76ers vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
The 76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats from the March 4, 2026 matchup tell a much bigger story than the 131-91 final score alone. San Antonio dominated Philadelphia across shooting, rebounding, passing, rim protection, and overall offensive efficiency at Xfinity Mobile Arena. The Spurs won every major statistical battle except for offensive rebounds and finished with a 40-point victory. Devin Vassell led San Antonio with 22 points, Stephon Castle controlled the game as a passer with 10 assists, and Victor Wembanyama made a major defensive impact with 8 rebounds and 6 blocks. For Philadelphia, Tyrese Maxey finished with 21 points and 8 rebounds, but the 76ers struggled to generate efficient offense throughout the night.
76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats: Game Overview
The March 4, 2026 meeting between the San Antonio Spurs and Philadelphia 76ers was one of those games where the final score accurately reflected the underlying numbers.
San Antonio entered the game with a 44-17 record and a 23-11 road mark. Philadelphia was 33-28 overall and 16-16 at home. Those records already suggested that the Spurs had been the stronger team during the season, but the statistical gap on this particular night was much larger than the standings alone would suggest.
The Spurs won 131-91.
That 40-point margin was created by a combination of factors rather than one isolated performance. San Antonio shot 55 percent from the field, made 40 percent of its three-point attempts, collected 56 rebounds, and recorded 36 assists. Philadelphia shot only 35 percent overall and 24 percent from three while producing 20 assists.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring also shows when the game truly separated.
San Antonio scored 32 points in the first quarter, followed by an enormous 46-point second quarter. Philadelphia managed 25 and 28 points in those opening periods. At halftime, the Spurs had established a substantial advantage.
The third quarter then turned the game into a rout.
San Antonio scored 35 points while Philadelphia managed only 11. That 24-point difference in one quarter effectively removed any realistic path for a Philadelphia comeback.
The fourth quarter was more balanced, with San Antonio scoring 18 and Philadelphia scoring 27, but by then the result was already settled.
Game at a glance
| Category | Spurs | 76ers |
| Final score | 131 | 91 |
| Field goals | 49-89 | 33-95 |
| Field-goal percentage | 55% | 35% |
| Three-pointers | 18-45 | 10-42 |
| Three-point percentage | 40% | 24% |
| Free throws | 15-18 | 15-19 |
| Rebounds | 56 | 40 |
| Assists | 36 | 20 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 13 |
| Steals | 10 | 8 |
| Blocks | 10 | 5 |
| Offensive rebounds | 6 | 9 |
| Defensive rebounds | 50 | 31 |
| Fouls | 20 | 16 |
The most important numbers are not necessarily the headline totals. San Antonio’s 55 percent shooting compared with Philadelphia’s 35 percent shooting created a massive efficiency gap. The Spurs also generated 36 assists on 49 made field goals, showing how consistently their offense produced quality opportunities.
How San Antonio Won the Statistical Battle
The simplest way to understand this game is to look at efficiency.
San Antonio attempted 89 shots and made 49. Philadelphia attempted even more, with 95 field-goal attempts, but made only 33.
That means Philadelphia actually had six more field-goal attempts but made 16 fewer shots.
This is a crucial distinction.
A team can sometimes overcome poor shooting by generating extra possessions, dominating the offensive glass, forcing turnovers, or getting to the free-throw line. Philadelphia did collect nine offensive rebounds compared with six for San Antonio, but that advantage was nowhere near enough to compensate for the difference in shooting.
San Antonio’s 18 made three-pointers were especially damaging.
The Spurs attempted 45 three-pointers and converted 18, good for 40 percent. Philadelphia attempted 42 and made only 10, converting 24 percent.
That created an eight-made-three advantage.
Eight additional three-pointers represent 24 extra points before considering any other scoring difference.
This explains a significant portion of the 40-point margin.
San Antonio also controlled the glass
The Spurs finished with 56 total rebounds against Philadelphia’s 40.
The more revealing figure is defensive rebounding.
San Antonio collected 50 defensive rebounds, while Philadelphia had only 31.
