Indiana Fever vs Dallas Wings Match Player Stats

The indiana fever vs dallas wings match player stats from the WNBA preseason meeting on May 1, 2026, tell a much richer story than the final score alone. Dallas Wings secured an impressive 95 to 80 victory over the Indiana Fever at Gainbridge Fieldhouse, but the individual performances, shooting efficiency, rebounding dominance, and defensive execution reveal exactly why the game unfolded the way it did. While preseason results should always be viewed with context, this contest provided valuable insight into player chemistry, rotation decisions, and which athletes appear ready for the regular season.

Fans searching for detailed statistics often want more than a box score. They want to understand which players influenced momentum, how the teams compared statistically, and what these performances might indicate for future games. This breakdown focuses on those deeper insights while remaining grounded in the official game statistics.

Match Overview

Match Details	Information
Game	Dallas Wings vs Indiana Fever
League	WNBA Preseason
Date	May 1, 2026
Venue	Gainbridge Fieldhouse, Indianapolis
Attendance	11,745
Final Score	Dallas Wings 95, Indiana Fever 80
Winner	Dallas Wings
Winning Margin	15 Points
Broadcast	ION

Dallas improved to 1 and 0 in preseason play, while Indiana moved to 1 and 1. Although preseason records rarely define a season, this game highlighted several encouraging trends for Dallas and several areas requiring improvement for Indiana.

One of the biggest observations from watching the statistical flow of this contest is how quickly momentum shifted during the second quarter. Indiana controlled the opening period, but Dallas completely transformed the game over the next twelve minutes through efficient shooting, better ball movement, and stronger rebounding.

Final Score by Quarter

Quarter	Dallas Wings	Indiana Fever
First	25	29
Second	36	17
Third	17	20
Fourth	17	14
Final	95	80

Indiana actually entered the second quarter with confidence after scoring 29 opening points. However, Dallas answered with one of the strongest quarters of the preseason, outscoring the Fever 36 to 17.

That nineteen point swing effectively decided the outcome.

Game Summary

Dallas produced a complete team performance rather than relying on a single superstar.

Several players contributed in different ways.

• Five players scored at least eight points.
• Three players finished in double figures.
• Multiple reserves provided meaningful production.
• Ball movement created high percentage shots.
• Rebounding consistently generated second chance opportunities.

Indiana, meanwhile, received another productive scoring performance from Caitlin Clark, but the supporting cast struggled to maintain offensive efficiency throughout the game.

Team Statistics Comparison

Category	Dallas Wings	Indiana Fever
Points	95	80
Field Goals	36 of 70	24 of 60
Field Goal Percentage	51%	40%
Three Pointers	8 of 23	4 of 23
Three Point Percentage	35%	17%
Free Throws	15 of 17	28 of 42
Free Throw Percentage	88%	67%
Total Rebounds	45	26
Offensive Rebounds	12	5
Defensive Rebounds	33	21
Assists	25	15
Steals	11	10
Blocks	1	3
Turnovers	22	17

Several numbers immediately stand out.

Dallas shot above fifty percent from the field while Indiana remained at forty percent.

Even more significant was the rebounding battle. Winning the boards by nineteen rebounds allowed Dallas to create additional possessions while limiting Indiana’s second chance opportunities.

The assist numbers also reveal how effectively Dallas shared the basketball. Twenty five assists on thirty six made field goals reflect excellent offensive chemistry, particularly for a preseason contest where rotations are constantly changing.

Why Dallas Won

Looking beyond the score, four major factors determined the outcome.

Outstanding Shooting Efficiency

Dallas converted more than half of its field goal attempts.

That level of efficiency is difficult for any opponent to overcome.

Indiana struggled particularly from three point range, making only four of twenty three attempts.

Dominant Rebounding

The Wings collected 45 rebounds compared to Indiana’s 26.

This difference repeatedly extended Dallas possessions while preventing Indiana from establishing transition opportunities.

Better Offensive Ball Movement

Dallas finished with 25 assists, showing consistent willingness to find the open player instead of forcing contested shots.

The passing numbers reflected an offence operating with confidence despite preseason experimentation.

Bench Production

Dallas received valuable contributions throughout the roster.

