Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Seahawks Match Player Stats

The tampa bay buccaneers vs seahawks match player stats from October 5, 2025 tell the story of one of the most productive and tightly contested games of the season. Tampa Bay defeated Seattle 38-35 at Lumen Field, despite the Seahawks producing more total yards, more rushing production, and four passing touchdowns. The difference came from Tampa Bay’s efficiency in key moments, Baker Mayfield’s near flawless passing performance, Rachaad White’s two rushing touchdowns, Lavonte David’s interception, and Chase McLaughlin’s game winning 39 yard field goal. The official NFL gamebook confirms the final score, individual statistics, scoring sequence, and team totals used throughout this analysis.

This was not a game where one team simply dominated from start to finish. Seattle generated 463 total yards compared with Tampa Bay’s 426, averaged 6.1 yards per rushing attempt, and scored five touchdowns. Tampa Bay, however, converted its opportunities with remarkable efficiency. The Buccaneers committed no turnovers, Mayfield threw no interceptions, and Tampa Bay controlled the ball for 33:12 compared with Seattle’s 26:48.

The result makes this matchup especially useful for anyone studying NFL box scores. The team with the better raw yardage numbers did not win. Instead, Tampa Bay combined passing efficiency, turnover control, red zone execution, time of possession, and late game composure to escape Seattle with a three point victory.

Table of Contents

Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Seahawks Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The game was played on Sunday, October 5, 2025, at Lumen Field in Seattle. Tampa Bay entered the contest and finished the game with a 4-1 record, including a perfect 3-0 mark on the road according to the supplied game data. Seattle moved to 3-2 and 1-2 at home.

The scoring pattern shows just how dramatically the game changed after halftime.

Quarter	Tampa Bay	Seattle
First	3	0
Second	10	7
Third	15	14
Fourth	10	14
Final	38	35

Tampa Bay built a 13-7 halftime lead, then the game became an offensive shootout. The Buccaneers moved ahead 28-21 late in the third quarter, but Seattle answered with two fourth quarter touchdowns and briefly took a 35-28 lead.

The Buccaneers responded with a 70 yard touchdown drive that ended with a 11 yard touchdown reception by Sterling Shepard. With 53 seconds remaining, Tampa Bay was positioned for the winning field goal. McLaughlin converted from 39 yards as time expired. The official play-by-play records the decisive sequence and confirms the 38-35 final.

That ending is important when interpreting the player statistics. Seattle’s offense was outstanding, but Tampa Bay’s ability to produce scoring drives without giving the ball away ultimately mattered more.

Baker Mayfield’s Passing Performance

Baker Mayfield was the most efficient quarterback on Tampa Bay’s side and one of the biggest reasons the Buccaneers won.

His final passing line was:

Statistic	Baker Mayfield
Completions	29
Attempts	33
Completion Rate	87.9%
Passing Yards	379
Yards per Attempt	11.5
Touchdowns	2
Interceptions	0
Sacks	1
Sack Yards	9
Long Pass	57 yards
Passer Rating	134.7

Mayfield completed 29 of 33 passes, giving him an 87.9% completion rate. More importantly, his 379 yards came on only 33 attempts. That produced 11.5 yards per attempt, an exceptionally strong figure for a high volume passing performance. The NFL gamebook lists his official passer rating at 134.7.

What stands out is the combination of accuracy and aggressiveness.

A quarterback can post a high completion percentage by throwing short passes repeatedly. Mayfield did not take that approach here. His offense averaged 10.9 yards per pass play including sacks, while his individual passing average was 11.5 yards per attempt.

He also avoided the mistake that could have changed the game. Seattle’s Sam Darnold threw four touchdown passes but also had one interception. Mayfield threw two touchdowns and zero interceptions.

That difference matters in a game decided by three points.

Mayfield’s Decision Making

The most impressive part of Mayfield’s performance was not simply the 379 yards. It was the efficiency with which he generated them.

He attempted 33 passes and completed 29. Only four attempts fell incomplete, and Tampa Bay did not throw an interception.

