76ers vs dallas mavericks match player stats

The 76ers vs dallas mavericks match player stats from January 2, 2026, tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. Philadelphia defeated Dallas 123-108 at American Airlines Center in Dallas, improving to 18-14 overall and 9-6 on the road, while the Mavericks dropped to 12-23 and 9-10 at home. The result also completed a 2-0 season sweep for Philadelphia, following the 76ers’ 121-114 victory over Dallas on December 21, 2025.

Tyrese Maxey was the central figure in Philadelphia’s victory. He finished with 34 points, 8 rebounds, and 10 assists, giving the 76ers an unusually complete individual performance. VJ Edgecombe added 23 points, Joel Embiid scored 22, and Paul George contributed 14. For Dallas, Max Christie led the team with 18 points, while Klay Thompson scored 14. Daniel Gafford had 8 points, and Naji Marshall and Brandon Williams each scored 9.

The numbers become especially interesting when the game is examined quarter by quarter. Dallas actually opened the contest better, scoring 33 points in the first quarter compared with Philadelphia’s 27. The 76ers then responded with a 41-point second quarter, turning the game around before maintaining control through the second half.

76ers vs dallas mavericks match player stats at a glance

Category	Philadelphia 76ers	Dallas Mavericks
Final Score	123	108
First Quarter	27	33
Second Quarter	41	24
Third Quarter	24	26
Fourth Quarter	31	25
Field Goals	48-90	42-94
Field Goal Percentage	53%	45%
Three-Pointers	13-36	6-28
Three-Point Percentage	36%	21%
Free Throws	14-16	18-20
Free Throw Percentage	88%	90%
Rebounds	43	39
Assists	22	23
Turnovers	11	13
Steals	10	8
Blocks	7	1

The basic statistical comparison immediately explains why Philadelphia won despite Dallas having a slight edge in assists and a higher free throw percentage.

Philadelphia made six more field goals while attempting four fewer shots. The 76ers also made seven more three-pointers and shot 36% from beyond the arc compared with Dallas at 21%. That shooting efficiency difference was one of the clearest separators in the game.

Tyrese Maxey was the difference maker

Among the 76ers vs dallas mavericks match player stats, Tyrese Maxey’s line stands out immediately.

Maxey scored 34 points, collected 8 rebounds, and delivered 10 assists. His 10 assists were the highest total listed for either team, and his 34 points were also the game’s highest individual scoring output.

What makes the performance especially valuable is the combination of scoring and playmaking. A player can dominate a box score through scoring alone, but Maxey affected Philadelphia’s offense in multiple ways.

His numbers indicate three major contributions:

1. Scoring pressure: 34 points gave Philadelphia a reliable primary scoring source.
2. Playmaking: 10 assists helped create opportunities for teammates.
3. Rebounding: 8 rebounds added value outside the backcourt.

That combination helped Philadelphia avoid becoming too dependent on one type of offense.

The 76ers scored 123 points overall, and Maxey’s 34 represented a substantial portion of that total. At the same time, his 10 assists show that his influence was not limited to his own shot attempts.

From a game-analysis perspective, this is one of the strongest lessons from the matchup. Individual statistics should not always be evaluated separately. A high-scoring guard who also creates shots for teammates can influence both his own production and the efficiency of the players around him.

Philadelphia’s other leading performers

Maxey was the statistical leader, but Philadelphia did not win because of one player alone.

VJ Edgecombe

VJ Edgecombe scored 23 points, making him Philadelphia’s second-highest scorer.

His production was important because it gave the 76ers another significant scoring option. When a team has multiple players producing at a high level, opposing defenses have fewer opportunities to concentrate their attention on the primary offensive threat.

Edgecombe’s 23 points combined with Maxey’s 34 and Embiid’s 22 meant that three Philadelphia players accounted for a large share of the team’s scoring.

Joel Embiid

Joel Embiid finished with 22 points.

His scoring total placed him third among Philadelphia’s listed leading scorers, but his presence as a starter remained important to the team’s overall offensive structure. Philadelphia’s starting lineup also included Paul George, Dominick Barlow, Maxey, and Edgecombe.

The 22 points from Embiid helped Philadelphia maintain offensive balance. Instead of requiring Maxey to carry the scoring burden alone, the 76ers received substantial contributions from several players.