Rather than depending on one or two scorers, multiple reserves delivered meaningful minutes that helped maintain intensity throughout the game.

Indiana Fever vs Dallas Wings Match Player Stats Leaders

The indiana fever vs dallas wings match player stats featured impressive individual performances from both teams.

Dallas Wings Leaders

Category	Player	Performance
Points	Paige Bueckers	20
Rebounds	Maddy Siegrist	11
Assists	Alanna Smith	5
Best Plus Minus	Aziaha James	+19
Most Steals	Aziaha James	4

Indiana Fever Leaders

Category	Player	Performance
Points	Caitlin Clark	21
Rebounds	Myisha Hines Allen	7
Assists	Raven Johnson	5
Best Plus Minus	Kayana Traylor	+8
Most Steals	Raven Johnson	5

These leaders illustrate an interesting contrast.

Indiana’s standout performers excelled individually, while Dallas consistently received production across nearly every position.

Dallas Wings Player Statistics Analysis

Paige Bueckers

20 Points
8 of 12 Field Goals
4 of 6 Three Pointers
3 Assists
2 Rebounds

Paige Bueckers delivered arguably the most polished offensive performance of the evening.

Scoring twenty points in only twenty minutes demonstrates remarkable efficiency.

Her shooting percentage stood out because she created offence in multiple ways.

She attacked inside when defenders closed out aggressively while confidently knocking down four three pointers.

Perhaps the most encouraging aspect of her performance was shot selection.

Rather than forcing difficult attempts, Bueckers consistently took quality looks generated through offensive movement.

For a preseason appearance, this performance suggests she entered camp in outstanding rhythm.

Maddy Siegrist

18 Points
11 Rebounds
7 of 13 Shooting

Siegrist produced one of the game’s most complete double doubles.

Her eleven rebounds helped Dallas completely control the glass.

Offensively, she displayed patience around the basket while converting efficient scoring opportunities.

Defensively, she boxed out consistently, limiting Indiana’s second chance opportunities throughout the contest.

Her contribution extended well beyond scoring.

She influenced nearly every possession through physical play and relentless effort.

Aziaha James

17 Points
7 Rebounds
3 Assists
4 Steals
Plus 19

James filled virtually every section of the stat sheet.

Although she struggled from long distance, missing all five three point attempts, she compensated through aggressive drives and perfect free throw shooting, converting all seven attempts.

Her four steals reflected outstanding defensive anticipation.

Even more impressive was her game leading plus nineteen rating, indicating Dallas consistently outperformed Indiana whenever she remained on the floor.

Alanna Smith

Smith’s statistics may appear modest at first glance.

Five points rarely attract headlines.

However, five assists and four rebounds while shooting efficiently illustrate her balanced contribution.

She served as an important facilitator within Dallas’ offensive structure.

Her passing frequently initiated scoring opportunities that never appear fully in traditional box scores.

Odyssey Sims

Sims quietly produced one of the most efficient performances of the night.

She scored nine points on a perfect four for four shooting performance while adding four assists without committing a turnover.

Veteran decision making like this often stabilises preseason rotations.

Her ability to create offence without wasting possessions helped Dallas maintain momentum during key stretches.

More Dallas Wings Player Statistics Breakdown

Dulcy Fankam Mendjiadeu

8 Points
3 Rebounds
1 Assist
4 of 7 Shooting

Dulcy Fankam Mendjiadeu provided productive interior scoring during her 12 minutes on the court. She attacked the paint efficiently, converting four of her seven field-goal attempts and giving Dallas another dependable option around the basket.

While she committed five personal fouls, her physical style helped the Wings maintain their rebounding advantage. Her willingness to battle inside also created space for perimeter shooters, an element that rarely appears in traditional box scores but has a significant impact on offensive flow.

Li Yueru

8 Points
8 Rebounds
2 Assists

Li Yueru quietly delivered one of the strongest rebounding performances of the game.

Five offensive rebounds demonstrated excellent positioning and persistence around the rim. Every extra possession created additional scoring opportunities for Dallas, helping maintain offensive pressure throughout the contest.

Although she committed three turnovers, her overall impact remained positive because of her dominance on the glass and efficient finishing near the basket.

