Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats

The los angeles rams vs cleveland browns match player stats provide a detailed look at how two NFL teams performed during their preseason meeting on August 23, 2025. The Cleveland Browns secured a narrow 19-17 victory over the Los Angeles Rams in an evenly contested matchup where quarterback efficiency, defensive pressure, and situational execution decided the outcome.

Unlike regular-season games where established starters often dominate the statistics, preseason contests offer a different type of evaluation. Coaches use these games to measure depth players, young prospects, backup quarterbacks, and position battles. Looking beyond the final score reveals important details about player development, offensive rhythm, defensive consistency, and roster decisions.

From analyzing NFL box scores and individual performances, one thing becomes clear: this matchup was not decided by one dominant player. Instead, the Browns created enough offensive balance and defensive pressure to overcome a strong rushing effort from the Rams. Cleveland’s ability to generate explosive moments through its passing game helped secure the win, while Los Angeles showed encouraging signs from several young contributors.

This detailed breakdown examines the passing, rushing, receiving, defensive, and special teams performances that shaped the game while providing context behind the numbers.

Table of Contents

Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Browns Match Player Stats Overview

Match Summary and Final Score Breakdown

The Cleveland Browns defeated the Los Angeles Rams 19-17 on August 23, 2025, in an NFL preseason matchup.

The game featured competitive play throughout four quarters, with both teams showing strengths in different areas.

Team	Final Score	Record After Game
Cleveland Browns	19	3-0
Los Angeles Rams	17	2-1

The quarter-by-quarter scoring showed how momentum shifted during the game:

Quarter	Los Angeles Rams	Cleveland Browns
First Quarter	0	7
Second Quarter	7	9
Third Quarter	3	0
Fourth Quarter	7	3
Total	17	19

Cleveland started faster by scoring seven points in the opening quarter. The Browns maintained control in the second quarter with nine additional points, creating a 16-7 halftime advantage.

The Rams responded after halftime, scoring in both the third and fourth quarters, but Cleveland’s defense and late-game execution prevented Los Angeles from completing the comeback.

What the Statistics Reveal

The numbers show a closely matched contest:

Cleveland produced 171 passing yards compared to Los Angeles‘ 190 passing yards.
The Rams gained more rushing yards with 99 yards on 28 attempts.
The Browns recorded 221 receiving yards, creating more passing efficiency.
Both teams protected the football well, with neither team losing a fumble or throwing an interception.
Defensive pressure was a major factor, with both teams combining for 10 sacks.

The biggest statistical difference came through the passing efficiency of Cleveland’s quarterback group and the ability of Browns receivers to consistently create yardage after catches.

Team Offensive Performance Analysis

Los Angeles Rams Offensive Breakdown

The Rams finished the game with 190 passing yards, 99 rushing yards, and one offensive touchdown.

Their offensive production showed a balanced approach, especially through the running game. Los Angeles attempted 28 rushing plays, which helped control possession and reduce pressure on the passing attack.

The Rams’ offensive totals:

Category	Rams Total
Passing	15/23, 190 yards
Passing Touchdowns	1
Interceptions	0
Sacks Allowed	4
Rushing Attempts	28
Rushing Yards	99
Rushing Touchdowns	1
Receiving Yards	190
Receiving Touchdowns	1

The Rams’ offense showed positive signs in ball security. The team avoided turnovers through the passing game and did not lose either of its two fumbles.

However, four sacks allowed highlighted an area that required improvement. Quarterback protection and offensive line consistency remained important evaluation points during preseason play.

Quarterback Performance: Dresser Winn Leads Rams Attack

Dresser Winn handled the majority of quarterback responsibilities for Los Angeles and delivered a productive performance.

His final statistics:

15 completions on 23 attempts
190 passing yards
1 touchdown
0 interceptions
105.3 passer rating

Winn displayed strong accuracy and efficiency, completing nearly 65% of his throws. His ability to avoid turnovers helped keep the Rams competitive throughout the game.

The most encouraging part of his performance was his decision-making. In preseason games, backup quarterbacks are often evaluated heavily on their ability to make safe decisions under pressure. Winn showed control by avoiding risky throws and maintaining offensive flow.

The four sacks allowed against the Rams were not entirely a quarterback issue, but they reflected the challenge of operating behind a developing offensive unit. Pocket awareness, timing, and quick decision-making become even more important when protection breaks down.

