Diamondbacks vs Milwaukee Brewers Match Player Stats

The diamondbacks vs milwaukee brewers match player stats from April 30, 2026, tell the story of a game that quickly moved away from Arizona and became one of Milwaukee’s most complete offensive performances. The Brewers defeated the Diamondbacks 13-1 at American Family Field, collecting 14 hits while limiting Arizona to six. William Contreras led Milwaukee’s attack with four hits, four RBIs, three runs and a home run, while Sal Frelick also went deep. On the pitching side, the Brewers combined for 13 strikeouts and allowed only one earned run.

This was not simply a case of one team getting a few timely hits. The statistical gap appeared across several areas, including total runs, hits, walks, strikeouts, home runs, pitching efficiency and the ability to maintain pressure throughout the game. Arizona managed only one run, while Milwaukee scored in six different innings.

Data note: The statistics in this article are based on the game data supplied for the April 30, 2026 matchup. The supplied dataset contains an apparent date inconsistency in the series listing and also includes later-season standings that do not match the April game date. For that reason, this analysis focuses on the individual game statistics rather than treating those conflicting fields as additional game context.

Diamondbacks vs Milwaukee Brewers Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The final score was Milwaukee Brewers 13, Arizona Diamondbacks 1.

The game was played at American Family Field in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with an attendance of 26,849. The listed game time was 2 hours and 50 minutes.

Category	Diamondbacks	Brewers
Runs	1	13
Hits	6	14
Errors	2	0
Home Runs	0	2
Walks	2	6
Strikeouts	13	6
RISP	2-for-5	4-for-16
Left on Base	6	6

The most striking number is obviously the 12-run difference. However, the box score becomes more interesting when the individual statistics are examined.

Milwaukee had only a modest advantage in hits, 14 to 6, but converted its offensive opportunities into runs far more effectively. The Brewers scored 13 times despite going 4-for-16 with runners in scoring position. That means their scoring was not dependent exclusively on traditional RISP production.

The Brewers also hit two home runs, while Arizona did not leave the yard.

Arizona’s offensive problems were equally clear. The Diamondbacks struck out 13 times and received only two walks. Their six hits produced just one run.

How the Brewers Built a 13-1 Lead

Milwaukee did not rely on one massive inning to win this game. The Brewers scored in the first, third, fourth, sixth, seventh and eighth innings.

That distribution matters because it demonstrates sustained offensive pressure.

The scoring breakdown supplied for the game was:

• First inning: 3 Brewers runs
• Third inning: 3 Brewers runs
• Fourth inning: 2 Brewers runs
• Sixth inning: 3 Brewers runs
• Seventh inning: 1 Brewers run
• Eighth inning: 1 Brewers run
• Fourth inning: 1 Diamondbacks run

Arizona therefore never established a sustained offensive response after Milwaukee opened the game with three runs.

The Brewers’ ability to continue scoring also prevented the Diamondbacks from making the game competitive later. Once Milwaukee had established a substantial advantage, its pitching staff continued to suppress Arizona’s offense.

William Contreras Was the Offensive Standout

Among all the diamondbacks vs milwaukee brewers match player stats, William Contreras produced arguably the most influential individual line.

His numbers were:

• 4 at-bats
• 4 hits
• 3 runs
• 4 RBIs
• 1 home run
• 1 walk

Contreras reached base five times through his four hits and one walk. That is an exceptional offensive contribution in a single game.

His home run came in the third inning and was listed at 419 feet. More importantly, it was a two-run homer that helped extend Milwaukee’s early advantage.

A hitter who contributes four hits and four RBIs is already having a major game. Adding three runs scored and a home run makes the performance even more influential.

Contreras was therefore involved directly in a large portion of Milwaukee’s offensive production.

Brice Turang Created Pressure in Multiple Ways

Brice Turang also produced a highly effective game.

His line:

• 3 at-bats
• 2 hits
• 3 runs
• 1 RBI
• 2 walks

The two walks are particularly important.

