Minnesota Vikings vs Detroit Lions Match Player Stats
The minnesota vikings vs detroit lions match player stats tell the story of one of the most competitive NFL regular season games of the 2025 season. Played on November 2, 2025, the matchup featured momentum swings, explosive defensive plays, efficient quarterback performances, and a dramatic finish that saw the Minnesota Vikings secure a 27 to 24 victory over the Detroit Lions. Although the final score was separated by only three points, the statistical breakdown reveals why Minnesota managed to leave Detroit with an important road win.
Both teams entered the contest with winning ambitions. Detroit came into the game with a 5 to 3 record and had been strong at home, while Minnesota looked to improve its standing after an uneven first half of the season. Every possession mattered, and several key players stepped up when their teams needed them most. From J.J. McCarthy’s touchdown passes to Blake Cashman’s outstanding defensive performance, this game provided plenty of memorable moments worth analyzing.
This article takes an in depth look at every important statistic, player performance, offensive trend, defensive highlight, and team comparison from this exciting contest.
Match Overview
| Category | Details |
| Event | NFL Regular Season |
| Date | November 2, 2025 |
| Match | Minnesota Vikings vs Detroit Lions |
| Final Score | Minnesota Vikings 27, Detroit Lions 24 |
| Winner | Minnesota Vikings |
| Minnesota Record | 4 to 4 |
| Detroit Record | 5 to 3 |
The Vikings built an early lead and maintained enough composure during the closing stages despite multiple Detroit comeback attempts. While Detroit generated more passing yards, Minnesota proved more efficient in critical situations, particularly in the running game, red zone execution, and defensive pressure.
Minnesota Vikings vs Detroit Lions Match Player Stats Quarter by Quarter
First Quarter
Minnesota started aggressively by scoring 14 points during the opening quarter.
Detroit answered with 7 points, but Minnesota’s early offensive rhythm immediately placed pressure on the Lions’ defense.
Quarter Score
| Team | Points |
| Minnesota | 14 |
| Detroit | 7 |
The Vikings established momentum early through balanced offensive play and efficient execution.
Second Quarter
Minnesota managed only one field goal during the second period.
Detroit responded with another touchdown, trimming the halftime deficit.
Halftime Score
Minnesota 17
Detroit 14
The game had become increasingly balanced, with Detroit’s passing offense beginning to find success.
Third Quarter
Minnesota extended its lead by scoring another touchdown.
Detroit managed only a field goal, allowing the Vikings to regain control.
Third Quarter Score
Minnesota 7
Detroit 3
This period ultimately proved decisive because Minnesota stretched the margin before entering the final quarter.
Fourth Quarter
Both teams continued battling until the final whistle.
Minnesota added another field goal.
Detroit scored one touchdown but fell just short of completing the comeback.
Final Score
Minnesota Vikings 27
Detroit Lions 24
Offensive Performance Analysis
Minnesota’s offense looked different from Detroit’s in terms of philosophy.
Detroit relied heavily on Jared Goff’s arm, while Minnesota balanced rushing and passing much more effectively.
Although Detroit finished with considerably more passing yards, Minnesota consistently converted important opportunities into points.
Passing Performance Breakdown
J.J. McCarthy
Minnesota’s young quarterback did not produce huge passing yardage, but he made several throws that directly impacted the outcome.
| Statistic | Value |
| Completions | 14 |
| Attempts | 25 |
| Passing Yards | 143 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks Taken | 5 |
| Passer Rating | 82.6 |
His overall completion percentage was not spectacular, but both touchdown passes proved extremely valuable.
One interception prevented an even stronger statistical outing, yet his ability to avoid additional mistakes helped Minnesota preserve its lead.
Jared Goff
From a pure passing perspective, Goff delivered one of the better quarterback performances of the week.
| Statistic | Value |
| Completions | 25 |
| Attempts | 37 |
| Passing Yards | 284 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks Taken | 5 |
| Passer Rating | 108.4 |
Nearly every traditional passing category favored Goff.
He completed more passes.
He threw for almost twice as many yards.
He avoided interceptions.
He finished with an outstanding passer rating.
However, football games are not decided by passing numbers alone. Minnesota compensated through rushing efficiency, stronger situational football, and timely defensive plays.
Comparing the Quarterbacks
| Category | J.J. McCarthy | Jared Goff |
| Passing Yards | 143 | 284 |
| Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 82.6 | 108.4 |
| Sacks Taken | 5 | 5 |
While Goff produced superior statistics, McCarthy benefited from excellent support around him, allowing Minnesota to emerge victorious.
Team Passing Comparison
| Team | Passing Yards | Touchdowns |
| Minnesota | 143 | 2 |
| Detroit | 284 | 2 |
Detroit nearly doubled Minnesota’s passing production.
