Minnesota Lynx vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats

The minnesota lynx vs indiana fever match player stats from August 2, 2026, tell the story of a high-scoring WNBA contest in which the Minnesota Lynx defeated the Indiana Fever 108-100 at Target Center in Minneapolis. The final score alone does not explain why Minnesota controlled the game, however. A closer look at the player performances, shooting efficiency, rebounding, ball security, and playmaking shows several important differences between the two teams.

Minnesota finished the game shooting 43-of-76 from the field, while Indiana made 39-of-68. Both teams shot 57 percent overall, making the statistical battle more interesting than the final margin suggests. The biggest separation came in areas such as rebounding, offensive rebounds, turnovers, and overall possession control. Minnesota collected 33 rebounds and committed only six turnovers, compared with 23 rebounds and 12 turnovers for Indiana.

The individual numbers were also impressive. Kelsey Mitchell led all scorers with 37 points for Indiana, while Caitlin Clark produced 19 points and 10 assists. Aliyah Boston added 15 points, eight rebounds, and seven assists. For Minnesota, Olivia Miles scored 28 points, Courtney Williams added 27, and Napheesa Collier contributed 18 points, eight rebounds, and seven assists.

This article breaks down those performances in detail and explains what the box score reveals about how Minnesota secured the 108-100 victory.

Table of Contents

Minnesota Lynx vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The matchup took place on August 2, 2026, at Target Center in Minneapolis, with an announced attendance of 16,505. Minnesota entered the contest with a strong home record shown in the supplied box-score information, while Indiana was also having a successful season.

The game remained competitive because Indiana’s offense was highly efficient. The Fever shot 57 percent from the field and 46 percent from three-point range. Those are excellent shooting numbers for a professional basketball team.

Minnesota matched Indiana’s 57 percent field-goal percentage while making more total shots. The Lynx attempted 76 field goals compared with Indiana’s 68, giving Minnesota eight additional field-goal attempts.

That difference matters.

When two teams shoot the same percentage, the team that creates more attempts has an opportunity to generate more points. Minnesota also created additional possessions through offensive rebounding and benefited from Indiana’s turnovers.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring illustrates how the game developed:

Quarter	Indiana Fever	Minnesota Lynx
1st	33	36
2nd	20	28
3rd	23	23
4th	24	21
Final	100	108

Minnesota built its eight-point winning margin primarily during the first half. The Lynx led 64-53 at halftime based on the supplied quarter totals, creating an 11-point advantage before the game entered the second half.

Indiana did not collapse after halftime. The Fever matched Minnesota 23-23 in the third quarter and actually outscored the Lynx 24-21 in the fourth. However, the first-half deficit proved too large to erase.

Final Score and Team Statistical Comparison

The team statistics provide a useful foundation for understanding the result.

Category	Indiana Fever	Minnesota Lynx
Points	100	108
Field Goals	39-68	43-76
Field-Goal Percentage	57%	57%
3-Point Field Goals	11-24	11-25
3-Point Percentage	46%	44%
Free Throws	11-15	11-15
Free-Throw Percentage	73%	73%
Rebounds	23	33
Assists	27	28
Turnovers	12	6
Steals	4	6
Blocks	2	3
Offensive Rebounds	5	11
Defensive Rebounds	18	22
Fouls	15	16

At first glance, Indiana’s shooting numbers look strong enough to win. The Fever made the same number of three-pointers as Minnesota and actually had a slightly better three-point percentage.

The difference was volume and possession management.

Minnesota had 10 more rebounds overall and six more offensive rebounds. The Lynx also committed half as many turnovers as Indiana.

Those two statistics are especially important because they can create extra possessions without requiring better shooting.

Minnesota’s 11 offensive rebounds allowed the Lynx to recover missed shots and create additional opportunities. Indiana collected only five offensive rebounds.

The six-turnover difference is equally significant. Six fewer turnovers can mean several additional possessions for the offense while simultaneously preventing the opponent from receiving transition opportunities.

Kelsey Mitchell Leads Indiana With 37 Points

Kelsey Mitchell was the standout scorer for Indiana.

She finished with:

37 points
35 minutes
14-of-21 field goals
6-of-8 three-pointers
3-of-4 free throws
1 rebound
3 assists
1 turnover
1 steal
Plus/minus of -6

Mitchell’s shooting efficiency was one of the most impressive elements of the entire game.

She converted 14 of 21 attempts from the field, which is approximately 66.7 percent. She was also extremely efficient from long range, making six of eight three-point attempts for 75 percent.

