Washington Commanders vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats

The Washington commanders vs green bay packers match player stats tell the complete story behind Green Bay’s 27 to 18 victory on 12 September 2025. While the final score suggests a competitive contest, the numbers reveal how the Packers controlled the game through efficient quarterback play, a balanced rushing attack, and consistent defensive pressure. Washington showed resilience in the fourth quarter, but Green Bay had already built a lead that proved difficult to overcome.

This matchup offered several important takeaways for fans, analysts, and fantasy football followers. Jordan Love delivered one of his most efficient performances of the season, Josh Jacobs controlled the ground game, and Tucker Kraft emerged as the biggest receiving threat. On the opposite side, Jayden Daniels continued to display poise despite facing constant pressure, while veterans Bobby Wagner and Zach Ertz remained among Washington’s most reliable contributors.

Rather than focusing only on the final score, this analysis breaks down every major statistical category, explains why certain numbers mattered more than others, and highlights the performances that ultimately decided the outcome.

Match Overview

Match Detail	Information
Game	Green Bay Packers vs Washington Commanders
Date	12 September 2025
Competition	NFL
Venue	Green Bay Packers Home Stadium
Final Score	Green Bay Packers 27, Washington Commanders 18
Green Bay Record	2 to 0
Washington Record	1 to 1

Green Bay entered the contest looking to maintain its unbeaten start, while Washington hoped to earn an important road victory. Instead, the Packers controlled much of the afternoon by winning both the passing and rushing battles. Washington’s late scoring burst narrowed the margin, but Green Bay’s earlier dominance ensured the outcome was rarely in doubt.

Washington Commanders vs Green Bay Packers Match Player Stats

The biggest takeaway from the washington commanders vs green bay packers match player stats is the balance shown by Green Bay’s offense. The Packers gained more production through both the air and on the ground, allowing them to dictate the tempo throughout the game.

Team Statistical Snapshot

Category	Washington	Green Bay
Final Points	18	27
Passing Yards	200	292
Rushing Yards	51	135
Total Passing TD	2	2
Team Rushing TD	0	1
Total Sacks	2	4
QB Hits	4	12
Pass Deflections	3	8
Turnovers	0	0
Fumbles Lost	0	0

Although neither team committed a turnover, Green Bay consistently won the field position battle through stronger defense, more explosive passing plays, and a significantly better rushing attack.

Quarter by Quarter Breakdown

First Quarter

Green Bay established momentum immediately by scoring seven unanswered points. Washington failed to register a point during the opening period and struggled to generate sustained offensive drives.

Score after Q1

• Washington: 0
• Green Bay: 7

The Packers’ early success forced Washington to play from behind for the remainder of the contest.

Second Quarter

Green Bay continued applying pressure with another touchdown while Washington managed only a field goal.

Second Quarter Points

• Washington: 3
• Green Bay: 7

At halftime, Green Bay held a comfortable 14 to 3 advantage.

The difference was noticeable in offensive rhythm. Jordan Love consistently found open receivers, while Jayden Daniels faced pressure on multiple passing downs.

Third Quarter

Both defenses tightened during the third period.

Green Bay added a field goal to extend the lead.

Washington failed to score despite moving the football on several possessions.

Third Quarter Score

• Washington: 0
• Green Bay: 3

Heading into the final quarter, Green Bay led 17 to 3.

Fourth Quarter

Washington finally produced its most productive offensive stretch, scoring 15 points behind touchdown passes from Jayden Daniels.

However, Green Bay answered with 10 points of its own, preventing any serious comeback attempt.

Fourth Quarter Points

• Washington: 15
• Green Bay: 10

The late exchange made the final score appear closer than the overall flow of the game suggested.

How the Game Was Won

Several statistical advantages explain why Green Bay finished with the victory.

Superior Passing Efficiency

Jordan Love threw for nearly 300 yards while maintaining excellent efficiency.

His willingness to attack downfield resulted in explosive completions that consistently moved Green Bay into scoring position.

Dominant Running Game

Washington averaged only 2.7 yards per rushing attempt.

Green Bay averaged 4.5 yards per carry while giving Josh Jacobs a heavy workload.

That difference allowed Green Bay to control the clock and reduce pressure on its passing game.

Defensive Pressure

The Packers recorded:

• 4 sacks
• 12 quarterback hits
• 8 pass deflections

Washington managed:

• 2 sacks
• 4 quarterback hits
• 3 pass deflections

Those numbers clearly illustrate which defense disrupted opposing drives more consistently.

No Costly Mistakes

One interesting aspect of this contest is that neither team committed a turnover.

Instead, Green Bay simply executed better in nearly every offensive category while its defense consistently forced difficult situations for Washington.

