Milwaukee Bucks vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats
The milwaukee bucks vs dallas mavericks match player stats from April 1, 2026, tell a much deeper story than the final score alone. Milwaukee defeated Dallas 123-99 at Fiserv Forum, but the most useful way to understand this matchup is to examine how individual players contributed to scoring, rebounding, playmaking, efficiency, defense, and overall game control. Ryan Rollins was the standout performer for Milwaukee with 24 points, 9 assists, and a team-best +33 plus/minus, while Cooper Flagg led Dallas in scoring with 19 points. Moussa Cisse provided Dallas with 13 rebounds, and Jericho Sims led Milwaukee with 9 rebounds.
The result was also significant in the season series. Milwaukee moved to 2-0 against Dallas after previously winning 116-114 on November 11, 2025. Although Dallas produced 50 rebounds and 12 steals, Milwaukee controlled the more important offensive efficiency indicators, shooting 45% from the field compared with Dallas at 35%, while also making 20 of 54 three-point attempts for a 37% rate.
Milwaukee Bucks vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats
The clearest starting point is the individual production that shaped the game. Milwaukee’s leading scorer, Ryan Rollins, finished with 24 points and also delivered 9 assists. His +33 plus/minus was the best mark on either team, making his performance particularly notable because his influence extended beyond scoring.
For Dallas, Cooper Flagg was the top scorer with 19 points. That number was respectable, but Dallas did not have enough scoring efficiency around him to keep pace with Milwaukee. The Mavericks made only 34 of 96 field-goal attempts, while Milwaukee converted 41 of 92.
The leading individual statistical performances were:
| Player | Team | Key Performance |
| Ryan Rollins | Milwaukee Bucks | 24 points, 9 assists, +33 |
| Cooper Flagg | Dallas Mavericks | 19 points |
| Moussa Cisse | Dallas Mavericks | 13 rebounds, +1 |
| Jericho Sims | Milwaukee Bucks | 9 rebounds |
| Brandon Williams | Dallas Mavericks | 4 assists |
These numbers immediately reveal the different ways each team found production. Milwaukee received a highly productive all-around performance from Rollins, while Dallas leaned heavily on Flagg for scoring and Cisse for rebounding.
How Milwaukee Won the Game
Milwaukee’s 123-99 victory was built on several statistical advantages rather than one isolated category.
The Bucks shot 45% from the field and made 20 three-pointers. Dallas shot only 35% overall and made 10 threes. That difference in shot-making created a substantial offensive gap.
Milwaukee also finished with 28 assists compared with Dallas’ 18. That 10-assist advantage is important because it indicates that the Bucks generated more of their offense through connected team play.
The rebound battle also favored Milwaukee. The Bucks collected 59 rebounds compared with Dallas’ 50, giving them a nine-rebound advantage.
Milwaukee’s defense was another major factor. The Bucks recorded 9 blocks, more than twice Dallas’ 4.
The basic statistical comparison looked like this:
| Category | Dallas Mavericks | Milwaukee Bucks |
| Points | 99 | 123 |
| Field Goals | 34-96 | 41-92 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 35% | 45% |
| Three-Pointers | 10-36 | 20-54 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 28% | 37% |
| Free Throws | 21-28 | 21-26 |
| Rebounds | 50 | 59 |
| Assists | 18 | 28 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 16 |
| Steals | 12 | 7 |
| Blocks | 4 | 9 |
The Bucks did commit two more turnovers, and Dallas produced five more steals. Those numbers show that Milwaukee did not win because it dominated every category. Instead, the Bucks won because their shooting, ball movement, rebounding, and rim protection outweighed Dallas’ advantages in steals and turnovers.
Ryan Rollins Was Milwaukee’s Statistical Difference-Maker
Ryan Rollins produced the strongest overall statistical line available from this matchup.
His 24 points made him Milwaukee’s leading scorer. More importantly, he paired those points with 9 assists. That combination demonstrates that his role was not limited to finishing possessions.
The +33 plus/minus is also noteworthy.
