Phoenix Suns vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats

The phoenix suns vs san antonio spurs match player stats from the November 3, 2025 meeting tell a much deeper story than the final 130-118 score. Phoenix did not simply win because Devin Booker scored 28 points. The Suns created one of their most efficient offensive performances of the season, shooting 58% from the field and 19-of-33 from three-point range while Booker controlled the game as both a scorer and primary playmaker. San Antonio, meanwhile, received a strong 26-point performance from Stephon Castle but struggled to match Phoenix’s perimeter efficiency.

This game is especially useful for anyone studying NBA player performance because the box score shows several different layers of impact. Booker produced 28 points and 13 assists, Ryan Dunn posted a remarkable +32 plus/minus, Grayson Allen and Royce O’Neale supplied efficient three-point shooting, and Mark Williams led Phoenix with seven rebounds. For San Antonio, Castle emerged as the leading scorer and assist leader, while Victor Wembanyama finished with nine rebounds but had a difficult scoring night.

The result was Phoenix 130, San Antonio 118, giving the Suns a 3-4 record and handing the Spurs their first defeat after a 5-0 start. The official NBA game record lists the contest at Mortgage Matchup Center in Phoenix with an attendance of 17,071.

Phoenix Suns vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The most important numbers from the game are straightforward:

Category	San Antonio Spurs	Phoenix Suns
Final Score	118	130
Field Goals	45-98	46-79
Field Goal Percentage	46%	58%
Three-Pointers	10-41	19-33
Three-Point Percentage	24%	58%
Free Throws	18-23	19-22
Free Throw Percentage	78%	86%
Rebounds	41	39
Assists	21	34
Turnovers	14	20
Steals	11	8
Blocks	5	4

The first thing that stands out is that Phoenix won despite committing six more turnovers.

That is important because turnovers often become the easiest explanation for an NBA loss. Here, that explanation does not work. San Antonio protected the ball better, collected more rebounds, and recorded more steals, yet Phoenix still won comfortably because its shot-making and ball movement generated a much more efficient offensive attack.

The Suns made 46 of 79 field-goal attempts. The Spurs attempted 98 shots but made only 45.

That difference tells the story.

San Antonio generated more volume. Phoenix generated more efficiency.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The scoring pattern also explains how the game developed:

Quarter	Spurs	Suns
1st	24	31
2nd	28	39
3rd	26	32
4th	40	28
Final	118	130

Phoenix built its advantage before San Antonio’s fourth-quarter comeback attempt could matter.

The Suns led 31-24 after the opening quarter and expanded the margin to 18 points by halftime after scoring 39 points in the second period. Phoenix then added another 32 points in the third.

The Spurs eventually won the fourth quarter 40-28, but by then the damage had already been done.

This is one of the clearest lessons from the phoenix suns vs san antonio spurs match player stats: a strong fourth quarter cannot always repair three quarters of inefficient basketball.

Devin Booker Dominated the Game as a Scorer and Playmaker

Devin Booker was the central figure in Phoenix’s offensive success.

He finished with:

• 28 points
• 13 assists
• 10-of-15 shooting from the field
• A double-double

The 13 assists are arguably more important than the 28 points.

Booker did not need to dominate every possession as a scorer because Phoenix was shooting the ball at an exceptional level. Instead, he repeatedly created opportunities for teammates.

That distinction matters when evaluating his performance.

A 28-point game can be impressive. A 28-point, 13-assist performance while shooting 10-of-15 is something else entirely.

Booker’s efficiency allowed Phoenix to maintain pressure without forcing difficult shots. His playmaking also helped unlock the team’s three-point attack.

According to the official NBA game summary, Booker scored 28 points and produced 13 assists in the Suns’ 130-118 victory.

Booker’s First-Half Influence

Booker’s impact was already obvious before halftime.

He entered the break with 14 points and nine assists, meaning his passing was influencing the game almost as much as his scoring.

That created a difficult defensive problem for San Antonio.

If defenders concentrated on Booker, Phoenix had shooters ready to punish rotations.

If they stayed home on shooters, Booker could attack space or create for teammates.

This is why traditional scoring totals do not fully describe his performance.

His real contribution was controlling where the defense had to move.

Stephon Castle Led the Spurs in Scoring

Stephon Castle was San Antonio’s leading scorer with 26 points.

He also led the Spurs in assists with five.

Castle’s performance provided a bright spot in an otherwise difficult offensive night for San Antonio. His 26 points showed that the Spurs had a reliable perimeter scorer capable of creating offense even when the team’s primary interior threat was struggling.

