Dallas Mavericks vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats
The dallas mavericks vs utah jazz match player stats from January 9, 2026, tell the story of an extremely close NBA game decided by just two points. The Utah Jazz defeated the Dallas Mavericks 116-114 at Delta Center in Salt Lake City, turning a competitive fourth quarter into a narrow home victory. Lauri Markkanen led all scorers with 33 points, while Cooper Flagg produced one of Dallas’ most complete individual performances with 26 points, 10 rebounds, and 8 assists. Klay Thompson added 23 points for Dallas, while Keyonte George contributed 19 points and 7 assists for Utah.
This game is worth studying beyond the final score. Dallas actually shot better from the field and from three-point range, finishing at 52% overall and 42% from deep. Utah, however, created a major advantage through ball security and defensive activity. The Jazz committed only 9 turnovers compared with Dallas’ 20 and recorded 11 steals compared with Dallas’ 4. That difference helped Utah overcome Dallas’ shooting efficiency and eventually secure the 116-114 victory.
The matchup also provides a useful example of why a box score should never be reduced to the highest scoring player. Individual scoring, rebounding, assists, shooting efficiency, turnovers, steals, and team possessions all contributed to the result. Looking at those categories together gives a much clearer explanation of how Utah won and why Dallas remained within striking distance until the final minutes.
Dallas Mavericks vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The game took place on January 9, 2026, at Delta Center in Salt Lake City, Utah. The attendance was listed at 18,186, and the game began at 7:00 AM according to the supplied game data.
Utah entered the matchup with a 13-24 overall record and a 9-11 home record. Dallas came into the contest at 14-24 overall and 4-14 on the road.
The final result was:
Utah Jazz 116, Dallas Mavericks 114
The margin was only two points, which makes the individual and team statistical differences especially important.
Game Score by Quarter
| Quarter | Dallas Mavericks | Utah Jazz |
| 1st | 29 | 34 |
| 2nd | 26 | 24 |
| 3rd | 34 | 30 |
| 4th | 25 | 28 |
| Final | 114 | 116 |
Utah established an early advantage by scoring 34 points in the first quarter. Dallas responded in the second and third quarters, including a strong 34-point third period, but Utah still held enough offensive momentum to close the game with a 28-point fourth quarter.
The quarter-by-quarter numbers show that this was not a game dominated by one team from start to finish. Dallas had multiple opportunities to take control, but Utah consistently answered.
Dallas Mavericks Player Performance
Dallas received significant production from Cooper Flagg and Klay Thompson, while Anthony Davis controlled the glass.
Cooper Flagg
Cooper Flagg was one of the most influential Dallas players in the game. He scored 26 points and contributed 10 rebounds and 8 assists.
That statistical line is particularly important because it shows that his impact extended beyond scoring.
A player who produces 26 points while also reaching double figures in rebounds and coming close to a triple-double can influence several parts of an offense. His 8 assists indicate that Dallas was also relying on him as a creator.
The combination of 26 points, 10 rebounds, and 8 assists makes Flagg’s performance one of the clearest highlights of the game.
From an analytical perspective, the most interesting part of his performance is the balance between scoring and playmaking. Dallas did not simply use him as a finishing option. His assist total indicates that he was involved in creating opportunities for teammates as well.
Klay Thompson
Klay Thompson finished with 23 points, making him Dallas’ second-leading scorer.
His scoring was important because Dallas needed multiple offensive options to remain competitive against Markkanen’s 33-point performance.
Dallas ultimately scored 114 points, so Thompson’s contribution formed a meaningful portion of the team’s offensive output. When a game is decided by two points, secondary scoring becomes especially valuable because a few additional made shots can change the result.
Anthony Davis
Anthony Davis was Dallas’ leading rebounder with 11 rebounds.
Rebounding was one of the areas where Dallas performed well as a team. The Mavericks collected 47 total rebounds compared with Utah’s 42.
Davis’ 11 rebounds therefore helped Dallas maintain a five-rebound team advantage.
That advantage did not translate into a win, but it mattered. Dallas was able to compete on the glass even while Utah created a much larger advantage in turnovers and steals.
Dallas Starting Lineup
The supplied starting lineup for Dallas was:
- Anthony Davis
- Daniel Gafford
- Naji Marshall
- Cooper Flagg
- Max Christie
This group combined interior size, defensive versatility, perimeter ability, and playmaking.
Flagg’s offensive production and Davis’ rebounding were particularly important statistical contributions from the starting group.