A player does not need to produce a home run to have a major impact on a box score. Turang reached base four times in the supplied statistics and scored three runs.

That combination helped Milwaukee maintain traffic on the bases.

His performance also shows why looking only at batting average or home runs can miss important aspects of an individual game. Turang’s ability to reach base, advance the offense and eventually score contributed substantially to the 13-run total.

Tyler Black Added Three RBIs

Tyler Black recorded:

• 4 at-bats
• 2 hits
• 3 RBIs
• 1 walk

Black did not score a run in the supplied line, but his production was valuable because he helped convert opportunities into runs.

His two hits and walk also meant that his contribution was not limited to one successful plate appearance.

The supplied data lists a double for Black, adding extra-base production to his offensive line.

Jorge Bauers Contributed Two Runs

Jorge Bauers finished with:

• 4 at-bats
• 1 hit
• 2 runs
• 1 RBI
• 1 walk

At first glance, one hit may not look like a major offensive contribution. But the rest of his line explains why the Brewers continued to generate runs.

Bauers scored twice and drew a walk, meaning he contributed to the offensive flow even without collecting multiple hits.

This is one reason a complete box-score analysis should consider runs and walks alongside hits.

Luis Rengifo Provided Extra-Base Production

Luis Rengifo went 1-for-5 with:

• 1 hit
• 3 RBIs
• 1 double

His hit total was modest, but his RBI total was not.

Rengifo’s double also gave Milwaukee another form of extra-base production beyond its two home runs.

His performance is a good example of how a player’s value in one game can be driven by the timing and impact of his plate appearances rather than simply by the number of hits.

Sal Frelick Added Another Home Run

Sal Frelick finished with:

• 5 at-bats
• 1 hit
• 1 run
• 1 RBI
• 1 home run

His solo home run came in the seventh inning and was listed at 402 feet.

The timing was useful for Milwaukee because it showed that the offense was still capable of generating power well after the game had been decided.

With Contreras hitting a 419-foot home run earlier and Frelick adding a 402-foot homer later, Milwaukee demonstrated two different stages of power production.

Arizona’s Best Offensive Performers

The Diamondbacks had far fewer offensive positives, but three players stood out in the supplied statistics.

Corbin Carroll

Corbin Carroll recorded:

• 3 at-bats
• 1 run
• 2 hits
• 0 RBIs
• 1 double

Carroll was one of Arizona’s most productive hitters by hit total.

His double represented the Diamondbacks’ extra-base hit highlighted in the supplied data. However, his two hits were not enough to generate sustained scoring.

Ildemaro Vargas

Ildemaro Vargas went:

• 4 at-bats
• 2 hits
• 0 runs
• 0 RBIs

Vargas matched Carroll for the team’s highest hit total among the highlighted Arizona players.

The problem was that those hits did not translate into runs.

This distinction is important. A player can perform well individually while the team’s overall offense struggles to capitalize.

Lourdes Gurriel Jr.

Lourdes Gurriel Jr. recorded:

• 4 at-bats
• 2 hits
• 0 runs
• 1 RBI

His RBI accounted for Arizona’s only run in the game.

Gurriel’s two hits gave him a strong individual result compared with the team’s overall offensive output, but the Diamondbacks could not build a larger rally around him.

The Arizona Offense Had a Difficult Night

The team batting line explains the final score:

32 at-bats, 1 run, 6 hits, 1 RBI, 0 home runs, 2 walks and 13 strikeouts.

The 13 strikeouts stand out immediately.

Arizona’s hitters had relatively few opportunities to put the ball in play, and Milwaukee’s pitching staff consistently finished plate appearances without allowing contact.

The Diamondbacks also had only two walks.

That means the team generated just eight combined hits and walks while striking out 13 times. Against a pitching staff that ultimately allowed only one earned run, that was not enough offensive traffic.

Arizona did go 2-for-5 with runners in scoring position, which is a respectable percentage. But the sample was small, and the team simply did not create enough total opportunities.