Offensive Difference That Defined the Game

The statistics reveal one decisive trend.

Green Bay finished with:

• 292 passing yards
• 135 rushing yards

Washington recorded:

• 200 passing yards
• 51 rushing yards

That represents a combined offensive advantage of 176 total yards, a significant gap in an NFL game where every possession matters.

Green Bay’s balanced attack prevented Washington from focusing on stopping just one phase of the offense.

Meanwhile, Washington became increasingly one-dimensional as the game progressed, allowing Green Bay’s pass rush to attack aggressively.

This contrast became the defining storyline of the afternoon and explains why the Packers remained in control despite Washington’s fourth-quarter rally.

Quarterback Performance Analysis

Quarterback play often determines the outcome of NFL games, and this matchup was no exception. Although both starting quarterbacks avoided interceptions, Jordan Love delivered the more productive and efficient performance. His ability to stretch the field and capitalize on scoring opportunities gave Green Bay an advantage that Washington struggled to overcome.

Jordan Love Performance

Jordan Love finished with one of the most efficient outings of the young season.

Statistic	Value
Completions/Attempts	19/31
Passing Yards	292
Passing Touchdowns	2
Interceptions	0
Passer Rating	113.9
QBR	51.3

Love averaged more yards per completion than his counterpart and consistently attacked downfield. His timing with Green Bay’s receiving corps helped extend drives and create explosive plays. Just as importantly, he protected the football throughout the game, allowing the Packers to maintain momentum.

One of the biggest strengths of Love’s performance was his composure under pressure. Even when Washington generated a pass rush, he remained patient, found open receivers, and avoided risky throws.

Jayden Daniels Performance

Jayden Daniels showed determination despite playing from behind for most of the game.

Statistic	Value
Completions/Attempts	24/42
Passing Yards	200
Passing Touchdowns	2
Interceptions	0
Passer Rating	85.4
QBR	17.7

Daniels completed more passes than Love but required significantly more attempts to reach 200 passing yards. That difference reflects Green Bay’s effective pass coverage and the pressure created by its defensive front.

To Daniels’ credit, he never turned the football over and helped engineer Washington’s productive fourth quarter. However, the offense lacked explosive gains during the first three quarters, making the comeback effort too little, too late.

Quarterback Comparison

Category	Jayden Daniels	Jordan Love
Passing Yards	200	292
Touchdowns	2	2
Interceptions	0	0
Passer Rating	85.4	113.9
QBR	17.7	51.3

Although both quarterbacks protected the football, Jordan Love’s superior efficiency and higher yardage made a significant difference in the final result.

Rushing Leaders

The ground game was another area where Green Bay established clear control. The Packers committed to the run throughout the afternoon, while Washington struggled to gain consistent yardage.

Green Bay Packers Rushing Stats

Josh Jacobs carried the offense on the ground.

Player	Carries	Yards	Touchdowns
Josh Jacobs	23	84	1

Jacobs repeatedly gained positive yardage, helping Green Bay stay ahead of the chains. His physical running style also helped control possession during key stretches of the game.

As a team, Green Bay recorded:

• 30 rushing attempts
• 135 rushing yards
• 4.5 yards per carry
• 1 rushing touchdown

Those numbers highlight a balanced offensive approach that kept Washington’s defense guessing.

Washington Commanders Rushing Stats

Washington never established a consistent rushing attack.

Player	Carries	Yards	Average
Jacory Croskey-Merritt	4	17	4.3

Team rushing production:

• 19 carries
• 51 rushing yards
• 2.7 yards per carry
• 0 rushing touchdowns

Without an effective running game, Washington became increasingly dependent on passing situations, allowing Green Bay’s defense to focus on pressuring Jayden Daniels.

Receiving Leaders

Several receivers delivered impressive individual performances, but Tucker Kraft stood out as the game’s biggest playmaker.

Green Bay Packers Receiving Stats

Tucker Kraft

Receptions	Yards	Touchdowns
6	124	1

Kraft’s 124-yard performance proved to be the most explosive receiving effort of the game. His ability to create separation and gain yards after the catch consistently moved the chains.

Dontayvion Wicks

Receptions	Yards
4	44

Wicks provided another dependable option for Jordan Love, especially on intermediate routes.

Malik Heath

Receptions	Yards
1	37

Although he caught only one pass, Heath made it count with a 37-yard gain that helped flip field position.

Washington Commanders Receiving Stats

Washington’s receiving group produced two touchdown catches despite facing a disciplined Green Bay secondary.

Zach Ertz

Receptions	Yards	Touchdowns
6	64	1

The veteran tight end remained Daniels’ most reliable target throughout the afternoon. His experience helped sustain several important drives.