That means Mitchell was not simply accumulating points through high shot volume. She was converting her opportunities at an exceptional rate.

Her 37 points represented more than one-third of Indiana’s total scoring.

Yet the Fever still lost by eight points.

That illustrates an important lesson when analyzing player statistics: an outstanding individual scoring performance does not automatically translate into a team victory.

Mitchell’s plus/minus of -6 also provides some context, although plus/minus should never be treated as a complete measure of individual performance. Her offensive production was excellent, but Minnesota ultimately won the overall possession and team efficiency battle.

Caitlin Clark Records 19 Points and 10 Assists

Caitlin Clark finished with 19 points and led Indiana with 10 assists.

Her complete listed line was:

34 minutes
19 points
8-of-18 field goals
2-of-9 three-pointers
1-of-1 free throws
1 rebound
10 assists
4 turnovers
1 steal
Plus/minus of -7

Clark’s 10 assists were particularly important because they show how much of Indiana’s offense flowed through her playmaking.

She was not at her best from three-point range, converting two of nine attempts. Her overall field-goal shooting was considerably better, with eight makes on 18 attempts.

The four turnovers are worth noting because they were part of Indiana’s 12 total turnovers. Minnesota had only six.

This does not mean the loss can be attributed to Clark’s turnovers alone. Turnovers are team events as much as individual events, and Indiana still generated 27 assists while shooting 57 percent from the field.

The more useful conclusion is that Minnesota’s defensive pressure and possession management helped limit the number of opportunities Indiana could turn into points.

Aliyah Boston Provides All-Around Production

Aliyah Boston produced one of Indiana’s most balanced statistical performances.

Her line included:

15 points
7-of-14 field goals
1-of-4 three-pointers
8 rebounds
7 assists
3 turnovers
33 minutes
Plus/minus of -8

Boston’s eight rebounds made her Indiana’s leading rebounder in the supplied statistics.

Her seven assists were also notable for a frontcourt player. Combined with Clark’s 10 assists, Boston’s seven helped Indiana reach 27 team assists.

The bigger issue was that Indiana could not match Minnesota’s work on the glass.

Boston personally grabbed eight rebounds, but the Fever finished with only 23 total rebounds. Minnesota had 33.

That 10-rebound difference indicates that Boston’s individual rebounding effort was not enough to solve the team’s broader rebounding disadvantage.

Olivia Miles Leads Minnesota With 28 Points

Olivia Miles was Minnesota’s leading scorer with 28 points.

Her statistical line:

32 minutes
28 points
11-of-14 field goals
3-of-6 three-pointers
3-of-3 free throws
4 rebounds
6 assists
3 turnovers
1 block
Plus/minus of -1

Miles was highly efficient from the field, making 11 of 14 attempts.

That works out to approximately 78.6 percent shooting from the field, an outstanding number.

She also made half of her three-point attempts and converted all three free throws.

Her six assists added another dimension to the performance. Minnesota did not rely exclusively on one player to create offense. The Lynx received major contributions from Miles, Courtney Williams, and Napheesa Collier.

One unusual detail is Miles’ minus-1 plus/minus despite Minnesota winning by eight. This is a good example of why a single advanced or tracking statistic should not be used in isolation.

Her scoring efficiency and playmaking were clearly valuable, but plus/minus measures the team’s scoring margin while a player is on the court. It does not independently measure every aspect of an individual’s performance.

Courtney Williams Adds 27 Points

Courtney Williams was another major reason Minnesota’s offense remained productive.

She finished with:

27 points
34 minutes
12-of-20 field goals
2-of-4 three-pointers
1-of-2 free throws
4 rebounds
5 assists
Plus/minus of +18

Williams made 60 percent of her field-goal attempts and contributed five assists.

Her plus/minus of +18 was the strongest listed figure among the major Minnesota contributors in the supplied player statistics.

The combination of scoring and playmaking made Williams difficult to neutralize. If Indiana focused too heavily on one scoring option, Minnesota had other players capable of taking advantage of defensive attention.

This is one of the clearest themes in the game.

Indiana had Mitchell’s 37-point explosion, but Minnesota had multiple high-level offensive contributors.

Napheesa Collier’s Complete Performance

Napheesa Collier added 18 points, eight rebounds, and seven assists.

Her listed statistics were:

31 minutes
18 points
6-of-13 field goals
3-of-5 three-pointers
3-of-4 free throws
8 rebounds
7 assists
1 steal
1 block
Plus/minus of +16

Collier’s contribution was particularly valuable because she influenced several areas of the game.

