Atlanta Dream vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats
The atlanta dream vs indiana fever match player stats from the WNBA Commissioner’s Cup matchup on June 5, 2026, tell the story of a game that was decided by efficiency, perimeter shooting, and star level performances. Indiana Fever secured an impressive 83 to 71 victory over Atlanta Dream at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis in front of 17,002 fans. While the final score suggests a comfortable win, the game featured several momentum swings and standout individual efforts that deserve a closer look.
For fans, analysts, and fantasy basketball followers, understanding the atlanta dream vs indiana fever match player stats goes beyond simply looking at points scored. The numbers reveal how Indiana’s balanced offense, superior shooting percentages, and defensive presence helped overcome a competitive Atlanta squad that entered the contest with a stronger overall record.
This detailed breakdown examines player performances, team statistics, quarter by quarter trends, tactical observations, and what the result means for both franchises moving forward in the 2026 WNBA season.
Match Overview
| Match Detail | Information |
| Competition | WNBA Commissioner’s Cup |
| Date | June 5, 2026 |
| Venue | Gainbridge Fieldhouse, Indianapolis |
| Attendance | 17,002 |
| Final Score | Indiana Fever 83, Atlanta Dream 71 |
| Winner | Indiana Fever |
| Atlanta Record | 6 to 3 |
| Indiana Record | 5 to 4 |
The game was closely contested in the opening quarter before Indiana gradually took control. Strong shooting from Kelsey Mitchell, all around production from Caitlin Clark, and interior dominance from Aliyah Boston gave the Fever enough firepower to secure the victory.
Quarter by Quarter Breakdown
First Quarter
| Team | Points |
| Atlanta Dream | 15 |
| Indiana Fever | 15 |
Both teams started cautiously. Defensive pressure limited easy scoring opportunities, resulting in a tied quarter. Atlanta’s defense successfully disrupted Indiana’s early rhythm, while Indiana prevented the Dream from generating transition opportunities.
Second Quarter
| Team | Points |
| Atlanta Dream | 14 |
| Indiana Fever | 23 |
This was the decisive stretch of the game. Indiana outscored Atlanta by nine points and established momentum that carried throughout the remainder of the contest.
Kelsey Mitchell’s scoring surge and improved ball movement helped Indiana create high quality looks from both inside and beyond the arc.
Third Quarter
| Team | Points |
| Atlanta Dream | 22 |
| Indiana Fever | 24 |
Atlanta attempted a comeback behind contributions from Allisha Gray and Angel Reese. However, every Dream run was answered by Indiana’s offensive execution.
Fourth Quarter
| Team | Points |
| Atlanta Dream | 20 |
| Indiana Fever | 21 |
The final period remained competitive, but Indiana never allowed Atlanta to significantly reduce the deficit. Efficient late game possessions secured the victory.
Final Team Statistics Comparison
One of the most important aspects of the atlanta dream vs indiana fever match player stats is how clearly the team numbers explain the outcome.
| Statistical Category | Atlanta Dream | Indiana Fever |
| Field Goals | 23 of 67 | |
| Field Goal Percentage | 34% | 48% |
| Three Pointers | 6 of 21 | 11 of 25 |
| Three Point Percentage | 29% | 44% |
| Free Throws | 19 of 24 | 12 of 15 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 79% | 80% |
| Rebounds | 30 | 35 |
| Assists | 14 | 16 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 14 |
| Steals | 9 | 6 |
| Blocks | 3 | 7 |
| Fouls | 19 | 22 |
Key Difference Makers
Several statistical advantages helped Indiana secure the win:
- Better field goal efficiency
- More made three pointers
- Stronger rebounding presence
- Greater rim protection
- More balanced scoring distribution
While Atlanta committed fewer turnovers and generated more steals, those advantages were outweighed by Indiana’s superior shooting performance.
Indiana Fever Player Stats and Performance Analysis
Indiana’s victory was fueled by three standout performers who combined for 61 points.
