dallas cowboys vs las vegas raiders match player stats

Dallas Cowboys vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats

The dallas cowboys vs las vegas raiders match player stats from November 18, 2025, tell the story of a game that was far more one sided than the 33 to 16 final score initially suggests. Dallas controlled the most important parts of the contest, especially quarterback efficiency, explosive receiving, defensive pressure, and second quarter scoring. Dak Prescott completed 25 of 33 passes for 268 yards and four touchdowns without an interception, while George Pickens produced 144 receiving yards on nine catches. The Cowboys also held Las Vegas to only 27 rushing yards and 236 total yards, turning a competitive opening quarter into a decisive Dallas victory.

For readers searching for individual numbers rather than just the final score, this game offers plenty to examine. Prescott’s 138.6 passer rating stands out, but it does not tell the whole story. Pickens was the biggest yardage threat, CeeDee Lamb added a touchdown and 66 yards, Jake Ferguson scored another touchdown, and Dallas distributed all four of Prescott’s touchdown passes among four different pass catchers. On defense, the Cowboys generated four sacks, eight tackles for loss, eight passes defended, and 11 quarterback hits.

Las Vegas had its own productive performers. Brock Bowers caught seven passes for 72 yards on 12 targets, Tre Tucker scored the Raiders’ only receiving touchdown, and Geno Smith completed 27 of 42 attempts for 238 yards. However, Smith’s 77.3 passer rating and 17.2 QBR reflected the difficulty he faced against a Dallas defense that consistently created pressure.

The goal of this breakdown is not simply to repeat the box score. It is to explain what the numbers reveal about how the game unfolded, which players actually influenced the result, and why some statistics matter more than others when evaluating a performance.

Table of Contents

Dallas Cowboys vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats at a Glance

The game ended with Dallas ahead 33 to 16. The scoring pattern is important because the Cowboys did not dominate from the opening whistle.

Dallas scored 3 points in the first quarter, exploded for 21 in the second, added 7 in the third, and finished with 2 in the fourth. Las Vegas scored 6, 3, 0, and 7 respectively.

Category Dallas Cowboys Las Vegas Raiders
Final score 33 16
Passing yards 268 238
Passing touchdowns 4 1
Interceptions thrown 0 1
Rushing yards 114 27
Rushing attempts 31 12
Receiving yards 268 238
Receptions 25 27
Total sacks allowed 1 4
Team receiving TDs 4 1
Team rushing TDs 0 0
Third-down efficiency 4 of 10 3 of 12

The first major lesson is that Dallas won through balance and efficiency rather than overwhelming rushing production. The Cowboys averaged only 3.7 yards per rushing attempt, but they did not need the ground game to generate explosive scoring because Prescott repeatedly converted through the air.

Las Vegas, meanwhile, actually recorded more receptions than Dallas, 27 to 25, but that did not translate into a comparable offensive performance. The Raiders averaged 8.8 yards per reception compared with Dallas at 10.7, and their rushing attack produced only 2.3 yards per attempt.

That difference between volume and efficiency is one of the most useful ways to interpret this matchup.

Dak Prescott’s Passing Performance

Dak Prescott was the central figure in the Dallas offense.

He finished with:

  • 25 completions
  • 33 attempts
  • 268 passing yards
  • 8.1 yards per attempt
  • 4 touchdowns
  • 0 interceptions
  • 1 sack for 1 yard
  • 87.0 QBR
  • 138.6 passer rating

Those numbers represent a highly efficient quarterback performance. Prescott completed 75.8 percent of his passes, while averaging more than eight yards per attempt. The combination of accuracy, scoring production, and ball security explains why Dallas was able to build such a substantial lead.

The four touchdown passes are especially significant because they were distributed among four different receivers. ESPN reported that Prescott’s touchdown passes went to George Pickens, CeeDee Lamb, Jake Ferguson, and Ryan Flournoy.

That distribution made the Cowboys difficult to defend. A defense can sometimes limit an offense by concentrating coverage on one primary weapon. Dallas did not allow Las Vegas that luxury.