Deebo Samuel

Receptions	Yards	Touchdowns
7	44	1

Samuel led Washington in receptions. Although his average gain per catch was modest, he contributed an important touchdown during the fourth quarter.

Terry McLaurin

Receptions	Yards
5	48

McLaurin continued to provide dependable production but was largely contained by Green Bay’s defensive backs, limiting opportunities for explosive plays.

Team Receiving Comparison

Category	Washington	Green Bay
Receptions	24	19
Receiving Yards	200	292
Receiving Touchdowns	2	2

Washington completed more passes overall, but Green Bay generated significantly more yards, demonstrating greater efficiency and a stronger vertical passing attack.

The combination of Jordan Love’s accurate passing and Tucker Kraft’s breakout performance created the offensive edge that ultimately separated the two teams.

Defensive Player Statistics

Defense played a decisive role in this matchup. Although neither team forced a turnover, Green Bay consistently disrupted Washington’s offense through pressure, disciplined coverage, and timely tackles. The Packers finished with twice as many sacks and three times as many quarterback hits, making life difficult for Jayden Daniels throughout the afternoon.

Green Bay Packers Defensive Leaders

Edgerrin Cooper led the Packers with another productive performance.

Player	Total Tackles	Solo Tackles
Edgerrin Cooper	10	7

Cooper was active from the opening drive, helping limit Washington’s rushing attack while also contributing in pass coverage. His ability to diagnose plays quickly prevented several potential first downs.

Green Bay Team Defense

Statistic	Total
Total Tackles	60
Sacks	4
Tackles for Loss	3
Pass Deflections	8
Quarterback Hits	12

The most impressive figure was the 12 quarterback hits. Even when the Packers did not record a sack, they consistently forced Daniels to throw under pressure. That pressure reduced the effectiveness of Washington’s passing attack for much of the game.

The secondary also deserves credit. Eight pass deflections demonstrate how effectively Green Bay contested throws and limited opportunities for explosive completions.

Washington Commanders Defensive Leaders

Veteran linebacker Bobby Wagner once again showed why he remains one of the NFL’s most dependable defenders.

Player	Total Tackles	Solo Tackles
Bobby Wagner	11	3

Wagner finished with a game-high 11 tackles and frequently found himself cleaning up plays after Green Bay gained positive yardage. His leadership and football awareness kept Washington competitive even as the Packers controlled possession.

Washington Team Defense

Statistic	Total
Total Tackles	65
Sacks	2
Tackles for Loss	2
Pass Deflections	3
Quarterback Hits	4

Washington recorded more total tackles because Green Bay possessed the ball for longer stretches and ran more offensive plays. However, the Commanders generated only half as many sacks and one-third as many quarterback hits as the Packers.

That difference proved significant because Jordan Love generally operated from a clean pocket, giving him enough time to locate open receivers downfield.

Defensive Comparison

Category	Washington	Green Bay
Total Tackles	65	60
Sacks	2	4
Tackles for Loss	2	3
Quarterback Hits	4	12
Pass Deflections	3	8

While Washington made more tackles overall, Green Bay’s defense created considerably more disruption. The Packers consistently won at the line of scrimmage and prevented Washington from establishing offensive rhythm.

Special Teams Performance

Special teams often influence close NFL games, and this contest featured several valuable contributions from both sides.

Kick Returns

Washington

Player	Returns	Yards	Average	Long
Deebo Samuel	2	78	39.0	50

Samuel provided excellent field position with an impressive 50-yard return. His average of 39 yards per return was one of Washington’s brighter moments during the afternoon.

Green Bay

Player	Returns	Yards
Savion Williams	1	30

Although Green Bay had fewer return opportunities, Williams delivered solid starting field position with a 30-yard return.

Punt Returns

Washington

Player	Returns	Yards	Average
Jaylin Lane	3	50	16.7

Lane consistently gained positive yardage and helped Washington avoid poor field position.

Green Bay

Player	Returns	Yards
Keisean Nixon	2	3

Washington held the advantage in punt return production, but it was not enough to offset Green Bay’s stronger offensive performance.

Kicking Statistics

Washington Kicker

Matt Gay had a difficult afternoon.

Statistic	Value
Field Goals	1 of 3
Longest Field Goal	51 Yards
Extra Points	1 of 1
Total Points	4

Missing two field-goal attempts proved costly in a game ultimately decided by nine points.

Green Bay Kicker

Brandon McManus delivered a reliable performance.

Statistic	Value
Field Goals	2 of 3
Longest Field Goal	56 Yards
Extra Points	3 of 3
Total Points	9

McManus converted key scoring opportunities and added confidence to Green Bay’s special teams unit.