She tied for Minnesota’s lead in rebounds, produced seven assists, scored efficiently from three-point range, and added defensive statistics.

Her eight rebounds helped Minnesota maintain its advantage on the boards, while her seven assists helped the Lynx reach 28 team assists.

The plus/minus of +16 further reflects how effective Minnesota was during her minutes, although, as with every plus/minus figure, it should be interpreted alongside the rest of the box score.

Why Minnesota Won Despite Similar Shooting Percentages

The most important analytical point in the game is that both teams shot 57 percent from the field.

So why did Minnesota win?

The answer begins with possession creation.

Minnesota had:

10 more total rebounds
6 more offensive rebounds
6 fewer turnovers
2 more steals
1 more block
8 more field-goal attempts

The Lynx also had 11 offensive rebounds compared with five for Indiana.

This combination helped Minnesota generate more opportunities.

A team can shoot extremely well and still lose if the opponent creates more possessions and takes better advantage of missed shots.

Indiana’s 57 percent field-goal shooting and 46 percent three-point shooting were both excellent. But Minnesota took 76 field-goal attempts compared with 68 for Indiana.

The Lynx therefore had eight more field-goal attempts while maintaining the same overall field-goal percentage.

That is a powerful statistical advantage.

Rebounding Was a Major Difference

Rebounding deserves special attention because the gap was substantial.

Minnesota collected 33 total rebounds, while Indiana recorded 23.

The offensive-rebounding difference was even more important:

Minnesota: 11 offensive rebounds

Indiana: 5 offensive rebounds

The Lynx therefore grabbed six more offensive rebounds.

Offensive rebounds are valuable because they extend possessions. A missed shot does not necessarily end an offensive possession if a teammate recovers the ball.

Minnesota repeatedly created second chances.

Indiana’s 23 total rebounds also meant fewer opportunities to end Minnesota possessions cleanly.

This is one of the clearest statistical reasons that the final score was different from what the shooting percentages might initially suggest.

Turnovers Helped Minnesota Control the Game

Minnesota committed only six turnovers.

Indiana committed 12.

That is a 2-to-1 difference.

For a game decided by eight points, this is especially meaningful.

Every turnover can represent a lost offensive opportunity. Depending on the situation, it can also give the opponent a chance to score in transition.

Minnesota’s six-turnover performance indicates excellent ball security.

The Lynx did not need to shoot dramatically better than Indiana. They simply protected the ball while generating more opportunities through rebounding.

This is an important distinction for anyone studying basketball statistics. Efficiency is not only about shooting percentage. Possession efficiency matters too.

Three-Point Shooting Was Close

Indiana made 11 of 24 three-point attempts.

Minnesota made 11 of 25.

The Fever therefore shot 46 percent from three, compared with 44 percent for the Lynx.

Indiana had a slight edge in long-range efficiency, but Minnesota matched the Fever in made three-pointers.

Kelsey Mitchell was the biggest reason for Indiana’s success from outside. Her six three-pointers on eight attempts were outstanding.

Minnesota received three made threes from Olivia Miles and three from Napheesa Collier according to their listed individual statistics.

The result was a relatively balanced three-point battle.

That makes the rebounding and turnover differences even more important.

Free-Throw Shooting Was Identical

Both teams finished 11-of-15 at the free-throw line.

That means neither side gained an advantage from free throws.

Both teams shot 73 percent.

Because the free-throw totals and percentages were identical, free throws were not a major explanation for the final eight-point difference.

This is another reason to look beyond the headline scoring numbers.

The First Half Changed the Game

Minnesota scored 36 points in the first quarter and 28 in the second.

Indiana scored 33 and 20.

That gave Minnesota a major first-half advantage.

The third quarter was even at 23-23.

Indiana then won the fourth quarter 24-21.

In other words, the Fever did not lose the second half. They lost the game largely because Minnesota built a substantial lead before halftime.

This is an important game-flow observation that can be missed when looking only at the final score.

Indiana’s offense remained dangerous throughout the game. The Fever scored 100 points and finished with strong shooting numbers.

Minnesota simply built enough separation early and then managed the advantage.

Comparing the Major Players

The individual statistical comparison shows how differently the two teams reached 100-plus points.

Player	Team	Points	Rebounds	Assists	FG
Kelsey Mitchell	Indiana	37	1	3	14-21
Caitlin Clark	Indiana	19	1	10	8-18
Aliyah Boston	Indiana	15	8	7	7-14
Olivia Miles	Minnesota	28	4	6	11-14
Courtney Williams	Minnesota	27	4	5	12-20
Napheesa Collier	Minnesota	18	8	7	6-13

Mitchell was the game’s highest scorer, but Minnesota had two players with at least 27 points.

