Orlando Magic vs 76ers Match Player Stats
The orlando magic vs 76ers match player stats from the 2026 NBA Play-In Tournament tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. Philadelphia defeated Orlando 109-97 at Xfinity Mobile Arena, using a stronger fourth quarter, better three-point shooting, superior free-throw accuracy, and a more efficient offensive performance to secure the Eastern Conference’s No. 7 seed. Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 31 points and 6 assists, while Desmond Bane produced 34 points for Orlando in a losing effort. The official NBA record lists the game as Wednesday, April 15, 2026, even though NBA coverage and reporting appeared on April 16.
This game is especially interesting because the basic scoring totals do not fully explain why Philadelphia controlled the decisive moments. Orlando actually finished with more points in the paint, 44 to 38, and Wendell Carter Jr. collected 11 rebounds. Yet Philadelphia made 12 three-pointers compared with Orlando’s 7, converted 84% of its free throws, committed three fewer turnovers, and blocked nine shots. Those small advantages accumulated into a 12-point victory.
For readers researching the orlando magic vs 76ers match player stats, the most useful approach is therefore to examine the individual performances alongside the team numbers. That reveals which players actually drove the result, where Orlando lost efficiency, and why Maxey’s production mattered so much in a high-pressure Play-In setting.
Orlando Magic vs 76ers Match Player Stats
The headline numbers immediately identify the leading performers.
| Category | Orlando Magic | Philadelphia 76ers |
| Final score | 97 | 109 |
| Field goals | 33-81 | 38-85 |
| Field-goal percentage | 41% | 45% |
| Three-pointers | 7-27 | 12-35 |
| Three-point percentage | 26% | 34% |
| Free throws | 24-31 | 21-25 |
| Free-throw percentage | 77% | 84% |
| Rebounds | 41 | 40 |
| Assists | 19 | 17 |
| Turnovers | 14 | 11 |
| Steals | 5 | 8 |
| Blocks | 4 | 9 |
The official NBA box score confirms the 109-97 result and provides the individual player statistics behind these team totals.
Orlando’s leading performers
Desmond Bane was Orlando’s top scorer with 34 points. That was the clearest individual scoring performance of the game, and it kept the Magic competitive despite Philadelphia’s stronger overall efficiency.
Wendell Carter Jr. led Orlando in rebounding with 11 boards, giving the Magic a strong presence on the glass.
Paolo Banchero and Jalen Suggs each recorded 4 assists, making them Orlando’s joint assist leaders.
Franz Wagner finished with the team’s best plus/minus at +1, which is notable because Orlando lost by 12 points. His positive plus/minus indicates that his minutes were comparatively productive even though the team struggled to close the game.
Philadelphia’s leading performers
Tyrese Maxey was Philadelphia’s offensive centerpiece. He finished with 31 points and 6 assists, giving the 76ers a high-volume creator who could both score and organize the offense.
VJ Edgecombe produced 19 points and 11 rebounds, giving Philadelphia a valuable two-way contribution. The 11 rebounds tied Wendell Carter Jr. for the game high.
Kelly Oubre Jr. scored 19 points and posted Philadelphia’s best plus/minus at +19. That plus/minus figure stands out because it reflects the team’s overall performance during his minutes rather than just his scoring total.
Paul George added 16 points, while Andre Drummond contributed 14 points and 10 rebounds off the bench. The NBA’s official recap also notes that Drummond helped fill the frontcourt void created by Joel Embiid’s absence.
What the Final Score Really Tells Us
Philadelphia’s 109-97 victory was not built around one statistical category. It was the result of several modest advantages working together.
The first major difference was shooting efficiency.
Philadelphia made 38 of 85 field-goal attempts, good for roughly 45%. Orlando made 33 of 81, or about 41%. That four-percentage-point difference may look small, but across more than 80 attempts it represents several additional made baskets.
The three-point gap was even more important.
Philadelphia made 12 of 35 three-point attempts. Orlando made only 7 of 27. That produced a 15-point advantage from beyond the arc.
