Connecticut Sun vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats

The connecticut sun vs indiana fever match player stats tell the story of a game where efficiency, timely shooting, and balanced scoring helped the Indiana Fever secure an impressive 85 to 75 victory over the Connecticut Sun in the WNBA Commissioner’s Cup. Played on June 14, 2026, at Mohegan Sun Arena in Uncasville, Connecticut, the matchup highlighted the strengths of Indiana’s offensive execution while exposing some of the challenges Connecticut faced against one of the league’s rising contenders.

Statistics alone never reveal the entire story of a basketball game, but when viewed alongside team performance, momentum swings, and individual contributions, they provide valuable insight into why one team controlled the outcome. Indiana entered the contest with an 8 and 5 record and continued building confidence with another strong performance. Connecticut, meanwhile, fell to 2 and 13 despite showing moments of competitiveness throughout the game.

This complete analysis examines every major statistical category, evaluates the performances of the game’s standout players, and explains how those numbers translated into Indiana’s tenth-point victory.

Match Overview

Match Detail	Information
Competition	WNBA Commissioner’s Cup
Date	June 14, 2026
Venue	Mohegan Sun Arena
Location	Uncasville, Connecticut
Attendance	8,910
Final Score	Indiana Fever 85, Connecticut Sun 75
Winner	Indiana Fever
Indiana Record	8 and 5
Connecticut Record	2 and 13

Indiana entered the contest looking to continue its strong form, while Connecticut hoped to gain momentum after a difficult start to the season. The result reflected the current direction of both teams, with Indiana executing efficiently on both ends of the floor while Connecticut struggled to maintain consistency during key stretches.

Although the final margin was ten points, the game remained competitive for much of the opening half before Indiana gradually separated itself through efficient shooting and stronger rebounding.

Connecticut Sun vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats Breakdown

The connecticut sun vs indiana fever match player stats demonstrate that Indiana succeeded by maximizing offensive efficiency rather than dominating every statistical category.

Team Statistics Comparison

Category	Indiana Fever	Connecticut Sun
Points	85	75
Field Goals	30 of 61 (49%)	32 of 75 (43%)
Three Point Shooting	12 of 29 (41%)	5 of 17 (29%)
Free Throws	13 of 19 (68%)	6 of 9 (67%)
Total Rebounds	38	26
Offensive Rebounds	9	9
Defensive Rebounds	29	17
Assists	19	24
Turnovers	17	9
Steals	4	7
Blocks	5	4
Personal Fouls	16	22

Several numbers immediately stand out.

Indiana actually committed nearly twice as many turnovers as Connecticut, yet still won comfortably. Normally, losing the turnover battle makes winning difficult, but Indiana compensated by shooting far more efficiently from the field and beyond the three point line.

The Fever also dominated defensive rebounding, limiting Connecticut’s opportunities to generate second chance points.

Why Indiana Fever Won Despite More Turnovers

One of the most interesting aspects of this matchup was Indiana’s ability to overcome 17 turnovers.

Usually, protecting the basketball is one of the strongest indicators of victory. Connecticut committed only nine turnovers, giving itself additional possessions throughout the game.

However, basketball games are decided by how effectively teams convert possessions into points rather than simply how many possessions they have.

Indiana excelled in several important areas.

Outstanding Shooting Efficiency

Indiana converted nearly half of its field goal attempts.

• 49 percent overall shooting
• 41 percent from three point range
• Twelve made three pointers

Connecticut finished with respectable overall shooting but struggled from long distance.

• 43 percent field goals
• 29 percent from beyond the arc
• Only five made three pointers

That seven three pointer difference represented a major scoring advantage.

Dominance on the Glass

Rebounding often determines who controls the pace of a game.

Indiana collected:

• 38 total rebounds
• 29 defensive rebounds

Connecticut managed:

• 26 total rebounds
• 17 defensive rebounds

This advantage allowed Indiana to end defensive possessions quickly while creating more transition opportunities.

Aliyah Boston played a major role in that effort, controlling the paint and consistently limiting Connecticut’s second chance opportunities.