Milwaukee’s Pitching Was the Other Half of the Story

The Brewers’ offensive performance received most of the attention because of the 13 runs, but the pitching line was equally important.

Milwaukee’s pitching staff finished with:

• 9.0 innings
• 6 hits allowed
• 1 run allowed
• 1 earned run allowed
• 2 walks
• 13 strikeouts
• 0 home runs allowed

That is a dominant team pitching line.

The Brewers allowed only six hits and two walks while striking out 13 hitters.

Even more importantly, they did not allow a home run.

The combination of strikeouts, limited walks and no home runs made it difficult for Arizona to generate large innings.

S. Drohan Set the Tone

1. Drohan was credited with the win.

His line:

• 4.0 innings
• 5 hits
• 1 earned run
• 4 strikeouts
• 0 walks

The most impressive part of the line is the absence of walks.

Drohan allowed five hits but did not issue a free pass. That forced Arizona to earn its opportunities through hits rather than receiving additional baserunners through walks.

He also recorded four strikeouts during his four innings.

The Brewers then received five scoreless innings from the bullpen and supporting pitchers.

Milwaukee’s Bullpen Closed the Door

The supplied pitching support lists B. Woodruff, G. Anderson, T. Megill, B. Fitzpatrick and J. Woodford as combining for:

• 5.0 innings
• 1 hit
• 0 earned runs

That is a remarkable finishing effort.

Once Milwaukee established a large lead, the pitching staff did not allow Arizona to find a path back into the game.

The five relievers collectively allowed just one hit across five innings.

That meant Arizona’s hitters were unable to take advantage of the later innings, even with the game already heavily tilted toward Milwaukee.

M. Soroka Had a Difficult Start

1. Soroka was charged with the loss.

His line:

• 3.0 innings
• 10 hits
• 8 earned runs
• 2 strikeouts
• 2 walks

The biggest issue was the number of hits allowed.

Soroka surrendered 10 hits in only three innings, which created constant traffic for Milwaukee’s lineup.

The eight earned runs also meant that most of the early damage was charged directly to his pitching line.

Once Milwaukee built its advantage, Arizona’s pitching staff did not allow another major offensive explosion, but the early deficit was already too large to overcome.

Comparing the Starting Pitchers

Statistic	S. Drohan	M. Soroka
Innings	4.0	3.0
Hits Allowed	5	10
Earned Runs	1	8
Strikeouts	4	2
Walks	0	2
Result	Win	Loss

The contrast is clear.

Drohan worked one additional inning, allowed fewer than half as many earned runs and did not walk a batter.

Soroka faced constant pressure and gave up 10 hits in three innings.

The game therefore became a matchup between an Arizona pitching staff struggling to contain contact and a Milwaukee pitching staff consistently limiting scoring.

Why the Hit Difference Alone Does Not Explain the Score

Milwaukee had 14 hits compared with Arizona’s six.

That is a major advantage, but the difference between 14 and six does not, by itself, explain a 13-1 score.

The more revealing statistics are the combination of:

1. Two Brewers home runs
2. Six Brewers walks
3. Thirteen Arizona strikeouts
4. Ten hits allowed by Soroka in three innings
5. Six separate scoring innings for Milwaukee
6. Only two Arizona walks
7. No Brewers errors
8. No Arizona home runs

The Brewers created more ways to reach base and more ways to advance runners.

Arizona’s offense had fewer opportunities and struggled to sustain rallies.

The Importance of Home Runs in This Game

Milwaukee hit two home runs.

William Contreras hit a 419-foot two-run homer in the third inning.

Sal Frelick hit a 402-foot solo homer in the seventh.

Arizona hit no home runs.

Home runs were not the only reason Milwaukee won, but they helped create separation and provided immediate scoring.

Contreras’s homer was particularly significant because it produced two runs and came during an inning in which Milwaukee was already applying offensive pressure.

Frelick’s later homer demonstrated that Milwaukee’s power remained present throughout the contest.

Milwaukee’s Offensive Depth Made the Difference

One of the strongest observations from these statistics is that the Brewers did not depend entirely on one hitter.

