76ers vs Chicago Bulls Match Player Stats
The 76ers vs chicago bulls match player stats tell the story of a competitive NBA contest where the Chicago Bulls secured a 109 to 102 victory over the Philadelphia 76ers on December 27, 2025, at the United Center in Chicago. While the final score suggests a comfortable win, the game itself featured multiple momentum swings, standout individual performances, and several tactical adjustments that influenced the outcome.
For fans, analysts, and fantasy basketball enthusiasts, this matchup offered far more than just a final score. The numbers reveal how Chicago’s balanced offensive attack, superior ball movement, and rebounding advantage ultimately outweighed Philadelphia’s reliance on Joel Embiid’s dominant scoring display. Looking beyond the box score also helps explain why the Bulls improved to 15 to 15 while the 76ers dropped to 16 to 13.
This detailed analysis examines every important statistic, player contribution, team trend, and game-changing sequence using verified game data while providing context that simple box scores often fail to capture.
Match Overview
| Game Details | Information |
| Date | December 27, 2025 |
| Venue | United Center |
| City | Chicago, Illinois |
| Attendance | 20,952 |
| Final Score | Chicago Bulls 109, Philadelphia 76ers 102 |
| Winning Team | Chicago Bulls |
| Philadelphia Record | 16 to 13 |
| Chicago Record | 15 to 15 |
Chicago entered the game looking to continue its success against Philadelphia after winning the first meeting earlier in the season. The victory also gave the Bulls a 2 to 0 lead in the season series, highlighting their ability to execute against one of the Eastern Conference’s strongest lineups.
Although Philadelphia had arguably the best individual player on the floor in Joel Embiid, basketball remains a team game. Chicago demonstrated that principle throughout the evening by sharing the ball effectively, controlling rebounds, and receiving valuable production from multiple players.
Quarter by Quarter Analysis
First Quarter
The Bulls opened aggressively and finished the opening period ahead 30 to 28.
Philadelphia showed confidence offensively, but Chicago’s efficient shooting prevented the visitors from gaining any early momentum. The Bulls consistently attacked inside while creating open perimeter looks through crisp passing.
At the end of the first quarter:
- Bulls: 30
- 76ers: 28
The narrow margin hinted that fans were in for an entertaining contest.
Second Quarter
The second quarter slightly shifted toward Philadelphia.
Although Chicago managed only 19 points during the period, the 76ers scored 24 to reduce the Bulls’ offensive advantage.
Joel Embiid established himself inside the paint, drawing fouls and finishing through contact. Philadelphia also tightened its defensive rotations, forcing Chicago into more difficult possessions.
Halftime score:
- Chicago Bulls: 49
- Philadelphia 76ers: 52
Philadelphia entered halftime with a three-point lead after recovering from the early deficit.
Third Quarter
The third quarter featured the highest offensive output from both teams.
Philadelphia scored 33 points while Chicago answered with 32, keeping the game extremely close.
Tyrese Maxey added pace in transition, while Paul George contributed on both ends of the floor. However, Chicago continued moving the basketball exceptionally well, ensuring that no prolonged scoring drought developed.
Entering the fourth quarter:
- Philadelphia: 85
- Chicago: 81
Despite trailing, the Bulls remained composed.
Fourth Quarter
The final period completely changed the game’s direction.
Chicago outscored Philadelphia 28 to 17 during the last twelve minutes.
Several factors contributed to this turnaround:
- Better shot selection
- Stronger rebounding
- Improved defensive pressure
- Excellent passing under pressure
- Multiple contributors instead of relying on one scorer
Philadelphia struggled offensively late in the contest, while Chicago capitalized on nearly every important possession.
The fourth quarter ultimately decided the game.