That meant the Spurs were consistently ending Philadelphia possessions after missed shots.
Philadelphia’s nine offensive rebounds gave the 76ers some second-chance opportunities, but their inability to convert enough of those possessions into points prevented the offensive-rebounding advantage from becoming meaningful.
Wembanyama’s presence also mattered here because rebounding and rim protection can influence possessions without appearing as points on the scoreboard.
76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats: Top Spurs Performers
The individual numbers provide a clearer explanation of why San Antonio controlled the game.
Devin Vassell led the Spurs in scoring
Devin Vassell finished as San Antonio’s leading scorer with 22 points.
That was enough to make him the top scorer on either team.
Vassell’s scoring performance was particularly important because San Antonio did not need one player to carry the entire offensive burden. The Spurs’ 36 assists demonstrate that their production came from a connected team attack.
When a team scores 131 points while also recording 36 assists, the offense is usually producing scoring opportunities through multiple players rather than depending exclusively on difficult individual shots.
Vassell’s 22 points therefore should be viewed in the context of the broader offensive structure.
He was the leading scorer, but San Antonio’s advantage came from collective efficiency.
Stephon Castle controlled the passing game
Stephon Castle recorded 10 assists, making him the game’s assist leader.
That number is one of the most important individual statistics in the entire box score.
San Antonio finished with 36 team assists. Castle alone accounted for 10 of them.
His performance highlights how the Spurs were able to create opportunities for teammates while maintaining an efficient shooting attack. A 10-assist performance in a 131-point game is evidence of substantial playmaking involvement.
Philadelphia finished with only 20 assists as a team.
The 16-assist difference between the teams is significant because it indicates that San Antonio was not simply making more shots. The Spurs were also generating more assisted scoring opportunities.
Victor Wembanyama dominated defensively
Victor Wembanyama finished with 8 rebounds and 6 blocks.
The six blocks were the most recorded by any player in the game.
That defensive production helps explain why Philadelphia struggled around the basket. Even when Wembanyama did not personally block a shot, his presence can alter the decision-making of attacking players.
The box score confirms that the Spurs finished with 10 blocks as a team, twice as many as Philadelphia’s five.
Wembanyama’s six blocks therefore represented the majority of San Antonio’s rim-protection production.
His eight rebounds also made him the Spurs’ top rebounder based on the supplied game data.
The Spurs’ starting group
San Antonio started:
- Julian Champagnie
- Victor Wembanyama
- De’Aaron Fox
- Devin Vassell
- Stephon Castle
This starting combination provided a mix of scoring, ball handling, perimeter play, size, and defensive length.
The most important point is that San Antonio did not need one statistical category to win the game. Its starting group contributed within a broader system that produced 49 made field goals, 18 made threes, 36 assists, 56 rebounds, 10 steals, and 10 blocks.
76ers Player Performance
Philadelphia’s individual statistics were led by Tyrese Maxey, who scored 21 points and collected 8 rebounds.
Maxey was the 76ers’ leading scorer and leading rebounder according to the supplied game data.
His 21 points represented a substantial portion of Philadelphia’s 91-point total.
However, one player’s scoring output could not compensate for the team’s overall shooting problems.
Philadelphia made 33 of 95 field-goal attempts.
That works out to approximately 34.7 percent, which corresponds with the listed 35 percent shooting figure.
The 76ers also made just 10 of 42 three-point attempts.
That is approximately 23.8 percent.
The combination of low overall shooting and low three-point accuracy made it extremely difficult for Philadelphia to stay within reach after San Antonio’s second-quarter explosion.
Philadelphia’s starting lineup
The 76ers started:
- Dominick Barlow
- Andre Drummond
- Quentin Grimes
- Tyrese Maxey
- VJ Edgecombe
This lineup faced a difficult matchup against a Spurs team that had both size and perimeter scoring.
Maxey’s 21 points were the clearest positive offensive figure for Philadelphia, while VJ Edgecombe recorded the team’s highest block total with two.
The defensive statistics were not enough to offset the offensive gap, though.
