Tennessee Titans vs 49ers Match Player Stats

The tennessee titans vs 49ers match player stats provide a detailed look at how the San Francisco 49ers secured a 37-24 victory over the Tennessee Titans in their NFL regular season matchup on December 15, 2025. Beyond the final score, the individual performances reveal important details about quarterback efficiency, rushing production, defensive impact, and the moments that changed the direction of the game.

This matchup was a clear example of how offensive execution and situational football can decide an NFL contest. The 49ers controlled the game through efficient passing, balanced offensive movement, and strong scoring opportunities, while the Titans showed competitive moments through explosive rushing plays and late-game production. Looking deeper into the numbers helps explain why San Francisco improved to a 10-4 record while Tennessee dropped to 2-12.

Analyzing player statistics is not only about identifying who scored touchdowns or gained the most yards. Advanced evaluation requires understanding efficiency, decision-making, defensive pressure, and how individual contributions influenced the overall team performance. This breakdown examines the complete box score, standout players, team trends, and the tactical lessons behind the result.

Match Overview and Final Score Breakdown

The Tennessee Titans and San Francisco 49ers met during the 2025 NFL regular season, with the 49ers entering the contest as the stronger team based on their season record. San Francisco finished the game with a 37-24 win, using a productive offensive approach that combined accurate quarterback play with consistent scoring drives.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring showed how the game developed:

Quarter	Tennessee Titans	San Francisco 49ers
First Quarter	3	7
Second Quarter	7	10
Third Quarter	0	14
Fourth Quarter	14	6
Final Score	24	37

The third quarter was the biggest turning point. San Francisco scored 14 unanswered points during that period, creating enough separation to control the remainder of the game. Tennessee attempted a late comeback with 14 points in the fourth quarter, but the deficit was too large to overcome.

From a statistical perspective, the game showed two different offensive identities. Tennessee relied more heavily on rushing efficiency and short-area passing, while San Francisco created bigger advantages through quarterback accuracy and receiving production.

Tennessee Titans vs 49ers Match Player Stats: Quarterback Performance Analysis

Quarterback play was one of the biggest differences between the two teams. Both starting quarterbacks protected the football by avoiding interceptions, but Brock Purdy produced a significantly more efficient passing performance.

Brock Purdy’s Efficient Performance Leads San Francisco

San Francisco quarterback Brock Purdy delivered one of the strongest individual performances of the game. His final passing statistics were:

• Completions: 23
• Attempts: 30
• Passing yards: 292
• Touchdowns: 3
• Interceptions: 0
• Passer rating: 140.3

Purdy completed 76.7% of his passes, showing excellent accuracy and decision-making. His ability to consistently move the ball through the air prevented Tennessee’s defense from focusing only on stopping the running game.

A passer rating above 140 represents an extremely efficient performance. The most impressive part of Purdy’s outing was his ability to create scoring opportunities without making costly mistakes. He distributed the football effectively and allowed multiple receivers to contribute.

His three touchdown passes were a major factor behind San Francisco’s offensive success. The Titans defense managed pressure moments, but Purdy consistently responded with accurate throws.

Cam Ward Provides Positive Moments for Tennessee

Tennessee quarterback Cam Ward also produced a solid statistical performance despite the loss. His numbers included:

• Completions: 18
• Attempts: 29
• Passing yards: 170
• Touchdowns: 2
• Interceptions: 0
• Passer rating: 101.2

Ward completed nearly 62% of his passes and avoided turnovers, which helped Tennessee remain competitive. However, the difference between the two quarterbacks came mainly through passing volume and explosive plays.

While Ward managed two touchdown passes, Tennessee’s passing attack generated 170 yards compared with San Francisco’s 292 passing yards. That gap created additional pressure on the Titans defense.

The quarterback comparison shows an important NFL lesson: avoiding mistakes is valuable, but efficient production and consistent explosive plays often determine the final outcome.

Rushing Statistics and Ground Game Comparison

The running game presented an interesting contrast between the two teams. Tennessee actually produced slightly better rushing efficiency, but San Francisco generated more overall control through volume and offensive balance.

Tony Pollard Leads Titans Running Attack

Tennessee running back Tony Pollard was the team’s top rushing performer. His statistics:

• Carries: 14
• Rushing yards: 104
• Touchdowns: 1
• Longest run: 22 yards

Pollard averaged 7.4 yards per carry, making him one of the most efficient offensive players on the Titans roster during this matchup.

His ability to create explosive runs gave Tennessee an offensive advantage in certain situations. The Titans finished with:

• Total carries: 20
• Rushing yards: 136
• Touchdowns: 1
• Average per carry: 6.8 yards

The numbers show that Tennessee’s rushing attack was effective whenever it received opportunities.

Christian McCaffrey Provides Consistent Production

For San Francisco, Christian McCaffrey remained an important part of the offensive structure. His rushing totals:

• Carries: 22
• Rushing yards: 73
• Touchdowns: 1
• Longest run: 9 yards

Although McCaffrey did not produce a huge average per carry, his workload helped maintain offensive balance. San Francisco finished with:

• Total carries: 38
• Rushing yards: 138
• Touchdowns: 1
• Average per carry: 3.6 yards

The difference was not explosive rushing efficiency but consistency. The 49ers used their running game to control possession and keep Tennessee’s defense from becoming too aggressive against the pass.