Why Prescott’s 138.6 passer rating matters

Passer rating is not a complete quarterback evaluation, but in this game it provides useful context.

Prescott combined a high completion rate with four touchdowns and no interceptions. His 8.1 yards per attempt also shows that Dallas was not simply throwing short passes to inflate completion numbers.

There is another important detail: Prescott was sacked only once.

That matters because the Raiders needed negative plays to disrupt Dallas drives. Instead, the Cowboys generally kept Prescott upright and gave him enough opportunities to exploit the secondary.

George Pickens Was Dallas’ Biggest Receiving Threat

George Pickens produced the most impressive receiving line in the game.

He recorded:

  • 9 receptions
  • 144 yards
  • 16.0 yards per reception
  • 1 touchdown
  • 37-yard long
  • 11 targets

The 144 yards accounted for more than half of Prescott’s passing yardage.

This was not simply a high-volume short-area performance. Pickens averaged 16 yards per catch, showing that Dallas was able to create meaningful gains downfield and in intermediate areas.

The 37-yard reception was his longest play, but the consistency of his production is arguably more important. Nine catches on 11 targets means Prescott repeatedly trusted him to win his matchup.

NFL reporting later highlighted Pickens’ broader 2025 emergence and noted that he had become one of the league’s leading receivers during the season.

Pickens’ target efficiency

Pickens received 11 of Dallas’ 32 team targets.

That is approximately 34.4 percent of the team’s targets.

Yet his nine receptions produced 144 yards. This is a strong example of why target share alone does not explain offensive value. A receiver can command a large percentage of targets while producing modest yardage. Pickens combined substantial opportunity with exceptional output.

For anyone studying the dallas cowboys vs las vegas raiders match player stats, Pickens is therefore one of the first numbers to examine.

CeeDee Lamb Added Another Layer

CeeDee Lamb finished with:

  • 5 receptions
  • 66 yards
  • 13.2 yards per reception
  • 1 touchdown
  • 23-yard long
  • 7 targets

Lamb did not lead Dallas in yardage, but his contribution was strategically important.

Five catches for 66 yards means he averaged 13.2 yards per reception. His touchdown also gave the Raiders another problem to solve in the red zone.

The most revealing point is that Dallas did not need Lamb to carry the entire passing attack. Pickens produced the largest yardage total while Lamb remained productive, and Prescott still found two additional touchdown scorers.

That is what a diversified passing attack looks like in a box score.

Jake Ferguson and Ryan Flournoy Complete the Touchdown Distribution

Jake Ferguson caught four passes for 16 yards and scored one touchdown.

His average of four yards per reception was modest, but touchdown production does not always require large yardage totals. Ferguson’s value came from converting an opportunity in scoring territory.

Ryan Flournoy also caught a touchdown pass. ESPN specifically noted that Prescott’s four touchdowns went to four different pass catchers.

That distribution is one of the clearest indicators of Dallas’ offensive execution.

A quarterback throwing four touchdowns to four different players suggests the offense was finding multiple favorable matchups instead of relying on a single route concept or receiver.

Dallas Rushing Statistics

Dallas rushed 31 times for 114 yards, an average of 3.7 yards per attempt.

The leading rusher was Javonte Williams:

  • 22 carries
  • 93 yards
  • 4.2 yards per carry
  • 16-yard long
  • 0 touchdowns

Williams handled the overwhelming majority of Dallas’ rushing workload.

Malik Davis added 20 yards on four attempts, while Hunter Luepke recorded five yards on one carry. Prescott carried four times for minus-four yards.

Why the rushing numbers still mattered

At first glance, 3.7 yards per carry does not look spectacular.

But Dallas did not need a highly explosive rushing attack to win. The rushing workload helped maintain offensive balance and prevented the Raiders from treating every snap as an obvious passing situation.

Williams’ 93 rushing yards also helped Dallas finish with 114 team rushing yards, compared with only 27 for Las Vegas.

That 87-yard difference was one of the defining statistical advantages of the game.

