arizona cardinals vs los angeles rams match player stats
The arizona cardinals vs los angeles rams match player stats from the December 8, 2025 NFC West showdown tell the story of a game that quickly shifted in favor of Los Angeles. While the final score of 45 to 17 highlights the difference on the scoreboard, the numbers reveal much more than a one sided contest. They explain how the Rams controlled the game through efficient quarterback play, explosive rushing, dominant receiving performances, and a defense that consistently pressured Arizona’s offense.
Played on December 8, 2025, the Rams improved to a 10 and 3 record with an impressive road victory, while the Cardinals fell to 3 and 10. Every phase of the game contributed to the result. Matthew Stafford delivered another efficient passing performance, Blake Corum and Kyren Williams overwhelmed the Cardinals on the ground, and Puka Nacua turned limited opportunities into massive gains. On the other side, Jacoby Brissett and Michael Wilson produced respectable passing numbers, but Arizona struggled to establish balance because of an ineffective rushing attack and an inability to stop Los Angeles on defense.
This detailed breakdown goes beyond basic box score numbers. It examines the performances that decided the game, compares offensive and defensive efficiency, highlights the biggest statistical takeaways, and explains what these results mean for both teams moving forward.
Match Overview
| Match Detail | Result |
| Game | Los Angeles Rams vs Arizona Cardinals |
| Date | December 8, 2025 |
| Final Score | Rams 45, Cardinals 17 |
| Rams Record | 10 and 3 |
| Cardinals Record | 3 and 10 |
| Winning Team | Los Angeles Rams |
The Rams entered this divisional matchup with momentum and delivered one of their most complete performances of the season. Their offense scored in every quarter, while the defense limited Arizona’s running game and forced critical mistakes.
Quarter by Quarter Score
| Quarter | Rams | Cardinals |
| First | 10 | 7 |
| Second | 14 | 3 |
| Third | 14 | 0 |
| Fourth | 7 | 7 |
| Total | 45 | 17 |
The third quarter effectively ended any hopes of an Arizona comeback. Los Angeles scored 14 unanswered points while the Cardinals failed to put any points on the board.
Arizona Cardinals vs Los Angeles Rams Match Player Stats
The overall statistical comparison explains why Los Angeles dominated nearly every important category.
| Category | Rams | Cardinals |
| Passing Yards | 281 | 271 |
| Rushing Yards | 249 | 51 |
| Total Offensive Yards | 530 | 322 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 3 | 2 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 3 | 0 |
| Total Touchdowns | 6 | 2 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks Allowed | 0 | 3 |
Although passing production was relatively close, the difference came on the ground. The Rams rushed for nearly five times as many yards as Arizona, creating manageable situations throughout the game and keeping the Cardinals’ defense under constant pressure.
Quarterback Performance Breakdown
Quarterback efficiency often determines the outcome of NFL games, and this matchup was another example.
Matthew Stafford
Matthew Stafford completed 22 of 31 passes for 281 yards and three touchdowns without throwing an interception.
Passing Statistics
| Stat | Value |
| Completions | 22 |
| Attempts | 31 |
| Passing Yards | 281 |
| Average | 9.1 |
| Touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 0 |
| QBR | 86.7 |
| Passer Rating | 131.2 |
Stafford displayed exceptional command of the offense. His decision making was quick, his throws were accurate, and he consistently found receivers in favorable matchups. Most importantly, he protected the football while maximizing scoring opportunities.
A passer rating above 130 reflects one of the most efficient games of the season, particularly against a division rival.
Jacoby Brissett
Jacoby Brissett fought hard despite facing consistent defensive pressure.
| Stat | Value |
| Completions | 25 |
| Attempts | 44 |
| Passing Yards | 271 |
| Average | 6.2 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks Taken | 3 |
| QBR | 47.0 |
| Passer Rating | 80.8 |
Brissett completed more passes than Stafford, but he needed thirteen additional attempts to reach nearly the same yardage. Lower efficiency combined with an interception limited Arizona’s offensive rhythm.