Team Statistical Comparison
The overall statistics reveal why Chicago emerged victorious.
| Team Statistics | Philadelphia 76ers | Chicago Bulls |
| Field Goals | 35 of 93 (38%) | 38 of 86 (44%) |
| Three Pointers | 11 of 39 (28%) | 14 of 41 (34%) |
| Free Throws | 21 of 24 (88%) | 19 of 25 (76%) |
| Total Rebounds | 46 | 52 |
| Assists | 22 | 31 |
| Turnovers | 8 | 11 |
| Steals | 7 | 3 |
| Blocks | 4 | 6 |
Several statistics stand out immediately.
Shooting Efficiency
Chicago shot 44 percent from the field compared with Philadelphia’s 38 percent.
That six percent difference translated into several additional made baskets and proved critical in such a close contest.
Three Point Shooting
Modern NBA games often hinge on perimeter shooting.
The Bulls converted 34 percent of their three-point attempts compared with only 28 percent for the 76ers.
Although the percentage gap appears modest, those additional made shots significantly affected the final margin.
Rebounding Battle
Chicago collected 52 rebounds while Philadelphia managed 46.
Winning the rebounding battle created valuable second-chance opportunities and limited Philadelphia’s offensive possessions.
Ball Movement
Perhaps the biggest difference appeared in assists.
Chicago finished with 31 assists.
Philadelphia recorded only 22.
This illustrates how effectively the Bulls created quality scoring opportunities through teamwork rather than isolation basketball.
Philadelphia 76ers Player Performance
Joel Embiid
Joel Embiid delivered another outstanding individual performance.
Points: 31
He consistently attacked inside, drew fouls, controlled the paint, and remained Philadelphia’s most reliable offensive weapon throughout the game.
Even so, basketball requires contributions across the roster. Chicago successfully limited Philadelphia’s supporting cast enough to overcome Embiid’s scoring.
Tyrese Maxey
Maxey provided valuable secondary scoring while pushing the pace in transition.
His speed created mismatches, particularly during the third quarter, but Chicago defended him more effectively during crunch time.
Paul George
Paul George contributed on both ends of the floor through veteran leadership, perimeter defense, and playmaking.
Although his overall impact extended beyond scoring, Philadelphia needed greater offensive efficiency from its experienced forward late in the contest.
Dominick Barlow
Barlow handled physical defensive assignments while helping inside the paint.
His effort on the boards was important, though Chicago ultimately won the rebounding battle.
VJ Edgecombe
The young guard continued gaining valuable NBA experience against an experienced Bulls roster.
His energy and defensive intensity stood out despite the loss.
Philadelphia Bench Contributions
Philadelphia’s second unit included:
- Jabari Walker
- Justin Edwards
- Andre Drummond
- Adem Bona
- Quentin Grimes
- Jared McCain
Several reserve players provided productive minutes, particularly defensively.
Andre Drummond added size around the basket, while Quentin Grimes contributed perimeter shooting whenever opportunities arose.
Philadelphia also listed Kyle Lowry and Eric Gordon as unavailable by coach’s decision.
Johni Broome did not appear in the contest.
Chicago Bulls Player Performance
Chicago’s victory was built on balance rather than depending on one superstar. Instead of having a single player dominate the scoring column, several Bulls made meaningful contributions throughout the game. This approach made it difficult for Philadelphia’s defense to focus on stopping one offensive threat.
The Bulls’ starting lineup featured:
- Isaac Okoro
- Matas Buzelis
- Nikola Vucevic
- Coby White
- Josh Giddey
Each starter played a specific role within Chicago’s offensive and defensive system, helping the team produce one of its most complete performances of the season.
Zach Collins
Points: 15
Zach Collins finished as one of Chicago’s leading scorers despite coming off the bench.
His performance highlighted the importance of bench production in today’s NBA. Collins brought energy, physicality, and timely scoring whenever Philadelphia attempted to build momentum.
His ability to score in the paint and compete on the glass provided Chicago with valuable second-unit production.
Tre Jones
Points: 15
Tre Jones matched Collins with 15 points and played one of his most efficient games of the season.
