Los Angeles Rams vs Arizona Cardinals Match Player Stats

The los angeles rams vs arizona cardinals match player stats tell the story of a dominant Los Angeles performance in a 45-17 victory over Arizona at State Farm Stadium. Matthew Stafford delivered three touchdown passes without an interception, Puka Nacua produced 167 receiving yards and two touchdowns, and the Rams rushing attack added 249 yards on the ground. Arizona moved the ball through the air but struggled badly to run the football, while its defense failed to record a sack.

One important date correction is worth making before looking at the numbers: the official NFL record lists this Week 14 game as December 7, 2025, not December 8. The final score, 45-17, and the statistical details provided for this matchup align with the official NFL game record. official NFL game center

This was not simply a game where one team scored more points. The statistics show a clear difference in efficiency, balance, quarterback protection, explosive plays, and defensive pressure. Los Angeles controlled the game through multiple offensive avenues, while Arizona became increasingly one-dimensional as the contest progressed.

Game Overview

The Los Angeles Rams entered the matchup with a 10-3 record, including a strong 5-2 mark on the road. Arizona entered at 3-10 overall and 1-6 at home.

The final score was:

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Los Angeles Rams	10	14	14	7	45
Arizona Cardinals	7	3	0	7	17

The quarter-by-quarter scoring is particularly revealing. Arizona actually led 7-3 early before Los Angeles settled into the game. The Rams then scored 14 points in both the second and third quarters, turning a competitive opening into a decisive result.

By halftime, Los Angeles had established control. The third quarter was even more damaging for Arizona because the Cardinals were shut out while the Rams added another 14 points.

The final seven points scored by Arizona in the fourth quarter did little to change the outcome.

The statistical shape of the game

The most important numbers were:

• Rams passing: 281 yards
• Rams rushing: 249 yards
• Rams total offensive production: 530 yards
• Cardinals passing: 271 yards
• Cardinals rushing: 51 yards
• Cardinals total offensive production: 322 yards
• Rams passing touchdowns: 3
• Cardinals passing touchdowns: 2
• Rams rushing touchdowns: 3
• Cardinals rushing touchdowns: 0
• Rams sacks allowed: 0
• Cardinals sacks allowed: 3
• Rams interceptions: 1
• Cardinals interceptions: 0

The difference in rushing production is especially important. Los Angeles averaged 6.9 yards per rushing attempt as a team, while Arizona averaged only 3.6.

That created a major strategic advantage for the Rams.

Los Angeles Rams vs Arizona Cardinals Match Player Stats

The los angeles rams vs arizona cardinals match player stats show that Los Angeles won through balance rather than relying on a single statistical category.

Matthew Stafford controlled the passing game. Blake Corum and Kyren Williams combined to provide a powerful rushing foundation. Puka Nacua supplied the explosive receiving production. Meanwhile, the Rams defense generated pressure and created a turnover.

Arizona had several productive individual performances, especially from Michael Wilson, but those numbers did not translate into enough overall offensive efficiency.

Matthew Stafford’s Quarterback Performance

Matthew Stafford completed 22 of 31 passes for 281 yards, three touchdowns and zero interceptions.

His key passing numbers were:

Statistic	Matthew Stafford
Completions	22
Attempts	31
Completion rate	71.0%
Passing yards	281
Yards per attempt	9.1
Touchdowns	3
Interceptions	0
Sacks	0
QBR	86.7
Passer rating	131.2

The 131.2 passer rating is one of the clearest indicators of how efficiently Stafford operated.

He was not asked to throw the ball 40 or 50 times. Instead, Los Angeles created favorable situations with its rushing attack and then allowed Stafford to attack efficiently.

His 9.1 yards per attempt also stands out.

That figure shows that the Rams were not simply completing short throws to accumulate yardage. They were producing meaningful gains through the passing game while avoiding the negative plays that can derail an offense.

The zero interceptions are equally important.

A quarterback can accumulate impressive yardage and still put his team in difficult situations with turnovers. Stafford avoided that problem completely.

The combination of three touchdown passes, zero interceptions, zero sacks and 9.1 yards per attempt explains why his performance was so effective.

Stafford’s efficiency mattered more than volume

One of the biggest lessons from this game is that quarterback volume does not automatically equal quarterback impact.

