Denver Broncos vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats
The denver broncos vs las vegas raiders match player stats tell the story of a defensive battle rather than an offensive showcase. Played on November 7, 2025, this AFC West rivalry ended with the Denver Broncos securing a hard-fought 10–7 victory at home. While the final score appears modest, the game featured impactful defensive performances, timely offensive drives, and several momentum-changing plays that shaped the outcome. Fans searching for the denver broncos vs las vegas raiders match player stats are often looking beyond the scoreboard to understand which players made the biggest difference, how each unit performed, and what the numbers reveal about both teams.
The matchup highlighted why statistics should always be viewed within the context of the game itself. Denver improved to 8–2 with an unbeaten 5–0 home record, while Las Vegas dropped to 2–7, continuing its struggles away from home. Although neither offense produced explosive numbers, individual player performances on defense and special teams played a decisive role in determining the winner.
Match Overview
| Match Details | Information |
| Game | Denver Broncos vs. Las Vegas Raiders |
| Date | November 7, 2025 |
| Venue | Denver Broncos Home Stadium |
| Final Score | Denver Broncos 10, Las Vegas Raiders 7 |
| Broncos Record | 8–2 |
| Raiders Record | 2–7 |
| Winner | Denver Broncos |
The contest unfolded as one of the lowest-scoring games of the season. Rather than relying on explosive passing attacks, both teams depended heavily on their defenses and rushing games. Every possession carried significant importance because scoring opportunities were limited throughout the evening.
Denver Broncos vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats Breakdown
A closer examination of the denver broncos vs las vegas raiders match player stats shows just how evenly contested this game remained from kickoff until the final whistle.
Quarter-by-Quarter Score
| Quarter | Raiders | Broncos |
| First | 7 | 0 |
| Second | 0 | 7 |
| Third | 0 | 3 |
| Fourth | 0 | 0 |
| Final | 7 | 10 |
Las Vegas started quickly with the game’s only first-quarter touchdown, giving them early momentum. Denver answered before halftime with a touchdown of its own before adding the decisive field goal during the third quarter. Neither offense managed to score in the final period as both defenses tightened considerably.
How the Game Changed
Watching this contest, one thing became immediately clear. Neither quarterback consistently controlled the game, meaning every turnover, sack, and third-down stop became increasingly valuable.
Denver’s defense consistently pressured Geno Smith, forcing uncomfortable throws and preventing deep passing opportunities. Meanwhile, Las Vegas’ defense produced two interceptions against Bo Nix, keeping the Raiders within striking distance despite their offensive struggles.
Ultimately, Denver’s defense made one more game-changing play than Las Vegas.
Passing Performance Analysis
Passing numbers rarely tell the complete story, but they help explain why this became a defensive contest.
Denver Broncos Passing Stats
| Player | CMP/ATT | Yards | TD | INT | Sacks |
| Bo Nix | 16/28 | 150 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
What Bo Nix Did Well
Bo Nix finished with only 150 passing yards, but his lone touchdown pass proved decisive.
Some important observations include:
- Stayed patient despite defensive pressure.
- Protected field position throughout much of the game.
- Delivered the game’s only passing touchdown.
- Avoided costly sacks for most of the evening.
Areas for Improvement
The two interceptions significantly lowered his quarterback rating. Against stronger opponents, multiple turnovers could easily become the difference between winning and losing.
However, Denver’s coaching staff will likely value the fact that Nix continued making smart decisions after both interceptions instead of forcing additional risky throws.
Raiders Passing Performance
| Player | CMP/ATT | Yards | TD | INT | Sacks |
| Geno Smith | 16/26 | 143 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Kenny Pickett | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Geno Smith completed over half of his passes but struggled throughout the night because Denver consistently collapsed the pocket.
Being sacked six times disrupted offensive rhythm, eliminated several promising drives, and forced the Raiders into long-yardage situations.
One interception further compounded those issues.
Although Smith completed enough short throws to move the chains occasionally, explosive plays simply never developed.
