The new york giants vs philadelphia eagles match player stats reveal far more than the final score. While the Philadelphia Eagles secured a convincing 38 to 20 victory over the New York Giants on October 26, 2025, the numbers tell the complete story of how the game unfolded. From Jalen Hurts’ efficient passing to Saquon Barkley’s explosive rushing performance, nearly every major statistic highlights why Philadelphia controlled the matchup for most of the afternoon.

Player statistics often explain details that a scoreboard cannot. Passing efficiency, rushing production, defensive pressure, tackling, and special teams all contributed to the outcome. Looking closely at these figures provides valuable insight into each team’s strengths, weaknesses, and overall execution.

This article provides a detailed breakdown of the game, analyzes every major performance, compares team statistics, and explains what each number means for both franchises moving forward. Whether you are an NFL fan, fantasy football enthusiast, or simply researching this matchup, this guide covers every important aspect of the contest using verified game statistics.

Match Overview

The rivalry between the New York Giants and the Philadelphia Eagles has produced memorable contests over the years, but this meeting belonged to Philadelphia. Playing at home, the Eagles combined explosive rushing, efficient passing, and timely defensive plays to improve their season record.

Match Summary

Category	Result
Date	October 26, 2025
Competition	NFL Regular Season
Winner	Philadelphia Eagles
Final Score	Philadelphia Eagles 38, New York Giants 20
Giants Record	2-6
Eagles Record	6-2

Philadelphia established momentum early and maintained control through all four quarters. Although New York managed several productive drives, they struggled to consistently stop the Eagles’ balanced offense.

Quarter by Quarter Game Breakdown

Understanding how the scoring progressed provides important context behind the player performances.

First Quarter

Score

• Giants: 7
• Eagles: 7

Both teams opened with confidence. The Giants answered Philadelphia’s early score, keeping the contest level after one quarter. At this stage, neither defense had fully settled into the game.

Second Quarter

Score

• Giants: 3
• Eagles: 14

The second quarter proved decisive.

Philadelphia increased offensive pressure through both the passing and rushing attack. Their defense also forced difficult situations for New York’s offense by generating consistent pressure on quarterback Jaxson Dart.

The Eagles entered halftime with a comfortable lead after outscoring New York by eleven points during the quarter.

Third Quarter

Score

• Giants: 3
• Eagles: 3

Defensive football dominated much of the third quarter.

Both teams managed only one scoring drive, and the Giants were unable to reduce Philadelphia’s advantage despite improving field position on several possessions.

Fourth Quarter

Score

• Giants: 7
• Eagles: 14

Philadelphia finished strongly.

Instead of protecting their lead conservatively, the Eagles continued attacking through both the air and on the ground. Their offensive balance prevented New York’s defense from focusing on a single threat.

New York Giants vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats Breakdown

The new york giants vs philadelphia eagles match player stats demonstrate that Philadelphia excelled in nearly every major statistical category.

Team Offensive Comparison

Category	Giants	Eagles
Passing Yards	193	179
Passing TD	1	4
Rushing Yards	68	276
Total Rushing Attempts	21	33
Yards Per Rush	3.2	8.4
Receiving Yards	193	179
Receiving TD	1	4

Although New York recorded slightly more passing yards, Philadelphia produced significantly more touchdowns while dominating on the ground.

The rushing attack created favorable passing situations for Jalen Hurts throughout the game.

Passing Performance Analysis

Jalen Hurts Delivers Elite Efficiency

Philadelphia quarterback Jalen Hurts delivered one of his most efficient performances of the season.

Passing Statistics

Statistic	Value
Completions	15
Attempts	20
Completion Rate	75%
Passing Yards	179
Touchdowns	4
Interceptions	0
Passer Rating	141.5
QBR	66.2

Although Hurts threw for fewer than 200 yards, his efficiency made the difference.

Four touchdown passes on only twenty attempts demonstrate exceptional decision-making. More importantly, he avoided turnovers while consistently finding receivers inside scoring territory.

Rather than forcing difficult throws, Hurts took advantage of favorable matchups created by Philadelphia’s powerful running game.

His 141.5 passer rating reflects one of the most productive outings possible without relying on extremely high passing volume.

Jaxson Dart Shows Promise Despite Pressure

New York quarterback Jaxson Dart experienced a much tougher afternoon.

Passing Statistics

Statistic	Value
Completions	14
Attempts	24
Passing Yards	193
Touchdowns	1
Interceptions	0
Passer Rating	98.1
QBR	59.4
Sacks Taken	5

On paper, Dart’s numbers appear respectable.

