Timberwolves vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats
The timberwolves vs memphis grizzlies match player stats from the December 17, 2025 matchup provide a detailed look at how Memphis defeated Minnesota 116-110 at Target Center. The Grizzlies received a dominant all-around performance from Jaren Jackson Jr., who finished with 28 points and 12 rebounds, while Jock Landale added 20 points and 10 rebounds off the bench. Minnesota had several strong individual performances of its own, including Julius Randle’s team-high 21 points, Rudy Gobert’s 16 points and 16 rebounds, and Donte DiVincenzo’s 19 points and 11 rebounds.
The final score does not fully explain why Memphis won. Both teams finished with 18 turnovers, and Minnesota actually recorded more assists and blocks. The difference came from Memphis shooting more efficiently, converting free throws at a higher rate, controlling the overall rebounding battle, and getting considerably more production from its bench.
This detailed breakdown examines the player statistics, team numbers, shooting efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, defensive production, bench impact, and the key moments that decided the game.
Game Overview
The matchup was played at Target Center in Minneapolis in front of 16,287 spectators. Memphis entered the game with a 13-14 overall record, including a 7-7 road record. Minnesota entered at 17-10 overall and 9-5 at home.
Memphis ultimately won 116-110.
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Memphis Grizzlies | 29 | 32 | 27 | 28 | 116 |
| Minnesota Timberwolves | 27 | 35 | 21 | 27 | 110 |
The quarter scores reveal an important part of the story.
Memphis started slightly better, leading 29-27 after the opening period. Minnesota then responded with a strong second quarter, scoring 35 points to Memphis’ 32 and taking momentum into halftime.
The third quarter changed the direction of the contest.
Memphis scored 27 points while Minnesota managed only 21. The Grizzlies then held on in the fourth quarter, outscoring Minnesota 28-27 to secure the six-point victory.
This was therefore not a game where one team dominated for 48 minutes. Minnesota had stretches of control, but Memphis responded more effectively when the game reached its most important moments.
Timberwolves vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats
The individual numbers provide the clearest picture of which players influenced the result.
Memphis Grizzlies Player Leaders
Jaren Jackson Jr. was the leading scorer and rebounder for Memphis.
His final statistics were:
| Statistic | Jaren Jackson Jr. |
| Points | 28 |
| Rebounds | 12 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Blocks | 3 |
| Field Goals | 10/18 |
| Three-Pointers | 2/3 |
| Free Throws | 6/6 |
| Minutes | 33:27 |
Jackson shot 10-of-18 from the field, giving him a 55.6% field-goal percentage.
That efficiency was especially valuable because he was not simply relying on high-volume shooting. He converted his opportunities at a strong rate while also contributing on the glass and protecting the rim.
His 12 rebounds were also significant because Minnesota had Rudy Gobert, one of the league’s strongest rebounders, controlling the center position.
Jackson’s three blocks added another layer to his performance. He was therefore involved in nearly every major statistical category.
The combination of 28 points, 12 rebounds and 3 blocks made Jackson the most complete individual performer for Memphis.
Jock Landale
Jock Landale was one of the biggest reasons Memphis was able to win.
He finished with:
| Statistic | Jock Landale |
| Points | 20 |
| Rebounds | 10 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Steals | 2 |
| Blocks | 1 |
| Field Goals | 8/15 |
| Three-Pointers | 4/9 |
| Minutes | 29:55 |
| Plus/Minus | +19 |
Landale’s performance was particularly important because he combined interior production with perimeter shooting.
He made four three-pointers and collected ten rebounds, creating a difficult matchup for Minnesota’s defense.
If Minnesota treated him like a traditional interior player, he had enough shooting ability to punish the defense from outside. If defenders moved toward him, Memphis had additional space to operate.
His +19 plus/minus was the strongest mark among the players who received substantial minutes for Memphis.
Although plus/minus should not be used by itself to judge a player, it supports what the rest of the box score shows. Memphis was extremely effective during Landale’s minutes.
Jaylen Wells
Jaylen Wells added an important two-way contribution.
He recorded:
- 17 points
- 4 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 4 steals
- 5-of-13 field goals
- 2-of-6 three-pointers
- 31:21 minutes
His four steals were the highest total recorded by any player in the game.
That defensive activity helped Memphis create additional opportunities even though the two teams finished with identical turnover totals.
Wells was not the most efficient scorer on the floor, but his defensive activity added value that does not always appear in the basic scoring column.
