San Antonio Spurs vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats
The san antonio spurs vs dallas mavericks match player stats from the February 8, 2026 NBA matchup provide a detailed look at how individual performances, team efficiency, and key moments shaped the final result. The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Dallas Mavericks 138-125 at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, using outstanding offensive execution, strong rebounding, and a dominant all-around performance from Stephon Castle to secure another victory in the season series.
This matchup was more than just a box score comparison. It showed the difference between a team playing with consistent offensive rhythm and a team trying to keep pace through individual scoring bursts. The Spurs controlled large portions of the game with efficient shooting, interior defense, and improved ball movement, while the Mavericks found success through bench scoring and three-point shooting but struggled to slow down San Antonio’s attack.
The final score reflected the overall flow of the contest. San Antonio scored 39 points in the first quarter, added 42 in the second, and built enough separation before Dallas attempted a late push. The Mavericks responded with competitive scoring throughout the game, but the Spurs’ early offensive advantage proved too difficult to overcome.
This article breaks down the complete player performances, team statistics, tactical differences, standout contributors, and important lessons from this NBA matchup.
Game Overview: San Antonio Spurs vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats
The February 8, 2026 meeting between the San Antonio Spurs and Dallas Mavericks took place during the NBA regular season at Frost Bank Center. The Spurs entered the game with a stronger record and home-court advantage, while the Mavericks were looking to improve their away performance.
Match Summary
| Category | Details |
| Game | San Antonio Spurs vs Dallas Mavericks |
| Date | February 8, 2026 |
| League | NBA |
| Venue | Frost Bank Center, San Antonio, Texas |
| Attendance | 18,617 |
| Final Score | San Antonio Spurs 138, Dallas Mavericks 125 |
| Referees | Ed Malloy, Natalie Sago, John Conley |
| Season Series | Spurs lead 3-0 |
The Spurs entered the matchup with a 36-16 record, including a strong 19-6 home record. Dallas came into the game at 19-33 overall and 5-17 on the road, showing the challenges they had faced away from home.
San Antonio’s victory continued their control of the season series. The Spurs had already defeated Dallas twice before this meeting:
- Spurs 125, Mavericks 92 on October 23
- Spurs 135, Mavericks 123 on February 6
- Spurs 138, Mavericks 125 on February 8
The series demonstrated a clear matchup advantage for San Antonio, especially in offensive consistency and defensive disruption.
Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
The pace of the game was established immediately. San Antonio attacked aggressively from the opening minutes, creating pressure on Dallas defenders and forcing the Mavericks to play from behind.
| Quarter | Dallas Mavericks | San Antonio Spurs |
| Q1 | 32 | 39 |
| Q2 | 35 | 42 |
| Q3 | 24 | 33 |
| Q4 | 34 | 24 |
| Total | 125 | 138 |
The first half was the turning point. San Antonio scored 81 points before halftime, creating a 14-point advantage. Dallas remained competitive offensively but could not match the Spurs’ efficiency.
The third quarter extended the gap even further. San Antonio scored 33 points while holding Dallas to 24, creating enough separation that the Mavericks’ fourth-quarter improvement was not enough.
Dallas did win the final quarter 34-24, showing resilience, but the game had already been decided by San Antonio’s earlier offensive production.
Team Statistical Comparison
The team numbers explain why the Spurs controlled the matchup.
| Statistic | Dallas Mavericks | San Antonio Spurs |
| Field Goals | 46-105 | 55-99 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 44% | 56% |
| Three-Pointers | 15-37 | 14-35 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 41% | 40% |
| Free Throws | 18-24 | 14-20 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 75% | 70% |
| Rebounds | 41 | 52 |
| Assists | 35 | 34 |
| Turnovers | 7 | 16 |
| Steals | 10 | 5 |
| Blocks | 4 | 11 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 12 | 12 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 29 | 40 |
The biggest difference came from shooting efficiency and rebounding.
San Antonio converted 56% of its field-goal attempts compared with Dallas’ 44%. That 12-point shooting advantage created a significant scoring gap despite Dallas making one more three-pointer percentage-wise.
The Spurs also controlled the glass with 52 total rebounds, including 40 defensive rebounds. This limited Dallas’ second-chance opportunities and allowed San Antonio to control the tempo.
Another important factor was rim protection. The Spurs recorded 11 blocks compared with Dallas’ four. Defensive presence around the basket prevented easy scoring opportunities and forced the Mavericks to rely more heavily on perimeter shots.