Beyond scoring, Jones helped organize Chicago’s offense during critical possessions. His decision making and ball control reduced unnecessary mistakes and allowed the Bulls to maintain offensive rhythm throughout the fourth quarter.
Nikola Vucevic
Although he was not Chicago’s leading scorer, Nikola Vucevic remained one of the team’s most influential players.
His contributions included:
- Interior defense
- Defensive rebounding
- Screen setting
- Passing from the high post
- Creating spacing for teammates
Vucevic’s veteran presence helped stabilize Chicago whenever Philadelphia attempted to speed up the game.
Josh Giddey
Josh Giddey’s impact extended far beyond traditional scoring statistics.
He consistently created open shots through intelligent passing while maintaining excellent court awareness. His ability to find cutters and shooters played a major role in Chicago finishing with 31 assists, one of the most telling numbers from the game.
Coby White
Coby White stretched Philadelphia’s defense with his perimeter shooting and aggressive drives.
Even when he wasn’t scoring, his movement without the basketball forced defenders to rotate, creating easier scoring opportunities for teammates.
Matas Buzelis
The young forward continued to show why Chicago values his long-term development.
His athleticism, defensive versatility, and willingness to compete against experienced opponents helped Chicago maintain energy throughout all four quarters.
Isaac Okoro
Okoro’s defensive effort deserves recognition.
He accepted difficult defensive assignments while also contributing offensively when opportunities appeared. Players who impact winning through defense often receive less attention than leading scorers, but performances like this demonstrate their importance.
Chicago Bench Production
One of the biggest reasons behind the Bulls’ victory was the effectiveness of their second unit.
The Bulls bench included:
- Zach Collins
- Jalen Smith
- Kevin Huerter
- Tre Jones
- Ayo Dosunmu
Several reserves delivered productive minutes without disrupting Chicago’s offensive flow.
Kevin Huerter helped stretch the floor with perimeter shooting.
Jalen Smith added size inside and competed well for rebounds.
Ayo Dosunmu brought defensive intensity and additional ball handling during important stretches.
Patrick Williams, Dalen Terry, Julian Phillips, and Jevon Carter did not play because of coach’s decisions.
Why Chicago Won the Game
Looking deeper than the final score, several statistical advantages explain Chicago’s success.
Better Shooting Efficiency
The Bulls converted 44 percent of their field-goal attempts compared with 38 percent by Philadelphia.
Over nearly ninety possessions, that difference created enough extra baskets to decide the contest.
Dominating the Glass
Rebounding often determines close NBA games.
Chicago finished with 52 rebounds, while Philadelphia collected 46.
Those additional rebounds:
- Limited second-chance opportunities for Philadelphia.
- Extended Chicago’s offensive possessions.
- Helped control the game’s tempo.
Outstanding Ball Movement
Perhaps the most impressive statistic from Chicago’s performance was 31 assists.
Rather than relying on isolation basketball, the Bulls consistently found the open player.
Good passing generally leads to higher-quality shots, and this game served as an excellent example.
Strong Fourth Quarter Execution
Championship-level teams frequently separate themselves during the closing minutes.
Chicago scored 28 fourth-quarter points, while Philadelphia managed only 17.
The Bulls executed better in half-court offense, defended with greater discipline, and avoided rushed possessions when the pressure increased.
Why Philadelphia Lost Despite Joel Embiid’s 31 Points
One outstanding individual performance rarely guarantees victory in the NBA.
Joel Embiid’s 31-point effort demonstrated why he remains one of the league’s premier players, but several factors prevented Philadelphia from securing the win.
Limited Offensive Support
Outside of Embiid, Philadelphia struggled to generate consistent scoring during crucial stretches.
Chicago focused defensive attention on limiting secondary contributors, forcing the 76ers into more difficult offensive possessions.
Poor Shooting Percentage
Philadelphia made only 35 of 93 field-goal attempts.
A shooting percentage of 38 percent is rarely enough to defeat a well-balanced opponent.