Cedric Coward
Cedric Coward contributed 13 points, 5 rebounds, 3 assists and 1 steal.
He shot 5-of-12 from the field.
His contribution was important because Memphis did not need Jackson to handle every offensive responsibility.
Coward’s scoring gave the Grizzlies another option and helped maintain offensive balance.
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope
Kentavious Caldwell-Pope finished with:
- 12 points
- 1 rebound
- 3 assists
- 1 steal
- 4-of-12 field goals
- 2-of-5 three-pointers
His outside shooting helped Memphis maintain spacing around Jackson and the other frontcourt players.
His role was less about volume and more about creating enough perimeter threat to prevent Minnesota from loading its defense toward the paint.
Santi Aldama
Santi Aldama finished with:
- 8 points
- 11 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 4-of-8 shooting
His eight points do not immediately stand out, but his 11 rebounds were highly valuable.
Aldama was one of three Memphis players who reached double figures in rebounds or came very close to it, alongside Jackson and Landale.
That collective rebounding effort prevented Minnesota from gaining the type of advantage that its size might normally create.
Brandon Clarke
Brandon Clarke recorded:
- 6 points
- 3 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 1 steal
His minutes provided Memphis with additional frontcourt depth.
Having multiple players capable of contributing around the basket allowed Memphis to keep its rotation flexible throughout the game.
Minnesota Timberwolves Player Stats
Minnesota also received excellent individual production.
The difference was that Memphis generated more collective value from its supporting cast.
Julius Randle
Julius Randle led Minnesota with 21 points.
His complete line was:
| Statistic | Julius Randle |
| Points | 21 |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 3 |
| Steals | 3 |
| Field Goals | 9/21 |
| Three-Pointers | 1/6 |
| Minutes | 35:18 |
Randle shot 42.9% from the field.
He was also active defensively, recording three steals.
However, his three-point shooting was a problem for Minnesota. He made only one of six attempts from beyond the arc.
When a primary offensive player is not converting from long range, opposing defenses can sometimes adjust by giving slightly more attention to driving lanes and interior threats.
Randle still produced the team’s highest scoring total, but Memphis was able to live with some of his perimeter attempts.
Rudy Gobert
Rudy Gobert delivered one of the strongest statistical performances of the entire game.
He finished with:
- 16 points
- 16 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 1 steal
- 4 blocks
- 6-of-8 field goals
- 35:28 minutes
Gobert led all players in rebounds.
He also tied for the game lead in blocks, producing four.
His 16 rebounds demonstrate how effectively he controlled the interior glass.
However, Memphis still finished with 54 total rebounds compared with Minnesota’s 52.
That is an important distinction.
Gobert individually won the rebounding battle, but Memphis’ collective frontcourt effort prevented Minnesota from turning his dominance into a team-level advantage.
Donte DiVincenzo
Donte DiVincenzo recorded:
- 19 points
- 11 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 3 steals
- 1 block
- 6-of-16 field goals
- 4-of-11 three-pointers
- 37:17 minutes
His 11 rebounds were especially impressive for a perimeter-oriented player.
DiVincenzo also made four three-pointers, tying Landale for the most made threes in the game.
His overall performance was one of Minnesota’s strongest.
The problem was that Minnesota needed more efficient scoring from several players to overcome Memphis’ balanced attack.
Jaden McDaniels
Jaden McDaniels produced an important playmaking performance.
He recorded:
- 13 points
- 7 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 1 steal
- 1 block
- 36:44 minutes
His six assists led Minnesota.
McDaniels helped move the ball and created opportunities for teammates, contributing to Minnesota’s 26 total assists.
The Timberwolves actually finished with three more assists than Memphis.
Yet their lower shooting percentage meant that the additional passing did not translate into enough additional points.
Bones Hyland
Bones Hyland finished with:
- 12 points
- 3 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 1 steal
- 3-of-11 shooting
- 2-of-9 three-pointers
His five assists were second on Minnesota.
However, his shooting efficiency was a significant weakness.
He made only 27.3% of his field-goal attempts and 22.2% from three-point range.
In a six-point game, inefficient perimeter shooting can have an outsized effect.
Naz Reid
Naz Reid added 16 points, 7 rebounds, 2 assists, 1 steal and 1 block.
He shot 6-of-16 from the field and 3-of-11 from three-point range.
Reid provided important scoring, but his long-range shooting was inconsistent.