This matters because Orlando’s overall field-goal percentage was not disastrous. The Magic were simply less effective at generating efficient scoring opportunities from three-point range.
Free throws also favored Philadelphia. The 76ers converted 21 of 25 attempts for 84%, while Orlando went 24 of 31 for 77%. Orlando actually attempted six more free throws, but Philadelphia’s accuracy helped reduce the value of that advantage.
Turnovers added another layer. Orlando gave the ball away 14 times, compared with 11 for Philadelphia. Those extra possessions mattered in a Play-In game where each empty possession can change momentum.
The result was a game in which Philadelphia did not need to dominate every statistical category. It simply needed to win enough of the important efficiency categories.
Desmond Bane’s 34 Points Were Not Enough
The most striking individual statistic from Orlando was Desmond Bane’s 34 points.
A 34-point performance would normally put a team in an excellent position to win. Yet basketball is not decided by the highest individual scoring total. The surrounding efficiency and supporting production matter just as much.
Bane gave Orlando a reliable scoring option throughout the contest, but Philadelphia had multiple players contributing meaningful production. Maxey led the Sixers with 31, Oubre Jr. added 19, George scored 16, and Drummond supplied 14.
That distribution made Philadelphia harder to contain.
Orlando’s offensive burden was more concentrated. When Bane was producing, the Magic had a clear scoring engine. But Philadelphia could respond through several different players.
This is one of the most useful lessons when reading orlando magic vs 76ers match player stats. The highest-scoring player is not automatically the game’s most influential player.
Bane’s 34 points were outstanding individually. Maxey’s 31 points, however, came within a Philadelphia offense that also received substantial contributions from Oubre, George, Edgecombe, and Drummond.
Tyrese Maxey Controlled the Game’s Offensive Pressure
Maxey’s 31 points were the most important scoring contribution for Philadelphia.
His value went beyond the raw number.
He also recorded 6 assists, making him the game’s most productive combination of scoring and playmaking. When a primary guard can create his own offense while also generating opportunities for teammates, opposing defenses face a difficult choice.
If Orlando committed additional attention to Maxey, Philadelphia had other scoring options.
If Orlando stayed home on shooters and secondary scorers, Maxey could attack.
That balance is a major reason why his performance translated so effectively into a team victory.
The official NBA recap identified Maxey’s 31-point performance as the key factor in Philadelphia’s Play-In win.
VJ Edgecombe’s Rebounding Impact
VJ Edgecombe’s 11 rebounds deserve more attention than they might receive from a standard scoring-focused box-score review.
He matched Carter Jr.’s game-leading rebound total while also scoring 19 points.
That combination gave Philadelphia additional possessions and helped compensate for the absence of Joel Embiid.
Edgecombe’s performance illustrates why player evaluation should not focus solely on points. A 19-point, 11-rebound performance in a Play-In game can have a major effect on possession control.
The official NBA recap specifically highlighted Edgecombe’s 19 points and 11 rebounds.
His contribution was especially valuable because Philadelphia finished with 40 total rebounds, just one fewer than Orlando’s 41. Orlando did not dominate the glass despite having Carter Jr. collect 11 boards.
Wendell Carter Jr. Provided Orlando’s Interior Strength
Carter Jr. led Orlando with 11 rebounds.
That was one of the Magic’s strongest individual contributions because it helped keep the overall rebounding battle nearly even.
Orlando finished with 41 rebounds to Philadelphia’s 40.
That statistic is important because it eliminates one possible explanation for the loss. The Magic were not simply beaten because they could not rebound.
Instead, the decisive differences were more closely connected to shooting, turnovers, defensive plays, and fourth-quarter execution.
Carter Jr.’s rebounding performance therefore stands as an example of a positive individual contribution inside a team loss.
Paolo Banchero’s Mixed Statistical Night
Paolo Banchero finished with 18 points, 5 rebounds, and 4 assists, according to the official NBA box score. He also faced significant shooting difficulty, making 7 of 22 field-goal attempts.