Receiving Leaders and Passing Game Impact

The receiving statistics explain why San Francisco created such a large offensive advantage. The 49ers produced 295 receiving yards compared with Tennessee’s 170.

San Francisco Receiving Production

The leading receiving performances included:

Ricky Pearsall

• Receptions: 6
• Receiving yards: 96

Pearsall led San Francisco in receiving yards and consistently helped extend drives. His ability to gain separation created additional opportunities for Purdy.

Jauan Jennings

• Receptions: 3
• Receiving yards: 37
• Touchdowns: 2

Jennings became the primary scoring target through the air. His two touchdown receptions played a major role in building San Francisco’s advantage.

Overall, San Francisco’s receiving totals:

• Receptions: 23
• Receiving yards: 295
• Touchdowns: 3

The balanced distribution allowed the 49ers offense to remain unpredictable.

Tennessee Receiving Production

Tennessee’s passing attack produced:

• Receptions: 18
• Receiving yards: 170
• Touchdowns: 2

The leading receiver was Gunnar Helm:

• Receptions: 4
• Receiving yards: 49
• Touchdown: 1

The Titans received contributions from multiple players, but they lacked the same level of explosive passing production as San Francisco.

The receiving comparison highlights one of the biggest statistical differences in the game. San Francisco gained an additional 125 receiving yards, creating more scoring opportunities and better field position throughout the contest.

Defensive Performance Breakdown: Tackles, Pressure, and Key Stops

Defense played a major role in shaping the momentum of the game. Although the final score favored San Francisco, both teams produced notable individual defensive performances. The tennessee titans vs 49ers match player stats show that Tennessee recorded more total defensive activity, while San Francisco focused on limiting scoring opportunities and controlling key situations.

Cedric Gray Leads Tennessee Defense

Linebacker Cedric Gray was the standout defensive player for Tennessee. His performance included:

• Total tackles: 16
• Sacks: Part of a team effort that produced 2 sacks
• Defensive involvement: High impact throughout the game

Gray’s tackle total shows how frequently Tennessee’s defense was involved in stopping plays. When an offense controls possession and creates multiple drives, linebackers often become heavily involved because they must defend both rushing attempts and short passing plays.

Tennessee’s overall defensive statistics:

• Total tackles: 85
• Sacks: 2
• Tackles for loss: 5
• Pass defenses: 2
• Quarterback hits: 5

The Titans showed defensive effort, especially in tackling and limiting mistakes. However, they struggled to consistently slow down San Francisco’s passing attack.

Malik Mustapha Provides Defensive Leadership for San Francisco

For the 49ers, Malik Mustapha led the defense with:

• Total tackles: 10

San Francisco’s defensive numbers were different from Tennessee’s:

• Total tackles: 57
• Sacks: 0
• Tackles for loss: 1
• Pass defenses: 2
• Quarterback hits: 3

The lower tackle count was partly influenced by San Francisco controlling more of the game offensively. When a team maintains possession and builds a lead, the defense generally spends fewer snaps on the field.

Although the 49ers did not record a sack, they successfully limited Tennessee’s scoring opportunities during important moments. Defensive success is not always measured only by sacks. Preventing explosive plays and forcing longer drives can be equally valuable.

Turnovers and Ball Security Analysis

Turnovers often determine NFL outcomes, but this matchup was unusual because neither team recorded an interception.

Tennessee Protects the Football

The Titans avoided major mistakes:

• Interceptions thrown: 0
• Fumbles lost: 0

Kaiir Elam recovered one fumble for Tennessee, helping prevent an additional San Francisco opportunity.

Ball security allowed Tennessee to remain competitive despite offensive limitations. However, avoiding turnovers alone was not enough because the Titans struggled to match San Francisco’s scoring efficiency.

San Francisco Experiences One Costly Mistake

San Francisco quarterback Brock Purdy recorded:

• Fumbles: 1
• Fumbles lost: 1

That mistake gave Tennessee an opportunity, but the Titans were unable to fully capitalize.

The turnover comparison shows that the game was not decided by giveaways. Instead, offensive efficiency, especially through the passing game, created the biggest separation.

Special Teams Performance and Field Position Battle

Special teams often receives less attention than offense and defense, but it can influence field position and scoring opportunities. In this matchup, kicking accuracy created a clear advantage for San Francisco.

Kicking Comparison

Tennessee Titans: Joey Slye

Statistics:

• Field goals: 1/2
• Long field goal: 25 yards
• Extra points: 3/3
• Total points: 6

Slye contributed six points, but missing one field goal opportunity reduced Tennessee’s scoring efficiency.

San Francisco 49ers: Eddy Pineiro

Statistics:

• Field goals: 3/3
• Long field goal: 40 yards
• Extra points: 4/4
• Total points: 13

Pineiro’s perfect kicking performance added important points and helped maintain San Francisco’s control.