Minnesota relied heavily on three-point attempts during the game, and Reid’s 3-of-11 shooting from deep illustrates the challenge.
Other Minnesota Contributors
Terrence Shannon Jr. scored 6 points and grabbed 1 rebound.
Rob Dillingham contributed 5 points, 1 rebound and 2 assists.
Jaylen Clark added 2 points, 1 rebound, 1 assist and 1 steal.
These contributions were not enough to close the overall bench-scoring gap.
Complete Team Statistical Comparison
The team statistics reveal why Memphis came away with the win.
| Category | Memphis | Minnesota |
| Final Score | 116 | 110 |
| Field Goals | 42/96 | 39/98 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 43.8% | 39.8% |
| Three-Pointers | 11/34 | 13/44 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 32.4% | 29.5% |
| Free Throws | 21/25 | 19/27 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 84.0% | 70.4% |
| Rebounds | 54 | 52 |
| Assists | 23 | 26 |
| Turnovers | 18 | 18 |
| Steals | 10 | 11 |
| Blocks | 4 | 8 |
Several numbers immediately stand out.
- Memphis shot better from the field.
- Memphis shot better from three.
- Memphis shot much better from the free-throw line.
<span style=”font-weight: 400;”>Memphis won the rebounding battle.
Minnesota led in assists, steals and blocks.
The result demonstrates that defensive box-score categories do not automatically determine the winner.
Minnesota’s eight blocks were impressive, but Memphis still scored 116 points.
The Timberwolves’ 26 assists were also strong, but their 39-of-98 shooting limited the value of those extra passing opportunities.
Shooting Efficiency Decided the Margin
One of the most important lessons from this game is the difference between shot volume and shot efficiency.
Minnesota attempted 98 field goals.
Memphis attempted 96.
So Minnesota actually took two more shots.
Yet Memphis made three more field goals.
That produced a six-point final advantage.
The shooting percentage difference was nearly four percentage points.
Memphis also made 21 free throws compared with Minnesota’s 19 despite taking two fewer attempts.
That gave Memphis an additional efficiency advantage.
The Timberwolves did make two more three-pointers, but they needed ten more attempts to do so.
This is why simply looking at the number of made threes can be misleading.
The Three-Point Battle
Minnesota made 13 three-pointers.
Memphis made 11.
At first glance, this appears to favor Minnesota.
But the percentages tell a different story.
Memphis:
11-of-34, 32.4%
Minnesota:
13-of-44, 29.5%
Minnesota attempted 44 three-pointers, meaning almost half of its field-goal attempts came from beyond the arc.
The strategy created scoring opportunities, but the conversion rate was not strong enough.
Memphis was more efficient while using fewer attempts.
That balance allowed the Grizzlies to score 116 points without needing to rely heavily on three-point volume.
Free Throws Created Another Difference
Memphis converted 21 of 25 free throws.
Minnesota made 19 of 27.
The percentages were:
- Memphis: 84.0%
- Minnesota: 70.4%
The difference was significant.
Minnesota left eight free-throw attempts unconverted.
Memphis missed only four.
In a game decided by six points, those missed opportunities become particularly important.
Free throws are often among the simplest scoring opportunities available, so efficiency at the line can become a deciding factor in close contests.
Rebounding Was a Team Effort
Gobert’s 16 rebounds were the highest individual total.
But Memphis had three players with ten or more rebounds or close to that mark:
- Jaren Jackson Jr.: 12
- Santi Aldama: 11
- Jock Landale: 10
That collective effort allowed Memphis to finish with 54 rebounds.
Minnesota finished with 52.
The Timberwolves still controlled the offensive glass slightly, but Memphis prevented second-chance opportunities from becoming a major problem.
This is a good example of why team rebounding can be more important than one player’s individual rebounding total.
The Bench Scoring Difference
The biggest hidden factor was Memphis’ bench.
Memphis received 44 bench points.
Minnesota received 29.
That produced a 15-point advantage.
The final margin was six points.
Therefore, the bench-scoring difference was more than twice the final margin.
That does not mean the bench alone decided the game, but it shows how important the second unit was.
Landale was the clearest example.
His 20 points and 10 rebounds gave Memphis production that Minnesota did not receive at the same level from its reserves.
The Third Quarter Changed the Momentum
Minnesota had won the second quarter 35-32.
The Timberwolves were therefore in a strong position heading into the second half.
Memphis responded by winning the third quarter 27-21.
