76ers vs Memphis Grizzlies Match Player Stats
The 76ers vs memphis grizzlies match player stats from Philadelphia’s 139-129 victory over Memphis tell a much more interesting story than the final score alone. Philadelphia entered the fourth quarter trailing 104-98, then produced a 41-25 closing period to turn the game around at Xfinity Mobile Arena. Cameron Payne delivered the headline performance with 32 points and a career-high eight three-pointers, while Kelly Oubre Jr. added 31 points and 12 rebounds. On Memphis’ side, Ty Jerome led the Grizzlies with 26 points and eight assists.
There is one important data correction before getting into the analysis. The official NBA record lists the game as March 10, 2026, not March 11. It also records Oubre Jr. with 31 points, Quentin Grimes with 22 points, and Jahmai Mashack with seven points. The supplied figures for those players differ from the official box score. Because accurate player statistics matter, this analysis uses the official NBA record wherever the supplied figures conflict with it.
The result was Philadelphia’s second victory over Memphis in the 2025-26 season. The Sixers had also won the earlier meeting 139-136 in overtime on December 31, making the season series 2-0 in Philadelphia’s favor.
76ers vs memphis grizzlies match player stats at a glance
The most useful way to understand this game is to separate scoring, playmaking, shooting efficiency, rebounding, turnovers, and fourth-quarter execution.
| Category | Memphis Grizzlies | Philadelphia 76ers |
| Final score | 129 | 139 |
| Field goals | 48/97 | 45/86 |
| Field-goal percentage | 49.5% | 52.3% |
| Three-pointers | 17/43 | 11/31 |
| Three-point percentage | 39.5% | 35.5% |
| Free throws | 16/21 | 38/46 |
| Free-throw percentage | 76.2% | 82.6% |
| Rebounds | 44 | 40 |
| Assists | 26 | 27 |
| Turnovers | 20 | 10 |
| Steals | 5 | 13 |
| Blocks | 3 | 5 |
| Fourth-quarter points | 25 | 41 |
The biggest statistical difference was not three-point shooting. Memphis actually made more threes, 17 compared with Philadelphia’s 11.
The decisive gap came from free throws, ball security, defensive activity, and fourth-quarter execution.
Philadelphia attempted 46 free throws to Memphis’ 21. The Sixers also committed only 10 turnovers compared with Memphis’ 20. That created a major possession advantage in a game where both teams scored efficiently from the field.
That distinction is important because a casual reading of the box score might suggest Memphis simply lost because it shot fewer three-pointers. It did not. Memphis shot nearly 40% from three. Philadelphia won because it converted its possessions more efficiently when the game became tight.
Philadelphia 76ers player performance
Cameron Payne
Cameron Payne was the central figure in the game.
He finished with 32 points and 10 assists, while making a career-high eight three-pointers. The official NBA recap notes that Payne scored 13 of his 32 points in the fourth quarter, exactly when Philadelphia needed its offense to become more aggressive.
His eight made threes were particularly important because Memphis had been able to maintain an offensive rhythm for three quarters.
Payne’s performance combined three valuable elements:
- High-volume scoring
- Efficient perimeter shooting
- Primary playmaking responsibility
That combination made it difficult for Memphis to solve Philadelphia’s offense with a single defensive adjustment.
The most impressive part of Payne’s performance was not simply the 32-point total. It was the timing of those points. Scoring 13 in the final quarter meant his production arrived during the game’s highest-leverage possessions.
From an analytical perspective, this is why raw points can sometimes undersell a player’s influence. A 32-point performance spread evenly across a game is valuable. A 32-point performance with a major scoring burst in a comeback fourth quarter can be far more decisive.
Kelly Oubre Jr.
Kelly Oubre Jr. delivered one of Philadelphia’s most complete performances.
The official record gives him 31 points and 12 rebounds.
Oubre’s contribution mattered because he was not simply a perimeter scorer. His 12 rebounds gave Philadelphia another source of possessions and helped compensate for the Sixers finishing with four fewer total rebounds than Memphis.
His scoring also reduced the pressure on Payne.