Philadelphia recorded eight steals and five blocks. San Antonio recorded 10 steals and 10 blocks.
That means the Spurs generated 20 defensive plays through steals and blocks combined, compared with 13 for the 76ers.
Why the 40-Point Margin Happened
A 40-point NBA victory can look extraordinary when viewed only through the final score.
The box score makes it easier to understand.
San Antonio had advantages in almost every major category.
The Spurs:
- Shot 55 percent from the field.
- Shot 40 percent from three.
- Made 18 three-pointers.
- Grabbed 56 rebounds.
- Recorded 36 assists.
- Produced 10 steals.
- Recorded 10 blocks.
- Held Philadelphia to 35 percent shooting.
- Held Philadelphia to 24 percent three-point shooting.
- Outscored Philadelphia by 24 points in the third quarter.
Philadelphia’s nine offensive rebounds were a genuine positive, but they did not translate into enough efficient scoring.
This is an important lesson when interpreting basketball statistics.
A team can win an individual category and still lose the game decisively.
The second quarter was a major turning point
San Antonio scored 46 points in the second quarter.
That is the single biggest quarter total recorded by either team in the game.
Philadelphia scored 28.
The Spurs therefore won the second period by 18 points.
A team scoring 46 points in one quarter while maintaining efficient shooting puts enormous pressure on the opponent. Philadelphia needed to respond offensively, but instead the third quarter produced an even larger separation.
The third quarter finished the game
The third quarter was arguably the decisive statistical segment.
San Antonio scored 35.
Philadelphia scored 11.
The Spurs therefore won the quarter by 24 points.
Philadelphia’s 11-point output was the lowest quarter total for either team in the game.
That sequence transformed a large halftime advantage into an overwhelming lead.
It also explains why the fourth-quarter result should not be overinterpreted. Philadelphia outscored San Antonio 27-18 in the final quarter, but that happened after the game had already been effectively decided.
Shooting Efficiency Tells the Real Story
When analyzing the 76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats, shooting percentage is one of the first places to look.
San Antonio’s 55 percent field-goal rate was 20 percentage points higher than Philadelphia’s 35 percent.
That is a massive difference.
The Spurs also made 18 three-pointers compared with 10 from Philadelphia.
The eight-three difference produced a major scoring advantage.
Interestingly, the teams were relatively close at the free-throw line.
San Antonio went 15-18 for 83 percent.
Philadelphia went 15-19 for 79 percent.
That means free-throw accuracy was not the reason for the result.
The decisive difference came primarily from field goals and three-point shooting.
This is useful when assessing the game because it prevents the analysis from focusing too heavily on free throws, fouls, or turnovers.
Turnovers Were Not the Main Problem for Philadelphia
Philadelphia actually committed fewer turnovers.
The 76ers had 13 turnovers.
The Spurs had 15.
At first glance, that might seem surprising given the size of the final margin.
It demonstrates why turnovers alone cannot explain the outcome.
San Antonio committed two more turnovers but still won by 40 points.
The Spurs compensated through superior shooting, rebounding, assists, steals, blocks, and overall offensive production.
This is one of the most important insights in the box score.
If someone looked only at turnovers, they might conclude that Philadelphia protected the ball better and therefore performed reasonably well.
The complete statistical picture says something very different.
Rebounding Breakdown
San Antonio won the total rebounding battle 56-40.
The Spurs also dominated defensive rebounding 50-31.
Philadelphia won offensive rebounds 9-6.
That split is worth examining.
Philadelphia’s offensive rebounding advantage shows that the 76ers were able to recover some of their own missed shots.
However, the Spurs’ defensive rebounding advantage was much larger.
San Antonio collected 19 more defensive rebounds than Philadelphia.
That means the Spurs consistently secured missed shots and prevented Philadelphia from extending possessions.
For a team already shooting only 35 percent, losing second-chance opportunities can be costly.
The rebounding numbers therefore reinforced San Antonio’s shooting advantage rather than simply existing as an independent statistic.
Playmaking Was Another Major Difference
The Spurs recorded 36 assists.
