Los Angeles Rams vs 49ers Match Player Stats
The los angeles rams vs 49ers match player stats tell the story of one of the most competitive NFL games of the 2025 season. Played on 3 October 2025, the San Francisco 49ers edged the Los Angeles Rams 26-23 in overtime, improving to 4-1 while the Rams fell to 3-2. Although the final score was separated by just three points, the statistics reveal why the contest remained balanced from kickoff until the decisive overtime field goal. Quarterback performances, turnover margin, defensive stops, and special teams all played significant roles in determining the outcome.
From years of analyzing NFL games, I have found that close divisional matchups are rarely decided by total offensive yards alone. Instead, the winning team usually excels in situational football. This game perfectly illustrates that principle. The Rams generated more passing yards and threw more touchdown passes, but San Francisco protected the football, capitalized on turnovers, and received flawless kicking from Eddy Pineiro. Those small advantages ultimately proved decisive.
Los Angeles Rams vs 49ers Match Player Stats: Complete Game Overview
The NFC West rivalry once again delivered an exciting contest that remained uncertain until overtime. Both teams traded momentum throughout four quarters before San Francisco secured the victory with a game-winning field goal.
Match Summary
| Category | Result |
| Competition | NFL |
| Date | 3 October 2025 |
| Venue | Rams Home Stadium |
| Final Score | San Francisco 49ers 26, Los Angeles Rams 23 (OT) |
| Winner | San Francisco 49ers |
| 49ers Record After Game | 4-1 |
| Rams Record After Game | 3-2 |
Quarter-by-Quarter Score
| Quarter | 49ers | Rams |
| First Quarter | 7 | 0 |
| Second Quarter | 10 | 7 |
| Third Quarter | 3 | 7 |
| Fourth Quarter | 3 | 9 |
| Overtime | 3 | 0 |
| Final | 26 | 23 |
San Francisco established an early lead, but Los Angeles gradually erased the deficit during the second half. Neither team committed an interception, making every possession valuable. The decisive difference came when the 49ers recovered both Rams fumbles and converted those opportunities into points.
How the Game Unfolded
First Quarter
The 49ers controlled the opening period with efficient offensive execution. Mac Jones completed several key passes while the defense prevented the Rams from finding offensive rhythm. San Francisco finished the quarter ahead 7-0 after limiting Los Angeles to minimal production.
Second Quarter
Both offenses became more aggressive. Matthew Stafford began stretching the field, while Mac Jones consistently moved the chains with accurate intermediate throws. By halftime, San Francisco maintained a 17-7 advantage.
Third Quarter
The Rams adjusted offensively by attacking through Stafford and his receivers. Their passing attack generated explosive gains, reducing the deficit while the 49ers managed only one field goal.
Fourth Quarter
Los Angeles continued its comeback, scoring nine points to force overtime. Stafford repeatedly found open targets, but San Francisco’s defense delivered timely stops when the Rams approached scoring position.
Overtime
After both teams battled for four quarters, the 49ers maintained possession long enough to set up Eddy Pineiro for the game-winning field goal. His perfect kicking performance sealed the 26-23 victory.
Quarterback Comparison
Quarterback play dominated the headlines after the game because both passers delivered impressive performances despite facing consistent defensive pressure.
Mac Jones Performance
Mac Jones quietly produced one of his strongest statistical games of the season.
| Statistic | Value |
| Completions/Attempts | 33/49 |
| Passing Yards | 342 |
| Average Per Attempt | 7.0 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| QBR | 67.4 |
| Passer Rating | 100.9 |
Jones demonstrated patience throughout the evening. Instead of forcing difficult throws, he consistently took what the Rams defense allowed. His zero-interception performance proved especially valuable in a tightly contested divisional matchup.
Several third-down completions extended drives and kept San Francisco’s offense on schedule. His chemistry with Kendrick Bourne was particularly noticeable, as the receiver repeatedly created separation against the Rams secondary.
Matthew Stafford Performance
Matthew Stafford arguably posted even more impressive passing numbers.
| Statistic | Value |
| Completions/Attempts | 30/47 |
| Passing Yards | 389 |
| Average Per Attempt | 8.3 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| QBR | 55.8 |
| Passer Rating | 111.0 |
Stafford attacked vertically throughout the contest, producing nearly 400 passing yards and three touchdowns. His accuracy remained outstanding, especially on intermediate and deep routes.
Despite those excellent numbers, football games are decided by more than quarterback statistics. The Rams lost two critical fumbles, and those turnovers outweighed Stafford’s remarkable passing production.
Passing Leaders Analysis
The passing battle highlighted two different offensive philosophies.