His performance also included a 57 yard completion, showing that the Buccaneers were able to create explosive plays rather than relying entirely on short throws.

From an analytical perspective, this is a strong example of why completion percentage should not be evaluated separately from yards per attempt. Mayfield combined both metrics effectively.

Sam Darnold’s Four Touchdown Game

Seattle quarterback Sam Darnold produced an excellent statistical performance even though his team lost.

Statistic	Sam Darnold
Completions	28
Attempts	34
Completion Rate	82.4%
Passing Yards	341
Yards per Attempt	10.0
Touchdowns	4
Interceptions	1
Sacks	0
Long Pass	53 yards
Passer Rating	135.4

Darnold completed 28 of 34 passes for 341 yards, four touchdowns, and one interception. His official passer rating was 135.4, slightly higher than Mayfield’s 134.7.

That creates an unusual situation. The losing quarterback actually recorded the higher passer rating and more touchdown passes.

Yet quarterback statistics alone do not determine the winner.

Darnold did his part to keep Seattle in the game. His touchdown passes went to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, AJ Barner twice, and T. Horton. Seattle repeatedly responded whenever Tampa Bay appeared ready to create separation.

The critical problem was the interception. Tampa Bay eventually used its final possession to reach field goal range and win.

This is a useful reminder when interpreting tampa bay buccaneers vs seahawks match player stats: the best individual statistical line does not always belong to the quarterback on the winning team.

Rachaad White Leads Tampa Bay’s Rushing Attack

Tampa Bay’s rushing offense was not efficient by normal NFL standards.

The Buccaneers ran 24 times for only 56 yards, an average of 2.3 yards per carry. Seattle, by comparison, rushed 20 times for 122 yards at 6.1 yards per attempt.

But Tampa Bay did not need a large rushing total to get value from Rachaad White.

White finished with:

14 carries
41 rushing yards
2.9 yards per carry
12 yard long
2 touchdowns

His two rushing touchdowns were crucial. The first came on a 7 yard run in the second quarter. His second touchdown was a 1 yard run late in the third quarter.

This is one of the clearest examples of situational value in the game.

White’s 41 rushing yards were modest, but his two touchdowns directly contributed six points each before extra points. In a game decided by three points, those short yardage finishes were highly valuable.

Kenneth Walker III Was Seattle’s Rushing Standout

Seattle’s running game was considerably more efficient.

Kenneth Walker III led the Seahawks with:

Statistic	Kenneth Walker III
Carries	10
Rushing Yards	86
Average	8.6
Long Run	31 yards
Touchdowns	0

Walker averaged 8.6 yards every time he carried the football. His 31 yard run was Seattle’s longest rushing play of the afternoon.

Seattle also received 36 rushing yards and one touchdown from Zach Charbonnet on nine carries.

Together, Walker and Charbonnet accounted for 122 rushing yards, exactly matching Seattle’s team rushing total.

That production should not be overlooked simply because Seattle lost. The Seahawks established a clear advantage on the ground and generated 6.1 yards per carry compared with Tampa Bay’s 2.3.

The bigger issue was that Tampa Bay’s passing game was efficient enough to overcome the rushing disparity.

Emeka Egbuka Explodes for 163 Receiving Yards

Emeka Egbuka was the biggest receiving star for Tampa Bay.

His final numbers were:

Statistic	Emeka Egbuka
Targets	7
Receptions	7
Receiving Yards	163
Average	23.3
Long Reception	57
Touchdowns	1

Egbuka caught every pass thrown his way and averaged 23.3 yards per reception. His 57 yard reception was Tampa Bay’s longest completion and his 20 yard touchdown reception came during the third quarter.

The combination of volume and explosiveness makes his performance especially notable.

He was not simply accumulating catches through short routes. Every reception produced meaningful yardage, and his average exceeded 20 yards per catch.

For fantasy football analysis, weekly player evaluation, and broader offensive evaluation, this is the type of performance where target efficiency deserves as much attention as target volume.

