Cleveland Cavaliers vs 76ers Match Player Stats
The cleveland cavaliers vs 76ers match player stats from January 15, 2026, tell a much bigger story than the final score alone. Cleveland defeated Philadelphia 133-107 at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia, producing one of its strongest offensive performances of the matchup while controlling the glass and moving the ball at a level the 76ers could not match.
Donovan Mitchell was the central figure for Cleveland, finishing with 35 points, 7 rebounds, and 9 assists while posting a team-best +29 plus/minus. Evan Mobley added 17 points and 13 rebounds with 6 assists, while Darius Garland contributed 20 points and 7 assists. For Philadelphia, Joel Embiid led the team with 20 points, followed by Paul George with 17 and Tyrese Maxey with 14.
The 26-point margin was built through several connected advantages. Cleveland shot 53% from the field compared with Philadelphia’s 40%, made 20 of 46 three-point attempts, collected 52 rebounds, and recorded 41 assists. Philadelphia made only 12 of 43 three-point attempts and finished with 22 assists.
This article breaks down the complete player production, team numbers, game flow, and the statistical reasons Cleveland controlled the contest.
Cleveland Cavaliers vs 76ers Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The game was played on January 15, 2026, in Philadelphia. Cleveland entered the contest with a 23-19 record and a 9-9 road mark, while Philadelphia stood at 22-17 with a 10-10 home record.
Cleveland won every quarter except the second:
| Quarter | Cleveland | Philadelphia |
| 1st | 33 | 18 |
| 2nd | 27 | 29 |
| 3rd | 33 | 28 |
| 4th | 40 | 32 |
| Final | 133 | 107 |
The opening quarter established the tone. Cleveland scored 33 points while holding Philadelphia to 18. The 15-point first-quarter advantage gave the Cavaliers room to absorb Philadelphia’s second-quarter response without losing control of the game.
The third quarter was another important turning point. Cleveland scored 33 points to Philadelphia’s 28, increasing its lead again. The Cavaliers then produced their biggest scoring quarter in the fourth, putting up 40 points.
That progression matters because this was not simply a case of Cleveland getting hot early and surviving. The Cavaliers continued creating offense throughout the game and finished with their highest scoring period.
Cleveland’s Offensive Performance
Cleveland’s offensive numbers explain why the team reached 133 points.
The Cavaliers shot:
- 50-of-95 from the field
- 20-of-46 from three-point range
- 13-of-18 from the free-throw line
- 53% overall from the field
- 43% from three
- 72% from the free-throw line
Making 50 field goals on 95 attempts gave Cleveland a 52.6% field-goal percentage, which rounds to the listed 53%.
The three-point shooting was especially important. Cleveland attempted 46 three-pointers and converted 20. That means almost half of its field-goal attempts came from beyond the arc, while the team still maintained excellent overall shooting efficiency.
The combination of volume and accuracy made it difficult for Philadelphia to keep pace.
Cleveland also produced 41 assists. That number is significant because it shows the scoring was not dependent entirely on Mitchell creating difficult shots. The offense generated opportunities for multiple players.
Donovan Mitchell Leads the Cavaliers
Donovan Mitchell was the standout player of the game.
His line was:
- 35 points
- 7 rebounds
- 9 assists
- +29 plus/minus
Mitchell led Cleveland in scoring and assists while also ranking among the team’s leading rebounders.
His nine assists are particularly important when evaluating his performance. A 35-point scoring night can sometimes indicate a player carrying an offense through individual shot creation. Here, Mitchell also created opportunities for teammates.
His +29 plus/minus further reinforces his overall influence. Cleveland outscored Philadelphia by 29 points during Mitchell’s minutes, the best plus/minus figure among the Cavaliers listed in the supplied data.
From a game-analysis perspective, that combination of scoring, playmaking, rebounding, and on-court impact makes Mitchell the clearest statistical centerpiece of the victory.