The difference was significant:

• Tennessee kicking points: 6
• San Francisco kicking points: 13

A seven-point advantage from special teams is meaningful in an NFL game.

Return Game and Field Position Contributions

Return performances also influenced starting field position.

Tennessee Return Production

Chimere Dike led Tennessee’s kick return unit:

• Returns: 4
• Return yards: 90
• Average: 22.5 yards

His ability to generate consistent returns helped Tennessee avoid poor field position situations.

San Francisco Return Production

San Francisco’s leaders:

Brian Robinson Jr.

• Returns: 2
• Return yards: 53
• Average: 26.5 yards

Skyy Moore

• Punt returns: 1
• Punt return yards: 18

The 49ers gained slightly better average production from kick returns, supporting their overall field position advantage.

Key Factors That Decided the Game

Looking beyond individual numbers, several factors explain why San Francisco won.

1. Passing Efficiency Created the Biggest Difference

The biggest statistical advantage came through the passing game.

Comparison:

Category	Tennessee	San Francisco
Passing Yards	170	292
Passing Touchdowns	2	3
Interceptions	0	0

San Francisco gained 122 more passing yards, giving the offense more opportunities to score.

Brock Purdy’s accuracy allowed the 49ers to consistently move the chains. Tennessee struggled to create the same level of offensive rhythm.

2. Third Quarter Dominance Changed Momentum

The third quarter was the turning point.

San Francisco scored:

• 14 points in the third quarter

Tennessee scored:

• 0 points in the third quarter

That 14-point swing transformed a competitive game into a difficult comeback situation for the Titans.

Strong teams often separate themselves through adjustments after halftime, and San Francisco executed those adjustments effectively.

3. Red Zone Execution

Touchdowns rather than field goals often decide NFL games. San Francisco’s ability to finish drives helped create the final margin.

The 49ers recorded:

• 3 passing touchdowns
• 1 rushing touchdown

Tennessee recorded:

• 2 passing touchdowns
• 1 rushing touchdown

Both teams scored four offensive touchdowns combined, but San Francisco added more points through field goals and better overall efficiency.

What the Statistics Reveal About Each Team

The numbers tell a deeper story about the strengths and weaknesses of both teams.

Tennessee Titans: Positive Takeaways

Despite the loss, Tennessee showed several encouraging signs:

• Tony Pollard created explosive rushing plays.
• Cam Ward avoided interceptions.
• The defense produced 85 tackles.
• The team remained competitive in the fourth quarter.

The Titans demonstrated that they could generate offensive production, but maintaining consistency over four quarters remained a challenge.

San Francisco 49ers: Signs of a Complete Team Performance

The 49ers displayed the qualities expected from a team competing near the top of the standings:

• Efficient quarterback play
• Multiple receiving contributors
• Balanced rushing workload
• Reliable kicking performance
• Strong game management

The victory improved San Francisco’s record to 10-4 and showed why they were able to control the matchup.

How Fans Should Interpret Player Statistics Beyond the Box Score

Box scores provide important information, but understanding football requires additional context. A player with fewer yards may still influence the game through blocking, route creation, defensive attention, or situational execution.

For example, Christian McCaffrey’s rushing average was lower than Tony Pollard’s, but his 22 carries helped San Francisco maintain offensive balance. Similarly, defensive players like Malik Mustapha contributed through consistent tackling even without producing sacks.

For deeper football statistics and official league information, fans can also review resources from the National Football League official statistics when comparing player performances.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was the top quarterback in the Tennessee Titans vs 49ers matchup?

Brock Purdy was the top quarterback statistically. He completed 23 of 30 passes for 292 yards, three touchdowns, zero interceptions, and a 140.3 passer rating.

Who led the Titans in rushing against the 49ers?

Tony Pollard led Tennessee’s rushing attack with 14 carries for 104 yards and one touchdown.

Which 49ers receiver had the most receiving yards?

Ricky Pearsall led San Francisco in receiving yards with six receptions for 96 yards.

Who recorded the most tackles in the game?

Tennessee linebacker Cedric Gray recorded the most tackles with 16 total tackles.

Did either team throw an interception?

No. Both Tennessee and San Francisco finished the game without an interception.

What was the final score between the Titans and 49ers?

The San Francisco 49ers defeated the Tennessee Titans 37-24 on December 15, 2025.

Conclusion

The tennessee titans vs 49ers match player stats show that San Francisco’s victory was built on efficient quarterback play, stronger passing production, and consistent scoring execution. Brock Purdy’s accurate performance and the 49ers receiving group created a major advantage through the air, while the defense successfully managed Tennessee’s offensive threats.

Tennessee showed competitive moments, especially through Tony Pollard’s rushing performance and Cedric Gray’s defensive effort. However, the Titans could not overcome San Francisco’s third-quarter surge and overall offensive efficiency.

The matchup demonstrates why analyzing complete player statistics provides a clearer picture than simply looking at the final score. Passing efficiency, field position, defensive execution, and situational football all combined to determine the outcome.