San Francisco relied on sustained drives built around consistent completions, while Los Angeles emphasized explosive passing plays that generated larger chunks of yardage.
Key comparisons include:
- Stafford threw for 389 yards.
- Jones finished with 342 passing yards.
- Stafford averaged 8.3 yards per attempt.
- Jones averaged 7.0 yards per attempt.
- Neither quarterback threw an interception.
- Both quarterbacks were sacked only once.
Although Stafford produced superior passing statistics, Jones managed the game efficiently while avoiding costly mistakes. That balance helped San Francisco control critical moments.
Rushing Performance Breakdown
Neither running game dominated, but both teams relied on their lead backs during important situations.
Christian McCaffrey
| Statistic | Value |
| Carries | 22 |
| Rushing Yards | 57 |
| Average | 2.6 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long Run | 8 |
McCaffrey encountered a disciplined Rams defensive front throughout the evening. His average of just 2.6 yards per carry reflected how effectively Los Angeles limited inside running lanes.
Even though the rushing numbers were modest, McCaffrey remained valuable by keeping the offense balanced and helping control possession.
Kyren Williams
| Statistic | Value |
| Carries | 14 |
| Rushing Yards | 65 |
| Average | 4.6 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long Run | 20 |
Williams generated better efficiency than McCaffrey, averaging nearly five yards per carry. His longest run of 20 yards helped extend one of the Rams’ scoring drives during the second half.
Team Rushing Comparison
| Team | Carries | Yards | Average |
| 49ers | 33 | 74 | 2.2 |
| Rams | 16 | 78 | 4.9 |
Although the Rams averaged more yards per rushing attempt, San Francisco committed to the ground game more consistently. That commitment helped maintain offensive balance even when rushing lanes disappeared.
Receiving Leaders
Wide receivers played a massive role in keeping both offenses productive.
Kendrick Bourne
Bourne emerged as Mac Jones’ favorite target.
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 10 |
| Receiving Yards | 142 |
| Average | 14.2 |
| Targets | 11 |
| Long Reception | 35 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
His ability to consistently move the chains made him one of the most influential players on the field. Several receptions came during long scoring drives that shifted momentum toward San Francisco.
Davante Adams
Adams delivered explosive gains whenever Stafford looked his direction.
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 5 |
| Receiving Yards | 88 |
| Average | 17.6 |
| Targets | 11 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
Although he finished without a touchdown, Adams stretched the defense and created opportunities for teammates underneath.
Puka Nacua
Nacua continued to prove why he remains one of the NFL’s most dependable receivers.
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 10 |
| Receiving Yards | 85 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
His touchdown reception helped the Rams erase much of San Francisco’s earlier lead and energized the home crowd.
Defensive Performance Breakdown
Defense often determines the outcome of close NFL games, and this matchup was no exception. While both offenses generated impressive passing numbers, the defenses made several crucial plays that shaped the final result. The most significant defensive statistic was San Francisco’s ability to recover both Rams fumbles while committing no turnovers themselves.
San Francisco 49ers Defensive Statistics
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Tackles | 65 |
| Solo Tackles | 33 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 1 |
| Passes Defended | 4 |
| Quarterback Hits | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Fumble Recoveries | 2 |
The 49ers defense may not have overwhelmed the Rams with sacks or turnovers through the air, but it excelled in the moments that mattered most. Recovering two fumbles changed the direction of the game and ultimately gave San Francisco the edge.
Marques Sigle Leads the Defense
Marques Sigle delivered an outstanding all-around performance.
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Tackles | 13 |
| Solo Tackles | 7 |
Sigle consistently diagnosed plays quickly and limited yards after contact. His ability to support both the run defense and pass coverage made him one of the most impactful defenders on the field.
Los Angeles Rams Defensive Statistics
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Tackles | 89 |
| Solo Tackles | 51 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 3 |
| Passes Defended | 5 |
| Quarterback Hits | 10 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Fumble Recoveries | 0 |
The Rams defense spent more time on the field, which explains the higher tackle total. Their pass rush consistently pressured Mac Jones, recording ten quarterback hits, but they could not force the game-changing turnover they needed.
Nate Landman Anchors the Rams Defense
Nate Landman was everywhere during the game.
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Tackles | 14 |
| Solo Tackles | 8 |
Landman repeatedly stopped short gains and limited additional yardage after catches. His tackling consistency kept the Rams competitive throughout four quarters.
Turnovers That Changed the Game
One of the clearest lessons from the los angeles rams vs 49ers match player stats is that turnover margin often outweighs total offensive production.