Grace Berger

3 Points
2 Rebounds
3 Assists

Grace Berger embraced the role of secondary playmaker.

Rather than forcing shots, she focused on moving the basketball and making quick decisions. Her three assists without committing a turnover reflected smart ball security and effective court vision.

Performances like this often earn valuable rotation minutes because coaches place a premium on players who consistently make sound decisions.

Lindsay Allen

Allen finished with three points and two assists in limited action.

Her experience helped organise the offence whenever she handled the ball, and she maintained good offensive spacing despite seeing only fourteen minutes.

Alysha Clark

Although Clark did not score, her contribution extended beyond the scoring column.

She collected three rebounds, added one assist and recorded two steals in only seven minutes.

Veteran players frequently influence games through defence, communication and leadership rather than scoring alone, and Clark’s performance reflected exactly that.

Amy Okonkwo

Okonkwo did not score during her ten minutes but remained active defensively.

She grabbed two rebounds, forced a steal and competed well inside despite struggling with her shooting.

Preseason contests often provide opportunities for role players to showcase defensive effort even when offensive production is limited.

Azzi Fudd

Fudd experienced a difficult shooting night.

She scored four points while making two of seven field-goal attempts and missed both three-point attempts.

Although the offensive numbers were below expectations, preseason games frequently involve players adjusting to new teammates, offensive systems and game rhythm. One outing rarely defines future performance.

Dallas Wings Team Performance Analysis

Dallas produced one of the most balanced offensive displays seen during the early preseason.

Rather than depending entirely on one scorer, the Wings attacked Indiana from multiple areas of the floor.

Several statistical categories explain their success.

Efficient Shot Selection

Dallas finished the game shooting 36 of 70 from the field, an outstanding 51 percent.

This efficiency resulted from patient offensive possessions instead of rushed attempts.

Many baskets came after multiple passes, forcing Indiana’s defence to rotate before the final shot.

Three Point Efficiency

The Wings connected on 8 of 23 attempts from beyond the arc.

While thirty five percent is not extraordinary, it was more than enough considering Indiana converted only four three-pointers during the entire game.

Paige Bueckers and Maddy Siegrist stretched the floor effectively, preventing Indiana from collapsing into the paint.

Ball Movement

Twenty five assists represent one of the strongest indicators of Dallas’ offensive chemistry.

Several players shared ball-handling responsibilities, making the offence difficult to defend.

Instead of relying on isolation basketball, Dallas consistently generated open looks through movement and quick passing.

Rebounding Dominance

Perhaps the most decisive statistical advantage came on the boards.

Rebounding Category	Dallas	Indiana
Offensive Rebounds	12	5
Defensive Rebounds	33	21
Total Rebounds	45	26

Winning the rebounding battle by nineteen boards created a substantial possession advantage.

Offensive rebounds repeatedly extended scoring opportunities, while defensive rebounds prevented Indiana from building momentum.

Defensive Performance

Although Dallas committed twenty two turnovers, their defence prevented those mistakes from becoming costly.

The Wings recorded:

• 11 steals
• Consistent ball pressure
• Active help defence
• Strong defensive rebounding
• Effective transition defence

Aziaha James led the defensive effort with four steals, while several teammates consistently disrupted passing lanes.

The collective defensive activity prevented Indiana from finding offensive rhythm after the opening quarter.

Statistical Turning Point

Every basketball game features one period that ultimately shapes the outcome.

For this matchup, the decisive stretch came during the second quarter.

Quarter	Dallas	Indiana
Second Quarter	36	17

Dallas nearly doubled Indiana’s production during those twelve minutes.

Several factors combined to create this swing.

First, the Wings improved their defensive intensity and forced more difficult shots.

Second, efficient shooting allowed Dallas to score quickly without sacrificing shot quality.

Finally, rebounding prevented Indiana from generating second-chance points while giving Dallas additional possessions.

By halftime, the momentum had shifted completely.

Advanced Statistical Insights

Traditional box scores explain what happened.

Advanced interpretation helps explain why it happened.

Shooting Efficiency

Dallas converted fifty one percent of its field goals compared with Indiana’s forty percent.

