Utah Jazz vs Oklahoma City Thunder Match Player Stats
The utah jazz vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats from April 6, 2026, tell a much bigger story than the final score alone. Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the Utah Jazz 146-111 at Paycom Center, turning the game into a decisive display of shooting efficiency, ball movement, rim protection, and overall offensive execution. The Thunder finished with 54 made field goals on 92 attempts, including 24 three-pointers, while Utah made 43 of 100 shots and connected on 14 of 39 attempts from beyond the arc. Individually, Brice Sensabaugh led Utah with 34 points, while Chet Holmgren paced Oklahoma City with 21 points and four blocks. Kyle Filipowski also produced an important all-around line for Utah with 14 rebounds and six assists. This breakdown goes beyond the headline score to explain what the player statistics reveal about how the game was actually won.
Utah Jazz vs Oklahoma City Thunder Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The April 6 meeting was played at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City, with an announced attendance of 18,203. The Thunder entered the contest with a 62-16 record and a 34-7 home mark, while Utah came in at 21-58 and 8-31 on the road.
Those records already established a major difference between the teams, but the performance on the court made that gap even clearer.
Oklahoma City scored 40 points in the first quarter and never allowed Utah to establish control. The Thunder followed that opening period with 35 points in the second, 33 in the third, and 38 in the fourth.
Utah’s quarter totals were 25, 29, 27, and 30.
Final Score
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Utah Jazz | 25 | 29 | 27 | 30 | 111 |
| Oklahoma City Thunder | 40 | 35 | 33 | 38 | 146 |
The 35-point margin was not created by one isolated run. Oklahoma City maintained its advantage throughout the game.
That consistency is important when evaluating player statistics. A player can produce impressive individual numbers during a blowout, but the broader team data often explains whether those numbers came within a competitive game or during extended garbage-time possessions.
Here, the team statistics strongly favor Oklahoma City.
How the Game Was Won
The clearest explanation comes from efficiency.
Utah shot 43% from the field, 36% from three-point range, and 73% at the free-throw line.
Oklahoma City shot 59% from the field, 53% from three, and 88% from the free-throw line.
That combination created an enormous offensive advantage.
The Thunder also recorded 40 assists compared with Utah’s 29. Oklahoma City had 46 rebounds to Utah’s 43 and committed 15 turnovers compared with Utah’s 16.
The turnover difference was relatively small, which is revealing.
Utah did not lose because it simply gave the ball away repeatedly. Instead, Oklahoma City generated a huge advantage by converting its possessions into efficient shots.
Shooting Efficiency Was the Biggest Difference
Oklahoma City attempted eight fewer field goals than Utah but made 11 more.
That is one of the most useful details in the entire statistical profile.
Utah attempted 100 field goals and made 43. Oklahoma City attempted 92 and made 54.
In other words, Oklahoma City produced more successful shots while taking fewer attempts.
The three-point difference was even more significant.
Utah made 14 of 39 three-point attempts. Oklahoma City made 24 of 45.
That means the Thunder made 10 more three-pointers while attempting only six more.
This is not simply a volume advantage. It is also an accuracy advantage.
At 53% from three, Oklahoma City’s perimeter shooting was exceptionally efficient. Utah’s 36% mark was respectable in isolation, but it could not compete with the Thunder’s combination of volume and accuracy.
Oklahoma City Thunder Player Performance
The individual statistics help explain why Oklahoma City was able to maintain such a large advantage.
Chet Holmgren
Chet Holmgren led Oklahoma City with 21 points and added four blocks.
His offensive total was not an enormous scoring number by NBA standards, but the importance of his performance cannot be measured by points alone.
The four blocks stand out.
Holmgren’s presence around the basket gave Oklahoma City another defensive layer while allowing the Thunder to maintain pressure elsewhere on the floor. His ability to influence shots without necessarily recording a block on every possession is also important when evaluating a rim protector.
The combination of 21 points and four blocks made Holmgren one of the most influential two-way players in the matchup.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 20 points and recorded seven assists.
His scoring total was slightly below Holmgren’s 21, but his playmaking role was particularly important.