Punting Statistics

Washington

Player	Punts	Total Yards	Average	Long
Tress Way	4	187	46.8	55

Green Bay

Player	Punts	Total Yards	Average	Long
Daniel Whelan	4	213	53.3	55

Whelan averaged more than 53 yards per punt, consistently forcing Washington to begin drives deeper in its own territory.

Complete Team Comparison

Category	Washington Commanders	Green Bay Packers
Points	18	27
Passing Yards	200	292
Rushing Yards	51	135
Passing Touchdowns	2	2
Rushing Touchdowns	0	1
Sacks	2	4
Quarterback Hits	4	12
Pass Deflections	3	8
Field Goals Made	1	2
Turnovers	0	0

The numbers show that Green Bay outperformed Washington in nearly every major category. Better offensive balance, stronger pass protection, and more defensive pressure combined to produce a deserved victory.

Key Moments That Decided the Game

Several turning points shaped the outcome.

1. Green Bay’s fast start established a 7 to 0 lead in the opening quarter and forced Washington to play from behind.
2. Jordan Love’s connection with Tucker Kraft produced explosive gains that stretched Washington’s defense throughout the game.
3. Josh Jacobs’ consistent rushing production allowed Green Bay to control the clock and maintain offensive balance.
4. The Packers’ pass rush generated four sacks and twelve quarterback hits, disrupting Washington’s offensive rhythm.
5. Washington’s missed field goals reduced its chances of mounting a successful comeback.
6. Green Bay’s fourth-quarter response matched Washington’s late scoring surge, ensuring the visitors never came within one possession.

Player Grades

Player	Grade	Performance Summary
Jordan Love	A	Efficient passing, nearly 300 yards, two touchdowns, no turnovers.
Tucker Kraft	A	Game-leading 124 receiving yards and a touchdown.
Josh Jacobs	A-	Controlled the running game with 84 yards and one touchdown.
Edgerrin Cooper	A-	Defensive leader with 10 tackles and outstanding all-around play.
Jayden Daniels	B	Protected the football and threw two touchdowns but faced heavy pressure.
Bobby Wagner	B+	Led all defenders with 11 tackles and provided veteran leadership.
Zach Ertz	B+	Reliable receiving target with six catches and a touchdown.
Brandon McManus	A-	Converted key kicks, including a 56-yard field goal.

These performances explain why Green Bay improved to 2 and 0 while Washington dropped to an even record despite a determined finish.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the washington commanders vs green bay packers match player stats?

The game finished with Green Bay defeating Washington 27 to 18 on 12 September 2025. Jordan Love threw for 292 yards and two touchdowns, while Jayden Daniels recorded 200 passing yards and two touchdown passes. Josh Jacobs led all rushers with 84 yards and one touchdown, and Tucker Kraft finished with 124 receiving yards and one touchdown.

Who was the best player in the game?

Jordan Love was the standout performer. He completed 19 of 31 passes for 292 yards, threw two touchdowns without an interception, and posted a 113.9 passer rating. His efficient play helped Green Bay control the game from start to finish.

Why did the Packers beat the Commanders?

Green Bay won because it was more balanced offensively and more disruptive defensively. The Packers finished with 292 passing yards and 135 rushing yards while recording four sacks and 12 quarterback hits. Washington managed only 51 rushing yards and struggled to protect its quarterback consistently.

Who led the game in receiving yards?

Tucker Kraft led all receivers with six catches for 124 yards and one touchdown. His explosive plays gave Green Bay a consistent advantage throughout the game.

Did either team commit a turnover?

No. Both teams protected the football well. Neither side threw an interception or lost a fumble, making execution and efficiency the deciding factors instead of turnovers.

Conclusion

The washington commanders vs green bay packers match player stats illustrate why Green Bay earned a 27 to 18 victory despite Washington’s strong finish in the fourth quarter. The Packers controlled the contest through efficient quarterback play, a productive rushing attack, and a defense that consistently pressured Jayden Daniels without relying on takeaways.

Jordan Love delivered an excellent all around performance by throwing for 292 yards and two touchdowns, while Josh Jacobs provided balance with 84 rushing yards and a touchdown on 23 carries. Tucker Kraft emerged as the game’s biggest receiving threat, finishing with 124 yards and a score. Defensively, Edgerrin Cooper anchored a unit that produced four sacks, 12 quarterback hits, and eight pass deflections.

Washington had encouraging individual performances from Jayden Daniels, Bobby Wagner, Zach Ertz, and Deebo Samuel, but the inability to establish the running game and the missed field goal opportunities prevented the Commanders from closing the gap. The statistical comparison shows that Green Bay outperformed Washington in nearly every major offensive and defensive category, making the final result a fair reflection of how the game unfolded.