He avoided interceptions and completed several important passes, but Philadelphia’s pass rush prevented sustained offensive rhythm.

Taking five sacks repeatedly placed the Giants behind schedule and forced longer third-down situations.

Despite those challenges, Dart displayed composure by protecting the football throughout the game.

Rushing Battle Dominated by Philadelphia

If one statistical category explains the outcome better than any other, it is rushing.

Philadelphia completely overwhelmed New York on the ground.

Eagles Team Rushing

• 33 rushing attempts
• 276 rushing yards
• 8.4 yards per carry
• 1 rushing touchdown

A team averaging more than eight yards every rushing attempt places enormous pressure on opposing defenses.

The Eagles consistently generated explosive plays, reducing the need for long passing drives.

Their offensive line created running lanes throughout the afternoon, allowing backs to reach the second level before contact.

Giants Team Rushing

• 21 rushing attempts
• 68 rushing yards
• 3.2 yards per carry
• 1 touchdown

New York struggled to establish balance.

A rushing average of just over three yards per attempt forced the offense into predictable passing situations, allowing Philadelphia’s defensive front to attack aggressively.

Saquon Barkley Steals the Spotlight

No offensive player influenced the game more than Saquon Barkley.

Individual Rushing Stats

Statistic	Value
Carries	14
Rushing Yards	150
Touchdowns	1
Longest Run	65 Yards

Barkley averaged more than ten yards every time he carried the football.

His explosive 65-yard run changed field position instantly and highlighted Philadelphia’s ability to produce big plays without relying exclusively on the passing game.

Rather than needing thirty carries, Barkley maximized every opportunity.

His performance kept the Giants’ defense under constant pressure and opened additional passing opportunities for Hurts.

Tyrone Tracy Jr. Leads New York

The Giants’ leading rusher was Tyrone Tracy Jr.

Individual Statistics

Statistic	Value
Carries	10
Yards	39
Touchdowns	0

Tracy worked hard between the tackles but found little running room.

Philadelphia’s defensive front consistently limited gains on early downs, preventing New York from developing offensive momentum.

Offensive Balance Made the Difference

One of the clearest lessons from this matchup is that offensive balance remains one of the strongest indicators of success in the NFL.

Philadelphia never became predictable.

Because Barkley consistently gained significant yardage on the ground, New York’s linebackers and safeties were forced closer to the line of scrimmage. That created favorable passing windows for Hurts, who capitalized with four touchdown throws despite attempting only twenty passes.

The Giants, by contrast, struggled to maintain that same balance. Limited rushing production placed additional responsibility on Jaxson Dart, allowing Philadelphia’s pass rush to become increasingly aggressive as the game progressed.

The contrast between the two offenses illustrates why total yardage alone does not determine a game’s outcome. Efficiency, explosive plays, and situational execution often matter far more than raw numbers.

Receiving Performance Analysis

The receiving numbers from the new york giants vs philadelphia eagles match player stats show an interesting contrast. New York and Philadelphia produced similar total receiving yardage, but the difference came from efficiency and scoring impact.

Philadelphia’s receivers converted opportunities into touchdowns, while the Giants struggled to create enough consistent scoring plays.

DeVonta Smith Leads Eagles Receiving Attack

Philadelphia wide receiver DeVonta Smith was the team’s top receiving performer.

Receiving Statistics

Statistic	Value
Receptions	6
Receiving Yards	84
Touchdowns	0

Smith played an important role in keeping Philadelphia’s passing offense efficient.

Although he did not record a touchdown, his six receptions provided reliable production and helped extend drives. His ability to create separation gave Jalen Hurts a dependable option when New York attempted to limit explosive plays.

Smith’s performance represents an important part of Philadelphia’s offensive structure. Not every productive receiver needs to score touchdowns. Consistent first-down conversions and reliable catches often create the foundation for successful drives.

Wan’Dale Robinson Provides Giants’ Best Receiving Output

For New York, wide receiver Wan’Dale Robinson led the receiving group.

Receiving Statistics

Statistic	Value
Receptions	3
Receiving Yards	48

Robinson was the Giants’ most productive receiver, but the limited reception total shows the offensive challenges New York faced.

The Giants finished with only 14 completed passes, meaning their receiving group had fewer opportunities compared with Philadelphia’s attack.

The issue was not only individual receiver performance. Philadelphia’s defensive pressure and strong run defense prevented New York from creating consistent offensive rhythm.

Touchdown Efficiency Separates the Two Teams

One of the biggest differences in the game was touchdown conversion.

