Oklahoma City Thunder vs LA Clippers Match Player Stats
The oklahoma city thunder vs la clippers match player stats from April 9, 2026, tell a clear story of Oklahoma City controlling the game early, building a large advantage, and then managing the second half despite a Clippers response. The Thunder defeated the LA Clippers 128-110 at Intuit Dome in Inglewood, California, behind a dominant performance from Chet Holmgren and another highly efficient all-around effort from Shai Gilgeous-Alexander.
Holmgren finished with 30 points and 14 rebounds, while Gilgeous-Alexander recorded 20 points and 11 assists. Jalen Williams added 18 points, and Isaiah Joe provided 21 points from the bench. For the Clippers, Kawhi Leonard led the team with 20 points, while Bennedict Mathurin scored 17 and Brook Lopez added 16.
The result was more important than a normal late-season win. Oklahoma City improved to 64-16 and secured the NBA’s best regular-season record and the Western Conference’s No. 1 seed. The Thunder also completed a 3-0 season sweep of the Clippers.
Oklahoma City Thunder vs LA Clippers Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The game took place at Intuit Dome on April 9, 2026, with an announced attendance of 17,927.
Oklahoma City entered the matchup with a 63-16 record according to the game context, while the Clippers were 41-39. The Thunder had already established themselves as the leading team in the Western Conference, but this game gave them the opportunity to clinch the league’s best regular-season record.
They took advantage of it.
The final score was:
- Oklahoma City Thunder: 128
- LA Clippers: 110
The Thunder’s advantage came from a combination of efficient shooting, strong rebounding, ball movement, interior production, and defensive pressure.
The official NBA game record confirms the 128-110 final score, the 34-23 first quarter, 35-26 second quarter, 25-31 third quarter, and 34-30 fourth quarter. It also confirms Holmgren’s 30-point, 14-rebound performance and Gilgeous-Alexander’s 20-point, 11-assist line. (NBA)
Final Score by Quarter
| Quarter | Thunder | Clippers |
| 1st | 34 | 23 |
| 2nd | 35 | 26 |
| 3rd | 25 | 31 |
| 4th | 34 | 30 |
| Final | 128 | 110 |
The first half was the decisive portion of the contest.
Oklahoma City scored 69 points across the opening two quarters while allowing only 49. That created a 20-point halftime advantage. Los Angeles improved after halftime, but the deficit was already too large to overcome.
The Clippers won the third quarter 31-25, but Oklahoma City answered with a 34-point fourth quarter.
That response was important because it prevented Los Angeles from turning its third-quarter momentum into a genuine comeback.
Chet Holmgren Dominates the Interior
Chet Holmgren was the biggest individual difference-maker.
He finished with:
- 30 points
- 14 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 10-of-13 shooting from the field
- 3-of-4 shooting from three-point range
- 7-of-10 shooting from the free-throw line
His shooting efficiency was especially impressive.
Holmgren made 10 of his 13 field-goal attempts, which translates to roughly 76.9% shooting from the field. He also made three of his four three-point attempts.
That combination created a difficult defensive problem for Los Angeles.
A traditional big defender had to respect Holmgren’s ability to score inside. At the same time, leaving him open on the perimeter created opportunities for an efficient three-point shot.
His 14 rebounds were equally important.
Oklahoma City finished with 44 total rebounds compared with 36 for Los Angeles. Holmgren’s individual rebounding helped the Thunder control additional possessions and limit the Clippers’ ability to create second-chance opportunities.
The official NBA recap identified Holmgren’s 30 points and 14 rebounds as the headline performance of the game. (NBA)
Why Holmgren’s Efficiency Mattered
Thirty points alone do not explain Holmgren’s impact.
He reached that total on only 13 field-goal attempts.
That matters because an efficient 30-point performance places less pressure on the rest of the offense. Oklahoma City did not need Holmgren to take 20 or 25 shots to reach a high scoring total.
Instead, he converted a large percentage of his opportunities while also contributing as a rebounder and passer.
His performance is a useful example of why player evaluation should look beyond points.