That eleven percent difference translated into twelve additional made baskets despite only ten more shot attempts.

Possession Control

Although Dallas committed more turnovers, their rebounding advantage largely offset those mistakes.

Winning the rebound battle by nineteen meant significantly more scoring opportunities across forty minutes.

Bench Impact

One noticeable takeaway from this preseason contest was Dallas’ depth.

Reserve players consistently entered the game without a significant drop in production.

That level of depth becomes increasingly valuable during the regular season, where injuries, travel and schedule congestion often test roster flexibility.

Players Who Exceeded Expectations

Several Dallas players produced performances that stood above preseason expectations.

Paige Bueckers

Twenty points in only twenty minutes demonstrated elite offensive efficiency.

Maddy Siegrist

Her double-double showcased both scoring ability and rebounding consistency.

Aziaha James

Her defensive activity, free-throw accuracy and overall plus-minus reflected an outstanding all-around performance.

Li Yueru

Eight rebounds, including five offensive boards, highlighted her importance in controlling the paint.

What Dallas Can Build On

Although the result was encouraging, the statistics also identify areas for improvement before the regular season begins.

Dallas should focus on:

• Reducing turnovers after finishing with twenty two.
• Limiting unnecessary personal fouls.
• Continuing to improve three-point consistency.
• Maintaining the excellent ball movement displayed throughout this game.

If the Wings continue combining efficient shooting with dominant rebounding, they will be difficult opponents throughout the regular season.

Indiana Fever Player Statistics Analysis

While the final score favoured Dallas, Indiana still produced several encouraging individual performances. The box score shows flashes of offensive quality, energetic defensive play and promising depth. At the same time, the statistics highlight why the Fever struggled to keep pace after a strong opening quarter.

The biggest challenges were shooting efficiency, rebounding and perimeter scoring. These three areas ultimately prevented Indiana from mounting a comeback.

Caitlin Clark

21 Points
4 of 6 Field Goals
2 of 3 Three Pointers
11 of 13 Free Throws
4 Assists
2 Rebounds

Caitlin Clark finished as Indiana’s leading scorer with 21 points, making her the highest scorer of the entire game.

Her shooting efficiency was excellent. Converting four of six field-goal attempts while shooting two of three from beyond the arc demonstrates disciplined shot selection rather than high-volume shooting.

One of the most impressive parts of her performance was her ability to draw fouls. Clark attempted thirteen free throws and converted eleven, showing composure at the line and an aggressive attacking mindset.

Although she played only sixteen minutes because of preseason rotation management, she still produced elite offensive numbers. Her four assists also reflected solid playmaking, even though the team’s overall shooting limited the number of potential assists she could record.

From an analytical perspective, Clark’s performance was one of the brightest positives for Indiana despite the defeat.

Myisha Hines-Allen

7 Points
7 Rebounds
1 Assist

Myisha Hines-Allen led Indiana on the boards with seven rebounds.

She also shot efficiently, making two of her three field-goal attempts while contributing on both ends of the floor.

Although her scoring total was modest, her rebounding effort helped limit some of Dallas’ interior opportunities during her seventeen minutes on the court.

Indiana will likely value this type of balanced contribution throughout the regular season because rebounding remains one of the team’s key improvement areas.

Makayla Timpson

11 Points
2 Rebounds
1 Block

Makayla Timpson delivered one of the most efficient performances among Indiana’s frontcourt players.

She converted three of four field-goal attempts and added five made free throws to finish with eleven points.

Her activity around the basket created consistent pressure on the Dallas defence, while her defensive block demonstrated good timing and awareness.

Considering her limited minutes, Timpson made a strong case for additional opportunities in future games.

Kelsey Mitchell

10 Points
4 of 12 Shooting

Kelsey Mitchell experienced an inconsistent offensive outing.

Although she reached double figures with ten points, she struggled to find her shooting rhythm from long distance, missing all four three-point attempts.

Mitchell remains one of Indiana’s most reliable scorers, so this performance should be viewed within the context of preseason experimentation rather than as an indicator of long-term form.

Raven Johnson

3 Points
5 Assists
5 Steals

Raven Johnson’s box score illustrates that scoring is not the only measure of influence.