Comparing Both Quarterbacks
| Category | Bo Nix | Geno Smith |
| Passing Yards | 150 | 143 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 1 |
| Completion Percentage | 57.1% | 61.5% |
| Sacks Taken | 1 | 6 |
Interestingly, Geno Smith posted the better completion percentage, yet Bo Nix produced the only passing touchdown.
That single scoring throw ultimately became the game’s biggest offensive play.
Offensive Game Plans
Neither coaching staff entered this matchup expecting a shootout.
Instead, both teams emphasized:
- Ball control
- Conservative passing
- Field position
- Strong defensive support
- Time of possession
Denver executed this formula slightly better, particularly during the second half.
Why Denver Won Despite Limited Offense
Many fans naturally focus on total offensive yards, but football games are rarely decided by one statistic.
Denver succeeded because it excelled in several critical areas.
Defensive Pressure
Recording six sacks dramatically changed Las Vegas’ offensive rhythm.
Red Zone Execution
Denver converted one of its best scoring opportunities into a touchdown.
Las Vegas could not answer after its opening score.
Home Field Advantage
The Broncos remained unbeaten at home, improving to 5–0. Their defense appeared noticeably more confident throughout the game, feeding off the home crowd’s energy.
Early Offensive Standouts
Several offensive players deserve recognition despite the game’s low score.
Bo Nix
Although not statistically dominant, Nix delivered the game’s only touchdown pass and managed the offense efficiently during critical possessions.
J.K. Dobbins
The running back consistently gained positive yardage, allowing Denver to control the clock and avoid predictable passing situations.
Pat Bryant
His 43-yard reception became Denver’s longest offensive play and helped flip field position during an important drive.
Geno Smith
Despite constant pressure, Smith continued competing until the final whistle and avoided multiple turnover-worthy mistakes after his interception.
Ashton Jeanty
The Raiders running back scored their lone touchdown while handling the majority of the rushing workload effectively despite limited running lanes.
Tyler Lockett
Lockett remained Smith’s most reliable receiving option, finishing as the team’s leading receiver.
Denver Broncos Rushing Performance
The Broncos leaned heavily on their ground game to control the pace of the contest. While the rushing attack did not produce explosive runs, it consistently generated manageable situations on second and third down. In a game where every yard mattered, this steady approach proved valuable.
Denver Rushing Statistics
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| J.K. Dobbins | 18 | 77 | 4.3 | 0 | 13 |
Team Rushing Production
| Team | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Denver Broncos | 27 | 84 | 3.1 | 0 |
J.K. Dobbins carried much of the offensive workload. His 77 rushing yards represented the majority of Denver’s production on the ground, and his ability to gain four to five yards on key downs helped keep the offense balanced.
Although Denver failed to score a rushing touchdown, the running game accomplished something equally important by helping the offense maintain possession and shorten the game.
Why the Running Game Mattered
Several moments demonstrated the value of Denver’s rushing attack.
- It reduced pressure on Bo Nix after interceptions.
- It helped control the clock during the second half.
- It forced Las Vegas to respect play-action opportunities.
- It prevented the Raiders’ pass rush from becoming overly aggressive.
These contributions rarely receive as much attention as touchdowns, but they often determine the outcome of close games.
Las Vegas Raiders Rushing Performance
Las Vegas also attempted to establish its rushing attack, with Ashton Jeanty serving as the featured back throughout the evening.
Raiders Rushing Statistics
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Ashton Jeanty | 19 | 60 | 3.2 | 1 | 10 |
Team Rushing Production
| Team | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Las Vegas Raiders | 25 | 74 | 3.0 | 1 |
Jeanty scored the Raiders’ only touchdown, giving Las Vegas an early advantage. However, Denver’s defense quickly adjusted after the opening quarter, limiting running lanes for the remainder of the game.
An average of just 3.2 yards per carry illustrates how difficult it became for the Raiders to sustain drives on the ground.