Even so, Minnesota remained more balanced offensively, preventing Detroit’s defense from focusing solely on the passing game.
Early Observations from the Match
Several themes become clear when studying the minnesota vikings vs detroit lions match player stats.
First, passing yards alone did not determine the winner.
Second, Minnesota’s rushing attack created balance that Detroit struggled to match.
Third, defensive pressure played a major role throughout the contest, as both teams recorded five sacks.
Finally, Minnesota capitalized on key scoring opportunities, while Detroit’s missed field goal and lost fumble proved costly in such a closely contested game.
The offensive numbers suggest Detroit generated more yardage, but Minnesota made better use of its possessions and controlled the game’s most important moments.
Rushing Performance Analysis
While Detroit held a clear advantage through the air, Minnesota controlled one of the most important areas of modern football: the ground game. The rushing numbers show that the Vikings consistently gained positive yardage, helping them manage the clock, stay ahead of the chains, and reduce pressure on their quarterback.
A balanced offense often becomes the difference in close games, and this matchup demonstrated exactly why.
Aaron Jones Sr. Led Minnesota’s Ground Attack
Aaron Jones Sr. made the most of his limited opportunities. Although he carried the football only nine times, he averaged an outstanding 8.7 yards per carry, giving Minnesota explosive plays whenever he touched the ball.
| Statistic | Aaron Jones Sr. |
| Carries | 9 |
| Rushing Yards | 78 |
| Average | 8.7 |
| Long Run | 31 |
His longest run of 31 yards helped flip field position and kept Detroit’s defense from focusing entirely on stopping the passing game.
Rather than relying on one workhorse back, Minnesota distributed carries efficiently, resulting in a productive team rushing performance.
David Montgomery Continued Fighting for Detroit
Detroit’s rushing offense never established the same rhythm.
David Montgomery remained effective in short-yardage situations and scored a touchdown, but Minnesota’s defensive front prevented him from generating explosive runs.
| Statistic | David Montgomery |
| Carries | 11 |
| Rushing Yards | 40 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
Montgomery’s touchdown kept Detroit within striking distance, but his average gain per carry reflected how difficult every rushing attempt became against Minnesota’s defense.
Team Rushing Comparison
The overall rushing statistics strongly favored Minnesota.
| Team | Carries | Yards | Average | Touchdowns |
| Minnesota Vikings | 29 | 142 | 4.9 | 1 |
| Detroit Lions | 20 | 65 | 3.3 | 1 |
Minnesota more than doubled Detroit’s rushing production.
That advantage allowed the Vikings to:
- Control possession during key stretches.
- Create manageable third-down situations.
- Keep Detroit’s pass rush from becoming overly aggressive.
- Wear down the defensive front late in the game.
Although both teams scored one rushing touchdown, Minnesota’s efficiency on the ground proved significantly better.
Receiving Performance Analysis
The receiving statistics reveal two very different offensive styles.
Detroit relied on volume passing, spreading the football among multiple receivers throughout the afternoon.
Minnesota generated fewer passing yards but converted important receptions into touchdowns.
Minnesota Vikings Receiving Leaders
Justin Jefferson
Justin Jefferson once again demonstrated why he remains one of the league’s most dependable receivers.
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 6 |
| Receiving Yards | 47 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
His touchdown reception came at an important moment and helped Minnesota maintain offensive momentum.
Although his yardage total was modest by his standards, his ability to produce in scoring situations made a significant impact.
Jordan Addison
Jordan Addison finished as Minnesota’s leading receiver in total yardage.
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 2 |
| Receiving Yards | 48 |
Despite catching only two passes, Addison averaged impressive yardage per reception and stretched Detroit’s secondary.
T.J. Hockenson
The veteran tight end remained a reliable red-zone target.
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 2 |
| Receiving Yards | 11 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
His touchdown highlighted Minnesota’s ability to capitalize inside the red zone despite producing fewer passing yards overall.
Detroit Lions Receiving Leaders
Detroit’s passing attack featured multiple standout performances.
Sam LaPorta
The tight end consistently found openings against Minnesota’s defense.
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 6 |
| Receiving Yards | 97 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
LaPorta repeatedly moved the chains and delivered one of Detroit’s most productive receiving performances.
Amon-Ra St. Brown
St. Brown continued proving why he is among the NFL’s most reliable receivers.
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 9 |
| Receiving Yards | 97 |
Although he did not score, his nine receptions kept Detroit’s offense alive throughout the contest.
Jameson Williams
Jameson Williams contributed another explosive performance.
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 4 |
| Receiving Yards | 66 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
His touchdown reception energized Detroit during its comeback effort.