Fourth Quarter Offensive Struggles
Scoring only 17 points during the final quarter proved costly.
Missed perimeter shots and fewer successful possessions allowed Chicago to erase the deficit and finish strongly.
Key Moments That Changed the Match
Several sequences had a major influence on the outcome.
Chicago’s Balanced Scoring
Rather than relying on one player, multiple Bulls contributed throughout the evening.
This made defensive adjustments much more difficult for Philadelphia.
Rebounding Advantage
Every additional rebound represented another opportunity to score while denying Philadelphia second chances.
The Bulls consistently won those physical battles.
Ball Distribution
Chicago’s willingness to make the extra pass resulted in cleaner looks from both inside and beyond the arc.
Their assist total reflected disciplined offensive execution.
Closing the Game
Perhaps the defining feature of the contest was Chicago’s composure during the closing minutes.
The Bulls remained patient offensively while tightening their defense, allowing them to outscore Philadelphia by 11 points in the final quarter.
Complete Game Summary
The 76ers vs chicago bulls match player stats reveal far more than a seven-point victory.
Philadelphia featured the game’s highest scorer in Joel Embiid, yet Chicago proved that balanced basketball often outperforms individual brilliance.
The Bulls controlled important team categories, including:
- Field-goal percentage
- Three-point percentage
- Rebounds
- Assists
- Fourth-quarter scoring
Those advantages outweighed Philadelphia’s strengths in free-throw shooting and turnover control.
For coaches, analysts, and fans, this matchup serves as an excellent reminder that efficiency, teamwork, and execution frequently determine NBA outcomes more than star power alone.
The Bulls improved to 15–15, extended their season-series lead to 2–0, and continued demonstrating that collective contributions can be the deciding factor against elite individual performances.
Statistical Leaders
The box score highlights several performances that shaped the outcome of the game.
| Category | Philadelphia 76ers | Chicago Bulls |
| Leading Scorer | Joel Embiid – 31 points | Zach Collins – 15 points |
| Co Leading Scorer | None | Tre Jones – 15 points |
| Team Field Goal Percentage | 38% | 44% |
| Three Point Percentage | 28% | 34% |
| Free Throw Percentage | 88% | 76% |
| Total Rebounds | 46 | 52 |
| Assists | 22 | 31 |
| Turnovers | 8 | 11 |
| Steals | 7 | 3 |
| Blocks | 4 | 6 |
These numbers underline the contrast between the two teams. Philadelphia relied heavily on one elite scorer, while Chicago spread its offensive production across multiple players and excelled in the areas that often decide close games.
Starting Lineups
Philadelphia 76ers Starters
- Paul George
- Dominick Barlow
- Joel Embiid
- Tyrese Maxey
- VJ Edgecombe
Philadelphia entered the game with an experienced core supported by young talent. Joel Embiid remained the focal point of the offense, while Tyrese Maxey and Paul George handled much of the perimeter creation.
Chicago Bulls Starters
- Isaac Okoro
- Matas Buzelis
- Nikola Vucevic
- Coby White
- Josh Giddey
Chicago’s lineup emphasized versatility. Every starter could contribute in multiple ways, whether through scoring, passing, rebounding, or defense, making the Bulls much less predictable on the offensive end.
Bench Comparison
Depth often separates winning and losing teams during an 82 game NBA season, and this contest was another example.
Philadelphia Bench
- Jabari Walker
- Justin Edwards
- Andre Drummond
- Adem Bona
- Quentin Grimes
- Jared McCain
Did Not Play
- Johni Broome
- Kyle Lowry
- Eric Gordon
Although the bench provided valuable energy, Philadelphia lacked the consistent scoring punch needed to support Embiid during the closing stages.