Paul George

Paul George scored 14 points.

Although 14 points were well below Maxey’s 34, the contribution still added another layer to Philadelphia’s offense. The 76ers’ four listed key scorers combined for 93 points, showing how effectively the team’s scoring was distributed among its leading contributors.

This balance matters when evaluating a box score. A 123-point team performance is easier to sustain when several players contribute meaningful scoring rather than relying almost entirely on one scorer.

Dallas Mavericks player statistics

The Dallas side of the 76ers vs dallas mavericks match player stats presents a different picture.

Max Christie led the Mavericks with 18 points. Klay Thompson followed with 14, while Daniel Gafford recorded 8 points. Naji Marshall and Brandon Williams each finished with 9 points.

Compared with Philadelphia, Dallas did not have a player reach 20 points.

That difference is significant when combined with the overall scoring totals. Philadelphia had three listed players at 22 points or more, while Dallas’ leading listed scorer finished at 18.

Max Christie

Christie led Dallas with 18 points.

His scoring output made him the Mavericks’ top scorer on the night, but the overall team total of 108 points shows that Dallas needed more production from its leading options to keep pace with Philadelphia’s 123.

Klay Thompson

Klay Thompson scored 14 points.

The veteran guard was listed among Dallas’ starters alongside Anthony Davis, P.J. Washington, Cooper Flagg, and Max Christie. His 14 points placed him second among the listed Dallas scorers.

Daniel Gafford

Daniel Gafford scored 8 points.

While his scoring contribution was smaller than Christie’s and Thompson’s, his role also needs to be viewed within the broader team statistics. Dallas recorded 39 rebounds and 23 assists, indicating that its overall performance was not simply a matter of scoring.

Why Philadelphia won the shooting battle

The most important team-level difference was shooting efficiency.

Philadelphia went 48-for-90 from the field, producing a listed field goal percentage of 53%. Dallas went 42-for-94, shooting 45%.

That means Philadelphia made more shots despite taking fewer attempts.

This is a particularly useful statistic for understanding the final result. Dallas attempted four more field goals, but Philadelphia converted six more. The difference was therefore not simply about shot volume. It was about converting opportunities more efficiently.

The three-point numbers were even more revealing.

Philadelphia made 13 of 36 three-point attempts, while Dallas made only 6 of 28.

That gave Philadelphia seven more made three-pointers.

Because every successful three-point shot is worth three points, that difference created a major scoring advantage. Philadelphia’s 13 made threes accounted for 39 points. Dallas’ six made threes accounted for 18 points.

The gap from three-point shooting alone was therefore substantial.

Free throw shooting was not the deciding factor

Dallas actually had the slightly better free throw percentage.

The Mavericks made 18 of 20 free throws for 90%, while Philadelphia made 14 of 16 for 88%.

Ordinarily, a 90% free throw percentage would be an excellent offensive efficiency marker. However, Dallas attempted only four more free throws and made four more.

The advantage from the free throw line was therefore not large enough to compensate for Philadelphia’s superior field goal and three-point production.

This is a useful reminder when reading basketball statistics. The highest percentage in a category does not necessarily mean that team controlled the game. Attempts, made shots, and the value of each scoring opportunity all matter.

Rebounding comparison

Philadelphia finished with 43 rebounds, while Dallas recorded 39.

The four-rebound advantage was meaningful, although it was not nearly as dramatic as the shooting difference.

Rebounding can influence a game in two major ways. Defensive rebounds can end an opponent’s possession, while offensive rebounds can create additional opportunities for the same team.

The available team data does not provide a full offensive and defensive rebound breakdown, so it would be inappropriate to assign the four-rebound difference to one specific area.

What can be established is that Philadelphia finished with a 43-39 overall rebounding advantage.

That helped the 76ers maintain a modest edge in possession opportunities while also limiting Dallas’ overall rebounding advantage.

Assists and ball movement

Dallas actually finished with one more assist than Philadelphia.

The Mavericks recorded 23 assists, compared with 22 for the 76ers.

That statistic is important because it demonstrates that Philadelphia’s victory was not simply caused by having more assists. Dallas moved the ball effectively enough to finish slightly ahead in this category.

Yet the final score still favored Philadelphia by 15 points.

