Los Angeles Rams vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats
The los angeles rams vs baltimore ravens match player stats tell the story of a game that was decided by efficiency rather than total yardage. On October 12, 2025, the Los Angeles Rams traveled to Baltimore and earned an impressive 17 to 3 victory despite being outgained on the ground. The Rams relied on disciplined quarterback play, timely scoring drives, aggressive defense, and game changing turnovers, while the Ravens struggled to convert their offensive production into points. Looking beyond the final score reveals why Los Angeles controlled the contest from the second quarter onward and how individual performances shaped the outcome.
For football fans, analysts, and fantasy football players, this matchup provides an excellent example of why statistics should always be viewed in context. Baltimore finished with more rushing yards and controlled possession through Derrick Henry, yet mistakes in critical situations allowed the Rams to dictate the game. Every passing attempt, defensive stop, sack, and turnover contributed to one of the Rams’ most complete road victories of the season.
Match Overview
| Match Detail | Result |
| Game | Los Angeles Rams vs Baltimore Ravens |
| Date | October 12, 2025 |
| Competition | NFL |
| Venue | Baltimore |
| Final Score | Los Angeles Rams 17, Baltimore Ravens 3 |
| Rams Record | 4 to 2 |
| Ravens Record | 1 to 5 |
Quarter by Quarter Score
| Quarter | Rams | Ravens |
| First | 0 | 3 |
| Second | 3 | 0 |
| Third | 14 | 0 |
| Fourth | 0 | 0 |
The opening quarter suggested a defensive battle, with Baltimore taking a 3 to 0 lead through a Tyler Loop field goal. Neither offense found much rhythm early, but the Rams gradually adjusted. A Joshua Karty field goal tied the contest before halftime, and Los Angeles completely dominated the third quarter with two touchdowns that effectively ended the game.
The final score reflected more than just offensive execution. Defensive pressure, turnovers, and field position consistently favored Los Angeles throughout the second half.
Los Angeles Rams vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats
The los angeles rams vs baltimore ravens match player stats reveal an interesting contrast between offensive production and game management.
Team Offensive Comparison
| Category | Rams | Ravens |
| Points | 17 | 3 |
| Passing Yards | 181 | 140 |
| Rushing Yards | 74 | 179 |
| Total Passing Attempts | 26 | 34 |
| Passing Completions | 17 | 21 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 1 |
| Team Sacks Allowed | 2 | 4 |
| Fumbles Lost | 1 | 2 |
At first glance, Baltimore’s rushing attack appears dominant. The Ravens nearly doubled the Rams’ rushing production with 179 yards compared to 74. However, football games are rarely decided by one statistic alone.
The Rams protected the football more effectively, committed fewer costly mistakes, converted scoring opportunities, and consistently disrupted Baltimore’s quarterbacks. Those differences ultimately produced a comfortable road victory.
Matthew Stafford Leads an Efficient Passing Attack
The Matthew Stafford once again demonstrated why experience remains valuable in critical games.
Matthew Stafford Passing Statistics
| Statistic | Total |
| Completions | 17 |
| Attempts | 26 |
| Passing Yards | 181 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Completion Rate | 65.4% |
| Passer Rating | 98.4 |
| QBR | 60.6 |
Although Stafford did not produce huge passing numbers, he made intelligent decisions throughout the afternoon.
From watching games with similar statistical profiles, I have consistently noticed that quarterbacks who avoid negative plays often create more winning opportunities than those chasing explosive numbers. Stafford’s performance perfectly reflected that principle. Rather than forcing difficult throws, he accepted shorter completions, avoided interceptions, and trusted his defense.
His lone touchdown pass to Tyler Higbee proved to be one of the defining moments of the contest.
Baltimore’s Quarterback Rotation Struggled
The Ravens divided quarterback responsibilities between Cooper Rush and Tyler Huntley.
Cooper Rush
| Statistic | Total |
| Completions | 11 |
| Attempts | 19 |
| Passing Yards | 72 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 44.2 |
Rush struggled to stretch the field and threw an interception that shifted momentum toward Los Angeles.
Tyler Huntley
| Statistic | Total |
| Completions | 10 |
| Attempts | 15 |
| Passing Yards | 68 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 76.5 |
Huntley added mobility with several productive runs, but Baltimore still failed to generate touchdowns.
Combining for only 140 passing yards illustrates how effectively the Rams defended every level of the field.
Running Game Analysis
The biggest statistical surprise came from Baltimore’s rushing success.