Plus/minus should never be treated as a perfect measurement of individual performance because it reflects what happens while a player is on the court and is affected by teammates and opponents. However, a +33 mark in a 24-point victory is still a strong indication that Milwaukee controlled the game during Rollins’ minutes.
Rollins’ performance can therefore be viewed through three connected areas:
- Scoring: He led Milwaukee with 24 points.
- Playmaking: He finished with 9 assists, the best assist total listed for either team.
- On-court impact: His +33 was the highest plus/minus in the game.
That combination makes Rollins the most influential individual performer in this matchup based on the supplied statistics.
Cooper Flagg Led Dallas in Scoring
Cooper Flagg finished as Dallas’ leading scorer with 19 points.
For a team that scored 99 points, Flagg’s contribution was important, but the larger problem was efficiency. Dallas attempted 96 field goals and made only 34, resulting in a 35% shooting percentage.
That means Dallas generated plenty of attempts without converting them at a high enough rate.
Flagg’s 19 points therefore need to be considered within the team’s broader offensive performance. His scoring was not enough to overcome Milwaukee’s superior shooting.
Dallas’ starting lineup featured Khris Middleton, Daniel Gafford, Cooper Flagg, Max Christie, and Ryan Nembhard. With Flagg serving as the team’s leading scorer, the Mavericks needed more efficient production across the lineup to challenge Milwaukee’s offensive output.
Moussa Cisse Controlled the Rebounding Battle for Dallas
Moussa Cisse led Dallas with 13 rebounds, which was the highest individual rebounding total listed for either team.
His contribution helped Dallas finish with 50 total rebounds. That number would normally represent a solid foundation for a competitive game, but Milwaukee finished with 59.
Cisse’s +1 plus/minus is also interesting. While Dallas lost by 24 points, Cisse was the only listed Dallas player identified with a positive plus/minus, at +1.
This is a useful reminder that team results and individual statistical impact do not always move together. A player can perform well in a particular area while the overall team struggles.
Jericho Sims Led Milwaukee in Rebounding
Jericho Sims recorded 9 rebounds to lead Milwaukee individually in that category.
His contribution formed part of a broader team rebounding effort. Milwaukee collected 59 rebounds, nine more than Dallas.
Rebounding was especially valuable because Milwaukee also shot more efficiently. When a team combines superior shooting with a significant rebounding advantage, it becomes harder for the opponent to compensate.
Dallas did produce 50 rebounds, but Milwaukee’s nine-rebound advantage helped reinforce its control of the game.
Brandon Williams and the Dallas Playmaking Numbers
Brandon Williams led Dallas with 4 assists.
That total was below Ryan Rollins’ 9 assists for Milwaukee and also reflected the larger team difference. Dallas finished with 18 assists, while Milwaukee recorded 28.
The 10-assist gap is one of the most important statistical differences in the game.
Assists do not automatically determine which team will win, but they can reveal how effectively a team creates shared scoring opportunities. In this matchup, Milwaukee’s higher assist total accompanied a better field-goal percentage and a much stronger three-point percentage.
That combination suggests that Milwaukee’s offensive possessions were generally more productive.
Shooting Efficiency Was the Biggest Difference
If one statistical category deserves special attention, it is shooting efficiency.
Dallas:
- 34 made field goals out of 96 attempts
- 35% field-goal shooting
- 10 made three-pointers out of 36 attempts
- 28% three-point shooting
Milwaukee:
- 41 made field goals out of 92 attempts
- 45% field-goal shooting
- 20 made three-pointers out of 54 attempts
- 37% three-point shooting
The Bucks made seven more field goals despite taking four fewer attempts.
That is a major difference.
Milwaukee also doubled Dallas’ made three-pointers, 20 to 10. The three-point shooting gap was 37% to 28%.
This is why simply looking at the number of shots taken would not explain the result. Dallas actually attempted more field goals, but Milwaukee converted a much greater proportion of its opportunities.
The Three-Point Battle Changed the Score
Three-point shooting deserves separate attention because Milwaukee’s advantage was particularly large.
The Bucks made 20 three-pointers. Dallas made 10.