Turnover Summary
| Category | 49ers | Rams |
| Fumbles | 0 | 2 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 2 |
| Fumble Recoveries | 2 | 0 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions Made | 0 | 0 |
| Turnover Differential | +2 | -2 |
Although the Rams produced more passing yards and more touchdown passes, losing two fumbles proved costly.
From an analytical perspective, turnover differential is one of the strongest indicators of winning in the NFL. San Francisco protected the football from start to finish, while Los Angeles gave away two valuable possessions. Those extra opportunities allowed the 49ers to maintain scoreboard pressure even when their running game struggled.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams quietly became one of the deciding factors in overtime.
Eddy Pineiro Delivers a Perfect Night
| Statistic | Value |
| Field Goals | 4/4 |
| Longest Field Goal | 59 Yards |
| Extra Points | 2/2 |
| Total Points | 14 |
Pineiro converted every kick, including an impressive 59-yard field goal. His consistency gave San Francisco confidence to take points whenever drives stalled.
More importantly, he remained composed under overtime pressure, converting the game-winning kick to complete a flawless performance.
Joshua Karty’s Night
| Statistic | Value |
| Field Goals | 1/2 |
| Longest Field Goal | 48 Yards |
| Extra Points | 2/3 |
| Total Points | 5 |
Karty contributed valuable points, but the missed field goal and missed extra point ultimately became significant in a game decided by only three points.
Kick Return Comparison
Field position influenced several offensive drives throughout the game.
San Francisco Kick Returns
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Returns | 4 |
| Return Yards | 73 |
| Average | 18.3 |
Skyy Moore led the return unit with three kick returns for 55 yards.
Los Angeles Kick Returns
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Returns | 5 |
| Return Yards | 122 |
| Average | 24.4 |
Xavier Smith provided an excellent spark, totaling 122 return yards and consistently giving the Rams favorable starting field position.
Punting Statistics
Both punters performed well despite limited opportunities.
Thomas Morstead
| Statistic | Value |
| Punts | 4 |
| Total Yards | 168 |
| Average | 42.0 |
| Longest Punt | 50 |
Ethan Evans
| Statistic | Value |
| Punts | 2 |
| Total Yards | 110 |
| Average | 55.0 |
| Longest Punt | 59 |
Evans averaged more yards per punt, but Morstead’s consistency helped San Francisco win the field-position battle during critical stretches.
Complete Offensive Leaders
San Francisco 49ers
| Player | Performance |
| Mac Jones | 342 Passing Yards, 2 TD |
| Kendrick Bourne | 10 Receptions, 142 Yards |
| Christian McCaffrey | 57 Rushing Yards |
Los Angeles Rams
| Player | Performance |
| Matthew Stafford | 389 Passing Yards, 3 TD |
| Davante Adams | 88 Receiving Yards |
| Puka Nacua | 10 Receptions, 85 Yards, 1 TD |
| Kyren Williams | 65 Rushing Yards |
Why the 49ers Won Despite Lower Passing Numbers
At first glance, the Rams appeared to have the stronger offensive performance. Stafford threw for more yards, completed more explosive passes, and finished with three touchdown throws.
However, football is rarely decided by one statistical category. Several factors explain San Francisco’s victory.
Ball Security
The 49ers never turned the football over.
Turnover Margin
Recovering two Rams fumbles provided additional possessions that directly influenced the final score.
Reliable Kicking
Eddy Pineiro converted every scoring opportunity available, including the overtime winner.
Situational Football
San Francisco consistently executed during important third downs and managed the clock effectively late in the game.
Composure Under Pressure
When overtime began, the 49ers remained disciplined and avoided mistakes, allowing them to finish the game with confidence.
These details demonstrate why evaluating only passing yards can lead to misleading conclusions.
Team Comparison
| Category | 49ers | Rams |
| Final Score | 26 | 23 |
| Passing Leader | Mac Jones, 342 Yards | Matthew Stafford, 389 Yards |
| Passing TD | 2 | 3 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Team Rushing | 74 Yards | 78 Yards |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 2 |
| Field Goals Made | 4 | 1 |
| Total Turnovers | 0 | 2 |
| Overtime Points | 3 | 0 |
Individual Player Grades
These grades are based on overall impact rather than raw statistics alone.
| Player | Grade | Reason |
| Mac Jones | A | Efficient decision-making and two touchdown passes without a turnover. |
| Matthew Stafford | A | Outstanding production through the air despite the loss. |
| Kendrick Bourne | A | Dominated as the primary receiving threat with 142 yards. |
| Christian McCaffrey | B | Limited rushing average but contributed to offensive balance. |
| Kyren Williams | B+ | Strong rushing efficiency and several important first downs. |
| Davante Adams | B+ | Created explosive plays that stretched the defense. |
| Puka Nacua | A- | Reliable target with ten catches and a touchdown. |
| Marques Sigle | A | Defensive leader who consistently finished plays. |
| Nate Landman | A | Outstanding tackling performance throughout the contest. |
| Eddy Pineiro | A+ | Perfect kicking performance and overtime game winner. |
Key Takeaways from the Match
The statistics from this game provide several important lessons.
