Denver Nuggets vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats

The denver nuggets vs utah jazz match player stats from April 2, 2026, tell the story of a Denver team that combined efficient shooting, strong rebounding, and Nikola Jokic’s all-around play to defeat Utah 130-117 at Delta Center in Salt Lake City. Jamal Murray led Denver with 37 points, while Jokic produced 15 points, 17 rebounds, and 12 assists. For Utah, Brice Sensabaugh scored 28 points and Kyle Filipowski added 25 points and 12 rebounds, but the Jazz could not match Denver’s offensive efficiency over four quarters.

The final score was Denver Nuggets 130, Utah Jazz 117. Denver entered the matchup with a 49-28 record and a 25-15 road mark, while Utah was listed at 21-56 overall and 13-27 at home. The result also completed a four-game season sweep for Denver, with the Nuggets winning all four meetings between the teams.

This game is particularly useful to study because the 13-point final margin does not tell the entire story. Utah actually won the third quarter 36-29, but Denver’s 39-point opening quarter and 33-point fourth quarter gave the Nuggets enough offensive separation to control the result.

Denver Nuggets vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats

The most important individual numbers from the game were spread across several categories rather than concentrated in scoring alone.

Denver’s leading performers

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Other Key Stats	Minutes
Jamal Murray	37	5	5	1 STL, 2 BLK	37
Nikola Jokic	15	17	12	5 TO	33
Cameron Johnson	19	9	6	2 STL	35
Christian Braun	18	6	4		31
Jonas Valanciunas	13	6	0	7-8 FT	13
Bruce Brown	11	3	0	4 STL	27
Aaron Gordon	6	2	2	1 STL	28
Tim Hardaway Jr.	3	1	0		10

Murray was the obvious scoring standout. His 37 points were the highest individual total in the game, and he did so while also contributing five rebounds and five assists.

Jokic’s performance was different but equally important. His 15 points were not the headline number, yet his 17 rebounds and 12 assists made him central to Denver’s overall offensive structure. His triple-double also illustrates why evaluating a player solely through scoring can miss a large part of his impact.

Cameron Johnson delivered one of the most balanced supporting performances. He recorded 19 points, nine rebounds, six assists, and two steals in 35 minutes.

Christian Braun contributed 18 points, six rebounds, and four assists, giving Denver another reliable scoring and playmaking option.

Utah Jazz Player Statistics

Utah received strong individual production from several players, particularly Brice Sensabaugh and Kyle Filipowski.

Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Other Key Stats	Minutes
Brice Sensabaugh	28	6	4	6-9 3PT	33
Kyle Filipowski	25	12	3	3-8 3PT	31
Kennedy Chandler	16	5	6		32
Ace Bailey	12	1	2		33
John Konchar	12	10	6	2 STL	29
Cody Williams	9	2	9	1 STL	38
Oscar Tshiebwe	8	7	0	1 STL	21
Bez Mbeng	7	1	2		23

Sensabaugh was Utah’s leading scorer with 28 points. His three-point shooting was especially notable because he made six of nine attempts from beyond the arc. That gave Utah a major perimeter scoring source even though the team as a whole shot only 32 percent from three-point range.

Filipowski combined scoring and rebounding effectively. He finished with 25 points and 12 rebounds, giving Utah an inside presence while also making three of eight three-point attempts.

Cody Williams had a relatively modest scoring night with nine points, but his nine assists were the highest assist total for Utah. That distinction matters because Utah finished with 32 team assists, two more than Denver’s 30.

John Konchar also provided a well-rounded bench performance with 12 points, 10 rebounds, six assists, and two steals.

How Denver Won the Game

Denver’s victory can be explained through a combination of shooting efficiency, free throws, rebounding, and quarter-by-quarter scoring.

The Nuggets made 44 of 91 field-goal attempts, or 48 percent. Utah also made 44 field goals, but needed 95 attempts to reach that number and finished at 46 percent.

That difference may appear small, but over 91 to 95 attempts it becomes meaningful. Denver generated the same number of made field goals with fewer attempts while also shooting more efficiently from three-point range and the free-throw line.