Philadelphia Eagles

• Passing touchdowns: 4
• Rushing touchdowns: 1

New York Giants

• Passing touchdowns: 1
• Rushing touchdowns: 1

Philadelphia scored more efficiently despite having only slightly fewer passing yards.

This highlights an important football principle: moving the ball between the 20-yard lines is not enough. Successful teams must finish drives with touchdowns.

The Eagles repeatedly turned opportunities into points, while the Giants often settled for smaller gains and field goals.

Defensive Performance Breakdown

Defense played a major role in determining the final result.

The new york giants vs philadelphia eagles match player stats show that both teams generated pressure, but Philadelphia created more disruptive plays at critical moments.

Eagles Defense Controls the Line of Scrimmage

Philadelphia Defensive Statistics

Category	Total
Total Tackles	49
Solo Tackles	35
Sacks	5
Tackles For Loss	7
Pass Deflections	4
Quarterback Hits	6

The Eagles defense consistently affected the quarterback.

Five sacks and six quarterback hits created constant pressure on Jaxson Dart. Even when New York completed passes, the offense struggled to maintain long drives because negative plays repeatedly interrupted momentum.

Philadelphia’s defensive front was especially effective on passing downs. By forcing longer third downs, the Eagles increased their chances of creating pressure situations.

Zack Baun Leads Eagles Tackling

Individual Defensive Performance

Player	Team	Total Tackles
Zack Baun	Philadelphia Eagles	6

Baun provided strong defensive support throughout the matchup.

His tackling ability helped limit additional yards after contact and prevented several Giants plays from becoming bigger gains.

Linebacker production is often overlooked because it does not always appear on highlight reels, but consistent tackling is one of the foundations of defensive success.

Giants Defense Records More Tackles But Faces More Pressure

New York Defensive Statistics

Category	Total
Total Tackles	61
Solo Tackles	33
Sacks	4
Tackles For Loss	3
Pass Deflections	4
Quarterback Hits	5

The Giants recorded more total tackles because Philadelphia controlled possession and produced more successful plays.

Higher tackle numbers do not always mean a defense played better. Sometimes they indicate that the defense spent more time reacting.

New York generated four sacks and showed moments of defensive improvement, but stopping explosive plays remained a major challenge.

Bobby Okereke Leads Giants Defense

Individual Defensive Performance

Player	Team	Total Tackles
Bobby Okereke	New York Giants	8

Okereke was active throughout the game and led the Giants in tackles.

His eight tackles demonstrate his involvement in stopping Philadelphia’s offense, but the overall defensive numbers show how difficult it was to contain Barkley and the Eagles rushing attack.

Pass Rush Impact on the Game

The quarterback pressure statistics explain why Philadelphia controlled the matchup.

Sack Comparison

Team	Sacks
Giants	4
Eagles	5

Both teams created pressure, but Philadelphia’s additional sack production came at important moments.

The Eagles did not need to blitz constantly because their defensive line generated pressure naturally. This allowed defensive backs to maintain coverage and reduce easy passing opportunities.

For New York, the challenge was different. Even with four sacks, they struggled to slow down Philadelphia’s overall offensive efficiency.

Turnovers and Ball Security

Turnovers often decide close NFL games, but this matchup was different.

Neither team committed a turnover.

Turnover Summary

Category	Giants	Eagles
Fumbles Lost	0	0
Interceptions Thrown	0	0

Both quarterbacks protected the football.

Jalen Hurts showed excellent decision-making by avoiding risky throws, while Jaxson Dart maintained control despite heavy pressure.

Because turnovers were not a factor, the game was decided mainly by:

• Rushing dominance
• Touchdown efficiency
• Offensive execution
• Defensive pressure

Special Teams Performance

Special teams contributed smaller moments that influenced field position.

Kicking Comparison

Graham Gano, New York Giants

Category	Result
Field Goals	2/2
Long Field Goal	47 yards
Extra Points	2/2
Total Points	8

Gano delivered a perfect kicking performance for New York.

His reliability helped the Giants convert scoring opportunities, although touchdowns were ultimately needed to match Philadelphia’s production.

Jake Elliott, Philadelphia Eagles

Category	Result
Field Goals	1/2
Long Field Goal	40 yards
Extra Points	5/5
Total Points	8

Elliott missed one field goal attempt but remained perfect on extra points.

Philadelphia’s ability to score touchdowns reduced the impact of the missed field goal.

Return Game Comparison

Kick Returns

Team	Returns	Yards	Average
Giants	5	145	29.0
Eagles	3	99	33.0

The Giants generated more total kick return yards because they had more opportunities.