A player who scores 30 points on 13 shots has a very different offensive impact from a player who needs 25 shots to reach the same total.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Controls the Offense
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander did not lead the Thunder in scoring, but his overall influence remained significant.
He finished with:
- 20 points
- 11 assists
- 9-of-17 field-goal shooting
The 11 assists are particularly important.
Oklahoma City finished with 30 team assists, meaning Gilgeous-Alexander was directly responsible for a substantial portion of the Thunder’s offensive creation.
His scoring also remained efficient. He made 9 of 17 field-goal attempts, or approximately 52.9%.
This created a balanced offensive structure.
Los Angeles could not focus exclusively on Holmgren because Gilgeous-Alexander could create his own shot. At the same time, aggressive defensive attention toward Gilgeous-Alexander could lead to passing opportunities for Holmgren, Williams, Joe, and other Thunder players.
That balance was one of the central reasons Oklahoma City produced 128 points.
Jalen Williams Provides Reliable Secondary Scoring
Jalen Williams scored 18 points for Oklahoma City.
His scoring total placed him behind Holmgren and Gilgeous-Alexander among the Thunder’s leading scorers, but his role was important because Oklahoma City did not rely on one player to carry the offense.
The Thunder’s scoring structure showed three major offensive layers:
- Holmgren provided efficient interior and perimeter scoring.
- Gilgeous-Alexander created shots for himself and teammates.
- Williams supplied additional scoring pressure.
That structure makes an offense harder to defend.
If a defense concentrates on one player, another scorer can exploit the additional space.
Isaiah Joe Gives Oklahoma City a Major Bench Boost
One of the most important details in the game was the production from Isaiah Joe.
Joe scored 21 points off the bench, giving Oklahoma City another high-level scoring option.
That performance is easy to overlook when the headline numbers belong to Holmgren and Gilgeous-Alexander.
However, bench scoring often becomes critical in games where the starting lineup creates an early lead.
A strong reserve performance allows the coaching staff to maintain offensive pressure while resting key starters.
Joe’s 21 points therefore added another layer to the Thunder’s advantage.
The result was an Oklahoma City attack that could score through multiple players rather than relying entirely on its stars.
Kawhi Leonard Leads the Clippers
Kawhi Leonard was the Clippers’ leading scorer with 20 points.
He shot 8-of-18 from the field and also collected 8 rebounds.
Leonard’s scoring was not enough to match Oklahoma City’s overall offensive efficiency, but his production showed that the Clippers still had a reliable primary scoring option.
The problem for Los Angeles was not simply Leonard’s individual output.
The larger issue was the difference between his production and the Thunder’s overall offensive balance.
Oklahoma City had Holmgren at 30, Gilgeous-Alexander at 20, Williams at 18, and Joe at 21.
Los Angeles needed more consistent production across its rotation to stay within striking distance.
Bennedict Mathurin Adds 17 Points
Bennedict Mathurin finished with 17 points for Los Angeles.
His scoring gave the Clippers another important offensive contributor behind Leonard.
However, the Clippers still struggled to match Oklahoma City’s efficiency from the field.
Los Angeles made 40 of 86 field-goal attempts, which was about 46.5%.
Oklahoma City, by comparison, made 48 of 83 attempts.
That difference is significant.
The Thunder made eight more field goals despite attempting three fewer shots.
That is a strong indicator of why the game moved in Oklahoma City’s direction.
Brook Lopez Scores 16
Brook Lopez added 16 points for the Clippers.
His scoring gave Los Angeles a third meaningful offensive contributor, but the Clippers still entered halftime down by 20.
Lopez’s production became more useful after the break as Los Angeles improved offensively, but the early deficit remained the biggest obstacle.
The Clippers eventually scored 61 points in the second half.
That was a much better offensive showing than their 49-point first half.
Still, Oklahoma City scored 59 points after halftime and maintained control of the game.
John Collins Controls the Clippers’ Rebounding
John Collins led Los Angeles with 9 rebounds.
His work on the glass helped the Clippers stay competitive in the possession battle, but Oklahoma City still finished with an eight-rebound advantage.
The final rebounding numbers were:
- Thunder: 44
- Clippers: 36
That 8-rebound difference matters because extra possessions can create additional scoring opportunities.