That is one of the more revealing numbers in the game.
Banchero attempted 22 shots, more than any other Orlando player, but his 31.8% field-goal percentage meant Orlando did not receive efficient production from one of its primary offensive creators.
His four assists were useful, and his five rebounds added value. However, his six turnovers were costly.
This is where a deeper reading of player statistics becomes important.
A player can contribute 18 points, 5 rebounds, and 4 assists while still having an inefficient overall offensive night. The box score needs to be interpreted as a collection of connected events rather than a list of isolated achievements.
Banchero’s workload was clearly significant, but Philadelphia made that workload difficult to convert into efficient scoring.
Franz Wagner’s Efficient Contribution
Franz Wagner was one of Orlando’s more efficient starters.
He scored 12 points on 5-of-11 shooting and added 4 rebounds and 3 assists. He also recorded the Magic’s best plus/minus at +1.
His shooting percentage was 45.5%, which was better than Banchero’s mark.
The interesting part is that Wagner’s individual numbers were not spectacular, but his overall contribution was comparatively steady.
This is exactly why plus/minus should be used carefully but not ignored.
A +1 rating does not mean Wagner single-handedly outplayed every Philadelphia player. It simply indicates that Orlando’s scoring margin was slightly positive during his time on the floor.
In a game Orlando lost by 12, that makes Wagner’s on-court impact particularly interesting.
Jalen Suggs and Orlando’s Playmaking
Jalen Suggs was one of Orlando’s starting guards and shared the team assist lead with Banchero at four assists.
For Orlando to generate more efficient offense, the Magic needed its perimeter players to create advantages without forcing Banchero and Bane to carry such a heavy scoring burden.
The team’s final total of 19 assists indicates that Orlando did move the ball, but the distribution of scoring opportunities was not efficient enough.
Philadelphia actually recorded fewer assists, 17, yet scored 12 more points.
That is a useful reminder that assist totals alone do not determine offensive quality.
The 76ers were simply more efficient with their possessions.
The Fourth Quarter Decided the Game
The most important team-level statistic may be the fourth-quarter scoring.
Orlando scored:
- First quarter: 24
- Second quarter: 31
- Third quarter: 19
- Fourth quarter: 23
Philadelphia scored:
- First quarter: 28
- Second quarter: 31
- Third quarter: 20
- Fourth quarter: 30
The game was therefore relatively competitive through three quarters.
Philadelphia entered the final period with a manageable advantage and then created separation by outscoring Orlando 30-23 in the fourth.
That seven-point fourth-quarter difference increased the final margin to 12.
This is significant because the game was not simply decided in the opening minutes. Orlando had opportunities to remain within striking distance, but Philadelphia finished with greater offensive efficiency.
The official NBA game summary confirms the quarter-by-quarter progression of 28-24, 31-31, 20-19, and 30-23 in Philadelphia’s favor.
Why Philadelphia’s Three-Point Shooting Mattered
Philadelphia’s 12 made three-pointers were one of the clearest statistical advantages.
Orlando made seven.
That five-shot difference translated into 15 additional points from three-point range.
Even though Orlando attempted 27 threes and Philadelphia attempted 35, Philadelphia made five more.
That suggests two things.
First, Philadelphia generated more successful perimeter opportunities.
Second, Philadelphia’s shooters converted at a higher rate.
The 76ers shot 34% from three-point range compared with Orlando’s 26%.
For a team trying to survive a single-elimination Play-In environment, that kind of difference can be decisive.
Orlando Actually Won Some Important Categories
A fair analysis should not turn the game into a simple story of Philadelphia dominating everything.
Orlando had several statistical advantages.
The Magic:
- Scored 44 points in the paint.
- Collected 41 rebounds.
- Recorded 19 assists.
- Attempted 31 free throws.
- Scored 15 fast-break points.
Philadelphia:
- Scored 38 points in the paint.
- Collected 40 rebounds.
- Recorded 17 assists.
- Attempted 25 free throws.
- Scored 12 fast-break points.