Utah Jazz Player Performance
Utah’s individual statistics were led by Lauri Markkanen, with Keyonte George providing valuable scoring and playmaking support.
Lauri Markkanen
Lauri Markkanen was the game’s leading scorer with 33 points.
He shot 14-of-26 from the field, making his scoring output especially significant. His shooting volume and efficiency allowed Utah to maintain offensive pressure throughout the game.
Markkanen’s 33 points were 7 more than Dallas’ leading scorer, Cooper Flagg.
That difference does not mean Utah simply won because Markkanen outscored Flagg. Basketball is too dependent on multiple players and possessions for that conclusion. However, having a 33-point primary scorer gave Utah an important offensive foundation.
Markkanen’s performance was one of the clearest reasons Utah was able to reach 116 points.
Keyonte George
Keyonte George finished with 19 points and 7 assists.
His 7 assists were particularly valuable because Utah finished with 32 team assists compared with Dallas’ 30.
George therefore contributed not only as a scorer but also as a facilitator.
When a team has a high-scoring forward such as Markkanen, having another player capable of creating opportunities can make the offense more difficult to defend. George’s combination of scoring and passing helped Utah distribute its offensive responsibility.
Kevin Love
Kevin Love led Utah in rebounding with 10 boards.
His double-digit rebounding performance helped Utah remain competitive despite Dallas finishing with 47 total rebounds.
Utah’s team rebounding total was 42, which means Dallas had the advantage on the glass. Nevertheless, Love’s 10 rebounds represented a substantial individual contribution.
Utah Starting Lineup
The supplied Utah starting lineup was:
- Kevin Love
- Lauri Markkanen
- Cody Williams
- Brice Sensabaugh
- Keyonte George
The lineup provided Utah with scoring, rebounding, and playmaking options.
Markkanen supplied the highest scoring output, George contributed both scoring and assists, and Love provided interior rebounding.
Comparing the Main Scorers
One of the simplest ways to understand the offensive battle is to compare the leading individual scorers.
| Player | Team | Points |
| Lauri Markkanen | Utah Jazz | 33 |
| Cooper Flagg | Dallas Mavericks | 26 |
| Klay Thompson | Dallas Mavericks | 23 |
| Keyonte George | Utah Jazz | 19 |
Markkanen’s 33 points were the highest individual total in the game.
Dallas, however, received a combined 49 points from Flagg and Thompson. That helped offset Markkanen’s scoring advantage and explains why the game remained close.
The difference between the teams was therefore not simply about which team had the best scorer. It was about what happened across all possessions.
Shooting Efficiency and Why It Matters
The team shooting numbers provide one of the most interesting aspects of the game.
Dallas Shooting
Dallas finished with:
- 44-of-85 field goals
- 15-of-36 three-pointers
- 11-of-13 free throws
- 52% field-goal shooting
- 42% three-point shooting
- 85% free-throw shooting
These are strong shooting numbers.
Dallas made more than half of its field-goal attempts and converted 42% of its three-point attempts. The team also shot 85% from the free-throw line.
Ordinarily, that level of shooting efficiency would give a team an excellent opportunity to win.
Yet Dallas still lost.
That is one of the most useful lessons from this box score.
Utah Shooting
Utah finished with:
- 47-of-95 field goals
- 13-of-41 three-pointers
- 9-of-14 free throws
- 49% field-goal shooting
- 32% three-point shooting
- 64% free-throw shooting
Utah did not shoot as efficiently as Dallas.
The Jazz made 49% of their field-goal attempts compared with Dallas’ 52%. Their three-point percentage was also substantially lower, at 32% compared with Dallas’ 42%.
This makes Utah’s victory more interesting.
The Jazz did not win because they were more accurate from the field. They won while being less efficient in several shooting categories.
The Turnover Battle Changed the Game
The biggest statistical difference in the matchup may have been turnovers.
Dallas committed 20 turnovers.
Utah committed only 9 turnovers.
That is an 11-turnover difference.
For a game decided by two points, that is enormous.
Turnovers can create several problems at once. A turnover ends an offensive possession without a shot attempt, gives the opponent a chance to score, and can produce transition opportunities.
Dallas’ 20 turnovers therefore represented lost offensive opportunities.
Utah’s 9 turnovers showed much stronger ball security.
This is one of the strongest explanations for how Utah could win despite Dallas having superior shooting percentages.
Steals Add More Context
The defensive activity numbers reinforce the turnover story.