Chicago Bench
- Zach Collins
- Jalen Smith
- Kevin Huerter
- Tre Jones
- Ayo Dosunmu
Did Not Play
- Patrick Williams
- Dalen Terry
- Julian Phillips
- Jevon Carter
Chicago’s reserves clearly made the greater impact. Zach Collins and Tre Jones combined for 30 points, giving the Bulls the offensive boost required to complete their comeback.
Season Series Update
This victory strengthened Chicago’s position in the season series.
| Matchup | Result |
| November 5, 2025 | Bulls 113, 76ers 111 |
| December 27, 2025 | Bulls 109, 76ers 102 |
After two meetings, the Bulls held a 2 to 0 advantage.
The next scheduled meeting listed for the season was on March 26, where Chicago again defeated Philadelphia by 157 to 137, completing another high-scoring performance.
Tactical Takeaways
Statistics only explain part of the story. Watching how the game unfolded provides additional insight into why Chicago succeeded.
Chicago Trusted Team Basketball
One of the biggest lessons from this matchup was the value of sharing offensive responsibility.
Instead of asking one player to score 30 or 40 points, the Bulls consistently created open opportunities for whoever had the best look.
Their 31 assists reflected disciplined decision making rather than individual heroics.
Philadelphia Needed More Secondary Scoring
Joel Embiid performed exactly as expected from an MVP calibre player.
However, successful playoff calibre teams usually require multiple players to contribute offensively. Chicago’s defensive strategy forced Philadelphia’s supporting cast into difficult situations, reducing overall offensive efficiency.
Rebounding Won Important Possessions
Chicago’s six rebound advantage may not appear overwhelming at first glance, but several of those rebounds came during critical moments late in the fourth quarter.
Securing defensive rebounds prevented Philadelphia from earning valuable second chance opportunities.
Efficient Basketball Beat High Volume Shooting
Philadelphia attempted 93 field goals compared with Chicago’s 86.
Normally, taking more shots creates an advantage.
In this case, Chicago’s superior efficiency outweighed Philadelphia’s extra attempts, demonstrating that shot quality often matters more than shot quantity.
Lessons for Both Teams
Philadelphia 76ers
The positives included:
- Joel Embiid continued playing at an elite level.
- The team committed only eight turnovers.
- Free throw shooting remained excellent at 88 percent.
Areas requiring improvement included:
- Better perimeter shooting.
- More consistent fourth quarter execution.
- Increased offensive production from role players.
- Higher overall shooting efficiency.
Chicago Bulls
The Bulls left the game with several encouraging signs.
Strengths included:
- Excellent ball movement.
- Strong rebounding.
- Balanced scoring.
- Efficient shooting.
- Quality bench production.
- Composure during crunch time.
Maintaining those habits would be essential as the season progressed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Philadelphia 76ers vs Chicago Bulls game on December 27, 2025?
The Chicago Bulls defeated the Philadelphia 76ers by a final score of 109 to 102 at the United Center in Chicago.
Who scored the most points in the game?
Joel Embiid led all players with 31 points for the Philadelphia 76ers.
Who were the leading scorers for the Chicago Bulls?
Zach Collins and Tre Jones shared the team lead with 15 points each.
Which team had more rebounds?
Chicago finished with 52 rebounds, while Philadelphia collected 46, giving the Bulls a significant edge on the boards.
Why did the Bulls win despite Joel Embiid scoring 31 points?
Chicago won because of better shooting efficiency, superior rebounding, outstanding ball movement with 31 assists, balanced scoring, and a dominant fourth quarter.
Conclusion
The 76ers vs chicago bulls match player stats provide a clear picture of how teamwork can overcome individual brilliance. Joel Embiid delivered the game’s best scoring performance with 31 points, but Chicago’s balanced attack, efficient shooting, rebounding advantage, and excellent ball movement proved to be the difference. The Bulls executed more effectively during the closing minutes, outscoring Philadelphia in the fourth quarter and securing a deserved 109 to 102 victory. For anyone analysing this matchup, the numbers demonstrate that success in the NBA often comes from consistent execution across the entire roster rather than relying on a single star.