Rams Running Game Dominated the Contest
The Rams’ rushing attack completely changed the complexion of the game.
Instead of relying exclusively on Stafford’s arm, Los Angeles repeatedly attacked Arizona’s defensive front with explosive runs. This balanced offensive approach opened passing lanes and kept the Cardinals guessing throughout four quarters.
Blake Corum’s Breakout Performance
Blake Corum produced one of the best rushing games of the week.
| Stat | Value |
| Carries | 12 |
| Rushing Yards | 128 |
| Average | 10.7 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Long Run | 48 |
Averaging more than ten yards per carry is rare in the NFL, making Corum’s performance especially impressive.
His longest run of 48 yards showcased both vision and acceleration.
Kyren Williams Continued His Strong Season
Williams complemented Corum perfectly.
| Stat | Value |
| Carries | 13 |
| Yards | 84 |
| Average | 6.5 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Long Run | 18 |
Instead of depending on one running back, Los Angeles consistently rotated fresh legs into the offense.
Rams Team Rushing
| Category | Total |
| Carries | 36 |
| Yards | 249 |
| Average | 6.9 |
| Touchdowns | 3 |
Nearly seven yards per carry illustrates complete offensive line dominance.
Every successful rushing attempt reduced pressure on Stafford while wearing down Arizona’s defense.
Cardinals Running Game Never Found Momentum
Arizona struggled to establish any consistency on the ground.
The Rams controlled the line of scrimmage, limiting rushing lanes and forcing Brissett to throw more often than the Cardinals likely intended.
Leading Rushers
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average |
| Jacoby Brissett | 4 | 22 | 5.5 |
| Bam Knight | 7 | 16 | 2.3 |
| Michael Carter | 3 | 13 | 4.3 |
Team Totals
| Category | Total |
| Carries | 14 |
| Yards | 51 |
| Average | 3.6 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
A team cannot expect to compete consistently after rushing for only 51 yards against an opponent that gained 249.
That imbalance forced Arizona into predictable passing situations throughout the afternoon.
Puka Nacua Delivered the Biggest Receiving Performance
Puka Nacua once again demonstrated why he remains one of the NFL’s most dangerous receivers.
He consistently created separation, turned short completions into explosive gains, and finished drives with touchdowns.
| Stat | Value |
| Receptions | 7 |
| Receiving Yards | 167 |
| Average | 23.9 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Long Reception | 32 |
| Targets | 11 |
Nearly 24 yards per reception shows remarkable efficiency.
Rather than accumulating short catches, Nacua repeatedly stretched the field and punished defensive coverage mistakes.
His two touchdown receptions helped build an advantage Arizona never recovered from.
Other Rams Receiving Contributions
Although Nacua stole the spotlight, several teammates made meaningful contributions.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Touchdowns |
| Colby Parkinson | 3 | 32 | 1 |
| Davante Adams | 4 | 29 | 0 |
| Davis Allen | 2 | 21 | 0 |
| Kyren Williams | 2 | 13 | 0 |
| Xavier Smith | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Jordan Whittington | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Konata Mumpfield | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Blake Corum | 1 | 3 | 0 |
This balanced receiving production prevented Arizona from focusing entirely on one target.
Whenever defenders shifted attention toward Nacua, Stafford confidently distributed the football elsewhere.
Rams Passing Distribution
Los Angeles finished with:
| Category | Total |
| Receptions | 22 |
| Receiving Yards | 281 |
| Average | 12.8 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 3 |
| Targets | 31 |
Every completion contributed to an efficient offensive performance, and the passing attack complemented an already dominant rushing game rather than carrying the entire offense.
Michael Wilson Was Arizona’s Bright Spot
Despite the disappointing result, Michael Wilson delivered an outstanding individual performance. He consistently found space in the Rams’ secondary and gave Jacoby Brissett a reliable target throughout the afternoon.
Although the Cardinals struggled to keep pace on the scoreboard, Wilson’s production showed he can be a dependable playmaker when given opportunities.