Team Receiving Comparison
| Team | Receptions | Yards | Touchdowns |
| Minnesota Vikings | 14 | 143 | 2 |
| Detroit Lions | 25 | 284 | 2 |
Detroit nearly doubled Minnesota’s receiving production.
However, Minnesota’s receivers converted their limited opportunities into touchdowns with remarkable efficiency.
Defensive Performance Analysis
Defense ultimately played one of the biggest roles in deciding this game.
Both teams recorded five sacks, but Minnesota’s defense consistently delivered impact plays during critical situations.
Blake Cashman Dominated the Vikings Defense
Blake Cashman delivered arguably the most impressive defensive performance of the game.
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Tackles | 14 |
His ability to diagnose running plays and finish tackles prevented Detroit from establishing a consistent rushing attack.
Throughout the afternoon, Cashman seemed to be around the football on nearly every important defensive snap.
Jack Campbell Led Detroit
Jack Campbell once again showed why he has become one of Detroit’s defensive leaders.
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Tackles | 9 |
His tackling helped limit Minnesota after contact, particularly during rushing attempts.
Team Defensive Comparison
| Category | Minnesota | Detroit |
| Total Tackles | 80 | 61 |
| Sacks | 5 | 5 |
| Tackles for Loss | 10 | 7 |
| Quarterback Hits | 11 | 9 |
Minnesota’s defense generated:
- More total tackles.
- More tackles behind the line of scrimmage.
- More quarterback hits.
Those numbers illustrate why Detroit struggled to establish offensive balance despite an excellent passing day from Jared Goff.
Turnovers
Turnovers often determine close football games.
Here is how both teams performed.
| Category | Minnesota | Detroit |
| Fumbles | 1 | |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | |
| Interceptions Thrown | 1 |
| Category | Detroit | Value |
| Fumbles | 1 | |
| Fumbles Lost | 1 | |
| Interceptions Made | 1 |
Minnesota protected its fumble despite putting the ball on the ground once.
Detroit, however, lost its only fumble, creating one of the game’s biggest momentum swings.
When evaluating the minnesota vikings vs detroit lions match player stats, that turnover stands out as one of the hidden reasons Minnesota secured the victory despite being outgained through the air.
Special Teams Analysis
Special teams rarely receive as much attention as offense or defense, but they often influence field position and momentum in close NFL games. In this matchup, both teams received solid contributions from their return specialists, kickers, and punters. Minnesota held a slight advantage in the kicking game, while Detroit generated strong return yardage.
Kick Return Leaders
Minnesota Vikings
Myles Price gave Minnesota excellent starting field position throughout the game.
| Statistic | Value |
| Returns | 5 |
| Return Yards | 164 |
| Average | 32.8 |
| Long Return | 61 |
A return average of more than 30 yards consistently helped the Vikings begin drives in favorable field position.
Detroit Lions
Jacob Saylors also delivered an impressive performance on kick returns.
| Statistic | Value |
| Returns | 6 |
| Return Yards | 170 |
| Average | 28.3 |
| Long Return | 39 |
Although Saylors recorded more total return yards, Minnesota’s average return was higher and included the game’s longest kick return.
Punt Return Leaders
| Team | Player | Returns | Yards |
| Minnesota | Myles Price | 1 | 7 |
| Detroit | Kalif Raymond | 2 | 15 |
Neither team produced a game changing punt return, but both return units secured possession without costly mistakes.
Kicking Performance
Will Reichard
Minnesota’s kicker delivered a flawless outing.
| Statistic | Value |
| Field Goals | 2 of 2 |
| Long Field Goal | 50 |
| Extra Points | 3 of 3 |
| Total Points | 9 |
Converting every scoring opportunity proved valuable in a game decided by only three points.
Jake Bates
Detroit’s kicker had a respectable game but missed one field goal attempt.
| Statistic | Value |
| Field Goals | 1 of 2 |
| Long Field Goal | 41 |
| Extra Points | 3 of 3 |
| Total Points | 6 |
That missed field goal became one of the defining moments of the contest.
Punting Comparison
| Team | Punts | Total Yards | Average | Long |
| Minnesota | 4 | 176 | 44.0 | 51 |
| Detroit | 5 | 238 | 47.6 | 58 |
Detroit’s Jack Fox averaged more yards per punt, while Ryan Wright consistently gave Minnesota manageable field position.