Seven assists contributed to Oklahoma City’s 40-assist team total. That figure demonstrates that the Thunder’s offensive success was not dependent on one scorer repeatedly creating shots in isolation.
Gilgeous-Alexander’s contribution fits the larger pattern of the game: Oklahoma City consistently created efficient scoring opportunities through multiple players.
Jalen Williams
Jalen Williams scored 20 points and matched Gilgeous-Alexander with seven assists.
He also produced the best player plus/minus in the game at +31.
Plus/minus should never be treated as a complete evaluation of an individual performance, especially in a large-margin victory. However, a +31 mark in a 35-point win is still useful context.
Williams was on the floor during a significant portion of Oklahoma City’s strongest stretches, and his combination of scoring and playmaking helped maintain the Thunder’s offensive flow.
The seven assists are especially meaningful because they show that his value extended beyond scoring.
Isaiah Hartenstein
Isaiah Hartenstein led Oklahoma City in rebounding with eight.
His total may appear modest compared with some traditional big-man performances, but Oklahoma City did not need one player to dominate the glass.
The Thunder collected 46 rebounds as a team, only three more than Utah’s 43.
That tells us something important about the game.
Oklahoma City’s advantage did not primarily come from overwhelming Utah on the boards. Instead, the major separation came through shooting and offensive execution.
Hartenstein’s eight rebounds nevertheless helped the Thunder control possessions and limit Utah’s ability to create extra opportunities.
Jaylin Williams
Jaylin Williams finished as one of Oklahoma City’s leaders in steals with two.
The Thunder’s eight total steals were not an overwhelming number, but they contributed to a defensive performance that prevented Utah from finding consistent offensive rhythm.
His defensive activity also fits into Oklahoma City’s larger team approach, where several players contributed rather than relying entirely on one defensive specialist.
Utah Jazz Player Performance
Utah’s statistics were more competitive on an individual level than the final score might suggest.
The clearest example was Brice Sensabaugh.
Brice Sensabaugh
Brice Sensabaugh was Utah’s leading scorer with 34 points.
That was easily the highest individual scoring total for either team.
His performance deserves attention because it demonstrates an important distinction between individual production and team success.
Sensabaugh scored nearly one-third of Utah’s total points. Despite that offensive output, Utah still lost by 35 points.
That does not diminish his performance. Instead, it shows how difficult it is for one high-scoring player to compensate for a major team-wide efficiency gap.
When evaluating this game, Sensabaugh’s 34 points should therefore be viewed in two ways.
First, it was an impressive scoring contribution.
Second, the game demonstrated that Utah needed more efficient production from the rest of the lineup to challenge Oklahoma City.
Kyle Filipowski
Kyle Filipowski delivered Utah’s most complete statistical performance.
He led the Jazz with 14 rebounds and six assists.
Those numbers are particularly interesting because they show how much more he contributed than simply scoring.
Fourteen rebounds gave Utah a strong individual presence on the glass. Six assists also made him an important connector within the offense.
In a game where Utah scored 111 points, Filipowski’s ability to rebound and distribute was valuable.
His performance also illustrates why box-score analysis should not focus exclusively on points. A player can influence a game through possessions, second chances, passing, defensive positioning, and overall involvement.
Cody Williams
Cody Williams led Utah with three steals.
Utah recorded 11 steals as a team, giving the Jazz a respectable defensive activity number despite the final margin.
The fact that Utah actually finished with more steals than Oklahoma City is another reason the game cannot be explained simply by defensive effort.
The Thunder were more effective because they converted their offensive opportunities at a dramatically higher rate.
Ace Bailey
Ace Bailey recorded two blocks, giving Utah a presence as a shot blocker.
However, Bailey also finished with the lowest player plus/minus in the matchup at -47.
As with Williams’ +31, plus/minus needs context. A single-game plus/minus does not isolate individual performance from lineups, opponent combinations, shooting variance, or game situation.
Still, the -47 figure provides useful information about the stretches in which Utah struggled most severely while he was on the court.
It should be interpreted as a contextual statistic rather than a standalone judgment.