Evan Mobley Controls the Interior
Evan Mobley delivered one of the most complete performances for Cleveland.
He finished with:
- 17 points
- 13 rebounds
- 6 assists
The 13 rebounds were a team high.
Mobley’s contribution is important because Cleveland did not win solely through perimeter shooting. The Cavaliers also dominated the rebounding battle 52-42.
His six assists added another dimension to his performance. A frontcourt player contributing 13 rebounds and six assists helps connect different parts of an offense, especially when the primary scorer is also generating opportunities for teammates.
Mobley’s rebounding was also part of Cleveland’s broader advantage in possession control. Every additional defensive rebound reduces Philadelphia’s opportunity for second chances, while offensive rebounds can create additional scoring possessions.
Darius Garland Provides Secondary Playmaking
Darius Garland finished with:
- 20 points
- 3 rebounds
- 7 assists
Garland’s 20 points gave Cleveland another 20-point scorer alongside Mitchell.
More importantly, his seven assists helped Cleveland reach 41 total assists. When Mitchell and Garland are both creating offense, the defense has to account for multiple ball handlers rather than focusing on one primary creator.
That helps explain why Cleveland was able to produce 133 points without relying exclusively on one player’s scoring.
Cleveland’s Starting Lineup
Cleveland’s starters combined scoring, rebounding, and playmaking effectively.
| Cavaliers Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Jarrett Allen | 10 | 5 | 2 |
| Evan Mobley | 17 | 13 | 6 |
| Donovan Mitchell | 35 | 7 | 9 |
| Darius Garland | 20 | 3 | 7 |
| Jaylon Tyson | 12 | 5 | 3 |
The five starters accounted for 94 points.
Mitchell’s 35 points were the obvious scoring highlight, but the distribution is equally revealing. Garland added 20, Mobley scored 17, Tyson had 12, and Allen contributed 10.
That gave Philadelphia several offensive threats to deal with.
Cleveland’s Bench Made a Difference
Cleveland also received useful production from its bench.
The supplied data highlights:
| Cavaliers Bench Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| De’Andre Hunter | 17 | 4 | 4 |
| Sam Merrill | 9 | 4 | 4 |
| Lonzo Ball | 3 | 3 | 3 |
De’Andre Hunter’s 17 points were particularly valuable. His scoring nearly matched Mobley’s total and gave Cleveland another reliable offensive contributor outside its starting group.
Sam Merrill contributed nine points, four rebounds, and four assists. Lonzo Ball added three points, three rebounds, and three assists.
The overall lesson from the bench numbers is that Cleveland received meaningful contributions beyond its headline scorers.
Philadelphia 76ers Offensive Performance
Philadelphia scored 107 points, but its shooting efficiency was substantially lower than Cleveland’s.
The 76ers finished with:
- 36-of-89 field goals
- 12-of-43 three-pointers
- 23-of-26 free throws
- 40% field-goal shooting
- 28% three-point shooting
- 88% free-throw shooting
The free-throw percentage was excellent, but Philadelphia did not generate enough efficient field-goal production to overcome its struggles from the floor.
The 12 made three-pointers on 43 attempts equaled 27.9%, which rounds to 28%.
This is one of the clearest statistical differences in the game. Cleveland made 20 three-pointers at 43%, while Philadelphia made only 12 at 28%.
That eight-made-three advantage represents 24 additional points from made threes alone.
Joel Embiid Leads Philadelphia
Joel Embiid was Philadelphia’s leading scorer with 20 points.
His line included:
- 20 points
- 4 rebounds
- 3 assists
Embiid reached the 20-point mark, but Cleveland’s defensive and team-wide efficiency prevented his production from becoming enough to change the outcome.
His four rebounds were also below Mobley’s 13, highlighting Cleveland’s advantage on the boards from its leading frontcourt contributor.
The important point is not that Embiid had an ineffective scoring night in isolation. He led Philadelphia in points. Rather, the Cavaliers produced substantially more collective offense and controlled more possessions.