The six-point third-quarter advantage was effectively the same as the final six-point margin.
This means that the third quarter was central to the result.
Memphis found ways to create better offensive possessions while limiting Minnesota’s scoring.
The Grizzlies also responded to Minnesota’s runs rather than allowing the game to become one-sided.
That resilience was important.
The 14-2 Memphis Run
One of the most important sequences came when Minnesota appeared to be gaining control.
Memphis responded with a 14-2 run.
The significance of this run goes beyond the number itself.
A 14-2 run represents a 12-point swing in scoring margin.
In a game that ended with a six-point difference, that sequence was enough to change the entire direction of the contest.
Multiple Memphis players contributed during the run.
That is important because it prevented Minnesota from simply focusing on Jackson.
When several players can score during the same stretch, defensive adjustments become more difficult.
Fourth Quarter Execution
The final quarter remained competitive.
Minnesota did not simply disappear after Memphis regained control.
The Timberwolves continued to create scoring opportunities and came within a few possessions.
The difference was Memphis’ ability to answer key Minnesota baskets.
Landale’s perimeter shooting became especially important.
Jackson also provided late scoring.
That combination allowed Memphis to maintain enough separation to avoid a final-minute collapse.
Why Minnesota Lost Despite Strong Individual Numbers
The Timberwolves had several excellent individual performances.
Gobert recorded a double-double with 16 points and 16 rebounds.
DiVincenzo produced 19 points and 11 rebounds.
Randle scored 21.
McDaniels recorded six assists.
Minnesota had eight blocks and 26 assists.
So why did the team lose?
The answer is efficiency and depth.
Minnesota shot under 40% from the field.
The team shot under 30% from three.
Free-throw shooting was only 70.4%.
The bench produced 29 points.
These weaknesses offset the team’s strong rebounding, passing and defensive statistics.
Why Memphis Won
Memphis’ winning formula was more balanced.
The Grizzlies had:
- A 28-point scorer
- A 20-point double-double from the bench
- A 17-point defensive contributor
- Three players with 11 or more rebounds
- Better overall field-goal shooting
- Better three-point efficiency
- Better free-throw shooting
- A narrow rebounding advantage
- A significant bench-scoring advantage
That is a strong combination.
The Grizzlies did not need one player to dominate every statistical category.
Instead, several players filled different roles.
The Importance of Jackson’s Performance
Jackson’s performance deserves special attention.
- His 28 points represented nearly one-quarter of Memphis’ total scoring.
- His 12 rebounds represented a major share of the team’s 54 rebounds.
- His three blocks also helped protect the paint.
- He was therefore not simply Memphis’ leading scorer.
- He was involved in the game’s central physical battle.
Against a Minnesota team featuring Gobert, Jackson’s ability to contribute on the glass was particularly valuable.
The Importance of Landale’s Performance
If Jackson was the headline performer, Landale was the difference-maker from the supporting cast.
A 20-point, 10-rebound double-double is already impressive.
Adding four made three-pointers makes the performance even more significant.
- His shooting forced Minnesota to respect him away from the basket.
- His rebounding prevented the Timberwolves from controlling the glass.
- His +19 plus/minus also indicates how effective Memphis was while he was on the court.
The game illustrates why second-unit production matters so much in NBA matchups.
The Importance of Gobert’s Performance
Gobert had an excellent individual game.
Sixteen rebounds and four blocks demonstrate his defensive and rebounding impact.
He also shot 6-of-8 from the field.
The problem was that his individual success did not translate into enough team-level advantage.
Memphis continued to score efficiently despite Gobert’s presence.
That suggests the Grizzlies found ways to attack areas outside of the direct Gobert matchup.
The Role of DiVincenzo
DiVincenzo’s 19 points and 11 rebounds made him one of Minnesota’s most complete players.
He also recorded four assists and three steals.
His four made threes gave Minnesota needed perimeter production.
However, he took 16 shots to reach 19 points.
That is not necessarily poor, but it shows that Minnesota needed greater efficiency from multiple players to overcome Memphis.
What the Stats Say About Team Depth
The matchup provides a useful lesson about depth.
When a team is missing a primary offensive star, the supporting cast becomes much more important.
Both Memphis and Minnesota entered this game without one of their major scoring threats.
That created additional responsibilities for secondary players.
Memphis handled those responsibilities more effectively.
Jackson became the offensive leader.
Landale produced from the bench.
Wells provided defensive pressure.