Denver shot 16 of 39 from three, good for 41 percent. Utah made 12 of 37 three-point attempts, or 32 percent.

The free-throw difference was also significant. Denver converted 26 of 31 attempts, an 84 percent rate. Utah made 17 of 25, or 68 percent.

Those three efficiency categories give a clear picture of why Denver reached 130 points.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The scoring progression provides another useful way to understand the matchup.

Quarter	Denver	Utah
First	39	28
Second	29	26
Third	29	36
Fourth	33	27
Total	130	117

First quarter: Denver establishes control

Denver opened the game with 39 points, compared with Utah’s 28.

That 11-point first-quarter advantage created the foundation for the final result. Denver did not need to dominate every subsequent period because it had already established a meaningful cushion.

A 39-point opening quarter also demonstrates the importance of offensive rhythm. Denver’s overall shooting numbers were strong, and the opening period helped set the tone for the game.

Second quarter: Nuggets maintain the advantage

The second quarter was closer, with Denver scoring 29 and Utah scoring 26.

Utah reduced the deficit only slightly because Denver continued to score at a strong rate. The Nuggets therefore entered halftime with control rather than allowing the Jazz to turn the game into a one-possession contest.

Third quarter: Utah responds

The third quarter was Utah’s strongest period.

The Jazz scored 36 points while holding Denver to 29. This was a seven-point swing in Utah’s favor and showed that the game was not simply a one-sided contest from beginning to end.

Sensabaugh and Filipowski were particularly important to Utah’s scoring production, while the team’s overall ball movement helped produce 32 assists.

However, Utah still had to overcome the first-half deficit.

Fourth quarter: Denver closes firmly

Denver answered Utah’s third-quarter surge by scoring 33 points in the fourth quarter.

Utah scored 27.

That six-point fourth-quarter advantage prevented the Jazz from completing the comeback. Instead of allowing Utah’s momentum to carry into the final minutes, Denver restored offensive control.

This quarter is an important part of the statistical story because strong teams often distinguish themselves not by avoiding every run but by responding effectively after an opponent creates momentum.

Jamal Murray’s 37-Point Performance

Jamal Murray was the leading scorer in the matchup with 37 points.

His contribution went beyond the scoring column. Murray also recorded five rebounds, five assists, one steal, and two blocks while playing 37 minutes.

His scoring accounted for more than one-quarter of Denver’s 130 points.

That production was especially important because Jokic did not need to carry the scoring burden. Instead, Jokic could focus on creating possessions through rebounds and assists while Murray provided the primary scoring punch.

The combination produced a balanced offensive hierarchy. Murray handled a significant scoring role, while Jokic influenced nearly every other area of the game.

Nikola Jokic’s Triple-Double Impact

Jokic finished with 15 points, 17 rebounds, and 12 assists.

That was a triple-double, but the raw achievement does not fully explain why the performance mattered.

His 17 rebounds were the highest total by any player in the matchup. His 12 assists were also the most in the game.

Jokic therefore led Denver in two major categories while still scoring 15 points.

The five turnovers are worth acknowledging because a complete analysis should include weaknesses as well as strengths. High-usage playmakers can accumulate turnovers because they handle the ball frequently and attempt difficult passes. In this game, Jokic’s passing and rebounding production remained major positives despite the turnovers.

His performance also helped Denver finish with 30 team assists and 53 total rebounds.

Cameron Johnson’s Balanced Contribution

Cameron Johnson produced 19 points, nine rebounds, six assists, and two steals in 35 minutes.

This was one of Denver’s most complete supporting performances.

Johnson came close to a double-double in rebounds while also functioning as a secondary playmaker. Six assists from a player who also scored 19 points helped reduce pressure on Murray and Jokic.

The two steals added defensive value.

His contribution is a good example of why player statistics should be examined as a complete profile rather than simply ranked by points.

Christian Braun Adds Efficient Support

Christian Braun recorded 18 points, six rebounds, and four assists in 31 minutes.

His production gave Denver another double-digit scorer and helped maintain offensive balance.

When a team scores 130 points, it is difficult for one player to account for everything. Denver had multiple players capable of producing points and contributing in other areas.