Utah Jazz vs Oklahoma City Thunder Match Player Stats: Key Numbers
The utah jazz vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats become easier to understand when the main numbers are placed side by side.
| Category | Utah Jazz | Oklahoma City Thunder |
| Points | 111 | 146 |
| Field Goals | 43-100 | 54-92 |
| Field Goal % | 43% | 59% |
| Three-Pointers | 14-39 | 24-45 |
| Three-Point % | 36% | 53% |
| Free Throws | 11-15 | 14-16 |
| Free Throw % | 73% | 88% |
| Rebounds | 43 | 46 |
| Assists | 29 | 40 |
| Turnovers | 16 | 15 |
| Steals | 11 | 8 |
| Blocks | 3 | 8 |
Several conclusions immediately stand out.
Oklahoma City had the better field-goal percentage, three-point percentage, free-throw percentage, assist total, and block total.
Utah had more steals and was only three rebounds behind the Thunder.
Turnovers were nearly even.
That makes shooting efficiency and playmaking the clearest explanations for the final result.
Why the 35-Point Margin Was So Large
A 35-point defeat can sometimes be caused by one catastrophic quarter.
That was not the case here.
Oklahoma City won every quarter.
The first quarter created the initial separation, with the Thunder scoring 40 points against Utah’s 25.
That 15-point opening advantage immediately changed the game.
Oklahoma City then added another six points to its lead in the second quarter.
At halftime, the Thunder had established a substantial cushion.
Instead of slowing down, Oklahoma City continued to score efficiently in the second half.
The Thunder scored 33 points in the third and 38 in the fourth.
Utah did score 30 in the final quarter, but Oklahoma City’s 38-point output ensured there was no meaningful comeback opportunity.
This is an important analytical point.
The Thunder did not merely survive Utah’s best effort. They repeatedly extended the advantage.
The Importance of 40 Assists
One of the most impressive numbers in the game was Oklahoma City’s 40 assists.
That total represents a high level of offensive connectivity.
With 54 made field goals, the Thunder assisted on a large majority of their successful baskets.
The precise assisted-field-goal percentage cannot be assumed from the supplied data alone because the relationship between individual assists and made baskets requires official possession-level context. However, 40 team assists on 54 made field goals clearly indicate extensive ball movement.
Utah recorded 29 assists on 43 made field goals.
That is also a healthy number.
The difference was not that Utah failed to pass the ball.
The difference was that Oklahoma City combined its passing with far greater shooting efficiency.
That combination is difficult for any opponent to overcome.
Three-Point Shooting Changed the Matchup
Three-point shooting was arguably the most visible statistical separator.
Utah made 14 three-pointers.
Oklahoma City made 24.
Those 10 additional three-pointers alone account for 30 points of scoring difference.
The final margin was 35 points.
That does not mean the entire game can be reduced to three-point shooting, because field-goal efficiency, free throws, two-point scoring, assists, and defensive plays also mattered.
However, the perimeter gap was enormous.
Oklahoma City’s 24 made threes gave the Thunder an offensive ceiling Utah could not match.
The 53% three-point percentage is especially significant because it means Oklahoma City was not merely taking a large number of low-quality attempts.
The Thunder were converting at an exceptional rate.
Rebounding Was Not the Main Problem for Utah
A common mistake when analyzing a large defeat is to assume the losing team was dominated on the boards.
That is not what happened here.
Utah recorded 43 rebounds.
Oklahoma City recorded 46.
A three-rebound difference is not enough to explain a 35-point defeat.
Utah also had the game’s leading individual rebounder in Filipowski, who collected 14.
Therefore, the Jazz’s primary problem was not a failure to compete physically for rebounds.
The bigger issue was what happened after possessions developed.
Oklahoma City turned its opportunities into points at a much higher rate.
Turnovers Tell an Interesting Story
Utah committed 16 turnovers.
Oklahoma City committed 15.
That is almost an even matchup.
If the game had featured a huge turnover disparity, it would be easy to attribute much of the margin to live-ball turnovers and transition opportunities.
But that explanation does not fit the supplied statistics.
Instead, the data points toward execution.
Oklahoma City simply shot the ball better, moved it more effectively, and protected its possessions slightly better.