That distribution matters.

The Lynx received 28 points from Miles and 27 from Williams, giving them 55 points from those two players alone.

Collier then added 18.

This created a balanced scoring structure.

Indiana, meanwhile, depended heavily on Mitchell’s 37 points, with Clark and Boston providing the next major scoring contributions.

What the Plus/Minus Numbers Tell Us

The supplied player statistics include plus/minus figures that offer another way to view the contest.

Williams posted +18.

Collier posted +16.

Mitchell finished at -6.

Clark finished at -7.

Boston finished at -8.

Miles finished at -1.

These numbers generally align with the overall team result, but they should be interpreted carefully.

Plus/minus does not say that one player was individually responsible for every point scored or allowed while they were on the court. Lineups, opponent combinations, substitutions, and team-level events all affect the number.

The most useful interpretation is contextual.

Williams and Collier were on the floor for strong Minnesota stretches, while Indiana’s primary players had negative plus/minus figures despite strong individual offensive production.

That reinforces the difference between individual statistics and team outcomes.

Minnesota’s Offensive Balance Stood Out

Minnesota scored 108 points with three major contributors reaching 18 or more.

Miles scored 28.

Williams scored 27.

Collier scored 18.

That is 73 combined points from three players.

The scoring was supported by 28 team assists.

Minnesota’s offense therefore combined individual shot-making with ball movement.

The Lynx did not simply rely on one player taking a large number of attempts.

Miles was particularly efficient at 11-of-14 from the field, while Williams was 12-of-20.

That efficiency allowed Minnesota to score heavily without needing excessive free throws.

Indiana’s Offense Was Still Highly Effective

It would be inaccurate to describe Indiana’s offensive performance as poor.

The Fever scored 100 points.

They shot 57 percent from the field.

They made 46 percent of their three-point attempts.

They recorded 27 assists.

Mitchell scored 37 points on 21 field-goal attempts.

Clark produced 10 assists.

Boston recorded 15 points, eight rebounds, and seven assists.

Those are strong offensive numbers.

The loss was more about the overall possession battle than an inability to score.

This distinction is important for evaluating future games. A team that scores 100 points and shoots 57 percent is clearly capable of producing efficient offense. The areas requiring closer examination are the 12 turnovers and 23 rebounds.

What the Stats Suggest About Each Team

For Minnesota, the game suggests several strengths.

Efficient Shot Creation

The Lynx shot 57 percent while attempting 76 field goals.

That combination is difficult for an opponent to overcome.

Strong Offensive Rebounding

Eleven offensive rebounds created additional opportunities.

Ball Security

Six turnovers were an excellent number considering the pace and scoring level of the contest.

Balanced Playmaking

Minnesota recorded 28 assists, with Collier producing seven and Miles six.

For Indiana, the game highlighted different strengths.

Elite Individual Scoring

Mitchell’s 37 points were the highest scoring total in the game.

Efficient Perimeter Shooting

The Fever made 11 three-pointers at a 46 percent rate.

Playmaking

Clark’s 10 assists and Boston’s seven assists gave Indiana strong distribution.

Interior Contribution

Boston’s eight rebounds led the Fever.

The main weaknesses suggested by the box score were rebounding and turnovers rather than shooting.

A Note About the Records in the Supplied Data

The supplied information contains two different sets of team records.

The game information lists Indiana at 19-11 overall and 8-6 away, with Minnesota at 25-6 overall and 12-4 at home.

Separately, the standings context is shown as Indiana 23-12 and Minnesota 29-7.

Because those figures do not match, they should not be treated as interchangeable.

For an accurate published article, the safest approach is to use the game-specific box-score figures when describing the contest itself and avoid presenting the separate standings figures as though they were the same records.

This is an important fact-checking principle for sports content. When multiple records appear in a source, the date and context attached to each number matter.

Season Series Context

The supplied data states that Minnesota leads the season series 1-0 following this game.

The next Fever-Lynx matchup is listed for September 23, 2026, in Indiana, with a third meeting scheduled for September 25 in Minnesota.

Those future games provide additional context for evaluating whether the statistical patterns from this contest were isolated or part of a larger matchup trend.

The August 2 game demonstrated that Indiana can score efficiently against Minnesota, but it also showed that the Lynx can create extra possessions through rebounding and ball security.

Future meetings would provide a useful test of whether either team adjusts its approach.

How to Read Player Stats More Effectively

A common mistake in sports analysis is to identify the leading scorer and stop there.