Kelsey Mitchell Leads All Scorers
| Stat | Total |
| Points | 25 |
| Field Goals | 11 of 15 |
Kelsey Mitchell delivered one of her most efficient performances of the season.
Scoring 25 points on just 15 field goal attempts is elite production at any level of basketball. Her ability to create offense from multiple spots on the floor prevented Atlanta from focusing defensive attention on a single player.
What stood out most was her shot selection. Rather than forcing difficult attempts, Mitchell consistently attacked favorable matchups and converted opportunities at a remarkable rate.
Caitlin Clark’s Complete Floor Game
| Stat | Total |
| Points | 17 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
| Assists | 8 |
Caitlin Clark once again demonstrated why she remains one of the most influential players in the league.
Although her scoring was important, her eight assists arguably had an even greater impact. Clark’s court vision created open opportunities throughout the game, helping Indiana maintain offensive flow.
Her seven rebounds also highlight her ability to contribute beyond scoring and playmaking.
Aliyah Boston Controls the Interior
| Stat | Total |
| Points | 19 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
| Blocks | 3 |
Aliyah Boston delivered an outstanding two way performance.
Her 19 points provided consistent interior scoring, while her defensive presence altered numerous Atlanta possessions. Three blocks only tell part of the story, as Boston’s positioning discouraged drives into the paint throughout the game.
Bench Contributions
Sophie Cunningham
| Stat | Total |
| Points | 8 |
Cunningham supplied valuable scoring from the bench, helping maintain offensive pressure when starters rested.
Raven Johnson
| Stat | Total |
| Points | 5 |
| Assists | 3 |
Johnson contributed important secondary playmaking minutes and helped stabilize the offense.
Atlanta Dream Player Stats and Performance Analysis
Although Atlanta fell short, several players produced notable performances.
Allisha Gray Leads the Team
| Stat | Total |
| Points | 13 |
| Rebounds | 1 |
| Assists | 2 |
Allisha Gray finished as Atlanta’s leading scorer with 13 points.
While her scoring output led the team, Indiana’s defensive strategy successfully prevented any Dream player from reaching the 20 point mark.
Jordin Canada Facilitates the Offense
| Stat | Total |
| Points | 13 |
| Rebounds | 3 |
| Assists | 7 |
Canada was Atlanta’s primary creator.
Her seven assists generated numerous scoring opportunities, and she consistently pushed the pace whenever transition chances emerged.
Angel Reese Records a Double Double
| Stat | Total |
| Points | 11 |
| Rebounds | 10 |
| Assists | 3 |
Angel Reese continued her reputation as one of the league’s premier rebounders.
Recording a double double against a talented Indiana frontcourt demonstrates her ability to impact games even when offensive opportunities are limited.
Naz Hillmon’s Efficient Production
| Stat | Total |
| Points | 12 |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 1 |
Hillmon provided valuable support and remained one of Atlanta’s most reliable contributors during key stretches.
Rhyne Howard’s Quiet Night
| Stat | Total |
| Points | 8 |
| Rebounds | 4 |
Indiana deserves significant credit for limiting Howard’s offensive impact. Holding one of Atlanta’s premier scorers to eight points played a major role in the outcome.
Complete Starting Lineup Statistics
Atlanta Dream Starters
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Naz Hillmon | 12 | 5 | 1 |
| Angel Reese | 11 | 10 | 3 |
| Allisha Gray | 13 | 1 | 2 |
| Jordin Canada | 13 | 3 | 7 |
| Rhyne Howard | 8 | 4 | 0 |
Indiana Fever Starters
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Monique Billings | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Aliyah Boston | 19 | 7 | N/A |
| Kelsey Mitchell | 25 | N/A | N/A |
| Lexie Hull | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Caitlin Clark | 17 | 7 | 8 |
Why Indiana Fever Won
Looking deeper into the atlanta dream vs indiana fever match player stats, several factors explain Indiana’s success.
Superior Shooting Efficiency
The Fever shot 48 percent from the field compared to Atlanta’s 34 percent.