The Thunder’s advantage was therefore more about quality than quantity.
Defensive Impact Beyond Steals
Utah finished with 11 steals compared with Oklahoma City’s eight.
At first glance, that might suggest Utah generated more defensive disruption.
But Oklahoma City had eight blocks compared with Utah’s three.
Holmgren alone recorded four blocks.
The overall defensive picture is therefore more balanced than the steals category suggests.
Steals can create immediate turnovers, while blocks can alter shot selection and discourage attempts around the basket.
A defense can also be effective without producing a large number of either statistic.
The 146-111 final score indicates that Oklahoma City’s defense was good enough to support its elite offense, while Utah could not slow the Thunder’s scoring pace.
Plus/Minus: What +31 and -47 Really Mean
The largest player plus/minus belonged to Jalen Williams at +31.
The lowest was Ace Bailey at -47.
These numbers deserve careful interpretation.
Plus/minus measures the team’s scoring margin while a player is on the court. It does not directly measure how many points that player personally scored, how many assists they created, or how well they defended.
For that reason, plus/minus should be combined with other statistics.
Williams’ +31 fits naturally with his 20 points and seven assists. His overall statistical profile supports the idea that he was involved in one of Oklahoma City’s strongest performances.
Bailey’s -47, however, should not automatically be interpreted as saying he was 47 points worse than another individual player.
The number reflects lineup performance during his minutes.
That distinction is important for anyone using these statistics for fantasy analysis, player evaluation, or historical comparisons.
Season Series: Oklahoma City Dominated All Four Meetings
The matchup was particularly one-sided across the season.
Oklahoma City won the season series 4-0.
The four results were:
- Oklahoma City 144, Utah 112
- Oklahoma City 131, Utah 101
- Oklahoma City 129, Utah 125 in overtime
- Oklahoma City 146, Utah 111
The fourth meeting was therefore not an isolated result.
Oklahoma City consistently found ways to beat Utah.
The third game was much more competitive, with the Thunder winning by four points in overtime. That result shows that the matchup was not always decided by enormous margins.
However, the overall series still strongly favored Oklahoma City.
Across the four meetings, the Thunder repeatedly demonstrated superior offensive output.
What the Season Series Says About Team Quality
A four-game sweep provides useful context, but it should not be interpreted as proof that every individual matchup was identical.
Basketball games are affected by injuries, rotations, shooting variance, game location, rest, and lineup combinations.
Still, winning all four meetings indicates that Oklahoma City consistently solved Utah’s defensive and offensive challenges.
The April 6 game was arguably the most decisive example.
The Thunder scored 146 points while shooting 59% from the field and 53% from three.
Those numbers explain why Utah had so little opportunity to remain competitive.
Comparing the Team Leaders
| Statistical Area | Utah Jazz | Oklahoma City Thunder |
| Leading Scorer | Brice Sensabaugh, 34 points | Chet Holmgren, 21 points |
| Leading Rebounder | Kyle Filipowski, 14 rebounds | Isaiah Hartenstein, 8 rebounds |
| Leading Assist Producer | Kyle Filipowski, 6 assists | Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Jalen Williams, 7 assists |
| Steals Leader | Cody Williams, 3 steals | Jaylin Williams and Jalen Williams, 2 each |
| Blocks Leader | Ace Bailey, 2 blocks | Chet Holmgren, 4 blocks |
| Best Plus/Minus | Not provided as positive leader | Jalen Williams, +31 |
| Lowest Plus/Minus | Ace Bailey, -47 | Not provided |
This comparison highlights the different ways the teams generated production.
Utah relied heavily on Sensabaugh’s scoring and Filipowski’s all-around contribution.
Oklahoma City spread its production across several players.
That balance was particularly important because the Thunder did not need a single player to score 30 or more points.
Why Brice Sensabaugh’s 34 Points Did Not Change the Result
Thirty-four points normally represent an outstanding scoring performance.
Sensabaugh reached that mark while Utah scored 111 points.
Yet the Jazz still lost by 35.
This illustrates one of the most important lessons from the game: individual scoring volume does not automatically translate into team success.