Braun’s four assists and six rebounds reinforced that balance.

Denver’s Bench Production

Denver’s reserves also made meaningful contributions.

Jonas Valanciunas scored 13 points and grabbed six rebounds in only 13 minutes. His seven-of-eight free-throw shooting was particularly efficient.

Bruce Brown added 11 points, three rebounds, and four steals in 27 minutes.

Tim Hardaway Jr. scored three points in 10 minutes.

The bench numbers show that Denver did not rely exclusively on its starting lineup. Valanciunas supplied efficient scoring in limited minutes, while Brown’s four steals gave the second unit defensive impact.

Brice Sensabaugh Leads Utah’s Offense

Sensabaugh finished with 28 points, six rebounds, and four assists.

His six-of-nine three-point shooting stands out immediately.

Utah attempted 37 three-pointers as a team and made 12. Sensabaugh alone accounted for half of those made three-pointers.

That is a significant offensive contribution.

His 28 points also represented the highest scoring total for Utah. Without his perimeter production, the Jazz would have faced an even greater offensive challenge.

Kyle Filipowski Provides Inside and Outside Production

Filipowski finished with 25 points, 12 rebounds, and three assists.

His 12 rebounds tied Jokic’s overall rebounding influence on the Utah side, although Jokic ultimately led all players with 17.

Filipowski also made three of eight three-point attempts. His ability to combine interior rebounding with perimeter shooting gave Utah a versatile offensive option.

The 25-point, 12-rebound combination was one of the strongest individual performances for the Jazz.

Cody Williams and Utah’s Playmaking

Cody Williams scored nine points but led Utah with nine assists.

This is a useful example of why a low scoring total does not necessarily indicate a low-impact game.

Williams played 38 minutes, the highest total among the listed Utah players, and his nine assists contributed to Utah’s 32 team assists.

Utah actually finished with more assists than Denver, 32 to 30.

That statistic suggests that Denver’s advantage came less from having superior raw team playmaking and more from converting its opportunities more efficiently.

John Konchar’s All-Around Bench Game

Konchar produced 12 points, 10 rebounds, six assists, and two steals.

His double-double combined with six assists made him one of Utah’s most versatile contributors.

The 10 rebounds were especially valuable because Utah finished with 44 total rebounds compared with Denver’s 53.

Konchar’s performance helped Utah remain competitive on the glass despite Denver’s overall rebounding advantage.

Team Shooting Comparison

The shooting numbers are among the clearest indicators of the final result.

Category	Denver	Utah
Field Goals	44-91	44-95
Field-Goal Percentage	48%	46%
Three-Pointers	16-39	12-37
Three-Point Percentage	41%	32%
Free Throws	26-31	17-25
Free-Throw Percentage	84%	68%

Denver made the same number of field goals as Utah despite taking four fewer attempts.

The three-point difference was even more important. Denver made four more three-pointers while shooting at a substantially higher percentage.

Denver also made nine more free throws.

When combined, these advantages explain much of the 13-point final margin.

Rebounding Comparison

Denver collected 53 rebounds compared with Utah’s 44.

The Nuggets had 12 offensive rebounds and 41 defensive rebounds.

Utah also recorded 12 offensive rebounds but had only 32 defensive rebounds.

The equal offensive-rebound totals mean Denver’s advantage came primarily on the defensive glass.

Denver’s 41 defensive rebounds helped limit Utah’s second-chance opportunities after missed shots.

Jokic’s 17 rebounds were a major part of that advantage.

Filipowski led Utah with 12 rebounds, while Konchar added 10.

Assists and Ball Movement

Utah finished with 32 assists, two more than Denver’s 30.

This is one of the more interesting statistics in the game because the team with more assists did not win.

The explanation is efficiency.

Assists can indicate effective ball movement, but they do not guarantee successful shooting. Denver converted 48 percent of its field goals and 41 percent of its threes.

Utah’s 46 percent overall field-goal rate and 32 percent three-point rate were respectable but not enough to match Denver’s offensive output.

Jokic’s 12 assists were especially important to Denver’s offensive structure.