Aldama rebounded.
Minnesota had strong individual performances, but Memphis received more balanced contributions.
Practical Lessons From the Match
Anyone studying NBA player statistics can take several lessons from this game.
Do Not Judge a Game Only by the Leading Scorer
Jackson led the game in scoring, but Landale’s contribution was also critical.
A box score should be viewed as a collection of connected performances.
Shooting Percentage Matters
Minnesota attempted more field goals but made fewer.
The extra volume did not compensate for lower efficiency.
Bench Production Can Decide Close Games
The 44-29 bench scoring difference was enormous compared with the six-point final margin.
Rebounding Needs to Be Viewed Collectively
Gobert led all players in rebounds, but Memphis still won the team rebounding battle.
Defensive Statistics Need Context
Minnesota had twice as many blocks as Memphis.
Yet Memphis scored 116 points.
Blocks alone cannot describe defensive success.
Free Throws Matter
Memphis converted 84% of its free throws.
Minnesota converted only 70.4%.
In a six-point game, that efficiency gap matters.
Season Series Context
The supplied matchup information includes additional meetings between these teams during the season.
The December game was won by Memphis 116-110.
A later matchup saw Minnesota defeat Memphis 131-114.
Another listed meeting resulted in Memphis winning 137-128.
Minnesota also recorded a 117-110 victory in another meeting.
These results demonstrate that the matchup was competitive and that neither team consistently controlled the other across every meeting.
The changing results also reinforce an important point about NBA statistics.
One game’s player numbers should not automatically be used to predict every future meeting.
Player availability, rotations, shooting form, injuries, defensive strategy and home-court conditions can all change the statistical profile of a matchup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the game?
Jaren Jackson Jr. led all players with 28 points for Memphis. Julius Randle was Minnesota’s leading scorer with 21 points.
Who had the most rebounds?
Rudy Gobert led the game with 16 rebounds. Jaren Jackson Jr. had 12, while Santi Aldama and Donte DiVincenzo each recorded 11.
Who led Minnesota in assists?
Jaden McDaniels led the Timberwolves with 6 assists. Bones Hyland followed with 5 assists, while Rudy Gobert and Donte DiVincenzo each had 4.
Which team had the better shooting percentage?
Memphis shot 43.8% from the field, while Minnesota shot 39.8%. Memphis also had the better three-point percentage and free-throw percentage.
Who had the best defensive statistics?
Rudy Gobert led the game with 4 blocks, while Jaylen Wells recorded a game-high 4 steals. Jaren Jackson Jr. also contributed 3 blocks.
What was the final score?
The Memphis Grizzlies defeated the Minnesota Timberwolves 116-110.
Conclusion
The timberwolves vs memphis grizzlies match player stats reveal a game that was decided by collective efficiency rather than one isolated statistic.
Jaren Jackson Jr. was the central figure for Memphis with 28 points, 12 rebounds and 3 blocks. His ability to score efficiently while contributing on the glass was a major reason the Grizzlies were able to handle Minnesota’s size.
Jock Landale provided perhaps the most important supporting performance with 20 points, 10 rebounds and four made three-pointers. His ability to contribute both inside and outside created problems for Minnesota’s defense.
Jaylen Wells added 17 points and four steals, while Santi Aldama contributed 11 rebounds. Together, Memphis’ supporting players prevented the offense from becoming overly dependent on Jackson.
Minnesota had several impressive performances as well.
Julius Randle led the Timberwolves with 21 points. Rudy Gobert recorded 16 points and 16 rebounds with four blocks. Donte DiVincenzo added 19 points and 11 rebounds, while Jaden McDaniels produced six assists.
However, Minnesota struggled to convert its opportunities efficiently.
The Timberwolves shot 39.8% from the field and 29.5% from three-point range. Memphis shot 43.8% overall and 32.4% from deep. The Grizzlies also converted free throws at an 84% rate compared with Minnesota’s 70.4%.
The bench numbers were another major difference.
Memphis received 44 bench points compared with 29 from Minnesota. That 15-point difference was larger than the final six-point margin and demonstrates how important secondary scoring was in this matchup.
The third quarter ultimately became the turning point. After Minnesota had won the second period, Memphis responded strongly and eventually created a decisive swing. The Grizzlies then executed well enough in the fourth quarter to protect the advantage.
The final 116-110 score therefore reflects a game in which Minnesota had several strong individual performances but Memphis produced the more efficient and balanced team performance.