Seven targets produced seven receptions and 163 yards.

That is exceptional production.

Cade Otton and Tez Johnson Add Important Support

Cade Otton also made a major contribution to Tampa Bay’s passing attack.

Otton caught four passes for 81 yards on five targets. His average was 20.3 yards per reception, and his longest catch went for 27 yards.

Tez Johnson caught all four of his targets for 59 yards. His 14.8 yard average gave Tampa Bay another reliable option outside of Egbuka.

Sterling Shepard was particularly important because his numbers were not as large as Egbuka’s, but his timing was critical. Shepard finished with four catches for 24 yards and a touchdown. That touchdown came with 1:08 remaining in the fourth quarter and tied the game at 35-35.

This is an important distinction between volume statistics and game impact.

Egbuka was Tampa Bay’s leading receiver by yardage. Shepard produced one of the most important catches of the afternoon.

Both contributions mattered, but in different ways.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba Leads Seattle’s Receivers

Jaxon Smith-Njigba was Seattle’s top receiving option.

He finished with:

9 targets
8 receptions
132 yards
16.5 yards per reception
53 yard long
1 touchdown

His 53 yard reception was Seattle’s longest completion of the game. He also caught Seattle’s first touchdown, a 6 yard reception from Darnold with six seconds remaining in the first half.

Smith-Njigba was efficient while also handling the largest receiving workload among Seattle players.

His eight catches accounted for a substantial portion of Darnold’s 28 completions, and his 132 yards helped Seattle maintain an explosive passing attack.

AJ Barner Scores Twice

AJ Barner had a particularly valuable red zone performance.

He caught seven passes on seven targets for 53 yards and two touchdowns. His longest reception was only 11 yards, which shows how different his role was from Smith-Njigba’s.

Barner’s value came primarily near the goal line.

His two touchdown receptions helped Seattle repeatedly answer Tampa Bay’s scoring drives. The first came on a 2 yard touchdown in the third quarter, while the second came on a 6 yard touchdown early in the fourth quarter.

This is another reason raw receiving yards can sometimes provide an incomplete picture.

Smith-Njigba led Seattle in yardage. Barner led the team in receiving touchdowns.

Both were central to the Seahawks’ offensive success.

Cooper Kupp’s Role

Cooper Kupp caught six passes for 59 yards on nine targets.

His 9.8 yards per reception average was considerably lower than Smith-Njigba’s 16.5, but Kupp’s nine targets tied for the highest target total on Seattle.

His role therefore appears more volume oriented in this particular box score.

The important analytical point is that Kupp was part of a balanced Seattle passing distribution. Darnold did not rely on one receiver for every meaningful possession. Smith-Njigba, Kupp, Barner, and T. Horton all contributed.

That diversity helped Seattle score 35 points.

Tampa Bay’s Defensive Impact

Tampa Bay’s defense did not dominate the box score in conventional sack production.

The Buccaneers recorded zero sacks, while Seattle had one.

However, Tampa Bay generated one interception, and Lavonte David was responsible for it. He returned the interception three yards.

David also led Tampa Bay with nine combined tackles, including five solo tackles. He recorded one tackle for loss and one pass defense in the official defensive statistics.

His interception was particularly important because Seattle’s offense was otherwise extremely productive.

The Seahawks finished with 463 total yards, 27 first downs, and 35 points. The Buccaneers therefore needed timely defensive plays rather than constant defensive dominance.

David provided one of those plays.

Coby Bryant Leads Seattle’s Tacklers

Coby Bryant led Seattle with eight combined tackles, including seven solo tackles and one tackle for loss.

Seattle’s defense recorded one sack and six tackles for loss, but Tampa Bay’s passing efficiency prevented the Seahawks from consistently disrupting Mayfield.

The contrast is revealing.

Seattle had more total defensive tackles in the gamebook’s defensive statistics and created some backfield disruption. Tampa Bay, however, protected Mayfield well enough to complete 29 passes and generate 379 passing yards.

