jacksonville jaguars vs buffalo bills match player stats

The jacksonville jaguars vs buffalo bills match player stats from the AFC Wild Card Playoffs on January 11, 2026 tell the story of a tightly contested 27-24 Buffalo Bills victory. Jacksonville entered the game with a 13-4 record and a strong 7-2 home mark, while Buffalo arrived at 12-5 overall and 5-3 on the road. The final score was decided by a combination of Josh Allen’s efficient passing, his two rushing touchdowns, Buffalo’s two interceptions, and Jacksonville’s ability to produce 154 rushing yards. Looking beyond the scoreboard reveals a game where Jacksonville generated more rushing production, while Buffalo made better use of its passing efficiency and defensive takeaways.

Game Overview

The AFC Wild Card matchup between the Jacksonville Jaguars and Buffalo Bills produced one of the most competitive statistical profiles possible for a 27-24 playoff game.

Buffalo won, but the numbers show that Jacksonville had several areas of statistical strength.

The Jaguars rushed for 154 yards on 23 attempts, averaging 6.7 yards per carry. Buffalo managed only 79 rushing yards on 26 attempts, averaging 3.0 yards per carry.

That advantage on the ground did not translate into a win because Buffalo received strong quarterback production from Josh Allen and forced two interceptions.

Allen completed 28 of 35 passes for 273 yards, with one touchdown and no interceptions. His completion rate was 80 percent, and his passer rating was 108.7.

Trevor Lawrence completed 18 of 30 passes for 207 yards, throwing three touchdowns and two interceptions. His passer rating finished at 86.4.

The contrast is important. Lawrence produced more passing touchdowns, but Allen protected the football and consistently moved the offense.

Final Score

Category	Buffalo Bills	Jacksonville Jaguars
Final Score	27	24
Overall Record	12-5	13-4
Away/Home Record	5-3 away	7-2 home
Passing Yards	273	207
Rushing Yards	79	154
Total Offensive Yards	352	361
Passing Touchdowns	1	3
Rushing Touchdowns	2	0
Interceptions Thrown	0	2

The total yardage numbers make the result even more interesting. Jacksonville generated 361 yards compared with Buffalo’s 352, yet the Bills won by three points.

That is a useful reminder that total yardage alone does not determine a playoff game.

jacksonville jaguars vs buffalo bills match player stats

The most important individual statistics from this game come from the quarterback position, the running game, receiving production, and defensive takeaways.

Josh Allen’s Passing Performance

Josh Allen completed 28 of 35 attempts for 273 yards, averaging 7.8 yards per attempt.

His statistical line included:

• 28 completions
• 35 attempts
• 273 passing yards
• 7.8 yards per attempt
• 1 passing touchdown
• 0 interceptions
• 1 sack
• 12 sack yards lost
• 87.1 QBR
• 108.7 passer rating

The completion percentage was especially notable. Allen completed 80 percent of his passes, giving Buffalo a reliable passing foundation even though the rushing attack struggled to create consistent yardage.

The zero-interception figure was also critical.

In a three-point playoff game, protecting the football can be more valuable than producing spectacular volume. Allen avoided a turnover through the air while Jacksonville’s offense gave Buffalo two opportunities through interceptions.

Allen also contributed as a runner, which made his overall performance even more important.

Trevor Lawrence’s Passing Performance

Trevor Lawrence finished with:

• 18 completions
• 30 attempts
• 207 passing yards
• 6.9 yards per attempt
• 3 passing touchdowns
• 2 interceptions
• 1 sack
• 2 sack yards lost
• 30.0 QBR
• 86.4 passer rating

The three touchdown passes demonstrate that Lawrence was capable of producing explosive scoring drives.

However, the two interceptions were costly.

His 207 passing yards were also 66 fewer than Allen’s total. Jacksonville compensated for some of that difference through its running game, but the two turnovers prevented the Jaguars from converting their overall offensive production into a victory.

Quarterback Comparison

The quarterback comparison provides one of the clearest explanations for the final result.