Better Offensive Balance

Indiana did not rely on one player to carry the offense.

Instead, multiple contributors reached double figures.

Indiana’s leading scorers included:

Player	Points
Caitlin Clark	25
Kelsey Mitchell	19
Aliyah Boston	13
Sophie Cunningham	11
Monique Billings	10

Five players scoring at least ten points made Indiana much more difficult to defend.

Connecticut also had balanced scoring but lacked a dominant offensive performer capable of matching Clark’s production.

Player	Points
Olivia Nelson Ododa	12
Leila Lacan	11
Brittney Griner	10
Kennedy Burke	10

Without a twenty point scorer, Connecticut struggled to answer Indiana’s offensive runs.

Quarter by Quarter Analysis

Breaking down each quarter helps explain how momentum shifted throughout the contest.

First Quarter

Indiana Fever: 30

Connecticut Sun: 29

The opening quarter featured fast paced basketball from both teams.

Indiana immediately established confidence offensively, knocking down perimeter shots while pushing the pace in transition.

Connecticut responded well with efficient interior scoring and kept the contest close through aggressive ball movement.

Despite Indiana finishing the quarter ahead by just one point, the Fever had already demonstrated greater offensive rhythm.

The opening twelve minutes suggested fans were in for a tightly contested game.

Second Quarter

Indiana Fever: 17

Connecticut Sun: 9

This period ultimately became the turning point.

Indiana’s defense tightened considerably.

Connecticut found quality opportunities increasingly difficult to create, while Indiana continued generating efficient possessions.

Holding any WNBA team to only nine points in a quarter represents a significant defensive achievement.

Indiana entered halftime with valuable momentum and a comfortable lead that shifted pressure onto Connecticut for the remainder of the contest.

Third Quarter

Indiana Fever: 16

Connecticut Sun: 22

To Connecticut’s credit, the Sun refused to let the game slip away quietly.

Their offense improved dramatically after halftime.

Ball movement became sharper.

Shot selection improved.

Players attacked the basket with greater confidence.

Although Connecticut outscored Indiana during the quarter, the Fever avoided a complete collapse by making enough timely baskets to preserve their overall advantage entering the fourth period.

Fourth Quarter

Indiana Fever: 22

Connecticut Sun: 15

Championship caliber teams often finish games with composure.

Indiana displayed exactly that quality.

Whenever Connecticut attempted to reduce the deficit, Indiana answered with efficient offense and disciplined execution.

Late in the game, Caitlin Clark and the supporting cast consistently made winning plays, whether through perimeter shooting, defensive rebounding, or smart decision making.

Indiana closed the contest confidently, extending the lead and securing the 85 to 75 victory.

Indiana Fever Starting Lineup Performance

Indiana’s starting five combined experience, shooting, and interior presence throughout the contest.

Starters

• Monique Billings
• Aliyah Boston
• Kelsey Mitchell
• Lexie Hull
• Caitlin Clark

Each starter contributed in different ways.

Clark controlled the offense while also leading the team in scoring.

Mitchell provided another dependable scoring option, preventing Connecticut from focusing its entire defensive strategy on Clark.

Boston anchored the frontcourt with scoring, rebounding, and playmaking.

Billings contributed valuable interior scoring and defensive effort.

Hull’s impact extended beyond the box score through perimeter defense, spacing, and hustle plays that helped maintain Indiana’s overall balance.

Rather than depending on isolation basketball, Indiana consistently moved the ball, creating opportunities for multiple players to influence the outcome.

This balanced offensive structure has become one of the team’s defining characteristics and was clearly reflected throughout this matchup.

Connecticut Sun Starting Lineup Performance

Connecticut entered the game with a lineup that combined experienced veterans and developing young talent. While the Sun showed flashes of quality basketball, particularly in the first and third quarters, they struggled to maintain the same level of execution over the full forty minutes.

Starters

• Aaliyah Edwards
• Diamond Miller
• Brittney Griner
• Saniya Rivers
• Leila Lacan

The starting unit worked hard to keep Connecticut competitive, but Indiana’s defensive adjustments limited their ability to build consistent scoring runs. Ball movement remained one of Connecticut’s strengths throughout the game, yet missed perimeter shots and rebounding disadvantages ultimately reduced the effectiveness of that passing.