That balance is worth emphasizing. Memphis could not focus exclusively on Payne because Philadelphia had another established scoring option producing more than 30 points. When a defense has to account for multiple high-output players, help rotations become more difficult and closeouts become more demanding.
Oubre’s rebounding was equally valuable. In a game decided by only 10 points, extra possessions have real significance.
Quentin Grimes
Quentin Grimes scored 22 points, according to the official box score and game recap.
The supplied data listed 23 points, but the official NBA record lists 22. That one-point difference does not change the overall story, but it demonstrates why checking the primary box score is important when publishing sports statistics.
Grimes’ value extended beyond his scoring total. His perimeter presence helped Philadelphia maintain spacing around Payne and Oubre.
When Payne was handling the ball, Memphis could not simply collapse toward the middle because Philadelphia’s wings were positioned to punish defensive help.
VJ Edgecombe
VJ Edgecombe returned to the lineup and scored 21 points. The NBA’s official recap specifically highlighted his return and his role in taking over point guard duties with Tyrese Maxey unavailable.
This was a significant contextual factor.
Philadelphia did not have its normal offensive structure. Maxey was sidelined, and Joel Embiid was also unavailable. Rather than allowing those absences to completely disrupt the offense, the Sixers redistributed responsibilities.
Edgecombe’s return helped stabilize the backcourt while Payne provided the explosive scoring performance.
This is one of the clearest examples of why player statistics should always be read in context. A 21-point game from a player returning from an absence can carry a different tactical meaning from 21 points produced by a fully healthy starter in a normal rotation.
Philadelphia’s defensive contribution
The Sixers recorded 13 steals and five blocks, compared with five steals and three blocks for Memphis.
The 13 steals are particularly notable.
Philadelphia also committed only 10 turnovers, meaning the Sixers won the turnover battle by a remarkable 10 possessions.
That matters because Memphis scored 129 points despite the loss. The Grizzlies were not shut down offensively. Instead, Philadelphia consistently created defensive events that helped offset Memphis’ efficient shooting.
Memphis Grizzlies player performance
Ty Jerome
Ty Jerome was Memphis’ leading scorer with 26 points, while also recording eight assists. He shot 10-of-20 from the field and 4-of-10 from three-point range.
Jerome was one of the main reasons Memphis remained competitive for most of the night.
His ability to score and distribute made him a dual threat. Philadelphia could not treat him as a pure shooter because he was also creating opportunities for teammates.
The Grizzlies led 115-107 after Jerome’s three-pointer with 9:34 remaining. That moment illustrates how effective Memphis had been for much of the fourth quarter before the game changed dramatically.
Jerome ultimately fouled out through two technical fouls with 1:18 remaining, ending a strong individual performance on an unfortunate note.
Cedric Coward
Cedric Coward led Memphis in rebounding with 16 boards.
His rebounding performance was one of the strongest individual statistical contributions from either team. Memphis finished with 44 total rebounds, four more than Philadelphia.
Coward’s 16 rebounds demonstrate that Memphis was not losing the physical battle on the glass.
That is another reason the game should not be reduced to a simple shooting comparison.
Memphis won the rebounding battle and made 17 three-pointers. Yet it still lost by 10.
The explanation comes from what happened in other areas of the box score.
GG Jackson
GG Jackson scored 15 points for Memphis. The official box score records him at 6-of-12 from the field, with one made three-pointer.
However, his plus/minus was -26, one of the lowest figures in the game.
Plus/minus should never be treated as a standalone measurement of player quality, but in this particular game it reinforces a larger team trend. Memphis struggled during stretches when Philadelphia gained control of the game.
Jackson’s offensive contribution was useful, but Memphis needed more overall two-way impact during the decisive minutes.
Jahmai Mashack
The official NBA box score gives Mashack seven points, not 14 as listed in the supplied data. He shot 2-of-4 from the field and added one assist.
This is an important correction for anyone using these numbers in an article, database, fantasy analysis, or statistical comparison.
Accurate player-level data is especially important when several statistics are being compared across teams. One incorrect line can easily lead to a misleading conclusion about who carried an offense.