Contreras had four hits.

Turang had two hits and two walks.

Black had two hits and three RBIs.

Rengifo had three RBIs and a double.

Frelick hit a home run.

Bauers scored twice and walked.

This distribution made Milwaukee difficult to contain.

If one hitter failed, another player could extend the inning or produce a scoring opportunity.

That depth is a major reason why the Brewers were able to score 13 runs.

Arizona Had Individual Success Without Team Success

The Diamondbacks’ highlighted hitters combined for several positive results.

Carroll had two hits.

Vargas had two hits.

Gurriel Jr. had two hits and Arizona’s only RBI.

Yet Arizona scored only once.

This illustrates an important distinction when evaluating diamondbacks vs milwaukee brewers match player stats.

Individual batting statistics can look respectable even when the overall offense fails.

Arizona’s highlighted players accounted for six hits, but the team could not string enough productive plate appearances together to turn those hits into runs.

That is the difference between isolated success and offensive execution as a team.

RISP Statistics Need Context

Milwaukee went 4-for-16 with runners in scoring position.

Arizona went 2-for-5.

At first glance, Arizona actually had the better RISP percentage.

That does not mean Arizona had the better clutch offense in this game.

Milwaukee had 16 RISP opportunities in the supplied data, compared with five for Arizona. The Brewers created far more situations in which a runner was already in scoring position.

This is an important lesson when interpreting baseball statistics.

A percentage without its underlying opportunity count can be misleading.

Milwaukee’s 25% RISP rate may not look spectacular, but the Brewers created enough total offensive opportunities to score 13 runs.

Runs and Hits Were Distributed Across the Brewers Lineup

Milwaukee’s 14 hits were not concentrated entirely in one player.

Contreras accounted for four.

Turang and Black each had two.

Other players contributed additional hits, including Rengifo and Frelick.

The result was a lineup that kept producing contact from multiple spots.

This is especially valuable in a game where the opposing starter is struggling.

Once Arizona’s pitching began allowing frequent hits, Milwaukee’s lineup continued to apply pressure rather than allowing the inning to end quickly.

Defensive Execution Also Favored Milwaukee

The Diamondbacks committed two errors.

The Brewers committed none.

Errors were not listed as the primary reason for the final result, but defensive reliability matters in a game where the offense is already creating pressure.

Milwaukee’s clean defensive performance meant the Brewers did not give Arizona extra opportunities.

Arizona, meanwhile, had to deal with the combined challenge of limiting Milwaukee’s hitters and avoiding additional damage from defensive mistakes.

What the Box Score Says About Game Flow

The inning-by-inning scoring provides one of the clearest ways to understand the game.

Milwaukee scored three runs in the first inning.

That immediately placed Arizona in a difficult position.

The Brewers then added three more in the third, including Contreras’s two-run home run.

Two additional runs came in the fourth.

Three more arrived in the sixth.

Frelick’s home run added another in the seventh.

Milwaukee finished its scoring with one run in the eighth.

Arizona scored only once, in the fourth.

The pattern is therefore not one of a close game that suddenly changed late. It was a game in which Milwaukee repeatedly added to its advantage.

Key Player Comparison

Player	Team	Hits	Runs	RBIs	HR
W. Contreras	Brewers	4	3	4	1
B. Turang	Brewers	2	3	1	0
T. Black	Brewers	2	0	3	0
J. Bauers	Brewers	1	2	1	0
L. Rengifo	Brewers	1	0	3	0
S. Frelick	Brewers	1	1	1	1
C. Carroll	Diamondbacks	2	1	0	0
I. Vargas	Diamondbacks	2	0	0	0
L. Gurriel Jr.	Diamondbacks	2	0	1	0

Contreras clearly stands at the top of this comparison because he led Milwaukee in hits, RBIs and home runs while also scoring three times.

Arizona’s leading hitters reached the same two-hit mark, but none produced a home run and only Gurriel Jr. recorded an RBI among the three highlighted players.