Philadelphia produced better average return yardage, showing stronger efficiency on each return.

Punt Returns

Giants

The Giants recorded no punt returns.

Eagles

Player	Returns	Yards
Xavier Gipson	1	17

Philadelphia gained additional field position through their return game.

Punting Performance

Jamie Gillan, Giants

Category	Value
Punts	4
Total Yards	194
Average	48.5
Long	58

Gillan produced strong distance numbers and helped New York with field position.

Braden Mann, Eagles

Category	Value
Punts	1
Total Yards	57
Average	57.0

Because Philadelphia’s offense consistently moved the ball, they needed fewer punts during the game.

Key Statistical Lessons From the Match

The final score of 38 to 20 was created by several important statistical advantages.

1. Rushing Efficiency Was the Biggest Difference

The largest gap came on the ground.

Philadelphia:

• 276 rushing yards
• 8.4 yards per carry

New York:

• 68 rushing yards
• 3.2 yards per carry

This difference allowed Philadelphia to control tempo and create better offensive situations.

2. Touchdown Production Mattered More Than Yardage

New York actually produced 193 passing yards, slightly higher than Philadelphia’s 179.

However, Philadelphia converted passing opportunities into four touchdowns.

The ability to finish drives separated the teams.

3. Defensive Pressure Changed Offensive Decisions

Both teams recorded multiple sacks, but Philadelphia’s defense consistently placed New York in uncomfortable situations.

Five sacks and six quarterback hits reduced explosive passing opportunities and forced the Giants into difficult third downs.

Team Comparison and Complete Statistical Analysis

The new york giants vs philadelphia eagles match player stats provide a clear picture of why Philadelphia controlled the game from start to finish. While both teams showed individual moments of quality, the overall performance gap appeared in the areas that usually decide NFL games: explosive plays, rushing efficiency, touchdown production, and defensive pressure.

Statistics are most valuable when they explain the reason behind a result. In this matchup, the numbers show that Philadelphia did not simply win because of one outstanding player. The Eagles created advantages across multiple areas, making it difficult for the Giants to recover once the score gap increased.

Complete Team Statistical Comparison

Category	New York Giants	Philadelphia Eagles
Final Score	20	38
Passing Yards	193	179
Passing Touchdowns	1	4
Interceptions	0	0
Rushing Attempts	21	33
Rushing Yards	68	276
Rushing Average	3.2	8.4
Rushing Touchdowns	1	1
Total Receiving Yards	193	179
Total Tackles	61	49
Sacks	4	5
Quarterback Hits	5	6
Fumbles Lost	0	0

The biggest statistical separation appears in rushing performance.

Philadelphia gained 208 more rushing yards than New York, creating a significant advantage in time of possession, field position, and offensive flexibility.

Why Philadelphia Eagles Won the Match

1. Dominant Ground Attack

The Eagles’ rushing performance was the foundation of their victory.

A team rushing average of 8.4 yards per carry is extremely difficult for any defense to handle. Philadelphia repeatedly created explosive gains, forcing New York defenders to adjust throughout the game.

Saquon Barkley’s 65-yard run was one of the biggest moments of the contest. Plays like this change defensive strategy because opponents can no longer focus only on short-yardage situations.

When a running back can produce explosive plays, the entire offense becomes more dangerous.

2. Jalen Hurts Maximized Every Opportunity

Jalen Hurts did not need a high passing volume because Philadelphia’s running game created favorable situations.

His performance showed strong efficiency:

• 15 completions on 20 attempts
• 179 passing yards
• 4 touchdown passes
• 0 interceptions
• 141.5 passer rating

The most impressive aspect was his ability to finish drives.

Many quarterbacks can move the ball between the 20-yard lines, but elite performances are defined by scoring efficiency. Hurts consistently found the end zone when Philadelphia reached scoring territory.

3. Giants Could Not Establish Offensive Balance

New York’s biggest challenge was maintaining offensive balance.

Their rushing attack produced:

• 68 total rushing yards
• 3.2 yards per attempt

Because the Giants struggled to run effectively, Philadelphia could increase pressure on Jaxson Dart.

The Eagles defense did not have to respect explosive rushing plays, allowing defenders to focus more aggressively on passing situations.

Individual Players Who Changed the Game

Saquon Barkley

Barkley’s performance was the most explosive individual effort.

Stats

• 14 carries
• 150 rushing yards
• 1 touchdown
• 65-yard long run

His impact was not only measured by total yards. His explosive runs changed field position and forced New York’s defense to defend every area of the field.