Paul George’s All-Around Contribution
Paul George recorded:
- 17 points
- 4 rebounds
- 4 assists
- -8 plus/minus
George was Philadelphia’s second-highest scorer, matching De’Andre Hunter’s 17 points for Cleveland.
His four assists also tied him for Philadelphia’s team-high in the supplied statistics.
However, his -8 plus/minus shows that his individual production did not translate into a positive scoring margin during his minutes.
This is a useful reminder when reading player statistics. Points alone do not explain the entire game. Rebounding, playmaking, shooting efficiency, turnovers, and plus/minus all provide different pieces of the story.
Tyrese Maxey’s Numbers
Tyrese Maxey finished with:
- 14 points
- 2 rebounds
- 4 assists
His four assists tied George and Trendon Watford for Philadelphia’s highest assist total in the supplied data.
Maxey’s 14 points were useful, but Philadelphia needed greater overall offensive efficiency to stay with Cleveland.
The 76ers’ 22 team assists were nearly half of Cleveland’s 41. That 19-assist difference is one of the most striking statistical indicators of the game.
Philadelphia’s Starting Lineup
The 76ers starters recorded the following numbers:
| 76ers Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Paul George | 17 | 4 | 4 |
| Dominick Barlow | 2 | 2 | Not listed |
| Joel Embiid | 20 | 4 | 3 |
| Tyrese Maxey | 14 | 2 | 4 |
| VJ Edgecombe | 9 | 3 | 2 |
Philadelphia’s starters combined for 62 points based on the supplied scoring totals.
That production was well below Cleveland’s starting group, which combined for 94 points.
The difference between the starting units was therefore one of the central reasons the Cavaliers built such a large advantage.
76ers Bench Production
Philadelphia’s bench included several contributors:
| 76ers Bench Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Trendon Watford | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Justin Edwards | 6 | Not listed | Not listed |
| Andre Drummond | 7 | 9 | Not listed |
| Adem Bona | 6 | 2 | Not listed |
| Kelly Oubre Jr. | 7 | 5 | Not listed |
| Quentin Grimes | 8 | 5 | Not listed |
| Jared McCain | 6 | Not listed | Not listed |
Andre Drummond’s nine rebounds were especially notable among the Philadelphia reserves.
Kelly Oubre Jr. and Quentin Grimes each collected five rebounds, while Watford provided four assists.
Philadelphia therefore had individual contributions from its bench, but Cleveland’s overall offensive output remained much stronger.
The Rebounding Battle
One of the simplest ways to understand this game is to look at the glass.
Cleveland: 52 rebounds
Philadelphia: 42 rebounds
That is a 10-rebound advantage for Cleveland.
Ten extra rebounds can have a major impact because rebounds determine who gets possession after missed shots.
Cleveland’s advantage was not limited to one player. Mobley led the Cavaliers with 13 rebounds, while Allen and Tyson each added five. Mitchell collected seven, and the bench also contributed.
Philadelphia received nine rebounds from Drummond and five each from Watford, Oubre, and Grimes, but the team still finished 10 rebounds behind.
The rebounding advantage supported Cleveland’s efficient offense by helping the Cavaliers maintain possession and limiting Philadelphia’s opportunities.
The Assist Gap Was Even More Important
The assist numbers provide another major explanation for the result.
Cleveland: 41 assists
Philadelphia: 22 assists
The difference was 19 assists.
That is an enormous team-play gap.
Cleveland’s 41 assists on 50 made field goals mean most of its made baskets were associated with an assist. The figure indicates a highly connected offensive performance.
Mitchell led the Cavaliers with nine assists. Garland followed with seven, while Mobley recorded six.
Hunter, Merrill, and other players also contributed to the team’s passing output.
Philadelphia did not have a single player reach five assists. George, Maxey, and Watford each recorded four.