Basketball is a possession-based sport.
One player can score efficiently, but the team still needs stops, rebounds, secondary scoring, passing, and efficient production from the rest of the lineup.
Oklahoma City had enough collective production to neutralize Utah’s leading scorer.
That is why the final result cannot be understood by looking only at the top scorer.
Why Kyle Filipowski’s Line Matters
Filipowski’s 14 rebounds and six assists make his performance one of the most interesting parts of the Jazz box score.
He led Utah in two categories that often have a major impact on possession quality.
Rebounding creates additional opportunities and ends defensive possessions.
Assists help create scoring chances for teammates.
Despite that contribution, Utah could not keep pace with Oklahoma City’s shooting.
This is another reason the game is useful for statistical analysis.
It demonstrates that strong individual contributions can coexist with a poor team result when the opponent is substantially more efficient.
What Oklahoma City’s 64-18 Final Record Shows
The supplied data lists Oklahoma City’s final regular-season record as 64-18, good for a .780 winning percentage.
Utah finished at 22-60, with a .268 winning percentage.
The April 6 matchup occurred shortly before the conclusion of the regular season, with Oklahoma City entering at 62-16 and Utah at 21-58.
The records provide broader context for the game.
Oklahoma City was operating at a championship-level regular-season pace, while Utah was near the bottom of the standings.
That does not make the April 6 result automatic, but it helps explain why the Thunder entered with such a significant statistical and competitive advantage.
A Deeper Reading of the Box Score
The most useful way to analyze the utah jazz vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats is to separate the game into four categories.
1. Shot Creation
Oklahoma City produced 54 made field goals compared with Utah’s 43.
That is a substantial difference.
2. Shot Quality and Accuracy
The Thunder shot 59% overall and 53% from three.
Utah shot 43% overall and 36% from three.
The accuracy gap was enormous.
3. Ball Movement
Oklahoma City recorded 40 assists.
Utah recorded 29.
Both teams moved the ball, but Oklahoma City generated more successful scoring plays from that movement.
4. Defensive Finishing
Oklahoma City recorded eight blocks.
Utah recorded three.
Holmgren’s four blocks were especially important in this category.
Together, these four elements explain the game far better than the final score alone.
Statistical Lessons for Future Matchups
If these teams were to meet again, several statistical areas would deserve close attention.
Utah Would Need to Improve Perimeter Defense
Allowing 24 made three-pointers is difficult to overcome.
Even if Oklahoma City does not repeat a 53% three-point performance, Utah would need to reduce the number of clean perimeter opportunities.
Utah Would Need More Balanced Scoring
Sensabaugh’s 34 points were impressive, but the team needed greater support.
A more balanced scoring distribution could make Utah less predictable and reduce the burden on its primary scorer.
Oklahoma City Would Need to Maintain Ball Movement
The Thunder’s 40 assists were a major strength.
Maintaining that level of offensive connectivity would make it difficult for opponents to focus on one creator.
Utah Could Build Around Filipowski’s Versatility
Filipowski’s 14 rebounds and six assists suggest that his value extends across several areas.
Using that versatility effectively can create more options for the Jazz offense while strengthening their rebounding structure.
Who Was the Most Important Player?
If the question is about pure scoring, Sensabaugh deserves the headline because he scored 34 points.
If the question is about two-way impact, Holmgren has a strong case because he combined 21 points with four blocks.
If the question is about all-around team influence, Jalen Williams stands out because of his 20 points, seven assists, two steals, and +31 plus/minus.
And if the focus is Utah’s most complete statistical contribution, Filipowski’s 14 rebounds and six assists make him a clear choice.
That is why there is no single answer without defining what “most important” means.
Different statistics measure different forms of impact.
Player Performance Summary
Utah Jazz
Brice Sensabaugh: 34 points, leading Utah scorer.
Kyle Filipowski: 14 rebounds and six assists, leading Utah in both categories.
Cody Williams: Three steals, the Jazz team high.
Ace Bailey: Two blocks and a game-low -47 plus/minus.