Turnovers and Defensive Events

Denver committed 13 turnovers while Utah committed 12.

Utah therefore had a slight advantage in ball security.

However, Denver recorded nine steals compared with Utah’s seven. Both teams finished with four blocks.

The numbers show that Denver’s win was not simply created by forcing turnovers.

Instead, the bigger advantages came from shooting, rebounding, free throws, and the ability to maintain scoring pressure across the first and fourth quarters.

The Four-Game Season Series

Denver completed a 4-0 season sweep over Utah.

The four reported results were:

1. December 23: Denver 135, Utah 112
2. March 3: Denver 128, Utah 125
3. March 28: Denver 135, Utah 129
4. April 2: Denver 130, Utah 117

The results show different types of victories.

The December meeting was a 23-point Denver win.

The March 3 game was much tighter, ending in a three-point Denver victory.

The March 28 matchup was another high-scoring contest decided by six points.

The April 2 meeting ended with a 13-point Denver advantage.

Across all four games, Denver consistently produced enough offense to defeat Utah.

What the Season Series Reveals

A four-game sweep does not necessarily mean every matchup followed the same pattern.

The March 3 result was particularly close, while the December 23 game featured a much larger margin.

The repeated high scores also stand out.

Denver scored at least 128 points in each of the four listed meetings. Utah reached 125 points or more in two of them.

That suggests these matchups generally produced fast and productive offensive games rather than defensive struggles.

The April 2 game continued that pattern with 247 combined points.

Why the 130-117 Score Matters

A 13-point margin can sometimes hide how competitive a game was.

Utah won the third quarter by seven points. That means the Jazz were capable of changing the game’s momentum.

However, Denver’s 39-point first quarter and 33-point fourth quarter outweighed Utah’s third-quarter advantage.

This is one of the clearest lessons from the box score.

A team does not need to dominate every quarter to win comfortably. Strong starts and strong finishes can compensate for a weaker middle stretch.

Comparing the Leading Players

Murray and Sensabaugh were the leading scorers for their respective teams.

Murray scored 37 points.

Sensabaugh scored 28.

That nine-point difference was significant, particularly because Denver also received 19 points from Johnson and 18 from Braun.

Utah had strong production from Filipowski with 25 points, but Denver had more high-level scoring support around its primary scorer.

Jokic’s role was also fundamentally different. His 15 points were fewer than Sensabaugh’s 28, but his 17 rebounds and 12 assists dramatically increased his overall statistical influence.

What the Box Score Says About Denver

Denver’s statistical profile points to a team that won through efficiency and balance.

The key strengths were:

• 48 percent field-goal shooting
• 41 percent three-point shooting
• 84 percent free-throw shooting
• 53 rebounds
• 30 assists
• 130 total points
• 37 points from Murray
• 17 rebounds and 12 assists from Jokic

The Nuggets also received contributions from several players rather than depending entirely on one scorer.

That balance made it difficult for Utah to close the gap after the opening quarter.

What the Box Score Says About Utah

Utah’s performance had several positive elements despite the loss.

The Jazz produced 32 assists, which was higher than Denver’s 30.

They also made 44 field goals, the same number as Denver.

Sensabaugh’s six three-pointers were a major positive, while Filipowski produced a 25-point, 12-rebound performance.

Konchar contributed 10 rebounds and six assists from the bench.

The main issue was efficiency.

Utah’s 32 percent three-point shooting and 68 percent free-throw shooting left too many scoring opportunities unused.

Important Statistical Takeaways

Several numbers stand above the rest when evaluating this matchup.

1. Denver’s three-point advantage

Denver made 16 threes.

Utah made 12.

Those four additional made threes created a substantial scoring difference.

2. Denver’s free-throw advantage

Denver made 26 free throws.

Utah made 17.

That nine-point difference directly contributed to the final margin.

3. Denver’s rebounding advantage

Denver grabbed 53 rebounds compared with Utah’s 44.

The nine-rebound advantage helped Denver control missed-shot possessions.

4. Murray’s scoring

Murray’s 37 points were the highest individual scoring total.