Statistic	Josh Allen	Trevor Lawrence
Completions	28	18
Attempts	35	30
Completion Rate	80.0%	60.0%
Passing Yards	273	207
Yards/Attempt	7.8	6.9
Passing TDs	1	3
Interceptions	0	2
Sacks	1	1
QBR	87.1	30.0
Passer Rating	108.7	86.4

Allen had the superior efficiency and ball security.

Lawrence had more passing touchdowns, but those touchdowns were offset by the two interceptions and lower overall passing efficiency.

This is one of the strongest examples in the game of why a basic touchdown comparison can be misleading.

Buffalo Bills Rushing Production

Buffalo’s rushing attack was not particularly efficient.

The Bills recorded 26 carries for 79 yards, averaging only 3.0 yards per attempt.

James Cook III led the team with:

• 15 carries
• 46 yards
• 3.1 yards per carry
• 11-yard long
• 0 touchdowns

Josh Allen added:

• 11 carries
• 33 yards
• 3.0 yards per carry
• 10-yard long
• 2 touchdowns

Allen’s rushing touchdowns were particularly important because they gave Buffalo scoring production that did not depend entirely on the passing game.

The Bills struggled to generate large rushing gains, but Allen’s ability to convert opportunities near the goal line helped compensate.

James Cook III

Cook handled the largest share of Buffalo’s rushing attempts.

His 15 carries represented the majority of the team’s rushing workload, but his 46 yards showed how difficult it was for Buffalo to consistently establish the run.

An average of 3.1 yards per carry is not dominant production, but his workload helped keep the offensive structure balanced.

Josh Allen as a Runner

Allen’s 33 rushing yards were not overwhelming in volume, but his two rushing touchdowns were highly significant.

His contribution illustrates an important part of Buffalo’s offensive identity: the quarterback can become a scoring threat on the ground even when the running backs are not producing at a high efficiency.

Jacksonville Jaguars Rushing Production

Jacksonville had a clear statistical advantage on the ground.

The Jaguars finished with:

• 23 carries
• 154 rushing yards
• 6.7 yards per carry
• 0 rushing touchdowns
• 26-yard longest run

That is almost twice Buffalo’s rushing yardage despite having three fewer attempts.

The most important contributors were Travis Etienne Jr. and Bhayshul Tuten.

Travis Etienne Jr.

Etienne rushed 10 times for 67 yards, averaging 6.7 yards per carry.

His longest run was 26 yards.

That combination of workload and efficiency gave Jacksonville a strong foundation on the ground.

Etienne also contributed as a receiver, catching five passes for 49 yards and one touchdown.

His overall offensive involvement therefore extended beyond his rushing statistics.

Bhayshul Tuten

Tuten was one of Jacksonville’s most efficient runners.

He recorded:

• 4 carries
• 51 yards
• 12.8 yards per carry
• 20-yard long
• 3 kick returns for 49 yards

His 51 rushing yards on only four attempts show how explosive his limited workload was.

The 20-yard long run also helped explain Jacksonville’s impressive team rushing average.

Receiving Statistics

The receiving numbers reveal another major difference between the two offenses.

Buffalo recorded 28 receptions for 273 yards, while Jacksonville recorded 18 receptions for 207 yards.

Buffalo’s receiving production was more evenly distributed.

Jacksonville received a major contribution from Parker Washington, who led the game in receiving yards.

Buffalo Receiving Leaders

Khalil Shakir

Khalil Shakir led Buffalo in receptions and receiving yards:

• 12 receptions
• 82 yards
• 6.8 yards per reception
• 18-yard long
• 12 targets
• 0 touchdowns

His 12 receptions were especially important because they gave Allen a reliable short and intermediate option.

Shakir accounted for a significant share of Buffalo’s completed passes, helping maintain offensive consistency.

Brandin Cooks

Brandin Cooks produced fewer receptions but generated considerable yardage:

• 3 receptions
• 58 yards
• 19.3 yards per reception
• 36-yard long
• 5 targets

His 36-yard reception was Buffalo’s longest receiving play listed in the game statistics.

This is an excellent example of how a receiver can have a relatively small target total while still producing meaningful explosive yardage.

Keon Coleman

Keon Coleman had:

• 1 reception
• 36 yards
• 36.0 yards per reception
• 36-yard long
• 1 target

His single reception matched the longest reception recorded by Buffalo.