Las Vegas Raiders Passing Performance

Geno Smith completed 27 of 42 passes for 238 yards.

His complete line was:

  • 27 completions
  • 42 attempts
  • 238 yards
  • 5.7 yards per attempt
  • 1 touchdown
  • 1 interception
  • 4 sacks for 29 yards
  • 17.2 QBR
  • 77.3 passer rating

Smith’s completion percentage was 64.3 percent, which is respectable in isolation. The problem was what happened after those completions.

His 5.7 yards per attempt was significantly lower than Prescott’s 8.1.

The Raiders also allowed four sacks, and ESPN reported that Smith was pressured on 16 of 49 dropbacks.

That pressure changed the game.

A quarterback can complete a high percentage of passes and still struggle if the offense is constantly forced into low efficiency situations. That is effectively what happened to Las Vegas.

Brock Bowers Led the Raiders in Receiving

Brock Bowers was the Raiders’ leading receiver by yardage.

His numbers:

  • 7 receptions
  • 72 yards
  • 10.3 yards per reception
  • 0 touchdowns
  • 18-yard long
  • 12 targets

The 12 targets were the highest individual total for either team.

That tells us the Raiders repeatedly looked toward Bowers when they needed a reliable option.

However, his 72 yards represented only 6 yards per target.

That distinction is important.

Bowers was heavily involved, but Dallas limited the overall efficiency of that involvement. The Raiders could get the ball to their tight end, but they struggled to turn those opportunities into the kind of explosive gains required to keep pace with Dallas.

Tre Tucker Produced the Raiders’ Only Receiving Touchdown

Tre Tucker finished with:

  • 4 receptions
  • 47 yards
  • 11.8 yards per reception
  • 1 touchdown
  • 26-yard long
  • 8 targets

Tucker provided one of the few explosive elements in the Raiders passing game.

His 26-yard reception was the longest Las Vegas completion among the listed receiving leaders, and he was responsible for the Raiders’ lone receiving touchdown.

Still, the overall passing attack lacked the efficiency of Dallas.

The Raiders produced 238 passing yards, but needed 42 attempts to get there. Dallas reached 268 yards on only 33 attempts.

That is a major efficiency gap.

Ashton Jeanty’s Limited Rushing Production

Ashton Jeanty carried the ball six times for only seven yards.

That works out to 1.2 yards per carry.

His longest run was 11 yards, meaning the overall number was heavily affected by several unsuccessful attempts.

The Raiders’ entire rushing attack produced only 27 yards on 12 carries.

That is one of the strongest indicators of why Las Vegas struggled to sustain offensive balance.

ESPN subsequently examined why the Raiders moved away from the running game against Dallas, with the inability to establish the ground attack standing out as a major issue.

Dallas Defensive Statistics

The Dallas defense finished with:

  • 65 total tackles
  • 35 solo tackles
  • 4 sacks
  • 8 tackles for loss
  • 8 passes defended
  • 11 quarterback hits
  • 1 interception
  • 0 defensive touchdowns

DaRon Bland led Dallas with 10 total tackles and six solo tackles.

Markquese Bell recorded the interception, returning it 24 yards.

The most impressive defensive number, however, may have been the combination of sacks and quarterback hits.

Four sacks plus 11 quarterback hits shows that Dallas was not simply waiting for Smith to make mistakes. The defense was actively disrupting the pocket.

ESPN reported that the Raiders had only 236 total yards and that Smith faced significant pressure throughout the game.

The defensive pressure tells the story

If you only look at the interception column, Dallas had one and Las Vegas had none.

That is useful, but incomplete.

The Cowboys created four sacks and 11 quarterback hits. Las Vegas produced only one sack and four quarterback hits.

That 11 to 4 advantage is significant.

It indicates that Dallas consistently created more disruption at the line of scrimmage.

Las Vegas Defensive Statistics

The Raiders recorded:

  • 78 total tackles
  • 32 solo tackles
  • 1 sack
  • 2 tackles for loss
  • 3 passes defended
  • 4 quarterback hits
  • 0 interceptions
  • 0 defensive touchdowns

Devin White led the team with 10 total tackles.