Michael Wilson Receiving Statistics
| Stat | Value |
| Receptions | 11 |
| Receiving Yards | 142 |
| Average | 12.9 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 2 |
| Long Reception | 25 |
| Targets | 16 |
Wilson accounted for more than half of Arizona’s receiving yards and scored both of the team’s touchdowns. His ability to create separation helped sustain several drives, even while the offense struggled in other areas.
Cardinals Receiving Unit Performance
Wilson led the way, but several other receivers contributed meaningful yardage.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | Touchdowns |
| Michael Wilson | 11 | 142 | 12.9 | 2 |
| Trey McBride | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 0 |
| Jalen Brooks | 2 | 32 | 16.0 | 0 |
| Michael Carter | 2 | 18 | 9.0 | 0 |
| Bam Knight | 3 | 18 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Andre Baccellia | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Elijah Higgins | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Trent Sherfield | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
| Josiah Deguara | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Team Receiving Totals
| Category | Total |
| Receptions | 25 |
| Receiving Yards | 271 |
| Average | 10.8 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 2 |
| Targets | 44 |
The receiving production itself was respectable. However, without a productive rushing attack, the Cardinals became one dimensional. That allowed the Rams’ defense to focus primarily on defending the pass during key situations.
Defensive Performance Comparison
While offensive numbers often grab headlines, defense played an equally important role in determining the outcome.
Los Angeles consistently pressured Jacoby Brissett, prevented Arizona from establishing the run, and created the game’s only turnover.
Arizona’s defense worked hard throughout the contest but spent too much time on the field because the offense struggled to sustain long scoring drives.
Team Defensive Statistics
| Category | Rams | Cardinals |
| Total Tackles | 50 | 80 |
| Solo Tackles | 34 | 32 |
| Sacks | 3 | 0 |
| Tackles for Loss | 1 | 0 |
| Passes Defended | 6 | 2 |
| Quarterback Hits | 11 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
The Cardinals recorded significantly more tackles because the Rams controlled possession and ran far more offensive plays. High tackle totals are not always a positive indicator, especially when they result from defending long drives.
Rams Defensive Standouts
Several Rams defenders made timely plays that limited Arizona’s opportunities.
Omar Speights
| Stat | Value |
| Total Tackles | 6 |
| Solo Tackles | 5 |
| Sacks | 0 |
Speights consistently arrived around the football and helped contain Arizona’s rushing attempts.
Kam Curl
| Stat | Value |
| Total Tackles | 6 |
| Solo Tackles | 3 |
| Tackles for Loss | 1 |
Curl’s ability to attack near the line of scrimmage disrupted several Cardinals plays before they developed.
Byron Young
| Stat | Value |
| Total Tackles | 4 |
| Solo Tackles | 2 |
| Sacks | 1 |
Young’s sack came at an important moment, forcing Arizona into a difficult passing situation.
Nate Landman
Landman recorded the game’s only interception.
| Stat | Value |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Return Yards | 0 |
Although the interception did not result in a defensive touchdown, it eliminated a Cardinals scoring opportunity and shifted momentum further toward Los Angeles.
Cardinals Defensive Leaders
Arizona’s defense showed determination despite spending much of the afternoon defending sustained Rams drives.
Owen Pappoe
| Stat | Value |
| Total Tackles | 10 |
| Solo Tackles | 6 |
Pappoe led all Cardinals defenders and remained active throughout the game.
Other Defensive Contributors
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo Tackles |
| Jalen Thompson | 7 | 3 |
| PJ Mustipher | 7 | 2 |
| Budda Baker | 6 | 3 |
| Baron Browning | 6 | 1 |
Although these players produced solid individual numbers, Arizona’s defense could not consistently slow the Rams’ balanced offense.
Special Teams Analysis
Special teams rarely decide games on their own, but they often influence field position and momentum.