Jalen Hurts

Hurts delivered the most efficient passing performance.

Stats

• 15 of 20 passing
• 179 yards
• 4 touchdowns
• 0 interceptions
• 141.5 rating

His ability to avoid mistakes while producing touchdowns was a major reason Philadelphia built a comfortable lead.

DeVonta Smith

Smith provided consistent receiving production.

Stats

• 6 receptions
• 84 yards

His reliability helped maintain offensive rhythm and gave Hurts a dependable passing option.

Bobby Okereke

Okereke led the Giants defense.

Stats

• 8 total tackles

Although New York struggled overall, Okereke remained active and consistently involved in defensive plays.

Advanced View of Offensive Efficiency

Traditional statistics like total yards are useful, but they do not always explain winning football.

Philadelphia demonstrated several efficiency advantages.

Red Zone Performance

The Eagles were significantly better at converting opportunities into touchdowns.

Their four passing touchdowns showed excellent execution near the scoring area.

New York moved the ball at times but could not match Philadelphia’s ability to finish drives.

Explosive Plays

Explosive plays often determine NFL outcomes.

Philadelphia benefited from:

• Saquon Barkley’s 65-yard run
• Multiple successful passing plays
• Strong yards-per-carry production

New York lacked similar game-changing plays, making it difficult to overcome Philadelphia’s lead.

Turnover-Free Football

Both teams avoided costly mistakes.

Neither quarterback threw an interception, and neither team lost a fumble.

This means the final result was not caused by careless mistakes. Philadelphia won because they executed better in fundamental areas.

What the Match Reveals About Both Teams

Philadelphia Eagles Outlook

The Eagles displayed the profile of a complete team.

Their strengths included:

• Efficient quarterback play
• Elite rushing production
• Strong defensive pressure
• Balanced offensive approach

A team that can run the football effectively while producing efficient passing numbers becomes difficult to defend.

The Eagles also showed discipline by avoiding turnovers and maintaining offensive consistency.

New York Giants Outlook

The Giants showed some positive signs, particularly from Jaxson Dart’s ability to avoid interceptions under pressure.

However, several areas require improvement:

Running Game Improvement

The biggest concern was rushing efficiency.

Producing only 68 rushing yards made the offense predictable.

Pass Protection

Allowing five sacks created problems for the quarterback.

Improving offensive line protection would give the passing game more opportunities.

Finishing Drives

The Giants need better red-zone execution.

Scoring touchdowns instead of settling for limited points is essential against high-quality opponents.

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the key player stats in the Giants vs Eagles game?

The most important performances came from Jalen Hurts, Saquon Barkley, and DeVonta Smith for Philadelphia. Hurts threw four touchdown passes, Barkley rushed for 150 yards with a 65-yard run, and Smith recorded 84 receiving yards. For New York, Jaxson Dart passed for 193 yards and Wan’Dale Robinson led receivers with 48 yards.

Who was the best player in the Giants vs Eagles matchup?

Saquon Barkley was the most impactful player because his 150 rushing yards and explosive 65-yard run changed the game. Jalen Hurts also delivered an outstanding performance with four touchdown passes and a 141.5 passer rating.

How many rushing yards did the Eagles have against the Giants?

The Philadelphia Eagles recorded 276 rushing yards on 33 attempts, averaging 8.4 yards per carry. This was one of the biggest differences between the two teams.

Did Jaxson Dart throw any interceptions against Philadelphia?

No. Jaxson Dart completed 14 of 24 passes for 193 yards and one touchdown without throwing an interception. However, he was pressured heavily and was sacked five times.

Which team had better defensive statistics?

Both defenses produced pressure, but Philadelphia had the stronger overall defensive impact. The Eagles recorded five sacks, seven tackles for loss, and six quarterback hits, limiting New York’s offensive consistency.

Conclusion

The New York Giants vs Philadelphia Eagles matchup showed how efficiency and execution determine NFL success. Philadelphia’s victory was built on a powerful rushing attack, accurate quarterback play, strong defensive pressure, and excellent touchdown conversion.

The statistics highlight a clear difference between the teams. The Eagles created explosive plays, protected the football, and controlled the game through balance. Saquon Barkley’s rushing dominance and Jalen Hurts’ passing efficiency combined to produce one of Philadelphia’s strongest offensive performances.

The Giants showed competitive effort and avoided major mistakes, but their inability to establish a reliable running game and protect the quarterback made it difficult to challenge Philadelphia consistently.

The final score reflected the complete statistical picture: Philadelphia executed at a higher level in the areas that matter most.