This contrast suggests that Cleveland consistently created shots through ball movement, while Philadelphia generated considerably less assisted offense.
Shooting Efficiency Decided the Game
The shooting comparison is perhaps the most direct explanation for the 26-point final margin.
| Category | Cavaliers | 76ers |
| Field Goals | 50-95 | 36-89 |
| Field Goal % | 53% | 40% |
| 3-Pointers | 20-46 | 12-43 |
| 3PT % | 43% | 28% |
| Free Throws | 13-18 | 23-26 |
| FT % | 72% | 88% |
Philadelphia actually shot free throws better.
That did not matter enough because Cleveland created a much larger advantage in field goals and three-point shooting.
Cleveland made 14 more field goals overall.
It also made eight more three-pointers.
Philadelphia’s 23 made free throws compared with Cleveland’s 13 gave the 76ers a 10-point advantage at the line, but Cleveland’s field-goal and three-point advantages were much larger.
This is why looking at only free-throw percentage or raw scoring can be misleading. The full shot profile tells the story.
Cleveland’s Three-Point Advantage
The three-point difference deserves special attention.
Cleveland made:
20 of 46
Philadelphia made:
12 of 43
Cleveland therefore made eight more threes while attempting only three more.
The percentage difference was also substantial:
Cleveland: 43%
Philadelphia: 28%
This produced a 24-point advantage from made three-pointers.
For a team to win comfortably against a high-level opponent, it does not necessarily need to dominate every statistical category. Cleveland found an especially important advantage in perimeter efficiency and converted it into a large scoring margin.
Turnovers Tell a Different Story
Interestingly, turnovers did not favor Cleveland.
Cleveland committed:
15 turnovers
Philadelphia committed:
12 turnovers
The 76ers therefore had three fewer turnovers.
That means the Cavaliers did not win because Philadelphia repeatedly gave away possessions while Cleveland protected the ball perfectly.
Instead, Cleveland overcame its three-turnover disadvantage through better shooting, rebounding, passing, and overall offensive execution.
This distinction is important when evaluating team performance.
A simple narrative such as “Cleveland won because it took better care of the ball” would not fit the supplied data.
The numbers show something more nuanced: Philadelphia had slightly fewer turnovers, but Cleveland was substantially more effective with its shooting and ball movement.
The First Quarter Set the Tone
Cleveland opened the game with a 33-18 first quarter.
That 15-point advantage immediately placed Philadelphia under pressure.
The 76ers responded by winning the second quarter 29-27, but that only reduced Cleveland’s advantage by two points.
At halftime, Cleveland still had a 13-point lead.
The Cavaliers then scored 33 points in the third quarter while Philadelphia scored 28.
That restored and expanded the margin.
By the fourth quarter, Cleveland was firmly in control and scored 40 points, its highest total of the night.
The quarter-by-quarter numbers therefore show sustained offensive pressure rather than a single isolated run.
What the 133-107 Score Really Shows
A 133-107 score can tempt readers to focus only on the 26-point difference.
The deeper story is how Cleveland built that margin.
The Cavaliers combined:
- 53% field-goal shooting
- 43% three-point shooting
- 52 rebounds
- 41 assists
- 20 made three-pointers
- Five double-digit scorers among the starters
- Strong bench scoring
- A 15-point first-quarter advantage
Philadelphia had some positive numbers, including 88% free-throw shooting and fewer turnovers.
Those advantages were not enough to compensate for the difference in shot-making and offensive organization.
Player Comparison: Mitchell vs Embiid
The headline individual comparison naturally centers on Donovan Mitchell and Joel Embiid.
| Statistic | Donovan Mitchell | Joel Embiid |
| Points | 35 | 20 |
| Rebounds | 7 | 4 |
| Assists | 9 | 3 |
| Plus/Minus | +29 | Not listed |
Mitchell led Embiid in all three listed offensive and rebounding categories.
The scoring difference was 15 points.