Stafford attempted only 31 passes, yet Los Angeles generated 281 passing yards and three touchdowns.

That efficiency was possible because the Rams rushing game forced Arizona to respect the line of scrimmage. Once the defense had to account for the run, Stafford had better opportunities to attack through the air.

This is an important distinction when evaluating NFL quarterback performances.

A 40-attempt game can look impressive on a box score, but if those attempts produce modest efficiency and several turnovers, the overall performance can be less valuable than a 31-attempt game like Stafford’s.

Puka Nacua Was the Offensive Standout

If one player deserves special attention in the receiving statistics, it is Puka Nacua.

Nacua finished with:

• 7 receptions
• 167 receiving yards
• 23.9 yards per reception
• 2 touchdowns
• 32-yard long reception
• 11 targets

His 167 yards represented nearly 60 percent of Stafford’s passing yardage.

That is extraordinary production from one receiver.

Nacua also averaged 23.9 yards per reception, showing that his impact was not based simply on accumulating catches. He was producing explosive gains.

The 11 targets are important as well.

Los Angeles did not randomly stumble into Nacua’s production. Stafford repeatedly looked in his direction, and Nacua converted that opportunity into major yardage.

Why Nacua’s performance changed the game

The value of Nacua’s performance goes beyond the raw receiving total.

When a receiver consistently produces explosive plays, the defense must adjust.

That can create opportunities for:

• Running backs underneath
• Tight ends in intermediate areas
• Other wide receivers against single coverage
• Play-action concepts
• Short throws that become longer gains after the catch

Nacua’s production therefore had a broader impact on the Rams offense.

His two touchdowns also gave Los Angeles finishing ability in the red zone.

A team can move the ball between the 20-yard lines and still struggle to score. The Rams did not have that problem in this matchup.

Blake Corum Delivered a Breakout Rushing Performance

Blake Corum was one of the most important statistical surprises of the game.

He recorded:

Statistic	Blake Corum
Carries	12
Rushing yards	128
Average	10.7
Long	48
Touchdowns	2

Corum averaged 10.7 yards per carry.

That is a remarkable figure, particularly considering he received only 12 carries.

His 48-yard run was the type of explosive play that can completely change a defensive game plan.

Two rushing touchdowns also made his performance directly relevant to the scoreboard.

Corum’s efficiency versus workload

The interesting part of Corum’s performance is that he did not need a huge workload to make a major impact.

Twelve carries produced 128 yards.

That means the Rams were able to generate explosive rushing production without depending on one running back for 25 or 30 attempts.

This kind of efficiency is valuable late in the season because a balanced backfield can help preserve player workloads while maintaining offensive production.

Kyren Williams Added Another Reliable Rushing Threat

Kyren Williams contributed 13 carries for 84 yards and one touchdown.

His numbers were:

• 13 carries
• 84 yards
• 6.5 yards per carry
• 18-yard long
• 1 rushing touchdown

Williams did not match Corum’s explosive average, but 6.5 yards per carry is still excellent.

More importantly, Williams gave Los Angeles another legitimate rushing option.

The Rams therefore did not have to depend entirely on Corum.

The combination of Corum and Williams produced 212 rushing yards on 25 attempts.

That equals an average of 8.5 yards per carry between the two backs.

This is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the Rams’ offensive dominance.

Ronnie Rivers also contributed

Ronnie Rivers added:

• 8 carries
• 41 yards
• 5.1 yards per carry

His production helped maintain the overall efficiency of the rushing attack.

When Rivers is included, the Rams had three players producing positive rushing output at meaningful efficiency levels.

Jimmy Garoppolo had three carries for minus-4 yards, but that did not materially change the overall picture.

Rams Team Rushing Was the Difference Maker

The Rams finished with 36 rushing attempts for 249 yards.

That equals 6.9 yards per attempt.

Arizona, by comparison, had only 14 rushing attempts for 51 yards.

That is 3.6 yards per attempt.

The contrast is enormous.

Rushing Category	Rams	Cardinals
Attempts	36	14
Yards	249	51
Average	6.9	3.6
Touchdowns	3	0
Long	48	11

Los Angeles produced 198 more rushing yards than Arizona.