A stronger method is to examine five layers.

1. Scoring

Start with points, but also check field-goal attempts and shooting percentage.

Mitchell’s 37 points become more impressive when paired with 14-of-21 shooting.

2. Creation

Look at assists and turnovers together.

Clark had 10 assists but four turnovers.

Collier had seven assists and no listed turnovers in her supplied line.

3. Possessions

Rebounding and turnovers help explain who controlled the number of possessions.

Minnesota clearly won this category.

4. Efficiency

Compare field-goal, three-point, and free-throw percentages.

Here, both teams were remarkably close overall.

5. Team Context

Finally, consider plus/minus and the team’s overall result.

A player can post excellent individual numbers while the team loses.

Mitchell is a clear example from this game.

Why the Box Score Is More Useful Than the Final Score Alone

The final score says Minnesota won 108-100.

The complete statistical picture says much more.

It shows that Minnesota:

Matched Indiana’s 57 percent field-goal percentage
Made the same number of three-pointers
Grabbed 10 more rebounds
Collected six more offensive rebounds
Committed six fewer turnovers
Recorded two more steals
Recorded one more block
Attempted eight more field goals
Received major scoring contributions from multiple players

Meanwhile, Indiana:

Scored 100 points
Shot 57 percent
Made 11 three-pointers
Had 27 assists
Received 37 points from Mitchell
Received 10 assists from Clark
Received eight rebounds and seven assists from Boston

This is exactly why player statistics and team statistics should be analyzed together.

Key Takeaways From the Matchup

The most important lessons from this game can be summarized simply.

First, Minnesota won the possession battle.

Second, the Lynx received balanced scoring from Miles, Williams, and Collier.

Third, Indiana’s Mitchell delivered the best individual scoring performance of the night with 37 points.

Fourth, Clark’s 10 assists showed that Indiana’s offense still generated significant playmaking.

Fifth, Boston’s eight rebounds led the Fever, but Indiana still lost the overall rebounding battle by 10.

Sixth, both teams shot 57 percent from the field, meaning shooting efficiency alone does not explain the result.

Seventh, Minnesota’s six turnovers compared with Indiana’s 12 were a major difference.

Finally, Minnesota’s 11 offensive rebounds compared with Indiana’s five helped create the additional possessions that ultimately supported the eight-point victory.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Minnesota Lynx and Indiana Fever?

The Minnesota Lynx defeated the Indiana Fever 108-100 on August 2, 2026, at Target Center in Minneapolis.

Who was the leading scorer?

Kelsey Mitchell led all players with 37 points for Indiana. She shot 14-of-21 from the field and 6-of-8 from three-point range.

Who led Minnesota in scoring?

Olivia Miles led Minnesota with 28 points on 11-of-14 shooting. Courtney Williams added 27 points.

How did Caitlin Clark perform?

Caitlin Clark scored 19 points and recorded 10 assists. She shot 8-of-18 from the field and made two three-pointers.

Which team had more rebounds?

Minnesota had 33 rebounds compared with 23 for Indiana. The Lynx also had 11 offensive rebounds compared with five for the Fever.

What was the biggest statistical difference?

The biggest differences were rebounding and turnovers. Minnesota had 10 more rebounds and committed six fewer turnovers than Indiana.

Conclusion

The minnesota lynx vs indiana fever match player stats show a game that was much more competitive statistically than the eight-point final margin might suggest.

Indiana produced an excellent offensive performance. Kelsey Mitchell scored 37 points with outstanding shooting efficiency, Caitlin Clark recorded 10 assists, and Aliyah Boston contributed 15 points, eight rebounds, and seven assists. The Fever shot 57 percent from the field and 46 percent from three-point range.

Minnesota answered with a balanced attack. Olivia Miles scored 28 points, Courtney Williams scored 27, and Napheesa Collier delivered an all-around performance with 18 points, eight rebounds, and seven assists.

The deciding factors were largely possession-based. Minnesota grabbed 33 rebounds to Indiana’s 23, collected 11 offensive rebounds to five, and committed only six turnovers compared with Indiana’s 12. Those advantages helped the Lynx create more opportunities even though both teams shot 57 percent from the field.

The first half was also decisive. Minnesota established a lead through a 36-33 opening quarter and a 28-20 second quarter. Indiana competed strongly after halftime, but the Fever could not completely recover from the early deficit.

The result provides a useful example of why basketball analysis should go beyond the leading scorer. Mitchell had the game’s biggest individual scoring total, but Minnesota’s combination of balanced scoring, rebounding, ball security, and efficient offense produced the team victory.