That difference translated into significantly more made baskets despite similar offensive opportunities.
Three Point Advantage
Indiana connected on 11 three pointers while Atlanta made only six.
The additional 15 points generated from long range shooting proved crucial.
Interior Defense
Seven team blocks highlight Indiana’s rim protection.
Aliyah Boston and the Fever frontcourt consistently challenged Atlanta’s attempts around the basket.
Balanced Offensive Attack
Indiana had three players score at least 17 points.
Atlanta lacked a comparable scoring distribution, making it easier for Indiana to focus defensively.
Tactical Takeaways
What Worked for Indiana
- Ball movement created open shots.
- Efficient perimeter shooting stretched Atlanta’s defense.
- Interior protection discouraged drives.
- Balanced scoring reduced pressure on individual players.
What Atlanta Must Improve
- Increase shooting efficiency.
- Generate more perimeter scoring.
- Improve offensive spacing.
- Find additional scoring support for key contributors.
Season Series Update
The rivalry between these teams has been highly competitive throughout 2026.
| Game | Result |
| Game 1 | Indiana Fever 83, Atlanta Dream 71 |
| Game 2 | Atlanta Dream 108, Indiana Fever 101 |
| Game 3 | Atlanta Dream 113, Indiana Fever 96 |
Despite Indiana winning this Commissioner’s Cup matchup, Atlanta still holds a 2 to 1 advantage in the overall season series.
The next meeting is scheduled for August 17, 2026, in Atlanta.
Historical Importance of This Matchup
The growing competitiveness between Indiana and Atlanta reflects broader trends across the WNBA.
Young stars, improved team depth, and increased fan engagement continue to elevate the quality of competition throughout the league. According to the official WNBA, attendance and national interest have reached unprecedented levels in recent seasons. Visit the official WNBA website for league information, schedules, and statistical resources.
This game served as another example of how closely matched these franchises have become.
Advanced Insights From the Numbers
When reviewing game statistics professionally, analysts often focus on indicators beyond raw scoring totals.
Several advanced observations stand out:
Shot Quality
Indiana’s higher field goal percentage suggests the Fever consistently generated better scoring opportunities.
Rebounding Margin
A five rebound advantage may seem small, but extra possessions often decide competitive games.
Defensive Impact
Seven blocks indicate Indiana influenced Atlanta’s shot selection throughout the contest.
Offensive Distribution
The Fever received major contributions from multiple players, making defensive adjustments difficult.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the leading scorer in the game?
Kelsey Mitchell led all players with 25 points for Indiana Fever.
Who recorded a double double?
Angel Reese recorded a double double with 11 points and 10 rebounds.
How many points did Caitlin Clark score?
Caitlin Clark finished with 17 points, seven rebounds, and eight assists.
What was the final score?
Indiana Fever defeated Atlanta Dream by a score of 83 to 71.
Which team shot better from three point range?
Indiana shot 44 percent from three point range, while Atlanta shot 29 percent.
When is the next Atlanta Dream versus Indiana Fever game?
The next scheduled matchup is August 17, 2026, in Atlanta.
Conclusion
The atlanta dream vs indiana fever match player stats reveal a game that was ultimately decided by efficiency and execution. Indiana Fever combined elite shooting, balanced scoring, strong rebounding, and impactful defense to earn an 83 to 71 victory in front of a packed home crowd.
Kelsey Mitchell’s 25 point performance provided the scoring spark, Caitlin Clark delivered another versatile all around game, and Aliyah Boston anchored both ends of the floor. For Atlanta, Angel Reese’s double double and solid contributions from Allisha Gray and Jordin Canada were not enough to overcome shooting struggles and Indiana’s defensive pressure.
As the season continues, this matchup remains one of the WNBA’s most intriguing rivalries. With Atlanta still holding a 2 to 1 edge in the season series and another meeting scheduled later in the year, fans can expect another highly competitive chapter when these teams face each other again.