The Rams also scored three rushing touchdowns while Arizona scored none.

This created an extremely difficult situation for the Cardinals defense.

If Arizona committed extra defenders to stop the run, Stafford had opportunities to attack through the air.

If Arizona stayed lighter in the box, the Rams could continue running efficiently.

That is what offensive balance looks like in practical terms.

Arizona’s Passing Game Had Individual Success

Jacoby Brissett completed 25 of 44 passes for 271 yards, two touchdowns and one interception.

His numbers were:

Statistic	Jacoby Brissett
Completions	25
Attempts	44
Completion rate	56.8%
Passing yards	271
Yards per attempt	6.2
Touchdowns	2
Interceptions	1
Sacks	3
QBR	47.0
Passer rating	80.8

At first glance, 271 passing yards and two touchdowns look respectable.

However, the context matters.

Brissett attempted 44 passes, significantly more than Stafford’s 31, yet produced fewer passing yards.

His 6.2 yards per attempt was also well below Stafford’s 9.1.

The three sacks further increased the pressure on Arizona.

The passing volume was partly a consequence of the game situation

Arizona’s 44 pass attempts should not automatically be interpreted as evidence that Brissett simply had a more aggressive passing game.

The game script matters.

Once Los Angeles established a large lead, Arizona had fewer opportunities to rely on the running game.

The Cardinals finished with only 14 rushing attempts.

That forced Brissett to carry much of the offensive workload through the air.

The result was a large passing volume but less efficient overall production.

Michael Wilson Led Arizona’s Receivers

Michael Wilson was the standout Cardinals receiver.

He finished with:

• 11 receptions
• 142 yards
• 12.9 yards per reception
• 2 touchdowns
• 25-yard long
• 16 targets

Wilson’s 16 targets were the most prominent target volume in the game.

He accounted for more than half of Arizona’s receiving yardage.

His two touchdowns also accounted for all of Arizona’s receiving touchdowns.

This was a strong individual performance even though the team lost by 28 points.

That distinction matters.

Player statistics should always be interpreted within team context. A receiver can perform exceptionally well while his team struggles because of defensive breakdowns, poor rushing efficiency, turnovers, or unfavorable field position.

Wilson’s performance is a good example.

Trey McBride provided another useful outlet

Trey McBride recorded:

• 5 receptions
• 58 yards
• 11.6 yards per reception
• 27-yard long
• 9 targets
• 0 touchdowns

McBride gave Brissett a reliable intermediate option.

His 27-yard reception demonstrated that Arizona could generate explosive passing plays.

The problem was consistency.

Arizona needed more than isolated passing success to keep pace with an offense producing 530 yards.

Rams Receiving Distribution

Although Nacua dominated the receiving yardage, the Rams still spread the ball around.

The main receiving figures were:

Player	Rec	Yards	Avg	TD	Long	Targets
Puka Nacua	7	167	23.9	2	32	11
Colby Parkinson	3	32	10.7	1	14	5
Davante Adams	4	29	7.3	0	10	6
Davis Allen	2	21	10.5	0	12	2
Kyren Williams	2	13	6.5	0	9	2

The Rams finished with 22 receptions for 281 yards and three touchdowns on 31 targets.

Nacua was clearly the primary weapon, but the rest of the receiving group still contributed enough to prevent Arizona from focusing exclusively on one player.

Davante Adams, for example, had four receptions for 29 yards.

His yardage total was modest, but his six targets meant Arizona still had to account for another established receiving threat.

Arizona Receiving Distribution

Arizona finished with 25 receptions for 271 yards, two touchdowns and 44 targets.

Player	Rec	Yards	Avg	TD	Long	Targets
Michael Wilson	11	142	12.9	2	25	16
Trey McBride	5	58	11.6	0	27	9
Jalen Brooks	2	32	16.0	0	20	3
Michael Carter	2	18	9.0	0	0	4
Bam Knight	3	18	6.0	0	9	6

The biggest difference between the two passing games was efficiency.

Arizona completed more passes, 25 compared with 22, but Los Angeles generated significantly more yards per completion and per attempt.

That difference ultimately translated into more explosive offensive possessions for the Rams.

Defensive Player Stats

The defensive statistics provide another important part of the story.