Memphis’ supporting cast
Memphis received meaningful scoring from several players.
Rayan Rupert scored 14 points and shot 6-of-9 from the field. Javon Small and Cam Spencer each added 12 points. Jaylen Wells scored 11.
This shows that Memphis did not rely entirely on Jerome.
The Grizzlies had enough offensive production to reach 129 points, which is usually a winning-level total. The problem was that Philadelphia’s fourth-quarter surge was even more productive.
Why Philadelphia won the fourth quarter
This is the central question behind the 76ers vs memphis grizzlies match player stats.
The score entering the final quarter was Memphis 104, Philadelphia 98.
The Grizzlies therefore had a six-point advantage with 12 minutes remaining.
Memphis even extended its lead to 115-107 after Jerome’s three-pointer.
Then the game changed.
Philadelphia scored 12 consecutive points and moved ahead 119-115. Payne’s three-pointer was part of that surge, and Philadelphia continued building the advantage. Dominick Barlow’s three-point play later pushed the lead to 128-117 with 4:56 remaining.
The final quarter ended:
Philadelphia 41, Memphis 25.
That 16-point quarter differential was larger than the final 10-point margin.
In other words, Philadelphia did not win by gradually controlling the game from start to finish. It won by producing the game’s most important run at the most important time.
That is the defining feature of this matchup.
Shooting efficiency tells an important story
Memphis shot 48-of-97, or 49.5%, from the field.
Philadelphia shot 45-of-86, or 52.3%.
At first glance, the difference appears small.
But Philadelphia needed 11 fewer field-goal attempts to score 139 points.
That is significant.
The Sixers also shot 38-of-46 from the free-throw line, while Memphis went 16-of-21.
Philadelphia therefore generated a large amount of offense without needing to dominate the three-point category.
Memphis made 17 threes compared with Philadelphia’s 11.
The Grizzlies’ three-point percentage was also better, approximately 39.5% compared with Philadelphia’s 35.5%.
Yet Philadelphia still won.
This is a useful lesson when evaluating NBA box scores. Three-point makes are important, but they are only one part of offensive efficiency. Free throws, turnovers, shooting percentage, offensive rebounding, and possession volume can completely change the outcome.
The free-throw advantage was enormous
One of the clearest statistical advantages belonged to Philadelphia at the foul line.
The Sixers attempted 46 free throws.
Memphis attempted 21.
That is a difference of 25 attempts.
Philadelphia converted 38 of those attempts, producing 38 points from the free-throw line.
Memphis made 16.
The resulting 22-point difference in free-throw scoring was more than twice the final margin.
That does not mean every free throw was equally responsible for the result. But it does show how important Philadelphia’s ability to reach and convert at the line was.
For anyone studying player performance, this is a reminder that field-goal percentage alone does not describe offensive efficiency.
Turnovers were another major separator
Memphis committed 20 turnovers.
Philadelphia committed only 10.
The Sixers therefore gave the ball away half as often as the Grizzlies.
The NBA game summary also records Philadelphia with 19 fast-break points compared with eight for Memphis.
That combination is revealing.
Philadelphia did not merely avoid turnovers. It converted defensive activity into transition opportunities.
Memphis’ 20 turnovers gave Philadelphia additional chances to attack before the Grizzlies could establish their half-court defense.
This was particularly important in a high-scoring game. When both teams are capable of scoring efficiently in the half court, transition possessions can become a major separator.
Rebounding: Memphis actually had the edge
Memphis finished with 44 rebounds.
Philadelphia finished with 40.
That means the losing team won the rebounding battle.
Cedric Coward’s 16 rebounds were central to that advantage, while Oubre Jr.’s 12 led Philadelphia.
This is another example of why one statistic rarely explains an NBA game.
If rebounding alone determined the winner, Memphis would have had a strong argument.
But the Grizzlies gave away too many possessions through turnovers and could not match Philadelphia’s free-throw production.
The overall result came from the interaction of several statistical categories rather than one dominant number.
Team comparison: where the game was really won
The most useful way to interpret the 76ers vs memphis grizzlies match player stats is to identify the categories that actually influenced the result.
