Cleveland Cavaliers vs Sacramento Kings Match Player Stats

The cleveland cavaliers vs sacramento kings match player stats from January 24, 2026, tell a much more interesting story than the five point final margin suggests. Cleveland defeated Sacramento 123-118 at Rocket Arena, but the game was competitive deep into the fourth quarter. Sacramento led 71-68 at halftime, Cleveland answered with a 34-point third quarter, and the Kings briefly moved ahead 114-113 with four minutes remaining. Donovan Mitchell then delivered the decisive scoring burst, while Evan Mobley produced one of his most complete performances of the night.

The date deserves a small clarification. ESPN’s U.S. game page labels the contest January 23, 2026, because the game was played Friday night in Cleveland. ESPN’s international page and the supplied data identify it as January 24, 2026. The underlying game, score, player statistics, and game ID are the same.

For readers searching for player-by-player production, this game is especially useful because the box score shows several different ways a player can influence a close NBA game. Mitchell led all scorers with 33 points and eight assists. Mobley added 29 points, 13 rebounds, seven assists and four blocks. On Sacramento’s side, Domantas Sabonis recorded 24 points, 16 rebounds and six assists after returning from a 25-game absence, while Dennis Schroder scored 21 and DeMar DeRozan added 20.

Cleveland Cavaliers vs Sacramento Kings Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The final score was Cleveland 123, Sacramento 118.

Cleveland entered the game 26-20 overall and 15-11 at home, while Sacramento was 12-34 overall and 3-18 on the road. The five-point result therefore fit the broader season context, but the actual game was considerably closer than those records might have suggested.

Final Score by Quarter

Quarter	Sacramento Kings	Cleveland Cavaliers
First	35	35
Second	36	33
Third	22	34
Fourth	25	21
Final	118	123

The first half belonged slightly to Sacramento. Both teams scored 35 in the opening quarter, and the Kings then produced 36 points in the second to take a 71-68 halftime advantage.

The turning point came in the third quarter. Cleveland scored 34 while holding Sacramento to 22. That 12-point swing effectively erased the Kings’ halftime advantage and gave Cleveland the platform it needed to survive a late Sacramento push.

The fourth quarter shows why simply looking at the final score can be misleading. Sacramento actually outscored Cleveland 25-21 in the final period, but the Cavaliers had already created enough separation during the third quarter to protect the lead.

Cleveland Cavaliers Player Statistics

Donovan Mitchell

Donovan Mitchell was Cleveland’s leading scorer with 33 points, five rebounds and eight assists in 34 minutes.

He shot 11 of 25 from the field, 5 of 12 from three-point range and 6 of 7 from the free-throw line. He also recorded one steal and committed one turnover. His plus/minus was +5.

The important point is that Mitchell’s value was not limited to his scoring total. Eight assists gave him a major role in Cleveland’s half-court creation, particularly when Sacramento’s defense tried to slow his scoring opportunities.

His late-game influence was even more significant. According to the game recap, Mitchell hit a three-pointer with 2:29 remaining after Sacramento had taken a 114-113 lead. That shot pushed Cleveland back in front 118-114 and became one of the defining moments of the contest.

Evan Mobley

Evan Mobley produced perhaps the most complete statistical line of the game.

He finished with:

• 29 points
• 13 rebounds
• 7 assists
• 4 blocks
• 13-of-24 shooting
• 3-of-5 free throws
• +17 plus/minus

Mobley’s 29 points matched his season high according to ESPN’s game recap. His 13 rebounds also made him Cleveland’s leading rebounder.

What stands out is the combination of scoring, rebounding, passing and rim protection. A 29-point performance is impressive on its own, but adding 13 rebounds, seven assists and four blocks gives the performance a much broader impact.

Mobley also helped Cleveland control the interior. The Cavaliers scored 52 points in the paint compared with 36 for Sacramento and blocked six shots to the Kings’ two.

Jaylon Tyson

Jaylon Tyson contributed 17 points, seven rebounds and four assists in 36 minutes.

He shot 6 of 14 from the field, made three of his five three-point attempts and added two free throws. His +20 plus/minus was one of the strongest marks among Cleveland players.

Tyson’s impact also showed up at the end. After Sacramento missed three consecutive three-point attempts during the final minute, Tyson scored a floater with 25.6 seconds remaining to help close the game.

That is an important lesson when evaluating player statistics. A player’s total points can explain overall offensive production, while timing and plus/minus can provide additional context about how that production affected the game.

Jarrett Allen

Jarrett Allen finished with 15 points and nine rebounds in 34 minutes.

He shot 3 of 6 from the field and made 9 of 10 free throws. Allen also contributed two steals and one block while posting a +7 plus/minus.

His free-throw efficiency was particularly useful. Sacramento shot an excellent 95 percent from the line as a team, so Cleveland needed efficient scoring opportunities of its own to prevent the Kings from gaining an advantage at the stripe.