The assist difference was six.
The rebound difference was three.
This does not mean one game establishes a permanent ranking between two players. It means Mitchell had the more productive statistical performance in this particular matchup.
Player Comparison: Garland vs Maxey
The backcourt comparison also favored Cleveland.
| Statistic | Darius Garland | Tyrese Maxey |
| Points | 20 | 14 |
| Rebounds | 3 | 2 |
| Assists | 7 | 4 |
Garland produced six more points and three more assists.
That difference contributed to Cleveland’s superior team passing numbers.
Maxey still contributed 14 points and four assists, but Philadelphia needed more efficient production from its primary perimeter creators.
Mobley’s Impact Beyond Scoring
Mobley’s 17 points may initially appear less impressive than Mitchell’s 35.
However, his full statistical line tells a broader story.
He had 13 rebounds and six assists.
That means he contributed directly in three major areas: scoring, rebounding, and playmaking.
His rebounding total was especially important because Cleveland finished with a 10-rebound team advantage.
For analysts, this is a useful example of why a box score should be read as a collection of connected indicators rather than a simple points leaderboard.
Why Cleveland’s Ball Movement Stands Out
Forty-one assists on 50 made field goals is an unusually strong relationship between passing and scoring.
It suggests Cleveland consistently created shots through teamwork.
Mitchell’s nine assists were particularly important because the Cavaliers’ leading scorer was also acting as a facilitator.
Garland’s seven assists and Mobley’s six added further distribution.
That creates a difficult defensive problem. If the defense focuses on Mitchell, another Cleveland player can benefit. If it collapses toward Mobley, Cleveland can find perimeter opportunities.
Philadelphia’s 22 assists indicate a much less productive passing night.
Plus/Minus Context
Donovan Mitchell’s +29 was the best plus/minus figure provided for Cleveland.
Paul George was Philadelphia’s plus/minus leader at -8, according to the supplied data.
This illustrates how dramatically the game moved in Cleveland’s favor during Mitchell’s minutes.
Plus/minus should not be treated as a standalone measure of individual quality. It is influenced by teammates, opponents, lineups, and game circumstances.
Still, when a player’s plus/minus aligns with strong scoring and playmaking numbers, it can reinforce the broader conclusion.
In Mitchell’s case, the +29 complements his 35-point, nine-assist performance.
What the Team Stats Say About Cleveland
The Cavaliers’ statistical profile points toward three main strengths.
Efficient Shooting
Cleveland shot 53% overall and 43% from three.
That gave the team a strong scoring base.
Collective Playmaking
The Cavaliers produced 41 assists.
The offense was therefore not dependent on one player.
Rebounding Control
Cleveland collected 52 rebounds.
That helped the Cavaliers maintain possession and restrict Philadelphia’s second-chance opportunities.
Together, those three elements formed a strong foundation for the 133-point performance.
What the Team Stats Say About Philadelphia
Philadelphia’s numbers reveal several areas that made the comeback difficult.
Low Field-Goal Efficiency
The 76ers shot only 40% from the field.
Poor Three-Point Shooting
Philadelphia converted 28% from three.
Limited Ball Movement
The team recorded only 22 assists.
Rebounding Deficit
Philadelphia lost the rebounding battle by 10.
The 76ers did shoot 88% from the free-throw line and committed only 12 turnovers, but those positives were not enough to offset the larger weaknesses.