Rams Special Teams
Kick Returns
| Player | Returns | Yards | Average |
| Jordan Whittington | 2 | 54 | 27.0 |
| Ronnie Rivers | 1 | 30 | 30.0 |
Team Total
| Returns | Yards | Average |
| 3 | 84 | 28.0 |
Punt Returns
| Player | Returns | Yards | Average |
| Xavier Smith | 3 | 46 | 15.3 |
Harrison Mevis
| Category | Result |
| Field Goals | 1 of 1 |
| Long Field Goal | 26 |
| Extra Points | 6 of 6 |
| Total Points | 9 |
Mevis converted every kicking opportunity, helping complete one of the Rams’ most efficient offensive performances.
Ethan Evans
| Category | Result |
| Punts | 3 |
| Average | 46.7 |
| Long | 56 |
Cardinals Special Teams
Kick Returns
| Player | Returns | Yards | Average |
| Jalen Brooks | 3 | 66 | 22.0 |
Arizona did not record a punt return during the game.
Chad Ryland
| Category | Result |
| Field Goals | 1 of 2 |
| Long | 38 |
| Extra Points | 2 of 2 |
| Total Points | 5 |
Missing one field goal limited Arizona’s chances to reduce the deficit.
Matt Haack
| Category | Result |
| Punts | 5 |
| Average | 54.2 |
| Inside 20 | 2 |
| Long | 57 |
Haack delivered a strong punting performance, but the offense could not consistently capitalize on improved field position.
Biggest Statistical Takeaways
Several statistics explain why the Rams earned such a convincing victory.
- Los Angeles rushed for 249 yards while Arizona managed only 51.
- Matthew Stafford threw three touchdown passes without an interception.
- Blake Corum averaged an outstanding 10.7 yards per carry.
- Puka Nacua finished with 167 receiving yards and two touchdowns.
- The Rams produced six total touchdowns compared to Arizona’s two.
- Los Angeles recorded three sacks while allowing none.
- Arizona committed the game’s only turnover.
- The Rams finished with 530 total offensive yards compared to Arizona’s 322.
Each of these numbers contributed to the final result, but together they illustrate complete control by Los Angeles from the opening quarter through the final whistle.
What This Game Means for Both Teams
For the Rams, this victory reinforced why they were among the NFC’s strongest contenders. Their offense displayed balance, efficiency, and explosiveness. Winning on the road by four touchdowns against a division rival demonstrated that the team could succeed in multiple ways, whether through the passing game, rushing attack, or defensive pressure.
For Arizona, the loss highlighted several areas requiring improvement. The passing game produced encouraging moments, particularly through Michael Wilson, but the lack of rushing production placed too much responsibility on Jacoby Brissett. Defensively, limiting explosive plays and creating more pressure on opposing quarterbacks remain priorities moving forward.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the December 8, 2025 Rams vs Cardinals game?
The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Arizona Cardinals by a score of 45 to 17.
Who led the Rams in passing?
Matthew Stafford completed 22 of 31 passes for 281 yards and three touchdowns without throwing an interception.
Who had the most rushing yards in the game?
Blake Corum led all rushers with 128 yards on 12 carries while scoring two touchdowns.
Which receiver had the most receiving yards?
Puka Nacua led the game with seven receptions for 167 yards and two touchdowns.
Who was Arizona’s leading receiver?
Michael Wilson recorded 11 receptions for 142 yards and both Cardinals receiving touchdowns.
How many rushing yards did the Rams finish with?
Los Angeles rushed for 249 yards on 36 carries, averaging 6.9 yards per attempt.
Conclusion
The arizona cardinals vs los angeles rams match player stats demonstrate just how complete the Rams’ performance was on December 8, 2025. Los Angeles excelled in every major phase of the game, combining efficient quarterback play with a dominant rushing attack, explosive receiving production, and a disciplined defensive effort. Matthew Stafford managed the offense with precision, Blake Corum and Kyren Williams controlled the ground game, and Puka Nacua delivered another elite performance as the primary receiving threat.
Arizona showed flashes of offensive potential through Jacoby Brissett and Michael Wilson, but the inability to establish a consistent running game and generate defensive stops proved costly. When comparing both teams across passing efficiency, rushing production, defensive pressure, and turnover margin, the difference becomes clear. The Rams consistently executed at a higher level, resulting in a convincing 45 to 17 victory and strengthening their position in the NFC standings.