Dean Wade

Dean Wade scored six points and grabbed five rebounds in 28 minutes.

He shot 2 of 4 from the field and made two of his four three-point attempts. He also recorded one steal and finished with a +21 plus/minus, the highest mark among Cleveland players.

The modest scoring total should not obscure his overall contribution. His plus/minus indicates that Cleveland’s lineups performed very well during his minutes, even though he was not a major offensive option.

Cleveland’s Bench

Cleveland’s bench production was more uneven.

De’Andre Hunter scored nine points in 19 minutes. Craig Porter Jr. had five points, five rebounds and three assists. Nae’Qwan Tomlin scored four points and added one rebound, one assist, one steal and one block. Larry Nance Jr. finished with two points and three rebounds, while Tyrese Proctor scored three points in four minutes.

One notable negative was Tomlin’s -27 plus/minus, although plus/minus should never be treated as an isolated measure of individual quality.

Sacramento Kings Player Statistics

Domantas Sabonis

Domantas Sabonis was Sacramento’s standout performer.

He recorded 24 points, 16 rebounds and six assists in 31 minutes while shooting an outstanding 9 of 14 from the field and 5 of 5 at the free-throw line. He also had one steal.

His return was particularly important because ESPN reported that Sabonis had recently returned after missing 25 games because of a knee injury.

From a statistical perspective, his 24-16-6 line was one of the strongest individual performances in the matchup. He gave Sacramento efficient scoring, elite rebounding and secondary playmaking from the frontcourt.

His +16 plus/minus was also Sacramento’s best among players who received significant minutes. That contrast is revealing because the Kings lost the game despite Sabonis having a highly productive night.

Dennis Schroder

Dennis Schroder scored 21 points, four rebounds and four assists in 31 minutes.

He shot 6 of 12 from the field, 3 of 5 from three-point range and 6 of 6 from the free-throw line. His +19 plus/minus was the best mark on the Sacramento roster.

Schroder was especially important during Sacramento’s second-quarter surge. The game recap noted that Schroder and Sabonis combined for 31 points as Sacramento took a 71-68 halftime lead.

DeMar DeRozan

DeMar DeRozan finished with 20 points, four rebounds and three assists.

He shot 6 of 12 from the field and 8 of 9 from the free-throw line. Despite his efficient scoring, his plus/minus was -24.

That number demonstrates why plus/minus needs context. DeRozan individually scored 20 points and shot 66.7 percent from the free-throw line, yet Sacramento’s overall performance during his minutes was outscored significantly.

Malik Monk

Malik Monk scored 16 points and produced seven assists in 33 minutes.

He shot 6 of 15 from the field and 4 of 9 from three-point range. He also had one rebound and one steal. His +17 plus/minus was among Sacramento’s strongest figures.

The seven assists were important because Sacramento needed more than individual scoring to compete with Cleveland’s multiple playmaking options.

Russell Westbrook

Russell Westbrook scored 11 points, five rebounds and three assists in 27 minutes.

He made 3 of 12 field-goal attempts, including 3 of 10 from three-point range, while making both of his free throws.

The shooting efficiency was the weaker part of his offensive line, but his five rebounds and three assists provided additional value.

Precious Achiuwa and Maxime Raynaud

Precious Achiuwa started and played 20 minutes, finishing with four points and eight rebounds. He shot 2 of 6 from the field.

Maxime Raynaud played nine minutes and finished scoreless, going 0 for 2 from the field.

Their offensive production was limited, but Achiuwa’s eight rebounds helped Sacramento maintain a competitive rebounding profile.

Cleveland vs Sacramento Team Statistics

The team numbers explain why Cleveland won despite Sacramento’s superior shooting percentages.

Statistic	Sacramento	Cleveland
Field Goals	42-89	44-96
Field Goal %	47%	46%
Three-Pointers	13-33	13-36
Three-Point %	39%	36%
Free Throws	21-22	22-27
Free-Throw %	95%	81%
Rebounds	43	48
Assists	26	23
Turnovers	11	6
Steals	5	6
Blocks	2	6

Sacramento actually shot better from the field, from three-point range and from the free-throw line. Yet Cleveland won.

That is the central statistical lesson from this game.

The Cavaliers generated more offensive rebounds, dominated points in the paint and protected the basketball better. ESPN’s team statistics show Cleveland collected 16 offensive rebounds compared with 10 for Sacramento, scored 52 points in the paint against 36, and scored only four points off turnovers while Sacramento gave up 15.

Those small advantages added up.

Why Cleveland Won Despite Sacramento’s Better Shooting

A box score can make this game look confusing at first.

Sacramento shot 47 percent compared with Cleveland’s 46 percent. The Kings also shot 39 percent from three and an exceptional 95 percent from the free-throw line.