These numbers show that Orlando did many things reasonably well.
The problem was that those advantages did not compensate for Philadelphia’s shooting efficiency, ball security, defensive disruption, and fourth-quarter scoring.
That distinction is important for anyone studying player statistics rather than simply looking at the final result.
Philadelphia’s Defense Created Extra Value
The defensive numbers strongly favored Philadelphia.
The 76ers recorded:
- 8 steals
- 9 blocks
Orlando recorded:
- 5 steals
- 4 blocks
The block difference was particularly large.
Philadelphia produced five more blocks than Orlando, which can alter shot selection even when a blocked shot does not directly result in a turnover.
The Sixers also forced Orlando into 14 turnovers while committing only 11 themselves.
That created a three-possession advantage in turnover margin.
Philadelphia’s defensive activity therefore complemented its shooting.
This combination is more meaningful than either category alone. Efficient offense can win games, but efficient offense combined with disruptive defense is much harder for an opponent to overcome.
Kelly Oubre Jr. Had the Best Plus/Minus
Kelly Oubre Jr.’s +19 plus/minus was the best mark among the players highlighted in the supplied game data.
He scored 19 points and played an important role in Philadelphia’s overall control of the game.
The +19 number should not be treated as a standalone measure of individual quality. Plus/minus is heavily influenced by teammates, opponents, lineup combinations, and game context.
However, when it aligns with a productive scoring performance and a team victory, it becomes a useful supporting indicator.
Oubre’s contribution was particularly valuable because Philadelphia did not need to rely exclusively on Maxey.
That secondary production helped prevent Orlando from concentrating its defensive resources on one player.
The Role of Paul George
Paul George scored 16 points and was one of Philadelphia’s starters.
His importance was not simply tied to the final point total.
The official game recap describes a third-quarter fadeaway from George that extended Philadelphia’s lead and helped trigger an Orlando timeout.
That sequence illustrates a broader point about high-pressure basketball.
Some possessions matter because they stop an opponent’s momentum.
A timely shot from an experienced scorer can have greater practical importance than a similar basket scored during a low-pressure stretch.
George’s 16 points therefore need to be viewed within the game’s rhythm rather than compared only against Bane’s 34.
Andre Drummond’s Double-Double
Andre Drummond produced 14 points and 10 rebounds off the bench.
That double-double was one of Philadelphia’s most important supporting performances.
The official NBA recap specifically noted that Drummond filled the frontcourt role created by Embiid’s absence.
His contribution also helped Philadelphia maintain a strong interior presence without needing Embiid on the floor.
When a team loses a major interior player before a high-stakes game, the replacement performance can become a decisive storyline.
Drummond’s 14 points and 10 rebounds meant Philadelphia did not simply survive the frontcourt challenge. It received substantial production from the replacement option.
Orlando’s Shooting Efficiency Was the Main Problem
Orlando shot 41% from the field.
That number is not catastrophic, but it was clearly below Philadelphia’s 45%.
The bigger issue was the combination of field-goal efficiency and three-point efficiency.
Orlando shot:
- 41% overall
- 26% from three
- 77% from the line
Philadelphia shot:
- 45% overall
- 34% from three
- 84% from the line
The difference in free-throw percentage was smaller than the difference from three, but every efficiency edge mattered.
When a team shoots 26% from three in a game where its opponent shoots 34%, it becomes difficult to overcome the resulting scoring gap without creating a significant advantage somewhere else.
Orlando did not create a large enough advantage in rebounding, assists, or free-throw attempts to offset it.
Turnovers Were Another Hidden Difference
Turnovers can be easy to overlook when reading a box score because they do not appear as points.
But they directly affect the number of possessions available to each team.
Orlando committed 14 turnovers.
Philadelphia committed 11.
That three-turnover difference was not enormous, but it favored the team that was already shooting better.
Philadelphia also recorded eight steals to Orlando’s five.
That means the 76ers were both protecting the ball more effectively and creating more defensive disruption.
For a Play-In game, that is a valuable combination.