Complete Team Statistics
| Category | Minnesota Vikings | Detroit Lions |
| Final Score | 27 | 24 |
| Passing Yards | 143 | 284 |
| Passing TD | 2 | 2 |
| Rushing Yards | 142 | 65 |
| Rushing TD | 1 | 1 |
| Receiving Yards | 143 | 284 |
| Total Sacks | 5 | 5 |
| Total Tackles | 80 | 61 |
| Tackles For Loss | 10 | 7 |
| Quarterback Hits | 11 | 9 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 1 |
Key Player Statistics
Minnesota Vikings
| Player | Performance |
| J.J. McCarthy | 14 of 25, 143 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT |
| Aaron Jones Sr. | 9 carries, 78 yards |
| Justin Jefferson | 6 receptions, 47 yards, 1 TD |
| Jordan Addison | 2 receptions, 48 yards |
| T.J. Hockenson | 2 receptions, 11 yards, 1 TD |
| Blake Cashman | 14 tackles |
| Will Reichard | Perfect on field goals and extra points |
Detroit Lions
| Player | Performance |
| Jared Goff | 25 of 37, 284 yards, 2 TD |
| David Montgomery | 11 carries, 40 yards, 1 TD |
| Amon Ra St. Brown | 9 receptions, 97 yards |
| Sam LaPorta | 6 receptions, 97 yards, 1 TD |
| Jameson Williams | 4 receptions, 66 yards, 1 TD |
| Jack Campbell | 9 tackles |
| Jake Bates | 1 of 2 field goals |
Why Minnesota Won the Game
Looking beyond the scoreboard, several factors explain why Minnesota earned the victory.
Superior Rushing Attack
Minnesota rushed for 142 yards, more than double Detroit’s 65 rushing yards. That balance prevented the offense from becoming one dimensional.
Better Red Zone Efficiency
The Vikings scored touchdowns on key possessions despite generating fewer passing yards.
Strong Defensive Pressure
Minnesota finished with:
- 80 total tackles.
- 10 tackles for loss.
- 11 quarterback hits.
- 5 sacks.
The defense consistently disrupted Detroit’s offensive rhythm.
Winning the Turnover Battle
Detroit lost its only fumble, while Minnesota recovered its own. In a three point game, that difference carried significant weight.
Reliable Kicking
Will Reichard converted every kick, including a 50 yard field goal. Every point mattered in such a closely contested matchup.
Biggest Performers of the Game
Offensive MVP
Aaron Jones Sr.
His explosive rushing average gave Minnesota the offensive balance needed to control key moments.
Passing MVP
Jared Goff
Although Detroit fell short, Goff threw for 284 yards, two touchdowns, and avoided interceptions.
Defensive MVP
Blake Cashman
Fourteen total tackles and leadership throughout the game made him Minnesota’s most impactful defender.
Special Teams MVP
Will Reichard
A perfect kicking performance proved critical in securing the Vikings’ 27 to 24 victory.
Key Takeaways
The minnesota vikings vs detroit lions match player stats illustrate that football is about efficiency rather than simply accumulating yards. Detroit generated significantly more passing offense, yet Minnesota executed better in the situations that mattered most.
Balanced rushing, timely touchdown drives, disciplined defense, dependable special teams, and winning the turnover battle allowed the Vikings to overcome the statistical advantage Detroit enjoyed through the air.
This game also highlighted the importance of complementary football. Minnesota’s offense, defense, and special teams each contributed winning moments instead of relying on one dominant unit.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Minnesota Vikings vs Detroit Lions game on November 2, 2025?
The Minnesota Vikings defeated the Detroit Lions by a final score of 27 to 24 during the NFL regular season.
Who led Minnesota in passing?
J.J. McCarthy completed 14 of 25 passes for 143 yards with two touchdowns and one interception.
Who threw for the most passing yards in the game?
Jared Goff led all quarterbacks with 284 passing yards, completing 25 of his 37 pass attempts while throwing two touchdowns and no interceptions.
Who was the leading rusher?
Aaron Jones Sr. led all rushers with 78 yards on nine carries, averaging an impressive 8.7 yards per attempt.
Which receiver had the most receiving yards?
Sam LaPorta and Amon Ra St. Brown each finished with 97 receiving yards for Detroit, tying for the game lead.
Which defender recorded the most tackles?
Blake Cashman led all defenders with 14 total tackles, making him one of the most influential players in the game.
Conclusion
The minnesota vikings vs detroit lions match player stats provide a clear picture of how Minnesota earned a hard fought 27 to 24 victory despite being outperformed in several traditional passing categories. Detroit showcased an efficient aerial attack behind Jared Goff and a productive group of receivers, but Minnesota’s balanced offensive approach, dominant rushing performance, disciplined defense, and flawless kicking ultimately proved to be the deciding factors.
Every phase of the game contributed to the final result. Aaron Jones Sr. supplied explosive runs, J.J. McCarthy delivered timely touchdown passes, Blake Cashman anchored a relentless defensive effort, and Will Reichard converted every scoring opportunity. When combined with winning the turnover battle, those performances helped Minnesota secure an important road victory against a strong divisional opponent.