The difference reinforces a broader point about basketball analysis: assists are valuable, but they do not exist in isolation. A team can have more assists and still lose if it converts fewer scoring opportunities.

Philadelphia’s 53% field goal shooting and 36% three-point shooting provided a more significant offensive advantage than the one-assist difference.

Turnovers gave Philadelphia another advantage

Philadelphia committed 11 turnovers, while Dallas committed 13.

The difference was only two turnovers, but it still favored the 76ers.

Turnovers matter because every lost possession can remove a scoring opportunity. They can also create transition opportunities for the opponent.

The available data does not provide the complete points-off-turnovers breakdown, so the safest conclusion is simply that Philadelphia protected the ball slightly better.

The combination of fewer turnovers, more rebounds, better field goal efficiency, and substantially better three-point shooting created a strong overall statistical profile.

Philadelphia’s defensive numbers were stronger

Philadelphia recorded 10 steals and 7 blocks.

Dallas recorded 8 steals and only 1 block.

The block difference is especially notable.

Philadelphia finished with seven times as many blocks as Dallas. That does not automatically prove that the 76ers controlled every aspect of interior defense, but it does demonstrate a clear difference in recorded shot-blocking production.

Steals also favored Philadelphia by two.

Together, the defensive numbers show that the 76ers generated more disruptive plays according to the supplied box score.

Quarter-by-quarter breakdown

The final score becomes much easier to understand when the four quarters are separated.

First quarter: Dallas starts strongly

Dallas scored 33 points in the opening quarter, compared with 27 from Philadelphia.

The Mavericks therefore led by six points after the first period.

This is an important part of the game’s story because Philadelphia did not dominate from the opening tip. Dallas established the better early scoring pace.

Second quarter: Philadelphia changes the game

The second quarter was the turning point.

Philadelphia scored 41 points, while Dallas managed 24.

That produced a 17-point swing in the quarter.

After trailing by six following the opening period, Philadelphia’s massive second-quarter advantage put the 76ers in a much stronger position entering halftime.

The second quarter is arguably the most important statistical segment of the game because Philadelphia generated its largest single-quarter scoring output while simultaneously holding Dallas to its lowest.

Third quarter: Dallas responds

Dallas scored 26 points in the third quarter, while Philadelphia scored 24.

The Mavericks therefore gained two points on Philadelphia during the period.

However, the improvement was not enough to erase the damage created during the second quarter.

Fourth quarter: Philadelphia closes the game

Philadelphia scored 31 points in the fourth quarter.

Dallas scored 25.

The 76ers therefore added another six points to their advantage during the final period.

A team that can recover from a poor opening quarter, create a major second-quarter advantage, and then close the game with a 31-point fourth quarter demonstrates strong scoring consistency across the latter stages of the contest.

How the 123-108 final score was built

Philadelphia’s final score of 123 points can be reconstructed directly from its quarter totals:

27 + 41 + 24 + 31 = 123.

Dallas’ total also matches its quarter-by-quarter scoring:

33 + 24 + 26 + 25 = 108.

The 15-point final margin therefore came from a combination of different phases rather than one dominant quarter alone.

Dallas won the first quarter by six.

Philadelphia won the second quarter by 17.

Dallas won the third quarter by two.

Philadelphia won the fourth quarter by six.

The second-quarter performance was the decisive swing.

This type of quarter analysis is more useful than simply stating that Philadelphia won by 15 because it explains when the game changed.

Comparing the teams through efficiency

The supplied shooting percentages offer a clear efficiency comparison.

Philadelphia:

• 53% field goal shooting
• 36% three-point shooting
• 88% free throw shooting

Dallas:

• 45% field goal shooting
• 21% three-point shooting
• 90% free throw shooting

Philadelphia led in field goal percentage and three-point percentage.

Dallas led only in free throw percentage.

The biggest gap was the three-point category, where Philadelphia’s 36% was 15 percentage points higher than Dallas’ 21%.

That difference provides one of the clearest statistical explanations for the 15-point victory.

The importance of the 13 made three-pointers

Philadelphia’s 13 made three-pointers deserve special attention.

Dallas made six.

The 76ers therefore connected on more than twice as many successful three-point shots.

This was not simply a difference in attempts. Philadelphia attempted 36 threes, while Dallas attempted 28. The 76ers took eight more attempts, but the larger story was how much more effectively they converted those attempts.