Los Angeles recorded:

• 50 total tackles
• 34 solo tackles
• 3 sacks
• 1 tackle for loss
• 6 pass defenses
• 11 quarterback hits
• 1 interception

Arizona recorded:

• 80 total tackles
• 32 solo tackles
• 0 sacks
• 0 tackles for loss
• 2 pass defenses
• 2 quarterback hits
• 0 interceptions

The most striking number is quarterback pressure.

Los Angeles produced 11 quarterback hits and three sacks.

Arizona produced only two quarterback hits and no sacks.

That is a major difference.

Omar Speights led the Rams in tackles

Omar Speights recorded six total tackles and five solo tackles, making him the Rams’ leading tackler based on the supplied game statistics.

His contribution illustrates that defensive impact is not always measured through sacks or interceptions.

Linebackers and defensive backs can influence plays by closing running lanes, making tackles in space, and limiting yards after the catch.

Nate Landman created the turnover

Nate Landman recorded the Rams’ lone interception.

Arizona did not record an interception.

Los Angeles therefore finished the game with a positive turnover margin.

The Rams also had no fumbles, while Arizona had no fumbles.

That means the only turnover in the game was Landman’s interception.

In a game decided by 28 points, turnovers were not the only reason for the result, but the Rams did avoid giving Arizona extra possessions.

Arizona’s Defensive Numbers Tell a Different Story

Owen Pappoe led Arizona with 10 total tackles and six solo tackles.

His tackle total was the highest among the defensive players listed for either team.

But high tackle totals can sometimes reflect defensive workload rather than defensive dominance.

Arizona recorded 80 total tackles compared with 50 for Los Angeles.

That does not mean Arizona’s defense played better.

In this context, the higher number partly reflects the fact that the Cardinals defense spent a large amount of time dealing with a highly productive Rams offense.

The more revealing numbers are the sacks, tackles for loss, quarterback hits and pass defenses.

Arizona had zero sacks, zero tackles for loss, two quarterback hits and two pass defenses.

Those numbers suggest that the Cardinals struggled to disrupt the Rams’ offensive rhythm.

The Offensive Line Impact

Individual offensive linemen do not always appear prominently in a standard box score, but their impact can be inferred from the team statistics.

Stafford was not sacked.

Arizona’s Brissett was sacked three times.

That difference matters because sacks create lost yardage, unfavorable down-and-distance situations and potential fumbles.

The Rams also produced 249 rushing yards.

Taken together, the rushing efficiency and zero sacks allowed indicate that Los Angeles consistently won the line-of-scrimmage battle.

This is one of the most important insights hidden beneath the headline statistics.

A quarterback can only maintain efficiency when the protection gives him time, and a running back can only generate explosive rushing plays when blocking creates usable lanes.

The Rams achieved both.

Special Teams Statistics

Special teams did not decide the game, but several numbers are worth noting.

Rams kicking

Harrison Mevis converted:

• 1 of 1 field goals
• 26-yard long
• 6 of 6 extra points
• 9 total points

His perfect field goal and extra-point record ensured that Los Angeles did not leave easy points on the scoreboard.

Arizona kicking

Chad Ryland went:

• 1 of 2 field goals
• 38-yard long
• 2 of 2 extra points
• 5 total points

The missed field goal was one lost scoring opportunity for Arizona.

Kick returns

Los Angeles recorded 84 kick-return yards on three returns.

Jordan Whittington had two returns for 54 yards, while Ronnie Rivers added a 30-yard return.

Arizona’s Jalen Brooks had three kick returns for 66 yards.

Punt returns

Xavier Smith gave Los Angeles 46 punt-return yards on three returns, averaging 15.3 yards per return.

Arizona had no punt returns.

These numbers provided the Rams with additional field-position value.

Punting Comparison

Los Angeles punter Ethan Evans recorded:

• 3 punts
• 140 yards
• 46.7-yard average
• 56-yard long
• 2 touchbacks

Arizona punter Matt Haack recorded:

• 5 punts
• 271 yards
• 54.2-yard average
• 57-yard long
• 2 punts inside the 20

Arizona’s higher punting volume is another reflection of the overall game.

The Cardinals had five punts compared with three for Los Angeles.