That means Milwaukee made 10 more shots from beyond the arc.
At three points each, those additional made threes represent a substantial scoring advantage before considering any other scoring source.
Milwaukee’s 37% three-point rate was also nine percentage points higher than Dallas’ 28%.
Dallas attempted 36 three-pointers, while Milwaukee attempted 54. The Bucks were therefore both more aggressive from outside and more successful.
This is one of the clearest explanations for how Milwaukee reached 123 points while Dallas remained at 99.
Free-Throw Shooting Was Relatively Close
Free-throw shooting did not create the same separation.
Dallas went 21-for-28 at the line, an accuracy rate of 75%.
Milwaukee went 21-for-26, converting at 81%.
Both teams made exactly 21 free throws.
Milwaukee’s advantage came from efficiency rather than a larger number of successful free throws. The Bucks missed five free throws, while Dallas missed seven.
This category therefore had a relatively limited effect compared with field-goal and three-point shooting.
Rebounding Favored Milwaukee
Milwaukee collected 59 rebounds compared with Dallas’ 50.
The nine-rebound difference was significant because it gave the Bucks another area of control outside pure shooting.
Dallas had an individual standout in Moussa Cisse, who collected 13 rebounds. Milwaukee, however, produced the stronger overall team total.
That distinction matters when analyzing match statistics. An individual rebounding leader does not necessarily indicate which team controlled the glass. In this game, Cisse led the individual category, but Milwaukee won the overall rebounding battle.
Milwaukee Had the Better Passing Numbers
The Bucks recorded 28 assists.
Dallas recorded 18.
That 10-assist difference is one of the strongest team-level indicators in the matchup.
Milwaukee’s passing advantage also aligns with its shooting efficiency. More assists can indicate that players were creating cleaner opportunities for teammates rather than relying entirely on difficult individual shots.
Dallas’ 18 assists were not disastrous in isolation, but they were clearly behind Milwaukee’s 28.
Ryan Rollins was the individual leader with 9 assists, while Brandon Williams led Dallas with 4.
Dallas Created More Steals
One of the few statistical categories Dallas won was steals.
The Mavericks recorded 12 steals compared with Milwaukee’s 7.
Dallas therefore produced five more steals.
The Mavericks also committed 14 turnovers, while Milwaukee committed 16.
Those two numbers show that Dallas was capable of creating defensive pressure and forcing Milwaukee into mistakes. However, those defensive advantages were not enough to compensate for Milwaukee’s superior shooting and offensive execution.
This is an important part of the game’s statistical story. Dallas did several things well defensively, but Milwaukee’s efficiency produced a larger overall advantage.
Blocks Highlight Milwaukee’s Defensive Presence
Milwaukee recorded 9 blocks compared with Dallas’ 4.
That five-block advantage matched Dallas’ five-steal advantage in the opposite direction.
The Bucks’ nine blocks indicate stronger rim protection in the final statistical record.
When combined with the 59 rebounds, the block total suggests that Milwaukee had a significant physical presence around the basket.
Dallas did not lack defensive activity, as its 12 steals demonstrate, but the type of defensive impact was different.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The game was competitive only in stretches because Milwaukee built an advantage early and maintained it.
The quarter scores were:
| Quarter | Dallas | Milwaukee |
| 1st | 31 | 38 |
| 2nd | 20 | 27 |
| 3rd | 19 | 25 |
| 4th | 29 | 33 |
| Total | 99 | 123 |
Milwaukee won every quarter.
That is particularly important.
The Bucks did not build the entire margin in one period and then simply survive. They outscored Dallas in the first, second, third, and fourth quarters.
The first quarter ended with Milwaukee ahead 38-31.
The Bucks then extended the advantage by winning the second quarter 27-20.
Milwaukee also won the third quarter 25-19.
In the fourth, Dallas improved its scoring output to 29 points, but Milwaukee still scored 33.
This consistency helps explain the final 24-point margin.
The First Half Established Milwaukee’s Control
The halftime score can be calculated from the supplied quarter totals.