The Most Important Numbers at a Glance
For readers who want the quickest statistical summary, these are the numbers that best explain the game:
- Final score: Cleveland 133, Philadelphia 107
- Point differential: Cleveland +26
- Cleveland field-goal percentage: 53%
- Philadelphia field-goal percentage: 40%
- Cleveland three-point percentage: 43%
- Philadelphia three-point percentage: 28%
- Cleveland rebounds: 52
- Philadelphia rebounds: 42
- Cleveland assists: 41
- Philadelphia assists: 22
- Cleveland turnovers: 15
- Philadelphia turnovers: 12
- Mitchell: 35 points, 7 rebounds, 9 assists
- Mobley: 17 points, 13 rebounds, 6 assists
- Garland: 20 points, 3 rebounds, 7 assists
- Embiid: 20 points, 4 rebounds, 3 assists
- George: 17 points, 4 rebounds, 4 assists
- Maxey: 14 points, 2 rebounds, 4 assists
The official NBA statistics platform provides player, team, box-score, advanced, shooting, and other statistical categories for deeper verification and comparison. NBA Official Stats
How to Read These Match Player Stats Properly
Readers often search for player stats because they want to know who played well.
The best approach is to avoid judging a player only by points.
A useful evaluation considers:
Scoring: How many points did the player produce?
Efficiency: How effectively did the player convert opportunities?
Rebounding: Did the player help control possession?
Playmaking: Did the player create opportunities for teammates?
Turnovers: How often did the player lose possessions?
Plus/minus: Did the team perform better or worse during the player’s minutes?
Team context: Did the player’s production contribute to winning basketball?
Using this framework, Mitchell’s performance becomes especially impressive because he was productive as both a scorer and creator.
Mobley’s performance stands out because his scoring was paired with elite rebounding and strong passing.
Garland’s contribution becomes more valuable when viewed alongside his seven assists.
The same principle applies to Philadelphia. Embiid’s 20 points show that he remained a major scorer, but the team’s overall efficiency was not enough.
Why the 26-Point Margin Matters
The final margin of 26 points is large enough that small statistical differences cannot fully explain it.
Cleveland was better in several major categories at the same time.
The Cavaliers:
- Shot 13 percentage points better from the field
- Shot 15 percentage points better from three
- Made eight more threes
- Grabbed 10 more rebounds
- Recorded 19 more assists
- Scored 26 more points
Philadelphia did have fewer turnovers and better free-throw shooting.
But those advantages were comparatively small against Cleveland’s overall offensive efficiency.
This is why the game should be viewed as a comprehensive Cleveland performance rather than simply a Mitchell scoring explosion.
Season Series Implication
After this game, Cleveland led the season series 2-0 according to the supplied data.
That gives the matchup additional context.
The Cavaliers had now won both meetings represented by the season-series figure, making this January result more than an isolated victory in the standings.
However, a season-series advantage should not be confused with a broader statement about playoff outcomes. Regular-season games can be influenced by lineups, injuries, rotations, schedule circumstances, and shooting variance.
The correct conclusion is narrower: Cleveland had established a 2-0 edge in the season series after this contest.
Attendance and Venue
The game was played at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Attendance was listed at 19,746.
The home setting did not prevent Cleveland from producing an efficient road performance.
The Cavaliers entered the contest with a 9-9 away record, while Philadelphia had a 10-10 home record.
Those records provide useful context because neither team entered with an overwhelming home or road advantage based on the supplied figures.
Game Officials
The officials listed for the contest were:
- Pat Fraher
- Eric Dalen
- Tyler Ricks
Including officiating information can be useful when preserving a complete game record, although the supplied player and team statistics are more directly relevant when evaluating the outcome.
What This Game Reveals About Winning Basketball
The biggest lesson from this matchup is that offensive efficiency becomes much harder to overcome when it is paired with rebounding and passing advantages.
Cleveland did not merely shoot well.
It shot well while also:
- Winning the rebound battle
- Producing almost twice as many assists
- Getting five starters into double figures
- Receiving significant bench scoring
- Maintaining strong scoring across all four quarters
That combination created a stable offensive performance.
Philadelphia’s 107 points would normally represent a substantial scoring total. Against Cleveland’s 133, however, it was not enough.
A Practical Framework for Comparing Future Games
When analyzing another Cavaliers or 76ers matchup, readers can use the same framework.
First, compare the final score and scoring margin.
Second, check field-goal percentage.