Castle’s five assists also demonstrate that his contribution was not limited to shot creation.

However, the Spurs needed more offensive efficiency around him.

San Antonio shot only 46% from the field and 24% from three. The contrast between Castle’s scoring production and the team’s overall shooting efficiency illustrates the difference between individual success and team-level offensive execution.

Victor Wembanyama Had a Difficult Scoring Night

Victor Wembanyama entered the contest after a dominant opening stretch to the season, but Phoenix managed to make his scoring much less efficient.

The supplied game data credits Wembanyama with nine rebounds, while the official NBA recap records nine points on 4-of-14 shooting.

That is a major development when interpreting the game.

Wembanyama’s value cannot be reduced to scoring, especially because his size affects rebounding, rim protection, spacing, and defensive attention. Still, when a player of his importance shoots 4-of-14, the opposing team has a significant opportunity to change the game’s balance.

Phoenix benefited from exactly that.

Why Wembanyama’s Offensive Struggles Mattered

The Spurs could still generate points from other players, but Wembanyama’s reduced scoring efficiency changed the geometry of their offense.

A dominant interior scorer forces defenders to collapse.

That collapse creates:

• Open perimeter shots
• Driving lanes
• Offensive rebounding opportunities
• Easier passing angles
• More favorable one-on-one situations

When Wembanyama could not consistently convert his own attempts, Phoenix had fewer reasons to overreact defensively.

That helped the Suns stay connected to San Antonio’s other shooters.

The result was a Spurs offense that scored 118 points but needed 98 field-goal attempts to get there.

Phoenix’s Three-Point Shooting Was the Biggest Statistical Difference

The most striking number in the phoenix suns vs san antonio spurs match player stats is Phoenix’s three-point shooting.

The Suns made:

19 of 33 three-point attempts

That equals approximately 58%.

San Antonio made:

10 of 41 three-point attempts

That equals approximately 24%.

Phoenix therefore made nine more three-pointers despite attempting eight fewer.

That is an enormous efficiency advantage.

The Suns scored 57 points from beyond the arc.

The Spurs scored 30.

That alone created a 27-point difference in three-point scoring.

The official NBA recap also highlighted Phoenix’s 19-of-33 performance from three-point range as a major reason for the victory.

Grayson Allen’s Perimeter Impact

Grayson Allen was one of Phoenix’s most important outside shooters.

He made:

• 5 three-pointers
• 9 three-point attempts
• 17 points overall

His 5-of-9 shooting from deep gave Phoenix a reliable scoring outlet whenever San Antonio’s defense focused on Booker.

Allen’s value was not simply the points he scored.

Every successful three-pointer forces the defense to reconsider how aggressively it can help elsewhere.

That makes shooting accuracy a strategic weapon, not just a scoring statistic.

Royce O’Neale Provided Efficient Shooting

Royce O’Neale also contributed from outside, making 3 of 5 three-point attempts.

His 60% conversion rate from deep gave Phoenix another efficient floor-spacing option.

Players like O’Neale are particularly valuable in games where a primary ball-handler receives defensive attention. They can punish defensive rotations without requiring large numbers of possessions.

Ryan Dunn’s Three-Point Contribution

Ryan Dunn made 3 of 4 attempts from three-point range.

That is 75% shooting from deep.

Even more impressive was Dunn’s team-best +32 plus/minus.

The combination of efficient shooting and a +32 plus/minus makes his performance one of the most interesting elements of the box score.

Ryan Dunn’s +32 Plus/Minus Deserves Special Attention

Plus/minus is often misunderstood.

It does not mean a player personally created every point scored while he was on the court. It simply measures the team’s scoring margin during that player’s minutes.

Still, a +32 mark in a 12-point victory is significant.

Dunn finished with the best plus/minus on either team according to the supplied data.

That suggests Phoenix was particularly effective during his minutes.

Why?

His value likely came from several complementary areas:

1. Perimeter shooting
2. Defensive activity
3. Transition play
4. Lineup balance
5. Off-ball movement
6. Ability to play without dominating the ball

The important lesson is that impact does not always appear in the scoring column.

A player can score 17 points and still influence a game through the possessions that never become individual box-score events.

Mark Williams Controlled the Rebounding Battle for Phoenix

Mark Williams led the Suns with seven rebounds.

Phoenix actually finished with fewer total rebounds than San Antonio, 39 to 41.

That means the Suns did not win because of a rebounding advantage.