Dallas scored 31 plus 20 for 51 first-half points.
Milwaukee scored 38 plus 27 for 65.
That gave Milwaukee a 14-point halftime advantage.
The Bucks therefore entered the second half already in control.
Dallas did not produce a major third-quarter comeback. Instead, Milwaukee added another six points to its lead by winning the period 25-19.
By the time the fourth quarter began, the game had become increasingly difficult for Dallas to turn around.
Dallas Improved in the Fourth Quarter
Dallas scored 29 points in the fourth quarter, its second-highest quarter total of the game.
Milwaukee still scored 33.
That difference illustrates why the Mavericks could not make meaningful progress on the scoreboard late in the game.
The fourth quarter was not a collapse by Dallas. It was simply another quarter in which Milwaukee remained more productive.
This distinction is useful when interpreting the final score. A 24-point defeat does not necessarily mean the losing team was equally poor throughout every minute. Here, Dallas continued to score, but Milwaukee maintained its offensive advantage.
Milwaukee’s Starting Lineup
The Bucks started:
- Kyle Kuzma
- Myles Turner
- Jericho Sims
- Gary Trent Jr.
- Ryan Rollins
This lineup provides context for the individual performances recorded in the game.
Rollins was the leading scorer and assist provider among the supplied statistics, while Sims led the team in rebounds.
The combination of Rollins’ offensive production and Sims’ rebounding contribution reflected the broader team strengths seen in the box score.
Dallas’ Starting Lineup
Dallas started:
- Khris Middleton
- Daniel Gafford
- Cooper Flagg
- Max Christie
- Ryan Nembhard
Cooper Flagg was the leading scorer from this group and the Mavericks overall with 19 points.
The lineup faced a difficult statistical challenge because Milwaukee won the shooting battle, rebounding battle, assist battle, and blocks category.
Dallas’ stronger numbers in steals and turnovers were not sufficient to reverse those disadvantages.
Milwaukee’s 123 Points Put the Game in Perspective
Scoring 123 points while winning every quarter is a strong indicator of offensive consistency.
Milwaukee reached that total despite taking fewer field-goal attempts than Dallas.
The Bucks attempted 92 field goals.
Dallas attempted 96.
Yet Milwaukee scored 24 more points.
That difference is largely explained by efficiency.
Milwaukee made 41 field goals at a 45% rate, while Dallas made 34 at 35%.
The Bucks also made 20 three-pointers compared with Dallas’ 10.
This is why the final score should not be interpreted simply as a matter of volume. Milwaukee was substantially more effective with its opportunities.
What Dallas Could Have Done Differently
The statistics suggest several areas where Dallas would have needed improvement to make this a closer contest.
Improve Field-Goal Efficiency
A 35% field-goal rate made it difficult for Dallas to maintain offensive pressure.
The Mavericks generated 96 attempts, which was more than Milwaukee, but too many attempts failed to become points.
Increase Three-Point Accuracy
Dallas made 10 of 36 three-point attempts.
At 28%, that was significantly below Milwaukee’s 37%.
A more efficient perimeter performance could have reduced the scoring gap.
Convert Ball Pressure Into More Offense
Dallas recorded 12 steals and forced Milwaukee into 16 turnovers.
Those were positive defensive indicators.
The challenge was turning those extra possessions into enough efficient scoring to offset Milwaukee’s shooting advantage.
Create More Assisted Offense
Dallas finished with 18 assists compared with Milwaukee’s 28.
Improving ball movement could have helped Dallas generate higher-quality attempts rather than relying on lower-efficiency possessions.
What Milwaukee Did Particularly Well
Milwaukee’s performance was balanced.
The Bucks:
- Shot 45% from the field.
- Shot 37% from three-point range.
- Made 20 three-pointers.
- Collected 59 rebounds.
- Recorded 28 assists.
- Blocked 9 shots.
- Won every quarter.
- Had the game’s highest individual plus/minus through Ryan Rollins at +33.
That is a broad statistical foundation.
The Bucks did not need to rely on one category because they performed well across multiple areas.