Dawson Knox

Dawson Knox finished with:

• 3 receptions
• 30 yards
• 10.0 yards per reception
• 24-yard long
• 3 targets

Knox contributed another dependable option in Buffalo’s passing attack.

Dalton Kincaid

Dalton Kincaid recorded:

• 3 receptions
• 28 yards
• 9.3 yards per reception
• 15-yard long
• 5 targets
• 1 touchdown

His touchdown was Buffalo’s only passing touchdown in the game.

Jacksonville Receiving Leaders

Parker Washington

Parker Washington was Jacksonville’s leading receiver.

His numbers were:

• 7 receptions
• 107 yards
• 15.3 yards per reception
• 34-yard long
• 12 targets
• 1 touchdown

Washington’s 107 yards represented more than half of Jacksonville’s passing yardage.

His 15.3 yards per reception also showed that his production was not limited to short completions.

Travis Etienne Jr.

Etienne added substantial receiving production:

• 5 receptions
• 49 yards
• 9.8 yards per reception
• 14-yard long
• 1 touchdown
• 5 targets

When combined with his 67 rushing yards, Etienne produced 116 yards from scrimmage.

That makes his overall contribution one of the most important individual offensive performances for Jacksonville.

Brian Thomas Jr.

Brian Thomas Jr. recorded:

• 2 receptions
• 21 yards
• 10.5 yards per reception
• 18-yard long
• 1 touchdown
• 2 targets

His receiving volume was limited, but his touchdown gave Jacksonville another scoring option.

Receiving Comparison

Player	Team	Receptions	Yards	Avg.	TDs	Long
Khalil Shakir	Buffalo	12	82	6.8	0	18
Brandin Cooks	Buffalo	3	58	19.3	0	36
Keon Coleman	Buffalo	1	36	36.0	0	36
Dawson Knox	Buffalo	3	30	10.0	0	24
Dalton Kincaid	Buffalo	3	28	9.3	1	15
Parker Washington	Jacksonville	7	107	15.3	1	34
Travis Etienne Jr.	Jacksonville	5	49	9.8	1	14
Brian Thomas Jr.	Jacksonville	2	21	10.5	1	18

The contrast is revealing.

Buffalo spread the passing workload across several players, with Shakir serving as the main volume receiver.

Jacksonville’s passing game relied more heavily on Washington for yardage.

Defensive Player Statistics

Defense played a major role in the outcome, particularly because Buffalo created two interceptions.

The Bills recorded:

• 49 total tackles
• 38 solo tackles
• 1 sack
• 3 tackles for loss
• 9 passes defended
• 3 quarterback hits
• 2 interceptions

Jacksonville recorded:

• 65 total tackles
• 45 solo tackles
• 1 sack
• 1 tackle for loss
• 3 quarterback hits
• 0 interceptions

The higher tackle totals for Jacksonville reflect the volume of defensive activity required during the game, but Buffalo’s two interceptions were more directly connected to creating possession-changing opportunities.

Shaq Thompson

Shaq Thompson led Buffalo’s defense with:

• 8 tackles
• 6 solo tackles
• 1 interception
• 19 interception return yards

His interception was one of Buffalo’s two takeaways.

Cole Bishop

Cole Bishop also intercepted Lawrence.

His interception return covered two yards.

Together, Thompson and Bishop accounted for the two Jacksonville passing turnovers.

Greg Rousseau

Greg Rousseau recorded Buffalo’s only sack.

The Bills also generated three quarterback hits, showing that their pass rush contributed pressure even without producing a large sack total.

Jacksonville Defensive Leaders

Eric Murray led Jacksonville with:

• 7 tackles
• 4 solo tackles

Josh Hines-Allen recorded Jacksonville’s only sack.

The Jaguars also produced three quarterback hits.

Although Jacksonville’s defense did not intercept Allen, the unit generated enough pressure to keep the game competitive.

Turnovers and Ball Security

Turnovers were one of the clearest statistical differences.

Buffalo threw zero interceptions.

Jacksonville threw two interceptions.

That two-turnover difference is especially important in a playoff game decided by three points.

Buffalo did have a fumble from Ray Davis, and that fumble was lost.