The Thunder also produced 19 fast-break points compared with 9 for the Clippers, according to the official game record. (NBA)
Jordan Miller Leads the Clippers in Assists
Jordan Miller recorded a team-high 6 assists for Los Angeles.
That number illustrates one of the differences between the two offenses.
The Clippers finished with 27 assists, while Oklahoma City recorded 30.
The difference was not enormous, but it reflected the Thunder’s slightly stronger overall ball movement.
Gilgeous-Alexander’s 11 assists were particularly influential because he created opportunities while also remaining a scoring threat.
Team Shooting Comparison
The shooting numbers provide one of the clearest explanations for the final result.
| Statistic | Thunder | Clippers |
| Field Goals | 48-83 | 40-86 |
| Field-Goal % | 58% | 47% |
| Three-Pointers | 13-34 | 14-32 |
| Three-Point % | 38% | 44% |
| Free Throws | 19-24 | 16-24 |
| Free-Throw % | 79% | 67% |
Los Angeles actually had the better three-point percentage.
The Clippers shot approximately 44% from three, compared with approximately 38% for Oklahoma City.
That advantage, however, was not enough to compensate for the Thunder’s superior overall field-goal efficiency.
Oklahoma City shot about 58% from the field.
That was the biggest shooting difference in the game.
The Thunder also attempted three fewer total field goals but made eight more.
That means the difference was primarily about conversion rather than volume.
Rebounding and Possession Battle
The Thunder finished with 44 rebounds compared with 36 for Los Angeles.
That gave Oklahoma City an eight-rebound advantage.
Both teams committed 13 turnovers, so neither side gained a clear advantage from turnover avoidance.
Both teams also recorded nine steals.
The bigger difference came from how effectively Oklahoma City converted its offensive opportunities.
The Thunder’s 30 assists also helped turn efficient shooting into a high-scoring team performance.
Team Statistical Snapshot
| Category | Oklahoma City | LA Clippers |
| Points | 128 | 110 |
| Field Goals | 48-83 | 40-86 |
| Three-Pointers | 13-34 | 14-32 |
| Free Throws | 19-24 | 16-24 |
| Rebounds | 44 | 36 |
| Assists | 30 | 27 |
| Turnovers | 13 | 13 |
| Steals | 9 | 9 |
| Blocks | 7 | 3 |
The seven blocks from Oklahoma City compared with three from Los Angeles also show another defensive difference.
The Thunder were able to contest shots without creating a major turnover gap.
That combination helped them control the game without needing an unusually high number of steals.
How the Game Changed After Halftime
The game had two very different phases.
Oklahoma City dominated the first half.
The Thunder scored 34 points in the first quarter and 35 in the second. Los Angeles managed only 23 and 26.
At halftime, Oklahoma City held a 69-49 lead.
The Clippers responded in the third quarter.
Los Angeles scored 31 points while holding the Thunder to 25. That reduced the deficit by six points.
But the comeback stalled in the fourth.
Oklahoma City scored 34 points and Los Angeles scored 30.
Instead of allowing the Clippers to continue building momentum, the Thunder restored their offensive pressure.
This is an important part of understanding the oklahoma city thunder vs la clippers match player stats.
The final 18-point margin makes the game look consistently one-sided, but the third quarter tells a more complicated story.
Los Angeles did make adjustments.
The issue was that those adjustments came after Oklahoma City had already created too much separation.
Why Oklahoma City Won
The Thunder’s victory can be explained through several connected factors.
1. Exceptional Field-Goal Efficiency
Oklahoma City shot around 58% from the field.
That was the single biggest statistical advantage.
The Thunder converted 48 shots from 83 attempts, while Los Angeles made 40 from 86.
2. Holmgren’s Efficient Scoring
Holmgren produced 30 points on 13 field-goal attempts.
That gave Oklahoma City a highly efficient scoring source near the basket and beyond the arc.
3. Strong Ball Movement
The Thunder finished with 30 assists.
Gilgeous-Alexander alone recorded 11.
That allowed Oklahoma City to create quality scoring opportunities rather than depending only on isolation plays.