So why did they lose?

1. Cleveland Controlled the Offensive Glass

The Cavaliers grabbed 16 offensive rebounds, six more than Sacramento.

Offensive rebounds create additional possessions. They also give a team opportunities to score even after an initial shot fails.

That advantage was especially important because Cleveland attempted 96 field goals compared with Sacramento’s 89.

2. Cleveland Won the Interior Battle

Cleveland scored 52 points in the paint.

Sacramento scored 36.

That 16-point difference shows that Cleveland was not dependent entirely on perimeter shooting. Even though the Cavaliers made the same number of three-pointers as Sacramento, they created much more offense around the basket.

Mobley and Allen were central to this approach.

3. Turnovers Favored Cleveland

Sacramento committed 11 turnovers, while Cleveland’s box score recorded six.

That difference gave Cleveland more control over possession quality and limited Sacramento’s ability to convert defensive pressure into transition opportunities. ESPN’s matchup statistics also show Sacramento scored 15 points off Cleveland turnovers, while Cleveland scored four points off Sacramento turnovers, so the turnover story is more nuanced than the raw totals alone suggest.

4. Cleveland’s Rim Protection Was Superior

The Cavaliers recorded six blocks compared with Sacramento’s two.

Mobley alone accounted for four blocks.

That defensive presence helped Cleveland protect the paint even while Sacramento shot efficiently from outside.

The Third Quarter Changed the Game

The third quarter is arguably the most important section of the game to study.

Sacramento entered halftime with a 71-68 advantage. Cleveland then scored 34 points while holding Sacramento to 22.

That created a 12-point swing in a single period.

The Cavaliers did not simply win because Mitchell scored 33 points. They won because their third-quarter defense and interior offense changed the game environment.

This is one of the most useful insights for anyone researching cleveland cavaliers vs sacramento kings match player stats. Looking only at the final scoring leaders misses the sequence that produced the win.

The Fourth-Quarter Pressure

Sacramento did not collapse after falling behind.

The Kings outscored Cleveland 25-21 in the fourth and eventually took a 114-113 lead with four minutes remaining.

That makes Mitchell’s late three even more significant.

The Cavaliers needed a shot creator who could generate offense without requiring a complicated possession. Mitchell supplied that answer.

Sacramento then had opportunities to respond but missed three consecutive three-point attempts during the final minute. Tyson’s floater with 25.6 seconds remaining helped Cleveland finish the job.

The Most Important Individual Matchup

The most interesting statistical contrast was between Donovan Mitchell and Domantas Sabonis.

Mitchell:

• 33 points
• 5 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 11-of-25 shooting
• 5-of-12 from three
• +5

Sabonis:

• 24 points
• 16 rebounds
• 6 assists
• 9-of-14 shooting
• 5-of-5 free throws
• +16

Sabonis was more efficient and controlled the glass. Mitchell generated more scoring volume and created more assists.

The game ultimately rewarded Cleveland’s combination of Mitchell’s perimeter shot creation and Mobley’s interior production.

Evan Mobley’s All-Around Impact

Mobley’s performance deserves special attention because his numbers cover almost every major category.

He scored 29 points, grabbed 13 rebounds, handed out seven assists and blocked four shots.

That is the type of performance that can change the structure of a game.

If Sacramento focused too heavily on Mitchell, Mobley could score. If Sacramento challenged Cleveland around the rim, Mobley’s passing became valuable. And, if the Kings attacked the paint, Mobley provided rim protection.</p>

His seven assists also helped Cleveland avoid becoming overly dependent on one scorer.

What the Plus/Minus Numbers Tell Us

Plus/minus should not be treated as a perfect player rating, but in a single-game analysis it can help identify which lineups were successful.

Cleveland’s notable plus/minus figures included:

• Dean Wade: +21
• Jaylon Tyson: +20
• Evan Mobley: +17
• Jarrett Allen: +7
• Donovan Mitchell: +5

Sacramento’s notable figures included:

• Dennis Schroder: +19
• Malik Monk: +17
• Domantas Sabonis: +16
• Dylan Cardwell: +10
• DeMar DeRozan: -24

These numbers reveal an important contrast. Sacramento had several productive individual stretches, but Cleveland’s most important starters generally produced positive on-court margins.

Shooting Efficiency Versus Shot Volume

One of the clearest analytical lessons from the game is the difference between efficiency and volume.

Sacramento made 42 of 89 field-goal attempts.

Cleveland made 44 of 96.

The Kings therefore had the better field-goal percentage, but Cleveland took seven more attempts and made two more shots.

The Cavaliers also created more offensive rebounds, which contributed to additional attempts.

This is why field-goal percentage alone cannot explain the result.

Free-Throw Shooting

Sacramento was outstanding at the free-throw line.

The Kings made 21 of 22, or 95 percent.