Maxx Crosby recorded Las Vegas’ only sack.

The higher tackle total for Las Vegas should not be interpreted as evidence that its defense played better.

Tackles can increase when an opponent runs many successful plays and forces defenders to finish those plays downfield. Dallas generated 24 first downs compared with 17 for Las Vegas, while Dallas also produced seven rushing first downs and 16 passing first downs.

In other words, Las Vegas had plenty of tackling opportunities because Dallas was moving the football.

Third Down Was Another Important Difference

Dallas converted 4 of 10 third downs.

Las Vegas converted only 3 of 12.

Neither percentage is dominant, but the difference matters because third down often exposes whether an offense is consistently staying ahead of the chains.

Dallas converted 40 percent of its third downs.

Las Vegas converted only 25 percent.

That means the Raiders failed to extend drives at a high enough rate to compensate for their defensive struggles and weak rushing production.

Special Teams Player Stats

Special teams did not decide the game by themselves, but Dallas gained useful field-position production.

KaVontae Turpin returned four kickoffs for 111 yards, averaging 27.8 yards per return. His longest return was 39 yards.

He also returned one punt for 14 yards.

Las Vegas had Dylan Laube return four kickoffs for 94 yards and Raheem Mostert return two for 42 yards.

On punts, Tre Tucker returned two for only four yards.

Kicking comparison

Brandon Aubrey was perfect:

  • 1 of 1 field goals
  • 50-yard long
  • 4 of 4 extra points
  • 7 total points

Daniel Carlson was also perfect:

  • 3 of 3 field goals
  • 45-yard long
  • 1 of 1 extra points
  • 10 total points

Carlson actually scored more kicking points, but Dallas did not need as many field goals because its offense converted drives into touchdowns.

That is an important distinction when evaluating kicking statistics.

The Second Quarter Changed the Game

The first quarter ended with Las Vegas leading 6 to 3.

That makes the final result more revealing.

Dallas then scored 21 points in the second quarter while Las Vegas managed only three.

The Cowboys entered halftime ahead 24 to 9.

That 18-point swing effectively established the game’s direction.

ESPN’s game recap noted that Dallas scored on five consecutive possessions while building a 31 to 9 lead.

This is why looking only at the final score can miss the most important part of the contest.

Dallas did not gradually grind out a narrow win. The Cowboys created separation through a sustained offensive stretch and then controlled the game from a stronger position.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Dallas

The most useful way to interpret the numbers is to connect individual performances with team-level outcomes.

Prescott was efficient.

Pickens was explosive.

Lamb was productive.

Williams provided rushing volume.

The defense pressured Smith.

Turpin helped field position.

No single statistic explains the entire 17-point victory. Together, they form a consistent picture.

Dallas won because its passing game produced touchdowns without turnovers, its rushing game generated enough balance, and its defense prevented Las Vegas from creating a comparable offensive rhythm.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Las Vegas

The Raiders had some strong individual numbers, particularly from Bowers and Tucker.

But their production was fragmented.

Bowers received 12 targets but scored no touchdowns.

Smith completed 27 passes but averaged only 5.7 yards per attempt.

The Raiders rushed 12 times for 27 yards.

The defense recorded 78 tackles but only one sack.

This is the difference between accumulating statistics and producing winning efficiency.

Las Vegas had players who generated numbers, but Dallas generated the more valuable numbers.

Dallas Cowboys vs Las Vegas Raiders Match Player Stats: Biggest Winners

Dak Prescott

Prescott’s four touchdown passes and zero interceptions made him the most important offensive player.

His 138.6 passer rating was also the highest quarterback rating in the game.

George Pickens

Pickens was arguably the most dominant individual skill-position player.

His 144 yards on nine receptions gave Dallas a major explosive-play advantage.

Dallas Defensive Front

Four sacks, 11 quarterback hits, and eight tackles for loss demonstrate how effectively Dallas disrupted Las Vegas.

Javonte Williams

Williams did not score, but his 93 rushing yards on 22 carries gave Dallas a reliable rushing presence.