The Game’s Possession Profile
The available team statistics provide a useful picture of how the game was played.
Orlando generated 44 points in the paint and 15 fast-break points.
Philadelphia generated 38 points in the paint and 12 fast-break points.
So Orlando actually had a 6-point advantage in the paint and a 3-point advantage in fast-break scoring.
Yet Philadelphia won by 12.
That means the 76ers’ advantage came from other parts of the scoring profile, especially perimeter shooting and free-throw efficiency.
Philadelphia also produced 22 bench points compared with Orlando’s 24, so the bench scoring gap was minimal.
This is an excellent example of why a complete statistical analysis should examine several categories together.
Matchup Context and Play-In Stakes
The game carried much greater significance than an ordinary regular-season matchup.
Both teams entered with 45-37 records according to the supplied data, but Philadelphia held the No. 7 position while Orlando entered as the No. 8 team.
The winner would secure the seventh seed and advance directly into the first round.
The loser would have to play again for the eighth seed.
The NBA’s official Orlando release confirmed that the April 15 winner would claim the No. 7 seed and that the loser would receive another opportunity for the No. 8 position.
Philadelphia ultimately secured the seventh seed with the 109-97 victory.
The stakes help explain why fourth-quarter execution, defensive possessions, and shot selection mattered so much.
What the Player Stats Say About Orlando’s Offense
The Magic’s statistics suggest an offense that had enough individual scoring talent but struggled to turn that talent into consistent efficiency.
Bane’s 34 points were excellent.
Banchero contributed 18 points and 4 assists.
Wagner scored 12 while shooting 45.5%.
Carter Jr. controlled the glass with 11 rebounds.
Suggs helped with four assists.
Yet the team finished with only 97 points.
The issue was not a lack of recognizable contributors. It was the efficiency of those contributions.
Banchero’s 7-of-22 shooting and six turnovers were particularly difficult for Orlando to overcome.
When one of the team’s main creators takes 22 shots and turns the ball over six times, the offensive margin for error becomes much smaller.
What the Player Stats Say About Philadelphia’s Offense
Philadelphia’s offensive profile was more balanced.
Maxey produced 31 points and 6 assists.
Oubre scored 19.
Edgecombe contributed 19 points and 11 rebounds.
George added 16.
Drummond posted 14 points and 10 rebounds.
That meant Philadelphia had several productive scoring and rebounding options.
The distribution also reduced the pressure on Maxey to produce every possession.
Philadelphia’s 109 points were therefore the result of both individual excellence and collective efficiency.
Most Important Player Performances
If the game is reduced to the performances that had the greatest practical effect, several players stand out.
Tyrese Maxey
31 points, 6 assists
Maxey was Philadelphia’s primary offensive engine and the most important overall scorer.
Desmond Bane
34 points
Bane had the game’s highest individual scoring total and was Orlando’s clear offensive leader.
VJ Edgecombe
19 points, 11 rebounds
Edgecombe provided the type of two-way production that helped Philadelphia win the possession battle.
Kelly Oubre Jr.
19 points, +19 plus/minus
Oubre’s scoring and team-leading plus/minus made him one of Philadelphia’s most effective supporting players.
Wendell Carter Jr.
11 rebounds
Carter Jr. gave Orlando a strong interior rebounding contribution.
Andre Drummond
14 points, 10 rebounds
Drummond’s double-double was especially valuable because Philadelphia was operating without Embiid.
What the Matchup Reveals About Winning Basketball
The most useful lesson from this game is that winning basketball rarely depends on one statistic.
Orlando had the game’s leading scorer.
Orlando also had more points in the paint, more rebounds, more assists, more free-throw attempts, and more fast-break points.
Philadelphia still won comfortably.
Why?
Because the 76ers were more efficient where it mattered most.
They shot better overall.
They shot substantially better from three.
They shot better from the free-throw line.
They committed fewer turnovers.
They generated more steals and blocks.
Most importantly, they finished the fourth quarter strongly.
This combination demonstrates why player stats should always be interpreted in context.