Philadelphia’s biggest advantages
- Turnovers
Philadelphia committed 10 turnovers compared with Memphis’ 20.
- Free throws
Philadelphia made 38 free throws compared with Memphis’ 16.
- Fourth-quarter scoring
Philadelphia scored 41 points in the final period while Memphis scored 25.
- Defensive activity
The Sixers recorded 13 steals and five blocks.
- Overall field-goal efficiency
Philadelphia shot approximately 52.3% from the field.
Memphis’ biggest advantages
- Three-point shooting
Memphis made 17 threes compared with Philadelphia’s 11.
- Rebounding
Memphis finished with 44 rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 40.
- Three-point percentage
Memphis shot approximately 39.5% from three.
These advantages were real, but they were not enough to compensate for the Sixers’ superiority in ball security, free-throw production, and closing execution.
The role of missing players
The circumstances surrounding the game also matter.
Philadelphia was without Tyrese Maxey and Joel Embiid. The NBA’s official recap also notes that Paul George was unavailable because of a league suspension.
That makes the scoring distribution particularly notable.
Instead of one superstar carrying the offense, Philadelphia received major production from Payne, Oubre, Grimes, and Edgecombe.
Payne’s 32 points were the headline number, but the broader story was collective replacement production.
This is the kind of context that raw 76ers vs memphis grizzlies match player stats cannot provide by themselves.
A box score tells you what happened statistically.
Game context helps explain why it happened.
What the player stats say about Philadelphia
Philadelphia’s performance suggests a team capable of winning through multiple offensive routes.
Payne created from the guard position.
Oubre supplied scoring and rebounding.
Grimes provided perimeter scoring.
Edgecombe added another ball-handling and attacking option.
That balance became especially valuable when the game entered the final quarter.
The Sixers did not need every possession to run through one player.
That made their offense harder to disrupt.
The 27 assists also show reasonable ball movement, while the 10 turnovers indicate that Philadelphia maintained control of its possessions.
The combination of 27 assists and only 10 turnovers is especially useful for evaluating offensive organization.
What the player stats say about Memphis
Memphis demonstrated genuine offensive quality.
The Grizzlies scored 129 points and shot almost 50% from the field.
Jerome was efficient from the field and created eight assists. Coward controlled the glass. Several supporting players reached double figures.
The problem was consistency.
Memphis had enough offense to lead late, but its 20 turnovers created opportunities that Philadelphia could exploit.
The fourth quarter then exposed the cost of those mistakes.
When Philadelphia turned the game into a possession-by-possession contest, Memphis could not sustain the same level of execution.
The season-series picture
Philadelphia finished the 2025-26 season series against Memphis with a 2-0 record.
The earlier meeting ended with Philadelphia winning 139-136 in overtime on December 31.
The second meeting ended 139-129 in regulation.
That means Philadelphia scored exactly 139 points in both meetings.
The repeated offensive output is noteworthy, but the two games were not identical.
The December contest required overtime and ended with a three-point margin.
The March meeting featured a fourth-quarter Philadelphia comeback and a 10-point final margin.
The recurring pattern was Philadelphia finding enough offensive production to overcome Memphis’ scoring ability.
A closer look at the closing stretch
The final five minutes provide perhaps the clearest explanation of the result.
Memphis had been ahead 115-107.
Philadelphia then created a 12-0 run to take a 119-115 lead.
From there, the Sixers continued extending the advantage.
This sequence illustrates an important basketball principle: a team can control much of a game and still lose because of a short stretch in which execution breaks down.
For Memphis, the problem was not simply that Philadelphia started making shots.
The Grizzlies also stopped producing points during the critical stretch.
The NBA recap notes that Memphis went nearly three and a half minutes without scoring during Philadelphia’s decisive run.
In a 129-point game, a scoring drought of that length can be devastating.
How to read the box score correctly
If you are using this game as a reference for sports analysis, there are several lessons worth keeping in mind.
Do not rely only on the top scorer
Payne’s 32 points were important, but Oubre’s 31 points and 12 rebounds were nearly as significant.