Comparing the Ground Games
| Category | Broncos | Raiders |
| Team Carries | 27 | 25 |
| Team Rushing Yards | 84 | 74 |
| Average Per Carry | 3.1 | 3.0 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Leading Rusher | J.K. Dobbins | Ashton Jeanty |
Neither rushing attack dominated statistically, but Denver’s ability to produce slightly more consistent gains proved beneficial in maintaining offensive rhythm.
Receiving Leaders
The passing attacks generated modest production, making every significant reception especially valuable.
Denver Receiving Statistics
| Category | Total |
| Receptions | 16 |
| Receiving Yards | 150 |
| Average | 9.4 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Long Reception | 43 |
Top Receiver
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Long |
| Pat Bryant | 1 | 43 | 43 |
Pat Bryant’s lone catch covered 43 yards, becoming Denver’s longest offensive play of the night.
While his overall volume remained low, that explosive reception dramatically improved field position and highlighted how a single play can influence a defensive contest.
Las Vegas Receiving Statistics
| Category | Total |
| Receptions | 16 |
| Receiving Yards | 143 |
| Average | 8.9 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long Reception | 31 |
Top Receiver
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Long |
| Tyler Lockett | 5 | 44 | 19 |
Tyler Lockett provided Geno Smith with a dependable target throughout the evening. His five receptions accounted for the highest total on the Raiders, but Denver’s secondary prevented any touchdown opportunities.
The Broncos consistently tackled receivers shortly after the catch, limiting yards after reception and forcing Las Vegas to earn every first down.
Receiving Comparison
| Category | Broncos | Raiders |
| Receptions | 16 | 16 |
| Receiving Yards | 150 | 143 |
| Receiving TD | 1 | 0 |
| Long Reception | 43 | 31 |
The receiving statistics reflect how evenly matched the offenses were. Denver produced only seven more receiving yards, yet the lone touchdown reception became the deciding factor.
Defensive Performances That Decided the Game
If one unit deserves the most credit for Denver’s victory, it is unquestionably the defense.
The Broncos consistently pressured the quarterback, stopped the run, and created the game’s only turnover by interception against Geno Smith.
Denver Defensive Totals
| Category | Total |
| Total Tackles | 69 |
| Solo Tackles | 35 |
| Sacks | 6 |
| Tackles for Loss | 5 |
| Passes Defended | 3 |
| Quarterback Hits | 11 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
These numbers reveal complete defensive dominance.
Recording eleven quarterback hits alongside six sacks indicates that Geno Smith rarely had enough time to survey the field comfortably.
Talanoa Hufanga’s Outstanding Performance
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Tackles | 9 |
| Solo Tackles | 5 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 1 |
| QB Hits | 1 |
Talanoa Hufanga delivered one of the game’s most complete defensive performances.
His contributions extended beyond tackling. He disrupted running plays, pressured the quarterback, and consistently positioned himself around the football.
Watching the game, it became evident that his leadership helped organize Denver’s defensive unit throughout all four quarters.
Dondrea Tillman’s Crucial Interception
Turnovers frequently decide close contests.
Dondrea Tillman’s interception prevented Las Vegas from building offensive momentum and shifted possession back to Denver at a critical stage.
Although it did not result directly in a defensive touchdown, the takeaway proved invaluable in a game decided by only three points.
Raiders Defensive Performance
Despite the loss, Las Vegas’ defense produced an admirable effort.
Raiders Defensive Totals
| Category | Total |
| Total Tackles | 60 |
| Solo Tackles | 32 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for Loss | 4 |
| Passes Defended | 4 |
| Quarterback Hits | 4 |
Holding Denver to only ten points is normally enough to keep a team competitive.
Unfortunately for the Raiders, the offense could not capitalize on the opportunities their defense created.
Jeremy Chinn Led the Raiders
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Tackles | 9 |
| Solo Tackles | 2 |
Jeremy Chinn matched Denver’s defensive leaders in total tackles and remained active from the opening drive until the final whistle.
His tackling limited several potentially larger gains and prevented Denver from producing explosive offensive possessions.