Philadelphia’s 13-for-36 performance produced a much stronger long-range scoring contribution than Dallas’ 6-for-28 line.

For anyone studying the 76ers vs dallas mavericks match player stats, this is one of the most important numbers to remember.

A closer look at team offensive balance

Philadelphia’s listed leading scorers were:

• Tyrese Maxey: 34 points
• VJ Edgecombe: 23 points
• Joel Embiid: 22 points
• Paul George: 14 points

These four players combined for 93 points.

That means the majority of Philadelphia’s 123 points came from four identified offensive contributors.

Dallas’ listed leading scorers were:

• Max Christie: 18 points
• Klay Thompson: 14 points
• Naji Marshall: 9 points
• Brandon Williams: 9 points
• Daniel Gafford: 8 points

These five players combined for 58 points.

The supplied data does not provide every individual Dallas scoring line, so the remaining points should not be assigned to unnamed players without evidence.

That distinction is important for trustworthy statistical reporting. A box score should be analyzed from what is actually available rather than filling missing details with assumptions.

Season series advantage for Philadelphia

The January 2 matchup was the second meeting between these teams during the season.

Philadelphia had already defeated Dallas 121-114 on December 21, 2025.

The January 2 result gave Philadelphia a 2-0 season-series advantage.

That means both meetings were won by Philadelphia, although the margins were different.

The first game ended with a seven-point Philadelphia victory.

The second ended with a 15-point victory.

The difference between the two results suggests that Philadelphia’s control over the season series became stronger in the second meeting.

Still, the two games should not be treated as identical. Different game conditions, lineups, shooting performances, and tactical choices can influence individual matchups.

What the records tell us

Philadelphia entered the game at 18-14 overall and 9-6 on the road.

Dallas entered at 12-23 overall and 9-10 at home.

Those records provide useful context.

Philadelphia had won 18 of its first 32 games, while Dallas had won 12 of its first 35.

The road and home records were closer than the overall records. Philadelphia was 9-6 away, while Dallas was 9-10 at home.

That suggests the matchup was not simply a case of an excellent road team facing an incapable home team. Both teams had meaningful wins in their respective location splits.

The final result therefore reflected what happened on January 2 rather than merely what the records predicted.

Starting lineups

Philadelphia’s listed starters were:

• Paul George
• Dominick Barlow
• Joel Embiid
• Tyrese Maxey
• VJ Edgecombe

Dallas’ listed starters were:

• Anthony Davis
• P.J. Washington
• Cooper Flagg
• Max Christie
• Ryan Nembhard

The starting lineups provide useful context for anyone comparing player roles.

Philadelphia had Maxey, Embiid, George, and Edgecombe among its starting group, while Dallas started Davis, Washington, Flagg, Christie, and Nembhard.

The available data identifies these players as starters but does not provide complete individual statistical lines for every starter. Therefore, the analysis should not assume statistics that were not supplied.

Why the box score should be read as a complete picture

One of the easiest mistakes when analyzing basketball is to focus on one impressive statistic.

Maxey’s 34 points are impressive, but the game was not won by scoring alone.

Philadelphia also:

• Shot 53% from the field.
• Made 13 three-pointers.
• Rebounded the ball 43 times.
• Recorded 10 steals.
• Recorded 7 blocks.
• Committed only 11 turnovers.
• Scored 123 points.

Dallas:

• Shot 45% from the field.
• Made 6 three-pointers.
• Recorded 39 rebounds.
• Recorded 8 steals.
• Recorded 1 block.
• Committed 13 turnovers.
• Scored 108 points.

Looking at all of these categories together creates a much more reliable explanation of the result.

What stands out most from the player statistics

The first major takeaway is Maxey’s all-around contribution.

Thirty-four points would already make him the game’s leading scorer. Adding 8 rebounds and 10 assists makes the performance substantially more complete.

The second takeaway is Philadelphia’s supporting production.

Edgecombe scored 23 and Embiid scored 22, ensuring that Dallas could not focus exclusively on Maxey.

The third takeaway is Dallas’ lack of a 20-point scorer.

Christie led the Mavericks with 18, while Thompson finished with 14.

The fourth takeaway is the three-point gap.

Philadelphia made 13 threes compared with six for Dallas.