Defensive volume is therefore not automatically equivalent to defensive success.

Turnovers Were a Major Difference

Turnovers were one of the clearest statistical separators.

Tampa Bay:

0 turnovers
0 interceptions thrown
0 fumbles lost
1 defensive interception

Seattle:

1 interception thrown
1 fumble lost
0 defensive interceptions

The official team statistics show Tampa Bay finished with no turnovers while Seattle lost two possessions.

That is especially significant because the total yardage favored Seattle.

Seattle produced 463 yards against Tampa Bay’s 426, a difference of 37 yards.

Yet the Seahawks lost the turnover battle 2-0.

This is a classic example of why football cannot be reduced to total yardage. A team can move the ball more effectively and still lose if it gives away possessions at critical moments.

Red Zone Efficiency Tells Another Story

Both teams were extremely dangerous in the red zone, but there was one important distinction.

Seattle scored touchdowns on all four of its red zone opportunities.

Tampa Bay went 4 for 6 in the red zone.

That means Seattle was perfect when it reached the red zone, while Tampa Bay left two scoring opportunities without touchdowns.

At first glance, that looks like a major advantage for Seattle.

However, Tampa Bay compensated with field goals.

Chase McLaughlin converted all three of his field goal attempts, including kicks from 30, 36, and 39 yards. The final 39 yard field goal won the game.

Seattle’s Jason Myers missed his only field goal attempt.

The kicking comparison was therefore decisive:

Kicker	FG	XP	Points
Chase McLaughlin	3/3	3/3	12
Jason Myers	0/1	5/5	5

McLaughlin scored 12 points by himself.

In a three point game, that contribution is impossible to ignore.

Special Teams Created Hidden Yardage

Seattle actually held the advantage in kickoff return yardage.

The Seahawks recorded seven kickoff returns for 196 yards, averaging 28.0 yards per return.

Dareke Young led the way with five returns for 154 yards, an average of 30.8 yards and a long of 50.

Tampa Bay’s Josh Williams returned five kickoffs for 129 yards, averaging 25.8 yards per return.

Seattle therefore gained 67 more kickoff return yards.

That advantage did not translate into victory.

This is another useful lesson when studying player statistics. Special teams can create excellent field position without necessarily determining the final outcome. Offensive execution and turnover control can still outweigh a return yardage advantage.

Time of Possession Favored Tampa Bay

Tampa Bay held the football for 33:12.

Seattle possessed it for 26:48.

The difference was 6:24.

That does not appear enormous in isolation, but it is meaningful in a game where both offenses were highly efficient.

Tampa Bay ran 58 offensive plays compared with Seattle’s 54.

The Buccaneers therefore had four more offensive plays despite gaining fewer total yards.

That combination suggests Tampa Bay was more interested in sustaining possessions and limiting Seattle’s opportunities.

Seattle’s offense was more explosive on a per play basis, averaging 8.6 yards per offensive play compared with Tampa Bay’s 7.3.

Tampa Bay countered that efficiency gap with possession time and error-free football.

Third Down and Fourth Down Performance

Third down performance was strong from both teams.

Tampa Bay converted 7 of 11 third downs, or 63.6%.

Seattle converted 6 of 9, or 66.7%.

Seattle had the slightly better third down rate, but Tampa Bay had more third down opportunities.

The bigger difference came on fourth down.

Seattle converted its only fourth down attempt.

Tampa Bay did not attempt a fourth down.

That tells us Tampa Bay’s offense generally stayed ahead of the chains enough to avoid desperation fourth down situations.

It also reflects a conservative but efficient game management approach.

The Game Was Won in the Final Minutes

The fourth quarter provides the clearest explanation for the final result.

Seattle entered the fourth quarter trailing 28-21.

The Seahawks tied the game at 28-28 on Barner’s second touchdown.

Seattle then moved ahead 35-28 on T. Horton’s 21 yard touchdown reception with 3:18 remaining.

At that point, Tampa Bay had very little room for error.

Mayfield responded with a five play, 70 yard drive.