Rams Rushing Attack Provides Stability

The Rams gained 99 rushing yards on 28 attempts, averaging approximately 3.5 yards per carry.

The leading rusher was Jordan Waters, who delivered one of the team’s strongest offensive performances.

His rushing statistics:

6 carries
42 rushing yards
1 touchdown

Waters averaged seven yards per carry, providing an explosive element to the Rams rushing attack. His touchdown run helped Los Angeles close the scoring gap and demonstrated his ability to create plays in limited opportunities.

The Rams’ rushing performance showed that their depth players could contribute effectively when given opportunities. While the overall average was modest, the ability to establish the run helped balance the offense.

Receiving Production: Brennan Presley and Drake Stoops Stand Out

Los Angeles recorded 15 receptions for 190 receiving yards and one touchdown.

Brennan Presley led the team in receiving production:

3 receptions
51 yards

Presley demonstrated the ability to gain separation and create meaningful yardage. His performance was especially valuable in a preseason environment where young receivers compete for roster positions.

Drake Stoops contributed the Rams’ only receiving touchdown of the game. His scoring play represented an important moment because preseason opportunities often determine which players earn extended roles.

The Rams receiving group showed potential, but consistency in creating sustained drives remained a challenge.

Cleveland Browns Offensive Breakdown

The Browns offense produced 171 passing yards and 85 rushing yards while scoring 19 points.

Although Cleveland recorded fewer passing yards than Los Angeles, the team created more scoring opportunities through efficient quarterback rotation and reliable receiving production.

Cleveland offensive totals:

Category	Browns Total
Passing	25/36, 171 yards
Passing Touchdowns	2
Interceptions	0
Sacks Allowed	6
Rushing Attempts	22
Rushing Yards	85
Rushing Touchdowns	0
Receiving Yards	221
Receiving Touchdowns	2

The Browns moved the ball effectively through short and intermediate passing concepts. Their quarterback group combined for two touchdown passes, helping the team maintain the lead.

However, the offensive line allowed six sacks, which was one of the clearest areas needing attention. Even though Cleveland won, protection issues created unnecessary pressure situations.

Quarterback Rotation Helps Cleveland Secure Victory

The Browns used multiple quarterbacks during the matchup:

Dillon Gabriel

12 completions on 19 attempts
129 passing yards
1 touchdown
0 interceptions

Joe Flacco

9 completions on 10 attempts
71 passing yards
1 touchdown

Shedeur Sanders

3 completions on 6 attempts
14 passing yards

Tyler Huntley

1 completion on 1 attempt
7 passing yards

Dillon Gabriel produced the highest passing yardage for Cleveland and demonstrated efficiency throughout his appearances. Joe Flacco also contributed with a touchdown pass and veteran accuracy.

The combined quarterback performance helped Cleveland maintain offensive balance and avoid costly mistakes.

Cleveland Browns Receiving Analysis and Playmaking Impact

The receiving numbers are one of the most interesting parts of the los angeles rams vs cleveland browns match player stats because Cleveland created more production through the passing game despite recording fewer total passing yards than Los Angeles.

The Browns finished with:

25 receptions
221 receiving yards
2 receiving touchdowns

Their ability to consistently complete passes helped them maintain drives and create scoring opportunities. While the Rams had a strong individual receiving performance from Brennan Presley, Cleveland received contributions from multiple players.

Jamari Thrash Provides Reliable Receiving Production

Jamari Thrash led the Browns receiving group with:

3 receptions
42 receiving yards

Thrash’s performance showed his ability to contribute as a dependable target. In preseason games, receivers are evaluated not only by total yardage but also by route precision, separation ability, and consistency.

A receiver who can repeatedly create manageable third-down situations becomes valuable because coaches need players who can execute assignments within the offensive system.

Thrash’s performance demonstrated that Cleveland had depth options capable of producing when given opportunities.

Touchdown Contributions From Gage Larvadain and Harold Fannin Jr.

The Browns recorded two receiving touchdowns, with:

Gage Larvadain scoring one touchdown
Harold Fannin Jr. scoring one touchdown

These plays were important because preseason scoring opportunities often reveal which young players can translate practice performances into game situations.

Touchdown production is not the only evaluation factor, but players who consistently find ways to finish drives often separate themselves during roster competition.

Harold Fannin Jr.’s touchdown was particularly notable because tight ends are frequently evaluated on their ability to contribute in both passing and blocking situations.