According to basketball analytics principles, shooting efficiency and possession control are among the strongest indicators of game outcomes. Advanced basketball analysis often emphasizes effective field goal percentage, rebounding percentage, and turnover rate as important measures of team performance. More information about basketball statistical concepts can be found through Basketball Reference Statistics Glossary.
Spurs Offensive Breakdown
San Antonio’s offensive success came from balanced scoring rather than relying on one player. Several players contributed meaningful production, but Stephon Castle delivered the defining performance of the night.
Stephon Castle’s Historic Impact
Stephon Castle was the standout player for San Antonio, finishing with:
| Category | Performance |
| Minutes | 32 |
| Points | 40 |
| Field Goals | 15-19 |
| Three-Pointers | 3-5 |
| Free Throws | 7-10 |
| Rebounds | 12 |
| Assists | 12 |
| Turnovers | 6 |
| Steals | 3 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Plus/Minus | +30 |
Castle’s performance showed complete control of the game. He scored efficiently, created opportunities for teammates, and contributed defensively.
The combination of 40 points, 12 rebounds, and 12 assists highlighted his ability to impact multiple areas of the game. His 15 made field goals on 19 attempts showed exceptional shot selection and finishing ability.
The plus/minus statistic of +30 also showed how much better San Antonio performed while he was on the court. Plus/minus measures the team’s point differential when a player is playing, helping provide context beyond traditional scoring numbers.
Castle was not simply a scorer. His 12 assists demonstrated his role as a primary playmaker, helping the Spurs maintain offensive movement throughout the game.
Victor Wembanyama’s Complete Performance
Victor Wembanyama contributed another strong all-around performance for San Antonio.
| Category | Performance |
| Minutes | 27 |
| Points | 16 |
| Field Goals | 6-14 |
| Three-Pointers | 1-6 |
| Free Throws | 3-4 |
| Rebounds | 11 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Blocks | 3 |
| Turnovers | 0 |
| Plus/Minus | +3 |
Although Wembanyama was not the leading scorer, his defensive influence was significant. His 11 rebounds and three blocks helped the Spurs control the interior.
One of the most important parts of his performance was protecting the basket. Dallas players had difficulty finishing consistently near the rim because of his defensive positioning and length.
His ability to contribute without dominating possessions is an important part of San Antonio’s team structure. The Spurs can win games even when different players lead different statistical categories.
De’Aaron Fox Adds Stability
De’Aaron Fox provided efficient scoring and playmaking.
| Category | Performance |
| Minutes | 26 |
| Points | 15 |
| Field Goals | 7-13 |
| Three-Pointers | 1-4 |
| Rebounds | 2 |
| Assists | 5 |
| Turnovers | 3 |
| Plus/Minus | +11 |
Fox’s role was important because he helped maintain offensive pressure alongside Castle. His ability to attack defenders and create scoring opportunities gave Dallas another challenge to manage.
His 7-of-13 shooting showed reliable efficiency, allowing San Antonio to avoid depending on only one offensive option.
Devin Vassell’s Two-Way Contribution
Devin Vassell also played a major role in the Spurs’ victory.
| Category | Performance |
| Minutes | 30 |
| Points | 17 |
| Field Goals | 7-15 |
| Rebounds | 4 |
| Assists | 6 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Plus/Minus | +31 |
Vassell recorded the highest plus/minus on the team at +31, showing his impact on both ends of the floor.
His six assists reflected improved playmaking, while his scoring helped maintain pressure when Dallas attempted to make defensive adjustments.
The Spurs’ ability to receive strong performances from Castle, Wembanyama, Fox, and Vassell explains why their offense reached 138 points.
Dallas Mavericks Offensive Breakdown
The Dallas Mavericks entered the matchup needing efficient scoring from both their starters and supporting players. While several Mavericks contributed offensively, the team struggled to maintain the same level of efficiency as San Antonio.
The san antonio spurs vs dallas mavericks match player stats show that Dallas actually had strong individual scoring performances, especially from the bench, but the overall team shooting percentage and defensive challenges created the difference on the scoreboard.
Dallas finished the game with 125 points, which would normally be enough to compete in many NBA matchups. However, allowing San Antonio to shoot 56% from the field created a difficult situation. The Mavericks were forced to chase the game throughout the night, leading to inconsistent defensive possessions.
Klay Thompson Provides Veteran Scoring
Klay Thompson was one of Dallas’ most effective offensive players.
| Category | Performance |
| Minutes | 19 |
| Points | 19 |
| Field Goals | 6-14 |
| Three-Pointers | 4-10 |
| Free Throws | 3-3 |
| Rebounds | 1 |
| Assists | 2 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| Steals | 2 |
| Plus/Minus | +9 |
Thompson’s shooting remained a major positive for Dallas. He connected on four three-pointers and provided spacing that helped open driving lanes for teammates.