The final touchdown came on an 11 yard pass to Shepard with 1:08 left, tying the game at 35-35.

Tampa Bay then recovered the ball after Seattle’s ensuing possession ended with an interception. The Buccaneers moved 14 yards in five plays and reached the Seattle 21 yard line before stopping the clock for the winning field goal.

McLaughlin converted from 39 yards as the clock reached zero.

That sequence is the central story behind the box score.

Why Tampa Bay Won Despite Fewer Total Yards

The most interesting part of this matchup is that Seattle won several conventional statistical categories.

Seattle had:

More total yards
More rushing yards
Better yards per rushing attempt
More points from touchdowns
More kickoff return yards
More total first downs
A slightly better third down conversion rate

Tampa Bay had:

Zero turnovers
One defensive interception
More time of possession
More offensive plays
Three made field goals
Zero missed field goals
A quarterback who threw no interceptions
Two rushing touchdowns from White

The winning formula was therefore not statistical dominance in one category.

It was efficiency across several high leverage areas.

The Buccaneers did not need to outrush Seattle. They needed to avoid mistakes, keep Mayfield protected, exploit Seattle’s secondary through the passing game, and convert scoring opportunities into points.

They accomplished those objectives.

A Closer Look at Offensive Efficiency

The two offenses took different routes to 35-plus point production.

Tampa Bay generated 426 total yards from 58 offensive plays.

Seattle generated 463 yards from 54 plays.

That means Seattle produced more yards on fewer plays.

The official figures work out to approximately:

Tampa Bay: 7.3 yards per offensive play
Seattle: 8.6 yards per offensive play

Seattle was more explosive overall.

Tampa Bay was more controlled.

The Buccaneers also had 33:12 of possession, which indicates that the offense was capable of sustaining drives even without consistently producing rushing yardage.

Mayfield’s 29 completions were central to that approach.

What the Player Stats Say About Each Team

The numbers reveal two very different offensive identities.

Tampa Bay

Tampa Bay was heavily dependent on the passing game.

Mayfield produced 379 passing yards while the entire rushing attack generated only 56 yards.

Egbuka’s 163 receiving yards were the most explosive individual contribution.

White’s two touchdowns gave the offense reliable finishing ability near the goal line.

McLaughlin then supplied the difference in field goal production.

Seattle

Seattle had greater balance between its running and passing production.

Walker produced 86 rushing yards.

The team finished with 122 rushing yards.

Darnold added 341 passing yards and four touchdown passes.

Smith-Njigba contributed 132 receiving yards, while Barner scored twice.

The Seahawks therefore moved the ball through multiple channels.

The problem was not offensive capability.

The problem was that two lost possessions and a missed field goal created a margin that their impressive offensive production could not overcome.

What These Stats Mean for Player Evaluation

A good player evaluation should separate volume, efficiency, and situational impact.

For example, White’s 41 rushing yards might look ordinary compared with Walker’s 86. But White scored twice.

Mayfield threw for 379 yards and two touchdowns, while Darnold threw for 341 yards and four touchdowns. Darnold’s touchdown total was better, but his interception and Seattle’s lost fumble contributed to the defeat.

Egbuka caught seven passes for 163 yards. Barner caught seven for 53 yards and two touchdowns.

There is no single statistic that captures all of those contributions.

The best approach is to combine:

Volume
Efficiency
Explosive plays
Turnovers
Touchdowns
Situational performance
Team outcome

That framework produces a more accurate interpretation than simply ranking players by yardage.

Most Important Player Performances

Based strictly on the game statistics and game context, several players deserve special recognition.

Emeka Egbuka

Egbuka was Tampa Bay’s explosive receiving force. Seven catches on seven targets for 163 yards and a touchdown is an outstanding performance.

Baker Mayfield

Mayfield completed 29 of 33 passes for 379 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. His accuracy and ball security were fundamental to Tampa Bay’s victory.

Rachaad White

White’s 41 rushing yards were not spectacular, but his two touchdowns gave Tampa Bay important scoring production.