Cleveland made 22 of 27, or 81 percent.

From a pure efficiency standpoint, Sacramento clearly had the advantage.

Yet Cleveland still won because it generated enough additional possessions and interior scoring to overcome that weakness.

For player analysis, Allen’s 9-of-10 free-throw performance was especially important.

Three-Point Shooting

Both teams made 13 three-pointers.

Sacramento shot 13 of 33, or 39 percent.

Cleveland shot 13 of 36, or 36 percent.

Mitchell led Cleveland’s perimeter scoring with five made threes, while Jaylon Tyson made three. For Sacramento, Malik Monk made four and Dennis Schroder made three.

The three-point battle was therefore relatively balanced. Cleveland’s decisive advantage came from other areas.

Rebounding Battle

Cleveland won the overall rebounding battle 48-43.

More importantly, Cleveland won offensive rebounds 16-10.

Mobley led the Cavaliers with 13 rebounds.

Sabonis led Sacramento with 16.

This was an unusual game in which Sacramento had the best individual rebounder but Cleveland still won the overall rebounding battle.

That distinction matters because team rebounding depends on contributions from every position.

What These Player Stats Reveal About Team Identity

The numbers suggest two different offensive profiles.

Sacramento relied heavily on efficient individual scoring and playmaking from Sabonis, Schroder, DeRozan and Monk.

Cleveland had a more diversified scoring structure. Mitchell provided perimeter creation, Mobley supplied interior scoring and playmaking, Allen contributed efficient interior finishing and free throws, while Tyson added 17 points.

That diversity helped Cleveland withstand Sacramento’s efficient shooting.

A Practical Way to Read This Box Score

If you are researching player statistics for fantasy analysis, historical comparison or matchup evaluation, do not start with points alone.

A better process is:

1. Identify the leading scorers.
2. Check shooting efficiency.
3. Look at rebounds and offensive rebounds.
4. Review assists and turnovers.
5. Compare three-point and free-throw production.
6. Examine blocks and steals.
7. Review plus/minus for lineup context.
8. Check the quarter-by-quarter scoring.
9. Identify late-game possessions.
10. Compare the statistical profile with the final result.

Using that method, this game becomes much easier to understand.

Mitchell was the primary scorer and late-game closer. Mobley was the all-around frontcourt engine. Sabonis was Sacramento’s most efficient and productive player. Schroder provided valuable secondary scoring. Cleveland’s rebounding, paint scoring and ball security ultimately outweighed Sacramento’s superior shooting percentages.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most in the Cavaliers vs Kings game?

Donovan Mitchell led all players with 33 points for Cleveland. Evan Mobley followed with 29 points, while Domantas Sabonis led Sacramento with 24.

Who had the most rebounds?

Domantas Sabonis had the most individual rebounds with 16, while Evan Mobley led Cleveland with 13.

Who led the Cavaliers in assists?

Donovan Mitchell led Cleveland with eight assists. Evan Mobley was second with seven.

Who led the Kings in assists?

Domantas Sabonis led Sacramento with six assists. Malik Monk and Dennis Schroder each recorded four.

What was the final score?

The Cleveland Cavaliers defeated the Sacramento Kings 123-118. Cleveland led the season series 1-0 after this game.

Why did Cleveland win despite Sacramento shooting better?

Cleveland compensated for Sacramento’s better shooting percentage by winning the rebounding battle, producing 16 offensive rebounds, scoring 52 points in the paint and recording six blocks. The Cavaliers also committed fewer turnovers in the box score.

Conclusion

The cleveland cavaliers vs sacramento kings match player stats show a game decided by more than the headline scoring totals.

Donovan Mitchell’s 33 points provided Cleveland with the primary scoring punch, while Evan Mobley’s 29 points, 13 rebounds, seven assists and four blocks gave the Cavaliers exceptional two-way production. Jaylon Tyson added 17 points and made an important late floater, while Jarrett Allen supplied efficient scoring and nine rebounds.

Sacramento had its own standout performances. Domantas Sabonis returned with 24 points, 16 rebounds and six assists, Dennis Schroder scored 21, and DeMar DeRozan added 20. The Kings also shot 47 percent from the field, 39 percent from three and 95 percent from the free-throw line.

Yet Cleveland found the areas that mattered most to the final result. The Cavaliers controlled offensive rebounding, won the overall glass, produced 52 points in the paint, blocked six shots and survived Sacramento’s fourth-quarter comeback.

The biggest analytical takeaway is that shooting percentage does not always determine the winner. Possession volume, offensive rebounds, interior scoring, rim protection and late-game shot creation can collectively outweigh a modest efficiency disadvantage.

For anyone examining cleveland cavaliers vs sacramento kings match player stats, this game is therefore a useful example of how individual box-score numbers fit into the larger tactical story of an NBA contest.