Jacksonville’s Devin Lloyd recorded a fumble recovery, with the defensive statistics showing no fumble charged to him.

Therefore, Buffalo was not completely mistake-free, but the Bills were much cleaner in the passing game.

The key distinction is that Allen did not give Jacksonville an interception opportunity, while Lawrence gave Buffalo two.

Special Teams Statistics

Special teams also contributed to the final margin.

Buffalo Kicking

Matt Prater converted:

• 2 of 2 field goals
• 100 percent field goal rate
• 50-yard longest field goal
• 3 of 3 extra points
• 9 total points

Prater’s perfect field goal performance gave Buffalo reliable scoring production.

Jacksonville Kicking

Cam Little finished with:

• 1 of 2 field goals
• 50 percent field goal rate
• 43-yard longest field goal
• 3 of 3 extra points
• 6 total points

The missed field goal created a notable contrast with Prater’s perfect performance.

In a game decided by three points, every scoring opportunity deserves attention.

Kick Returns

Ray Davis was particularly productive for Buffalo in the return game.

He recorded:

• 4 kick returns
• 119 return yards
• 29.8 yards per return
• 34-yard long

Jacksonville’s return production included:

• Bhayshul Tuten: 3 returns for 49 yards
• LeQuint Allen Jr.: 1 return for 26 yards

Neither team recorded a punt return.

Where the Game Was Won

The statistics suggest that Buffalo did not win because it dominated every category.

Instead, the Bills won through a combination of efficiency, quarterback execution, scoring opportunities, and defensive takeaways.

1. Buffalo Protected the Passing Game

Allen’s 28-for-35 performance was highly efficient.

He completed 80 percent of his attempts and did not throw an interception.

That gave Buffalo consistent possession without giving Jacksonville extra opportunities through passing turnovers.

2. Allen Added Two Rushing Touchdowns

Buffalo’s running backs averaged only 3.0 yards per carry as a team.

Yet Allen scored twice on the ground.

Those rushing touchdowns were critical because they compensated for the limited rushing efficiency.

3. Buffalo Created Two Interceptions

The two interceptions thrown by Lawrence were perhaps the biggest defensive difference.

Jacksonville had 154 rushing yards and 361 total offensive yards, but those numbers were undermined by the turnovers.

4. Jacksonville Won the Rushing Battle

Jacksonville’s 154 rushing yards were 75 more than Buffalo’s 79.

The Jaguars averaged 6.7 yards per carry compared with Buffalo’s 3.0.

This was one of Jacksonville’s clearest statistical advantages.

5. Buffalo Had More Passing Volume

The Bills completed 28 passes for 273 yards.

Jacksonville completed 18 for 207 yards.

Buffalo therefore gained 66 more passing yards and completed 10 more passes.

6. Special Teams Favored Buffalo

Prater made both of his field goal attempts.

Little converted only one of two.

In a three-point game, that difference is meaningful.

What the Total Yardage Says

The final offensive yardage was surprisingly close.

Buffalo generated 273 passing yards and 79 rushing yards for 352 total yards.

Jacksonville produced 207 passing yards and 154 rushing yards for 361 total yards.

That means Jacksonville actually gained nine more total yards.

Yet Buffalo won.

This is an important lesson when analyzing football statistics: yardage describes offensive production, but it does not fully describe efficiency, possession value, turnovers, or scoring execution.

Jacksonville’s 361 yards were not enough because two interceptions disrupted the offense.

Buffalo’s 352 yards were enough because the Bills converted their opportunities more effectively.

The Importance of Explosive Plays

Explosive plays appear throughout the player statistics.

Buffalo’s longest reception was 36 yards, produced by both Brandin Cooks and Keon Coleman.

Jacksonville’s longest reception was 34 yards from Parker Washington.

Etienne had a 26-yard rushing gain.

Tuten added a 20-yard rushing gain.

These plays explain why both offenses were capable of generating scoring opportunities despite stretches of less efficient production.

The difference was not simply the ability to create big plays. Both teams demonstrated that ability.

The difference was how those plays interacted with turnovers and scoring efficiency.

A Closer Look at Offensive Balance

Buffalo’s offensive balance was unusual because the team struggled to run the ball efficiently but still maintained a productive overall attack.