Instead, they won by making their possessions more efficient.

Williams’ seven rebounds were nevertheless important because Phoenix needed reliable interior activity while its perimeter players stretched the floor.

The Suns could not rely exclusively on three-point shooting. They also needed players capable of converting opportunities near the basket and competing on the glass.

Team Assists Reveal Phoenix’s Offensive Structure

Phoenix recorded 34 assists.

San Antonio recorded 21.

That is a 13-assist advantage.

It is one of the clearest indicators that the Suns were not simply winning through individual shot-making.

They were moving the ball.

Booker’s 13 assists were the headline number, but the team total shows broader offensive connectivity.

Phoenix’s passing helped create clean shooting opportunities, particularly from three-point range.

This is an important distinction for anyone studying the phoenix suns vs san antonio spurs match player stats.

The Suns’ 58% field-goal shooting was not purely a product of difficult contested shots going in.

Their passing helped create higher-quality opportunities.

The Spurs Actually Won Several Statistical Categories

A good game analysis should not pretend Phoenix dominated every category.

San Antonio finished with:

• 41 rebounds
• 21 assists
• 14 turnovers
• 11 steals
• 5 blocks

Phoenix finished with:

• 39 rebounds
• 34 assists
• 20 turnovers
• 8 steals
• 4 blocks

The Spurs therefore had advantages in rebounds, turnovers, steals, and blocks.

Yet they lost by 12.

That is a useful reminder that not all statistical categories carry the same weight in every game.

Phoenix’s shooting efficiency overwhelmed San Antonio’s advantages in possession-related statistics.

Turnovers Did Not Decide the Game

Phoenix committed 20 turnovers compared with 14 for San Antonio.

That is normally a warning sign.

The Suns gave away six additional possessions.

However, their shooting was so efficient that they were able to absorb that mistake rate.

This should not be interpreted as evidence that turnovers are unimportant.

It means that the Suns compensated for them unusually well in this particular matchup.

If Phoenix had shot closer to San Antonio’s three-point percentage, the turnover gap could have become decisive.

The Biggest Tactical Lesson: Efficiency Beat Volume

San Antonio attempted 98 field goals.

Phoenix attempted only 79.

That is a 19-attempt difference.

Yet Phoenix made one more field goal overall, 46 to 45.

This is perhaps the most revealing statistic in the entire game.

San Antonio generated more attempts but converted them at a significantly lower rate.

Phoenix generated fewer attempts and converted them at a dramatically higher rate.

That is what efficient offense looks like.

The Suns did not need to win the possession battle.

They won the quality-of-possession battle.

Why Phoenix’s Offense Was So Difficult to Defend

The Suns combined several strengths:

1. Elite Three-Point Accuracy

Making 19 threes at a 58% rate forced San Antonio to defend the entire width of the court.

2. Booker’s Playmaking

Booker’s 13 assists punished defensive overreactions.

3. Multiple Reliable Shooters

Allen, O’Neale, and Dunn collectively supplied high-value perimeter shooting.

4. Efficient Free-Throw Shooting

Phoenix converted 19 of 22 free throws, or 86%.

5. Interior and Perimeter Balance

The Suns did not rely entirely on jump shots. Their offense also generated opportunities closer to the basket.

Together, these factors created an offense that was difficult to contain with one defensive strategy.

San Antonio’s Fourth Quarter Shows Why the Game Was Not Over Early

The Spurs scored 40 points in the fourth quarter.

That is an excellent offensive quarter.

It also demonstrates that San Antonio did not simply stop competing after falling behind.

The problem was the size of the earlier deficit.

Phoenix entered the final period with enough separation to survive the Spurs’ late push.

This is why quarter-by-quarter analysis is more useful than simply reading the final score.

A 130-118 result can look relatively close.

The scoring pattern reveals that Phoenix had control for most of the night before San Antonio reduced the margin late.

What the Plus/Minus Numbers Can and Cannot Tell Us

Ryan Dunn’s +32 is noteworthy, but plus/minus should always be interpreted alongside other statistics.

For example, a player can post a strong plus/minus because he shares the court with an exceptional lineup.

Likewise, a good player can finish with a negative plus/minus because the opposing team’s best unit dominates a particular stretch.

The best approach is to combine plus/minus with:

• Shooting efficiency
• Rebounding
• Assists
• Turnovers
• Defensive events
• Lineup context
• Game situation

Dunn’s +32 becomes more meaningful because it came alongside 3-of-4 three-point shooting and a strong overall team performance.