Even though Haack averaged more yards per punt, the Rams’ offense generated enough successful possessions that Los Angeles did not need to punt as often.

What the Score Does Not Tell You

The final score, 45-17, clearly indicates a blowout.

But the player statistics explain why it became a blowout.

There were five major factors.

1. Los Angeles was dramatically better on the ground

The Rams gained 249 rushing yards.

Arizona gained 51.

That 198-yard difference gave Los Angeles control of possession, down-and-distance situations and defensive alignment.

2. Stafford was more efficient

Stafford produced 281 yards on 31 attempts with three touchdowns and no interceptions.

Brissett produced 271 yards on 44 attempts with two touchdowns and one interception.

The difference was not simply yardage.

It was efficiency.

3. Nacua produced explosive receiving plays

Nacua’s 167 yards and two touchdowns gave the Rams a consistent big-play threat.

His 23.9-yard average was particularly damaging.

4. Arizona could not pressure Stafford

Three sacks and 11 quarterback hits for Los Angeles versus zero sacks and two quarterback hits for Arizona created a major protection advantage.

5. The Rams converted offensive production into touchdowns

Los Angeles scored three passing touchdowns and three rushing touchdowns.

Arizona scored two passing touchdowns and no rushing touchdowns.

That balance made it difficult for Arizona to respond.

Three Advanced Takeaways From the Player Stats

The box score supports several broader football conclusions.

Balance creates defensive uncertainty

Los Angeles did not have to choose between running and passing.

The Rams produced 249 rushing yards and 281 passing yards.

That near-even production is a sign of a genuinely balanced offensive performance.

When an offense can threaten defenses horizontally and vertically, play-calling becomes much more difficult to defend.

Efficiency is more useful than raw volume

Brissett threw 44 passes.

Stafford threw 31.

Yet Stafford produced 281 yards compared with Brissett’s 271.

This is why raw passing attempts should never be analyzed without efficiency statistics.

Yards per attempt, touchdown rate, interception rate and sacks provide more useful context.

Defensive disruption matters

Arizona’s 80 tackles might initially appear impressive.

But the defense recorded no sacks and only two quarterback hits.

Los Angeles recorded 50 tackles, three sacks, 11 quarterback hits and an interception.

The Rams were more disruptive even with fewer total tackles.

This is a useful lesson for anyone analyzing defensive box scores.

Comparing the Key Players

The most influential performances can be summarized as follows:

Matthew Stafford: 22/31, 281 yards, 3 TD, 0 INT, 131.2 rating.

Puka Nacua: 7 receptions, 167 yards, 2 TD.

Blake Corum: 12 carries, 128 yards, 2 TD.

Kyren Williams: 13 carries, 84 yards, 1 TD.

Jacoby Brissett: 25/44, 271 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT.

Michael Wilson: 11 receptions, 142 yards, 2 TD.

Trey McBride: 5 receptions, 58 yards.

Omar Speights: 6 tackles, 5 solo.

Owen Pappoe: 10 tackles, 6 solo.

Nate Landman: 1 interception.

If the question is which players had the biggest influence on the final result, Stafford, Nacua, Corum and Williams form the strongest group for Los Angeles.

For Arizona, Wilson was the clearest individual offensive standout.

Why Puka Nacua’s Numbers Matter for Future Analysis

A common mistake when analyzing a single NFL game is to treat the leading receiver’s statistics as an isolated event.

Nacua’s performance should instead be evaluated through target volume, efficiency and scoring impact.

He received 11 targets and caught seven.

That means he converted 63.6 percent of his targets into receptions while averaging 23.9 yards per catch.

His two touchdowns also show that the production reached the most valuable part of the field.

This combination makes his performance more meaningful than a simple 167-yard headline.

Why the Rams Rushing Numbers Are Even More Important

The Rams’ 249 rushing yards are arguably the most important team statistic in the entire matchup.

The reason is that rushing efficiency influenced everything else.

A successful running game:

1. Creates manageable down-and-distance situations.
2. Forces defenders closer to the line of scrimmage.
3. Creates opportunities for play action.
4. Reduces pressure on the quarterback.
5. Helps control game tempo.
6. Creates scoring opportunities near the goal line.