Comparing Rams and Browns Receiving Units

When comparing the two teams, Cleveland had the advantage in total receiving production.

Category	Rams	Browns
Receptions	15	25
Receiving Yards	190	221
Receiving Touchdowns	1	2

The difference was not simply about explosive plays. Cleveland created more consistent completion volume, while Los Angeles relied more heavily on fewer players producing larger gains.

This contrast reflects two different offensive approaches:

Rams approach:

Fewer receptions
More yardage per catch
Strong individual contributions

Browns approach:

More completed passes
More balanced target distribution
Better scoring efficiency

Both styles can succeed, but Cleveland’s method produced more points in this matchup.

Defensive Performance Breakdown

Rams Defense Creates Pressure Despite Loss

The Los Angeles defense delivered several positive signs despite allowing 19 points.

Team defensive statistics:

72 total tackles
6 sacks
8 tackles for loss
3 pass deflections
4 quarterback hits

The strongest area of the Rams defense was pressure generation. Six sacks showed that the defensive front was able to disrupt Cleveland’s passing rhythm.

Creating consistent pressure is one of the most valuable defensive indicators because it affects quarterback timing, offensive decision-making, and play development.

The Rams also recorded eight tackles for loss, demonstrating effectiveness against negative plays. Limiting rushing efficiency and forcing longer down-and-distance situations helped keep the game competitive.

Pressure Without Turnovers Remains a Challenge

Although the Rams generated pressure, they did not create a turnover.

Their defensive statistics included:

0 interceptions
0 forced turnovers recovered

This became an important difference in a close 19-17 game.

Modern NFL defenses often rely on creating short fields through turnovers. While pressure can change games, combining sacks with takeaways creates even greater defensive impact.

The Rams showed the ability to disrupt plays but will look for more impact moments when facing regular-season competition.

Browns Defense Controls Key Moments

Cleveland’s defense recorded:

67 total tackles
4 sacks
7 tackles for loss
4 pass deflections
10 quarterback hits

The Browns did not produce as many sacks as Los Angeles, but they created more quarterback disruption through total pressure.

Their 10 quarterback hits showed consistent defensive activity throughout the game.

One of the biggest defensive achievements was preventing explosive scoring runs after halftime. The Rams scored 10 points in the second half, but Cleveland managed enough stops to protect its narrow lead.

Defensive Comparison Between Both Teams

Defensive Category	Rams	Browns
Total Tackles	72	67
Sacks	6	4
Tackles For Loss	8	7
Pass Deflections	3	4
Quarterback Hits	4	10
Interceptions	0	0

The numbers reveal two different defensive identities.

The Rams were stronger at finishing plays behind the line of scrimmage, while the Browns created more overall quarterback disruption.

For coaches evaluating players, both types of production matter. A defense needs players who can create negative plays while also maintaining coverage discipline.

Special Teams Performance Analysis

Special teams played an important role in a game decided by only two points.

Rams Special Teams Statistics

The Rams special teams numbers included:

Kicking:

Joshua Karty
1/1 field goals
Long field goal: 45 yards
2/2 extra points
Total points: 5

Punting:

Ethan Evans
7 punts
365 total yards
52.1-yard average
Long punt: 58 yards

Kick Returns:

2 returns
36 yards
18.0 average

Punt Returns:

2 returns
14 yards

Joshua Karty provided reliable kicking production, including a long 45-yard field goal.

Ethan Evans also delivered strong field position value with an impressive punting average. In competitive NFL games, field position often determines hidden advantages, and punting efficiency can limit opponent scoring chances.

Browns Special Teams Statistics

The Browns special teams performance included:

Kicking:

Dustin Hopkins
1/1 field goals
Long field goal: 28 yards
1/2 extra points
Andre Szmyt
1/1 field goals
Long field goal: 37 yards

Punting:

Corey Bojorquez
7 punts
359 total yards
51.3-yard average
Long punt: 67 yards

Kick Returns:

1 return
10 yards

Punt Returns:

6 returns
62 yards

The Browns gained a significant advantage in punt return production. Their 62 punt return yards created better field position and helped support their offensive opportunities.

Corey Bojorquez’s 67-yard punt was another important special teams highlight because flipping field position can directly influence scoring chances.

Key Factors That Decided the Game

Cleveland’s Passing Efficiency

The Browns won despite recording fewer passing yards because they converted more opportunities into scoring plays.