The Bills ran 26 times for 79 yards.

They also completed 28 passes for 273 yards.

Jacksonville, meanwhile, produced 154 rushing yards and 207 passing yards.

That creates two distinct offensive profiles.

Buffalo leaned more heavily on efficient passing.

Jacksonville relied more on its rushing attack.

Neither approach was inherently superior. The decisive factor was execution in the highest-value situations.

What the Numbers Say About Josh Allen

Allen’s statistics show why his performance was central to Buffalo’s victory.

His 273 passing yards ranked above Lawrence’s 207 yards.

His 108.7 passer rating was also higher than Lawrence’s 86.4.

His QBR of 87.1 was substantially higher than Lawrence’s 30.0.

Most importantly, Allen avoided an interception.

He also rushed for 33 yards and two touchdowns.

This means Allen contributed both through the air and on the ground.

His performance was not based on one spectacular statistic. It was the combination of accuracy, passing efficiency, ball security, and rushing touchdowns.

What the Numbers Say About Trevor Lawrence

Lawrence’s three touchdown passes show that Jacksonville’s quarterback was able to finish drives through the air.

However, his 60 percent completion rate and two interceptions created problems.

The Jaguars’ offensive statistics suggest that Lawrence did not have to carry the offense alone because Jacksonville’s rushing game was highly productive.

Etienne and Tuten combined for 118 rushing yards on 14 carries.

That gave Jacksonville a strong complementary foundation.

But the two interceptions became especially costly because Buffalo was able to turn those extra possessions into a winning margin.

The Role of Khalil Shakir

Shakir’s 12 receptions were the highest reception total among the listed players.

He also received 12 targets.

That indicates a strong connection between Allen and Shakir throughout the passing game.

His 82 yards were not the most explosive receiving total, but his workload provided consistency.

A receiver does not need to score a touchdown to have a major statistical impact.

Shakir’s value came from helping Buffalo sustain its passing offense.

Parker Washington’s Breakout Statistical Performance

Washington was Jacksonville’s leading receiver with 107 yards and one touchdown.

His 15.3 yards per reception was significantly higher than Shakir’s 6.8.

That tells us that Washington was used more aggressively as a downfield receiving option.

The seven receptions on 12 targets also show that Jacksonville repeatedly looked in his direction.

Despite his strong performance, Jacksonville could not convert that production into a win.

This is another example of why individual receiving statistics must be viewed alongside quarterback turnovers and overall team efficiency.

Why Jacksonville’s Rushing Advantage Was Not Enough

At first glance, Jacksonville’s rushing statistics look like a major advantage.

The Jaguars averaged 6.7 yards per carry.

Buffalo averaged only 3.0.

Jacksonville gained 154 rushing yards.

Buffalo gained 79.

Yet rushing efficiency alone did not decide the contest.

Jacksonville did not record a rushing touchdown.

Buffalo recorded two, both from Allen.

That scoring difference matters.

Buffalo’s running game may have produced fewer yards, but the quarterback’s rushing ability allowed the team to finish drives on the ground.

The Three-Point Margin

The final score of 27-24 means Buffalo won by exactly three points.

Several statistical details align with that narrow margin:

• Buffalo made both field goal attempts.
• Jacksonville made one of two field goal attempts.
• Buffalo threw zero interceptions.
• Jacksonville threw two interceptions.
• Buffalo scored two rushing touchdowns.
• Jacksonville scored three passing touchdowns.
• Jacksonville produced 154 rushing yards.
• Buffalo produced 273 passing yards.

The game therefore cannot be explained by one category.

It was a collection of small advantages that ultimately produced the three-point difference.

How to Read These Player Stats Correctly

When evaluating jacksonville jaguars vs buffalo bills match player stats, it is useful to separate volume statistics from efficiency statistics.

Volume tells you how much a player was involved.

Efficiency tells you what the player did with that involvement.

For example, Cook carried the ball 15 times, which was a high workload, but averaged only 3.1 yards per carry.

Tuten carried the ball only four times but averaged 12.8 yards per carry.

Shakir caught 12 passes for 82 yards.

Cooks caught only three passes but gained 58 yards.

Neither comparison means one player was automatically more valuable in every situation.