Brittney Griner provided an experienced presence inside the paint, while Leila Lacan played an important role as both a scorer and facilitator. Aaliyah Edwards contributed defensively and battled on the boards, although Indiana’s frontcourt often controlled the rebounding battle.

The starting five demonstrated resilience, especially after halftime, but could not completely erase the deficit created during the second quarter.

Bench Contributions

Every successful team depends on production beyond its starting lineup, and this matchup was no exception. Indiana’s reserves delivered valuable scoring and energy when called upon, while Connecticut received encouraging performances from several young players.

Indiana Fever Bench

Indiana’s bench included:

• Myisha Hines Allen
• Makayla Timpson
• Sophie Cunningham
• Tyasha Harris
• Raven Johnson
• Grace VanSlooten
• Damiris Dantas
• Justine Pissott
• Bree Hall

The most notable contribution came from Sophie Cunningham, who scored 11 points off the bench. Her ability to stretch the floor gave Indiana another perimeter threat and prevented Connecticut from concentrating solely on defending the starting backcourt.

Strong bench production allowed Indiana to keep its intensity high even while rotating players, an important factor during the second half.

Connecticut Sun Bench

Connecticut’s reserves featured:

• Aneesah Morrow
• Raegan Beers
• Nell Angloma
• Olivia Nelson Ododa
• Kennedy Burke
• Charlisse Leger Walker
• Hailey Van Lith
• Gianna Kneepkens
• Ashlon Jackson

Among the reserves, Olivia Nelson Ododa delivered the most productive performance.

She finished with:

• 12 points
• 7 rebounds

Her activity around the basket gave Connecticut valuable interior scoring, particularly during stretches when the offense struggled from outside.

Kennedy Burke also reached double figures with 10 points, helping the Sun remain competitive despite facing a double digit deficit for much of the second half.

The bench showed encouraging depth, but Indiana’s overall efficiency ultimately proved more difficult to match.

Top Individual Performers

Several players stood out statistically, producing performances that significantly influenced the outcome.

Caitlin Clark Leads Indiana Once Again

Caitlin Clark once again demonstrated why she remains one of the league’s premier guards.

Her final numbers included:

• 25 points
• 5 assists

Although scoring often receives the most attention, Clark’s decision making throughout the game was equally valuable. She consistently recognized defensive rotations, created open looks for teammates, and controlled the pace whenever Connecticut attempted to build momentum.

Her outside shooting stretched Connecticut’s defense, creating additional driving lanes for teammates and making Indiana’s offense far more difficult to defend.

Beyond the statistics, Clark displayed strong leadership by maintaining composure during important stretches of the game.

Kelsey Mitchell Continues Her Consistency

Mitchell contributed another efficient offensive performance with 19 points.

Rather than relying on one player to generate offense, Indiana benefited from Mitchell’s ability to score from multiple areas of the floor.

Whether attacking the basket or knocking down perimeter jumpers, she remained a reliable scoring option throughout all four quarters.

Her partnership with Clark continues to give Indiana one of the league’s more dangerous backcourts.

Aliyah Boston Controls the Interior

Boston delivered one of the most complete performances of the game.

Her stat line included:

• 13 points
• 11 rebounds
• 5 assists

Recording a double double while also sharing the team lead in assists illustrates her all around impact.

Boston consistently protected the paint, secured defensive rebounds, and initiated offensive possessions with smart passing.

Her physical presence also limited Connecticut’s opportunities for second chance scoring.

Olivia Nelson Ododa Provides Energy

Connecticut’s most productive scorer was Olivia Nelson Ododa.

She recorded:

• 12 points
• 7 rebounds

Her effort around the basket kept Connecticut within striking distance during several important stretches.

She consistently attacked offensive rebounds and finished efficiently near the rim, giving the Sun valuable production from the frontcourt.

Leila Lacan Shows Promise

Leila Lacan quietly assembled one of the most balanced performances for Connecticut.