4. Rebounding Advantage
Oklahoma City won the rebounding battle 44-36.
The extra possessions helped support the Thunder’s offensive efficiency.
5. Balanced Scoring
The Thunder had four players reach at least 18 points.
Holmgren scored 30.
Joe scored 21.
Gilgeous-Alexander scored 20.
Williams scored 18.
That made it difficult for Los Angeles to concentrate its defensive attention on one player.
Why the Clippers Lost
Los Angeles had several positive individual performances, but the team could not sustain its offense early enough.
The biggest issue was first-half scoring.
The Clippers scored only 49 points before halftime.
Against an Oklahoma City team that was shooting nearly 60% from the field, falling behind by 20 points created an extremely difficult path back into the game.
Los Angeles also allowed the Thunder to score 128 points.
Even though the Clippers shot better from three, their overall field-goal percentage was much lower.
The Clippers also finished with fewer rebounds, fewer assists, and fewer blocks.
Their nine steals and 13 turnovers were identical to Oklahoma City’s numbers in those categories, so ball security was not the main reason for the defeat.
The bigger issue was efficiency and early-game execution.
Season Series: Thunder Sweep Clippers 3-0
The April meeting completed a 3-0 season sweep for Oklahoma City.
The three games were:
| Game | Result |
| November 5, 2025 | Thunder 126, Clippers 107 |
| December 19, 2025 | Thunder 122, Clippers 101 |
| April 9, 2026 | Thunder 128, Clippers 110 |
Oklahoma City therefore won all three meetings by double digits.
The scoring margins were:
- Game 1: 19 points
- Game 2: 21 points
- Game 3: 18 points
That produces an average winning margin of roughly 19.3 points across the three meetings.
The consistency is notable.
The Thunder did not simply edge the Clippers in one close matchup. They controlled all three games.
What the Season Sweep Tells Us
A three-game sweep should not automatically be treated as proof that one team would always defeat the other.
NBA matchups can change because of injuries, rotations, trades, rest, and playoff circumstances.
However, this particular season series showed a recurring advantage for Oklahoma City.
The Thunder consistently created separation.
They also demonstrated that they could win in different ways.
In the April game, Holmgren’s interior scoring and rebounding were central.
Gilgeous-Alexander controlled the offense through both scoring and passing.
The supporting cast then added enough production to prevent Los Angeles from focusing entirely on the two stars.
That is the type of team structure that becomes particularly valuable in postseason basketball.
The Importance of the No. 1 Seed
The victory had major implications for Oklahoma City.
The Thunder secured the NBA’s best regular-season record and the Western Conference’s top seed.
That meant home-court advantage throughout the postseason.
The NBA’s official recap confirmed that the win gave Oklahoma City the league’s best record and the Western Conference’s No. 1 seed. (NBA)
This made the game more than another regular-season matchup.
The Thunder were not simply trying to improve their win total.
They were securing a competitive advantage for the playoffs.
The victory also represented the third consecutive season in which Oklahoma City finished as the top seed in the Western Conference.
The Broader Meaning of the Player Statistics
The most useful way to read these numbers is not to focus only on the highest scoring player.
The game showed how individual statistics connected to team performance.
Holmgren’s 30 points mattered because he also grabbed 14 rebounds.
Gilgeous-Alexander’s 20 points mattered because he added 11 assists.
Williams’ 18 points mattered because he provided another scoring option.
Joe’s 21 points mattered because they came from the bench.
On the Clippers’ side, Leonard’s 20 points and 8 rebounds were valuable, but the team needed greater production around him.
This is why box-score analysis should look at multiple categories at once.
A points-only comparison can miss the reasons a team actually won.
Comparing the Leading Players
| Player | Team | Points | Key Contribution |
| Chet Holmgren | Thunder | 30 | 14 rebounds, elite shooting efficiency |
| Isaiah Joe | Thunder | 21 | Major bench scoring |
| Shai Gilgeous-Alexander | Thunder | 20 | 11 assists |
| Jalen Williams | Thunder | 18 | Secondary scoring |
| Kawhi Leonard | Clippers | 20 | 8 rebounds |
| Bennedict Mathurin | Clippers | 17 | Secondary scoring |
| Brook Lopez | Clippers | 16 | Interior and perimeter scoring |
| John Collins | Clippers | 12 | 9 rebounds |
This table shows the balance of the two teams.