The context of each player’s role matters.

Most Significant Statistical Performances

Several players stand out based on the supplied game data.

Josh Allen

Allen combined:

• 273 passing yards
• 1 passing touchdown
• 0 interceptions
• 33 rushing yards
• 2 rushing touchdowns
• 108.7 passer rating

His overall statistical contribution was central to Buffalo’s victory.

Khalil Shakir

Shakir led Buffalo with 12 receptions and 82 receiving yards.

His role was primarily volume and consistency.

Parker Washington

Washington led Jacksonville with 107 receiving yards and one touchdown.

His 15.3 yards per reception made him the Jaguars’ most productive receiver by yardage.

Travis Etienne Jr.

Etienne produced 67 rushing yards and 49 receiving yards, giving him 116 combined yards from scrimmage.

He was one of Jacksonville’s most complete offensive contributors.

Shaq Thompson

Thompson led Buffalo with eight tackles and added an interception.

His performance combined defensive volume with a possession-changing play.

Key Statistical Takeaways

The most important lessons from the game can be summarized simply.

1. Buffalo won the passing efficiency battle. Allen completed 80 percent of his attempts and threw no interceptions.
2. Jacksonville won the rushing battle. The Jaguars gained 154 rushing yards compared with Buffalo’s 79.
3. Buffalo won the turnover battle. The Bills intercepted Lawrence twice.
4. Allen’s rushing touchdowns mattered. Buffalo’s quarterback scored twice on the ground.
5. Parker Washington was Jacksonville’s leading receiver. He produced 107 yards and one touchdown.
6. Khalil Shakir led Buffalo in receiving volume. He caught 12 passes for 82 yards.
7. Buffalo’s kicking was perfect on field goals. Prater converted both attempts.
8. Jacksonville generated more total yards but still lost. The Jaguars produced 361 yards compared with Buffalo’s 352.
9. The game was decided by execution rather than yardage alone. Buffalo’s ball security and takeaways were critical.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Jacksonville Jaguars and Buffalo Bills?

The Buffalo Bills defeated the Jacksonville Jaguars 27-24 in the AFC Wild Card Playoffs on January 11, 2026.

Who had the most passing yards in the game?

Josh Allen led all passers with 273 yards on 28 completions from 35 attempts. Trevor Lawrence finished with 207 passing yards.

Who led the Jaguars in receiving?

Parker Washington led Jacksonville with 7 receptions for 107 yards and one touchdown.

Who led the Bills in receiving?

Khalil Shakir led Buffalo with 12 receptions for 82 yards.

Which team had more rushing yards?

Jacksonville had the stronger rushing performance. The Jaguars recorded 154 rushing yards, compared with 79 for Buffalo.

How many interceptions did each quarterback throw?

Josh Allen threw zero interceptions, while Trevor Lawrence threw two interceptions. Shaq Thompson and Cole Bishop recorded the interceptions for Buffalo.

Conclusion

The jacksonville jaguars vs buffalo bills match player stats show a playoff game that was far more competitive than the final three-point margin might suggest.

Jacksonville finished with more total yards and a huge advantage in rushing production. Etienne and Tuten helped the Jaguars average 6.7 yards per rushing attempt, while Parker Washington delivered a 107-yard receiving performance.

Buffalo’s advantage came from a different combination of factors. Josh Allen completed 28 of 35 passes for 273 yards, avoided interceptions, and added two rushing touchdowns. Khalil Shakir provided dependable receiving volume, while Buffalo’s defense generated two interceptions through Shaq Thompson and Cole Bishop.

Special teams also mattered. Matt Prater converted both field goal attempts, while Jacksonville’s Cam Little made one of two.

Ultimately, the statistics show why Buffalo won despite Jacksonville producing more total yards. The Bills were more efficient in the passing game, protected the football better, created two takeaways, and received critical rushing touchdowns from their quarterback.

For anyone studying this matchup, the most useful takeaway is that the box score should be read as a complete story rather than a collection of isolated numbers. Jacksonville’s rushing superiority was real, but Buffalo’s combination of passing efficiency, turnover creation, quarterback rushing production, and field-goal accuracy proved decisive in a 27-24 playoff battle.