Utah recorded:
11 steals
Dallas recorded:
4 steals
The Jazz therefore produced 7 more steals than the Mavericks.
This suggests that Utah was not merely benefiting from accidental Dallas mistakes. The team was also creating defensive pressure that contributed to its turnover advantage.
When the two statistics are viewed together, Utah’s defensive impact becomes clearer.
Team Statistical Comparison
| Category | Dallas Mavericks | Utah Jazz |
| Points | 114 | 116 |
| Field Goals | 44-85 | 47-95 |
| Field-Goal % | 52% | 49% |
| Three-Pointers | 15-36 | 13-41 |
| Three-Point % | 42% | 32% |
| Free Throws | 11-13 | 9-14 |
| Free-Throw % | 85% | 64% |
| Rebounds | 47 | 42 |
| Assists | 30 | 32 |
| Turnovers | 20 | 9 |
| Steals | 4 | 11 |
| Blocks | 2 | 3 |
The table makes the central story easy to see.
Dallas had the advantage in shooting efficiency and rebounding.
Utah had the advantage in assists, turnovers, steals, and blocks.
The final score shows that the second group of categories was enough to overcome Dallas’ shooting advantage.
Why Dallas Lost Despite Shooting 52%
At first glance, a 52% field-goal percentage and 42% three-point percentage look like the numbers of a winning team.
But shooting percentage alone does not measure every possession.
Dallas made 44 field goals and 15 three-pointers, but the team also committed 20 turnovers.
That creates a fundamental efficiency problem.
If a team shoots efficiently but repeatedly gives possessions away, it can lose the benefit created by its accurate shooting.
This is particularly important in close games.
Dallas had enough shooting efficiency to score 114 points, but Utah reached 116 while committing less than half as many turnovers.
The lesson is simple: efficient shooting cannot fully compensate for poor possession management.
Why Utah Won the Game
Utah’s victory can be explained through several connected factors.
1. Markkanen’s 33 Points
Markkanen provided the game’s biggest individual scoring performance.
His 14-of-26 shooting gave Utah a reliable offensive option.
2. Superior Ball Security
Utah committed only 9 turnovers.
Dallas committed 20.
That 11-possession difference was critical.
3. Defensive Playmaking
Utah recorded 11 steals.
Dallas recorded only 4.
The seven-steal advantage suggests that Utah was more successful at creating defensive disruptions.
4. Balanced Playmaking
Utah finished with 32 assists.
Dallas had 30.
The difference was not huge, but it shows that Utah generated slightly more assisted offense while also protecting the ball better.
5. Fourth-Quarter Execution
Utah scored 28 points in the fourth quarter.
Dallas scored 25.
With the final margin at two points, that three-point fourth-quarter advantage was decisive.
Fourth Quarter: The Deciding Stretch
The final quarter deserves special attention because the game was ultimately determined there.
Dallas entered the fourth quarter after scoring 34 points in the third.
That type of offensive output gave the Mavericks momentum.
Utah responded by scoring 28 points in the final period.
Dallas managed 25.
The difference was only three points, but the final margin was two.
This is a good example of why late-game performance should be evaluated in context. A three-point difference over a full quarter may seem small, but in a 116-114 game it can be the difference between winning and losing.
Rebounding Comparison
Dallas won the rebounding battle 47-42.
That gives the Mavericks a five-rebound advantage.
Anthony Davis led Dallas individually with 11 rebounds, while Kevin Love led Utah with 10.
The rebounding numbers suggest that Dallas did several things well physically.
However, rebounds do not exist in isolation.
Utah’s advantage in turnovers and steals outweighed Dallas’ advantage on the glass.
This illustrates an important principle when analyzing basketball statistics: winning one statistical category does not automatically mean winning the game.
A team can dominate rebounding and still lose if it gives away too many possessions.
Assists and Offensive Organization
Dallas recorded 30 assists.
Utah recorded 32.
The difference was only two assists, but it provides useful context.
Dallas’ offense was not stagnant. Thirty assists on 44 made field goals indicate that a significant portion of the team’s scoring came through assisted plays.
Utah’s 32 assists on 47 made field goals also indicate strong ball movement.
The more important distinction is what happened alongside those assists.
Utah paired its 32 assists with only 9 turnovers.
Dallas paired 30 assists with 20 turnovers.
That is a major difference in offensive security.
The numbers suggest Utah was able to generate comparable playmaking while protecting possessions much more effectively.