The 76ers recorded 20.
That is a 16-assist advantage for San Antonio.
Put another way, San Antonio recorded 80 percent more assists than Philadelphia.
This suggests a major difference in offensive connectivity.
The Spurs were repeatedly finding teammates for scoring opportunities.
Philadelphia’s offense produced fewer assisted baskets while also converting shots at a much lower rate.
Castle’s 10 assists were particularly important in this area.
A team does not accidentally reach 36 assists while scoring 131 points. The numbers point toward a highly productive passing attack.
Defensive Impact Beyond the Score
San Antonio’s defensive statistics were also striking.
The Spurs recorded:
- 10 steals
- 10 blocks
- 50 defensive rebounds
Philadelphia recorded:
- 8 steals
- 5 blocks
- 31 defensive rebounds
The most significant gap was blocks.
San Antonio doubled Philadelphia’s block total.
Wembanyama alone recorded six.
This combination of rim protection and defensive rebounding helped San Antonio finish possessions.
It also created an environment in which Philadelphia had fewer comfortable scoring opportunities.
What the Matchup Says About Each Team
The game should not be treated as proof that every future meeting between these teams will produce the same result.
NBA games are highly dependent on player availability, shooting variance, rotations, matchup adjustments, and game context.
Instead, this particular result reveals several clear characteristics of the matchup on March 4, 2026.
San Antonio showed offensive balance
The Spurs’ 131 points came with 36 assists and 49 made field goals.
That combination indicates balanced offensive production.
Vassell led the team with 22 points, but the offense did not require him to score 35 or 40 points.
Castle’s 10 assists provided playmaking.
Wembanyama contributed eight rebounds and six blocks.
The overall statistical distribution suggests that San Antonio’s strength came from several players performing complementary roles.
Philadelphia depended heavily on Maxey’s scoring
Maxey’s 21 points made him Philadelphia’s leading scorer.
But the team’s total was only 91.
The difference between Maxey’s individual production and the team’s overall offensive output demonstrates the larger issue. Philadelphia needed more efficient contributions across the lineup.
A 21-point game from a primary scorer can be enough to win when the supporting cast shoots efficiently.
In this matchup, that did not happen.
A Deeper Look at the 131 Points
San Antonio’s 131-point total deserves context.
The Spurs scored:
- 32 points in the first quarter
- 46 points in the second quarter
- 35 points in the third quarter
- 18 points in the fourth quarter
The first three quarters produced 113 points.
That means San Antonio had already scored 113 points before the final period.
The fourth-quarter drop to 18 points is therefore not evidence of a weak offensive game. It largely reflects the reality of a game that had already become one-sided.
Philadelphia’s quarter totals were:
- 25
- 28
- 11
- 27
The 11-point third quarter was the biggest problem.
Philadelphia scored 53 points in the first half but only 38 after halftime.
San Antonio scored 78 points in the first half and 53 after halftime.
The first-half difference alone was 25 points.
What Fans Should Look for in Future Matchups
If these teams meet again, several statistical areas would be worth watching.
1. Three-point efficiency
Philadelphia made 10 of 42 threes.
San Antonio made 18 of 45.
That is the clearest perimeter difference.
A future matchup would look very different if Philadelphia improved from 24 percent to a league-average level while San Antonio’s shooting dropped closer to normal variance.
2. Wembanyama’s defensive influence
Wembanyama recorded six blocks.
Future Philadelphia possessions against him would need to account for his ability to affect shots near the rim.
Even without a recorded block, a defender can influence where and when an offensive player attempts a shot.
3. Castle’s playmaking
Castle recorded 10 assists.
Philadelphia would need to reduce the quality of the opportunities created by San Antonio’s primary playmakers.
4. Maxey’s supporting production
Maxey scored 21 points.
The larger question for Philadelphia is whether the rest of the offense can produce efficiently alongside him.
5. Defensive rebounding
San Antonio’s 50 defensive rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 31.
That is too large a difference to ignore.
Philadelphia’s offensive rebounds were useful, but limiting San Antonio’s second-chance opportunities was not enough to overcome the broader rebounding gap.