Do not assume the team with more threes won
Memphis made six more three-pointers and still lost.
Do not ignore free throws
Philadelphia’s 38 made free throws were a major component of the scoring difference.
Check turnovers
A 20-10 turnover difference is too large to overlook.
Look at quarter-by-quarter performance
The fourth-quarter score of 41-25 explains the comeback better than the final score alone.
Check the official record when numbers conflict
The supplied statistics contained several differences from the official NBA box score. For publishing purposes, the official record should take priority.
Who was the best player?
Cameron Payne has the strongest case for Philadelphia’s game MVP.
He scored 32 points, recorded 10 assists, made eight three-pointers, and scored 13 points in the fourth quarter. The official NBA site also records his career-high eight made threes.
Oubre Jr. deserves serious consideration because of his 31 points and 12 rebounds.
For Memphis, Jerome was the clear offensive leader with 26 points and eight assists.
Coward’s 16 rebounds made him Memphis’ most significant contributor in the rebounding category.
Why the final score can be misleading
A 139-129 result might look like a comfortable Philadelphia win.
It was not.
Memphis led late in the fourth quarter.
The Grizzlies were shooting well.
They had a rebounding advantage.
They had made more three-pointers.
The game turned because Philadelphia combined pressure defense, low turnover volume, free-throw generation, and an explosive final quarter.
That distinction matters for anyone studying the game beyond the headline score.
The 76ers did not dominate every category.
They dominated the categories that became most important when the game was decided.
Official data and source note
For the most reliable version of the box score, player totals, shooting figures, game information, and play-by-play details, use the official NBA game record rather than secondary stat aggregators. NBA official game box score and play-by-play
The official record confirms the March 10, 2026 date, the 139-129 Philadelphia victory, the 17,897 attendance figure, the quarter-by-quarter scoring, and the player leaders.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the 76ers vs Grizzlies game?
Cameron Payne led Philadelphia with 32 points. Ty Jerome led Memphis with 26 points. Kelly Oubre Jr. scored 31 for Philadelphia.
Who had the most rebounds in the game?
Cedric Coward led all players with 16 rebounds for Memphis. Kelly Oubre Jr. led Philadelphia with 12 rebounds.
How many assists did Cameron Payne record?
Cameron Payne recorded 10 assists while scoring 32 points for Philadelphia.
What was the final score?
The Philadelphia 76ers defeated the Memphis Grizzlies 139-129 at Xfinity Mobile Arena.
When was the game played?
The official NBA record lists the game as Tuesday, March 10, 2026. The supplied data listed March 11, but the official record should be used for publication.
Which team won the season series?
Philadelphia won both meetings against Memphis during the 2025-26 season, finishing the series 2-0.
Conclusion
The 76ers vs memphis grizzlies match player stats show why Philadelphia’s 139-129 victory was more about execution than simple shooting volume.
Memphis shot better from three, collected more rebounds, and scored 129 points. Ty Jerome delivered 26 points and eight assists, while Cedric Coward produced 16 rebounds. Those numbers show that Memphis had plenty of individual production.
Philadelphia, however, controlled the details that decided the game.
Cameron Payne scored 32 points and added 10 assists while making a career-high eight three-pointers. Kelly Oubre Jr. contributed 31 points and 12 rebounds. VJ Edgecombe returned to action with 21 points, and Quentin Grimes added 22.
The biggest team-level differences were just as important. Philadelphia committed 10 turnovers compared with Memphis’ 20, made 38 free throws compared with Memphis’ 16, and recorded 13 steals. Most importantly, the Sixers transformed a six-point fourth-quarter deficit into a 10-point victory by outscoring Memphis 41-25 in the final period.
The game is therefore a strong example of why NBA player statistics should be interpreted together rather than individually. Three-point shooting, rebounding, assists, turnovers, free throws, and fourth-quarter scoring all contributed to the final result.
For readers searching for the 76ers vs memphis grizzlies match player stats, the clearest takeaway is simple: Memphis produced strong offensive numbers, but Philadelphia won the possession battle and executed far better when the game reached its decisive stage.