Kyu Blu Kelly’s Two Interceptions
Perhaps the most impressive individual defensive statistic belonged to Kyu Blu Kelly.
| Statistic | Value |
| Interceptions | 2 |
| Return Yards | 26 |
Intercepting Bo Nix twice kept Las Vegas within one possession throughout the game.
Those turnovers gave the Raiders additional opportunities, but the offense was unable to convert them into points because of Denver’s relentless defensive pressure.
The denver broncos vs las vegas raiders match player stats clearly demonstrate that both defenses performed at a high level. The difference was that Denver’s defense consistently affected every phase of the game, from pass rushing to run stopping and creating timely turnovers.
Special Teams Performance
Close NFL games are often decided by special teams, and this matchup was no exception. Neither team produced a game-changing return touchdown, but field position, punting, and kicking all influenced the final result.
Denver Broncos Special Teams Stats
| Category | Player | Stats |
| Kicker | Wil Lutz | 1/2 FG, Long 32, 1/1 XP, 4 Points |
| Punter | Jeremy Crawshaw | 7 Punts, 293 Yards, 41.9 Avg, Long 54 |
| Kick Returns | RJ Harvey | 2 Returns, 35 Yards, 17.5 Avg |
| Punt Returns | Michael Bandy | 1 Return, -1 Yard |
Wil Lutz converted the field goal that ultimately proved to be the game winner. Although he missed one attempt, his successful kick supplied the winning margin in a defensive contest where every point carried enormous importance.
Jeremy Crawshaw consistently helped flip field position with seven punts, forcing Las Vegas to begin several possessions deep in its own territory.
Las Vegas Raiders Special Teams Stats
| Category | Player | Stats |
| Kicker | Daniel Carlson | 0/1 FG, 1/1 XP |
| Punter | AJ Cole | 7 Punts, 299 Yards, 42.7 Avg, 3 Inside 20 |
| Kick Returns | Dylan Laube | 1 Return, 28 Yards |
| Punt Returns | Alex Bachman | 3 Returns, 2 Yards |
Daniel Carlson’s missed field goal became one of the most significant moments of the game. In a matchup decided by only three points, every missed scoring opportunity proved costly.
AJ Cole once again demonstrated why he remains one of the league’s dependable punters. His ability to place three punts inside the 20-yard line repeatedly challenged Denver’s offense to drive the length of the field.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Turnovers frequently separate winning and losing teams, especially when points are difficult to score.
Denver Turnovers
| Category | Total |
| Interceptions Thrown | 2 |
| Lost Fumbles | 0 |
| Team Fumbles | 0 |
Although Bo Nix threw two interceptions, Denver deserves credit for protecting the football in every other situation.
Avoiding fumbles prevented the Raiders from receiving additional short-field opportunities.
Las Vegas Turnovers
| Category | Total |
| Interceptions Thrown | 1 |
| Team Fumbles | 2 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 |
The Raiders recovered both of their fumbles, preventing an even larger swing in momentum.
However, Geno Smith’s interception proved more damaging because Denver successfully protected its lead afterward.
Team Statistics Comparison
| Category | Broncos | Raiders |
| Final Score | 10 | 7 |
| Passing Yards | 150 | 143 |
| Rushing Yards | 84 | 74 |
| Total Receiving Yards | 150 | 143 |
| Passing TD | 1 | 0 |
| Rushing TD | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks Recorded | 6 | 2 |
| Interceptions Made | 1 | 2 |
| Total Tackles | 69 | 60 |
| QB Hits | 11 | 4 |
One statistic immediately stands out.
Denver generated six sacks and eleven quarterback hits while allowing only two sacks on its own offense. That difference in pass protection and pass rush largely explains why the Broncos secured the victory despite committing more interceptions.
Players Who Had the Biggest Impact
Bo Nix
Bo Nix’s stat line may not appear impressive at first glance, but context matters.
His touchdown pass represented the game’s only passing touchdown, and he remained composed after throwing two interceptions. Rather than forcing risky throws, he managed the offense efficiently during the second half.
J.K. Dobbins
Dobbins provided stability to Denver’s offense.