KaVontae Turpin

His 111 kickoff return yards created favorable field-position opportunities and helped Dallas avoid starting possessions in poor territory.

Las Vegas’ Most Notable Performers

Brock Bowers

Bowers led the Raiders with 72 receiving yards and 12 targets.

His involvement was obvious, even though Dallas prevented it from becoming a touchdown-producing performance.

Tre Tucker

Tucker provided 47 yards and the Raiders’ only receiving touchdown.

Devin White

White led the Raiders with 10 total tackles.

Daniel Carlson

Carlson converted all three field-goal attempts and the Raiders’ extra point.

The problem for Las Vegas was not that these players failed individually. The larger issue was that their contributions did not combine into enough sustained offensive production.

Why the 33 to 16 Score Makes Sense Statistically

The final score becomes easier to understand when several categories are viewed together.

Dallas had:

  • 268 passing yards
  • 114 rushing yards
  • 382 combined yards from those two categories
  • 4 passing touchdowns
  • 0 interceptions
  • 4 sacks generated
  • 11 quarterback hits
  • 24 first downs

Las Vegas had:

  • 238 passing yards
  • 27 rushing yards
  • 265 combined yards from those two categories
  • 1 passing touchdown
  • 1 interception
  • 1 sack generated
  • 4 quarterback hits
  • 17 first downs

Dallas therefore produced 117 more yards across passing and rushing.

The Cowboys also generated three more first downs, three more sacks, seven more quarterback hits, and three additional passing touchdowns.

Those differences explain the result much better than any single player statistic.

A Closer Look at Efficiency

Efficiency is often more informative than raw volume.

Dallas averaged:

  • 8.1 yards per pass attempt
  • 3.7 yards per rush
  • 10.7 yards per reception
  • 40 percent on third down

Las Vegas averaged:

  • 5.7 yards per pass attempt
  • 2.3 yards per rush
  • 8.8 yards per reception
  • 25 percent on third down

The contrast is clear.

Dallas was more efficient in the passing game, more effective on the ground, more productive per reception, and more successful on third down.

That is the statistical foundation of the victory.

How to Read These Player Stats Correctly

A common mistake when analyzing NFL box scores is to focus only on the player with the largest number.

For example, Bowers had 12 targets, which looks impressive. But targets are opportunities, not production by themselves.

Likewise, Las Vegas recorded 27 receptions compared with Dallas’ 25. That does not mean the Raiders’ passing game was better.

The better questions are:

  1. How many yards came from those opportunities?
  2. How often did the offense score?
  3. How many drives were sustained?
  4. Did the quarterback protect the football?
  5. Did the defense create pressure?
  6. Did the rushing game keep the offense balanced?
  7. Did the team convert third downs?

When those questions are applied to this game, Dallas consistently comes out ahead.

Real-World Takeaway for Fantasy Football Analysis

From a fantasy perspective, the game is particularly interesting because production was concentrated among a few Dallas players.

Prescott’s four touchdown passes made him the obvious quarterback standout.

Pickens’ 144 receiving yards and touchdown created an elite fantasy performance.

Lamb’s touchdown also gave him strong scoring value despite finishing behind Pickens in yardage.

Williams’ 93 rushing yards showed volume, but his lack of a touchdown limited the ceiling of his performance.

For Las Vegas, Bowers’ 12 targets made him highly relevant in PPR formats, although the absence of a touchdown limited his ceiling.

The broader lesson is that target volume is valuable, but it becomes significantly more valuable when paired with efficient quarterback play and red-zone production.

Why the Box Score Should Be Read With Game Context

Statistics are most useful when they answer a question.

Prescott’s four touchdowns answer the question of why Dallas scored 33 points.

Pickens’ 144 yards explain where much of the passing production came from.

The 114 rushing yards explain how Dallas maintained balance.

The four sacks and 11 quarterback hits explain why Geno Smith struggled to create efficient offense.

The 27 rushing yards explain why Las Vegas had difficulty maintaining balance.

The 21-point second quarter explains when Dallas created separation.