She finished with a team-high five assists while also recording five steals, the highest total by any player in the game.

Her defensive anticipation consistently disrupted passing lanes, and her playmaking helped organise Indiana’s offence during several possessions.

If she continues producing this level of defensive activity, she could become one of the Fever’s most valuable perimeter defenders.

Kayana Traylor

8 Points
2 of 3 Three Pointers

Kayana Traylor made excellent use of her eleven minutes.

She scored eight points while shooting efficiently from both the field and beyond the arc.

Her plus eight rating was Indiana’s best plus-minus figure, suggesting the team performed more effectively during her time on the floor.

Although preseason plus-minus should never be viewed in isolation, it provides useful context when evaluating player impact.

Shatori Walker-Kimbrough

Walker-Kimbrough contributed across several statistical categories.

She finished with:

• 7 points
• 4 assists
• 2 steals
• 1 block

Her versatility stood out more than any single statistic. She defended multiple positions, created opportunities for teammates and remained active throughout her twenty minutes.

Damiris Dantas

Damiris Dantas experienced a difficult shooting night.

She scored seven points but made only two of eleven field-goal attempts and missed all eight three-point attempts.

Despite those struggles, she still contributed five rebounds and continued competing defensively.

Veteran players often use preseason games to regain rhythm, making shooting percentages less concerning than they would be during the regular season.

Monique Billings

Billings contributed primarily through defensive effort.

She collected three rebounds and played physical basketball despite finishing with only two points.

Her willingness to battle inside helped Indiana remain competitive during stretches when offence became difficult to generate.

Sophie Cunningham

Cunningham saw limited action and attempted no field goals.

Although she scored only one point from the free-throw line, preseason coaching staffs frequently use restricted minutes to evaluate different lineup combinations.

Megan McConnell

McConnell played nine minutes and focused largely on defensive responsibilities.

She added two rebounds and one block while continuing to pressure Dallas ball handlers whenever she entered the game.

Jessica Timmons

Timmons finished with three points during eleven minutes.

While her offensive opportunities were limited, she remained active defensively and competed well against Dallas’ second unit.

Indiana Fever Team Performance Analysis

Indiana’s overall statistics reveal a team that started confidently before gradually losing control of the game’s key areas.

Several categories explain why the Fever struggled despite receiving strong individual performances.

Shooting Efficiency

Indiana finished:

• 24 of 60 from the field
• 40 percent field-goal shooting
• 4 of 23 from three-point range
• 67 percent from the free-throw line

The biggest concern was perimeter shooting.

Converting only four three-pointers on twenty-three attempts allowed Dallas to defend the paint more aggressively.

Improving outside shooting will naturally create more driving lanes and offensive balance.

Rebounding

The Fever collected only twenty-six rebounds compared with Dallas’ forty-five.

This nineteen-rebound difference became one of the game’s defining statistics.

Second-chance opportunities consistently favoured Dallas, while Indiana struggled to secure defensive rebounds during critical stretches.

Ball Movement

Indiana recorded fifteen assists.

Although several possessions featured good passing, the overall assist total reflected the team’s shooting struggles.

Open looks were created, but too many of those opportunities failed to result in made baskets.

Defensive Activity

One encouraging takeaway was Indiana’s defensive energy.

The Fever recorded:

• 10 steals
• 3 blocked shots
• Active perimeter pressure
• Consistent effort forcing difficult passes

Raven Johnson’s five steals highlighted this aggressive defensive approach.

Statistical Areas That Need Improvement

The box score clearly identifies several priorities before the regular season begins.

Improve Three Point Accuracy

Shooting just seventeen percent from beyond the arc made it difficult to keep pace with Dallas.

Finding greater consistency from long distance will improve overall offensive spacing.

Win More Rebounding Battles

Allowing forty-five rebounds significantly reduced Indiana’s chances of controlling the game.

Better boxing out and stronger team rebounding should become an important focus.

Convert Free Throws More Efficiently

Although Indiana attempted forty-two free throws, they converted only twenty-eight.

Missing fourteen free throws represents a substantial number of lost points in any game.