Her statistics included:

• 11 points
• 7 assists

Seven assists reflected her ability to involve teammates while also creating scoring opportunities for herself.

Despite the loss, Lacan demonstrated encouraging playmaking ability that could become increasingly important as the season progresses.

Statistical Leaders

Indiana Fever

Category	Player	Total
Points	Caitlin Clark	25
Rebounds	Aliyah Boston	11
Assists	Caitlin Clark	5
Assists	Kelsey Mitchell	5
Assists	Aliyah Boston	5

Indiana’s balanced distribution of assists highlights how effectively the offense shared playmaking responsibilities.

Instead of depending on one primary facilitator, multiple players helped organize possessions and create quality shots.

Connecticut Sun

Category	Player	Total
Points	Olivia Nelson Ododa	12
Rebounds	Olivia Nelson Ododa	7
Assists	Leila Lacan	7

Although Connecticut lacked a dominant scorer, the team continued to move the basketball effectively, as reflected by Lacan’s assist total and the team’s overall passing numbers.

Shooting Efficiency Comparison

One of the clearest differences between both teams appeared in shooting efficiency.

Indiana Fever

• Field Goal Percentage: 49 percent
• Three Point Percentage: 41 percent
• Free Throw Percentage: 68 percent

Indiana generated high quality scoring opportunities throughout the game. Their spacing allowed shooters to operate comfortably, while strong ball movement prevented Connecticut from consistently loading the defense against one player.

Making twelve three pointers proved especially important, as those additional points gradually widened the gap on the scoreboard.

Connecticut Sun

• Field Goal Percentage: 43 percent
• Three Point Percentage: 29 percent
• Free Throw Percentage: 67 percent

Connecticut actually attempted more field goals because it committed fewer turnovers.

However, the lower shooting percentages reduced the value of those extra possessions.

The Sun also struggled from beyond the arc, converting only five three pointers. Against an opponent shooting over forty percent from long range, matching perimeter production becomes essential.

That shooting difference became one of the defining stories of the game.

Rebounding Battle

Rebounding often receives less attention than scoring, yet it frequently determines the outcome of closely contested games.

Indiana finished with a significant advantage.

Rebounding Category	Indiana	Connecticut
Offensive Rebounds	9	9
Defensive Rebounds	29	17
Total Rebounds	38	26

While both teams collected the same number of offensive rebounds, Indiana dominated the defensive glass.

Those additional defensive rebounds prevented Connecticut from extending possessions and helped Indiana quickly transition into offense.

Aliyah Boston’s presence inside was instrumental in securing those rebounds, while the guards also contributed by crashing the defensive boards.

For Connecticut, improving defensive rebounding remains an area that could significantly improve future performances, particularly against teams with multiple scoring threats.

Ball Movement and Assist Analysis

While scoring usually dominates postgame discussions, passing efficiency often reveals how well a team functioned offensively. This matchup presented an interesting contrast between ball movement and shooting efficiency.

Connecticut actually finished with 24 assists, compared to 19 assists for Indiana. On the surface, that suggests the Sun shared the basketball more effectively. However, the overall offensive results tell a more complete story.

Indiana generated better quality scoring opportunities, particularly from three point range. Instead of focusing solely on creating assisted baskets, the Fever capitalized on transition opportunities, individual shot creation, and efficient perimeter shooting.

Connecticut moved the ball well throughout the contest, but too many quality possessions ended with missed shots.

Team Assist Comparison

Team	Assists
Connecticut Sun	24
Indiana Fever	19

The assist numbers show that Connecticut’s offensive system remained functional despite the loss. The challenge was converting those opportunities into points at a higher percentage.

Indiana, meanwhile, demonstrated that efficiency can outweigh volume. Fewer assists combined with significantly better shooting proved to be the winning formula.

Turnovers Did Not Decide the Game

Another fascinating aspect of the contest was the turnover battle.

Normally, committing nearly twice as many turnovers as your opponent makes winning extremely difficult.

Turnover Comparison

Team	Turnovers
Indiana Fever	17
Connecticut Sun	9

Indiana lost possession 17 times, giving Connecticut several additional scoring opportunities.