Comparing the Main Players

Player	Team	Key Contribution
Devin Booker	Suns	28 points, 13 assists
Ryan Dunn	Suns	+32 plus/minus, 3-of-4 from three
Grayson Allen	Suns	5-of-9 from three
Royce O’Neale	Suns	3-of-5 from three
Mark Williams	Suns	7 rebounds
Stephon Castle	Spurs	26 points, 5 assists
Victor Wembanyama	Spurs	9 rebounds, 9 points on 4-of-14 shooting

This table illustrates the contrast between the two teams.

Phoenix received production across multiple roles.

San Antonio relied more heavily on Castle’s scoring while Wembanyama struggled to convert efficiently.

Phoenix Suns vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats and Fantasy Basketball

For fantasy basketball analysis, this game contains several useful lessons.

Booker’s 28-point, 13-assist performance is the obvious standout.

His combination of scoring and playmaking gives him a high fantasy ceiling because he can accumulate value without relying on one statistical category.

Wembanyama’s nine rebounds still provided value, but his nine-point scoring output was far below what fantasy managers normally expect from a player of his caliber.

Castle’s 26 points also make his performance notable.

Meanwhile, Dunn’s +32 plus/minus is useful for real-game analysis but should not be treated like a conventional fantasy category unless a specific fantasy format counts it.

What the Game Says About Phoenix

Phoenix’s victory showed that its offense could overwhelm a strong opponent through efficiency.

The Suns entered the game with a 3-4 record, so the result was not simply a routine win for a dominant team.

Instead, it was a performance that demonstrated what the roster could look like when the shooting connected at an elite level.

The most encouraging aspect was the variety of contributors.

Booker led the offense.

Allen stretched the floor.

O’Neale added efficient shooting.

Dunn supplied two-way impact.

Williams helped on the glass.

That kind of distribution makes an offense harder to neutralize.

What the Game Says About San Antonio

San Antonio’s 5-1 start showed that the Spurs were capable of competing at a high level.

But this loss exposed a specific vulnerability.

When the opponent shoots 58% from the field and 58% from three, defensive execution has to be exceptional to compensate.

The Spurs also needed greater shooting efficiency from outside.

A 10-of-41 night from three made it extremely difficult to keep pace with Phoenix.

The positive takeaway was Castle’s 26-point performance and the team’s 40-point fourth quarter.

The loss was therefore less about an inability to score and more about the inability to match Phoenix’s efficiency early.

The Most Important Numbers at a Glance

If you only have a minute to understand the game, focus on these statistics:

Phoenix: 130 points

San Antonio: 118 points

Booker: 28 points and 13 assists

Castle: 26 points and 5 assists

Wembanyama: 9 points and 9 rebounds

Suns: 46-of-79 from the field

Spurs: 45-of-98 from the field

Suns: 19-of-33 from three

Spurs: 10-of-41 from three

Suns assists: 34

Spurs assists: 21

Dunn plus/minus: +32

Those numbers explain most of the game without requiring a complicated statistical model.

How to Analyze NBA Player Stats Beyond Points

One of the most common mistakes in basketball analysis is focusing exclusively on points.

Points matter, but they are only one part of player impact.

A better approach is to ask:

Did the player shoot efficiently?

A player scoring 25 points on 20 shots is different from a player scoring 25 points on 12 shots.

Did the player create opportunities?

Assists and secondary playmaking reveal whether a player helped teammates score.

Did the player control possessions?

Turnovers, offensive rebounds, steals, and defensive pressure all influence possession value.

Did the player’s lineup perform well?

Plus/minus can help identify whether a lineup was successful during a player’s minutes.

Did the player influence the defensive game plan?

This is harder to quantify but often crucial.

Wembanyama, for example, can influence defensive decisions even when he is not scoring at a high level.

A Practical Framework for Reading a Box Score

When analyzing a future NBA matchup, use this five-step process:

1. Start with efficiency. Compare field-goal and three-point percentages.
2. Check shot volume. Determine which team generated more attempts.
3. Examine creation. Compare assists and secondary playmaking.
4. Review possession control. Look at turnovers, rebounds, and steals.
5. Study individual context. Identify who produced efficiently and who struggled.

This method prevents a single statistic from dominating the entire analysis.

Historical Context of the Matchup

The Suns entered this game looking to improve their early-season record, while San Antonio arrived unbeaten through its first five games.

That context increased the significance of the result.

Phoenix did not beat a struggling opponent.

The Suns defeated a Spurs team that had started the season 5-0.