His +9 plus/minus was one of the better marks on the Mavericks roster, suggesting Dallas performed better during his minutes. However, his limited playing time meant his impact was not enough to change the overall result.
For a team trying to overcome a scoring deficit, outside shooting becomes extremely valuable. Thompson gave Dallas that element, but San Antonio’s interior dominance reduced the effectiveness of perimeter scoring alone.
Brandon Williams Delivers Strong Bench Production
Brandon Williams was another important contributor for Dallas.
| Category | Performance |
| Minutes | 24 |
| Points | 18 |
| Field Goals | 8-12 |
| Three-Pointers | 2-2 |
| Rebounds | 3 |
| Assists | 4 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Plus/Minus | -10 |
Williams provided one of Dallas’ most efficient scoring performances. Shooting 8-of-12 from the field and 2-of-2 from three-point range showed his ability to create offense without requiring a high number of attempts.
However, his -10 plus/minus indicated that Dallas still lost ground during his minutes despite his personal scoring success.
This highlights an important basketball lesson: individual efficiency does not always equal team success. A player can produce strong offensive numbers while the team struggles because of defensive issues, lineup combinations, or opponent performance.
Cooper Flagg’s Difficult Night
Cooper Flagg recorded a mixed performance against the Spurs.
| Category | Performance |
| Minutes | 26 |
| Points | 14 |
| Field Goals | 5-12 |
| Three-Pointers | 2-3 |
| Free Throws | 2-2 |
| Rebounds | 4 |
| Assists | 4 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| Plus/Minus | -31 |
Flagg contributed in multiple areas, including scoring, rebounding, and playmaking. However, his -31 plus/minus was the lowest among Dallas players, showing the challenges the Mavericks faced while he was on the floor.
The number does not mean one player alone caused the result. Plus/minus is a team-based statistic influenced by teammates, opponents, and game situations. Still, it provides useful context about lineup effectiveness.
Max Christie Adds Perimeter Scoring
Max Christie helped Dallas maintain offensive pressure.
| Category | Performance |
| Minutes | 27 |
| Points | 17 |
| Field Goals | 6-11 |
| Three-Pointers | 3-7 |
| Rebounds | 3 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Plus/Minus | -23 |
Christie’s 17 points helped keep Dallas competitive, particularly through perimeter shooting.
His three made three-pointers showed Dallas had success from outside, but the team could not consistently convert those opportunities into defensive stops.
Marvin Bagley III Controls the Boards
Marvin Bagley III delivered one of Dallas’ strongest rebounding performances.
| Category | Performance |
| Minutes | 24 |
| Points | 16 |
| Field Goals | 6-14 |
| Rebounds | 12 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 8 |
| Blocks | 4 |
| Plus/Minus | -19 |
Bagley’s eight offensive rebounds were especially valuable. He created extra possessions and gave Dallas opportunities that many teams would struggle to generate.
His four blocks also showed defensive activity, but the overall team defense could not match San Antonio’s efficiency.
Tyus Jones Provides Playmaking Off the Bench
Tyus Jones played a smaller role offensively but impacted the game through passing.
| Category | Performance |
| Minutes | 17 |
| Points | 4 |
| Assists | 7 |
| Turnovers | 0 |
| Plus/Minus | +18 |
Jones recorded the best plus/minus among Dallas players. His ability to organize the offense and create opportunities for teammates helped Dallas during his minutes.
His performance shows why advanced box score analysis requires looking beyond points. Passing efficiency, ball security, and lineup impact can reveal contributions that traditional scoring statistics miss.
San Antonio Spurs vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats: Key Statistical Differences
When analyzing the complete matchup, several statistical areas explain why San Antonio earned the victory.
1. Shooting Efficiency Decided the Game
The biggest difference was field-goal percentage.
San Antonio:
- 55 made shots on 99 attempts
- 56% shooting
Dallas:
- 46 made shots on 105 attempts
- 44% shooting
The Spurs made nine more field goals while taking six fewer attempts. That efficiency created a significant advantage.
2. Rebounding Created Extra Control
San Antonio won the rebounding battle 52-41.
The difference was especially noticeable defensively:
- Spurs defensive rebounds: 40
- Mavericks defensive rebounds: 29
By securing defensive rebounds, San Antonio prevented second opportunities and started fast-break opportunities.
3. Interior Defense Changed the Game
The Spurs recorded 11 blocks compared with Dallas’ four.
This defensive advantage affected shot selection. Dallas had to adjust around San Antonio’s size, especially near the basket.
