounmpo led Milwaukee with 31 points.

How many points did Giannis Antetokounmpo score?

Giannis Antetokounmpo scored 31 points. He also recorded 14 rebounds and 8 assists.

Who led the Pacers in assists?

T.J. McConnell led Indiana with 11 assists.

Who had the most rebounds in the game?

Giannis Antetokounmpo led all players with 14 rebounds.

What was the final score?

The Milwaukee Bucks defeated the Indiana Pacers 134-123.

Which team committed fewer turnovers?

Milwaukee committed 9 turnovers, while Indiana committed 18. The Bucks therefore had a nine-turnover advantage.

Conclusion

The milwaukee bucks vs pacers match player stats from March 16, 2026 show that Milwaukee’s 134-123 victory was built on more than star power.

Giannis Antetokounmpo produced 31 points, 14 rebounds, and 8 assists in only 23 minutes. Bobby Portis added 29 points and 10 rebounds, while Ryan Rollins contributed 20 points, 7 assists, and 3 steals. Milwaukee also received important shooting from Myles Turner, AJ Green, and Taurean Prince.

Indiana had its own outstanding performances. Aaron Nesmith scored 32 points while shooting 10-of-14 from the field and 7-of-10 from three. T.J. McConnell recorded 11 assists, and Jarace Walker delivered 14 points, 8 rebounds, and 6 assists without a turnover.

The statistical difference came from the details.

Both teams shot above 50% from the field. Both teams shot at least 50% from three. Also, both finished with 40 rebounds.

But Milwaukee committed only 9 turnovers compared with Indiana’s 18, collected 13 offensive rebounds, recorded 10 steals, and scored 72 points in the second half.

The third quarter ultimately changed the game. Milwaukee scored 40 points and took control before finishing the fourth quarter strongly.

For anyone studying the game beyond the final score, the central lesson is simple: efficient shooting matters, but possession control, second-chance opportunities, defensive pressure, and balanced scoring can be just as important.

The supplied player statistics therefore present a clear picture of a Milwaukee team that found multiple ways to win, even against an Indiana offense that produced excellent individual scoring and passing numbers.