Milwaukee Bucks vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats: Biggest Takeaways
The milwaukee bucks vs dallas mavericks match player stats become much more meaningful when individual performances are connected to the team numbers.
Ryan Rollins was the clearest all-around standout for Milwaukee. His 24 points, 9 assists, and +33 plus/minus represented the strongest combination of scoring, playmaking, and on-court impact.
Cooper Flagg led Dallas with 19 points, giving the Mavericks an important scoring contribution.
Moussa Cisse stood out on the glass with 13 rebounds.
Jericho Sims led Milwaukee in rebounding with 9.
Brandon Williams led Dallas in assists with 4.
At the team level, Milwaukee’s biggest advantages came from shooting efficiency, three-point production, assists, rebounding, and blocks.
Dallas’ strongest statistical areas were steals and turnovers. Those advantages, however, were not enough to overcome Milwaukee’s offensive efficiency.
Why the 24-Point Margin Makes Sense Statistically
A 123-99 final score can sometimes make a game look simpler than it actually was.
In this case, the statistical profile supports the margin.
Milwaukee won:
- Field-goal percentage: 45% to 35%
- Three-point percentage: 37% to 28%
- Made three-pointers: 20 to 10
- Rebounds: 59 to 50
- Assists: 28 to 18
- Blocks: 9 to 4
- Every individual quarter
Dallas won:
- Steals: 12 to 7
- Turnovers committed: 14 to 16
The most important point is that Dallas’ advantages were not enough to compensate for Milwaukee’s advantages in high-impact scoring and possession-control categories.
Season Series Context
Milwaukee completed the season series sweep with a 2-0 record against Dallas.
The previous meeting ended with Milwaukee winning 116-114 on November 11, 2025.
The second meeting was much less competitive.
Milwaukee won 123-99 on April 1, 2026, producing a 24-point victory.
Across the two listed meetings, Milwaukee therefore demonstrated that it could beat Dallas in both a close game and a more decisive contest.
The first matchup was decided by two points.
The second was decided by 24.
That contrast makes the second game particularly useful for examining statistical dominance.
Game Details at a Glance
| Detail | Information |
| Game | Dallas Mavericks vs. Milwaukee Bucks |
| Date | April 1, 2026 |
| Venue | Fiserv Forum, Milwaukee, Wisconsin |
| Attendance | 16,414 |
| Final Score | Milwaukee 123, Dallas 99 |
| Dallas Record | 24-52 overall, 10-28 away |
| Milwaukee Record | 30-45 overall, 17-21 home |
| Season Series | Milwaukee leads 2-0 |
| Game Status | Final |
| Officials | Mark Lindsay, Kevin Scott, Natalie Sago |
The attendance was 16,414 at Fiserv Forum.
Dallas entered the game with a 24-52 overall record and a 10-28 away record. Milwaukee entered at 30-45 overall and 17-21 at home.
Those records provide additional context but do not explain the result as clearly as the actual game statistics. The box score shows precisely where the matchup was won.
How to Read Player Statistics From This Game
For readers who want to evaluate games beyond the final score, this matchup provides a useful framework.
Start with scoring, but do not stop there.
A player’s points total tells you how much scoring he produced, but assists can reveal playmaking value, rebounds can reveal possession control, and plus/minus can provide additional context about team performance during a player’s minutes.
For this game, the hierarchy is particularly clear:
- Ryan Rollins: strongest overall listed performance for Milwaukee.
- Cooper Flagg: Dallas’ leading scorer.
- Moussa Cisse: Dallas’ leading rebounder.
- Jericho Sims: Milwaukee’s leading rebounder.
- Brandon Williams: Dallas’ leading assist provider.
The best analysis combines these individual numbers with team efficiency.
Important Limitations of the Available Player Data
A trustworthy statistical analysis should also recognize what the supplied data does not include.
The provided information identifies several individual leaders, but it does not provide a complete player-by-player box score containing every player’s minutes, field-goal attempts, three-point attempts, free throws, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, turnovers, and plus/minus.
Because of that, it would be misleading to invent complete individual stat lines for players whose detailed numbers were not supplied.