Third, examine three-point volume and accuracy.
Fourth, compare rebounds.
Fifth, compare assists.
Sixth, review turnovers.
Seventh, identify the top individual scorers.
Finally, examine whether the best individual performances translated into team success.
This process provides a much stronger analysis than simply copying a list of points and rebounds.
Cleveland Cavaliers vs 76ers Match Player Stats: Final Assessment
The cleveland cavaliers vs 76ers match player stats from January 15, 2026, point to a convincing Cleveland victory built on efficiency, teamwork, and control of possessions.
Donovan Mitchell was the standout performer with 35 points, 7 rebounds, and 9 assists. His +29 plus/minus was the best figure identified in Cleveland’s supplied statistics.
Evan Mobley provided a different kind of impact with 17 points, 13 rebounds, and 6 assists. Darius Garland added 20 points and seven assists, while De’Andre Hunter supplied 17 points from the bench.
Philadelphia was led by Joel Embiid’s 20 points, with Paul George scoring 17 and Tyrese Maxey adding 14. The 76ers also shot 88% from the free-throw line and committed only 12 turnovers, but those strengths could not offset their 40% field-goal shooting and 28% three-point shooting.
The clearest team-level difference was Cleveland’s ability to combine accurate shooting with superior ball movement. The Cavaliers made 20 three-pointers, collected 52 rebounds, and recorded 41 assists. Philadelphia made 12 threes, grabbed 42 rebounds, and recorded 22 assists.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring also shows that Cleveland controlled the game for most of the night. The Cavaliers built a 15-point first-quarter advantage, maintained their lead through the middle quarters, and finished with a 40-point fourth quarter.
In short, the 133-107 result was not explained by one statistic. It was the product of several advantages working together. Cleveland shot better, passed better, rebounded better, and received balanced scoring from its lineup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the Cavaliers vs 76ers game?
Donovan Mitchell was the game’s top scorer with 35 points for Cleveland. Joel Embiid led Philadelphia with 20 points.
What was the final score between Cleveland and Philadelphia?
The Cavaliers defeated the 76ers 133-107 on January 15, 2026, in Philadelphia.
How many points did Donovan Mitchell score?
Donovan Mitchell scored 35 points. He also recorded seven rebounds and nine assists.
How many rebounds did Evan Mobley have?
Evan Mobley collected 13 rebounds, the most for Cleveland. He also scored 17 points and recorded six assists.
How many assists did Cleveland have?
Cleveland recorded 41 assists, compared with 22 assists for Philadelphia.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
Cleveland shot 43% from three-point range, making 20 of 46 attempts. Philadelphia shot 28%, making 12 of 43 attempts.
Conclusion
The cleveland cavaliers vs 76ers match player stats provide a clear statistical picture of Cleveland’s 133-107 win.
Mitchell’s 35-point, nine-assist performance was the headline, but the victory was much broader than one player’s scoring. Mobley’s 13 rebounds and six assists, Garland’s seven assists, Hunter’s 17 bench points, and Cleveland’s 41 total assists all contributed to the result.
The Cavaliers also won the rebounding battle 52-42 and produced a major shooting advantage. Their 43% three-point shooting compared with Philadelphia’s 28% was particularly important, while the 53%-40% field-goal difference further separated the teams.
Philadelphia had some positive indicators, especially its 88% free-throw shooting and 12 turnovers. Yet the 76ers could not overcome the combined effect of inefficient field-goal shooting, poor three-point accuracy, fewer rebounds, and significantly fewer assists.
The final score therefore reflects a complete team performance from Cleveland. Mitchell supplied the star production, Mobley controlled the glass, Garland helped organize the offense, and the supporting cast provided enough scoring to keep Philadelphia from narrowing the gap.
For anyone studying this matchup, the most useful takeaway is simple: the box score becomes far more informative when individual numbers are connected to team efficiency, possession control, shooting quality, and playmaking.