Maintain Offensive Rhythm

Indiana scored twenty-nine points in the opening quarter before managing only fifty-one across the final three quarters combined.

Developing greater offensive consistency will help prevent similar scoring droughts.

What This Game Means Going Forward

Because this was a preseason contest, the result should not be overinterpreted.

Instead, the statistics provide valuable insight into roster development, player roles and areas for improvement.

For Dallas, the game demonstrated impressive roster depth, efficient shooting and excellent ball movement.

For Indiana, it highlighted the scoring ability of Caitlin Clark, promising performances from younger contributors and the importance of improving rebounding and perimeter efficiency before the regular season begins.

The indiana fever vs dallas wings match player stats show that both teams left the court with meaningful lessons despite the one-sided final score.

Key Takeaways from the Match

The indiana fever vs dallas wings match player stats provide several meaningful insights beyond the final score. While preseason games are primarily used to evaluate lineups and build chemistry, this matchup still revealed strengths and weaknesses that could influence both teams heading into the regular season.

Dallas demonstrated excellent offensive balance, efficient shooting, and outstanding rebounding. Multiple players contributed on both ends of the floor, making the Wings difficult to defend throughout the game.

Indiana showed promising individual performances, particularly from Caitlin Clark, but struggled with consistency after a strong opening quarter. Improving three-point shooting, rebounding, and offensive efficiency will be key priorities moving forward.

Some of the biggest takeaways include:

• Dallas shot 51% from the field compared to Indiana’s 40%.
• The Wings won the rebounding battle by a margin of 45 to 26.
• Paige Bueckers scored 20 points in just 20 minutes with outstanding efficiency.
• Caitlin Clark led all scorers with 21 points despite playing only 16 minutes.
• Dallas recorded 25 assists, reflecting strong ball movement and offensive chemistry.
• Indiana’s 17% three-point shooting made it difficult to keep pace offensively.
• The second quarter proved decisive, with Dallas outscoring Indiana 36 to 17.

These statistics reinforce how important efficiency and rebounding are, even during preseason competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Dallas Wings vs Indiana Fever preseason game?

The Dallas Wings defeated the Indiana Fever 95 to 80 on May 1, 2026, at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis.

Who scored the most points in the game?

Caitlin Clark led all scorers with 21 points for the Indiana Fever, while Paige Bueckers scored 20 points to lead the Dallas Wings.

Which player had the most rebounds?

Maddy Siegrist led all players with 11 rebounds for Dallas. Myisha Hines-Allen was Indiana’s leading rebounder with seven.

Why did the Dallas Wings win?

Dallas won because of superior shooting efficiency, dominant rebounding, balanced scoring, and excellent ball movement. The Wings also outscored Indiana by 19 points during the second quarter, creating a lead they never surrendered.

What was the biggest statistical difference between the teams?

The largest statistical advantage came in rebounding. Dallas collected 45 rebounds while Indiana finished with only 26, giving the Wings numerous second-chance opportunities.

Was this a regular season game?

No. This was a WNBA preseason game played on May 1, 2026. Although the result does not affect the regular-season standings, it offered valuable insight into player development and team preparation.

Conclusion

The indiana fever vs dallas wings match player stats illustrate why analysing a basketball game requires more than looking at the final score. Dallas combined efficient shooting, disciplined ball movement, and dominant rebounding to secure a convincing 95 to 80 victory. Contributions from Paige Bueckers, Maddy Siegrist, Aziaha James, and several role players highlighted the depth of the Wings’ roster and their ability to execute consistently across four quarters.

Indiana, despite the loss, had encouraging performances to build upon. Caitlin Clark once again showcased her scoring efficiency and offensive leadership, while players such as Makayla Timpson, Raven Johnson, and Myisha Hines-Allen made positive contributions in their respective roles. The Fever’s primary challenges came in perimeter shooting, rebounding, and maintaining offensive rhythm after a strong first quarter.

Overall, this preseason contest provided a useful benchmark for both teams. Dallas displayed the qualities of a well-balanced roster capable of producing from multiple positions, while Indiana identified clear areas that can be refined before the regular season begins. For fans, coaches, and analysts alike, the statistics from this game offer valuable context that extends far beyond the final result.