Lavonte David

David led Tampa Bay in tackles and recorded the team’s only interception.

Sam Darnold

Darnold produced 341 yards and four touchdowns while maintaining a 135.4 passer rating. His performance would normally be enough to put his team in position to win.

Jaxon Smith-Njigba

Smith-Njigba caught eight passes for 132 yards and a touchdown. He was Seattle’s primary explosive receiving threat.

AJ Barner

Barner caught seven passes and scored twice. His red zone production kept Seattle within striking distance throughout the second half.

Chase McLaughlin

McLaughlin converted three field goals and three extra points for 12 total points. His 39 yard field goal decided the game.

What to Look for When Reading Similar NFL Box Scores

The Tampa Bay and Seattle matchup provides a useful template for evaluating future games.

Do not stop with passing yards.

Instead, ask:

Did the quarterback protect the football?

Mayfield did. Darnold did not quite match that standard because of his interception.

Did the team finish drives?

Both teams scored frequently, but Tampa Bay supplemented touchdowns with three field goals.

Which team won the possession battle?

Tampa Bay held the ball for more than six additional minutes.

Which players created explosive plays?

Egbuka, Smith-Njigba, Walker, and others produced major gains.

Were special teams reliable?

McLaughlin was perfect. Myers missed his only field goal attempt.

Did the defense create a game changing turnover?

Tampa Bay did. Seattle did not.

These questions provide more context than a simple list of yards and touchdowns.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between Tampa Bay and Seattle?

The Tampa Bay Buccaneers defeated the Seattle Seahawks 38-35 on October 5, 2025, at Lumen Field.

How many yards did Baker Mayfield throw for?

Baker Mayfield completed 29 of 33 passes for 379 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions. His official passer rating was 134.7.

How many touchdowns did Sam Darnold throw?

Sam Darnold threw four touchdown passes for Seattle. He completed 28 of 34 attempts for 341 yards and one interception.

Who was Tampa Bay’s leading receiver?

Emeka Egbuka led Tampa Bay with seven receptions for 163 yards and one touchdown. His longest reception was 57 yards.

Who led Seattle in rushing?

Kenneth Walker III led Seattle with 86 rushing yards on 10 carries. He averaged 8.6 yards per carry and had a 31 yard long run.

Who kicked the game winning field goal?

Chase McLaughlin kicked the game winning 39 yard field goal as time expired. He finished the game 3-for-3 on field goal attempts and scored 12 points.

Conclusion

The tampa bay buccaneers vs seahawks match player stats show why football games cannot be judged by total yardage alone.

Seattle produced 463 total yards and 122 rushing yards. The Seahawks also received four touchdown passes from Darnold and two touchdown receptions from Barner. Smith-Njigba added 132 receiving yards, while Walker averaged 8.6 yards per carry.

Tampa Bay answered with greater passing efficiency, better ball security, longer possession time, and perfect field goal kicking.

Mayfield’s 379 yards and zero interceptions gave Tampa Bay a stable offensive foundation. Egbuka’s 163 receiving yards supplied the explosive element. White’s two rushing touchdowns helped finish drives. David’s interception gave the defense a critical takeaway. McLaughlin then converted every kick he attempted, including the 39 yard field goal that ended the contest.

The final numbers therefore tell a more nuanced story than the 38-35 score suggests.

Seattle was arguably more explosive on a per-play basis. Tampa Bay was more efficient at protecting possessions and capitalizing on the opportunities that mattered most. The Buccaneers had 426 total yards compared with Seattle’s 463, but they avoided turnovers and held the ball for 33:12.

That combination ultimately separated the teams.

For readers studying individual performances, the biggest lesson is to evaluate box scores through several lenses at once. Passing efficiency, rushing efficiency, receiving production, turnovers, red zone execution, field goal accuracy, and late game performance all contributed to the final outcome.

The official NFL gamebook is the best primary reference for the complete scoring sequence and individual statistics. official NFL gamebook