However, the Sun failed to fully capitalize on those extra possessions because of three major factors:

• Lower shooting percentage
• Limited three point production
• Difficulty securing defensive rebounds

This game serves as an excellent reminder that turnovers are only one piece of the overall picture. Shooting efficiency and rebounding often have an even greater impact over the course of forty minutes.

Defensive Performance Comparison

Defense shaped the outcome just as much as offense.

Indiana consistently protected the paint while forcing Connecticut into lower percentage perimeter attempts.

Defensive Statistics

Category	Indiana	Connecticut
Steals	4	7
Blocks	5	4
Defensive Rebounds	29	17
Personal Fouls	16	22

Connecticut actually recorded more steals, showing active hands and aggressive perimeter defense.

Indiana responded differently.

Instead of gambling for steals, the Fever emphasized:

• Contesting shots
• Protecting the rim
• Finishing defensive possessions with rebounds

That disciplined defensive approach reduced Connecticut’s second chance opportunities and limited easy baskets late in the game.

How Caitlin Clark Influenced the Game Beyond Scoring

Although Caitlin Clark finished as Indiana’s leading scorer with 25 points, her influence extended well beyond the scoring column.

Throughout the game, Connecticut frequently adjusted its defensive positioning whenever Clark handled the basketball.

Those adjustments created additional space for teammates.

Several aspects of Clark’s performance stood out:

Offensive Leadership

Clark consistently controlled the tempo.

Rather than forcing difficult shots, she recognized when defenders committed extra attention and found open teammates in advantageous positions.

Floor Spacing

Even when she was not shooting, defenders stayed attached to her on the perimeter.

That spacing opened driving lanes for:

• Kelsey Mitchell
• Aliyah Boston
• Monique Billings

Floor spacing rarely appears in a traditional box score, but it remains one of basketball’s most valuable offensive advantages.

Late Game Decision Making

During the fourth quarter, Indiana avoided costly mistakes by making smart offensive decisions.

Clark played an important role in maintaining composure, helping the Fever respond each time Connecticut attempted to reduce the deficit.

Her complete performance demonstrated why she continues to be one of the league’s most impactful guards.

Aliyah Boston’s All Around Performance

Some performances deserve attention even if they are not the highest scoring efforts.

Aliyah Boston delivered one of the most balanced games on the floor.

Statistical Production

• 13 points
• 11 rebounds
• 5 assists

Recording double digit points while leading the team in rebounds and sharing the team lead in assists illustrates remarkable versatility.

Boston influenced nearly every aspect of the contest.

Interior Defense

She consistently challenged shots around the basket and helped limit easy scoring opportunities.

Rebounding

Her eleven rebounds gave Indiana additional possessions while ending Connecticut’s offensive trips.

Passing

Boston’s five assists highlighted another important part of her game.

Instead of simply finishing plays near the basket, she recognized defensive pressure and created scoring opportunities for teammates.

Modern frontcourt players are increasingly expected to facilitate offense, and Boston continues to excel in that role.

Connecticut’s Bright Spots Despite the Loss

Although the final score favored Indiana, Connecticut produced several encouraging performances that should not be overlooked.

Olivia Nelson Ododa

Leading the team with 12 points while adding 7 rebounds reflected consistent effort around the basket.

Her activity in the paint provided valuable interior scoring throughout the game.

Leila Lacan

Lacan’s combination of:

• 11 points
• 7 assists

showed her ability to balance scoring with playmaking.

She remained composed under defensive pressure and frequently created quality opportunities for teammates.

Team Ball Movement

Connecticut’s 24 assists demonstrated that offensive chemistry continues to develop despite the difficult season.

If the Sun improve their shooting efficiency and rebounding, those passing numbers could translate into significantly better offensive production in future games.

Key Statistical Takeaways

The connecticut sun vs indiana fever match player stats reveal several important trends that explain the final result.

Indiana Fever

• Outstanding 49 percent shooting
• Twelve made three pointers
• Significant rebounding advantage
• Five players scored at least ten points
• Strong fourth quarter execution

Connecticut Sun

• More assists than Indiana
• Fewer turnovers
• Active defensive effort
• Competitive first and third quarters
• Balanced scoring across multiple players

When these statistics are viewed together, the difference becomes clear.