Understanding Player Stats Beyond Points
One common mistake when reading NBA box scores is to rank performances entirely by scoring.
The 76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats show why that approach can be misleading.
Vassell’s 22 points made him San Antonio’s top scorer.
But Castle’s 10 assists were also highly influential.
Wembanyama’s six blocks were another major defensive contribution.
Maxey’s 21 points led Philadelphia, while his eight rebounds also made him the team’s top rebounder.
These statistics represent different responsibilities.
A point total measures scoring.
Assists measure direct creation for teammates.
Rebounds measure possession control.
Blocks measure defensive disruption.
Steals measure defensive events that can immediately change possession.
A complete player analysis should consider all of these categories together.
The Most Important Individual Numbers
Here is a concise summary of the leading individual statistics supplied for the game:
| Player | Team | Key statistic |
| Devin Vassell | Spurs | 22 points |
| Stephon Castle | Spurs | 10 assists |
| Victor Wembanyama | Spurs | 8 rebounds, 6 blocks |
| Tyrese Maxey | 76ers | 21 points, 8 rebounds |
| VJ Edgecombe | 76ers | 2 blocks |
These numbers make it easy to identify the statistical leaders without confusing scoring leadership with overall impact.
Season Series Context
The supplied data lists San Antonio as leading the season series 1-0 after this matchup.
That matters because a single game can provide useful matchup information, but it does not establish a permanent competitive hierarchy.
The Spurs entered the contest at 44-17, while Philadelphia was 33-28.
San Antonio’s record indicated stronger season-long performance at the time of the game.
The Spurs were also 23-11 away from home, while Philadelphia was 16-16 at home.
Those records provide useful context for understanding why the road team was capable of producing such a dominant result.
What the Box Score Does Not Tell You
Even a detailed box score has limitations.
The supplied statistics tell us what happened numerically, but they do not provide every tactical detail.
For example, the box score does not independently explain:
- Which defensive assignments were used possession by possession
- How often specific players were targeted
- The exact shot locations for every attempt
- Which lineup combinations produced the best stretches
- Whether a particular injury affected a player’s movement
- How defensive schemes changed during the game
- Which players generated hockey assists that led to eventual baskets
That distinction matters for responsible analysis.
A box score can establish that San Antonio shot 55 percent and Philadelphia shot 35 percent.
It cannot, by itself, establish every tactical reason behind those percentages.
The safest conclusion is therefore to connect statistical evidence with reasonable basketball interpretation while avoiding claims that the available data cannot prove.
Why the Final Score Should Not Be the Only Statistic You Read
The 131-91 score is dramatic, but the underlying numbers make it more meaningful.
San Antonio did not win because of one unusual statistical event.
The Spurs were better in multiple areas simultaneously.
They shot better.
They made more threes.
They passed more effectively.
They rebounded better overall.
They protected their defensive glass.
They recorded more steals.
They blocked more shots.
They scored 78 points in the first half.
They scored 35 points in the third quarter while Philadelphia scored 11.
When several categories point in the same direction, the final result is easier to explain.
That is what makes this box score particularly useful for fans, analysts, fantasy basketball followers, and anyone trying to understand team performance rather than simply memorize the final score.
A Practical Framework for Reading Future NBA Match Stats
When analyzing another game, a useful approach is to move through the numbers in this order.
Step 1: Start with shooting
Check field-goal percentage and three-point percentage.
These numbers often explain the largest portion of scoring efficiency.
Step 2: Check possession-related statistics
Look at turnovers and offensive rebounds.
These help explain how many additional opportunities each team received.
Step 3: Check the defensive glass
Total rebounds are useful, but defensive rebounds can reveal whether a team consistently finished possessions.
Step 4: Review assists
Assists provide context for whether an offense relied on individual shot creation or generated scoring through ball movement.
Step 5: Examine defensive events
Steals and blocks can reveal how aggressively and effectively teams disrupted opponents.
Step 6: Put individual numbers into team context
A 25-point performance means something different when a team scores 140 than when it scores 90.