Their quarterback group combined for:

25 completions
171 yards
2 touchdowns
0 interceptions

Efficient passing helped Cleveland maintain control.

Rams Running Game Kept Them Competitive

Los Angeles had the stronger rushing performance.

The Rams produced:

28 rushing attempts
99 rushing yards
1 rushing touchdown

Jordan Waters’ 42-yard rushing performance gave the Rams an important offensive spark.

Turnover-Free Football

Both teams avoided major mistakes.

Neither team recorded:

An interception
A lost fumble

In a two-point game, protecting the football prevented either side from gaining a major advantage.

Defensive Pressure Battle

The combined defensive pressure was significant:

Rams: 6 sacks
Browns: 4 sacks

Both defensive units successfully pressured quarterbacks, making pocket management and quick decisions critical throughout the matchup.

Player Evaluations and Deeper Statistical Insights

The los angeles rams vs cleveland browns match player stats tell a bigger story than the final 19-17 score. Preseason games are often judged by development, consistency, and individual progress rather than only wins and losses.

This matchup provided useful evaluation points for both teams. Several players improved their preseason cases by showing efficiency, discipline, and the ability to perform under game conditions.

Rams Player Performances That Stood Out

Dresser Winn Shows Accuracy and Decision-Making

Dresser Winn was one of the most consistent performers for Los Angeles.

His statistics:

15 completions
23 attempts
190 passing yards
1 touchdown
0 interceptions
105.3 passer rating

The most valuable part of Winn’s performance was his ability to protect possession. Quarterbacks competing for roster opportunities are often evaluated on whether they can make correct decisions when plays break down.

Winn demonstrated several positive traits:

Accurate short and intermediate passing
Strong awareness in the pocket
Ability to avoid risky throws
Efficient scoring production

Although the Rams allowed four sacks, Winn’s passing numbers remained productive. The performance suggested that he could operate effectively when given protection and consistent offensive support.

Jordan Waters Provides Explosive Running Ability

Jordan Waters delivered one of the most impactful Rams offensive performances.

His numbers:

6 carries
42 rushing yards
1 rushing touchdown

His seven-yard rushing average was the best among the team’s primary rushing contributors.

Waters showed:

Burst through running lanes
Ability to create additional yardage
Strong finishing ability near the goal line

Running backs often face intense competition during preseason because teams evaluate multiple players for limited roster positions. A performance featuring efficiency and a touchdown naturally attracts coaching attention.

Brennan Presley Creates Receiving Opportunities

Brennan Presley led Rams receivers with:

3 receptions
51 receiving yards

His production showed the importance of creating separation and maximizing limited targets.

In preseason football, a receiver may not receive a large number of opportunities, so efficiency becomes critical. Presley converted his chances into meaningful yardage and demonstrated potential value as a reliable offensive option.

Browns Player Performances That Stood Out

Dillon Gabriel Leads Cleveland Passing Production

Dillon Gabriel produced the highest passing yardage among Browns quarterbacks.

His statistics:

12 completions
19 attempts
129 passing yards
1 touchdown
0 interceptions

Gabriel showed effective command of the offense and maintained accuracy throughout his appearances.

Important areas from his performance included:

Efficient completion percentage
Strong touchdown production
Safe decision-making
Ability to move the offense consistently

A quarterback’s preseason evaluation involves more than statistics. Coaches also examine communication, timing, preparation, and response to defensive pressure. Gabriel’s performance provided several encouraging signs.

Joe Flacco Adds Veteran Stability

Joe Flacco contributed:

9 completions
10 attempts
71 passing yards
1 touchdown

His 90% completion rate demonstrated efficient execution.

Veteran quarterbacks often bring value through:

Quick decision-making
Defensive recognition
Offensive leadership

Flacco’s performance helped Cleveland maintain offensive rhythm during his playing time.

Jamari Thrash Provides Receiving Consistency

Jamari Thrash finished as Cleveland’s leading receiver:

3 receptions
42 yards

His contribution represented the importance of dependable targets. Receivers who consistently complete assignments and gain positive yardage help quarterbacks maintain confidence and offensive rhythm.

Harold Fannin Jr. and Gage Larvadain Deliver Scoring Plays

The Browns received touchdown contributions from:

Harold Fannin Jr.
Gage Larvadain

Scoring plays from young offensive players are valuable during preseason evaluation because they demonstrate the ability to finish drives.