The fifth takeaway is the second quarter.

Philadelphia scored 41 points while Dallas scored only 24.

Together, these details explain much more about the game than the final score alone.

How to use these statistics for future matchup analysis

If you are comparing these teams in another matchup, several categories from this game are particularly useful.

Start with shooting efficiency

Field goal percentage and three-point percentage should be among the first numbers examined.

Philadelphia’s 53% field goal shooting and 36% three-point shooting were major strengths in this matchup.

Then examine shot volume

Dallas attempted 94 field goals compared with Philadelphia’s 90.

The Mavericks therefore had slightly more attempts, but Philadelphia converted more efficiently.

This is a classic example of why attempts should be evaluated alongside makes and percentages.

Check turnovers

Philadelphia’s 11 turnovers compared with Dallas’ 13 suggest a modest ball-security advantage.

A future matchup with a much larger turnover difference could produce a very different result.

Examine player concentration

Maxey’s 34 points were a major source of Philadelphia’s offense, but Edgecombe’s 23 and Embiid’s 22 provided valuable secondary scoring.

A future matchup would therefore be worth examining through both primary and secondary scoring.

Watch three-point production

The 13-6 difference in made threes is arguably the clearest team statistic to monitor.

If Dallas improves its three-point conversion while limiting Philadelphia’s perimeter efficiency, the statistical balance could change significantly.

Limitations of the available data

A responsible article about player statistics should also explain what the supplied information does not establish.

The provided data contains team-level shooting, rebounding, assists, turnovers, steals, blocks, starting lineups, and selected leading scorers.

It does not provide a complete individual box score for every player.

Because of that, this analysis does not invent individual minutes, field goal attempts, three-point attempts, free throw attempts, plus-minus figures, personal fouls, or points for players whose full lines were not supplied.

That limitation matters because detailed basketball analysis becomes less reliable when missing statistics are presented as facts.

The figures discussed here are based on the game information supplied for the January 2, 2026 matchup.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the 76ers in scoring against the Mavericks?

Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 34 points. He also recorded 8 rebounds and 10 assists.

Who led Dallas in scoring?

Max Christie led the Mavericks with 18 points. Klay Thompson was next among the listed Dallas scorers with 14 points.

What was the final score between Philadelphia and Dallas?

The 76ers defeated the Mavericks 123-108 on January 2, 2026, at American Airlines Center in Dallas.

How many three-pointers did Philadelphia make?

Philadelphia made 13 of 36 three-point attempts, shooting 36% from beyond the arc.

How many rebounds did each team have?

Philadelphia recorded 43 rebounds, while Dallas recorded 39.

Did Philadelphia win the season series?

Yes. Philadelphia won both listed meetings against Dallas during the season, giving the 76ers a 2-0 season-series advantage. The earlier meeting ended 121-114 on December 21, 2025.

Conclusion

The 76ers vs dallas mavericks match player stats show a Philadelphia victory built on efficient scoring, perimeter shooting, balanced offensive production, and a dramatic second-quarter response.

Tyrese Maxey was the standout performer with 34 points, 8 rebounds, and 10 assists. VJ Edgecombe added 23 points, Joel Embiid scored 22, and Paul George contributed 14. Dallas was led by Max Christie with 18 points and Klay Thompson with 14.

The team statistics provide an even clearer explanation. Philadelphia shot 53% from the field and 36% from three-point range, compared with Dallas at 45% and 21%. The 76ers made 13 three-pointers while the Mavericks made six. Philadelphia also held advantages in rebounds, steals, blocks, and turnovers.

Dallas did have a slightly higher assist total and free throw percentage, but those advantages were not enough to overcome Philadelphia’s stronger overall shooting performance.

The second quarter was the decisive moment. Philadelphia scored 41 points while Dallas scored 24, turning an early six-point deficit into a much more favorable position. The 76ers then maintained control and finished with a 123-108 victory.

For readers studying basketball statistics, the biggest lesson is that a box score should be read as a connected story. Maxey’s individual production mattered, but it became even more valuable because Philadelphia also received strong scoring from Edgecombe and Embiid. The team’s shooting efficiency, defensive activity, rebounding, and ball security all reinforced that individual production.

The result also completed Philadelphia’s 2-0 season sweep of Dallas, following the 121-114 victory in December.