Indiana converted scoring opportunities at a much higher rate while controlling the boards.

Connecticut excelled in passing and protecting the basketball but struggled to match Indiana’s shooting efficiency.

Those contrasting strengths ultimately determined the outcome of the game.

What This Result Means for Both Teams

This victory strengthened Indiana’s position early in the season and demonstrated the team’s growing consistency.

Several encouraging trends emerged:

• Reliable perimeter shooting
• Balanced offensive production
• Strong interior presence
• Improved defensive rebounding
• Effective closing performance

For Connecticut, the loss highlighted several areas requiring improvement.

These include:

• Three point shooting
• Defensive rebounding
• Converting quality ball movement into efficient scoring
• Maintaining defensive intensity throughout all four quarters

Despite the defeat, individual performances from younger contributors offered reasons for optimism as the season continues.

The next scheduled meeting between these teams on August 29, 2026, will provide another opportunity to see whether Connecticut can make the necessary adjustments against an Indiana team that currently leads the season series 2 to 0.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the most important connecticut sun vs indiana fever match player stats from this game?

The standout statistics were Indiana’s 85 to 75 victory, 49 percent field goal shooting, 41 percent three point shooting, and a 38 to 26 rebounding advantage. Caitlin Clark led all scorers with 25 points, while Aliyah Boston recorded a double double with 13 points and 11 rebounds. Connecticut was led by Olivia Nelson Ododa with 12 points and 7 rebounds.

Who was the highest scorer in the Indiana Fever vs Connecticut Sun game?

Caitlin Clark finished as the game’s leading scorer with 25 points. She also added 5 assists and played a key role in controlling Indiana’s offense throughout the contest.

Why did Indiana Fever win despite committing more turnovers?

Indiana committed 17 turnovers compared to Connecticut’s 9, but the Fever made up for it by shooting much more efficiently. They connected on 49 percent of their field goals and 41 percent of their three point attempts while also winning the rebounding battle by 12 rebounds.

Which Connecticut Sun player had the best overall performance?

Olivia Nelson Ododa produced Connecticut’s strongest statistical performance with 12 points and 7 rebounds. Leila Lacan also impressed by contributing 11 points and a team high 7 assists.

How did Aliyah Boston impact the game?

Aliyah Boston delivered one of the most complete performances on the court. She finished with 13 points, 11 rebounds, and 5 assists while anchoring Indiana’s interior defense and helping the Fever dominate the defensive glass.

What does this result mean for the season series?

With this victory, Indiana Fever improved to a 2 and 0 lead in the season series against the Connecticut Sun. The next scheduled meeting between the teams is set for August 29, 2026.

Conclusion

The connecticut sun vs indiana fever match player stats highlight far more than an 85 to 75 final score. They illustrate how efficient shooting, balanced scoring, and dominant rebounding can outweigh disadvantages in other statistical categories such as turnovers. Indiana Fever executed its game plan with discipline, finishing at nearly 50 percent from the field, making 12 three pointers, and controlling the boards throughout the night.

Caitlin Clark once again demonstrated her ability to influence every phase of the game by leading all scorers with 25 points while facilitating the offense when needed. Aliyah Boston complemented that effort with a well rounded double double, and Kelsey Mitchell provided another dependable scoring option. The balanced contributions from Indiana’s starting lineup and bench created an offense that proved difficult for Connecticut to contain.

For the Connecticut Sun, the box score also revealed encouraging signs despite the defeat. The team finished with more assists and fewer turnovers than Indiana, showing that its ball movement and decision making remain strengths. Performances from Olivia Nelson Ododa and Leila Lacan offered positive takeaways, but improving shooting efficiency and defensive rebounding will be essential if Connecticut hopes to reverse future results against strong opponents.

When the numbers are viewed together, the story becomes clear. Indiana maximized its scoring opportunities, controlled the rebounding battle, and delivered the better all around team performance. Those factors ultimately decided the game and helped the Fever extend their lead in the season series.