Victor Wembanyama’s presence was important, but the entire Spurs defensive unit contributed through positioning and help defense.
4. Turnovers Tell an Interesting Story
Dallas actually protected the basketball better.
Turnovers:
- Dallas Mavericks: 7
- San Antonio Spurs: 16
Usually, fewer turnovers create an advantage. However, Dallas could not fully benefit because San Antonio’s shooting efficiency and rebounding advantage outweighed the turnover difference.
This is a useful reminder that basketball games are decided by multiple factors rather than one statistic.
Tactical Analysis: Why San Antonio Won
The Spurs’ victory came from several strategic advantages.
Offensive Balance
San Antonio did not depend on one scorer. Castle led the way, but four players reached double figures among the starters.
This made defensive planning difficult for Dallas because every lineup combination presented multiple threats.
Ball Movement
The Spurs recorded 34 assists, showing strong offensive cooperation.
Castle’s 12 assists were particularly important because he created scoring chances while remaining aggressive as a scorer.
Defensive Versatility
San Antonio’s 11 blocks demonstrated their ability to defend the paint.
The Spurs used size and athleticism to challenge shots without completely abandoning perimeter coverage.
Strong Home Performance
The Spurs improved their home record to 19-6 after the victory.
Playing at Frost Bank Center appeared to support their offensive confidence, as they scored 81 points in the first half.
What the Match Reveals About Both Teams
This game provided useful information beyond the final score.
For San Antonio, the performance showed the value of having multiple young players capable of creating offense. Castle’s development as a scorer and playmaker added another dimension to a team already featuring Wembanyama’s defensive presence.
For Dallas, the game showed positive signs from bench players and perimeter shooters. The Mavericks produced 125 points and received valuable contributions from several reserves. However, improving defensive consistency and overall shooting efficiency remained important areas.
Player Comparison Summary
| Area | Advantage |
| Leading Scorer | Stephon Castle, Spurs |
| Best Playmaking Performance | Stephon Castle, Spurs |
| Best Rebounding Performance | Victor Wembanyama / Marvin Bagley III |
| Best Shooting Efficiency | Stephon Castle |
| Best Plus/Minus | Devin Vassell (+31) |
| Best Dallas Bench Impact | Brandon Williams |
| Best Dallas Plus/Minus | Tyus Jones (+18) |
| Defensive Advantage | San Antonio Spurs |
The statistical story of the game is clear: Dallas had individual bright spots, but San Antonio’s complete team performance produced the difference.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the Spurs vs Mavericks game on February 8, 2026?
Stephon Castle was the leading scorer for the San Antonio Spurs with 40 points. He also recorded 12 rebounds and 12 assists, creating one of the most complete performances of the matchup.
What was the final score between the Spurs and Mavericks?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Dallas Mavericks 138-125 at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio.
How many points did Victor Wembanyama score against the Mavericks?
Victor Wembanyama scored 16 points while adding 11 rebounds and three blocks.
Which Mavericks player scored the most points?
Klay Thompson led Dallas with 19 points, while Brandon Williams followed with 18 points.
Which team won the season series between San Antonio and Dallas?
The San Antonio Spurs won the season series, leading 3-0 after the February 8 matchup.
Why did the Spurs win despite having more turnovers?
The Spurs overcame their 16 turnovers because they shot much more efficiently, controlled rebounds, and protected the rim better than Dallas.
Conclusion
The san antonio spurs vs dallas mavericks match player stats from February 8, 2026 highlight how complete team performance can overcome individual scoring efforts. San Antonio’s 138-125 victory was built on efficient shooting, strong rebounding, defensive protection, and outstanding leadership from Stephon Castle.
Castle’s 40-point triple-double performance was the defining moment of the game, but the win was not created by one player alone. Victor Wembanyama controlled the defensive side with his rebounding and shot-blocking ability, while De’Aaron Fox and Devin Vassell provided reliable scoring and playmaking support.
Dallas showed competitive effort through strong bench performances from players such as Klay Thompson, Brandon Williams, Marvin Bagley III, and Tyus Jones. The Mavericks also shot well from three-point range and protected the basketball effectively. However, their lower field-goal efficiency and inability to slow down San Antonio’s offense created too large of a disadvantage.
The matchup also demonstrated why complete box score analysis requires looking beyond points scored. Rebounding, shooting efficiency, defensive impact, assists, and plus/minus numbers all contributed to understanding how the game was decided.
For fans analyzing NBA performances, this game serves as a strong example of how individual statistics connect with team strategy. A player’s impact is measured not only by scoring but also by how their actions influence the entire game.