The Importance of Three-Point Shooting
Dallas had a major advantage from three-point range.
The Mavericks shot 15-of-36, or 42%.
Utah shot 13-of-41, or 32%.
Dallas therefore made two more three-pointers and did so with significantly better accuracy.
This should have created an advantage for Dallas.
However, the Jazz still won.
The result demonstrates that three-point efficiency is only one part of the scoring equation.
Utah compensated through overall shot volume, ball security, defensive pressure, and scoring from Markkanen.
Dallas’ three-point shooting kept the game close, but it was not enough to overcome the possession difference.
Free-Throw Efficiency
Dallas also had the better free-throw percentage.
The Mavericks made 11 of 13 attempts, or 85%.
Utah made 9 of 14, or 64%.
Again, Dallas had the efficiency advantage.
This reinforces the broader conclusion that Utah’s win was not built on superior shooting accuracy.
The Jazz won through a combination of scoring volume, possession control, defensive disruption, and late-game execution.
A Deeper Look at the Possession Battle
The most revealing way to study this game is to think about possessions rather than only percentages.
Dallas converted its opportunities at a high rate.
Utah created more defensive disruptions and protected its own possessions better.
Dallas’ 20 turnovers meant that many offensive possessions ended without a field-goal attempt or free-throw opportunity.
Utah’s 9 turnovers allowed the Jazz to preserve more of their possessions.
Meanwhile, Utah recorded 11 steals.
That creates the possibility of both denying Dallas a normal offensive possession and creating an opportunity for Utah.
This is why the turnover and steal statistics deserve so much attention when reviewing the game.
What the Game Says About Cooper Flagg
Flagg’s 26-point, 10-rebound, 8-assist performance deserves to be viewed as a multidimensional contribution.
The scoring total made him Dallas’ leading scorer.
The 10 rebounds made him an important contributor on the glass.
The 8 assists showed that he was also creating opportunities for teammates.
A performance like this is difficult to describe using only points.
For analytical purposes, the most meaningful aspect may be the combination of scoring and playmaking. Dallas had a primary contributor capable of influencing several areas of the game.
The problem was that the overall team possession profile did not match the quality of some of the individual performances.
What the Game Says About Lauri Markkanen
Markkanen’s 33 points were the game’s highest individual scoring total.
His 14-of-26 shooting is also important because it shows that his scoring was supported by a substantial number of successful field goals rather than simply a small number of free throws.
He provided Utah with a consistent scoring source while the team’s defensive activity created additional opportunities.
That combination is a powerful formula.
A high-level scorer can put pressure on a defense in the half court, while steals and turnovers can generate easier scoring opportunities in transition.
Utah benefited from both.
Dallas’ Strongest Statistical Advantages
Dallas had several clear strengths.
Field-Goal Efficiency
Dallas shot 52% from the field.
Three-Point Efficiency
Dallas shot 42% from three-point range.
Free-Throw Efficiency
Dallas converted 85% of its free throws.
Rebounding
Dallas collected 47 rebounds compared with Utah’s 42.
These are meaningful advantages.
If the Mavericks had protected the ball more effectively, the outcome could have looked very different.
Utah’s Strongest Statistical Advantages
Utah’s biggest advantages were concentrated in possession management and defense.
Turnovers
Utah committed 9 compared with Dallas’ 20.
Steals
Utah recorded 11 compared with Dallas’ 4.
Assists
Utah recorded 32 compared with Dallas’ 30.
Blocks
Utah recorded 3 compared with Dallas’ 2.
These categories help explain why Utah could win despite being less efficient in shooting.
Season Series Implications
The supplied data states that Utah led the season series 2-0 after this matchup.
That gives the game additional significance when looking at the broader matchup between the two teams.
A 2-0 season-series advantage means Utah had successfully handled Dallas in both meetings represented by the supplied season data.
For Dallas, that makes the statistical lessons from this game more useful. Shooting efficiency was not enough to solve the Jazz.
For Utah, the two victories suggest that the team was able to create problems for Dallas beyond traditional shooting percentages.
What Fans Should Take Away From the Box Score
Fans looking at only the final score might remember Utah’s two-point victory.
Fans looking deeper into the statistics should notice something more interesting.
Dallas was the more efficient shooting team.
Utah was the better possession-management team.
Dallas won the rebounding battle.
Utah won the turnover battle by a huge margin.
Dallas had strong three-point shooting.
Utah generated significantly more steals.
These competing advantages produced an extremely close result.