Most Important Statistical Takeaways

Several conclusions stand out from the complete game data.

1. Milwaukee controlled the offensive volume

The Brewers recorded 14 hits and six walks.

Arizona recorded six hits and two walks.

That created a major difference in baserunner generation.

2. Contreras had the most complete individual performance

Four hits, four RBIs, three runs and a home run made Contreras the game’s leading offensive performer.

3. Milwaukee’s pitching prevented a comeback

The Brewers allowed one earned run and six hits across nine innings.

4. Arizona’s strikeout total was costly

Thirteen strikeouts reduced the number of balls put into play and limited the Diamondbacks’ chances to build sustained rallies.

5. Milwaukee’s offense stayed productive after the early innings

The Brewers scored in six different innings rather than relying on one isolated burst.

6. Arizona’s best hitters could not turn hits into runs

Carroll, Vargas and Gurriel Jr. each recorded two hits, but the Diamondbacks scored only once.

What These Stats Mean for Player Evaluation

A useful player evaluation should not focus on one number.

For hitters, the most informative approach is to consider hits, runs, RBIs, walks, extra-base hits and home runs together.

For pitchers, innings, hits allowed, earned runs, walks and strikeouts provide a much clearer picture than the win or loss alone.

For example, Drohan earned the win, but his four innings were only part of Milwaukee’s pitching success. The five scoreless innings that followed were critical.

Likewise, Contreras’s four-hit performance stands out, but his production was amplified by the contributions of Turang, Black, Rengifo, Bauers and Frelick.

This is why a complete box score is more useful than a simple final score.

A Practical Way to Read a Baseball Box Score

When analyzing future games, readers can use a simple process.

First, look at the final score and total hits.

Second, compare walks and strikeouts.

Third, check home runs and extra-base hits.

Fourth, review the starting pitchers.

Fifth, examine bullpen performance.

Sixth, identify which hitters contributed runs and RBIs.

Finally, look at RISP statistics while considering the number of opportunities.

This approach helps prevent one statistic from dominating the entire interpretation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was the best player in the Diamondbacks vs Brewers game?

William Contreras was the standout offensive player. He recorded four hits, three runs, four RBIs, one home run and one walk.

What was the final score of the Diamondbacks vs Brewers game?

The Milwaukee Brewers defeated the Arizona Diamondbacks 13-1.

How many hits did the Brewers have?

Milwaukee recorded 14 hits.

How many home runs did the Brewers hit?

The Brewers hit two home runs. William Contreras hit one in the third inning, while Sal Frelick hit one in the seventh.

Who was the winning pitcher?

1. Drohan earned the win after pitching four innings, allowing five hits and one earned run while recording four strikeouts and no walks.

How many strikeouts did the Diamondbacks have?

Arizona hitters struck out 13 times.

Conclusion

The diamondbacks vs milwaukee brewers match player stats show a game dominated by Milwaukee from both sides of the ball.

The Brewers scored 13 runs on 14 hits, received six walks, hit two home runs and struck out only six times as a team. Their pitching staff then held Arizona to six hits and one earned run while recording 13 strikeouts.

William Contreras was the central offensive figure with four hits, four RBIs, three runs and a home run. Brice Turang added two hits, three runs and two walks, while Tyler Black supplied three RBIs. Sal Frelick’s seventh-inning home run provided another power highlight.

For Arizona, Corbin Carroll, Ildemaro Vargas and Lourdes Gurriel Jr. each collected two hits, but those individual contributions did not translate into sustained team scoring. The Diamondbacks’ 13 strikeouts and only two walks made it difficult to generate enough opportunities.

From a statistical perspective, the biggest lesson is that the 13-1 result was not caused by one isolated factor. Milwaukee combined frequent contact, power, walks, timely scoring and excellent pitching. Arizona’s individual hitters had some success, but the team could not turn that success into enough runs.

The supplied data therefore paints a clear picture: Milwaukee’s advantage was both offensive and defensive, and the Brewers maintained that advantage throughout the game rather than relying on one decisive late inning.