The Rams achieved all of those benefits.

Corum averaged 10.7 yards per carry.

Williams averaged 6.5.

Rivers averaged 5.1.

As a group, Los Angeles averaged 6.9 yards per rushing attempt.

That is an exceptional foundation for an offense.

Why Arizona’s 51 Rushing Yards Were So Costly

Arizona’s rushing statistics tell the opposite story.

The Cardinals ran the ball only 14 times for 51 yards.

That works out to 3.6 yards per carry.

No rushing touchdowns were recorded.

Once the Rams established a lead, Arizona had fewer reasons to continue running the ball.

That created a cycle:

Arizona fell behind, Arizona passed more, Los Angeles could focus more defensive attention on the passing game, and Arizona struggled to sustain enough efficient drives to close the gap.

This is one reason game script matters when interpreting player statistics.

How to Read These Stats for Fantasy Football Analysis

Although this article focuses on the actual game rather than fantasy projections, the statistics also provide useful fantasy analysis.

Puka Nacua’s combination of receptions, yardage and touchdowns made him the obvious standout.

Blake Corum’s 128 rushing yards and two touchdowns also produced an exceptional fantasy profile.

Kyren Williams added a rushing touchdown and 84 yards, making his performance valuable despite sharing the backfield.

For Arizona, Michael Wilson’s 142 receiving yards and two touchdowns made him the strongest fantasy performer on the Cardinals.

However, single-game fantasy production should not automatically be used as a prediction for future games.

Target volume, offensive role, injuries, opponent defensive tendencies and expected game script all need to be considered.

What Coaches and Analysts Can Learn From the Game

The game provides several practical lessons.

First, offensive balance creates more options.

Second, explosive plays can quickly turn a close game into a blowout.

Third, quarterback efficiency becomes much easier when the offensive line protects consistently.

Fourth, defensive pressure is often more informative than raw tackle totals.

Finally, a team does not need overwhelming passing volume when its rushing game is producing nearly seven yards per attempt.

These principles apply well beyond this specific matchup.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Los Angeles Rams vs Arizona Cardinals game?

The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Arizona Cardinals 45-17 in Week 14 of the 2025 NFL season.

Who was the best quarterback in the game?

Matthew Stafford had the stronger performance. He completed 22 of 31 passes for 281 yards, three touchdowns and no interceptions while posting a 131.2 passer rating.

Who led the Rams in receiving?

Puka Nacua led Los Angeles with seven receptions for 167 yards and two touchdowns on 11 targets.

Who led the Cardinals in receiving?

Michael Wilson led Arizona with 11 receptions for 142 yards and two touchdowns on 16 targets.

Who led the Rams in rushing?

Blake Corum led the Rams with 128 rushing yards on 12 carries. He averaged 10.7 yards per carry and scored two rushing touchdowns.

Why did the Rams win so comfortably?

The biggest statistical reasons were their 249 rushing yards, three rushing touchdowns, 281 passing yards, three passing touchdowns, zero sacks allowed and strong defensive pressure against Jacoby Brissett.

Conclusion

The los angeles rams vs arizona cardinals match player stats reveal a game that was won through complete offensive balance and defensive disruption.

Matthew Stafford was highly efficient, completing 22 of 31 passes for 281 yards and three touchdowns without an interception. Puka Nacua provided the explosive receiving element with 167 yards and two touchdowns. Blake Corum produced 128 rushing yards and two touchdowns, while Kyren Williams added 84 yards and another score.

The Rams’ 249 rushing yards were perhaps the clearest indicator of their control. Arizona managed only 51 rushing yards, leaving the Cardinals increasingly dependent on Brissett’s passing as the deficit grew.

Michael Wilson still produced an impressive individual performance for Arizona, catching 11 passes for 142 yards and two touchdowns. However, his production could not overcome the larger team-level disadvantages.

The defensive numbers reinforce the same conclusion. Los Angeles recorded three sacks, 11 quarterback hits, six pass defenses and one interception. Arizona recorded no sacks, two quarterback hits and two pass defenses.

Taken together, the statistics show why the 45-17 result was not a fluke. Los Angeles was more efficient, more balanced, more explosive and more disruptive in the areas that usually decide NFL games.