5. Jokic’s all-around production

Jokic recorded 15 points, 17 rebounds, and 12 assists.

6. Utah’s perimeter shooting from Sensabaugh

Sensabaugh made six of nine three-point attempts and scored 28 points.

How to Read Player Stats Beyond Points

One of the most useful lessons from this game is that points alone are not enough to evaluate player performance.

Consider Jokic.

His 15 points were lower than Murray’s 37, but his 17 rebounds and 12 assists made his total contribution much larger than the scoring column suggests.

The same principle applies to Williams.

Williams scored nine points, but his nine assists made him one of Utah’s most important offensive facilitators.

Konchar is another example. His 12 points were solid, but his 10 rebounds and six assists gave him a much broader impact.

A complete box-score analysis therefore considers scoring, rebounding, assists, turnovers, shooting efficiency, minutes, and defensive statistics together.

Final Assessment

The April 2, 2026 meeting between Denver and Utah was a strong example of how offensive efficiency can determine a high-scoring NBA game.

Denver scored 130 points while shooting 48 percent from the field, 41 percent from three-point range, and 84 percent from the free-throw line.

Utah scored 117 points while shooting 46 percent overall, 32 percent from three, and 68 percent from the line.

The Nuggets also won the rebounding battle 53-44.

Murray’s 37 points supplied the scoring headline, while Jokic’s 17 rebounds and 12 assists demonstrated his broad influence. Johnson and Braun added important secondary scoring, while Valanciunas and Brown provided useful bench production.

Utah had strong performances from Sensabaugh, Filipowski, Williams, and Konchar. Sensabaugh’s 28 points and six three-pointers were particularly impressive, while Filipowski’s 25 points and 12 rebounds gave Utah a dependable inside-outside option.

The game also completed Denver’s 4-0 season sweep of Utah.

Overall, the box score suggests that Denver won because it converted its possessions more effectively. Utah had slightly more assists and nearly the same number of made field goals, but Denver’s superior three-point shooting, free-throw efficiency, rebounding, and fourth-quarter response created the decisive separation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points in the game?

Jamal Murray led all players with 37 points for Denver. Brice Sensabaugh was Utah’s leading scorer with 28 points.

What were Nikola Jokic’s stats against Utah?

Nikola Jokic recorded 15 points, 17 rebounds, and 12 assists in the matchup. He also had five turnovers.

Who led Utah in rebounds?

Kyle Filipowski led Utah with 12 rebounds. John Konchar also recorded a double-double with 12 points and 10 rebounds.

How many three-pointers did Denver make?

Denver made 16 of 39 three-point attempts, shooting 41 percent from beyond the arc.

How many times did Denver beat Utah during the season?

According to the supplied game data, Denver won all four meetings against Utah during the season.

What was the final score?

Denver defeated Utah 130-117 at Delta Center in Salt Lake City on April 2, 2026.

Conclusion

The denver nuggets vs utah jazz match player stats provide a detailed picture of a game that was decided by efficiency rather than one statistic alone. Denver’s 130 points came from strong three-point shooting, excellent free-throw conversion, superior rebounding, and balanced individual production.

Jamal Murray’s 37 points were the most visible part of the performance, but Nikola Jokic’s 17 rebounds and 12 assists were equally important to Denver’s control of the game. Cameron Johnson and Christian Braun added valuable scoring and playmaking, while the bench supplied additional production.

Utah had several impressive individual performances. Brice Sensabaugh’s 28 points and six made threes gave the Jazz a dangerous perimeter scorer. Kyle Filipowski produced 25 points and 12 rebounds, Cody Williams supplied nine assists, and John Konchar delivered an all-around contribution from the bench.

The quarter-by-quarter numbers also explain the final margin. Denver built an early advantage with 39 points in the opening period, absorbed Utah’s 36-point third-quarter response, and then closed the game with 33 fourth-quarter points.

For anyone studying the denver nuggets vs utah jazz match player stats, the most useful conclusion is that the final score was supported by several connected statistical advantages. Denver shot better, rebounded better, converted free throws more efficiently, and had enough scoring depth around its leading performers to withstand Utah’s third-quarter surge.