Always compare player production with the team’s overall output.
Step 7: Review quarter-by-quarter scoring
Quarter splits can identify when the game changed.
That is especially important in blowouts, where the fourth quarter may be far less informative than the second or third.
76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats: Key Takeaways
The most important lessons from this matchup can be summarized clearly.
San Antonio’s 131-91 win was built on efficiency and balance.
The Spurs shot 55 percent from the field and 40 percent from three.
Philadelphia shot 35 percent overall and 24 percent from three.
San Antonio made 18 three-pointers compared with Philadelphia’s 10.
The Spurs recorded 36 assists compared with 20 for the 76ers.
San Antonio won total rebounds 56-40 and defensive rebounds 50-31.
The Spurs also recorded 10 blocks, with Wembanyama contributing six.
Vassell led all scorers with 22 points.
Castle led all players in assists with 10.
Wembanyama led San Antonio in rebounds with eight and blocks with six.
Maxey led Philadelphia in scoring with 21 points and also led the team in rebounds with eight.
The quarter-by-quarter numbers reveal that the second and third quarters were the decisive periods.
The Spurs scored 46 points in the second quarter and 35 in the third.
Philadelphia scored only 11 in the third.
That statistical sequence explains the 40-point final margin more effectively than the final score alone.
Frequently Asked Questions
What were the final 76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats?
San Antonio defeated Philadelphia 131-91 on March 4, 2026. Devin Vassell led the Spurs with 22 points, Stephon Castle had 10 assists, and Victor Wembanyama recorded 8 rebounds and 6 blocks. Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 21 points and 8 rebounds.
Who was the top scorer in the Spurs vs 76ers game?
Devin Vassell was the game’s leading scorer with 22 points for San Antonio. Tyrese Maxey was Philadelphia’s leading scorer with 21 points.
How many points did Tyrese Maxey score against the Spurs?
Tyrese Maxey scored 21 points for Philadelphia in the March 4, 2026 matchup.
How many blocks did Victor Wembanyama have?
Victor Wembanyama recorded 6 blocks. He was the leading shot blocker in the game, while San Antonio finished with 10 blocks as a team.
Who had the most assists in the game?
Stephon Castle led all players with 10 assists. San Antonio finished with 36 assists as a team, compared with 20 for Philadelphia.
What was the biggest reason the Spurs won?
The largest statistical differences were shooting efficiency, three-point production, rebounding, assists, and defensive activity. San Antonio shot 55 percent from the field and 40 percent from three, while Philadelphia shot 35 percent and 24 percent respectively.
Conclusion
The March 4, 2026 meeting between San Antonio and Philadelphia was a clear example of how several statistical advantages can combine to create a decisive NBA result.
San Antonio’s 131-91 victory was driven by efficient shooting, strong three-point production, superior rebounding, excellent ball movement, and disruptive defense. The Spurs finished with 49 made field goals, 18 made three-pointers, 56 rebounds, 36 assists, 10 steals, and 10 blocks.
Philadelphia’s nine offensive rebounds and lower turnover total were positive individual areas, but they were overwhelmed by the team’s poor shooting efficiency. The 76ers made only 33 of 95 field-goal attempts and 10 of 42 three-point attempts.
The individual leaders also illustrate the different ways players influence a game. Vassell led scoring with 22 points, Castle controlled playmaking with 10 assists, and Wembanyama produced a major defensive performance with six blocks and eight rebounds. Maxey remained Philadelphia’s primary statistical scorer with 21 points and also collected eight rebounds.
Ultimately, the 76ers vs san antonio spurs match player stats are most useful when read as a connected story rather than as isolated numbers. The 40-point margin came from sustained advantages across several categories, with the second and third quarters creating the decisive separation.
For readers evaluating this game or comparing future matchups, the most meaningful approach is to examine shooting efficiency, three-point accuracy, rebounding, assists, defensive events, and quarter-by-quarter performance together. That method provides a more reliable picture of what actually happened on the court than focusing on the final score or one player’s point total.