- Protecting the football remains one of the strongest predictors of victory.
- Passing yards alone do not determine NFL outcomes.
- Reliable special teams can decide close divisional games.
- Defensive takeaways often outweigh offensive explosiveness.
- Overtime rewards disciplined teams that avoid costly mistakes.
The los angeles rams vs 49ers match player stats clearly illustrate how complementary football leads to success. San Francisco combined efficient quarterback play, opportunistic defense, and flawless kicking to overcome a Rams offense that generated more passing production.
Advanced Statistical Insights
Looking beyond the traditional box score provides a clearer understanding of why San Francisco secured the victory. The raw passing numbers favor the Rams, but several advanced performance indicators explain the final outcome.
Quarterback Efficiency
Matthew Stafford finished with more passing yards and a higher passer rating, demonstrating his ability to generate explosive plays. However, Mac Jones maintained excellent efficiency by completing timely passes, protecting the football, and extending drives when his team needed points.
This matchup shows that quarterback success is measured by more than total yards. Decision-making, ball security, and execution during critical possessions often have a greater impact on the final result.
Turnover Margin Was the Deciding Statistic
The single most important number from this game was the turnover differential.
- 49ers turnover differential: +2
- Rams turnover differential: -2
San Francisco recovered both Rams fumbles while committing no turnovers. Those extra possessions helped offset the Rams’ advantage in passing production.
Special Teams Made the Difference
Close NFL games frequently come down to kicking efficiency, and this matchup reinforced that point.
Eddy Pineiro converted all four field-goal attempts, including a 59-yard kick and the game-winning overtime field goal. Joshua Karty, meanwhile, missed one field goal and one extra point. In a game decided by only three points, every missed scoring opportunity proved costly.
Offensive Balance
Neither team dominated on the ground, but both continued running the football enough to prevent the defense from focusing entirely on the passing game.
Although Christian McCaffrey averaged only 2.6 yards per carry, his workload helped keep the offense balanced. Kyren Williams produced a better average per carry, but the Rams relied primarily on Stafford’s arm throughout the contest.
Defensive Discipline
Neither defense intercepted a pass, which highlights the quality of quarterback play on both sides. Instead, defensive success came through tackling, limiting explosive rushing plays, and creating fumbles.
San Francisco’s ability to capitalize on those fumbles ultimately separated the two teams.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. Who won the Los Angeles Rams vs 49ers game on 3 October 2025?
The San Francisco 49ers defeated the Los Angeles Rams 26-23 in overtime, improving their season record to 4-1.
2. Who had the most passing yards in the game?
Matthew Stafford led all quarterbacks with 389 passing yards, three touchdown passes, no interceptions, and a 111.0 passer rating.
3. Who was the leading receiver?
Kendrick Bourne led all receivers with 10 catches for 142 yards, making him the most productive pass catcher in the game.
4. Why did the 49ers win despite fewer passing yards?
San Francisco protected the football, recovered two Rams fumbles, received perfect kicking from Eddy Pineiro, and executed better during crucial moments, especially in overtime.
5. Who scored the game-winning points?
Eddy Pineiro kicked the game-winning field goal in overtime after completing a perfect 4-for-4 performance on field-goal attempts.
Conclusion
The los angeles rams vs 49ers match player stats highlight just how competitive this NFC West rivalry continues to be. Although Matthew Stafford produced one of the strongest passing performances of the week with 389 yards and three touchdowns, football remains a team game where efficiency often outweighs raw production.
San Francisco combined disciplined quarterback play from Mac Jones, outstanding receiving from Kendrick Bourne, timely defensive takeaways, and flawless special teams execution to secure a hard-earned 26-23 overtime victory. The Rams displayed explosive offensive potential throughout the contest, but two lost fumbles and missed kicking opportunities ultimately proved too much to overcome.
For analysts, coaches, and football fans, this game serves as another reminder that winning close NFL matchups depends on minimizing mistakes, maximizing scoring opportunities, and executing under pressure. Every possession mattered, and the 49ers consistently made the critical plays that determined the final outcome.