The Browns’ receiving group produced more total yardage than the Rams:

Browns: 221 receiving yards
Rams: 190 receiving yards

That production difference played a major role in the final result.

Statistical Lessons From the Match

Passing Efficiency Was More Important Than Total Yardage

One of the biggest lessons from the game was that passing volume does not always determine success.

The Rams recorded more passing yards:

Rams: 190 yards
Browns: 171 yards

However, Cleveland scored more passing touchdowns:

Browns: 2 touchdowns
Rams: 1 touchdown

The Browns converted their passing opportunities into points more effectively.

This is an important football evaluation principle. Yardage numbers provide context, but efficiency, scoring production, and avoiding turnovers often determine outcomes.

Cleveland’s Reception Volume Created Offensive Stability

The Browns completed more passes:

Browns: 25 receptions
Rams: 15 receptions

This difference helped Cleveland maintain possession and create consistent offensive movement.

A high completion total does not automatically guarantee victory, but it often reflects effective execution in short and intermediate areas.

Rams Defensive Pressure Was Encouraging

The Rams recorded:

6 sacks
8 tackles for loss

Their defensive front showed the ability to disrupt offensive plays.

However, pressure must eventually translate into game-changing results. Without turnovers or defensive touchdowns, the Rams needed their offense to produce more points.

Browns Special Teams Created Hidden Advantages

The Browns gained valuable field position through punt returns.

Their punt return production:

6 returns
62 yards

Field position is often overlooked when analyzing box scores, but it influences offensive starting points and scoring opportunities.

In a two-point victory, these small advantages can become decisive.

Real-World Application: How Fans Should Analyze Preseason Player Stats

Many fans look only at final scores, but preseason evaluation requires a different approach.

A better analysis method includes:

1. Evaluate Efficiency

Instead of focusing only on total yards, examine:

Completion percentage
Yards per attempt
Touchdown production
Turnovers

A quarterback completing fewer passes may still perform better if those throws create more valuable outcomes.

2. Consider Playing Opportunities

Player statistics depend heavily on:

Number of snaps
Quality of opposing players
Offensive scheme
Position responsibilities

A player with limited opportunities may still show strong potential through efficient performance.

3. Analyze Position-Specific Success

Different positions require different evaluation methods.

For example:

Quarterbacks:

Decision-making
Accuracy
Pressure response

Running backs:

Vision
Explosive plays
Ball security

Receivers:

Separation
Route execution
Catch reliability

Defenders:

Tackling
Pressure creation
Coverage discipline

4. Look Beyond the Box Score

Traditional statistics do not capture everything.

Coaches also evaluate:

Communication
Assignment discipline
Football intelligence
Technique consistency

This is why preseason analysis requires more context than simply comparing numbers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score of the Los Angeles Rams vs Cleveland Browns preseason game?

The Cleveland Browns defeated the Los Angeles Rams 19-17 on August 23, 2025.

Who was the leading passer for the Rams against the Browns?

Dresser Winn led the Rams passing attack with 15 completions on 23 attempts, 190 yards, and one touchdown.

Who were the top offensive performers for the Browns?

Dillon Gabriel led Cleveland in passing with 129 yards and one touchdown, while Jamari Thrash led receivers with 42 yards.

Which team had more receiving yards in the game?

The Cleveland Browns recorded more receiving yards with 221 compared to the Rams’ 190 receiving yards.

Did either team record an interception?

No. Both the Rams and Browns finished the game without an interception.

Which team had more sacks?

The Los Angeles Rams recorded more sacks with six compared to the Browns’ four sacks.

Conclusion

The los angeles rams vs cleveland browns match player stats show a competitive preseason matchup where small execution differences determined the winner. Cleveland’s balanced quarterback performance, stronger receiving production, and special teams contributions helped secure a 19-17 victory.

The Rams showed encouraging performances from Dresser Winn, Jordan Waters, and Brennan Presley, while their defensive front demonstrated the ability to create pressure. However, Cleveland’s ability to finish drives and maintain offensive consistency gave them the advantage.

The matchup also highlighted an important lesson in football analysis: statistics must be viewed through context. Passing yards, rushing totals, and defensive numbers provide valuable information, but efficiency, situational performance, and execution often decide close games.

For evaluating preseason football, the most meaningful insights come from understanding how individual performances contribute to team development and future roster decisions.