His 77 rushing yards kept the offense balanced and allowed the Broncos to control the tempo late in the game.
Talanoa Hufanga
Few defenders influenced the game as consistently as Talanoa Hufanga.
His nine tackles, sack, and overall defensive presence helped limit both the Raiders’ running game and passing attack.
Geno Smith
Smith faced relentless pressure throughout the contest.
Being sacked six times significantly limited his ability to establish rhythm, and the interception further reduced Las Vegas’ chances of mounting a comeback.
Ashton Jeanty
Jeanty accounted for the Raiders’ only touchdown and handled the majority of the rushing workload.
Despite facing a disciplined Denver defensive front, he competed hard and remained productive in short-yardage situations.
Kyu Blu Kelly
Kelly’s two interceptions deserve recognition among the game’s top individual performances.
Even though Las Vegas ultimately lost, his ball-hawking ability repeatedly gave the Raiders opportunities to regain momentum.
What the Statistics Reveal
Looking beyond the box score, several important themes emerge.
First, Denver’s defense consistently dictated the pace of the game. Pressure on the quarterback prevented Las Vegas from attempting deeper passes and disrupted nearly every offensive drive.
Second, the Broncos’ offense capitalized on its limited scoring opportunities. While the overall yardage was modest, Denver converted one passing touchdown and one field goal, which proved enough in a defensive struggle.
Third, Las Vegas demonstrated defensive resilience. Holding an 8–2 team to only ten points is an encouraging performance, but the offense simply could not generate enough sustained production.
Finally, this matchup illustrates why football games cannot be judged solely by offensive statistics. Defensive efficiency, field position, and situational execution frequently outweigh total yardage.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Denver Broncos vs Las Vegas Raiders game on November 7, 2025?
The Denver Broncos defeated the Las Vegas Raiders by a final score of 10–7, improving their record to 8–2.
Who led the game in passing yards?
Bo Nix led Denver with 150 passing yards and one touchdown, while Geno Smith finished with 143 passing yards and one interception for Las Vegas.
Which player recorded the most rushing yards?
J.K. Dobbins led all rushers with 77 yards on 18 carries, while Ashton Jeanty rushed for 60 yards and one touchdown.
Which defender had the biggest impact?
Talanoa Hufanga stood out for Denver with nine total tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit. Kyu Blu Kelly also made a significant impact for Las Vegas by recording two interceptions.
How many sacks did Denver record?
The Broncos finished with six sacks and eleven quarterback hits, making their pass rush one of the defining factors in the victory.
Why was this game so low scoring?
Both defenses consistently pressured opposing quarterbacks, limited explosive plays, and forced offenses to earn every yard. Strong defensive execution and conservative offensive strategies resulted in a 10–7 final score.
Conclusion
The denver broncos vs las vegas raiders match player stats reflect a game where defensive execution outweighed offensive firepower. Denver secured a 10–7 victory by capitalizing on limited scoring opportunities, maintaining composure under pressure, and delivering a dominant defensive performance when it mattered most.
Although Bo Nix finished with modest passing numbers and two interceptions, he threw the game’s only passing touchdown and effectively managed crucial possessions. J.K. Dobbins provided balance with a steady rushing performance, while Talanoa Hufanga anchored a defense that recorded six sacks and consistently disrupted the Raiders’ offense.
For Las Vegas, Ashton Jeanty supplied the team’s lone touchdown, Tyler Lockett served as the most reliable receiving target, and Kyu Blu Kelly produced one of the night’s standout individual performances with two interceptions. However, repeated pressure on Geno Smith and an inability to score after the opening quarter ultimately proved too much to overcome.
From an analytical perspective, this matchup serves as a reminder that football games are not always won through explosive offenses. Winning the battle at the line of scrimmage, protecting field position, creating pressure on the quarterback, and executing in key situations often have a greater influence on the final result than total offensive yardage alone.
Whether you are evaluating player performances, studying team trends, or comparing divisional rivals, this game provides valuable insight into how disciplined defense and efficient execution can determine the outcome of closely contested NFL matchups.