Rams Rushing Leaders
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Kyren Williams | 13 | 50 | 3.8 | 1 |
| Blake Corum | 5 | 23 | 4.6 | 0 |
| Matthew Stafford | 4 | 1 | 0.3 | 0 |
Kyren Williams provided balanced production by contributing both as a runner and receiver. His rushing touchdown extended the Rams’ lead and helped control the tempo after halftime.
Blake Corum also supplied efficient carries, averaging 4.6 yards per attempt despite limited opportunities.
Derrick Henry Was Outstanding Despite the Loss
One of the most impressive individual performances belonged to Derrick Henry.
| Statistic | Total |
| Carries | 24 |
| Rushing Yards | 122 |
| Average | 5.1 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
Henry consistently broke tackles and kept Baltimore ahead of schedule on early downs.
Unfortunately for the Ravens, those rushing yards rarely translated into scoring opportunities because drives stalled through sacks, turnovers, and ineffective passing.
This game serves as another reminder that outstanding rushing numbers alone cannot overcome mistakes in other phases of football.
Receiving Leaders
Matthew Stafford distributed the football efficiently across multiple receivers rather than relying on one target.
Rams Receiving Leaders
| Player | Receptions | Yards | TD |
| Tyler Higbee | 4 | 40 | 1 |
| Davante Adams | 4 | 39 | 0 |
| Kyren Williams | 2 | 37 | 0 |
| Puka Nacua | 2 | 28 | 0 |
| Jordan Whittington | 3 | 23 | 0 |
Tyler Higbee’s touchdown reception became the game’s biggest offensive play.
Davante Adams attracted nine targets, showing Stafford’s confidence in the veteran receiver even when explosive plays were limited.
Kyren Williams added important receiving production out of the backfield, including a 30 yard reception that helped flip field position.
The Rams did not rely on one superstar performance. Instead, multiple receivers contributed enough to sustain drives while avoiding costly mistakes.
Ravens Receiving Performance
Although Baltimore completed more passes than Los Angeles, the production remained modest. Most completions were short gains, allowing the Rams’ defense to limit yards after the catch and prevent explosive plays.
Baltimore Ravens Receiving Stats
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | Long |
| Zay Flowers | 6 | 46 | 7.7 | 18 |
| Justice Hill | 5 | 28 | 5.6 | 13 |
| Mark Andrews | 4 | 24 | 6.0 | 9 |
| DeAndre Hopkins | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 11 |
| Derrick Henry | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 8 |
| Rashod Bateman | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 8 |
| Isaiah Likely | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 5 |
| Charlie Kolar | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Zay Flowers led Baltimore with six catches for 46 yards and remained the team’s most dependable receiving option. However, the Rams consistently prevented him from turning short receptions into game changing plays.
Justice Hill contributed as a check down receiver, while veteran tight end Mark Andrews was held to only 24 receiving yards. DeAndre Hopkins averaged 10 yards per catch but saw only two receptions, limiting his overall impact.
When reviewing this game, one point becomes clear. Baltimore completed enough passes to move the chains occasionally, but very few throws threatened the Rams’ secondary. The lack of explosive receptions allowed Los Angeles to keep defenders closer to the line of scrimmage without giving up deep touchdowns.
Defensive Performances That Decided the Game
The final score cannot be explained by offensive statistics alone. The Rams’ defense consistently won key situations, creating pressure on Baltimore’s quarterbacks and forcing turnovers at critical moments.
Rams Defensive Team Statistics
| Category | Total |
| Total Tackles | 87 |
| Solo Tackles | 47 |
| Sacks | 4 |
| Tackles for Loss | 7 |
| Pass Deflections | 4 |
| Quarterback Hits | 11 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
These numbers highlight an aggressive defensive approach. Eleven quarterback hits disrupted Baltimore’s passing rhythm throughout the afternoon, while four sacks repeatedly forced long down and distance situations.
Nate Landman Leads the Defense
Nate Landman delivered one of the best defensive performances of the game.
| Statistic | Total |
| Total Tackles | 17 |
| Solo Tackles | 8 |
His tackling consistency prevented Baltimore from extending several rushing plays into explosive gains. Even though Derrick Henry surpassed 100 rushing yards, Landman repeatedly stopped drives before they reached scoring territory.
Byron Young Creates Constant Pressure
Byron Young produced one of the game’s most impactful performances.
| Statistic | Total |
| Tackles | 8 |
| Solo Tackles | 4 |
| Sacks | 2 |
Two sacks and consistent quarterback pressure forced Baltimore into uncomfortable passing situations. Young’s performance reflected the Rams’ overall defensive philosophy of attacking rather than reacting.
Other Rams Defensive Contributors
Several defenders quietly influenced the outcome.
| Player | Key Contribution |
| Shaun Dolac | 7 tackles, 6 solo |
| Jared Verse | 6 tackles, 1 tackle for loss |
| Tyler Davis | 6 tackles |
| Quentin Lake | 5 tackles and 1 interception |
| Kam Curl | 5 tackles |
Quentin Lake’s interception ended one promising Baltimore drive and became one of the game’s defining defensive moments.
Ravens Defense Keeps the Game Close
Despite the loss, Baltimore’s defense performed well enough to keep the contest competitive for much of the first half.
Ravens Defensive Team Statistics
| Category | Total |
| Total Tackles | 54 |
| Solo Tackles | 30 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Tackles for Loss | 4 |
| Quarterback Hits | 3 |
| Pass Deflections | 2 |
The Ravens generated pressure at times but could not consistently disrupt Matthew Stafford. Allowing zero interceptions significantly reduced their opportunities to swing momentum.
Trenton Simpson Leads Baltimore
| Statistic | Total |
| Tackles | 9 |
| Solo Tackles | 4 |
Simpson remained active throughout the afternoon, frequently making stops against the run and limiting gains after short completions.
Other Defensive Standouts
| Player | Performance |
| Teddye Buchanan | 9 tackles, 0.5 sack |
| Alohi Gilman | 7 tackles |
| Malaki Starks | 5 tackles |
| Kyle Hamilton | 4 tackles |
| John Jenkins | 3 tackles and 1 sack |
Although several Ravens defenders posted respectable numbers, the defense spent too much time back on the field because the offense failed to sustain scoring drives.
Turnovers Changed Everything
One of the biggest stories hidden within the los angeles rams vs baltimore ravens match player stats is turnover efficiency.
Rams Turnovers
| Category | Total |
| Total Fumbles | 2 |
| Lost Fumbles | 1 |
Matthew Stafford lost one fumble, but the Rams recovered other loose balls quickly and minimized the damage.
Ravens Turnovers
| Category | Total |
| Total Fumbles | 3 |
| Lost Fumbles | 2 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 1 |
Cooper Rush lost a fumble, while Zay Flowers also lost possession during an important drive. Combined with the interception thrown, Baltimore surrendered three possessions.
In my experience analyzing NFL games, turnover margin often tells the real story behind seemingly surprising scorelines. This matchup is a textbook example. Baltimore gained more rushing yards but repeatedly handed possession back to Los Angeles, making sustained comeback attempts almost impossible.
Special Teams Analysis
Special teams quietly influenced field position throughout the game.
Rams Special Teams
Joshua Karty converted one of two field goal attempts and successfully made both extra points for a total of five points.
Ethan Evans averaged an impressive 56.5 yards on two punts, repeatedly forcing Baltimore to begin drives deep in its own territory.
Xavier Smith handled kickoff returns efficiently, averaging 12.5 yards on two returns.
Ravens Special Teams
Tyler Loop remained perfect on the day, making his lone 37 yard field goal.
Jordan Stout averaged 53 yards on his only punt.
Tylan Wallace averaged 22 yards per kickoff return, while LaJohntay Wester provided Baltimore’s best return with a 35 yard punt return.
Although Baltimore enjoyed slightly stronger return production, the advantage never translated into touchdowns or sustained offensive momentum.
Five Key Moments That Shaped the Outcome
1. Rams Adjust After a Slow Start
After being held scoreless in the opening quarter, Los Angeles settled into a balanced offensive rhythm and controlled the remainder of the game.
2. Stafford Protects the Football
Matthew Stafford avoided risky throws and finished without an interception, allowing every scoring drive to end positively.
3. Rams Defense Dominates the Passing Game
Four sacks, eleven quarterback hits, and one interception completely disrupted Baltimore’s quarterbacks.
4. Derrick Henry Lacks Scoring Support
Henry rushed for 122 yards, but without effective passing production, those rushing yards produced no touchdowns.
5. Third Quarter Decides the Contest
The Rams scored 14 unanswered points in the third quarter, turning a close defensive battle into a comfortable victory.
Individual Player Grades
While raw statistics tell much of the story, evaluating each player’s overall impact provides a clearer picture of how the game unfolded.
Los Angeles Rams
| Player | Grade | Analysis |
| Matthew Stafford | A | Efficient, protected the football, threw one touchdown, and managed the game exceptionally well. |
| Kyren Williams | A | Contributed as both a runner and receiver while scoring an important rushing touchdown. |
| Tyler Higbee | A | Reliable target who caught the Rams’ only receiving touchdown. |
| Davante Adams | B+ | Drew defensive attention throughout the game and finished with four receptions. |
| Puka Nacua | B | Made the most of limited opportunities and added valuable first downs. |
| Blake Corum | B | Averaged 4.6 yards per carry in a supporting rushing role. |
| Nate Landman | A+ | Defensive leader with a game high 17 tackles. |
| Byron Young | A+ | Two sacks and constant pressure made him one of the game’s biggest difference makers. |
| Quentin Lake | A | Recorded a crucial interception and played well in coverage. |
Baltimore Ravens
| Player | Grade | Analysis |
| Derrick Henry | A | Outstanding rushing performance despite the defeat. |
| Zay Flowers | B | Led the team in receiving yards but lost a costly fumble. |
| Tyler Huntley | B | Added mobility but could not lead a touchdown drive. |
| Cooper Rush | C | Struggled through the air and threw an interception. |
| Trenton Simpson | B+ | Active throughout the game with nine tackles. |
| Teddye Buchanan | B+ | Consistently around the football and added half a sack. |
| John Jenkins | B | Recorded one sack and contributed against the run. |
Statistical Takeaways
Several statistics explain why the Rams earned a convincing victory despite being outperformed in rushing yards.
Ball Security Won the Game
Los Angeles committed fewer turnovers and capitalized on Baltimore’s mistakes. Protecting possession remains one of the strongest predictors of winning in the NFL, and this game reinforced that principle.
Passing Efficiency Was More Important Than Passing Volume
Matthew Stafford threw for only 181 yards, yet his efficiency was enough because he avoided interceptions and completed timely passes.
Baltimore completed more passes overall, but the lack of explosive plays and touchdown throws limited the offense’s effectiveness.
Defensive Pressure Changed Baltimore’s Offensive Rhythm
The Rams recorded four sacks and eleven quarterback hits. Even on plays that did not result in sacks, constant pressure forced hurried throws and disrupted timing between Baltimore’s quarterbacks and receivers.
Third Quarter Momentum
Championship level teams often dominate immediately after halftime by making successful adjustments. The Rams outscored Baltimore 14 to 0 in the third quarter, demonstrating excellent coaching and execution.
What These Statistics Mean Going Forward
For the Rams, this victory highlighted the value of complementary football. The offense did not need to produce huge numbers because the defense consistently created favorable situations. With a 4 and 2 record after this win, Los Angeles showed it could succeed in multiple ways rather than relying solely on explosive offensive performances.
Baltimore, meanwhile, faced a different challenge. Falling to 1 and 5 despite rushing for 179 yards illustrates how difficult it is to overcome turnovers and an inconsistent passing attack. The Ravens must improve red zone execution, quarterback efficiency, and ball security if they hope to reverse their season.
From an analytical perspective, this game is a reminder that total yardage alone rarely determines outcomes. Football rewards teams that execute well in high leverage situations, protect possession, and capitalize on opponents’ mistakes.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Los Angeles Rams vs Baltimore Ravens game?
The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Baltimore Ravens 17 to 3 on October 12, 2025, earning an important road victory.
Who led the Rams in passing?
Matthew Stafford completed 17 of 26 passes for 181 yards, one touchdown, no interceptions, and posted a 98.4 passer rating.
Who was the leading rusher in the game?
Derrick Henry led all rushers with 122 yards on 24 carries, averaging 5.1 yards per attempt.
Which Rams player scored a receiving touchdown?
Tyler Higbee caught the Rams’ only receiving touchdown, finishing with four receptions for 40 yards.
How many sacks did the Rams defense record?
The Rams defense finished with four sacks and added eleven quarterback hits, consistently pressuring Baltimore’s quarterbacks.
Which defensive player had the biggest impact?
Nate Landman led all defenders with 17 tackles, while Byron Young contributed two sacks. Both played significant roles in limiting Baltimore to only three points.
Conclusion
The los angeles rams vs baltimore ravens match player stats reveal a game where execution proved more valuable than raw production. Although Baltimore generated an impressive 179 rushing yards and Derrick Henry delivered one of the day’s best individual performances, turnovers, quarterback pressure, and missed scoring opportunities prevented the Ravens from turning that production into points.
Los Angeles approached the game with balance and discipline. Matthew Stafford managed the offense efficiently without forcing unnecessary throws, Kyren Williams provided valuable contributions as both a runner and receiver, and Tyler Higbee delivered the game’s only receiving touchdown. Defensively, Nate Landman, Byron Young, and Quentin Lake spearheaded a unit that consistently disrupted Baltimore’s offense through tackles, sacks, quarterback hits, and an interception.
Looking strictly at the numbers, the contest serves as an excellent example of why football games are rarely decided by total yardage alone. Winning the turnover battle, executing efficiently in key moments, and making timely defensive plays enabled the Rams to secure a convincing 17 to 3 road victory despite being outgained on the ground.