The Jazz’s individual leaders showed that the team had meaningful contributions in scoring, rebounding, passing, steals, and blocks. The problem was putting those contributions together efficiently enough to withstand Oklahoma City’s offensive output.
Oklahoma City Thunder
Chet Holmgren: 21 points and four blocks, leading the Thunder in scoring and blocks.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander: 20 points and seven assists.
Jalen Williams: 20 points, seven assists, two steals, and a game-high +31 plus/minus.
Isaiah Hartenstein: Eight rebounds, the Thunder’s leading total.
Jaylin Williams: Two steals.
The Thunder’s production was distributed more evenly, which helped create a balanced offensive attack.
Final Statistical Verdict
The April 6, 2026 matchup was a decisive Oklahoma City victory because the Thunder combined elite shooting with superior ball movement and strong defensive activity.
The final 146-111 score tells the basic story.
The statistics explain it.
Oklahoma City shot 59% from the field, 53% from three, and 88% from the free-throw line.
Utah shot 43% from the field, 36% from three, and 73% from the free-throw line.
Oklahoma City also recorded 40 assists to Utah’s 29.
The rebounding margin was small, and the turnover difference was only one. That makes the shooting and offensive execution gap even more significant.
Sensabaugh’s 34 points were the biggest individual scoring performance of the game, but Holmgren’s 21 points and four blocks, Gilgeous-Alexander’s 20 points and seven assists, and Williams’ 20 points, seven assists, and +31 plus/minus illustrated the depth of Oklahoma City’s performance.
The season series reinforced the same conclusion.
Oklahoma City won all four meetings, including the April 6 game by 35 points.
For anyone studying the utah jazz vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats, the biggest lesson is that the matchup was not decided by one category. Oklahoma City’s advantage came from several connected factors: efficient shooting, high-volume three-point production, strong passing, defensive rim protection, and balanced individual contributions.
Utah had legitimate individual performances, especially from Sensabaugh and Filipowski, but Oklahoma City’s collective efficiency proved too much to overcome.
FAQs
Who led the Utah Jazz in scoring against Oklahoma City?
Brice Sensabaugh led the Utah Jazz with 34 points.
Who led the Oklahoma City Thunder in scoring?
Chet Holmgren led Oklahoma City with 21 points, while Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Jalen Williams each scored 20.
Who had the most rebounds in the game?
Kyle Filipowski led all players with 14 rebounds. Isaiah Hartenstein led Oklahoma City with eight rebounds.
Who had the most assists?
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Jalen Williams each recorded seven assists for Oklahoma City. Kyle Filipowski led Utah with six.
What was the final score?
Oklahoma City defeated Utah 146-111 on April 6, 2026, at Paycom Center.
Did Oklahoma City sweep the season series?
Yes. Oklahoma City won all four meetings against Utah during the season, completing a 4-0 season-series sweep.
Conclusion
The utah jazz vs oklahoma city thunder match player stats provide a clear picture of why Oklahoma City controlled the April 6 matchup from start to finish.
Utah received an outstanding 34-point scoring performance from Brice Sensabaugh and an all-around contribution from Kyle Filipowski, who recorded 14 rebounds and six assists. Cody Williams added three steals, while Ace Bailey recorded two blocks.
Oklahoma City responded with balanced production. Chet Holmgren led the Thunder with 21 points and four blocks. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Jalen Williams each scored 20 points and supplied seven assists. Jalen Williams also finished with the game’s best plus/minus at +31.
The most important difference, however, was team efficiency.
The Thunder made 54 of 92 field-goal attempts and 24 of 45 three-point attempts. Utah made 43 of 100 field goals and 14 of 39 threes. Oklahoma City’s 40 assists also demonstrated the effectiveness of its offensive movement.
The 146-111 result was therefore a product of sustained execution rather than one isolated statistical advantage.
The season series tells the same story. Oklahoma City won all four meetings, and the April 6 victory was the most decisive of the four.
For readers studying individual performances, team trends, or the broader meaning behind a basketball box score, this matchup is a useful example of why points alone do not tell the entire story. Shooting efficiency, playmaking, rebounding, defensive activity, and lineup impact all have to be considered together.