Oklahoma City had four major contributors at 18 or more points.
Los Angeles had three players at 16 or more, but could not match the Thunder’s overall scoring depth.
What Fans Should Take From the Stats
For fans looking at the box score, several numbers stand out immediately.
First, Holmgren’s 30 points on 10-of-13 shooting was the most efficient major scoring performance of the game.
Second, Gilgeous-Alexander’s 11 assists show that his impact was not limited to scoring.
Third, the Thunder’s 44-36 rebounding advantage created another layer of control.
Fourth, Oklahoma City’s 58% shooting was substantially better than Los Angeles’ 47%.
Finally, the 20-point halftime advantage explains why the Clippers’ strong third quarter did not change the final result.
These statistics together provide a more complete picture than the final score alone.
Oklahoma City Thunder vs LA Clippers Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
The oklahoma city thunder vs la clippers match player stats reveal a game built around efficiency and balance.
Chet Holmgren was the standout performer with 30 points and 14 rebounds.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander controlled the offense with 20 points and 11 assists.
Jalen Williams scored 18, while Isaiah Joe added 21 from the bench.
For Los Angeles, Kawhi Leonard led with 20 points and 8 rebounds. Bennedict Mathurin scored 17, Brook Lopez had 16, and John Collins collected 9 rebounds.
The team numbers reinforce the individual performances.
Oklahoma City shot 58% from the field, collected 44 rebounds, recorded 30 assists, and blocked seven shots.
Los Angeles shot 47%, grabbed 36 rebounds, produced 27 assists, and recorded three blocks.
The Thunder also avoided a turnover disadvantage because both teams committed 13 turnovers.
The biggest difference was therefore not ball security.
It was efficiency, rebounding, and the ability to generate quality offense from several players.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the Thunder vs Clippers game?
Chet Holmgren was the top scorer with 30 points for Oklahoma City. He also grabbed 14 rebounds.
What was the final score between Oklahoma City and the Clippers?
The Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the LA Clippers 128-110 on April 9, 2026, at Intuit Dome.
How many points did Shai Gilgeous-Alexander score?
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander scored 20 points and recorded 11 assists.
How many points did Kawhi Leonard score?
Kawhi Leonard scored 20 points for the Clippers and added 8 rebounds.
Did Oklahoma City sweep the Clippers during the season?
Yes. Oklahoma City won all three meetings during the 2025-26 regular season, completing a 3-0 season sweep.
Which team had better shooting numbers?
Oklahoma City had the better overall field-goal percentage, shooting about 58% compared with approximately 47% for Los Angeles. The Clippers were better from three, shooting about 44% compared with 38% for the Thunder.
Conclusion
The oklahoma city thunder vs la clippers match player stats from April 9, 2026, show why Oklahoma City finished the regular season as the NBA’s top team.
The 128-110 victory was driven by outstanding shooting efficiency, strong rebounding, balanced scoring, and excellent playmaking.
Chet Holmgren delivered the biggest individual performance with 30 points and 14 rebounds. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander added 20 points and 11 assists, while Isaiah Joe and Jalen Williams gave the Thunder important scoring support.
The Clippers received 20 points from Kawhi Leonard, 17 from Bennedict Mathurin, and 16 from Brook Lopez, but their 47% overall shooting could not match Oklahoma City’s 58%.
The first half ultimately decided the contest. Oklahoma City built a 69-49 lead before Los Angeles responded with a stronger third quarter. The Thunder then answered in the fourth and closed the game without allowing the comeback to develop further.
The victory also completed Oklahoma City’s 3-0 season sweep over Los Angeles and secured the league’s best regular-season record.
From a statistical perspective, the most important lesson is that the result was not created by one number. Holmgren’s efficiency, Gilgeous-Alexander’s playmaking, the Thunder’s rebounding advantage, their 30 assists, and their balanced scoring all contributed to the outcome.
That combination made Oklahoma City too efficient and too difficult to contain over four quarters.