This approach is more useful than simply listing every player statistic without interpretation.

Final Assessment

The dallas cowboys vs las vegas raiders match player stats from November 18, 2025, show a game defined by Dallas’ efficiency.

Dak Prescott delivered the headline performance with 268 yards, four touchdown passes, no interceptions, and a 138.6 passer rating. George Pickens was the game’s leading receiving force with 144 yards and a touchdown. CeeDee Lamb added 66 yards and a score, while Jake Ferguson and Ryan Flournoy completed the four-touchdown distribution.

Javonte Williams provided 93 rushing yards, helping Dallas finish with 114 team rushing yards.

Defensively, the Cowboys created the pressure that Las Vegas could not match. Four sacks, 11 quarterback hits, eight tackles for loss, and an interception disrupted Geno Smith’s passing game. Smith still completed 27 passes, but the Raiders generated only 238 passing yards and 27 rushing yards.

Brock Bowers was Las Vegas’ leading receiver, while Tre Tucker produced the team’s only receiving touchdown. Daniel Carlson remained perfect on field goals and extra points. Yet those individual successes could not overcome the Raiders’ lack of rushing production, lower passing efficiency, and inability to consistently convert third downs.

Ultimately, the 33 to 16 score was supported by the underlying numbers. Dallas did not simply win because of a few spectacular plays. The Cowboys were better across the most important efficiency categories, especially passing effectiveness, rushing output, scoring conversion, quarterback protection, and defensive pressure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was the best player in the Dallas Cowboys vs Las Vegas Raiders game?

Dak Prescott was the most influential player statistically. He completed 25 of 33 passes for 268 yards and four touchdowns with no interceptions, producing a 138.6 passer rating. George Pickens was the standout receiving performer with 144 yards and one touchdown.

How many yards did George Pickens have against the Raiders?

George Pickens recorded 144 receiving yards on nine receptions from 11 targets. He averaged 16.0 yards per reception and caught one touchdown pass.

How did Dak Prescott perform against Las Vegas?

Prescott completed 25 of 33 passes for 268 yards, four touchdowns, and zero interceptions. He was sacked once and finished with a 138.6 passer rating and an 87.0 QBR.

How many rushing yards did the Raiders have?

Las Vegas rushed 12 times for only 27 yards, averaging 2.3 yards per attempt. Geno Smith led the Raiders in rushing with 14 yards, while Ashton Jeanty recorded seven yards on six carries.

Who led the Raiders in receiving?

Brock Bowers led Las Vegas with seven receptions for 72 yards on 12 targets. Tre Tucker was the Raiders’ only player to record a receiving touchdown.

How many sacks did Dallas record?

Dallas recorded four sacks. The defensive pressure was a major part of the Cowboys’ success, with the team also producing 11 quarterback hits and eight tackles for loss.

Conclusion

The dallas cowboys vs las vegas raiders match player stats provide a strong example of why NFL game analysis should go beyond the final score.

Dallas won 33 to 16 because the Cowboys combined efficient quarterback play with explosive receiving, useful rushing volume, and sustained defensive pressure. Prescott’s four touchdown passes were the headline statistic, but Pickens’ 144 receiving yards, Williams’ 93 rushing yards, and the defense’s four sacks were equally important pieces of the overall performance.

Las Vegas had productive individual players, particularly Bowers, Tucker, and Carlson, but the offense lacked balance. The Raiders managed only 27 rushing yards, averaged 5.7 yards per pass attempt, and converted just three of 12 third downs.

The clearest statistical difference was efficiency. Dallas turned fewer passing attempts into more passing yards, generated far more rushing production, scored four passing touchdowns without throwing an interception, and consistently pressured the opposing quarterback.

For anyone studying this matchup, the most useful takeaway is simple: the box score becomes much more meaningful when individual numbers are connected to team performance. Prescott’s efficiency, Pickens’ explosiveness, Dallas’ rushing advantage, and the Cowboys’ defensive pressure all point toward the same conclusion. Dallas controlled the game in the areas that most directly influence winning football.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *