Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chargers Match Player Stats

The pittsburgh steelers vs chargers match player stats tell the story of a game where efficiency, ball security, and timely plays separated the two teams. On November 9, 2025, the Los Angeles Chargers defended their home field with a convincing 25 to 10 victory over the Pittsburgh Steelers. While both defenses created pressure throughout the contest, the Chargers capitalized on scoring opportunities and avoided costly mistakes, whereas Pittsburgh struggled with turnovers and offensive consistency.

Using the official game statistics, this detailed breakdown explains how the Chargers earned the win, which players made the biggest impact, and what the numbers reveal beyond the final score. Instead of simply listing statistics, this analysis puts every major performance into context so readers can better understand how the game unfolded.

Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chargers Match Player Stats

Match Overview

Match Details	Information
Competition	NFL
Date	November 9, 2025
Venue	Chargers Home Stadium
Final Score	Los Angeles Chargers 25, Pittsburgh Steelers 10
Pittsburgh Record	5 to 4
Los Angeles Record	7 to 3

The Chargers entered the matchup with momentum and improved their season record to 7 to 3. Pittsburgh fell to 5 to 4 after struggling offensively against a disciplined Chargers defense.

Although the Steelers generated pressure on Justin Herbert throughout the afternoon, they failed to convert defensive success into offensive production. Los Angeles remained composed, protected the football, and consistently won important situations on both sides of the field.

Quarter by Quarter Breakdown

Understanding the scoring progression provides a much clearer picture than the final score alone.

Quarter	Pittsburgh Steelers	Los Angeles Chargers
First Quarter	3	2
Second Quarter	0	10
Third Quarter	0	3
Fourth Quarter	7	10
Total	10	25

First Quarter

Pittsburgh opened the scoring with a field goal and briefly controlled the momentum. The Chargers answered with a safety, limiting the deficit to one point while immediately shifting field position in their favor.

The opening quarter suggested a defensive battle rather than a high-scoring shootout.

Second Quarter

This proved to be the decisive period.

Los Angeles scored 10 unanswered points while Pittsburgh’s offense stalled repeatedly. Justin Herbert began finding open receivers, and the Chargers established better offensive rhythm through balanced play calling.

Meanwhile, Aaron Rodgers faced increasing defensive pressure and struggled to generate explosive plays.

Third Quarter

Neither offense dominated possession, but another Chargers field goal extended the lead.

Pittsburgh’s defense continued producing sacks and quarterback pressure, yet the offense could not capitalize on favorable situations.

Fourth Quarter

Both teams reached the end zone during the final quarter.

Roman Wilson caught Pittsburgh’s only touchdown pass, but the Chargers responded with another touchdown and additional scoring to comfortably secure the victory.

By the final whistle, Los Angeles had controlled the game’s most important moments while Pittsburgh never seriously threatened a comeback.

Game Flow Analysis

Looking beyond the scoreboard, several themes defined this matchup.

First, turnovers dramatically changed the game’s direction. The Chargers protected possession throughout the contest, while Pittsburgh committed multiple costly mistakes.

Second, offensive balance favored Los Angeles. The Chargers combined productive rushing with efficient passing, making their offense less predictable.

Third, situational football proved critical. Los Angeles consistently converted opportunities into points, while Pittsburgh frequently stalled after crossing midfield.

Finally, discipline separated the teams. The Chargers avoided major self-inflicted errors, allowing their offensive efficiency to steadily wear down the Steelers.

Final Score Summary

The 25 to 10 result accurately reflected the overall balance of play.

Although Pittsburgh’s defense produced five sacks and consistently pressured Justin Herbert, the offense could not reward those efforts. Aaron Rodgers threw two interceptions, the running game produced only 73 total rushing yards, and sustained drives remained difficult throughout the afternoon.

Los Angeles displayed a more complete performance by combining efficient quarterback play, productive rushing, explosive receiving, and mistake-free football.

These early observations establish the foundation for a deeper statistical analysis of every offensive and defensive unit, which will further explain why the Chargers earned one of their most complete victories of the season.

Passing Performance Analysis

Quarterback play often determines the outcome of close NFL games, and this matchup was no exception. While both signal-callers faced heavy defensive pressure, Justin Herbert delivered the more efficient performance by protecting the football and making timely throws. Aaron Rodgers showed flashes of accuracy but struggled with turnovers that ultimately shifted momentum toward Los Angeles.

Passing Leaders

Player	CMP/ATT	Yards	TD	INT	Sacks	Passer Rating
Aaron Rodgers (PIT)	16/31	161	1	2	3	50.6
Justin Herbert (LAC)	20/33	220	1	0	5	90.5

Aaron Rodgers’ Performance

Rodgers finished with 161 passing yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions on 16 completions from 31 attempts. His completion percentage reflected the challenges he faced against the Chargers’ secondary, while the interceptions prevented Pittsburgh from building any sustained momentum.

Although Rodgers absorbed three sacks, the offensive line generally gave him enough opportunities to throw. The greater issue was the inability to consistently connect on intermediate and deep passes. Several drives ended before reaching scoring range, placing additional pressure on the Steelers’ defense.

His lone touchdown pass to Roman Wilson provided a positive moment late in the game, but by then Pittsburgh was already trailing by multiple scores.

Justin Herbert’s Efficient Display

Justin Herbert produced a composed and controlled performance. Completing 20 of 33 passes for 220 yards and one touchdown without throwing an interception, he demonstrated why efficiency often matters more than spectacular numbers.

One of the most impressive aspects of Herbert’s afternoon was his decision-making. Even while taking five sacks from an aggressive Steelers pass rush, he protected possession and avoided risky throws. Rather than forcing passes into tight coverage, he consistently took what the defense allowed.

That approach helped Los Angeles maintain long possessions and keep the offense on schedule throughout the contest.

Rushing Statistics Breakdown

The running game became another major difference between the two teams. Pittsburgh found occasional success with Jaylen Warren, but the Steelers never established a consistent ground attack. The Chargers, on the other hand, leaned on Kimani Vidal to control the clock and wear down the defense.

Team Rushing Comparison

Team	Carries	Yards	Average	Touchdowns
Pittsburgh Steelers	16	73	4.6	0
Los Angeles Chargers	31	115	3.7	1

The contrast in rushing attempts stands out immediately. Los Angeles nearly doubled Pittsburgh’s rushing volume, allowing the Chargers to dictate tempo and keep their offense balanced.

Jaylen Warren Leads Pittsburgh

Jaylen Warren was Pittsburgh’s most productive runner.

Stat Line

• 14 carries
• 70 rushing yards
• 5.0 yards per carry
• 0 touchdowns

His average of five yards per carry indicates that he was effective whenever he received the football. However, with only 14 rushing attempts, Pittsburgh never fully committed to establishing the run. As the deficit grew, the offense relied more heavily on passing, reducing Warren’s opportunities.

Kimani Vidal Controls the Ground Game

Kimani Vidal delivered one of the most important individual performances of the afternoon.

Stat Line

• 25 carries
• 95 rushing yards
• 1 touchdown
• Long run of 12 yards

While Vidal did not produce many explosive runs, his consistency kept the offense moving. Repeated gains of three to six yards placed Herbert in manageable passing situations and helped Los Angeles dominate time of possession.

His touchdown further rewarded an offense that remained patient throughout the game.

Receiving Statistics

Several receivers made impactful plays, but the Chargers generated more explosive gains through the air.

Team Receiving Production

Team	Receptions	Receiving Yards	Touchdowns
Pittsburgh Steelers	16	161	1
Los Angeles Chargers	20	220	1

The numbers closely mirror the quarterback statistics, highlighting the Chargers’ superior passing efficiency.

Pittsburgh’s Top Receivers

DK Metcalf

DK Metcalf led the Steelers in receiving yardage with:

• 3 receptions
• 35 receiving yards

Although he finished as the team’s yardage leader, the Chargers prevented him from generating explosive plays downfield.

Roman Wilson

Roman Wilson recorded:

• 2 receptions
• 35 receiving yards
• 1 touchdown

His touchdown reception represented Pittsburgh’s only trip to the end zone and showcased his ability to capitalize when given an opportunity. Despite limited targets, Wilson made his catches count.

Ladd McConkey Headlines the Chargers

Ladd McConkey produced the game’s biggest receiving performance.

Stat Line

• 4 receptions
• 107 receiving yards
• 1 touchdown
• Long reception of 58 yards

More than half of his receiving yards came on one explosive play, illustrating his ability to stretch the field. His touchdown gave Los Angeles another crucial scoring drive and forced Pittsburgh’s secondary to respect the deep passing threat for the remainder of the game.

Offensive Comparison

When comparing both offenses as complete units, the Chargers displayed greater balance and consistency.

Pittsburgh struggled to sustain long drives because the passing game never found a steady rhythm. The rushing attack showed promise through Jaylen Warren but received too few opportunities to influence the outcome.

Los Angeles attacked in multiple ways. Herbert distributed the football efficiently, Vidal controlled the running game, and McConkey provided explosive receiving plays. That combination made the Chargers difficult to defend and allowed them to score in every phase of the game after the opening quarter.

Just as importantly, the Chargers avoided turnovers, while Pittsburgh’s giveaways repeatedly ended promising possessions. Those mistakes became one of the defining statistical differences in the contest.

Defensive Performance Analysis

While the final score highlights the Chargers’ offensive success, both defenses made significant contributions throughout the game. Pittsburgh consistently pressured Justin Herbert, while Los Angeles excelled at creating turnovers and limiting explosive plays. The difference was that the Chargers converted defensive stops into momentum-changing opportunities.

Team Defensive Comparison

Defensive Category	Pittsburgh Steelers	Los Angeles Chargers
Total Tackles	82	46
Sacks	5	3
Tackles for Loss	11	4
Pass Deflections	5	5
Quarterback Hits	9	5
Interceptions	0	2

At first glance, Pittsburgh’s defensive numbers appear more impressive. The Steelers recorded more tackles, sacks, tackles for loss, and quarterback hits than the Chargers. However, Los Angeles made the biggest defensive plays by forcing turnovers, which had a far greater impact on the outcome.

Patrick Queen Leads the Steelers

Patrick Queen was Pittsburgh’s most productive defender.

Defensive Stats

• 12 total tackles

Queen remained active throughout the contest, consistently limiting gains in both the running and passing game. His performance reflected the overall effort of the Steelers’ defense, which battled hard despite spending considerable time on the field.

The defense repeatedly gave Pittsburgh chances to remain competitive, but the offense could not consistently capitalize.

Chargers Create Game Changing Turnovers

The Chargers’ secondary delivered one of the biggest differences in the game by intercepting Aaron Rodgers twice.

The interception leaders were:

• Donte Jackson, 1 interception with a 21 yard return
• RJ Mickens, 1 interception with a 10 yard return

Neither interception resulted directly in a defensive touchdown, but both shifted momentum toward Los Angeles and prevented Pittsburgh from building scoring drives.

Protecting the football is often the difference between winning and losing in the NFL, and the Chargers demonstrated exactly why.

Daiyan Henley Anchors the Defense

Daiyan Henley finished as Los Angeles’ leading tackler.

Defensive Stats

• 6 total tackles

Although his tackle total was lower than Patrick Queen’s, Henley consistently made stops at important moments while helping contain Pittsburgh’s passing attack.

Special Teams Statistics

Special teams quietly influenced field position throughout the afternoon. From long field goals to reliable punting, both teams received valuable contributions from their specialists.

Field Goal Comparison

Kicker	Field Goals	Long	Extra Points	Total Points
Chris Boswell	1 of 2	59	1 of 1	4
Cameron Dicker	3 of 4	59	2 of 2	11

Cameron Dicker played a major role in the Chargers’ victory by scoring 11 points. His ability to convert three field goals ensured that Los Angeles consistently extended its lead, even when drives stalled short of the end zone.

Chris Boswell connected from an impressive 59 yards but missed another attempt, limiting Pittsburgh’s scoring opportunities.

Punting Performance

Punter	Punts	Yards	Average	Long
Corliss Waitman	4	183	45.8	51
JK Scott	6	263	43.8	55

Both punters handled their responsibilities well.

Waitman averaged nearly 46 yards per punt, while JK Scott frequently helped pin Pittsburgh deeper in its own territory during key stretches of the game.

Kick Return Statistics

Pittsburgh enjoyed slightly better production on kick returns.

Steelers

• Kenny Gainwell
  • 2 returns
  • 61 yards

Team Total

• 3 returns
• 84 yards
• 28.0 yard average

Chargers

• Trayveon Williams
  • 2 returns
  • 51 yards

Team Total

• 3 returns
• 76 yards
• 25.3 yard average

Although the Steelers gained a small advantage in return yardage, it was not enough to overcome the Chargers’ dominance in turnover margin.

Punt Returns

Pittsburgh

• Ke’Shawn Williams
  • 2 returns
  • 11 yards

Los Angeles

• Derius Davis
  • 1 return
  • 5 yards

Neither team generated a significant impact through punt returns, making this one of the quieter aspects of the contest.

Key Team Statistics

Looking at the complete statistical profile helps explain why Los Angeles controlled the game.

Pittsburgh Steelers

• 161 passing yards
• 73 rushing yards
• 234 total offensive yards
• 2 turnovers
• 1 lost fumble
• 5 sacks recorded on defense

Los Angeles Chargers

• 220 passing yards
• 115 rushing yards
• 335 total offensive yards
• 0 interceptions thrown
• No fumbles lost
• Balanced offensive production

The Chargers finished with over 100 more total offensive yards while committing far fewer mistakes. That combination consistently placed Pittsburgh in difficult situations.

Five Moments That Shaped the Game

1. Chargers Force Two Interceptions

The interceptions by Donte Jackson and RJ Mickens prevented Pittsburgh from sustaining offensive momentum and created favorable field position.

2. Ladd McConkey’s Explosive Touchdown

McConkey’s 58 yard reception changed the complexion of the passing game and demonstrated the Chargers’ ability to strike quickly.

3. Kimani Vidal’s Heavy Workload

Twenty five rushing attempts helped Los Angeles control the pace of the game and reduce pressure on Justin Herbert.

4. Steelers Fail to Build on Defensive Pressure

Recording five sacks is normally enough to disrupt an opposing offense. However, Pittsburgh’s offense could not convert those defensive plays into points.

5. Chargers Win the Turnover Battle

Perhaps the biggest statistic of the afternoon was the turnover margin. Los Angeles protected the football while forcing multiple takeaways, giving them a decisive advantage that carried through the entire game.

Standout Player Performances

Although football is the ultimate team sport, several individual performances stood above the rest. Some players delivered consistent production from start to finish, while others made the defining plays that influenced the final result.

Justin Herbert Delivers an Efficient Game

Justin Herbert once again demonstrated why efficiency often matters more than eye catching statistics. His final numbers were not record breaking, but they reflected smart decision making and steady leadership throughout the game.

Key Statistics

• 20 completions on 33 attempts
• 220 passing yards
• 1 touchdown
• 0 interceptions
• 90.5 passer rating

The Steelers’ pass rush brought pressure throughout the afternoon, recording five sacks and nine quarterback hits. Despite that pressure, Herbert remained composed and avoided costly mistakes. Instead of forcing difficult throws, he consistently found open receivers and kept the offense moving.

His ability to protect possession became one of the biggest reasons Los Angeles controlled the game from the second quarter onward.

Kimani Vidal Powers the Running Game

Kimani Vidal played a vital role in helping the Chargers establish offensive balance.

Key Statistics

• 25 rushing attempts
• 95 rushing yards
• 1 rushing touchdown

Although his longest run measured only 12 yards, Vidal repeatedly gained positive yardage. Those steady gains kept the offense ahead of schedule, allowing Los Angeles to mix the run and pass effectively.

His workload also helped control the clock during the second half, limiting Pittsburgh’s opportunities to mount a comeback.

Ladd McConkey Changes the Game

Every game features one explosive performance that shifts momentum, and in this matchup that player was Ladd McConkey.

Key Statistics

• 4 receptions
• 107 receiving yards
• 1 touchdown
• Long reception of 58 yards

McConkey averaged more than 26 yards per reception, making him the most dangerous deep threat on the field. His ability to stretch the defense forced Pittsburgh to respect the vertical passing game, opening additional opportunities for the Chargers’ offense.

Patrick Queen Never Stopped Competing

Despite the loss, Patrick Queen produced one of the best defensive performances of the game.

Key Statistics

• 12 total tackles

Queen consistently found the football and limited additional yardage after contact. His effort reflected Pittsburgh’s defensive determination even as the offense struggled to keep pace.

Jaylen Warren Makes the Most of Limited Opportunities

Jaylen Warren quietly delivered an efficient afternoon despite receiving relatively few carries.

Key Statistics

• 14 rushing attempts
• 70 rushing yards
• 5.0 yards per carry

His average demonstrated that Pittsburgh could move the ball on the ground. However, falling behind on the scoreboard forced the Steelers to rely more heavily on the passing game, reducing Warren’s overall impact.

What the Statistics Reveal

Looking beyond the box score, several themes become clear.

First, Los Angeles played cleaner football. The Chargers committed fewer mistakes, protected possession, and consistently converted scoring opportunities.

Second, offensive balance separated the two teams. Pittsburgh relied heavily on its passing attack after falling behind, while Los Angeles maintained an effective mix of rushing and passing throughout all four quarters.

Third, turnovers proved decisive. Aaron Rodgers’ two interceptions gave the Chargers additional possessions, while Herbert finished the game without throwing one.

Finally, field position remained in the Chargers’ favor for much of the afternoon. Consistent special teams play and disciplined offense allowed Los Angeles to avoid difficult situations and steadily build its lead.

What This Result Means for Both Teams

For the Chargers, this victory improved their record to 7 and 3 while reinforcing their identity as a balanced football team. Strong quarterback play, dependable rushing production, disciplined defense, and reliable special teams combined to produce a complete performance.

The Steelers dropped to 5 and 4 despite another impressive defensive effort. Recording five sacks and numerous tackles behind the line of scrimmage would normally create enough opportunities to win. However, offensive inconsistency and turnovers prevented Pittsburgh from taking advantage of those defensive successes.

As the season continued, this game served as a reminder that winning the turnover battle often matters just as much as winning individual statistical categories.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the November 9, 2025 game between the Steelers and Chargers?

The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Pittsburgh Steelers by a final score of 25 to 10.

Who led the Chargers in passing?

Justin Herbert completed 20 of 33 passes for 220 yards, one touchdown, no interceptions, and finished with a 90.5 passer rating.

Who was Pittsburgh’s leading rusher?

Jaylen Warren led the Steelers with 70 rushing yards on 14 carries, averaging 5.0 yards per attempt.

Which receiver had the most receiving yards?

Ladd McConkey led all receivers with 107 receiving yards on four receptions, including a 58 yard touchdown catch.

How many interceptions did Aaron Rodgers throw?

Aaron Rodgers threw two interceptions while finishing with 161 passing yards and one touchdown.

Which team won the turnover battle?

The Chargers won the turnover battle by forcing two interceptions while committing no interceptions themselves. They also did not lose a fumble, whereas Pittsburgh lost one of its two fumbles.

Conclusion

The pittsburgh steelers vs chargers match player stats highlight a game in which execution mattered more than raw effort. Pittsburgh’s defense produced five sacks, 11 tackles for loss, and constant pressure on Justin Herbert, but the offense struggled to sustain drives and protect the football. Those missed opportunities prevented the Steelers from turning defensive success into points.

Los Angeles delivered the more complete performance in every critical area. Justin Herbert managed the offense efficiently, Kimani Vidal controlled the running game, and Ladd McConkey supplied the explosive plays that stretched Pittsburgh’s defense. Combined with two timely interceptions and dependable special teams, the Chargers consistently maintained momentum and secured a well deserved 25 to 10 victory.

For readers analyzing this matchup, the statistics reveal that football games are rarely decided by a single standout performance. Instead, balanced offense, disciplined defense, effective special teams, and winning the turnover battle combined to shape the outcome of one of the Chargers’ strongest performances of the 2025 season.