The safest approach is to report the confirmed individual leaders and use the complete team statistics to explain the game.
That distinction matters for anyone using this article as a reference. Accuracy is more valuable than filling gaps with unsupported numbers.
Final Assessment
The April 1, 2026 meeting between the Dallas Mavericks and Milwaukee Bucks was defined by Milwaukee’s efficiency and consistency.
The Bucks scored 123 points and defeated Dallas 99-123. They won every quarter, shot 45% from the field, made 20 three-pointers, collected 59 rebounds, and recorded 28 assists.
Ryan Rollins was the standout individual performer, finishing with 24 points, 9 assists, and a +33 plus/minus. Jericho Sims led Milwaukee in rebounds with 9.
Dallas had its own notable contributors. Cooper Flagg led the team with 19 points, Moussa Cisse collected 13 rebounds, and Brandon Williams recorded 4 assists.
The Mavericks also showed defensive activity with 12 steals and limited their turnovers to 14. However, the team’s 35% field-goal shooting and 28% three-point shooting prevented those strengths from becoming a serious threat to Milwaukee’s lead.
The biggest lesson from the game is that possession pressure alone was not enough for Dallas. Milwaukee was more efficient with its opportunities and created more successful offensive possessions through shooting and passing.
For readers examining the milwaukee bucks vs dallas mavericks match player stats, Ryan Rollins’ all-around performance is the most prominent individual storyline, while Milwaukee’s shooting efficiency, three-point production, rebounding, assists, and rim protection explain why the Bucks turned the matchup into a 24-point victory.
The game also completed Milwaukee’s 2-0 season-series sweep over Dallas, following the Bucks’ narrow 116-114 win in November.
Overall, the box score presents a consistent picture: Dallas had moments of defensive disruption, but Milwaukee controlled the game through more efficient scoring, stronger team passing, superior rebounding, and greater defensive impact around the basket.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was Milwaukee’s top scorer against Dallas?
Ryan Rollins was Milwaukee’s leading scorer with 24 points. He also recorded 9 assists and finished with a game-best plus/minus of +33.
Who led Dallas in scoring?
Cooper Flagg led the Dallas Mavericks with 19 points.
Who had the most rebounds in the game?
Moussa Cisse led all listed individual rebounders with 13 rebounds for Dallas. Milwaukee’s leading rebounder was Jericho Sims with 9.
What was the final score between the Bucks and Mavericks?
The Milwaukee Bucks defeated the Dallas Mavericks 123-99 on April 1, 2026, at Fiserv Forum.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
Milwaukee shot better from three-point range, making 20 of 54 attempts for 37%. Dallas made 10 of 36 attempts for 28%.
Did Milwaukee win the season series?
Yes. Milwaukee led the season series 2-0. The Bucks previously defeated Dallas 116-114 on November 11, 2025.
Conclusion
The milwaukee bucks vs dallas mavericks match player stats from April 1, 2026, show a game that was decided primarily by efficiency and sustained execution.
Ryan Rollins delivered Milwaukee’s most complete listed individual performance with 24 points and 9 assists, while his +33 plus/minus highlighted his impact during Milwaukee’s dominant 123-99 victory. Cooper Flagg led Dallas with 19 points, and Moussa Cisse provided 13 rebounds.
The team statistics reinforce those individual performances. Milwaukee shot 45% from the field and 37% from three, compared with Dallas’ 35% and 28%. The Bucks also held advantages in rebounds, assists, and blocks while winning all four quarters.
Dallas did produce more steals and committed fewer turnovers, but those defensive advantages were not enough to offset Milwaukee’s superior shot-making and overall offensive organization.
The result was Milwaukee’s second victory over Dallas in the 2025-26 season series and a much more decisive outcome than the teams’ previous two-point meeting.
The most reliable way to understand this matchup is therefore not to focus only on the 24-point final margin. The underlying numbers explain it clearly: Milwaukee created more efficient scoring opportunities, converted them at a higher rate, moved the ball more effectively, controlled the glass, and provided stronger rim protection.