The victory also moved Phoenix to 3-4 and gave the Suns a 1-0 lead in the season series according to the supplied game data.

The official NBA recap likewise records the Spurs’ first loss and Phoenix’s move to 3-4.

Who Was the Best Player?

Devin Booker is the strongest candidate for the game’s most influential player.

His 28 points were important, but his 13 assists are what separate his performance from a typical scoring night.

He controlled the offense and helped Phoenix exploit San Antonio’s defensive rotations.

Ryan Dunn deserves special recognition because of his +32 plus/minus and efficient three-point shooting.

Stephon Castle was the Spurs’ standout scorer with 26 points and five assists.

If the question is strictly about who had the greatest overall offensive influence, Booker has the clearest case.

If the question is about unexpected two-way impact, Dunn’s performance deserves significant attention.

Who Had the Toughest Night?

Victor Wembanyama had the most difficult offensive game among the Spurs’ major players.

Nine points on 4-of-14 shooting was well below his usual scoring standard.

However, reducing his performance to scoring would be unfair.

His nine rebounds still mattered, and his defensive presence remains valuable even when the shooting numbers are poor.

The larger issue was that San Antonio needed more efficiency from its centerpiece against a Phoenix team shooting at an extraordinary rate.

Final Statistical Verdict

The phoenix suns vs san antonio spurs match player stats reveal a game decided primarily by shooting efficiency and offensive creation.

San Antonio had more rebounds, fewer turnovers, more steals, and more blocks.

Phoenix still won because it converted its opportunities at a far higher rate.

The Suns shot 58% overall and 58% from three.

The Spurs shot 46% overall and 24% from three.

Phoenix also produced 34 assists compared with 21 for San Antonio.

That combination of accuracy and ball movement proved more important than the Spurs’ advantages in several possession categories.

Booker’s 28 points and 13 assists were the headline performance. Castle’s 26 points gave San Antonio a strong individual scoring effort. Dunn’s +32 plus/minus highlighted the value of complementary players. Allen and O’Neale supplied efficient perimeter shooting, while Wembanyama’s nine rebounds showed that his impact extended beyond scoring despite his difficult shooting night.

Ultimately, this was a textbook example of how an NBA team can overcome turnovers and a slight rebounding disadvantage by creating better shots and converting them at an exceptional rate.

FAQs

Who scored the most points in the game?

Devin Booker led Phoenix with 28 points, while Stephon Castle led San Antonio with 26 points.

How many assists did Devin Booker have?

Booker recorded 13 assists, making him the game’s leading playmaker.

How many points did Victor Wembanyama score?

Wembanyama scored nine points and grabbed nine rebounds. The official NBA recap lists him at 4-of-14 shooting from the field.

Which Suns player had the best plus/minus?

Ryan Dunn had the best plus/minus for Phoenix at +32.

Which team shot better from three-point range?

Phoenix was substantially more efficient, making 19 of 33 three-point attempts for 58%. San Antonio made 10 of 41 for 24%.

What was the final score?

The Phoenix Suns defeated the San Antonio Spurs 130-118.

Conclusion

The phoenix suns vs san antonio spurs match player stats provide a clear example of why basketball analysis needs to go beyond the final score.

Phoenix won 130-118 because its offense combined elite shooting with outstanding playmaking. Devin Booker led the attack with 28 points and 13 assists, while Ryan Dunn delivered a +32 plus/minus and shot 3-of-4 from three. Grayson Allen and Royce O’Neale also helped stretch the defense with efficient perimeter shooting.

San Antonio had strong individual production from Stephon Castle, who scored 26 points and added five assists. Victor Wembanyama contributed nine rebounds but struggled offensively, scoring nine points on 4-of-14 shooting.

The most important team statistic was Phoenix’s three-point shooting. The Suns made 19 of 33 attempts, while San Antonio made only 10 of 41. That 27-point advantage from beyond the arc was a major reason Phoenix could overcome its six additional turnovers and slightly lower rebounding total.

The game ultimately demonstrates a simple but important basketball principle: possession advantages matter, but efficiency can overwhelm them. Phoenix generated fewer field-goal attempts, yet made one more field goal than San Antonio. The Suns converted their opportunities at an elite rate, moved the ball exceptionally well, and built enough of a lead to withstand San Antonio’s 40-point fourth quarter.

For readers evaluating NBA player performances, this matchup is best understood through the combination of scoring, efficiency, assists, shooting profile, rebounding, turnovers, and plus/minus rather than through points alone.