How to Read These Statistics Correctly
When researching a game like this, a useful process is to move from broad numbers to individual performance.
Start with the final score.
Then compare:
- Field-goal percentage
- Three-point percentage
- Free-throw percentage
- Rebounds
- Turnovers
- Assists
- Steals and blocks
- Quarter-by-quarter scoring
- Individual scoring efficiency
- Plus/minus and lineup context
This approach helps prevent misleading conclusions.
For example, looking only at Bane’s 34 points could suggest Orlando had the better offensive player and should have won.
Looking only at rebounds could suggest Orlando had the physical advantage.
Looking only at assists could suggest Orlando moved the ball better.
But once all categories are combined, Philadelphia’s victory becomes much easier to understand.
Final Statistical Verdict
The orlando magic vs 76ers match player stats show two very different stories.
For Orlando, the individual headline was Desmond Bane’s 34-point performance. Carter Jr.’s 11 rebounds and the contributions from Banchero, Wagner, and Suggs also provided positive elements.
For Philadelphia, the headline was Maxey’s 31 points and 6 assists. But the victory was not simply a Maxey performance.
Edgecombe’s 19 points and 11 rebounds, Oubre’s 19 points and +19 plus/minus, George’s 16 points, and Drummond’s 14-point, 10-rebound double-double gave the 76ers enough depth to withstand Orlando’s best scoring effort.
The team statistics reinforce that conclusion.
Philadelphia won 109-97 after shooting 45% from the field and 34% from three, compared with Orlando’s 41% and 26%. The Sixers also committed three fewer turnovers and recorded five more blocks.
The fourth quarter ultimately provided the clearest separation. Philadelphia scored 30 points in the final period while Orlando scored 23.
That seven-point quarter advantage was enough to turn a competitive game into a 12-point Philadelphia victory.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the Orlando Magic vs 76ers game?
Desmond Bane led Orlando with 34 points, while Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 31 points. Bane had the highest individual scoring total in the game.
What was the final score?
The Philadelphia 76ers defeated the Orlando Magic 109-97 in the Eastern Conference Play-In Tournament.
Who led the game in rebounds?
Wendell Carter Jr. and VJ Edgecombe each recorded 11 rebounds, tying for the game-high total.
How many assists did Tyrese Maxey have?
Maxey recorded 6 assists along with his 31 points, making him Philadelphia’s assist leader.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
Philadelphia shot 34% from three-point range, while Orlando shot 26%. The 76ers also made 12 three-pointers compared with Orlando’s 7.
When was the game played?
The official NBA game record lists the matchup as Wednesday, April 15, 2026, at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia. NBA coverage published on April 16 also reported on the result.
Conclusion
The orlando magic vs 76ers match player stats provide a clear example of how a basketball game can be decided by efficiency rather than simply individual scoring.
Desmond Bane’s 34 points were the most impressive scoring total of the night, but Orlando could not turn that production into a team victory. Paolo Banchero contributed 18 points and 4 assists, Wendell Carter Jr. collected 11 rebounds, and Franz Wagner finished with Orlando’s best plus/minus at +1.
Philadelphia received a more balanced attack.
Tyrese Maxey scored 31 points and added 6 assists. VJ Edgecombe delivered 19 points and 11 rebounds. Kelly Oubre Jr. scored 19 points and posted a +19 plus/minus. Paul George added 16 points, while Andre Drummond produced 14 points and 10 rebounds.
The team numbers explain the result even more clearly. Philadelphia shot 45% from the field and 34% from three, compared with Orlando’s 41% and 26%. The Sixers also committed fewer turnovers, generated more steals, blocked more shots, and outscored Orlando 30-23 in the fourth quarter.
In the end, Philadelphia’s 109-97 victory was not based on one isolated advantage. It came from combining efficient perimeter shooting, dependable free-throw execution, defensive activity, multiple scoring options, and stronger closing performance.
The official NBA box score and game record provide the underlying statistical record for readers who want to verify the individual and team numbers. official NBA game box score