That is why a detailed box-score analysis is more useful than simply repeating the final score.
What Analysts Should Watch in Similar Games
Several statistical indicators from this matchup are useful when evaluating future Dallas and Utah games.
Turnover Margin
This should be one of the first numbers to check.
If Dallas again produces high shooting percentages but gives away a large number of possessions, shooting efficiency may not be enough.
Three-Point Volume and Accuracy
Dallas’ 15-of-36 performance from deep was a major strength.
Maintaining that type of efficiency can give Dallas an offensive advantage, provided turnovers remain controlled.
Primary Scoring
Markkanen’s scoring production demonstrates the value of having a dependable high-volume scorer.
For Dallas, Flagg and Thompson provided strong scoring support, but the team still needed better possession control.
Defensive Activity
Utah’s 11 steals were one of the clearest differences in the game.
Future matchups should be evaluated partly by whether Dallas can reduce live-ball turnovers and whether Utah can continue creating defensive pressure.
Dallas Mavericks vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
The most important conclusions from the dallas mavericks vs utah jazz match player stats can be summarized in several points.
- Utah won 116-114.
- Lauri Markkanen led all scorers with 33 points.
- Cooper Flagg recorded 26 points, 10 rebounds, and 8 assists.
- Klay Thompson scored 23 points for Dallas.
- Keyonte George produced 19 points and 7 assists.
- Anthony Davis led Dallas with 11 rebounds.
- Kevin Love led Utah with 10 rebounds.
- Dallas shot 52% from the field.
- Dallas shot 42% from three-point range.
- Utah shot 49% from the field.
- Utah shot 32% from three-point range.
- Dallas committed 20 turnovers.
- Utah committed only 9 turnovers.
- Utah recorded 11 steals.
- Dallas recorded 4 steals.
- Dallas won the rebounding battle 47-42.
- Utah won the game despite shooting less efficiently.
- Utah’s three-point shooting was weaker than Dallas’ but did not prevent the Jazz from scoring 116 points.
- The fourth-quarter scoring advantage went to Utah, 28-25.
- The supplied season-series data gives Utah a 2-0 advantage.
The most important analytical point is that shooting percentages did not tell the entire story.
Dallas was more efficient when it actually took its shots. Utah was more effective at protecting possessions and disrupting Dallas’ possessions.
That distinction explains much of the final result.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Dallas Mavericks vs Utah Jazz game on January 9, 2026?
The Utah Jazz defeated the Dallas Mavericks 116-114 at Delta Center in Salt Lake City.
Who was the leading scorer in the game?
Lauri Markkanen was the leading scorer with 33 points for Utah. He shot 14-of-26 from the field.
How did Cooper Flagg perform against the Jazz?
Cooper Flagg recorded 26 points, 10 rebounds, and 8 assists for Dallas.
Which team had more turnovers?
Dallas had more turnovers. The Mavericks committed 20 turnovers, while Utah committed 9.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
Dallas shot better from three-point range. The Mavericks made 15 of 36 attempts for 42%, while Utah made 13 of 41 attempts for 32%.
Who led the game in rebounds?
Anthony Davis led Dallas with 11 rebounds, while Kevin Love led Utah with 10 rebounds.
Conclusion
The dallas mavericks vs utah jazz match player stats reveal a game in which traditional shooting efficiency did not determine the winner. Dallas shot 52% from the field, 42% from three-point range, and 85% from the free-throw line. The Mavericks also won the rebounding battle 47-42.
Yet Utah finished on top because it controlled other important parts of the game.
The Jazz committed only 9 turnovers compared with Dallas’ 20 and recorded 11 steals compared with Dallas’ 4. Lauri Markkanen supplied a game-high 33 points, while Keyonte George added 19 points and 7 assists. On the Dallas side, Cooper Flagg delivered 26 points, 10 rebounds, and 8 assists, with Klay Thompson contributing 23 points and Anthony Davis collecting 11 rebounds.
The final score of 116-114 reflects how close the contest was, but the underlying numbers explain why Utah prevailed. Dallas demonstrated superior shooting efficiency, while Utah demonstrated stronger possession control and defensive disruption.
For anyone studying this box score, the central lesson is clear: basketball games are decided by the total quality of possessions, not by one statistic. Shooting percentage, three-point accuracy, rebounding, assists, turnovers, steals, and late-game execution all interact. In this matchup, Utah’s ability to protect the ball and create turnovers was enough to overcome Dallas’ superior shooting efficiency and secure a two-point victory.
